Search

Background: Blockade of programmed death 1 (PD-1), an inhibitory receptor expressed by T cells, can overcome immune resistance. We assessed the antitumor activity and safety of BMS-936558, an antibody that specifically blocks PD-1.Methods: We enrolled patients with advanced melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer, or renal-cell or colorectal cancer to receive anti-PD-1 antibody at a dose of 0.1 to 10.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks. Response was assessed after each 8-week treatment cycle. Patients received up to 12 cycles until disease progression or a complete response occurred.Results: A total of 296 patients received treatment through February 24, 2012. Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 14% of patients; there were three deaths from pulmonary toxicity. No maximum tolerated dose was defined. Adverse events consistent with immune-related causes were observed. Among 236 patients in whom response could be evaluated, objective responses (complete or partial responses) were observed in those with non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, or renal-cell cancer. Cumulative response rates (all doses) were 18% among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (14 of 76 patients), 28% among patients with melanoma (26 of 94 patients), and 27% among patients with renal-cell cancer (9 of 33 patients). Responses were durable; 20 of 31 responses lasted 1 year or more in patients with 1 year or more of follow-up. To assess the role of intratumoral PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression in the modulation of the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway, immunohistochemical analysis was performed on pretreatment tumor specimens obtained from 42 patients. Of 17 patients with PD-L1-negative tumors, none had an objective response; 9 of 25 patients (36%) with PD-L1-positive tumors had an objective response (P=0.006).Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 antibody produced objective responses in approximately one in four to one in five patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, or renal-cell cancer; the adverse-event profile does not appear to preclude its use. Preliminary data suggest a relationship between PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and objective response. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00730639.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastric carcinomas (GC) are aggressive malignancies, and only ~15% of patients respond to anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy. However, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated GCs (~5-10% of GCs) often harbor PD-L1 and PD-L2 chromosomal amplifications and robust CD8+ T cell infiltrates, and respond at a high rate to anti-PD-1. The current study compares the tumor immune microenvironments (TiMEs) of EBV+ versus EBV(-) GCs., Methods: Over 1000 cases of primary invasive GCs were screened to identify 25 treatment-naïve specimens for study (11 EBV+, 14 EBV(-)). Quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) was conducted for markers of immune cell subsets and co-regulatory molecules. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on RNAs isolated from macrodissected areas of CD3+ T cell infiltrates abutting PD-L1+ stromal/tumor cells, using multiplex quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for a panel of 122 candidate immune-related genes., Results: IHC revealed that 17/25 GCs contained PD-L1+ stromal cells, with no significant difference between EBV+/- specimens; however, only 3/25 specimens (all EBV+) contained PD-L1+ tumor cells. CD8+ T cell densities were higher in EBV+ versus EBV(-) tumors (p=0.044). With GEP normalized to the pan-leukocyte marker PTPRC/ CD45, EBV+ GCs overexpressed ITGAE (CD103, marking intraepithelial T cells and a dendritic cell subset) and the interferon-inducible genes CXCL9 and IDO1 . In contrast, EBV(-) tumors overexpressed several functionally-related gene groups associated with myeloid cells ( CD163 , IL1A , NOS2, RIGI), immunosuppressive cytokines/chemokines ( CXCL2 , CXCR4 , IL10, IL32), coinhibitory molecules ( HAVCR2/ TIM-3 and VSIR/ VISTA), and adenosine pathway components ( ENTPD1/ CD39 and NT5E/ CD73). Notably, compared with EBV+ GCs, EBV(-) GCs also overexpressed components of the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) pathway associated with cancer-promoting inflammation, including PTGS2/ COX-2 (most highly upregulated gene, 32-fold, p=0.005); prostaglandin receptors PTGER1 (EP1; up 21-fold, p=0.015) and PTGER4 (EP4; up twofold, p=0.022); and the major COX-2-inducing cytokine IL1B (up 11-fold, p=0.019). Consistent with these findings, COX-2 protein expression trended higher in EBV(-) versus EBV+ GCs (p=0.068)., Conclusions: While certain markers of immunosuppression are found in the GC TiME regardless of EBV status, EBV(-) GCs, which are much more common than EBV+ GCs, overexpress components of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway. These findings provide novel insights into the immune microenvironments of EBV+ and EBV(-) GC, and offer potential targets to overcome resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 therapies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MY receives grant/research support (to Johns Hopkins University) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Incyte, and Genentech; receives honoraria and consulting fees from Genentech, Incyte, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Replimune, Hepion, and Lantheus; is a cofounder with equity in Adventris Pharmaceuticals and has patents related to cancer vaccines, outside of the submitted work. KU-K has received stock from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and BioNTech. KX has received stock from Bristol Myers Squibb. JMT receives consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co, AstraZeneca, Elephas, Regeneron, Roche, Compugen, and Akoya Biosciences; has patents related to the AstroPath imaging suite; has received institutional research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Akoya Biosciences; and has received equipment and stock from Akoya Biosciences. RAA reports grants from RAPT Therapeutics, and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck, and JAZZ Oncology. SLT receives consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Dragonfly Therapeutics, PathAI, and (spouse) Amgen, Compugen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Normunity, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Tizona LLC; receives research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, and (spouse) Compugen and Immunomic Therapeutics; has stock options or stock in Atengen Inc., Dragonfly Therapeutics, and (spouse) DNAtrix, Dracen, ManaT Bio, RAPT Therapeutics, and Tizona LLC; and has patents related to the treatment of MSI-high cancers with anti-PD-1 and (spouse) related to T-cell regulatory molecules including LAG-3. The following authors declare no potential conflicts of interest: SB, TLM, QZ, JL, FB, LLE, and AEB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Intratumoral TLR9 agonists and anti-PD-1 produce clinical responses and broad immune activation. We conducted a single-arm study of neoadjuvant TLR9 agonist vidutolimod combined with anti-PD-1 nivolumab in high-risk resectable melanoma. In 31 evaluable patients, 55% major pathologic response (MPR) was observed, meeting primary endpoint. MPR was associated with necrosis, and melanophagocytosis with increased CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in the tumor microenvironment, and increased frequencies of Ki67 + CD8 + T cells peripherally. MPRs had an enriched pre-treatment gene signature of myeloid cells, and response to therapy was associated with gene signatures of immune cells, pDCs, phagocytosis, and macrophage activation. MPRs gut microbiota were enriched for Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Bacteroidaceae and Enterobacteriaceae families and the small subgroup of Gram-negative Firmicutes. Our findings support that combined vidutolimod and nivolumab stimulates a broad anti-tumor immune response and is associated with distinct baseline myeloid gene signature and gut microbiota. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03618641., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests D.D. reports grants/research support (NIH/NCI and Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) and consulting (Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) during the conduct of the study. D.D. also reports grants/research support (Arcus, Immunocore, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tesaro/GSK.), consulting (ACM Bio, Ascendis, Castle, Clinical Care Options [CCO], Gerson Lehrman Group [GLG], Immunitas, Medical Learning Group [MLG], Replimmune, Trisalus, Xilio Therapeutics), speakers’ bureau (Castle Biosciences), steering committee membership (Immunocore, Replimmune) and patents related to gut microbial signatures of response and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade (US Patent 63/124,231 and US Patent 63/208,719) outside the submitted work. P.D. is currently employed by Nanostring Technologies and reports stock options. Y.G.N. reports grants/research support (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Pfizer) and consulting (Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) outside the submitted work. J.J.L. reports grants/research support (multiple), membership on data safety monitoring boards (multiple), membership on scientific advisory boards with no stock ownership or stock options (multiple), membership on scientific advisory boards with stock for (multiple), consulting (multiple) and a provisional patent for cancer immunotherapy (PCT/US18/36052: Microbiome Biomarkers for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 responsiveness: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic uses thereof) all outside the submitted work. D.M. is currently employed by Codiak Biosciences and reports stock options. D.B., J.W. and A.K. were formerly employed by CheckMate and report stock options. M.G.F. is currently employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and reports stock options. J.M.K. reports grants/research support (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen Inc.) and consulting (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Amgen Inc., Checkmate, Castle Biosciences, Inc., Immunocore LLC, Iovance, Novartis.) outside the submitted work. J.M.T. reports grants and consulting from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Astra Zeneca, and Compugen outside the submitted work. H.M.Z. reports grants/research support (NIH/NCI and Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) and consulting (Checkmate Pharmaceuticals) during the conduct of the study. H.M.Z. also reports grants/research support (NIH/NCI, Bristol-Myers Squibb and GlaxoSmithKline), personal fees (GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, and Vedanta) and pending provisional patents related to gut microbial signatures of response and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade (US Patent 63/124,231 and US Patent 63/208,719) outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with improved response in solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint blockade, but understanding of the prognostic and predictive value of TLS and the circumstances of their resolution is incomplete. Here we show that in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, high intratumoral TLS density at the time of surgery is associated with pathologic response and improved relapse-free survival. In areas of tumor regression, we identify a noncanonical involuted morphology of TLS marked by dispersion of the B cell follicle, persistence of a T cell zone enriched for T cell-mature dendritic cell interactions and increased expression of T cell memory markers. Collectively, these data suggest that TLS can serve as both a prognostic and predictive marker of response to immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and that late-stage TLS may support T cell memory formation after elimination of a viable tumor., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Pathologic response is an endpoint in many ongoing clinical trials for neoadjuvant regimens, including immune checkpoint blockade and chemotherapy. Whole-slide scanning of glass slides generates high-resolution digital images and allows for remote review and potential measurement with image analysis tools, but concordance of pathologic response assessment on digital scans compared with that on glass slides has yet to be evaluated. Such a validation goes beyond previous concordance studies, which focused on establishing surgical pathology diagnoses, as it requires quantitative assessment of tumor, necrosis, and regression. Further, as pathologic response assessment is being used as an endpoint, such concordance studies have regulatory implications. The purpose of this study was 2-fold, which was as follows: first, to determine the concordance between pathologic response assessed on glass slides and that assessed on digital scans, and second, to determine if pathologists benefited from using measurement tools when determining pathologic response. To that end, hematoxylin and eosin-stained glass slides from 64 non-small cell lung carcinoma specimens were visually assessed for percent residual viable tumor (%RVT). The sensitivity and specificity for digital vs glass reads of pathologic complete response (0% RVT) and major pathologic response (≤10% RVT) were all >95%. When %RVT was considered as a continuous variable, the intraclass correlation coefficient of digital vs glass reads was 0.94. The visual assessments of pathologic response were supported by pathologist annotations of residual tumor and tumor bed areas. In a separate subset of hematoxylin and eosin-stained glass slides, several measurement approaches to quantifying %RVT were performed. Pathologist estimates strongly reflected measured %RVT. This study demonstrates the high level of concordance between glass slides evaluated using light microscopy and digital whole-slide images for pathologic response assessments. Pathologists did not require measurement tools to generate robust %RVT values from slide annotations. These findings have broad implications for improving clinical workflows and multisite clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Therapies targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (abbreviated as PD-(L)1) axis are a significant advancement in the treatment of many tumor types. However, many patients receiving these agents fail to respond or have an initial response followed by cancer progression. For these patients, while subsequent immunotherapies that either target a different axis of immune biology or non-immune combination therapies are reasonable treatment options, the lack of predictive biomarkers to follow-on agents is impeding progress in the field. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mechanisms driving resistance to PD-(L)1 therapies, the state of biomarker development along this axis, and inherent challenges in future biomarker development for these immunotherapies. Innovation in the development and application of novel biomarkers and patient selection strategies for PD-(L)1 agents is required to accelerate the delivery of effective treatments to the patients most likely to respond., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SW—Salary and employment: Kite Pharma, Gilead; Consulting fees: SciSpot; Stock ownership: Kite Pharma, Gilead. JCB—Salary and employment: Precede Biosciences; Ownership: JCarl Consulting, LLC; Stock Ownership: AstraZeneca. CG-B—Salary and employment: Bristol Myers Squibb. Stock ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. KAS—Consulting fees: Shattuck Labs, EMD Serono, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Genmab, Takeda, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Agenus, Repertoire; Fees for non-CE services: Bristol Myers Squibb, Fluidigm Corporation, Genmab, Merck, Takeda; Contracted research: Navigate Biopharma, Tesaro/GSK, Moderna Inc., Pierre-Fabre, Takeda, Surface Oncology, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Ribon Therapeutics, Akoya Biosciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly. JMT—Research funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Akoya Biosciences; Consulting fees: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Merck & Co., AstraZeneca, Regeneron; Stock ownership: Akoya Biosciences. BT—Salary and employment: Merck & Co.; Stock ownership: Merck & Co. AS—Salary and employment: Generate Biomedicines; Stock ownership, Generate Biomedicines, Merck & Co., Allogene. AM—Nothing to disclose. SITC Staff: FD, PJI—Nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Standard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes., Methods: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety., Results: At this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P<0.001). A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group., Conclusions: Perioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 77T ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04025879.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Cancer-related mortality rates among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are high, but these patients have largely been excluded from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors because of immunosuppression and risk of treatment-related allograft loss (TRAL). We conducted a prospective clinical trial testing nivolumab (NIVO) + tacrolimus (TACRO) + prednisone (PRED) ± ipilimumab (IPI) in KTR with advanced cutaneous cancers., Methods: Adult KTR with advanced melanoma or basal, cutaneous squamous, or Merkel cell carcinomas were eligible. Immunosuppression was standardized to TACRO (serum trough 2-5 ng/mL) + PRED 5 mg once daily. Patients then received NIVO 480 mg IV once every 4 weeks. The primary composite end point was partial or complete (tumor) response (CR) or stable disease per RECIST v1.1 without allograft loss at 16W. Patients with progressive disease (PD) could receive IPI 1 mg/kg IV + NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels were measured approximately once every 2 weeks as a potential predictor of allograft rejection., Results: Among eight evaluable patients, none met the trial's primary end point. All eight patients experienced PD on NIVO + TACRO + PRED; TRAL occurred in one patient. Six patients then received IPI + NIVO + TACRO + PRED. Best overall responses: two CR (one with TRAL) and four PD (one with TRAL). In total, 7 of 8 pre-NIVO tumor biopsies contained a paucity of infiltrating immune cells. In total, 2 of 5 on-NIVO biopsies demonstrated moderate immune infiltrates; both patients later experienced a CR to IPI + NIVO. In 2 of 3 patients with TRAL, dd-cfDNA elevations occurred 10 and 15 days before increases in serum creatinine., Conclusion: In most KTR with advanced skin cancer, TACRO + PRED provides insufficient allograft protection and compromises immune-mediated tumor regression after administration of NIVO ± IPI. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels can signal treatment-related allograft rejection earlier than rises in serum creatinine.

Background: Tumor regression following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), marked by inflammation in non-cancerous tissues. This study was undertaken to investigate the functional relationship between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity, to facilitate irAE management while promoting anti-tumor immunity., Methods: Multiple biopsies from tumor and inflamed tissues were collected from a patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB, who underwent rapid autopsy. Immune cells infiltrating melanoma lesions and inflamed normal tissues were subjected to gene expression profiling with multiplex qRT-PCR for 122 candidate genes. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess the expression of 14 candidate markers of immune cell subsets and checkpoints. TCR-beta sequencing was used to explore T cell clonal repertoires across specimens., Results: While genes involved in MHC I/II antigen presentation, IFN signaling, innate immunity and immunosuppression were abundantly expressed across specimens, irAE tissues over-expressed certain genes associated with immunosuppression (CSF1R, IL10RA, IL27/EBI3, FOXP3, KLRG1, SOCS1, TGFB1), including those in the COX-2/PGE2 pathway (IL1B, PTGER1/EP1 and PTGER4/EP4). Immunohistochemistry revealed similar proportions of immunosuppressive cell subsets and checkpoint molecules across samples. TCRseq did not indicate common TCR repertoires across tumor and inflammation sites, arguing against shared antigen recognition between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity in this patient., Conclusions: This comprehensive study of a single patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB explores the immune landscape across these tissues, revealing similarities between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity. Further, it highlights expression of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway, which is known to be immunosuppressive and potentially mediates ICB resistance. Ongoing clinical trials of COX-2/PGE2 pathway inhibitors targeting the major COX-2 inducer IL-1B, COX-2 itself, or the PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 present new opportunities to promote anti-tumor activity, but may also have the potential to enhance the severity of ICB-induced irAEs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Novel perioperative strategies are needed to reduce recurrence rates in patients undergoing nephrectomy for high-risk, non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We conducted a prospective, phase I trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab prior to nephrectomy in 15 evaluable patients with non-metastatic ccRCC. We leveraged tissue from that cohort to elucidate the effects of PD-1 inhibition on immune cell populations in ccRCC and correlate the evolving immune milieu with anti-PD-1 response. We found that nivolumab durably induces a pro-inflammatory state within the primary tumor, and baseline immune infiltration within the primary tumor correlates with nivolumab responsiveness. Nivolumab increases CTLA-4 expression in the primary tumor, and subsequent nephrectomy increases circulating concentrations of sPD-L1, sPD-L3 (sB7-H3), and s4-1BB. These findings form the basis to consider neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for high-risk ccRCC while the tumor remains in situ and provide the rationale for perioperative strategies of novel ICI combinations., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy improves event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (0% residual viable tumor (RVT) in primary tumor (PT) and lymph nodes (LNs)), and is approved for treatment of resectable lung cancer. Pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy is the potential analog to radiographic response for advanced disease. However, %RVT thresholds beyond pathologic complete response and major pathologic response (≤10% RVT) have not been explored. Pathologic response was prospectively assessed in the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial (NCT02998528), which evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab (anti-programmed death protein 1) plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable lung cancer. RVT, regression and necrosis were quantified (0-100%) in PT and LNs using a pan-tumor scoring system and tested for association with EFS in a prespecified exploratory analysis. Regardless of LN involvement, EFS improved with 0% versus >0% RVT-PT (hazard ratio = 0.18). RVT-PT predicted EFS for nivolumab plus chemotherapy (area under the curve = 0.74); 2-year EFS rates were 90%, 60%, 57% and 39% for patients with 0-5%, >5-30%, >30-80% and >80% RVT, respectively. Each 1% RVT associated with a 0.017 hazard ratio increase for EFS. Combining pathologic response from PT and LNs helped differentiate outcomes. When compared with radiographic response and circulating tumor DNA clearance, %RVT best approximated EFS. These findings support pathologic response as an emerging survival surrogate. Further assessment of the full spectrum of %RVT in lung cancer and other tumor types is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02998528 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Systemic treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are limited, particularly when tumors are refractory to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1). A better understanding of immune checkpoint expression within the BCC tumor microenvironment may inform combinatorial treatment strategies to optimize response rates. CD3, PD-1, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), and T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3)+ cell densities within the tumor microenvironment of 34 archival, histologically aggressive BCCs were assessed. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) expression of PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3, and to a lesser degree TIM-3, correlated with increasing CD3+ T-cell densities (Pearson's r =0.89, 0.72, 0.87, and 0.63, respectively). 100% of BCCs (34/34) demonstrated LAG-3 and PD-1 expression in >1% TIL; and the correlation between PD-1 and LAG-3 densities was high (Pearson's r=0.89). LAG-3 was expressed at ~50% of the level of PD-1. Additionally, we present a patient with locally-advanced BCC who experienced stable disease during and after 45 weeks of first-line anti-PD-1 (nivolumab), followed by a partial response after the addition of anti-LAG-3 (relatlimab). Longitudinal biopsies throughout the treatment course showed a graduated increase in LAG-3 expression after anti-PD-1 therapy, lending support for coordinated immunosuppression and suggesting LAG-3 as a co-target for combination therapy to augment the clinical impact of anti-PD-(L)1., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JSD receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb. DW is an employee of Merck. EJL serves as a consultant/advisory board member for Array BioPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Macrogenics, Merck, Millennium, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, and receives institutional research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck and Regeneron. JMT serves as a consultant/advisory board member for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Compugen, and Akoya Biosciences. No additional potential conflicts of interest were disclosed., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy can improve outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative regimens may combine benefits of both to improve long-term outcomes., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II to IIIB [N2 node stage] according to the eighth edition of the  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual ) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy plus durvalumab or placebo administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery, followed by adjuvant durvalumab or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 12 cycles. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (II or III) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥1% or <1%). Primary end points were event-free survival (defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of progressive disease that precluded surgery or prevented completion of surgery, disease recurrence [assessed in a blinded fashion by independent central review], or death from any cause) and pathological complete response (evaluated centrally)., Results: A total of 802 patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (400 patients) or placebo (402 patients). The duration of event-free survival was significantly longer with durvalumab than with placebo; the stratified hazard ratio for disease progression, recurrence, or death was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.88; P = 0.004) at the first interim analysis. At the 12-month landmark analysis, event-free survival was observed in 73.4% of the patients who received durvalumab (95% CI, 67.9 to 78.1), as compared with 64.5% of the patients who received placebo (95% CI, 58.8 to 69.6). The incidence of pathological complete response was significantly greater with durvalumab than with placebo (17.2% vs. 4.3% at the final analysis; difference, 13.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.7 to 17.6; P<0.001 at interim analysis of data from 402 patients). Event-free survival and pathological complete response benefit were observed regardless of stage and PD-L1 expression. Adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 occurred in 42.4% of patients with durvalumab and in 43.2% with placebo. Data from 62 patients with documented EGFR or ALK alterations were excluded from the efficacy analyses in the modified intention-to-treat population., Conclusions: In patients with resectable NSCLC, perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly greater event-free survival and pathological complete response than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, with a safety profile that was consistent with the individual agents. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AEGEAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03800134.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: We previously reported rates of pathological complete responses (51% [95% CI 39-62] per independent central review, the primary endpoint) and major pathological responses (13% per independent central review, a secondary endpoint) to neoadjuvant cemiplimab (an anti-PD-1 inhibitor) among 79 patients with locoregionally advanced, resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Here, we present follow-up data, including event-free, disease-free, and overall survival., Methods: This single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study included patients aged 18 years or older with resectable stage II-IV (M0) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received up to four planned doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks followed by curative-intent surgery. After surgery, per investigator discretion, patients received either adjuvant cemiplimab for up to 48 weeks, radiotherapy, or observation alone. Secondary endpoints included in this follow-up analysis are event-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival, all summarised using the Kaplan-Meier method. Activity and safety endpoints were analysed for all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of neoadjuvant cemiplimab. In this report, safety data are reported for all patients who received at least one dose of adjuvant cemiplimab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04154943, has completed enrolment and follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between March 20, 2020, and July 8, 2021, 79 patients were enrolled. Median age was 73 years (IQR 66-81), 67 (85%) patients were male, 12 (15%) were female, 69 (87%) were White, one was Asian (1%), one was other race (1%), and race was not reported for eight (10%). As of data cutoff (Dec 1, 2022), median follow-up was 18·7 months (IQR 15·6-22·1) for all 79 patients. Among 70 patients who had surgery, 65 (93%) had post-surgical management data: 32 (49%) of 65 were observed postoperatively, 16 (25%) received adjuvant cemiplimab, and 17 (26%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. 11 (14%) of 79 patients had event-free survival events, with an estimated 12-month event-free survival of 89% (95% CI 79-94) for all patients. None of 40 patients who had a pathological complete response and one (10%) of ten patients with major pathological response had recurrence. Six (9%) of 70 patients who completed surgery had a disease-free survival event, with an estimated 12-month disease-free survival of 92% (95% CI 82-97). Nine (11%) of 79 patients died, with an estimated 12-month overall survival for all patients of 92% (95% CI 83-96). Four (25%) of 16 patients who received adjuvant cemiplimab treatment had grade 3 adverse events, including one (6%) who had increased blood potassium, one (6%) who had traumatic limb amputation, and two who had serious adverse events (one [6%] cardiomyopathy and one [6%] hypophysitis). There were no grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: For patients with resectable stage II-IV cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant cemiplimab followed by surgery might be a potential treatment option, addressing a substantial unmet need., Funding: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NDG reports institutional research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; speaker honoraria from AiCME; and advisory board and consulting fees from PDS Biotechnology, Replimmune, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Merck. DMM reports honoraria for advisory or consultant roles from Castle Biosciences, EMD Serono, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharpe & Dome, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Sanofi Genzyme, and Bristol Myers Squibb; equity options from Checkpoint Therapeutics and Avstera Therapeutics Corp; and research funding from Kartos Therapeutics, NeoImmune Tech, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. NIK reports grants and advisory board fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Replimmune, and Novartis; advisory board fees from Iovance, Instil Bio, Castle Biosciences, Nektar, Incyte (data safety monitoring committee), AstraZeneca (data safety monitoring committee), and Jounce Therapeutics; grants from GlaxoSmithKline, HUYA, and Celgene; honoraria from Genzyme, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (paid by Pfizer), Nektar (study steering committee), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (study steering committee), Bristol Myers Squibb (study steering committee). and Replimmune (study steering committee); grant from Modulation Therapeutics; travel support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and common stock ownership of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Amarin, and Asensus Surgical (formerly Transenetrix). VD reports institutional research funding from Genentech, and advisory board fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. ESR reports advisory board and consulting fees from Genentech, Feldan Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi, and serves on the board of directors for Checkpoint Therapeutics. EJL reports institutional research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; institutional grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck; advisory board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Genentech, Instil Bio, Merck, Natera, Nektar Therapeutics, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Replimmune, and Sanofi; payment for speaker's fee from Bristol Myers Squibb; and consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Macrogenics, OncoSec, Merck, Novartis, CareDX, and Pfizer. FM reports travel support, speaker's fees or advisor's honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi; and research funding from Novartis and Roche. PLS reports institutional research grants from Ascentage Pharma and Pfizer, and advisory board roles for Elevar Therapeutics, Prelude Therapeutics, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. JA reports payment or honoraria for speakers bureaus and presentations from Bristol Myers Squibb and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; advisory board and consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle Biosciences, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. JLG reports institutional research funding from Alkermes, EMD Serono, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Roche/Genentech; and advisory board or consultant fees from Astellas, Exelixis, EMD Serono, Merck, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. AH reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck-Pfizer, MSD/Merck, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis Pharma, Eisai, Replimmune, NeraCare; consulting fees from Seagen, IO Biotech, Dermagnostix, Incyte, Highlight Therapeutics, and Iovance; speaker's honoraria from Kyowa Kirin; advisory board fees from Immunocore; and institutional grants from Huya Biosciences outside the submitted work. JHC reports consulting or advisory roles for Exelixis, Coherus Biosciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and institutional research funding from Arcus Biosciences and Genmab. BGMH reports consulting or advisory roles at AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche, and institutional research funding from Amgen. DS reports honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Array BioPharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, 4SC, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, NeraCare GmbH, Sun Pharma, InflarxGmbH, Ultimovacs, and Sandoz; consulting fees from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, 4SC, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Nektar; speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Merck; advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, 4SC, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Nektar; institutional research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, MSD Oncology, and Array BioPharma/Pfizer; unpaid leadership or fiduciary roles with Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Melanoma Group, Hiege-Stiftung, and Nationale Versorgungskonferenz Hautkrebs; and travel and accommodation expenses from Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. VAP reports honoraria for advisory or consulting roles from Sun Pharma, Almirall, Biofrontera, PhD Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi Genzyme; speakers bureau fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi Genzyme, equity in Avstera Therapeutics and Science 37; and research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. JMT reports honoraria for advisory or consultant roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Compugen, Lunaphore, and Akoya Biosciences; stock options in Akoya Biosciences; equipment loan and reagent provision from Akoya Biosciences; and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Akoya Biosciences. AML reports uncompensated consultancy for Eisai, research funding support from Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and support from a Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Discovery Partner Fellowship. RF reports grants or investigator-initiated trial support from Merck, Pfizer, Gilead, and Ayala; royalties from UpToDate for a chapter on olfactory neuroblastoma; payment for expert testimony from Guidepoint; and advisory board participation with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Prelude Therapeutics, Elevar Therapeutics, Eisai, Remix Therapeutics, and Coherus BioSciences. S-YY, HH, FS, and IL are employees and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. MM and MGF report receipt of support for attending meetings or travel, and are also employees, patent holders, and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. DR reports institutional research grant and funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Sanofi, Kura Oncology, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Decibel Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and ALX Oncology; and uncompensated scientific committee and advisory board roles for Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, and Eisai. YBS and JH declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Since the first approval for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma more than a decade ago, immunotherapy has completely transformed the treatment landscape of this chemotherapy-resistant disease. Combination regimens including ICIs directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agents or, more recently, anti-lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) agents, have gained regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, with long-term follow-up data suggesting the possibility of cure for some patients with advanced disease. In the resectable setting, adjuvant ICIs prolong recurrence-free survival, and neoadjuvant strategies are an active area of investigation. Other immunotherapy strategies, such as oncolytic virotherapy for injectable cutaneous melanoma and bispecific T-cell engager therapy for HLA-A*02:01 genotype-positive uveal melanoma, are also available to patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of these regimens for many patients with cutaneous melanoma, traditional immunotherapy biomarkers (ie, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, T-cell infiltrate and/or microsatellite stability) have failed to reliably predict response. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles, particularly for the highly active combination of anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, including rare subtypes of the disease (eg, uveal, mucosal), with the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the Expert Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using immunotherapy to treat melanoma, with topics including therapy selection in the advanced and perioperative settings, intratumoral immunotherapy, when to use immunotherapy for patients with BRAF V600-mutated disease, management of patients with brain metastases, evaluation of treatment response, special patient populations, patient education, quality of life, and survivorship, among others., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CA—Other: Stock Pfizer, Advisory Board: Iovance and Merck, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. EIB—Consulting Fees: Nektar, Instilbio, Novartis, Xilio, Sanofi, Merck, and Iovance. DD—IP Rights: US Patent 63/124,231, Compositions and Methods for Treating Cancer, December 11, 2020, US Patent 63/208,719, Compositions and Methods For Determining Responsiveness to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI), Increasing Effectiveness of ICI and Treating Cancer, June 9, 2021; Consulting Fees: Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Finch, Shionogi, Vedanta Biosciences; Fees for Non CE Services: Medical Learning Group (MLG), Clinical Care Options (CCO); Contracted Research: Arcus, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, CellSight Technologies, Immunocore, Merck, Tesaro/GSK. GTG—Consulting Fees: Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, Genentech, Novartis, Merck, Sapience Therapeutics, Exicure, Eisai, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Lyell Immunopharma, and HUYABIO International; Contracted Research: Exelixis (institutional support), Lucerno Dynamics. OH—Researcher: Arcus, Aduro, Akeso, Amgen, Bioatla, BMS, Cytomx, Exelixis, Roche Genentech, GSK, Immunocore, Idera, Incyte, Iovance, Merck, Moderna, Merck Serono, Nextcure, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Seattle Gen, Torque, Zelluna; Consultant Advisor Speaker: Alkermes, Amgen, Bactonix, Beigene, Bioatla, BMS, Esai, Roche Genentech, Georiamune, GigaGen, Grit Bio, GSK, Idera, Immunocore, Incyte, Instilbio, IO Biotech, Iovance, Janssen, KSQ, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Obsidian, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seattle Gen, Tempus, Vial Health Tech, Zelluna; Independent Contractor: Alkermes, Amgen, Bactonix, Beigene, Bioatla, BMS, Esai, Roche Genentech, Georiamune, GigaGen, Grit Bio, GSK, Idera, Immunocore, Incyte, Instilbio, IO Biotech, Iovance, Janssen, KSQ, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Obsidian, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seattle Gen, Tempus, Vial Health Tech, Zelluna; Publically Traded Stocks: Bactonix. TJH—Contracted Research: Genentech, SkylineDX. BI—Consulting Fees: Johnson & Johnson, Volastra Therapeutics, Merck, AstraZeneca, Eisai and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; research funding to Columbia University from Alkermes, Arcus Biosciences, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Compugen, Immunocore, and Synthekine. DBJ—IP Rights: MHC-II for use as immunotherapy biomarker, Abatacept as treatment for irAEs; Consulting Fees: BMS, Catalyst, Iovance, Jansen, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Mosaic ImmunoIngineering, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Targovax; Contracted Research: BMS, Incyte. RPK—Consulting Fees: Regeneron. JJL—Researcher: AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, Xencor; Consultant Advisor Speaker: AbbVie, Agenus, Alnylam, Atomwise, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Cugene, Curadev, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Inzen, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Instil, IO Biotech, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Pioneering Medicines, PsiOxus, Regeneron, Replimmune, Ribon, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Synlogic, Synthekine 7 Hills, Affivant, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio (stock) Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, physIQ, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, Tempest, AbbVie, Agenus, Amgen, Immutep, Evaxion. TCM—Consulting Fees: Merck, BMS, GigaGen, OncoSec; Pfizer – Scientific Advisory Board. MJM—Consulting Fees: AstraZeneca, Nektar Therapeutics, Istari Oncology, Immunai, Xilio Therapeutics; Fees for Non CE Services: Bristol Myers Squibb (served as a speaker). ACP—Consulting Fees: Regeneron, BMS, Merck; Fees for Non CE Services: BMS; Contracted Research: Merck, BMS, Iovance, Regeneron, Takeda, Ideaya, Replimune: All payments to institution. KMR—Consulting Fees: BMS, Merck, Eisai, Immunocore. AKSS—Consulting Fees: Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Iovance. Contracted Research: Ascentage, Ideaya, Regeneron, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Merck, Nektar, Olatec, Replimune, Seagen. KS—Contracted Research: Trials at Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Syndax, Provectus, OmniSeq, BrightPath Biotherapeutics, Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, Hlsinn, AbbVie, BMS, OncoSec, Ultimovacs, Altellas, AstraZeneca, Xencor, Exicure, Numab, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Natera. RJS—Reseracher: Merck (research funding); Consultant Advisor Speaker: BMS, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer; Other: Faculty for SCION Workshop. JT—Consulting Fees: GSK, Genentech, BMS, Akoya Biosciences, Merck, AstraZeneca, Compugen, Lunaphore; Contracted Research: BMS, Akoya Biosciences; Other: Akoya Biosciences; Other Details: Patent pending for multiplexing imaging strategy; Ownership Interest Less Than 5 Per Cent: Akoya Biosciences. HAT—Consulting Fees: Genentech, BMS, Novartis, Merck, Eisai, Karyopharm, Boxer Capital, Iovance, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medicenna; Contracted Research: Genentech, BMS, Novartis, Merck, GSK, EMD Serono, Eisai, Dragonfly Therapeutics, RAPT Therapeutics. JKT—Nothing to Disclose. CV—Nothing to Disclose. SAW—Consulting Fees: Lyell; Contracted Research: research funds to institution from BMS and Apexigen. MKW—Consulting Fees: Merck, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, EMD-Serono, ExiCure, Castle Biosciences, Adagene. SITC Staff—CG, AK, NL, SM-W—Nothing to Disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Multiplex immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence (mIHC/mIF) is a developing technology that facilitates the evaluation of multiple, simultaneous protein expressions at single-cell resolution while preserving tissue architecture. These approaches have shown great potential for biomarker discovery, yet many challenges remain. Importantly, streamlined cross-registration of multiplex immunofluorescence images with additional imaging modalities and immunohistochemistry (IHC) can help increase the plex and/or improve the quality of the data generated by potentiating downstream processes such as cell segmentation. To address this problem, a fully automated process was designed to perform a hierarchical, parallelizable, and deformable registration of multiplexed digital whole-slide images (WSIs). We generalized the calculation of mutual information as a registration criterion to an arbitrary number of dimensions, making it well suited for multiplexed imaging. We also used the self-information of a given IF channel as a criterion to select the optimal channels to use for registration. Additionally, as precise labeling of cellular membranes in situ is essential for robust cell segmentation, a pan-membrane immunohistochemical staining method was developed for incorporation into mIF panels or for use as an IHC followed by cross-registration. In this study, we demonstrate this process by registering whole-slide 6-plex/7-color mIF images with whole-slide brightfield mIHC images, including a CD3 and a pan-membrane stain. Our algorithm, WSI, mutual information registration (WSIMIR), performed highly accurate registration allowing the retrospective generation of an 8-plex/9-color, WSI, and outperformed 2 alternative automated methods for cross-registration by Jaccard index and Dice similarity coefficient (WSIMIR vs automated WARPY, P < .01 and P < .01, respectively, vs HALO + transformix, P = .083 and P = .049, respectively). Furthermore, the addition of a pan-membrane IHC stain cross-registered to an mIF panel facilitated improved automated cell segmentation across mIF WSIs, as measured by significantly increased correct detections, Jaccard index (0.78 vs 0.65), and Dice similarity coefficient (0.88 vs 0.79)., (Copyright © 2023 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Our understanding of the biology and management of human disease has undergone a remarkable evolution in recent decades. Improved understanding of the roles of complex immune populations in the tumor microenvironment has advanced our knowledge of antitumor immunity, and immunotherapy has radically improved outcomes for many advanced cancers. Digital pathology has unlocked new possibilities for the assessment and discovery of the tumor microenvironment, such as quantitative and spatial image analysis. Despite these advances, tissue-based evaluations for diagnosis and prognosis continue to rely on traditional practices, such as hematoxylin and eosin staining, supplemented by the assessment of single biomarkers largely using chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC). Such approaches are poorly suited to complex quantitative analyses and the simultaneous evaluation of multiple biomarkers. Thus, multiplex staining techniques have significant potential to improve diagnostic practice and immuno-oncology research. The different approaches to achieve multiplexed IHC and immunofluorescence are described in this study. Alternatives to multiplex immunofluorescence/IHC include epitope-based tissue mass spectrometry and digital spatial profiling (DSP), which require specialized platforms not available to most clinical laboratories. Virtual multiplexing, which involves digitally coregistering singleplex IHC stains performed on serial sections, is another alternative to multiplex staining. Regardless of the approach, analysis of multiplexed stains sequentially or simultaneously will benefit from standardized protocols and digital pathology workflows. Although this is a complex and rapidly advancing field, multiplex staining is now technically feasible for most clinical laboratories and may soon be leveraged for routine diagnostic use. This review provides an update on the current state of the art for tissue multiplexing, including the capabilities and limitations of different techniques, with an emphasis on potential relevance to clinical diagnostic practice., (Copyright © 2023 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Multispectral, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) microscopy has been used to great effect in research to identify cellular co-expression profiles and spatial relationships within tissue, providing a myriad of diagnostic advantages. As these technologies mature, it is essential that image data from mIF microscopes is reproducible and standardizable across devices. We sought to characterize and correct differences in illumination intensity and spectral sensitivity between three multispectral microscopes. We scanned eight melanoma tissue samples twice on each microscope and calculated their average tissue region flux intensities. We found a baseline average standard deviation of 29.9% across all microscopes, scans, and samples, which was reduced to 13.9% after applying sample-specific corrections accounting for differences in the tissue shown on each slide. We used a basic calibration model to correct sample- and microscope-specific effects on overall brightness and relative brightness as a function of the image layer. We tested the generalizability of the calibration procedure and found that applying corrections to independent validation subsets of the samples reduced the variation to 2.9 ± 0.03%. Variations in the unmixed marker expressions were reduced from 15.8% to 4.4% by correcting the raw images to a single reference microscope. Our findings show that mIF microscopes can be standardized for use in clinical pathology laboratories using a relatively simple correction model.

With a rapidly developing immunotherapeutic landscape for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma, biomarkers of efficacy are highly desirable to guide treatment strategy. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides are inexpensive and widely available in pathology laboratories, including in resource-poor settings. Here, H&E scoring of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIL plus ) in pre-treatment tumor specimens using light microscopy is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in three independent cohorts of patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade. Necrosis score alone does not associate with OS; however, necrosis modifies the predictive effect of TIL plus , a finding that has broad translational relevance for tissue-based biomarker development. PBRM1 mutational status is combined with H&E scores to further refine outcome predictions (OS, p = 0.007, and objective response, p = 0.04). These findings bring H&E assessment to the fore for biomarker development in future prospective, randomized trials, and emerging multi-omics classifiers., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Dr. Taube reports grants and consulting from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Akoya Biosciences, consulting for Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Lunaphore, and Compugen outside the submitted work. Dr. Deutsch and Dr. Taube report an institutional patent filed on machine learning for scoring pathologic response to immunotherapy. Dr. Topalian reports research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; personal fees from AstraZeneca and Immunocore; and personal fees and stock options from Five Prime Therapeutics and Dragonfly Therapeutics. Dr. Topalian’s spouse has financial relationships with the following entities: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Compugen, DNAtrix, Dracen Pharmaceuticals, Enara Bio, Immunomic Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, ManaT Bio, RAPT Therapeutics, Tizona LLC, Trieza Therapeutics, TRex Bio Ltd, and WindMIL. Dr. Lipson receives institutional research grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Regeneron, and during the past 2 years, has consulted for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Genentech, Instil Bio, MacroGenics, Merck, Natera, Nektar Therapeutics, Odonate, OncoSec, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Regeneron, and Sanofi Genzyme. Dr. Choueiri reports institutional and personal, paid and/or unpaid support for research, advisory boards, consultancy, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Nuscan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, and others), outside the submitted work. Institutional patents filed on molecular alterations and immunotherapy response/toxicity, and ctDNA. Equity: Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio. CureResponse. Committees: NCCN, GU Steering Committee, ASCO/ESMO, ACCRU, KidneyCan. Medical writing and editorial assistance support may have been funded by Communications companies in part. No speaker’s bureau. Mentored several non-US citizens on research projects with potential funding (in part) from non-US sources/Foreign Components. The institution (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) may have received additional independent funding of drug companies or/and royalties potentially involved in research around the subject matter. Dr. Atkins reports personal support for, advisory boards and consultancy from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Aveo, Pfizer, Werewolf, Fathom, Pyxis Oncology, PACT, Elpis, X4Pharma, ValoHealth, ScholarRock, Surface, Takeda, Simcha, Genentech-Roche, Exelixis, Iovance, COTA, Idera, Agenus, Asher Bio, Neoleukin, AstraZeneca, Calithera, SeaGen, Sanofi, SAB Bio, OncoRena, Pliant Therapeutics, Up-To-Date, and GlaxoSmithKline. Institutional Research support from BMS, Merck, and Pfizer and Stock or Stock options from Werewolf, Pyxis Oncology, and Elpis outside the submitted work. Dr. Signoretti reports receiving commercial research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, and Novartis; is a consultant/advisory board member for Merck, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CRISPR Therapeutics AG, AACR, and NCI; and receives royalties from Biogenex. Saurabh Gupta is a full-time employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb and owns BMS stock. Dr. Motzer reports clinical trial support (institutional) from BMS for this manuscript; advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, AVEO, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Incyte, Lilly Oncology, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer; and fees (institutional) for coordinating PI from AVEO, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Merck, and Pfizer. Dr. Ged reports advisory roles and has received honoraria from Aveo, Bristol Myers Squibb, BostonGene, and Exelixis. Drs. Baraban, Singla, Jedrych, and Danilova declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory receptor expressed by activated T cells that downmodulates effector functions and limits the generation of immune memory. PD-1 blockade can mediate tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients with melanoma, but it is not known whether this is associated with extended survival or maintenance of response after treatment is discontinued., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced melanoma (N = 107) enrolled between 2008 and 2012 received intravenous nivolumab in an outpatient setting every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks and were observed for overall survival, long-term safety, and response duration after treatment discontinuation., Results: Median overall survival in nivolumab-treated patients (62% with two to five prior systemic therapies) was 16.8 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62% and 43%, respectively. Among 33 patients with objective tumor regressions (31%), the Kaplan-Meier estimated median response duration was 2 years. Seventeen patients discontinued therapy for reasons other than disease progression, and 12 (71%) of 17 maintained responses off-therapy for at least 16 weeks (range, 16 to 56+ weeks). Objective response and toxicity rates were similar to those reported previously; in an extended analysis of all 306 patients treated on this trial (including those with other cancer types), exposure-adjusted toxicity rates were not cumulative., Conclusion: Overall survival following nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced treatment-refractory melanoma compares favorably with that in literature studies of similar patient populations. Responses were durable and persisted after drug discontinuation. Long-term safety was acceptable. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will further assess the impact of nivolumab therapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Purpose: Programmed death-1 (PD-1), an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells, may suppress antitumor immunity. This phase I study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of anti-PD-1 blockade in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors and to preliminarily assess antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates., Patients and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) received a single intravenous infusion of anti-PD-1 (MDX-1106) in dose-escalating six-patient cohorts at 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, followed by a 15-patient expansion cohort at 10 mg/kg. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at 3 months were eligible for repeated therapy., Results: Anti-PD-1 was well tolerated: one serious adverse event, inflammatory colitis, was observed in a patient with melanoma who received five doses at 1 mg/kg. One durable complete response (CRC) and two partial responses (PRs; melanoma, RCC) were seen. Two additional patients (melanoma, NSCLC) had significant lesional tumor regressions not meeting PR criteria. The serum half-life of anti-PD-1 was 12 to 20 days. However, pharmacodynamics indicated a sustained mean occupancy of > 70% of PD-1 molecules on circulating T cells ≥ 2 months following infusion, regardless of dose. In nine patients examined, tumor cell surface B7-H1 expression appeared to correlate with the likelihood of response to treatment., Conclusion: Blocking the PD-1 immune checkpoint with intermittent antibody dosing is well tolerated and associated with evidence of antitumor activity. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens and combinatorial therapies with vaccines, targeted therapies, and/or other checkpoint inhibitors is warranted.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy represents one of the great advances in the field of oncology, highlighted by the Nobel Prize in 2018. Multiple predictive biomarkers for ICI benefit have been proposed. These include assessment of programmed death ligand-1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and determination of mutational genotype (microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency or tumor mutational burden) as a reflection of neoantigen expression. However, deployment of these assays has been challenging for oncologists and pathologists alike., Methods: To address these issues, ASCO and the College of American Pathologists convened a virtual Predictive Factor Summit from September 14 to 15, 2021. Representatives from the academic community, US Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Institutes of Health, health insurance organizations, pharmaceutical companies, in vitro diagnostics manufacturers, and patient advocate organizations presented state-of-the-art predictive factors for ICI, associated problems, and possible solutions., Results: The Summit provided an overview of the challenges and opportunities for improvement in assay execution, interpretation, and clinical applications of programmed death ligand-1, microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient, and tumor mutational burden-high for ICI therapies, as well as issues related to regulation, reimbursement, and next-generation ICI biomarker development., Conclusion: The Summit concluded with a plan to generate a joint ASCO/College of American Pathologists strategy for consideration of future research in each of these areas to improve tumor biomarker tests for ICI therapy.

Background: In a pilot study involving patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, a high percentage of patients had a pathological complete response with the use of two doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab before surgery. Data from a phase 2 study are needed to confirm these findings., Methods: We conducted a phase 2, confirmatory, multicenter, nonrandomized study to evaluate cemiplimab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable stage II, III, or IV (M0) cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients received cemiplimab, administered at a dose of 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to four doses, before undergoing surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (the absence of viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen) on independent review at a central laboratory, with a null hypothesis that a pathological complete response would be observed in 25% of patients. Key secondary end points included a pathological major response (the presence of viable tumor cells that constitute ≤10% of the surgical specimen) on independent review, a pathological complete response and a pathological major response on investigator assessment at a local laboratory, an objective response on imaging, and adverse events., Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant cemiplimab. On independent review, a pathological complete response was observed in 40 patients (51%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 39 to 62) and a pathological major response in 10 patients (13%; 95% CI, 6 to 22). These results were consistent with the pathological responses determined on investigator assessment. An objective response on imaging was observed in 54 patients (68%; 95% CI, 57 to 78). Adverse events of any grade that occurred during the study period, regardless of whether they were attributed to the study treatment, were observed in 69 patients (87%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred during the study period were observed in 14 patients (18%)., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy with cemiplimab was associated with a pathological complete response in a high percentage of patients with resectable cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04154943.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Astronomy was among the first disciplines to embrace Big Data and use it to characterize spatial relationships between stars and galaxies. Today, medicine, in particular pathology, has similar needs with regard to characterizing the spatial relationships between cells, with an emphasis on understanding the organization of the tumor microenvironment. In this article, we chronicle the emergence of data-intensive science through the development of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and describe how analysis patterns and approaches similarly apply to multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) pathology image exploration. The lessons learned from astronomy are detailed, and the new AstroPath platform that capitalizes on these learnings is described. AstroPath is being used to generate and display tumor-immune maps that can be used for mIF immuno-oncology biomarker development. The development of AstroPath as an open resource for visualizing and analyzing large-scale spatially resolved mIF datasets is underway, akin to how publicly available maps of the sky have been used by astronomers and citizen scientists alike. Associated technical, academic, and funding considerations, as well as extended future development for inclusion of spatial transcriptomics and application of artificial intelligence, are also addressed., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Checkpoint immunotherapy is frequently associated with cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs), and among those, the most common subtype shows interface reaction patterns that have been likened to lichen planus (LP); however, cutaneous acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) may be a closer histopathologic comparator. We used quantitative pathology to compare the immunologic composition of anti-PD-1-associated interface reactions to LP and aGVHD to assess for similarities and differences between these cutaneous eruptions., Methods: Immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, CD68, PD-1, and PD-L1 was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from patients with anti-PD-1 interface cirAEs (n = 4), LP (n = 9), or aGVHD (n = 5). Densities of immune cell subsets expressing each marker were quantified using the HALO image analysis immune cell module. Plasma cell and eosinophil density were quantified on routine H&E slides., Results: Specimens from patients with anti-PD-1 interface cirAEs showed equivalent total cell densities and immune cell composition to those with aGVHD. Patients with LP showed higher total immune cell infiltration, higher absolute T-cell densities, increased CD8 proportion, and reduced histiocytic component. The cases with the highest plasma cell counts were all anti-PD-1 interface cirAEs and aGVHD., Conclusion: The composition of immune cell subsets in anti-PD-1 interface cirAEs more closely resembles the immune response seen in aGVHD than LP within our cohort. This warrants a closer look via advanced analytics and may have implications for shared pathogenesis and potential treatment options., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has become an increasingly fundamental modality in the treatment of cancer. The positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibition, especially anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade, in patients with different cancers has focused attention on the potential for other immunotherapeutic approaches. These include inhibitors of additional immune checkpoints, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and therapeutic vaccines. Patients with advanced cancers who previously had limited treatment options available may now benefit from immunotherapies that can offer durable responses and improved survival outcomes. However, despite this, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, especially those with less immunoresponsive cancer types, and there remains a need for new treatment strategies.The virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 1st-2nd, 2021), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer addressed several areas of current research in immunotherapy, including lessons learned from cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy across different cancers, and these are summarised here., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy confers a modest benefit over surgery alone for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early-phase trials, nivolumab-based neoadjuvant regimens have shown promising clinical activity; however, data from phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings., Methods: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC to receive nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes), both evaluated by blinded independent review. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was assessed in all treated patients., Results: The median event-free survival was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2 to not reached) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 20.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 26.7) with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.63; 97.38% CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.005). The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 24.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 31.0) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.6), respectively (odds ratio, 13.94; 99% CI, 3.49 to 55.75; P<0.001). Results for event-free survival and pathological complete response across most subgroups favored nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (99.67% CI, 0.30 to 1.07) and did not meet the criterion for significance. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 83.2% of those in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and 75.4% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group underwent surgery. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and in 36.9% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group., Conclusions: In patients with resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response than chemotherapy alone. The addition of nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events or impede the feasibility of surgery. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 816 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02998528.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Most prostate cancers are "immune cold" and poorly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the mechanisms responsible for the lack of a robust antitumor adaptive immune response in the prostate are poorly understood, which hinders the development of novel immunotherapeutic approaches., Aims: Most inflammatory infiltrates in the prostate are centered around benign glands and stroma, which can confound the molecular characterization of the antitumor immune response. We sought to analytically validate a chromogenic-based multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) approach applicable to whole slide digital image analysis to quantify T cell subsets from the tumor microenvironment of primary prostatic adenocarcinomas. As an initial application, we tested the hypothesis that PTEN loss leads to an altered antitumor immune response by comparing matched regions of tumors within the same individual with and without PTEN loss., Materials & Methods: Using the HALO Image Analysis Platform (Indica Labs), we trained a classifier to quantify the densities of eight T cell phenotypes separately in the tumor epithelial and stromal subcompartments., Results: The iterative chromogenic approach using 7 different antibodies on the same slide provides highly similar findings to results using individually stained slides with single antibodies. Our main findings in carcinomas (benign removed) include the following: i) CD4+ T cells are present at higher density than CD8+ T cells; ii) all T cell subsets are present at higher densities in the stromal compartment compared to the epithelial tumor compartment; iii) most CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are PD1+; iv) cancer foci with PTEN loss harbored increased numbers of T cells compared to regions without PTEN loss, in both stromal and epithelial compartments; and v) the increases in T cells in PTEN loss regions were associated with ERG gene fusion status., Discussion: This modular approach can apply to any IHC-validated antibody combination and sets the groundwork for more detailed spatial analyses., Conclusion: Iterative chromogenic IHC can be used for whole slide analysis of prostate tissue samples and can complement transcriptomic results including those using single cell and spatial genomic approaches., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Cancer immunotherapy can result in lasting tumor regression, but predictive biomarkers of treatment response remain ill-defined. Here, we performed single-cell proteomics, transcriptomics, and genomics on matched untreated and IL2 injected metastases from patients with melanoma. Lesions that completely regressed following intralesional IL2 harbored increased fractions and densities of nonproliferating CD8+ T cells lacking expression of PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 (PD-1-LAG-3-TIM-3-). Untreated lesions from patients who subsequently responded with complete eradication of all tumor cells in all injected lesions (individuals referred to herein as "extreme responders") were characterized by proliferating CD8+ T cells with an exhausted phenotype (PD-1+LAG-3+TIM-3+), stromal B-cell aggregates, and expression of IFNγ and IL2 response genes. Loss of membranous MHC class I expression in tumor cells of untreated lesions was associated with resistance to IL2 therapy. We validated this finding in an independent cohort of metastatic melanoma patients treated with intralesional or systemic IL2. Our study suggests that intact tumor-cell antigen presentation is required for melanoma response to IL2 and describes a multidimensional and spatial approach to develop immuno-oncology biomarker hypotheses using routinely collected clinical biospecimens., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade represents a novel approach for potentially decreasing the risk of recurrence in patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this early phase clincal tiral, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant treatment with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab in patients with nonmetastatic high-risk RCC. Nonprimary endpoints included objective radiographic tumor response rate, immune-related pathologic response rate, quality of life alterations, and metastasis-free and overall survival. In total, 17 patients were enrolled in this study and underwent surgery without a delay after receiving three every-2-wk doses of neoadjuvant nivolumab. Adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 14 (82.4%) patients, with two (11.8%) experiencing grade 3 events. Ten (58.8%) patients experienced an AE of any grade potentially attributable to nivolumab (all grade 1-2), and no grade 4-5 AEs occurred regardless of treatment attribution. The most common AEs were grade 1 fatigue (41.2%), grade 1 pruritis (29.4%), and grade 1 rash (29.4%). All evaluable patients had stable disease as per established radiographic criteria, with one (6.7%) demonstrating features of an immune-related pathologic response. Quality of life remained stable during treatment, with improvements relative to baseline noted at ≥6 mo postoperatively. Metastasis-free survival and overall survival were 85.1% and 100% at 2 yr, respectively. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of preoperative administration of three doses of the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in patients with clinically localized high-risk renal cell carcinoma. We demonstrated the safety of this approach and found that, although most patients will not experience a radiographic response to treatment, a subset may have features of an immune-related pathologic response., (Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) can detail spatial relationships and complex cell phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the analysis and visualization of mIF data can be complex and time-consuming. Here, we used tumor specimens from 93 patients with metastatic melanoma to develop and validate a mIF data analysis pipeline using established flow cytometry workflows (image cytometry). Unlike flow cytometry, spatial information from the TME was conserved at single-cell resolution. A spatial uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was constructed using the image cytometry output. Spatial UMAP subtraction analysis (survivors vs. nonsurvivors at 5 years) was used to identify topographic and coexpression signatures with positive or negative prognostic impact. Cell densities and proportions identified by image cytometry showed strong correlations when compared with those obtained using gold-standard, digital pathology software (R 2 > 0.8). The associated spatial UMAP highlighted "immune neighborhoods" and associated topographic immunoactive protein expression patterns. We found that PD-L1 and PD-1 expression intensity was spatially encoded-the highest PD-L1 expression intensity was observed on CD163 + cells in neighborhoods with high CD8 + cell density, and the highest PD-1 expression intensity was observed on CD8 + cells in neighborhoods with dense arrangements of tumor cells. Spatial UMAP subtraction analysis revealed numerous spatial clusters associated with clinical outcome. The variables represented in the key clusters from the unsupervised UMAP analysis were validated using established, supervised approaches. In conclusion, image cytometry and the spatial UMAPs presented herein are powerful tools for the visualization and interpretation of single-cell, spatially resolved mIF data and associated topographic biomarker development., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

We introduce a new method for single-cell cytometry studies, FAUST, which performs unbiased cell population discovery and annotation. FAUST processes experimental data on a per-sample basis and returns biologically interpretable cell phenotypes, making it well suited for the analysis of complex datasets. We provide simulation studies that compare FAUST with existing methodology, exemplifying its strength. We apply FAUST to data from a Merkel cell carcinoma anti-PD-1 trial and discover pre-treatment effector memory T cell correlates of outcome co-expressing PD-1, HLA-DR, and CD28. Using FAUST, we then validate these correlates in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from the same study, as well as an independent CyTOF dataset from a published metastatic melanoma trial. Finally, we show how FAUST's phenotypes can be used to perform cross-study data integration in the presence of diverse staining panels. Together, these results establish FAUST as a powerful new approach for unbiased discovery in single-cell cytometry., Competing Interests: A patent for the application of the FAUST algorithm to cytometry datasets has been applied for on behalf of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. The research described in this paper was completed while E.G. was conducting research and working at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. E.G. declares ownership interest in Ozette Technologies and was an employee of Ozette Technologies when the manuscript was revised to respond to peer review. G.F. has received consulting income from Takeda and research support from Janssen Pharmaceuticals and declares ownership interest in Ozette Technologies. R.G. has received consulting income from Juno Therapeutics, Takeda, Infotech Soft, and Celgene, has received research support from Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Juno Therapeutics, and declares ownership in Ozette Technologies and Modulus Therapeutics. Trial funds for CITN-07 were in part provided by Celldex. Trial funds for CITN-09 were in part provided by Merck., (© 2021 The Authors.)

PD-1 blockade unleashes CD8 T cells 1 , including those specific for mutation-associated neoantigens (MANA), but factors in the tumour microenvironment can inhibit these T cell responses. Single-cell transcriptomics have revealed global T cell dysfunction programs in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). However, the majority of TIL do not recognize tumour antigens 2 , and little is known about transcriptional programs of MANA-specific TIL. Here, we identify MANA-specific T cell clones using the MANA functional expansion of specific T cells assay 3 in neoadjuvant anti-PD-1-treated non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We use their T cell receptors as a 'barcode' to track and analyse their transcriptional programs in the tumour microenvironment using coupled single-cell RNA sequencing and T cell receptor sequencing. We find both MANA- and virus-specific clones in TIL, regardless of response, and MANA-, influenza- and Epstein-Barr virus-specific TIL each have unique transcriptional programs. Despite exposure to cognate antigen, MANA-specific TIL express an incompletely activated cytolytic program. MANA-specific CD8 T cells have hallmark transcriptional programs of tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells, but low levels of interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R) and are functionally less responsive to interleukin-7 (IL-7) compared with influenza-specific TRM cells. Compared with those from responding tumours, MANA-specific clones from non-responding tumours express T cell receptors with markedly lower ligand-dependent signalling, are largely confined to HOBIT high TRM subsets, and coordinately upregulate checkpoints, killer inhibitory receptors and inhibitors of T cell activation. These findings provide important insights for overcoming resistance to PD-1 blockade., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Emerging data suggest predictive biomarkers based on the spatial arrangement of cells or coexpression patterns in tissue sections will play an important role in precision immuno-oncology. Multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) is ideally suited to such assessments. Standardization and validation of an end-to-end workflow that supports multisite trials and clinical laboratory processes are vital. Six institutions collaborated to: (1) optimize an automated six-plex assay focused on the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, (2) assess intersite and intrasite reproducibility of staining using a locked down image analysis algorithm to measure tumor cell and immune cell (IC) subset densities, %PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and ICs, and PD-1/PD-L1 proximity assessments., Methods: A six-plex mIF panel (PD-L1, PD-1, CD8, CD68, FOXP3, and CK) was rigorously optimized as determined by quantitative equivalence to immunohistochemistry (IHC) chromogenic assays. Serial sections from tonsil and breast carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissue microarrays (TMAs), TSA-Opal fluorescent detection reagents, and antibodies were distributed to the six sites equipped with a Leica Bond Rx autostainer and a Vectra Polaris multispectral imaging platform. Tissue sections were stained and imaged at each site and delivered to a single site for analysis. Intersite and intrasite reproducibility were assessed by linear fits to plots of cell densities, including %PDL1 expression by TCs and ICs in the breast and NSCLC TMAs., Results: Comparison of the percent positive cells for each marker between mIF and IHC revealed that enhanced amplification in the mIF assay was required to detect low-level expression of PD-1, PD-L1, FoxP3 and CD68. Following optimization, an average equivalence of 90% was achieved between mIF and IHC across all six assay markers. Intersite and intrasite cell density assessments showed an average concordance of R 2 =0.75 (slope=0.92) and R 2 =0.88 (slope=0.93) for breast carcinoma, respectively, and an average concordance of R 2 =0.72 (slope=0.86) and R 2 =0.81 (slope=0.68) for NSCLC. Intersite concordance for %PD-L1+ICs had an average R 2 value of 0.88 and slope of 0.92. Assessments of PD-1/PD-L1 proximity also showed strong concordance (R 2 =0.82; slope=0.75)., Conclusions: Assay optimization yielded highly sensitive, reproducible mIF characterization of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis across multiple sites. High concordance was observed across sites for measures of density of specific IC subsets, measures of coexpression and proximity with single-cell resolution., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CB-M, SMJ, and BAF: research support from Bristol Myers Squibb II-ON program, and equipment and supply support from Akoya Biosciences; JT: research support from Bristol Myers Squibb; DLR declares that in the last 2 years, he has served as a consultant to AstraZeneca, Amgen, BMS, Cell Signaling Technology, Cepheid, Daiichi Sankyo, Danaher, GSK, Konica/Minolta, Merck, NanoString, Novartis, PAIGE.AI, PerkinElmer/Akoya Biosciences, Ultivue, and Ventana Medical Systems; BAF declares consulting for Ultivue and Neogenomics and research support from Macrogenics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, OncoSec Medical, and Merck; KR, CW, JM, CC, BR, DL, and CH: all are employees of Akoya Biosciences. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Next-generation tissue-based biomarkers for immunotherapy will likely include the simultaneous analysis of multiple cell types and their spatial interactions, as well as distinct expression patterns of immunoregulatory molecules. Here, we introduce a comprehensive platform for multispectral imaging and mapping of multiple parameters in tumor tissue sections with high-fidelity single-cell resolution. Image analysis and data handling components were drawn from the field of astronomy. Using this "AstroPath" whole-slide platform and only six markers, we identified key features in pretreatment melanoma specimens that predicted response to anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)-based therapy, including CD163 + PD-L1 - myeloid cells and CD8 + FoxP3 + PD-1 low/mid T cells. These features were combined to stratify long-term survival after anti-PD-1 blockade. This signature was validated in an independent cohort of patients with melanoma from a different institution., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)

Improved understanding of tumor immunology has enabled the development of therapies that harness the immune system and prevent immune escape. Numerous clinical trials and real-world experience has provided evidence of the potential for long-term survival with immunotherapy in various types of malignancy. Recurring observations with immuno-oncology agents include their potential for clinical application across a broad patient population with different tumor types, conventional and unconventional response patterns, durable responses, and immune-related adverse events. Despite the substantial achievements to date, a significant proportion of patients still fail to benefit from current immunotherapy options, and ongoing research is focused on transforming non-responders to responders through the development of novel treatments, new strategies to combination therapy, adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches, and the identification of biomarkers of response. These topics were the focus of the virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 2nd-3rd, 2020), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy, in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and are summarised in this report.

Objective: Iatrogenic laryngotracheal stenosis (iLTS) is characterized by fibroinflammatory narrowing of the upper airway and is most commonly caused by intubation injury. Evidence suggests a key role for CD4 T cells in its pathogenesis. The objective of this study is to validate emerging multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) technology for use in the larynx and trachea while quantitatively characterizing the immune cell infiltrate in iLTS. In addition to analyzing previously unstudied immune cell subsets, this study aims to validate previously observed elevations in the immune checkpoint PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 while exploring their spatial and cellular distributions in the iLTS microenvironment., Study Design: Controlled ex vivo cohort study., Setting: Tertiary care center., Methods: mIF staining was performed with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides from 10 patients with iLTS who underwent cricotracheal resection and 10 control specimens derived from rapid autopsy for CD4, CD8, CD20, FoxP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and cytokeratin., Results: There was greater infiltration of CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, CD20 + B cells, FoxP3 + CD4 + Tregs, and FoxP3 + CD8 + early effector T cells in the submucosa of iLTS specimens as compared with controls ( P < .05 for all). PD-1 was primarily expressed on T cells and PD-L1 predominantly on CD4 + cells and "other" cells., Conclusion: This study leverages the power of mIF to quantify the iLTS immune infiltrate in greater detail. It confirms the highly inflammatory nature of iLTS, with CD4 + cells dominating the immune cell infiltrate; it further characterizes the cellular and spatial distribution of PD-1 and PD-L1; and it identifies novel immunologic targets in iLTS.

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are common malignancies caused by carcinogens, including tobacco and alcohol, or infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway are effective against unresectable recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Here, we explored the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in at-risk resectable HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC in the neoadjuvant setting., Methods: The phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial in virus-associated cancers assessed neoadjuvant nivolumab in patients with previously untreated, resectable HPV-positive or HPV-negative HNSCC. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15, with surgery planned by day 29. Safety/tolerability (primary endpoint) was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and surgical delays. Radiographic response was measured before surgery using RECIST v1.1, adapted for a single post-nivolumab evaluation. Pathologic specimens were examined for treatment response using immune-based criteria., Results: From November 2015 to December 2017, 52 patients with AJCC (seventh edition) stage III-IV resectable HNSCC received neoadjuvant nivolumab (26 HPV-positive, 26 HPV-negative). Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 19 patients (73.1%) and 14 patients (53.8%) in the HPV-positive and HPV-negative cohorts, respectively; grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in five (19.2%) and three patients (11.5%), respectively. No patient had a protocol-defined TRAE-related surgical delay (>4 weeks). Thirty-eight patients were reported as undergoing complete surgical resection, 10 had a planned post-nivolumab biopsy instead of definitive surgery due to a protocol misinterpretation, and four did not undergo surgery or biopsy, including two with tumor progression. Radiographic response rates in 49 evaluable patients were 12.0% and 8.3% in the HPV-positive and HPV-negative cohorts, respectively. There were no complete pathologic responses by site or central review in operated patients. Among 17 centrally evaluable HPV-positive tumors, one (5.9%) achieved major pathological response and three (17.6%) achieved partial pathologic response (pPR); among 17 centrally evaluable HPV-negative tumors, one (5.9%) achieved pPR., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant nivolumab was generally safe and induced pathologic regressions in HPV-positive (23.5%) and HPV-negative (5.9%) tumors. Combinatorial neoadjuvant treatment regimens, and continued postoperative therapy for high-risk tumors, are warranted in future trials to enhance the efficacy of this approach., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02488759; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02488759., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RLF reports consulting or advisory from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), MedImmune, Merck, Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, EMD Serono, PPD, Bain Capital Life Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Numab Therapeutics AG, Oncorus, Ono Pharmaceutical, Regeneron, Novasenta, Aduro Biotech, MacroGenics, Nanobiotix, Torque Therapeutics, Lifescience Dynamics, Sanofi, and Zymeworks, Inc; and research funding from BMS, MedImmune, Merck, Tesaro, Novasenta, VentiRx, and AstraZeneca/MedImmune. WCS reports consulting from BMS and Regeneron. RL reports personal and institutional research funding from BMS. AG has nothing to disclose. UMM reports consulting and advisory from MSD Oncology, Roche, BMS, and Celgene; and travel accommodations from BMS, Celgene, Amgen, and Pierre Fabre. CK has nothing to disclose. WS reports honoraria from BMS and Array BioPharma; consulting or advisory from BMS, Novartis, Regeneron, ION Pharma, and Merck; research funding from Novartis, Merck, and Genentech; and institutional research funding from BMS. CHC reports consulting or advisory fees from BMS, CUE Biopharma, Ignyta, Mirati Therapeutics, and Sanofi; research funding from BMS, Ignyta, Lilly, Regeneron, IRX Therapeutics, and Lion Biotechnologies; and travel accommodation expenses from Mirati Therapeutics. LAD reports institutional expert input forum payments from MSD BV Netherlands; and institutional speaker fee payment from BMS. HG has nothing to disclose. SIC has nothing to disclose. LV has nothing to disclose. JMT reports consulting and advisory from BMS, MedImmune, Merck, Compugen, and Akoya Biosciences, and stock options from Akoya Biosciences. JES has nothing to disclose. JL reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. BL reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. TC reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. AB reports employment and stock ownership from BMS. SLT reports consulting or advisory from Five Prime Therapeutics, Immunocore, and Merck; travel accommodations from Five Prime Therapeutics, Merck, and BMS; research funding from BMS; stock ownership by her spouse in Tizona Therapeutics, DNAtrix, RAPT, WindMIL, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Ervaxx, Trieza Therapeutics, and Dracen Pharmaceuticals; consulting or advisory by her spouse in DNAtrix, RAPT, WindMIL, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Ervaxx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Immunomic Therapeutics, Janssen Oncology, and Dynavax Technologies; royalties by her spouse in WindMIL, Immunomic Therapeutics, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, BMS, and NexImmune; and research funding by her spouse from Compugen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Approximately 15% of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) respond to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies. Tumor PD-L1 expression and human papillomavirus (HPV) status have been proposed as biomarkers to identify patients likely to benefit from these treatments. We aimed to understand the potential immune effects of HPV in HNSCC and to characterize additional potentially targetable immune-regulatory pathways in primary, treatment-naïve tumors. CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, PD-1, PD-L2, LAG-3, IDO-1, and GITR cell densities were determined in 27 HNSCC specimens. IHC for PD-L1 assessed percentage of positive tumor cells and immune cells separately or as a combined positive score (CPS), and whether PD-L1 was expressed in an adaptive or constitutive pattern (i.e., PD-L1+ tumor cells juxtaposed to TILs or in the absence of TILs, respectively). HPV testing with p16 IHC was confirmed by HPV genotyping. When compared to HPV(-) tumors (n = 14), HPV+ tumors (n = 13) contained significantly higher densities of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, and PD-1+ cells (P < 0.02), and there was a trend towards increased density of FoxP3 + cells. PD-L1 expression patterns did not vary by tumor viral status, suggesting possible heterogeneous mechanisms driving constitutive vs adaptive PD-L1 expression patterns in HNSCC. IDO-1 expression was abundant (> 500 IDO-1+ cells/mm 2 in 17/27 specimens) and was found on tumor cells as well as immune cells in 12/27 (44%) cases (range 5-80% tumor cells+). Notably, the studied markers varied on a per-patient basis and were not always related to the degree of T cell infiltration. These findings may inform therapeutic co-targeting strategies and raise consideration for a personalized treatment approach.

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer associated with poor survival. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors have shown high rates of durable tumor regression compared with chemotherapy for MCC. The current study was undertaken to assess baseline and on-treatment factors associated with MCC regression and 3-year survival, and to explore the effects of salvage therapies in patients experiencing initial non-response or tumor progression after response or stable disease following first-line pembrolizumab therapy on Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network-09/KEYNOTE-017., Methods: In this multicenter phase II trial, 50 patients with advanced unresectable MCC received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Patients were followed for a median of 31.8 months., Results: Overall response rate to pembrolizumab was 58% (complete response 30%+partial response 28%; 95% CI 43.2 to 71.8). Among 29 responders, the median response duration was not reached (NR) at 3 years (range 1.0+ to 51.8+ months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 4.6 to 43.4) and the 3-year PFS was 39.1%. Median OS was NR; the 3-year OS was 59.4% for all patients and 89.5% for responders. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, greater per cent tumor reduction, completion of 2 years of treatment and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with response and longer survival. Among patients with initial disease progression or those who developed progression after response or stable disease, some had extended survival with subsequent treatments including chemotherapies and immunotherapies., Conclusions: This study represents the longest available follow-up from any first-line anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapy in MCC, confirming durable PFS and OS in a proportion of patients. After initial tumor progression or relapse following response, some patients receiving salvage therapies survived. Improving the management of anti-PD-(L)1-refractory MCC remains a challenge and a high priority., Trial Registration Number: NCT02267603., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PN reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and EMD-Serono; advisory fees from EMD-Serono, Pfizer and Merck & Co.; travel expenses from Sanofi/Regeneron and Merck & Co. and has a pending patent related to high-affinity T-cell receptors that target the Merkel polyomavirus. SB reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD-Serono and personal fees and other from Sanofi-Genzyme; grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD-Serono, Merck & Co., NantKwest, Novartis, Immune Design, Oncosec, Exicure, Nektar; and personal fees from Castle Biosciences. EJ reports grants from Merck & Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi/Regeneron; personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Array BioPharma, Macrogenics, Sanofi/Regeneron and Genentech. RK reports grants from Merck & Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb and Regeneron; advisory fees from Merck & Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Regeneron, Novartis and Array. ASB reports personal fees from Bayer, Deciphera and EMD Serono. BAH reports grants from Merck & Co., Tempest Therapeutics, Olatec Therapeutics, A*STAR Singapore, Sanofi, Leap Therapeutics, GSK and AstraZeneca; personal fees from Merck & Co., Novartis, G1 Therapeutics and CE Concepts; travel fees from ASCO and ASCI and patents related to dendritic cell vaccines, immunotherapy biomarkers and methods for augmenting anti-PD-1 therapy. CC reports a pending patent related to high-affinity T-cell receptors that target the Merkel polyomavirus. JT reports consulting/advisory fees from Merck & Co, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca and Compugen; and a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. EJ, MK and BHM are employees of Merck & Co. SPF reports research funding from Merck. MAC reports research funding from Merck & Co. SLT reports that she or an immediate family member has stock and other ownership interests in Aduro Biotech, DNAtrix, Dracen Pharmaceuticals, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Ervaxx, Five Prime Therapeutics, Potenza Therapeutics, RAPT, Tizona Therapeutics, Trieza Therapeutics and WindMIL; a consulting or advisory role in Amgen, DNAtrix, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Dynavax, Ervaxx, Five Prime Therapeutics, Immunocore, Immunomic Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MedImmune/AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., RAPT and WindMIL; research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Compugen; patents, royalties and/or other intellectual property with Aduro Biotech, Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunomic Therapeutics, NexImmune and WindMIL and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dragonfly and Five Prime Therapeutics., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Tremendous progress has been made in treating patients with metastatic melanoma over the past decade. In that timeframe, the FDA has approved 12 novel treatments for patients with advanced unresectable melanoma, comprising both kinase-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and five treatments for adjuvant (postoperative) use in patients with high-risk resectable stage III melanoma. It is not known whether outcomes can be further improved by administering kinase inhibitors or ICI in the neoadjuvant (presurgical) setting in patients with high-risk resectable melanomas. Noting research community interest in exploring the neoadjuvant approach for treating melanoma and recognizing that early harmonization of methodologies may expedite the development of therapeutics in this space, the FDA and Melanoma Research Alliance convened a public workshop on November 6, 2019, in National Harbor, Maryland, to discuss key issues. The workshop consisted of 23 faculty and included more than 250 live participants. Topics discussed included opportunities for advancing novel endpoints for regulatory purposes as well as translational research, clinical trial design considerations, and strategies for optimizing patient selection while mitigating risk., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The melanoma treatment landscape changed in 2011 with the approval of the first anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 checkpoint inhibitor and of the first BRAF-targeted monoclonal antibody, both of which significantly improved overall survival (OS). Since then, improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. The approval of new immune and targeted therapies has further improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma and other combination modalities are also being explored such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy and surgery. In addition, different strategies of drugs administration including sequential or combination treatment are being tested. Approaches to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response are being developed. Increasing evidence emerges that tissue and blood-based biomarkers can predict the response to a therapy. The latest findings in melanoma research, including insights into the tumor microenvironment and new biomarkers, improved understanding of tumor immune response and resistance, novel approaches for combination strategies and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, were the focus of discussions at the Melanoma Bridge meeting (5-7 December, 2019, Naples, Italy), which are summarized in this report.

Purpose: Preclinical studies suggest PARP inhibition (PARPi) induces immunostimulatory micromilieu in ovarian cancer thus complementing activity of immune checkpoint blockade. We conducted a phase II trial of PARPi olaparib and anti-PD-L1 durvalumab and collected paired fresh core biopsies and blood samples to test this hypothesis., Patients and Methods: In a single-center, proof-of-concept phase II study, we enrolled women aged ≥18 with recurrent ovarian cancer. All patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve and had measurable disease per RECISTv1.1, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate organ and marrow function. Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1,500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Translational objectives included biomarker evaluation for relationships with clinical response and immunomodulatory effects by treatment., Results: Thirty-five patients with ovarian cancer [median, four prior therapies (IQR, 2-5.5), predominantly platinum-resistant (86%), BRCA wild-type (77%)] received at least one full cycle of treatment. ORR was 14% [5/35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8%-30.3%]. Disease control rate (PR+SD) was 71% (25/35; 95% CI, 53.7%-85.4%). Treatment enhanced IFNγ and CXCL9/CXCL10 expression, systemic IFNγ/TNFα production, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, indicating an immunostimulatory environment. Increased IFNγ production was associated with improved PFS [HR, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16-0.87), P = 0.023], while elevated VEGFR3 levels were associated with worse PFS (HR, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.23-8.40), P = 0.017]., Conclusions: The PARPi and anti-PD-L1 combination showed modest clinical activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. Our correlative study results suggest immunomodulatory effects by olaparib/durvalumab in patients and indicate that VEGF/VEGFR pathway blockade would be necessary for improved efficacy of the combination., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer commonly driven by the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). The programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunosuppressive pathway is often upregulated in MCC, and advanced metastatic MCC frequently responds to PD-1 blockade. We report what we believe to be the first trial of anti-PD-1 in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable MCC., Methods: In the phase I/II CheckMate 358 study of virus-associated cancer types, patients with resectable MCC received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15. Surgery was planned on day 29. Tumor regression was assessed radiographically and microscopically. Tumor MCPyV status, PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were assessed in pretreatment tumor biopsies., Results: Thirty-nine patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIA-IV resectable MCC received ≥ 1 nivolumab dose. Three patients (7.7%) did not undergo surgery because of tumor progression (n = 1) or adverse events (n = 2). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18 patients (46.2%), and grade 3-4 events in 3 patients (7.7%), with no unexpected toxicities. Among 36 patients who underwent surgery, 17 (47.2%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Among 33 radiographically evaluable patients who underwent surgery, 18 (54.5%) had tumor reductions ≥ 30%. Responses were observed regardless of tumor MCPyV, PD-L1, or TMB status. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months, median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were not reached. RFS significantly correlated with pCR and radiographic response at the time of surgery. No patient with a pCR had tumor relapse during observation., Conclusion: Nivolumab administered approximately 4 weeks before surgery in MCC was generally tolerable and induced pCRs and radiographic tumor regressions in approximately one half of treated patients. These early markers of response significantly predicted improved RFS. Additional investigation of these promising findings is warranted.

Background: Pneumonitis from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a potentially fatal immune-related adverse event (irAE) from antiprogrammed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 immunotherapy. Most cases of ICI pneumonitis improve or resolve with 4-6 weeks of corticosteroid therapy. Herein, we report the incidence, clinicopathological features and management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma who developed chronic ICI pneumonitis that warrants ≥12 weeks of immunosuppression., Methods: Patients with ICI pneumonitis were identified from institutional databases of ICI-treated patients with advanced melanoma and NSCLC between January 2011 and July 2018. ICI pneumonitis was defined as clinical/radiographic evidence of lung inflammation without alternative diagnoses, adjudicated by a multidisciplinary team. Chronic ICI pneumonitis was defined as pneumonitis that persists or worsens with steroid tapering, and necessitates ≥12 weeks of immunosuppression, after ICI discontinuation. Serial chest CT was used to assess radiological features, and tumor response by Response EvaluationCriteria for Solid Tumors V.1.1. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were assessed by cell differential. Lung biopsy samples were evaluated by H&E staining and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF), where available., Results: Among 299 patients, 44 developed ICI pneumonitis (NSCLC: 5/205; melanoma: 1/94), and of these, 6 experienced chronic ICI pneumonitis. The overall incidence of chronic ICI pneumonitis was thus 2%. Of those who developed chronic ICI pneumonitis: the majority had NSCLC (5/6), all sustained disease control from ICIs, and none had other concurrent irAEs. Timing of chronic ICI pneumonitis development was variable (range: 0-50 months), and occurred at a median of 12 months post ICI start. Recrudescence of ICI pneumonitis occurred at a median of 6 weeks after initial steroid start (range: 3-12 weeks), with all patients requiring steroid reintroduction when tapered to ≤10 mg prednisone/equivalent. The median total duration of steroids was 37 weeks (range: 16-43+weeks). Re-emergence of radiographic ICI pneumonitis occurred in the same locations on chest CT, in most cases (5/6). All patients who developed chronic ICI pneumonitis had BALF lymphocytosis on cell differential and organising pneumonia on lung biopsy at initial ICI pneumonitis presentation, with persistent BALF lymphocytosis and brisk CD8+ infiltration on mIF at pneumonitis re-emergence during steroid taper., Conclusions: A subset of patients who develop pneumonitis from ICIs will develop chronic ICI pneumonitis, that warrants long-term immunosuppression of ≥12 weeks, and has distinct clinicopathological features., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JN: research funding: AstraZeneca, Merck, Consulting/Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb. EL: research funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Regeneron, Consulting/Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, EMD Serono, Array BioPharma, MacroGenics, Sanofi. PMF: research funding: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Kyowa, Novartis, Consulting/Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Boehringer. LBY: research funding: Rocket Medical, Consulting/Advisory Board: Boston Scientific. HL: Consulting/Advisory Board: Boston Scientific; DFK/Advisory Board: Consulting: Boston Scientific. JT: research funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consulting/Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca. JRB: research funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consulting/Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Genentech, and reports receiving commercial., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)