Search

Background It is unknown whether there is an advantage to using the wet-suction or slow-pull technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with new-generation needles. We aimed to compare the performance of each technique in EUS-FNB. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, crossover trial including patients with solid lesions of ≥ 1 cm. Four needle passes with 22 G fork-tip or Franseen-type needles were performed, alternating the wet-suction and slow-pull techniques in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the histological yield (samples containing an intact piece of tissue of at least 550 μm). Secondary end points were sample quality (tissue integrity and blood contamination), diagnostic accuracy, and adequate tumor fraction. Results Overall, 210 patients with 146 pancreatic and 64 nonpancreatic lesions were analyzed. A tissue core was retrieved in 150 (71.4 %) and 129 (61.4 %) cases using the wet-suction and the slow-pull techniques, respectively (P = 0.03). The mean tissue integrity score was higher using wet suction (P = 0.02), as was the blood contamination of samples (P < 0.001). In the two subgroups of pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions, tissue core rate and tissue integrity score were not statistically different using the two techniques, but blood contamination was higher with wet suction. Diagnostic accuracy and tumor fraction did not differ between the two techniques. Conclusion Overall, the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNB resulted in a higher tissue core procurement rate compared with the slow-pull method. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of samples with adequate tumor fraction were similar between the two techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has evolved significantly over the past two decades. For GIST size smaller than 5 cm, laparoscopic resection has become the current standard. To avoid postoperative gastric deformity and preserve gastric function, laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) was developed and various modifications have been reported and utilized successfully. Pure endoscopic resection techniques have also been reported at a similar period of time, which further push the boundary of incisionless surgery in managing these lesions. Both tunneling and nontunneling exposed type endoscopic full thickness resection are well described procedures for resection of small UGI GIST. In this review, a summary of these procedures is provided, and the pros and cons of each technique from the perspective of a surgical endoscopist are discussed in detail. LECS and endoscopic resection are complementary to each other. The choice of technique should be tailored to the location, morphology, and size of the target lesions, taking into account the experience of the laparoscopic surgeons and endoscopists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is now firmly established as the best option for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). It has high clinical efficacy, similar to surgical and percutaneous approaches, but with lower morbidity and costs. It is superior to non-EUS-guided approaches because even collections without endoluminal bulging can be successfully drained. Transmural drainage alone is sufficient for pseudocysts, but in the context of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), adjunctive direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) may be required. Traditionally, double pigtail plastic stents (PS) were used for transmural drainage, but, recently, fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMS) customized for PFC drainage have become available and are increasingly used, especially in the management of WON, because the larger-diameter stent facilitates drainage and insertion of an endoscope into the WON cavity for DEN. The present review will discuss the evidence for EUS-guided drainage and DEN, the technical problems involved, and the roles of PS and FCSEMS in PFC drainage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cystic dilatation of the terminal ventral main pancreatic duct was first termed Wirsungocele in 2004 following an incidental finding [1]. In conclusion, this is the first video-reported case of a Wirsungocele with recurrent acute pancreatitis that was successfully treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos References 1 Abu-Hamda E. M., Baron T. H. Cystic dilatation of the intraduodenal portion of the duct of Wirsung (Wirsungocele). [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Biliary cystadenomas are complicated cystic lesions of the liver. They are rare and pose considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Methods: We present our experience managing these lesions by performing a retrospective review of all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of or histologically proven biliary cystadenoma who underwent surgery between January 1995 and January 2005 at our institution. Altogether, 20 patients (16 women, 4 men) with a mean age of 58 years underwent a total of 22 operations. The diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma was based on exclusion of other pathologic entities and the presence of radiologic characteristics of biliary cystadenoma. Abdominal ultrasonography (US), computed tomography, or both were performed in all patients. US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology was performed in seven patients and all of them were negative for malignancy. A preoperative diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma was made in 16 patients based on clinical and radiologic features and was correct in 6 of them. Diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma was not suspected in four patients. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy was 30%. Enucleation was the most common surgical procedure and was performed in 10 patients. The mean follow-up period was 5.5 ± 2.8 years. No recurrence was detected in patients with confirmed biliary cystadenoma after adequate excision. Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight the difficulty with preoperative diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma, which has seldom been discussed in the literature. Preoperative differentiation by means of radiologic imaging is inaccurate (30%). Any therapy short of complete excision leads to local recurrence and risk of malignant transformation. Complete excision of any suspicious lesion remains the best method of diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents case study of a 50-year-old man who underwent endoscopic salvage of a duodenal stump leak and surgical transection of the ampulla. It mentions information on observation of extensive progression of the tumor upon computed tomography (CT) scan. It states that internal biliary drainage was achieved by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing stent.

The author reflects on endoscopic alternatives such as endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‑guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) to cure Percutaneous cholecystostomy or percutaneous transhepatic gall bladder drainage (PTGBD) where patients suffer from acute cholecystitis.

The article presents a case study of a 60-year-old man who was admitted for the surgery and treatment of rupture of esophagus.

The article presents case study of a 87-year-old man with multiple medical co-morbidities and gallbladder carcinoma. It is noted that the case is also the first description of a gallbladder adenocarcinoma discovered through endoscopy. It is noted that the patient was initially found having distended gallbladder with gallstones and acute cholecystitis.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is an alternative for biliary drainage in patients with obstructive pancreaticobiliary pathology when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not feasible. Despite its effectiveness, EUS-HGS is associated with a significant risk of adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a newly designed dedicated cautery-enhanced tubular self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for EUS-HGS., Methods: This multicenter prospective study included patients with malignant biliary obstruction in whom ERCP had failed because of tumor infiltration, inability to drain the intrahepatic ducts, or surgically altered anatomy. A dedicated cautery-enhanced tubular SEMS was used for EUS-HGS. Technical and clinical success rates, procedure times, and adverse events were evaluated., Results: 20 patients underwent EUS-HGS with the dedicated stent. Technical and clinical success rates of 100% were achieved, with no reported severe adverse events or mortality. The median procedure time was 16 minutes. Recurrent biliary obstruction was observed in 1 patient., Conclusions: The dedicated cautery-enhanced tubular SEMS for EUS-HGS can simplify the procedure and enhance its safety and efficacy. This innovation shows promise for improving patient outcomes, although further studies are needed to validate these findings in a broader patient population., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as first-line interventions in distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). We assessed the efficacy and safety of these two approaches., Methods: A PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases bibliographic search until 01/12/2023 was performed to identify RCTs comparing EUS-BD to ERCP for primary biliary drainage in inoperable patients with DMBO. Primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, adverse events (AEs), mean procedure time, 1-year stent patency, and overall survival. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effect model., Results: Five studies (519 patients) were included. The RR for pooled technical success in EUS-BD was 1.06 ([0.96-1.17]; P=0.27) and 1.02 [0.97-1.08]; P=0.45) for clinical success. 1-year stent patency was similar among the two groups (RR 1.15; [0.94-1.42], P=0.17), with lower reintervention in the EUS-BD group (RR 0.58; [0.37-0.9]; P=0.01). The RR of AEs rate was 0.85 [0.49-1.46]; P=0.55) and severe AEs of 0.97 [0.10-0.17]; P=0.98). On subgroup analysis, EUS-lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) outperformed ERCP in term of technical success (RR 1.17; [1.01-1.35]; P=0.03). Procedure time was lower in EUS-BD (standardized mean difference -2.36 minutes; [-2.68 to -2.05]; P<0.001)., Conclusions: EUS-BD showed a statistically significant lower re-intervention rate compared to ERCP, but with similar technical success rate, stent patency, clinical success rate and safety profile, while in the subgroup of EUS-LAMS, the technical success was better than ERCP Keywords: distal; biliary obstruction; efficacy; safety., Competing Interests: Bertrand Napoleon is giving teaching session for Taewong Company and received consultancy from Boston Scientific; Andrea Lisotti, Pietro Fusaroli and Fabien Fumex received consultancy from Boston Scientific Corporation. Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh received consultancy from Boston Scientific, Cook, Taewoong, Microtech, and MI Tech Medical Corporations. The remaining authors have nothing to report., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Benedetto Mangiavillano received a fee for a speech from Taewoong; Khanh Do-Kong Pham is consultant for Taewoong, MITech and Cook medical; Stefano Francesco Crinò received a grant from Steris Endoscop Anthony Teoh is s a consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook, Taewoong, Microtech and MI Tech Medical Corporations. Mark Anthony De Lusong is consultant for Boston Scientific, Fujifilm and Olympus; Alessandro Repici is consultant for Boston Scientific, Fujifilm and Medtronic; Alberto Larghi is consultant for Boston Scientific, Pentax and MITech. The other Authors have no conflict of interest to declare

Introduction:  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) using the Hot-Axios device has recently been associated with a significant risk of bleeding. This adverse event (AE) seems to occur less frequently with the use of a different device, the Spaxus stent. The aim of the current study was to compare the rates of bleeding between the two stents., Methods:  Patients admitted for treatment of PFCs by EUS plus lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 endoscopy referral centers between 10 July 2019 and 28 February 2022 were identified and their outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis., Results:  363 patients were evaluated. After a 1-to-1 propensity score match, 264 patients were selected (132 per group). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred in the Hot-Axios group than in the Spaxus group (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P  = 0.03); stent type was a significant predictor of bleeding in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses ( P  = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Bleeding necessitating arterial embolization did not however differ significantly between the two groups (3.0% vs. 0%; P  = 0.12). In addition, the Hot-Axios was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall AEs compared with the Spaxus stent (9.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.04)., Conclusion:  Our study showed that, in patients with PFCs, bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred significantly more frequently with use of the Hot-Axios stent than with the Spaxus stent, although this was not the case for bleeding requiring embolization., Competing Interests: Benedetto Mangiavillano received a fee for a speech from Taewoong; Khanh Do-Kong Pham is consultant for Taewoong, MITech and Cook medical; Stefano Francesco Crinò received a grant from Steris Endoscop Anthony Teoh is s a consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook, Taewoong, Microtech and MI Tech Medical Corporations. Mark Anthony De Lusong is consultant for Boston Scientific, Fujifilm and Olympus; Alessandro Repici is consultant for Boston Scientific, Fujifilm and Medtronic; Alberto Larghi is consultant for Boston Scientific, Pentax and MITech. The other Authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view., Competing Interests: None

Background: Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) can be useful for difficult bile duct stone clearance. Large prospective multinational data on POCS-guided lithotripsy for clearing difficult bile duct stones in a single session of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are missing., Methods: Patients with difficult bile duct stones (defined as one or more of: largest stone diameter ≥ 15 mm, failed prior attempt at stone clearance, impacted, multiple, hepatic duct location, or located above a stricture) were enrolled at 17 centers in 10 countries. The principal endpoint was stone clearance in a single ERCP procedure using POCS. RESULTS : 156 patients underwent 174 sessions of POCS-guided electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy. Stone clearance had failed in a previous ERCP using traditional techniques in 124/156 patients (80 %), while 32 /156 patients (21 %) were referred directly to POCS-guided therapy based on preprocedural assessment of the difficulty of stone clearance. In 101/156 patients (65 %), there were impacted stones. POCS-guided stone clearance was achieved in a single POCS procedure in 125 /156 patients (80 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 73 % - 86 %), and was significantly more likely for stones ≤ 30 mm compared with > 30 mm (odds ratio 7.9, 95 %CI 2.4 - 26.2; P  = 0.002). Serious adverse events occurred in 3/156 patients (1.9 %, 95 %CI 0.4 % - 5.5 %), and included pancreatitis, perforation due to laser lithotripsy, and cholangitis (n = 1 each), all resolved within 1 week., Conclusion: POCS-guided lithotripsy is highly effective for clearance of difficult bile duct stones in a single procedure and successfully salvages most prior treatment failures. It may also be considered first-line therapy for patients with difficult choledocholithiasis to avoid serial procedures., Competing Interests: Dr. Anthony Teoh is a paid consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd., Cook Medical, and Micro-Tech Europe. Dr. Benedict Devereaux is a member of the speakers’ bureau of Boston Scientific Corporation. Joyce Peetermans, PhD, Pooja G. Goswamy, and Matthew Rousseau are employees of Boston Scientific Corporation, the sponsor of this registry. Dr. Takao Itoi is a consultant to Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus Corporation, Fujifilm Corporation, and Gadelius Medical. All other authors disclose no financial or other relationships related to the work described in this manuscript., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)