Search

In the article, the authors discuss the effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in gastroenterology. Also cited are the gastrointestinal (GI) involvement and manifestations of infection, the temporal relationship between fever/respiratory symptoms and onset of GI symptoms, as well as the possible chronic or recurrent GI symptoms in GI patients like inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome.

Background: Statins have multiple benefits in patients with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)., Aim: To explore the effects of statins on the long-term risk of all-cause mortality, liver-related clinical events (LREs) and liver stiffness progression in patients with MASLD., Methods: This cohort study collected data on patients with MASLD undergoing at least two vibration-controlled transient elastography examinations at 16 tertiary referral centres. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between statin usage and long-term risk of all-cause mortality and LREs stratified by compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD): baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM) of ≥10 kPa. Liver stiffness progression was defined as an LSM increase of ≥20% for cACLD and from <10 kPa to ≥10 or LSM for non-cACLD. Liver stiffness regression was defined as LSM reduction from ≥10 kPa to <10 or LSM decrease of ≥20% for cACLD., Results: We followed up 7988 patients with baseline LSM 5.9 kPa (IQR 4.6-8.2) for a median of 4.6 years. At baseline, 40.5% of patients used statins, and cACLD was present in 17%. Statin usage was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR=0.233; 95% CI 0.127 to 0.426) and LREs (adjusted HR=0.380; 95% CI 0.268 to 0.539). Statin usage was also associated with lower liver stiffness progression rates in cACLD (HR=0.542; 95% CI 0.389 to 0.755) and non-cACLD (adjusted HR=0.450; 95% CI 0.342 to 0.592), but not with liver stiffness regression (adjusted HR=0.914; 95% CI 0.778 to 1.074)., Conclusions: Statin usage was associated with a relatively lower long-term risk of all-cause mortality, LREs and liver stiffness progression in patients with MASLD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TC-FY reported serving as an advisory committee member and a speaker for Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work. EAT reported receiving personal fees as advisory board member for Boehringer, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Siemens; receiving speaker fees from Echosens, Novo Nordisk and AbbVie outside the submitted work. HH reported personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bristol Myers-Squibb, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from KOWA and personal fees from GW Phara outside the submitted work, and grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Echosens, grants from Gilead Sciences, grants from Intercept, grants from MSD, grants from Novo Nordisk and grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. JB reported receiving grants and personal fees from Echosens outside the submitted work. JLC reported receiving other from Echosens Clinical Trials during the conduct of the study; grants from Roche Pharma and other from Gilead Advisory Board outside the submitted work. WKC reported serving as consultant or advisory board member for Zuellig Pharma, Abbott, Roche, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk; and a speaker for Novo Nordisk, Abbott, Echosens, Viatris and Hisky Medical. AJS reported receiving grants from Intercept, personal consulting fees from Gilead, grants from Merck, personal consulting fees from Pfizer, grants and personal consulting fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Histoindex, and stock options from Genfit, Tiziana, Durect, Inversago and personal consulting fees from Genentech, ALnylam, Regeneron, Zydus, LG chem, Hanmi, Madrigal, Path AI, 89 Bio and stock options from Galmed outside the submitted work. VdL reported receiving non-financial support from Echosens during the conduct of the study. PNN reported receiving grants from Novo Nordisk, advisory board and personal consulting fees, honoraria for lectures and travel expenses from Novo Nordisk, personal consulting and advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Intercept, Poxel Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Sun Pharma, Eli Lilly, Madrigal, GSK and non-financial support for educational events from AiCME outside the submitted work. LC reported receiving personal fees for consulting and speakers bureau from Echosens during the conduct of the study; personal consultancy fees from Boston pharmaceutical and Gilead, speaker bureau and consultancy personal fees from GSK, personal speaker bureau fees from Inventiva, personal consultancy fees from Madrigal, personal Consultancy fees from MSD and Novo Nordisk, personal consultancy fees from Pfizer, Sagimet and Siemens Healthineers outside the submitted work. CF reported being in the full-time employment of Echosens during the conduct of the study. GL-HW reported receiving personal fees from Echosens during the conduct of the study; grants from Gilead Sciences Research outside the submitted work. MS-WC reported being in the full-time employment of Echosens during the conduct of the study. MR-G reported receiving personal fees from Echosens outside the submitted work. SUK reported personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Echosens, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work, and grants from AbbVie, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and grants from Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work. VW-SW reported receiving personal speaker fees from Abbott, consultant and speaker fees from AbbVie, personal consultant fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, grants from Gilead Sciences, personal consultant fees from Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, personal consultant fees from Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, personal speaker fees from Unilab, personal consultant fees from Visirna, and being a cofounder of Illuminatio outside the submitted work. CDB has received grant support from Echosens. No other disclosures were reported., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. It is important to develop noninvasive tests to assess the disease severity and prognosis., Objective: To study the prognostic implications of baseline levels and dynamic changes of the vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)-based scores developed for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis (Agile 3+) and cirrhosis (Agile 4) in patients with MASLD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data from a natural history cohort of patients with MASLD who underwent VCTE examination at 16 tertiary referral centers in the US, Europe, and Asia from February 2004 to January 2023, of which the data were collected prospectively at 14 centers. Eligible patients were adults aged at least 18 years with hepatic steatosis diagnosed by histologic methods (steatosis in ≥5% of hepatocytes) or imaging studies (ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, or controlled attenuation parameter ≥248 dB/m by VCTE)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was liver-related events (LREs), defined as hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic decompensation (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatorenal syndrome), liver transplant, and liver-related deaths. The Agile scores were compared with histologic and 8 other noninvasive tests., Results: A total of 16 603 patients underwent VCTE examination at baseline (mean [SD] age, 52.5 [13.7] years; 9600 [57.8%] were male). At a median follow-up of 51.7 (IQR, 25.2-85.2) months, 316 patients (1.9%) developed LREs. Both Agile 3+ and Agile 4 scores classified fewer patients between the low and high cutoffs than most fibrosis scores and achieved the highest discriminatory power in predicting LREs (integrated area under the time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.89). A total of 10 920 patients (65.8%) had repeated VCTE examination at a median interval of 15 (IQR, 11.3-27.7) months and were included in the serial analysis. A total of 81.9% of patients (7208 of 8810) had stable Agile 3+ scores and 92.6% of patients (8163 of 8810) had stable Agile 4 scores (same risk categories at both assessments). The incidence of LREs was 0.6 per 1000 person-years in patients with persistently low Agile 3+ scores and 30.1 per 1000 person-years in patients with persistently high Agile 3+ scores. In patients with high Agile 3+ score at baseline, a decrease in the score by more than 20% was associated with substantial reduction in the risk of LREs. A similar trend was observed for the Agile 4 score, although it missed more LREs in the low-risk group., Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study suggest that single or serial Agile scores are highly accurate in predicting LREs in patients with MASLD, making them suitable alternatives to liver biopsy in routine clinical practice and in phase 2b and 3 clinical trials for steatohepatitis.

The landscape of ulcerative colitis has changed in the last two decades. Advancements in pharmacotherapeutics have heralded the introduction of new treatment options, with many agents in development. Better clinical outcomes are seen with tighter disease control, made possible with greater understanding of inflammatory pathways and their blockade with drugs. There has been a resultant shift in treatment targets, beyond symptoms to endoscopic and histological healing. Controlling the burden of disease activity also lowers the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening now requires the use of dye-based agents and high-definition colonoscopy to improve the detection of colonic neoplasms., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Singapore Medical Journal.)

Parental iron replacement is given to patients with severe iron deficiency or intolerance to oral iron. Hypophosphataemia has been reported to occur as a complication of parental iron replacement, and is postulated to be related to the carbohydrate moieties used in the parenteral preparations. Hypophosphataemia is under-diagnosed as symptoms such as fatigue, muscle weakness and poor effort tolerance mimic anaemia. Severe hypophosphataemia (<0.32 mmol/l) can result in significant complications such as confusion, rhabdomyolysis and arrhythmias. We report a patient with recurrent admissions for non-specific symptoms attributed to iron deficiency anaemia who received multiple doses of parenteral ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). He was found to have severe hypophosphataemia, with further evaluation showing increased renal phosphate wasting and elevated serum levels of fibroblast-growth-factor 23 (FGF23). FCM was stopped and he was given high-dose oral iron supplementation, with no further episodes of hypophosphataemia., Learning Points: The carbohydrate moieties used in parenteral iron preparations are different, and may have a dose-dependent relationship with the development of hypophosphataemia.The mechanism by which hypophosphataemia occurs after parenteral iron replacement is related to increased serum levels of FGF23, which increases renal phosphate wasting.The serum phosphate levels of patients receiving parenteral iron replacement (especially ferric carboxymaltose or iron polymaltose) should be routinely monitored for hypophosphataemia, which is an under-diagnosed complication., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests., (© EFIM 2020.)

Patients with liver cirrhosis are at increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and are placed on routine surveillance for HCC. Diagnosis algorithms are in place to guide clinicians in the evaluation of liver lesions detected during surveillance. Radiological assessments are critical with diagnostic criteria based on identification of typical hallmarks of HCCs on multiphasic computed tomography (CT) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We report a patient with a hypervascular exophytic lesion indeterminate for HCC on CT imaging. While the detection of an exophytic arterially-enhancing lesion in an at-risk patient on CT imaging may prompt clinicians to treat the lesion as HCC without further evaluation, the patient underwent contrast-enhanced MRI with the lesion being eventually diagnosed as an exophytic haemangioma. Thus, no further action was necessary and the patient was continued on routine HCC surveillance., Learning Points: Radiological surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is routine in patients at risk of HCC.Diagnosis algorithms that are in place for indeterminate lesions detected during HCC surveillance should be adhered to in order to achieve an accurate diagnosis.Sequential imaging with contrast-enhanced (gadoxetate) MRI should be used to obviate the need for an invasive biopsy when an exophytic lesion indeterminate for HCC is identified during CT imaging in a patient with liver cirrhosis, especially when a hepatic haemangioma remains a differential diagnosis., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests., (© EFIM 2020.)