Search

We present a tephra stratigraphical and tephrochronological record from eight lakes in Vestfirðir, NW Iceland. About 50 tephra units have been identified, representing nearly 30 eruptive events originating from five volcanic systems: Hekla, Katla, Snæfellsjökull, Grímsvötn and Veiðivötn‐Bárðarbunga. Most of the tephra layers originate from Grímsvötn, although there is a prominent presence of andesitic to basaltic tephra layers from Hekla in the record. We propose that the previously described Brattihjalli tephra is actually the 6060‐year‐old Hekla Ö tephra marker layer, recording a more north‐westerly dispersal than before and providing new correlation possibilities across Iceland. Thus, the Hekla Ö tephra covers as large an area in Iceland as the Hekla 5, Hekla 4, Hekla 3 and Hekla 1104 tephra layers, emphasizing its importance as a chronological marker. The tephra markers Hekla 1693, V877/Settlement layer, Sn‐1, Hekla 3 and Hekla 4 have been found and, additionally, our study identifies four potential tephra markers, the Katla D1 ∼2750 cal a BP, Katla D2 ∼3700 cal a BP, Reykjarfjörður tephra ∼8800 cal a BP and Dagverðardalur tephra ∼9300–9500 cal a BP. Our data reveal several new tephra layers in Vestfirðir, including chronological markers important for dating and correlation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Knowledge of temporal patterns of past explosive eruptions is necessary to understand possible future eruptive behavior. However, volcanic records based on geological reconstructions remain incomplete. This inference is true not only for remote and sparsely populated areas like the Aleutian or Kurile-Kamchatka arcs, but also for Europe, where past large explosive events are continuously recognized in the geological record. Here we report the first age and geochemical data on the violent middle to late Pleistocene explosive eruptions from the Elbrus volcanic center (Greater Caucasus), which towers over the densely populated regions in southern Russia and Georgia. We attribute six disparate ash deposits found in the terrestrial and marine sediments along the SE European margin to the Elbrus volcanic center based on major and trace element compositions of individual shards of volcanic glass and radiogenic Sr-Nd-Pb isotope compositions of bulk tephra. We suggest that these deposits represent products of five different eruptions that were dispersed over distances of more than 150–560 km from their source. Three of four eruptions are dated at 522 ± 36, 258 ± 13, and 84.6 ± 7.4 ka by a combined zircon U–Th–Pb and (U–Th)/He approach. One sample revealed an overdispersed spectrum of single crystal (U–Th)/He dates with an average of 176 ± 40 ka. Zircon characteristics and statistical deconvolution of the geochronology data suggest that this sample contains zircon crystals from two different eruptions tentatively dated at 156.5 ± 7.7 ka and 222.8 ± 13 ka. These eruption ages represent the first recognition of a suite of large pumiceous eruptions from the Elbrus volcanic center postdating the previously known explosive activity, documented by ∼800 ka old welded tuffs. These data also provide the first geochemical and geochronological characterization of both proximal and distal Elbrus tephra glasses and contribute to the global tephra database, permitting the identification of Elbrus tephras in distal terrestrial and marine paleoenvironmental archives and hence their use as paleoclimate and archaeological markers. We consider the significance of the identified tephras for paleoenvironmental research and show their potential for tephrochronological studies in the East European Plain and adjacent areas. • First age and geochemical data on tephra from the Elbrus volcanic center (Caucasus). • Four large silicic explosive eruptions from Elbrus identified between 500 and 85 ka. • Elbrus tephra deposits found at distances of 150–560 km from the source. • Dated Elbrus tephras may serve as markers for paleoenvironmental research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper introduces the aims and scope of the RESET project ( RES ponse of humans to abrupt E nvironmental T ransitions), a programme of research funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (UK) between 2008 and 2013; it also provides the context and rationale for papers included in a special volume of Quaternary Science Reviews that report some of the project's findings. RESET examined the chronological and correlation methods employed to establish causal links between the timing of abrupt environmental transitions (AETs) on the one hand, and of human dispersal and development on the other, with a focus on the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic periods. The period of interest is the Last Glacial cycle and the early Holocene (c. 100–8 ka), during which time a number of pronounced AETs occurred. A long-running topic of debate is the degree to which human history in Europe and the Mediterranean region during the Palaeolithic was shaped by these AETs, but this has proved difficult to assess because of poor dating control. In an attempt to move the science forward, RESET examined the potential that tephra isochrons, and in particular non-visible ash layers (cryptotephras), might offer for synchronising palaeo-records with a greater degree of finesse. New tephrostratigraphical data generated by the project augment previously-established tephra frameworks for the region, and underpin a more evolved tephra ‘lattice’ that links palaeo-records between Greenland, the European mainland, sub-marine sequences in the Mediterranean and North Africa. The paper also outlines the significance of other contributions to this special volume: collectively, these illustrate how the lattice was constructed, how it links with cognate tephra research in Europe and elsewhere, and how the evidence of tephra isochrons is beginning to challenge long-held views about the impacts of environmental change on humans during the Palaeolithic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: At the northwest end of the Lake Turkana Basin (northern Kenya Rift), intensive fieldwork conducted on the Plio-Pleistocene fluvio-lacustrine Nachukui Formation by the National Museums of Kenya and the West Turkana Archaeological Project (WTAP), led to the discovery of more than 50 archaeological sites aged between 2.4 and 0.7Ma. Among them is the Lokalalei archaeological site complex, which includes the two oldest archaeological sites (2.34Ma) found in the Kenyan segment of the East African Rift System. The environmental background of the two sites was described as a succession of ephemeral streams with floodplain palaeosols in which the archaeological sites are situated, bordering the western bank of a large axial meandering river flowing southward. The Lokalalei 1 (LA1) and Lokalalei 2C (LA2C) archaeological sites are of extreme importance in terms of knowledge of hominins’ knapping activities. The stratigraphic position of the LA1 and LA2C sites as well as implications on the technical differences between the two sites have been successively discussed by . In terms of stratigraphic position, Lokalalei 2C was estimated to be slightly higher in the section (i.e. younger) than Lokalalei 1. An alternative stratigraphic correlation was proposed by , who suggested that LA2C site should have been approximately 100,000years younger than LA1. New considerations on the stratigraphy and environmental context of the Lokalalei sites have been developed following controversy on the stratigraphic position and time interval between the LA1 and LA2C sites. High-resolution lithostratigraphic work based on bed-to-bed field correlations, facies sedimentology and tephra geochemistry confirms that the LA2C site is slightly higher in the section than the LA1 site by about 11.20m. This represents a time interval of ∼74,000years based on an assumed sedimentation rate of 152mm/ka. Sedimentary facies analysis indicates that the hominin occupation sites were situated in the vicinity of a lagoon/embayment environment close to the shoreline of an open lake. This lake was part of the broad lake development described across East Africa during the 2.7–2.4Ma period. Palaeontological data associated with the sites suggest at the LA1 site a lake margin habitat, and at the LA2 sites an habitat with poor and sparse vegetation along channels of an alluvial fan system landward of the lake margin. They also confirm the aridity trend mentioned at the global scale for this period, which is demonstrated in the upper Lokalalei sediment sequence by progradation of an alluvial fan environment over the lake shoreline. Associated conglomeratic deposits could have been the source from which the knappers collected their raw materials. In addition, rapid variations from humid to arid episodes in a unique environment such as the East African Rift may have had a major influence in controlling hominin evolution. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The Longgang volcanic field, located in northeastern China, is volcanically active with a number of eruptions during the Quaternary but the chronology of the eruptions is poorly defined. Some tephra layers are well preserved in the annually laminated sediments of maar lakes in the region, and facilitate the construction of a much improved chronological framework for the volcanic history of the area. The results of our investigations reveal that three basaltic explosive eruptions occurred at AD 460, 11460calyr BP and 14000calyr BP, respectively. The largest explosive basaltic eruption (AD 460) produced a thick black scoria layer in the Longgang volcanic field, including lakes. The tephra distribution and chronological data suggest that this eruption is likely to be from the Jinlongdingzi volcano. Two basaltic flood eruptions occurred at Jinlongdingzi. The earlier basaltic eruption produced a lava flow that spread over a forest and encased standing trees. Two radiocarbon ages obtained from charcoal samples collected from the burned remains of these trees are 1828–1989calyr BP and 2164–2359calyr BP. In the most recent stage of volcanism, the lava flow extended only ca. 2km, and flowed into Lake Dalongwan. From the present status of the forest ecosystem, which has not yet reached the fully mature successional stage, we estimate that this lava is very young (ca. a few hundreds years old). Jinlongdingzi is a potentially dangerous volcano. Monitoring and assessment of the potential hazards in the Longgang volcanic field should be carried out in the future. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Twelve definable cryptotephra layers younger than c. 8600 cal. BP are reported from lacustrine core material taken from An Loch Mo or, Inis Oírr, Aran Islands, western Ireland. The geochemistry of these shard layers, which represent more Holocene tephras than previously geochemically characterized from any European site outside the proximal volcanic influence of Italy or Iceland, is presented. Of these tephras, four may correlate with known Iceland-derived tephra horizons (Vo 1477, H1, Lairg A and H5); one appears to have two possible named correlatives (Hoy; 'Lairg B' at Sluggan Bog, N Ireland); another has a plausible correlative (AD 860 A); but two others represent Icelandic tephras apparently not previously reported on Iceland itself, including a tephra that has geochemistry very similar to H1 (AD 1104) but which dates to c. cal. AD 840. Four tephras that date from the period c. AD 40-1400 have a distinct geochemical signature that relates to Jan Mayen, 750 km to the northeast of Iceland and some 1800 km distant from An Loch Mór. The results contribute substantially to the chronology of the sediments from An Loch Mór and, at the international level, to the tephrostratigraphy of the northeast Atlantic region. The well-attested Icelandic H4 tephra (from a Hekla eruption of c. 4260 cal. BP) was not recorded; it is suggested that An Loch Mór lies south of its recordable distribution in this part of the northeast Atlantic region. Taken together with work at other sites, the findings point to a wealth of potential tephra isochrons in Holocene deposits of the northeast Atlantic seaboard. It is clear also that calcareous lake sediments can be as fruitful a source of tephras as peats. Potential problems relating to dating and geochemical fingerprinting of tephra layers in individual sites are highlighted with reference to the Lairg tephras as recorded in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and to the Hoy tephra that has been described from Orkney. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]