Search

Tegaserod (1-{[(5-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)methyliden]amino}-3-pentylguanidine) is a potent agonist at human recombinant 5-HT4 serotonin receptors. Consequently, tegaserod is utilized in the treatment of bowel diseases. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that tegaserod stimulates human cardiac atrial 5-HT4-receptors via cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathways. Tegaserod exerted positive inotropic effects (PIEs) and positive chronotropic effects (PCEs) in isolated left and right atrial preparations, respectively, from mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of the human 5-HT4 serotonin receptor (5-HT4-TG) in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. However, no effect was observed in the hearts of littermates of wild-type mice (WT). Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of 5-HT4 receptors was significantly higher in 5-HT4-TG mice compared to WT mice. The specificity of the signal for the 5-HT4 receptor was confirmed by the absence of the signal in the hearts of 5-HT4 receptor knockout mice. Furthermore, tegaserod increased the force of contraction (at concentrations as low as 10 nM), reduced the time of tension relaxation, and increased the rate of tension development in isolated electrically stimulated (at a rate of 60 beats per minute) human right atrial preparations (HAPs, obtained during open-heart surgery) when administered alone. The potency and efficacy of tegaserod to raise the force of contraction were enhanced in the presence of cilostamide, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor. The positive inotropic effect of tegaserod in HAPs was found to be attenuated by the 5-HT4 serotonin receptor antagonist GR 125487 (0.1 µM). The efficacy of tegaserod (10 µM) in raising the force of contraction in HAPs was less pronounced than that of serotonin (10 µM) or isoprenaline (1 µM). Tegaserod shifted the concentration–response curve of the force of contraction to serotonin to the right in HAPs, indicating that it is a partial agonist at 5-HT4 serotonin receptors in this model. We propose that the mechanism of action of tegaserod in HAPs involves cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of cardiac regulatory proteins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut–brain interaction associated with significant disease burden. This American Gastroenterological Association guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of medications for the pharmacological management of IBS-C and is an update of a prior technical review and guideline. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The technical review panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of the following agents: tenapanor, plecanatide, linaclotide, tegaserod, lubiprostone, polyethylene glycol laxatives, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antispasmodics. The Guideline Panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations. The panel agreed on 9 recommendations for the management of patients with IBS-C. The panel made a strong recommendation for linaclotide (high certainty) and conditional recommendations for tenapanor, plecanatide, tegaserod, and lubiprostone (moderate certainty), polyethylene glycol laxatives, tricyclic antidepressants, and antispasmodics (low certainty). The panel made a conditional recommendation against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (low certainty). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tegaserod is a 5-HT 4 receptor agonist approved for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in women <65 years of age without a history of cardiovascular ischemic events. Safety data are presented from 2 external adjudications from the 2018 Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee meeting supporting tegaserod's reintroduction after its voluntary 2007 withdrawal. Withdrawal was based on an internal adjudication using pooled placebo-controlled tegaserod data to identify potential cardiovascular ischemic signals. An independent committee conducted an external adjudication to evaluate 24 possible cardiovascular ischemic events (tegaserod: n = 20; placebo: n = 4) identified internally. A second independent external adjudication further evaluated these events. A total of 18,645 patients were included (tegaserod: n = 11,614; placebo: n = 7031). The first adjudication identified 14 (0.075%) events (tegaserod: n = 13 [0.11%]; placebo: n = 1 [0.014%]). All patients had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, and 11 had ≥2. The second adjudication identified 390 events, 24 (0.13%) were classified as probable new or worsening events (tegaserod: 18 [0.16%]; placebo: 6 [0.09%]). For tegaserod, 7 (0.06%) were coronary or cerebrovascular ischemic events compared with 1 (0.01%) for placebo (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–34.74; P =.273). All tegaserod patients reporting cardiovascular events had ≥1 risk, including cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, ≥55 years of age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking. Women <65 years of age without a history of cardiovascular ischemic events and ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor receiving tegaserod experienced no major adverse cardiovascular event(s). Two independent, external adjudications suggest that tegaserod is safe for women <65 years of age with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, no history of cardiovascular ischemic events, and ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background New therapies are urgently needed in melanoma particularly in late-stage patients not responsive to immunotherapies and kinase inhibitors. Methods Drug screening, IC50 determinations as well as synergy assays were detected by the MTT assay. Apoptosis using Annexin V and 7AAD staining was assessed using flow cytometry. TUNEL staining was performed using immunocytochemistry. Changes in phosphorylation of key molecules in PI3K/Akt/mTOR and other relevant pathways were detected by western blot as well as immunocytochemistry. To assess in vivo anti-tumor activity of Tegaserod, syngeneic intravenous and subcutaneous melanoma xenografts were used. Immunocytochemical staining was performed to detect expression of active Caspase-3, cleaved Caspase 8 and p-S6 in tumors. Evaluation of immune infiltrates was carried out by flow cytometry. Results Using a screen of 770 pharmacologically active and/or FDA approved drugs, we identified Tegaserod (Zelnorm, Zelmac) as a compound with novel anti-cancer activity which induced apoptosis in murine and human malignant melanoma cell lines. Tegaserod (TM) is a serotonin receptor 4 agonist (HTR4) used in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). TM’s anti-melanoma apoptosis-inducing effects were uncoupled from serotonin signaling and attributed to PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling inhibition. Specifically, TM blunted S6 phosphorylation in both BRAFV600E and BRAF wildtype (WT) melanoma cell lines. TM decreased tumor growth and metastases as well as increased survival in an in vivo syngeneic immune-competent model. In vivo, TM also caused tumor cell apoptosis, blunted PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and decreased S6 phosphorylation. Furthermore TM decreased the infiltration of immune suppressive regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells and FOXP3 and ROR-γt positive CD4+ T cells. Importantly, TM synergized with Vemurafenib, the standard of care drug used in patients with late stage disease harboring the BRAFV600E mutation and could be additively or synergistically combined with Cobimetinib in both BRAFV600E and BRAF WT melanoma cell lines in inducing anti-cancer effects. Conclusion Taken together, we have identified a drug with anti-melanoma activity in vitro and in vivo that has the potential to be combined with the standard of care agent Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib in both BRAFV600E and BRAF WT melanoma.

Polysialic acid (PSA), a polymer of alpha-2,8 linked sialic acid residues, is a negatively charged macromolecular glycan mainly attached to neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM). Studies have shown that PSA is not only essential for the development of normal brain circulation, but also for synaptic plasticity, learning and memory in adults. Although the occurrence, features, biosynthesis, and physiological roles of PSA and related effects on related diseases, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer, have been well reviewed, the important roles of PSA and its mimics in the regeneration of the nervous system following injury have not been well discussed. As a consequence, this article comprehensively reviews the effects of small organic compounds that simulate PSA, such as tegaserod and 5-nonyloxytryptamine (5-NOT), on the nervous system of mammals, suggesting that these mimetics may have tremendous therapeutic potential, especially for strategies aimed at tissue repair after injury of the nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tegaserod, a gastroprokinetic agent, is used to treat irritable bowel syndrome. Despite its extensive clinical use, little is known about the effects of tegaserod on vascular ion channels, especially K+ channels. Therefore, we examined the effects of tegaserod on voltage‐gated K+ (Kv) channels in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells using the whole‐cell patch‐clamp technique. Tegaserod inhibited Kv channels in a concentration‐dependent manner with an IC50 value of 1.26 ± 0.31 µmol/L and Hill coefficient of 0.81 ± 0.10. Although tegaserod had no effect on the steady‐state activation curves of the Kv channels, the steady‐state inactivation curve was shifted toward a more negative potential. These results suggest that tegaserod inhibits Kv channels by influencing their voltage sensors. The recovery time constant of channel inactivation was extended in the presence of tegaserod. Furthermore, application of train steps (1 and 2 Hz) in the presence of tegaserod progressively increased the inhibition of Kv currents suggesting that tegaserod‐induced Kv channel inhibition is use (state)‐dependent. Pretreatment with a Kv1.5 subtype inhibitor suppressed the Kv current. However, additional application of tegaserod did not induce further inhibition. Pretreatment with a Kv2.1 or Kv7 inhibitor did not affect the inhibitory effect of tegaserod on Kv channels. Based on these results, we conclude that tegaserod inhibits vascular Kv channels in a concentration‐ and use (state)‐dependent manner independent of its own functions. Furthermore, the major Kv channel target of tegaserod is the Kv1.5 subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tegaserod, an orally active, potent 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 serotonin receptor agonist, was previously indicated for irritable bowel syndrome but was voluntarily withdrawn due to potential cardiovascular side effects. In vitro studies suggested that tegaserod increased platelet aggregation, but these results were not reproduced or were inconclusive. We sought to assess ex vivo effects of tegaserod on platelet aggregation. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, we randomized a majority of healthy patients with no history of cardiovascular risk factors (n = 21) to receive tegaserod or matching placebo for 7 + 2 days followed by a 7- to 10-day washout period, and then patients were crossed over to the other study drug for the next 7 + 2 days. Unstimulated and agonist-stimulated platelet aggregation; P-selectin expression; serum thromboxane (Tx)B2 and urinary 11-dehydro (11-dh) TxB2; and tegaserod and M29.0 concentrations were serially assessed. Results: There was no significant difference in percentage change in unstimulated or adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and ADP + serotonin-, collagen- and thrombin receptor activating peptide--induced maximum platelet aggregation and in platelet P-selectin expression in the presence of tegaserod at any time point when compared to placebo. Similarly, there was no significant difference in percentage change in serum TxB2 or urinary 11-dhTxB2 levels between placebo and tegaserod. No new or unexpected findings were observed in evaluations of safety or pharmacokinetic parameters. Conclusion: This comprehensive pharmacodynamic study, by employing established markers used in prior investigations, which have been considered by the Food and Drug Administration to indicate drug-related platelet effects, does not demonstrate any influence of tegaserod treatment on platelet function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: New therapies are urgently needed in melanoma particularly in late-stage patients not responsive to immunotherapies and kinase inhibitors. Methods: Drug screening, IC50 determinations as well as synergy assays were detected by the MTT assay. Apoptosis using Annexin V and 7AAD staining was assessed using flow cytometry. TUNEL staining was performed using immunocytochemistry. Changes in phosphorylation of key molecules in PI3K/Akt/mTOR and other relevant pathways were detected by western blot as well as immunocytochemistry. To assess in vivo anti-tumor activity of Tegaserod, syngeneic intravenous and subcutaneous melanoma xenografts were used. Immunocytochemical staining was performed to detect expression of active Caspase-3, cleaved Caspase 8 and p-S6 in tumors. Evaluation of immune infiltrates was carried out by flow cytometry. Results: Using a screen of 770 pharmacologically active and/or FDA approved drugs, we identified Tegaserod (Zelnorm, Zelmac) as a compound with novel anti-cancer activity which induced apoptosis in murine and human malignant melanoma cell lines. Tegaserod (TM) is a serotonin receptor 4 agonist (HTR4) used in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). TM's anti-melanoma apoptosis-inducing effects were uncoupled from serotonin signaling and attributed to PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling inhibition. Specifically, TM blunted S6 phosphorylation in both BRAFV600E and BRAF wildtype (WT) melanoma cell lines. TM decreased tumor growth and metastases as well as increased survival in an in vivo syngeneic immune-competent model. In vivo, TM also caused tumor cell apoptosis, blunted PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and decreased S6 phosphorylation. Furthermore TM decreased the infiltration of immune suppressive regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells and FOXP3 and ROR-γt positive CD4+ T cells. Importantly, TM synergized with Vemurafenib, the standard of care drug used in patients with late stage disease harboring the BRAFV600E mutation and could be additively or synergistically combined with Cobimetinib in both BRAFV600E and BRAF WT melanoma cell lines in inducing anti-cancer effects. Conclusion: Taken together, we have identified a drug with anti-melanoma activity in vitro and in vivo that has the potential to be combined with the standard of care agent Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib in both BRAFV600E and BRAF WT melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: As an analogue of uroguanylin plecanatide binds to the Guanylate Cyclase-C receptor activating fluid and ion secretion in the small intestine with the same pH-dependent binding kinetics as the natural ligand. Plecanatide has been FDA approved as safe and effective for the indications of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C). Areas covered: All clinical trial results supporting approval of plecanatide in IBS-C are reported, evaluated and interpreted in the context of the complex pathophysiology of functional diseases and the barriers that must be overcome for appropriate protocol design and conduct. Expert opinion: The Expert Opinion section discusses safety and efficacy of plecanatide for IBS-C. Broader consideration of some of the inherent challenges in understanding and treating functional gastrointestinal disorders includes: 1. the difficulty of understanding diseases with complex pathophysiology that clinically present with a few simple symptoms, 2. exploring the pathophysiology of functional diseases using pharmacophysiology, 3. value of 'Set Theory' in the evaluation of complex clinical data and 4. physiologic and pathophysiologic insight gained by evaluation 'physiologic redundancy' and 'conservation of function'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objectives are to review the role of pharmacogenomics in drug metabolism of medications typically used in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) focusing predominantly on cytochrome P450 metabolism. Other aims are to provide examples of genetic variation of receptors or intermediary pathways that are targets for IBS drugs and to critically appraise the situations where precision medicine is impacting health in IBS. Pharmacogenomics impacts both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Although large clinical trials have not incorporated testing for genetic variations that could impact the efficacy of medications in IBS, there are therapeutic advantages to inclusion of pharmacogenomics testing for individual patients, as has been demonstrated particularly in the treatment with central neuromodulators in psychiatry practice. Clinical practice in IBS is moving in the same direction with the aid of commercially available tests focused on drug metabolism. Specific mechanisms leading to pathophysiology of IBS are still poorly characterized, relative to diseases such as cancer and inflammatory bowel disease, and, therefore, pharmacogenomics related to drug pharmacodynamics is still in its infancy and requires extensive future research. With increased attention to pharmacogenomics affecting drug metabolism, it is anticipated that pharmacogenomics will impact care of IBS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects 5-20% of all individuals around the world. In Mexico (Veracruz), a prevalence of 16.9% has been documented. Its diagnosis is based on the Rome III criteria, and its treatment has different approaches; within the pharmacological options are the serotonin receptor agonist drugs (5-HT4). The effectiveness of tegaserod has been established in patients with IBS with constipation (IBS-C), considering prucalopride as a drug with therapeutic potential for this condition, since it shows greater affinity for the 5-HT4 receptor than tegaserod, and accelerates colonic transit. However, more data from randomized controlled trials that prove this are required. Objective: To compare the efficacy of prucalopride versus tegaserod in the treatment of irritable bowel with constipation, by means of the Bristol scale, the global scale of symptoms and associated symptoms. Material and methods: Two groups of patients were established (A and B) in a randomized manner: men and women between 18 and 50 years of age with Rome criteria III for IBS-C; all were given the same diet. In group A, Prucalopride was administered at a dose of 2 mg orally every 24 hours for two weeks. In group B, 6 mg of tegaserod were administered every 12 hours for two weeks. The clinical evolution of each patient was assessed each week during the two weeks of the study period, including the assessments of the adapted and validated Bristol scale, and the global scale of symptoms and associated symptoms. Results: Twenty-two patients were included, 21 (95.5%) female, with a 1:21 ratio; the average age was 37.27 years; 11 (50%) received prucalopride, and the rest, tegaserod. To evaluate the association between the treatment given and the symptoms of «rectal fullness, evacuation effort and evacuation urgency», Fisher's exact test was used, being not statistically significant (p > 0.05); for «abdominal distension, abdominal movements and Bristol scale», Mann-Whitney U was used, being not statistically significant (p > 0.05); however, for «abdominal pain», with the same test, a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.05). Of those treated with prucalopride, one (9%) had diarrhea, three (27%) headache, and one (9%) headache and nausea; with tegaserod, two (18%) had diarrhea, two (18%) headache, and one (9%) headache and nausea. Conclusions: Both, prucalopride and tegaserod improve to some degree all the symptoms evaluated for IBS-C, but prucalopride significantly and more promptly improves the symptom of «abdominal pain». It was evidenced that the diarrhea event implied change of treatment in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]