Search

Purpose: The purpose of this project was to identify common and best practices for safe nail care among nail care providers., Design: Descriptive study using online survey., Subjects and Setting: The study was conducted by 2 credentialed foot and wound care nurses within a large Midwest healthcare system. Participants were nurses and physicians who provide nail care to patients and individuals in the hospital and community setting such as private homes and nursing homes and hospice agencies., Methods: Email invitations with a link to the survey were sent to eligible individuals and organizations in which wound care specialists were employed. Information about the survey was posted on the Certified Foot Care Specialty homepage, and on the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN) Members-only Forum and Facebook page., Results: An estimated 1000 surveys were sent of which 246 surveys were returned. Fifty-three percent (121/229) of respondents were certified through the WOCN Certification Board and 41% (93/229) were certified through the American Foot Care Nurse Association. Most respondents reported using some form of self-protection when filing (225/246, 91.5%), trimming (215/246; 87.4%), or using a rotary tool (204/246, 82.9%) on patients' nails. However, approximately one-fourth of respondents reported offering some type of protection for patients when filing (63/246, 25.6%), trimming (41/246, 16.7%), or using a rotary tool (64/246, 26.0%). Most of the nurses surveyed provided nail care in outpatient and foot care clinics, acute care settings, private homes, and nursing homes/hospice., Conclusions: When providing nail care, the patient/client protections should closely mirror the personal protective equipment used by the nurse. Future research is needed to contribute to a national consensus guideline for best practices and protections at all levels of nail care in the acute care and community settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.)

Developmental scientists have examined the independent effects of peer presence, social cues, and rewards on adolescent decision-making and cognitive control. Yet, these contextual factors often co-occur in real world social situations. The current study examined the combined effects of all three factors on cognitive control, and its underlying neural circuitry, using a task to better capture adolescents' real world social interactions. A sample of 176 participants ages 13-25, was scanned while performing an adapted go/no-go task alone or in the presence of a virtual peer. The task included brief positive social cues and sustained periods of positive arousal. Adolescents showed diminished cognitive control to positive social cues when anticipating a reward in the presence of peers relative to when alone, a pattern not observed in older participants. This behavioral pattern was paralleled by enhanced orbitofrontal activation. The results demonstrate the synergistic impact of social and reward influences on cognitive control in adolescents., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Developmental differences regarding decision making are often reported in the absence of emotional stimuli and without context, failing to explain why some individuals are more likely to have a greater inclination toward risk. The current study (N=212; 10-25y) examined the influence of emotional context on underlying functional brain connectivity over development and its impact on risk preference. Using functional imaging data in a neutral brain-state we first identify the "brain age" of a given individual then validate it with an independent measure of cortical thickness. We then show, on average, that "brain age" across the group during the teen years has the propensity to look younger in emotional contexts. Further, we show this phenotype (i.e. a younger brain age in emotional contexts) relates to a group mean difference in risk perception - a pattern exemplified greatest in young-adults (ages 18-21). The results are suggestive of a specified functional brain phenotype that relates to being at "risk to be risky.", (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of fecal incontinence (FI) and its associated risk factors in acutely ill adult hospitalized patients., Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to collect data at 2 time points in 7 hospitals in the Midwestern United States. An investigator-developed tool was used by trained data collectors to identify pertinent patient characteristics, the presence of FI, and potential associated factors., Results: The prevalence of FI in the 1083 patients assessed was 20% (n = 221). Prevalence rates from the 7 individual hospitals ranged from 16% to 30%. Medications were the most common associated factor (49%; n = 109), followed by neurologic diseases (40%; n = 89), and bowel motility disorders (30%; n = 67). The majority of patients with FI had stool consistency described as "loose unformed" (59%; n = 130) or "liquid" (25%; n = 55). Many patients had multiple potential risk factors for FI; 48% (n = 107) had 1 associated factor, 37% (n = 82) had 2 associated factors, and 8% (n = 18) had 3 or more associated factors. Age was associated with an increased likelihood of FI; the chances for FI increase 1.7% with each year of age. Unit type was also a significant associated with FI; patients managed in the intensive care unit were 78% more likely to have FI as compared to patients care for in a medical-rehabilitation unit., Conclusions: Fecal incontinence is a common problem in hospitalized adult patients. Previously identified risk factors were also found in our sample.