Search

Somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibiting factor) is an abundant neuropeptide, which acts on five subtypes of somatostatin receptor (SST1-SST5; nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Somatostatin Receptors [98]). Activation of these receptors produces a wide range of physiological effects throughout the body including the inhibition of secretion of many hormones. Endogenous ligands for these receptors are somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14) and somatostatin-28 (SRIF-28). cortistatin-14 has also been suggested to be an endogenous ligand for somatostatin receptors [61].

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease that results in motor and cognitive dysfunction, leading to early death. HD is caused by an expansion of CAG repeats in the huntingtin gene (HTT). Here, we review the mouse models of HD. They have been used extensively to better understand the molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis as well as to provide non-human subjects to test the efficacy of potential therapeutics. The first and best-studied in vivo rodent model of HD is the R6/2 mouse, in which a transgene containing the promoter and exon 1 fragment of human HTT with 150 CAG repeats was inserted into the mouse genome. R6/2 mice express rapid, robust behavioral pathologies and display a number of degenerative abnormalities in neuronal populations most vulnerable in HD. The first conditional full-length mutant huntingtin (mHTT) mouse model of HD was the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mouse model of HD (BACHD), which expresses human full-length mHTT with a mixture of 97 CAG-CAA repeats under the control of endogenous HTT regulatory machinery. It has been useful in identifying the role of mHTT in specific neuronal populations in degenerative processes. In the knock-in (KI) model of HD, the expanded human CAG repeats and human exon 1 are inserted into the mouse Htt locus, so a chimera of the full-length mouse protein with the N-terminal human portion is expressed. Many of aspects of the pathology and behavioral deficits in the KI model better mimic disease characteristics found in HD patients than other models. Accordingly, some have proposed that these mice may be preferable models of the disease over others. Indeed, as our understanding of HD advances, so will the design of animal models to test and develop HD therapies.

Introduction: Neurodegenerative diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Neurodegeneration is gradual over time, characterized by neuronal death that causes deterioration of cognitive or motor functions, ultimately leading to the patient's death. Currently, there are no treatments that effectively slow the progression of any neurodegenerative disease, but improved microscopy assays and models for neurodegeneration could lead the way to the discovery of disease-modifying therapeutics. Areas covered: Herein, the authors describe cell-based assays used to discover drugs with the potential to slow neurodegeneration, and their associated disease models. They focus on microscopy technologies that can be adapted to a high-throughput screening format that both detect cell death and monitor early signs of neurodegeneration and functional changes to identify drugs that the block early stages of neurodegeneration. Expert opinion: Many different phenotypes have been used in screens for the development of therapeutics towards neurodegenerative disease. The context of each phenotype in relation to neurodegeneration must be established to identify therapeutics likely to successfully target and treat disease. The use of improved models of neurodegeneration, statistical analyses, computational models, and improved markers of neuronal death will help in this pursuit and lead to better screening methods to identify therapeutic compounds against neurodegenerative disease.

Somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibiting factor) is an abundant neuropeptide, which acts on five subtypes of somatostatin receptor (SST1-SST5; nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Somatostatin Receptors [89]). Activation of these receptors produces a wide range of physiological effects throughout the body including the inhibition of secretion of many hormones. Endogenous ligands for these receptors are somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14) and somatostatin-28 (SRIF-28). cortistatin-14 has also been suggested to be an endogenous ligand for somatostatin receptors [56].

Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) is a complex disease presenting as a spectrum of clinical disorders with progressive degeneration of frontal and temporal brain cortices and extensive neuroinflammation that result in personality and behavior changes, and eventually, death. There are currently no effective therapies for FTD. While 60-70% of FTD patients are sporadic cases, the other 30-40% are heritable (familial) cases linked to mutations in several known genes. We focus here on FTD caused by mutations in the GRN gene, which encodes a secreted protein, progranulin (PGRN), that has diverse roles in regulating cell survival, immune responses, and autophagy and lysosome function in the brain. FTD-linked mutations in GRN reduce brain PGRN levels that lead to autophagy and lysosome dysfunction, TDP43 accumulation, excessive microglial activation, astrogliosis, and neuron death through still poorly understood mechanisms. PGRN insufficiency has also been linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD), and so the development of therapeutics for GRN-linked FTD that restore PGRN levels and function may have broader application for other neurodegenerative diseases. This review focuses on a strategy to increase PGRN to functional, healthy levels in the brain by identifying novel genetic and chemical modulators of neuronal PGRN levels. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'The Quest for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders'.

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) provide several advantages for drug discovery, but principally they provide a source of clinically relevant tissue. Furthermore, the use of HiPSCs cultured in three-dimensional (3D) systems, as opposed to traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture approaches, better represents the complex tissue architecture in vivo. The use of HiPSCs in 3D spheroid and organoid culture is now growing, but particularly when using myocardial, intestinal enteric nervous system, and retinal cell lines. However, organoid cell culture is perhaps making the most notable impact in research and drug discovery, in which 3D neuronal cell cultures allow direct modeling of cortical cell layering and neuronal circuit activity. Given the specific degeneration seen in discrete neuronal circuitry in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), HiPSC culture systems are proving to be a major advance. In the present review, the second part of a two-part review, we discuss novel methods in which 3D cell culture systems (principally organoids) are now being used to provide insights into disease mechanisms. (The use of HiPSCs in target identification was reviewed in detail in Part 1.).

Epigenetic control of the transciptome is a complex and highly coordinated cellular process. One critical mechanism involves DNA methylation, mediated by distinct but related DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). Although several DNMT inhibitors are available, most are nonselective; selective DNMT inhibitors, therefore, could be optimal as therapeutics, as well acting as chemical probes to elucidate the fundamental biology of individual DNMTs. DNA methylation is a stable chemical modification, yet posttranslational modification of histones is transitory, with reversible effects on gene expression. Histone posttranslational modifications influence access of transcription factors to DNA target sites to affect gene activity. Histones are regulated by several enzymes, including acetylases (HATs), deacetylases (HDACs), methyltransferases (HMTs), and demethylases (HDMTs). Generally, HATs activate, whereas HDACs suppress gene activity. Specifically, HMTs and HDMTs can either activate or inhibit gene expression, depending on the site and extent of the methylation pattern. There is growing interest in drugs that target enzymes involved in epigenetic control. Currently, a range of high-throughput screening (HTS) technologies are used to identify selective compounds against these enzymes. This review focuses on the rationale for drug development of these enzymes, as well the utility of HTS methods used in identifying and optimizing novel selective compounds that modulate epigenetic control of the human transcriptome.

A major new trend in drugs targeted at protein kinases is the discovery of allosteric modulators. These compounds differ from ATP-centric drugs in that they do not compete with ATP for binding to the catalytic domain, generally acting by inducing conformational changes to modulate activity. They could provide a number of advantages over more classical protein kinase drugs. For example, they are likely to be more selective, since they bind to unique regions of the kinase and may be useful in overcoming resistance that has developed to drugs that compete with ATP. They offer the ability of activating the kinases either by removing factors that inhibit kinase activity or by simply producing changes to the enzyme to foster catalytic activity. Furthermore, they provide more subtle modulation of kinase activity than simply blocking ATP access to inhibit activity. One hurdle to overcome in discovering these compounds is that allosteric modulators may need to inhibit protein-protein interactions; generally difficult to accomplish with small molecules. Despite the technical problems of identifying allosteric modulators, major gains have been made in identifying allosteric inhibitors and activators of the growth factor receptors as well as soluble tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases and some of these drugs are now in various stages of clinical trials. This review will focus on the discovery of novel allosteric modulators of protein kinases and drug discovery approaches that have been employed to identify such compounds.

GPCRs play a critical role in human physiology and are a prime target for drug discovery globally. Novel insights into the functions of GPCRs are providing unique approaches to modulate these proteins to generate unique drug candidates. Next generation ligands include those with novel pharmacologies such as allosteric regulators as well pepducins, that affect the interaction of GPCRs with G proteins, to either block selective receptor signaling pathways or mimic the actions of intracellular domains of receptors, thereby activating GPCRs to signal selectively to intracellular pathways. We will review these new concepts and then discuss how they may be exploited using modern discovery technologies to provide novel drug candidates for the future.

Protein kinases are important targets for drug discovery because they possess critical roles in many human diseases. Several protein kinase inhibitors have entered clinical development with others having already been approved for treating a host of diseases. However, many kinase inhibitors suffer from non-selectivity because they interact with the ATP binding region which has similar structures amongst the protein kinases and this non-selectivity sometimes can cause side effects. As a consequence, there is much interest in developing drugs that inhibit kinases through non-classical mechanisms with the hope of avoiding the side effects of previous kinase drugs.This review covers emerging information on kinase biology and discusses new approaches to design selective inhibitors that do not compete with ATP.The reader will gain a better understanding of the importance of the field of allosteric inhibitor drug discovery and how this has required the adoption of a new generation of high-throughput screening techniques.Discovery and development of allosteric modulators will result in a family of novel kinase therapies with greater selectivity and more varied ways to control activity of disease causing kinase targets.

For most membrane-bound molecular targets, including G protein linked receptors (GPCRs), the optimal approach in drug discovery involves the use of cell based high throughput screening (HTS) technologies to identify compounds that modulate target activity. Most GPCRs have been cloned and can therefore be routinely expressed in immortalized cell lines. These cells can be easily and rapidly grown in unlimited quantities making them ideal for use in current HTS technologies. A significant advantage of this approach is that immortalized recombinant cells provide a homogenous background for expression of the target which greatly facilitates consistency in screening, thus allowing for a better understanding of the mechanism of action of the interacting compound or drug. Nonetheless, it is now evident that numerous disparities exist between the physiological environment of screening systems using recombinant cells and natural tissues. This has lead to a problem in the validity of the pharmacological data obtained using immortalized cells in as much as such cells do not always reflect the desired clinical efficacy and safety of the compounds under examination. This brief review discusses these issues and describes how they influence the discovery of drugs using modern HTS.

AlphaScreen (Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay Screen) is versatile assay technology developed to measuring analytes using a homogenous protocol. This technology is an example of a bead-based proximity assay and was developed from a diagnostic assay technology known as LOCI (Luminescent Oxygen Channeling Assay). Here, singlet oxygen molecules, generated by high energy irradiation of Donor beads, travel over a constrained distance (approx. 200 nm) to Acceptor beads. This results in excitation of a cascading series of chemical reactions, ultimately causing generation of a chemiluminescent signal. In the past decade, a wide variety of applications has been reported, ranging from detection of analytes involved in cell signaling, including protein:protein, protein:peptide, protein:small molecule or peptide:peptide interactions. Numerous homogeneous HTS-optimized assays have been reported using the approach, including generation of second messengers (such as accumulation of cyclic AMP, cyclic GMP, inositol [1, 4, 5] trisphosphate or phosphorylated ERK) from liganded GPCRs or tyrosine kinase receptors, post-translational modification of proteins (such as proteolytic cleavage, phosphorylation, ubiquination and sumoylation) as well as protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Recently, the basic AlphaScreen technology was extended in that the chemistry of the Acceptor bead was modified such that emitted light is more intense and spectrally defined, thereby markedly reducing interference from biological fluid matrices (such as trace hemolysis in serum and plasma). In this format, referred to as AlphaLISA, it provides an alternative technology to classical ELISA assays and is suitable for high throughput automated fluid dispensing and detection systems. Collectively, AlphaScreen and AlphaLISA technologies provide a facile assay platform with which one can quantitate complex cellular processes using simple no-wash microtiter plate based assays. They provide the means by which large compound libraries can be screened in a high throughput fashion at a diverse range of therapeutically important targets, often not readily undertaken using other homogeneous assay technologies. This review assesses the current status of the technology in drug discovery, in general, and high throughput screening (HTS), in particular.

To investigate the role of Asp 114 in the cloned rat μ-opioid receptor for ligand binding, the charged amino acid was mutated to an asparagine to generate the mutant μ receptor D114N. The wild-type μ receptor and the D114N mutant were then stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, and the binding affinities of a series of opioids were investigated. The μ-selective agonists [D-Ala 2 ,MePhe 4 ,Gly-ol 5 ]enkephalin and morphine and the endogenous peptides Met-enkephalin and β-endorphin exhibited greatly reduced affinities for the D114N mutant compared with the wild-type μ receptor, as did the potent synthetic agonist etorphine. In contrast to the full agonists, the partial agonists buprenorphine and nalorphine and the antagonists diprenorphine and naloxone bound with similar affinities to the wild-type and D114N mutant μ receptors. The reduced affinities of the full agonists for the D114N mutant did not involve an uncoupling of the receptor from G proteins because methadone and etorphine stimulated the D114N μ receptors to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Although the Asp 114 to Asn 114 mutation reduced full-agonist binding, mutation of His 297 to Asn 297 in the μ receptor did not but, in contrast, did reduce binding affinity of the partial agonist buprenorphine and the antagonist diprenorphine. These results indicate that some partial agonists and antagonists may have different determinants for binding to the μ receptor than do the prototypical full agonists.

A key factor in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the β-secretase activity that is required for the production of beta-amyloid (Aβ) peptide from its amyloid precursor protein (APP) precursor. In this study, the majority of Aβ secretion from neuronal chromaffin cells was found to occur via the regulated secretory pathway, compared with the constitutive secretory pathway; therefore, β-secretase activity in the regulated secretory pathway was examined for the production and secretion of Aβ in chromaffin cells obtained from in vivo adrenal medullary tissue. The presence of Aβ(1–40) in APP-containing chromaffin vesicles, which represent regulated secretory vesicles, was demonstrated by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. These vesicles also contain Aβ(1–42), measured by RIA. Significantly, regulated secretion of Aβ(1–40) from chromaffin cells represented the majority of secreted Aβ (> 95% of total secreted Aβ), compared with low levels of constitutively secreted Aβ(1–40). These results indicate the importance of Aβ production and secretion in the regulated secretory pathway as a major source of extracellular Aβ. β-secretase activity in isolated chromaffin vesicles was detected with the substrate Z-Val-Lys-Met-MCA (methylcoumarinamide) that contains the β-secretase cleavage site. Optimum β-secretase activity in these vesicles required reducing conditions and acidic pH (pH 5–6), consistent with the in vivo intravesicular environment. Evidence for cysteine protease activity was shown by E64c inhibition of Z-Val-Lys-Met-MCA-cleaving activity, and E64c inhibition of Aβ(1–40) production in isolated chromaffin vesicles. Chromatography resolved the β-secretase activity into two distinct proteolytic pathways consisting of: (i) direct cleavage of the β-secretase site at Met-Asp by two cysteine proteolytic activities represented by peaks II-A and II-B, and (ii) an aminopeptidase-dependent pathway represented by peak I cysteine protease activity that cleaves between Lys-Met, followed by Met-aminopeptidase that would generate the β-secretase cleavage site. Treatment of chromaffin cells in primary culture with the cysteine protease inhibitor E64d reduced the production of the β-secretase product, a 12–14 kDa C-terminal APP fragment. In addition, BACE 1 and BACE 2 were detected in chromaffin vesicles; BACE 1 represented a small fraction of total β-secretase activity in these vesicles. These results illustrate that multiple cysteine proteases, in combination with BACE 1, contribute to β-secretase activity in the regulated secretory pathway. These results complement earlier findings for BACE 1 as β-secretase for Aβ production in the constitutive secretory pathway that provides basal secretion of Aβ into conditioned media. These findings suggest that drug inhibition of several proteases may be required for reducing Aβ levels as a potential therapeutic approach for AD.

β-Turns are a common secondary structure motif found in proteins that play a role in protein folding and stability and participate in molecular recognition interactions. Somatostatin, a peptide hormone possessing a variety of therapeutically-interesting biological acitivities, contains a β-turn in its bioactive conformation. The β-turn and biological activities of somatostatin have been succesfully mimicked in cyclic hexapeptide analogues. Two novel, structured, non-peptidic molecules were developed that are capable of holding the bioactive tetrapeptide sequence of somatostatin analogues in a β-turn conformation, as measured by somatostatin receptor (SSTR) binding. Template-constrained cyclic peptides in which the ends of the -Tyr- d -Trp-Lys-Val-tetrapeptide were linked by scaffolds based on either an N,N ′-dimethyl- N,N ′-diphenylurea or a substituted biphenyl system ( DJS631 and DJS811 , respectively), bound selectively to mouse SSTR2B and rat and human SSTR5 with affinities as high as 1 nM. DJS811 , at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day, was shown in a mouse Matrigel model to inhibit angiogenesis to a level of 79%. The development of structured turn scaffolds allows β-turn sequences to be contained in the context of a compact structure, with less peptidic nature and potentially greater bioavailability than cyclic hexapeptides. These systems can be used to study the determinants of β-turn formation, as well as to probe the importance of turn sequences occurring in molecular recognition interactions. The antiangiogenic activity of DJS811 suggests that it may have antitumor activity as well. In addition, because SSTR2 is overexpressed on many types of tumors, DJS631 and DJS811 may be useful in the development of agents for tumor imaging or the radiotherapy of cancer.

Opioid analgesics are used extensively in the management of pain. Although the clinically effective opioids bind with high affinity to the mu-opioid receptor, studies have suggested that the delta-opioid agonists might represent more ideal analgesic agents, with fewer side effects. A limitation to opiate effectiveness is the development of tolerance, an event that has been linked to opioid receptor desensitization. To gain a better understanding of delta-receptor agonist regulation, the cloned mouse delta receptor was stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, and the functional effects of agonist pretreatment were examined. With a 3-hr pretreatment protocol, the delta-selective agonists [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin, [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, and [D-Ser2,Leu5]enkephalin-Thr and the nonselective opioids levorphanol, etorphine, and ethylketocyclazocine were found to desensitize delta receptors. [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin, [D-Ser2,Leu5]enkephalin-Thr, [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, and etorphine treatments also caused a pronounced internalization of the epitope-tagged delta receptor, suggesting that the desensitization and internalization may be related. In contrast, levorphanol pretreatment did not internalize the receptor but still resulted in a 400-fold reduction in potency, suggesting that prolonged treatment with levorphanol only uncoupled the delta receptor from adenylyl cyclase. In contrast to the desensitization induced by peptide-selective delta agonists, pretreatment with the delta-selective nonpeptide agonist 7-spiroindanyloxymorphone and morphine sensitized the opioid inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. This differential regulation of the delta receptor may be due to variations in the ability of agonists to bind to the receptor. This hypothesis was supported by the finding that a point mutation that converted Asp128 to Asn128 (D128N) diminished the ability of delta-selective agonists to inhibit cAMP accumulation while increasing the potency of morphine to reduce cAMP accumulation. In particular, a lack of desensitization of the delta receptor by morphine may contribute to our understanding of the molecular basis of development of morphine-induced tolerance and dependence.

A growing body of evidence suggests that neuropeptide binding to G protein-linked receptors may result in internalization of receptor-ligand complexes, followed by intracellular mobilization and degradation of the ligand into its target cells. Because of discrepant results in the literature concerning the occurrence of such a mechanism for the tetradecapeptide somatostatin (SRIF), we have reinvestigated this question by comparing the binding and internalization of iodinated and fluorescent derivatives of the metabolically stable analog of SRIF, [D-Trp8]SRIF, in COS-7 cells transfected with complementary DNA encoding the sst1 or sst2A receptor subtype. A series of fluoresceinyl and Bodipy fluorescent derivatives of [D-Trp8]SRIF-14 was purified by HPLC, analyzed for purity by mass spectrometry, and tested for biological activity in a membrane binding assay. Of the six compounds tested, fluoresceinyl and Bodipy derivatives labeled in position alpha (fluo-SRIF) retained high affinity for SRIF receptors. COS-7 cells transfected with complementary DNA encoding either sst1 or sst2A receptors both displayed specific, high affinity binding of iodinated and fluo-SRIF. At 4 C, the labeling was confined to the cell surface in both cell types, as indicated by the fact that it was entirely removable by a hypertonic acid wash and assumed a pericellular distribution in the confocal microscope. At 37 C, the fate of specifically bound ligand varied markedly according to the type of receptor transfected. In cells encoding the sst1 receptor, approximately 20% of specifically bound ligand was recovered in the acid-resistant (i.e. intracellular) fraction. This fraction remained clustered at the periphery of the cell, suggesting that it was being sequestered either within or immediately beneath the plasma membrane. By contrast, in cells transfected with sst2A receptors, up to 75% of specifically bound ligand was recovered inside the cells, where it clustered into small endosome-like particles. These particles increased in size and moved toward the nucleus with time, suggestive of receptor-ligand complexes proceeding down the endocytic pathway. These results demonstrate that neuropeptides may be processed differently depending on the subtype of receptor expressed in their target cells and suggest that these different processing patterns may reflect different modes of sensitization/desensitization and recycling of the receptors, and thereby of transmembrane signaling.

The somatostatin (SRIF) receptors (SSTRs) 1 and 2 bind SRIF and SRIF 28 with high affinity, although a number of synthetic hexapeptide and octapeptide analogs of SRIF bind selectively to SSTR2. Extracellular loop three and its adjoining trans-membrane-spanning regions contain elements essential for the binding of such analogs to murine SSTR2. In particular, a stretch of amino acids from residues 294-297 (FDFV) in murine SSTR2 in trans-membrane domain seven can determine affinity for the SSTR2-selective analogs. Within this region, Phe294 has previously been predicted to be essential for the binding of octapeptides (Kaupmann, K., Bruns, C., Raulf, F., Weber, H., Mattes, H., and Lubbert, H. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 727-735) based on the observation that SSTR1 can bind the octapeptide SMS-201-995 with reasonable affinity after a Ser-to-Phe conversion in the analogous region of this receptor (SSTR1S305F). We find that SSTR1S305F has low affinity for a number of SSTR2-selective hexapeptides, suggesting that these analogs have different binding requirements than SMS-201-995. A correlation is seen between the ability of SSTR1S305F to bind hexapeptide analogs and the presence of a phenylalanine, but not tyrosine, at position two in these small cyclic molecules. Thus, a single hydroxyl group in hexapeptides can play a critical role in determining receptor binding to these receptor mutants. We also find that the second extracellular loop of SSTR1 is important for the selectivity of certain SRIF agonists for binding to SSTR1. Taken together, our data indicate that there are multiple elements in the somatostatin receptors that can determine the binding affinity and selectivity of peptide analogs.

The somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 mediate distinct endocrine and exocrine functions of somatostatin and may also be involved in mediating the neuromodulatory actions of somatostatin in the brain. To investigate whether these receptors couple to voltage-sensitive Ca 2+ channels, SSTR2 and SSTR5 selective agonists were tested for their effects on AtT-20 cells using whole cell patch clamp techniques. The SSTR2 selective agonist MK 678 inhibited Ca 2+ currents in AtT-20 cells. The effects of MK 678 were reversible and blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment, suggesting that SSTR2 couples to the L-type Ca 2+ channels via G proteins. Other SSTR2-selective agonists, including BIM 23027 and NC8-12, were able to inhibit the Ca 2+ current in these cells. The SSTR5 selective agonist BIM 23052 also inhibited the Ca 2+ currents in these cells and this effect was reversible and blocked by pertussis toxin treatment. The ability of SSTR5 to mediate inhibition of the Ca 2+ current was greatly attenuated by pretreatment with the SSTR5-selective agonist BIM 23052, whereas SSTR2-mediated inhibition of the Ca 2+ current was not altered by pretreatment with the SSTR2-selective agonist MK 678. Thus, the SSTR2 and SSTR5 couplings to the Ca 2+ current are differentially regulated. The peptide L362,855, which we previously have shown to have high affinity for the cloned SSTR5, had minimal effects on Ca 2+ currents in AtT-20 cells at concentrations up to 100 nM and did not alter the ability of MK 678 to inhibit Ca 2+ currents. However, it completely antagonized the effects of the SSTR5-selective agonist BIM 23052 on the Ca 2+ currents. L362,855 is an antagonist/ partial agonist at SSTR5 since it can reduce Ca 2+ currents in these cells at concentrations above 100 nM. L362,855 is also an antagonist/partial agonist at the cloned rat SSTR5 expressed in CHO cells since it is able to block the inhibition of CAMP accumulation induced by somatostatin at concentrations below 100 nM but at higher concentrations can inhibit CAMP formation itself. Structural analysis of L362,855 reveals that only a single hydroxyl group at residue seven in the peptide is needed to convert the compound from an antagonist/partial agonist to a full agonist at SSTR5. These studies reveal that two different somatostatin receptor subtypes, SSTR2 and SSTR5, can mediate the inhibition of an L-type Ca 2+ channel in AtT-20 cells by somatostatin. The receptor subtype responses can be distinguished by selective agonists and antagonists and are regulated differently by agonist pretreatment. The inhibition of Call influx into endocrine cells and neurons may be a major cellular mechanism by which somatostatin modulates hormone and neurotransmitter release. Our results reveal that at least two receptor subtypes can mediate this cellular response.

Somatostatin (SRIF) induces its multiple biological actions by interacting with a family of receptors, referred to as SSTR1-SSTR5. These receptors are capable of associating with particular guanine nucleotide binding proteins to couple the receptors to distinct cellular effector systems. Therefore, G proteins have an important role in directing SRIF signalling and may provide the molecular basis for the diverse cellular actions of SRIF.

We have recently reported the cloning of a mouse kappa opioid receptor cDNA. 25 Following transfection of the kappa receptor cDNA into COS-1 cells, a receptor is expressed with the pharmacological specificity of a kappa 1 opioid receptor. To further analyse its functional properties, we have stably expressed the kappa opioid receptor in undifferentiated PC-12 cells, a pheochromocytoma clonal cell line, which do not endogenously express this receptor. We have previously shown that kappa opioid agonists selectively bind to these PC-12 membranes with high affinity. 17 Here we show that kappa selective agonists are able to inhibit accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate in a stereoselective manner. Further, the kappa agonist U-50,488 is able to inhibit an N-type calcium current in a pertussis toxin sensitive manner; this inhibition is blocked by the kappa-selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine. Inhibition of the calcium current via the kappa receptor is stereoselective as the agonist levorphanol is able to mediate inhibition whereas in the same cells dextrorphan is ineffective. This is the first demonstration that the cloned kappa opioid receptor functionally couples to a calcium current, as has been reported for kappa receptors expressed endogenously in the nervous system. Kappa opioid receptors are thought to be important in pain pathways, learning and memory deficits, and seizure activity. A major physiological action of the dynorphins, the endogenous ligands of the kappa receptor, is thought to be inhibition of neurotransmitter release at presynaptic terminals. N-type calcium channels may be important in neurotransmitter release. For example it has been demonstrated at the mossy fiber synapse in the hippocampus that inhibition of N-type calcium currents blocks excitatory postsynaptic potentials measured in the pyrimidal cells. 2 We show here that the cloned kappa receptor acts to inhibit N-type calcium channels in clonal PC-12 cells, which may be an important mechanism by which the dynorphins regulate synaptic events.

The mu (mu) opioid receptors, which mediate the effects of morphine, are widely distributed in brain. We have examined the distribution of mRNA encoding a mu opioid receptor in rat brain with in situ hybridization histochemistry at the single-cell level to obtain information about the cell types synthesizing this receptor. Only neurons, not glia, were labeled in discrete brain regions. High levels of labeling were detected in the thalamus, striosomes of the caudate-putamen, globus pallidus, and brain regions involved in nociception, arousal, respiratory control, and, possibly, addiction. The general distribution of the receptor mRNA paralleled that of mu opioid binding sites with some notable exceptions. These include the cerebral cortex, which contains binding sites, but very few labeled neurons. No labeling was observed in the cerebellum, a region devoid of mu binding sites. Three main findings emerged from these experiments: 1) the mRNA was present in regions mediating both the therapeutic (analgesia) and the unwanted (respiratory depression, addiction) effects of morphine, 2) the mRNA was very densely expressed by neurons known to receive dense enkephalin-containing inputs, and 3) the dissociation between the presence of binding sites and absence of mRNA in some brain regions supports a presynaptic localization of mu opioid receptors in these areas. Alternatively, other subtypes of mu opioid receptors may be encoded by a different mRNA. These results provide new insights into the receptor types and neuronal circuits involved in the effects of endogenous opioids and morphine.

Opioids and cannabinoids are two major classes of drugs with important clinical uses as well as significant side effects. Recently, the three major subtypes of opioid receptors, delta, kappa and mu, have been cloned. Both the endogenous cannabinoids and their receptors have also recently been cloned. These advances are facilitating attempts to understand the structural features of these receptors that are involved in their functioning, which should lead to the development of new and improved clinically useful opioids and cannabinoid-like drugs.

The somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) was detected in a wide range of human and rat tumors using in vitro receptor binding ([125I]MK-678), receptor gene expression analysis, and immunoblotting techniques. The highest receptor concentrations were observed in the rat AR42J pancreatic and human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines, NCI-H69 and NCI-H345, with much lower levels detected in breast, prostate, melanoma, and hepatic tumors. Several human pancreas tumors were devoid of SSTR2. For all tumors showing detectable [125I]MK-678 binding, SSTR2 receptor mRNA was expressed. Furthermore, a mRNA transcript corresponding to a truncated isoform of SSTR2 was detected at low levels in the human SCLC NCI-H69 cell line, and likely represents a human homologue of rodent SSTR2B. Immunoblotting analysis using the SSTR2-specific antibody, 2e3, detected multiple immunoreactive protein species, including a predominant 150-kDa molecule, which could be blocked by the SSTR2-derived 2e3 peptide. Somatostatin (SRIF) peptides with high SSTR2 affinity and antiproliferative properties were potent inhibitors of [125I]MK-678 binding to several tumor types, suggesting that they may exert antitumor effects via the SSTR2 receptor.

Opium and its derivatives are potent analgesics that also have many other pharmacological effects in the nervous system. These agents and the endogenous opioid peptides exert their effects by interacting with high-affinity receptors. Complementary DNAs encoding the δ, k and μ opioid receptors have been isolated and characterized. These receptors, which are members of the superfamily of seven-transmembrane spanning receptors, share a high degree of amino acid sequence similarity with approximately 50% of the residues being identical. The cloned opioid receptors mediate agonist inhibition of cyclic AMP formation and have pharmacological properties similar to the endogenous proteins. The cloning of these receptors will facilitate the development of new clinically useful compounds as well as studies of the molecular basis of tolerance and drug addiction.

The enkephalins, dynorphins, and endorphins are endogenous opioids which function as neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and hormones and are involved in the perception of pain, modulation of behavior, and regulation of autonomic and neuroendocrine function. Pharmacological studies have defined three classes of opioid receptors, designated as delta, kappa, and mu. To investigate mechanisms by which agonists and antagonists interact with the delta opioid receptor, we have substituted aspartic acid 95 in the transmembrane segment 2 of the cloned mouse delta opioid receptor with an asparagine (D95N). The D95N mutant receptor had reduced affinity for delta receptor-selective agonists such as enkephalin, [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Ser2,Leu5]enkephalin-Thr6 such that it did not bind these peptides even at micromolar concentrations. The binding of delta-selective non-peptide agonists was also reduced. In contrast, the delta receptor-selective antagonists, such as naltrindole, the benzofuran analog of naltrindole, and 7-benyllidenenaltrexone, bound equally well to the wild-type and mutant receptor. Similarly, non-selective opioid agonists such as bremazocine and buprenorphine, which interact with delta, kappa, and mu opioid receptors, showed no difference in binding to the wild-type and mutant delta receptor. The D95N mutant remained coupled to G proteins, and the receptor was functionally active since it mediated agonist inhibition of cAMP accumulation. These results indicate that selective agonists and antagonists bind differently to the delta receptor and show that Asp-95 contributes to high affinity delta-selective agonist binding. The identification of a key residue involved in selective agonist binding to the delta opioid receptor will facilitate the development of novel therapeutic reagents that can be used for the treatment of chronic pain and other conditions.

The cyclic hexapeptide c[-Pro 6 -Phe 7 -D-Trp 8 -Lys 9 -Thr 10 -Phe 11 -] displays high biological activities in inhibiting the release of many bioactive molecules, including growth hormone, insulin, and glucagon. The superscript numbers refer to the location of the residues in native somatostatin. Conformational studies of this cyclic hexapeptide indicated considerable conformational flexibility in various regions of backbone and side chains. The flexibility prevents the elucidation of the «bioactive conformation» of this molecule when bound to a receptor. To reduce the conformational flexibility, we have synthesized one main chain methylated analog containing α-MeVal at position 10, c[Pro 6 -Phe 7 -D-Trp 8 -Lys 9 -(S)-α-MeVal 10 -Phe 11 -], and two side chain methylated analogs containing β-MeTrp and β-MePhe at positions 8 and 11, respectively, c[Pro 6 -Phe 7 -(2R,3S)-β-MeTrp 8 -Lys 9 -Val 10 -(2S,3S)-β-MePhe 11 -] and c[Pro 6 -Phe 7 -(2S,3R)-β-MeTrp 8 -Lys 9 -Val 10 -(2S,3S)-β-MePhe 11 -]. The effect of main chain and side chain methylations has been studied using 500-MHz two-dimensional 1 H-NMR and computer simulations. These main chain and side chain methylated analogs display constrained conformational preferences at the modified backbone and side chains. One of the side chain methylated analogs shows high potency in receptor binding. Conformational studies of these analogs provide valuable information about the main chain and side chain conformation required for receptor interaction. This study clearly demonstrated a novel approach using main chain and side chain methylations in the elucidation of the bioactive conformation of stomatostatin analogs. This approach may have important implications in the study of other peptide hormones and neurotransmitters

The interaction of the SRIF receptor subtype SSTR2 with pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins was investigated using an immunoprecipitation approach employing peptide-directed antisera against Gi alpha and G(o) alpha. Antisera directed against either the COOH terminus of Gi alpha or Go alpha uncoupled SSTR2-G protein complexes from CHO cells stably expressing the cloned receptor indicating that both G proteins form complexes with SSTR2. Chinese hamster ovary cells primarily express Gi alpha 3 and G(o) alpha 2 immunoreactivity, with much lower levels of the other pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. Antiserum against Gi alpha 3 uncoupled SSTR2/G protein complexes to a similar extent as Gi alpha common antiserum while antisera against Gi alpha 1 and Gi alpha 2 did not. These findings indicate that SSTR2 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells predominantly associates with Gi alpha 3 and G(o) alpha 2. In HEK 293 cells which endogenously express low densities of SSTR2 and similar levels of Gi alpha 1 and Gi alpha 3 immunoreactivity but no G(o) alpha, only antiserum directed against Gi alpha 3 immunoprecipitated SSTR2-G protein complexes, indicating that in these cells SSTR2 primarily associates with Gi alpha 3. SRIF can not inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation in wild-type HEK 293 cells nor in HEK 293 cells transfected with SSTR2. In contrast, SRIF can inhibit cAMP formation in HEK 293 cells expressing the cloned SRIF receptor SSTR3, which requires the presence of Gi alpha 1 to functionally couple to adenylyl cyclase. The lack of efficient association of SSTR2 with Gi alpha 1 may be the cause of its inability to mediate inhibition of cAMP formation. Differences in the G protein-coupling domains of the cloned SRIF receptors may be responsible for their differences in G protein association and ability to effect various signaling pathways.

In testing and refining our model of the receptor-bound conformation of the potent small-ring somatostatin analog cyclo-(Pro6-Phe7-D-Trp8-Lys9-Thr10-Phe11), we have investigated structures constrained within bicyclic systems. Specifically, we have incorporated the 8-membered -C ys-Cy s- unit in place of the -Phe11-Pro6-segment, thus achieving two aims: 1) constraint of the 11- > 6 amide bond to the cis geometry established for the cyclic hexapeptide; 2) positioning of the disulfide in place of the position-11 phenyl group, to act as surrogate for phenyl in receptor binding. Synthetic methodology which provides ready access to this class of compounds is presented, along with results of NMR spectral studies of the bicyclic systems. Biological assays show retention of high potency, in confirmation of our view of cyclo-cystine as a good mimetic for cis amide. Other reported mimetics for the cis amide bond are reviewed from the perspectives of comparative ease of accessibility and approximation of various amide bond parameters.

Many drug discovery screening programs employ immortalized cells, recombinantly engineered to express a defined molecular target. Several technologies are now emerging that render it feasible to employ more physiologically, and clinically relevant, cell phenotypes. Consequently, numerous approaches use primary cells, which retain many functions seen in vivo, as well as endogenously expressing the target of interest. Furthermore, stem cells, of either embryonic or adult origin, as well as those derived from differentiated cells, are now finding a place in drug discovery. Collectively, these cells are expanding the utility of authentic human cells, either as screening tools or as therapeutics, as well as providing cells derived directly from patients. Nonetheless, the growing use of phenotypically relevant cells (including primary cells or stem cells) is not without technical difficulties, particularly when their envisioned use lies in high-throughput screening (HTS) protocols. In particular, the limited availability of homogeneous primary or stem cell populations for HTS mandates that novel technologies be developed to accelerate their adoption. These technologies include detection of responses with very few cells as well as protocols to generate cell lines in abundant, homogeneous populations. In parallel, the growing use of changes in cell phenotype as the assay readout is driving greater use of high-throughput imaging techniques in screening. Taken together, the greater availability of novel primary and stem cell phenotypes as well as new detection technologies is heralding a new era of cellular screening. This convergence offers unique opportunities to identify drug candidates for disorders at which few therapeutics are presently available.

We have developed an integrated approach for investigating the «bioactive conformations» of the main chain and side chains for the somatostatin analog c[Pro 6 Phe 7 -D-Trp 8 -Lys 9 -Thr 10 -Phe 11 ]. A series of analogs have been synthesized incorporating α-methylated and β-methylated residues at positions 7, 8, and 11. These analogs display dramatic differences in in vitro binding affinities for somatostatin receptors

The gene encoding a novel mouse somatostatin receptor termed mSSTR3 was isolated and characterized. The sequence of mSSTR3 shows 46 and 47% identity with mSSTR1 and mSSTR2, respectively. mSSTR3 binds somatostatin-14 and somatostatin-28 with high affinity, but shows very low affinity for the somatostatin analogs MK-678 and SMS-201-995. In addition, mSSTR3 is coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins and mediates somatostatin inhibition of forskolin-stimulated and dopamine D1 receptor-stimulated cAMP formation, indicating that it is coupled to adenylylcyclase. The pharmacological properties of mSSTR3 and its ability to couple with adenylylcyclase distinguish SSTR3 from the other cloned somatostatin receptors and indicates that it mediates biological functions different from SSTR1 or SSTR2. In situ hybridization indicates that SSTR3 mRNA is widely distributed in the mouse brain, and its expression in the nucleus of the lateral olfactory tract and in the piriform cortex, the primary olfactory cortex in the rodent brain, suggests that SSTR3 may participate in the processing and modulation of primary sensory information.

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a neurotransmitter that produces its multiple effects in the CNS through interactions with membrane-bound receptors. Subtypes of SRIF receptors are found in the CNS that are distinguished by their sensitivities to the cyclic hexapeptide MK-678, such that SRIF1 receptors are sensitive to MK-678 and SRIF2 receptors are insensitive to MK-678. In the present study, we further examined the selectivities of a series of structurally diverse SRIF analogues for SRIF receptor subtypes. SRIF receptors were labeled by 125I-Tyr11-SRIF, which has indistinguishable affinities for SRIF receptor subtypes. The inhibition by MK-678 was incomplete, indicating this peptide is highly selective for a subtype of SRIF receptor that we have termed the SRIF1 receptor. The binding of 125I-MK-678 to SRIF1 receptors was monophasically inhibited by SRIF, the octapeptides (such as SMS-201-995), and the hexapeptides (such as MK-678), consistent with the highly selective labeling of a subtype of SRIF receptor. In contrast, the smaller CGP-23996-like analogues did not inhibit 125I-MK-678 binding to SRIF1 receptors. The binding of 125I-CGP-23996 to SRIF receptors was inhibited by SRIF and the octapeptides with Hill coefficients of less than 1, indicating that 125I-CGP-23996 labels multiple SRIF receptor subtypes. The hexapeptides and CGP-23996-like compounds produced only partial inhibitions of 125I-CGP-23996 binding, which were additive, indicating selective interactions of these compounds with the different receptor subpopulations labeled by 125I-CGP-23996. 125I-Tyr11-SRIF binding and 125I-CGP-23996 binding to SRIF receptors were likewise only partially affected by 100 microM guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP gamma S), a concentration that completely abolishes specific 125I-MK-678 binding to SRIF1 receptors. The component of 125I-CGP-23996 labeling that was sensitive to GTP gamma S was also MK-678 sensitive. Thus, two subpopulations of SRIF receptors exist in the CNS. The SRIF1 receptor is sensitive to cyclic hexapeptides such as MK-678 and to GTP gamma S but insensitive to smaller CGP-23996-like compounds. The SRIF2 receptor is sensitive to the CGP-23996-like compounds and can be selectively labeled by 125I-CGP-23996 in the presence of high concentrations of the hexapeptides or GTP gamma S because, unlike the SRIF1 receptor, the SRIF2 receptor is insensitive to these agents. The SRIF receptor subtype-selective peptide analogues will be useful in the future characterization of the functions mediated by SRIF receptor subtypes in the CNS.

The nature of the interaction of cloned alpha 2a-adrenergic receptors from LLC-PK1-O clone cells with G proteins was investigated using an immunoprecipitation approach. Following solubilization of the alpha 2a receptors, antiserum 8730, which is directed against the C-terminal region of Gi alpha, immunoprecipitated alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes. The immunoprecipitation was specific since it could be blocked by the peptide to which antiserum 8730 was generated. Antisera 3646 (anti-Gi alpha 1), 1521 (anti-Gi alpha 2), and 1518 (anti-Gi alpha 3) immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes, indicating that all three Gi alpha subtypes couple with the alpha 2a receptor. Antiserum 9072, which is directed against the C-terminal region of G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complexes indicating that these receptors are also coupled to G(o)alpha. Antiserum 8132, which is directed against G beta 36, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptors while the G beta 35 antiserum 8129, did not, indicating that alpha 2a receptors selectively associate with G beta 36. The binding of the partial agonist p-aminoclonidine to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor alters the association of the receptor with G proteins. Following p-aminoclonidine binding to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor, the ability of the C-terminal directed G alpha antisera 8730 and 9072 to coimmunoprecipitate the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex was greatly reduced. The effect of p-aminoclonidine was concentration dependent, mimicked by the full agonist UK 14304 and blocked by the alpha 2 receptor antagonist yohimbine. In contrast, antisera directed against internal regions of Gi alpha and G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated the agonist-bound and agonist-free alpha 2a receptor equally well. These findings indicate that following the binding of agonists to the alpha 2a receptor, Gi alpha and G(o)alpha remain physically associated with the receptor but either the conformation of G alpha linked to the receptor or the conformation of the receptor itself is modified such that the epitope for the C-terminal directed anti-Gi alpha and anti-G(o)alpha antisera are not accessible. These agonist-induced conformational changes in the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex may be important for the activation of the G protein and the stimulation of the alpha 2a receptor signal transduction pathway.

The tetradecapeptide somatostatin (SRIF) exerts diverse biological actions in the endocrine and nervous systems (1, 2). It is the major physiological inhibitor of growth hormone secretion from the anterior pituitary and insulin and glucagon release from the pancreatic islets and also regulates gastric acid secretion from the gut (3–6). SRIF is also expressed in extrahypothalamic locations in the brain, where it has a role in controlling cognitive functions (7, 8). Furthermore, in the striatum, where it has been implicated in modulating locomotor activity (9, 10), SRIF is a major stimulant of dopamine release from nigrostriatal neurons and may interact with dopamine in modulating basal ganglia functions (11).

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of proteins that represent targets for approximately 40% of all approved drugs. They possess unique structural motifs that allow them to interact with a diverse series of extracellular ligands, as well as intracellular signaling proteins, such as G proteins, RAMPs, arrestins, and indeed other receptors. Extensive efforts are under way to discover new generations of drugs against GPCRs with unique targeted therapeutic uses, including "designer" drugs such as allosteric regulators, inverse agonists, and drugs targeting hetero-oligomeric complexes. This has been facilitated by the development of new screening technologies to identify novel drugs against both known and orphan GPCRs.

Protein kinases are important targets in drug discovery programs aimed at treating many devastating diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, diabetes, and neurological disorders. Most "classical" drug discovery efforts employ rational drug design methods based upon structural information to identify compounds targeting the enzyme catalytic domain. Novel information on kinase biology is opening up other approaches in the design of selective inhibitors that may provide more subtle modulation of these drug discovery targets. The identification of such modulators requires adoption of a new generation of high-throughput screening techniques. These approaches will allow measurement of conformational changes in kinases, as well as protein-protein interactions via assessment of functional responses such as cellular translocation. Therefore a range of novel techniques, together with the understanding that numerous "orphan" kinases will provide targets for therapeutics, suggests that a new era of kinase therapies is rapidly emerging.

SRIF receptors are membrane-bound glycoproteins. To structurally identify the carbohydrate components of SRIF receptors, solubilized rat brain SRIF receptors were subjected to lectin affinity chromatography. Solubilized SRIF receptors specifically bound to wheat germ agglutinin-lectin affinity columns but not to succinylated wheat germ agglutinin. This finding, as well as the ability of the solubilized receptor to interact with a Sambucus nigra L. lectin affinity column suggested that sialic acid residues are associated with SRIF receptors. The inability of the receptor to bind to concanavalin A, Dolichus biflorus agglutinin, Ulex europeaus I, and Jacalin lectin affinity columns suggests that high mannose, N-acetylgalactosamine, fucose, and O-linked carbohydrates are not associated with receptor. To investigate the functional role of the carbohydrate groups in brain SRIF receptors, specific sugars were selectively cleaved from SRIF receptors and the subsequent effect on the specific high affinity binding of the agonist [125I]MK 678 to SRIF receptors was determined. Treatment of the receptor with endoglycosidase D did not affect the specific binding of [125I] MK 678 to the solubilized SRIF receptors, consistent with the finding from lectin affinity chromatography that high mannose-type carbohydrate structures were not associated with SRIF receptors. Treatment of solubilized SRIF receptors with peptide-N-glycosidase F and endoglycosidases H and F reduced [125I]MK 678 binding to SRIF receptors indicating that either hybrid, or a combination of hybrid and complex N-linked carbohydrate structures, have a role in maintaining the receptor in a high affinity state for agonists. Treatment of solubilized SRIF receptors with neuraminidase from Vibrio cholera abolished high affinity agonist binding to the receptors, whereas treatment of the receptor with neuraminidase from Newcastle disease virus did not affect [125I]MK 678 binding to the receptor. These findings suggest that sialic acid residues in an alpha 2,6-configuration have a role in maintaining the SRIF receptor in a high affinity conformation for agonists. This is further indicated by studies on SRIF receptors in the pituitary tumor cell line, AtT-20. Treatment of AtT-20 cells in culture with neuraminidase (V. cholera) greatly reduces high affinity [125I] MK 678 binding sites, but did not alter the maximal ability of SRIF to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact AtT-20 cells. This finding suggests that the desialylated SRIF receptor is functionally active and remains coupled to GTP-binding proteins, but exhibits a reduced affinity for agonists. Treatment of AtT-20 cell membranes with neuraminidase from V. cholera was also able to greatly reduce the affinity of SRIF receptors for [125I]MK 678.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Somatostatin (SRIF) induces its biological effects by interacting with membrane-bound receptors that are linked to cellular effector systems via G proteins. We have studied SRIF receptor-G protein associations by solubilizing the SRIF receptor from rat brain and AtT-20 cells and immunoprecipitating the receptor-G protein complex with peptide-directed antisera against the different subunits of the G protein heterotrimer. Antiserum 8730, which selectively interacts with all Gi alpha subtypes, maximally and specifically immunoprecipitated SRIF receptor-Gi alpha complexes. To identify the subtypes of Gi alpha that are coupled to SRIF receptors, the subtype-selective antisera 3646, 1521, and 1518, which specifically interact with Gi alpha 1, Gi alpha 2, and Gi alpha 3, respectively, were used to immunoprecipitate SRIF receptor-Gi alpha complexes. Antiserum 3646 immunoprecipitated SRIF receptor-Gi alpha 1 complexes from both brain and AtT-20 cells. Antiserum 1521 immunoprecipitated Gi alpha 2 from both brain and AtT-20 cells but did not immunoprecipitate SRIF receptors from these tissues. Antiserum 1518 immunoprecipitated AtT-20 cell SRIF receptors but uncoupled brain SRIF receptor-G protein complexes. This result was confirmed with another peptide-selective antiserum, SQ, directed against Gi alpha 3. The findings from these studies indicate that Gi alpha 1 and Gi alpha 3 are coupled to SRIF receptors, whereas Gi alpha 2 is not. Even though brain and AtT-20 cell SRIF receptors were both coupled to Gi alpha, the receptors from these tissues differed in their coupling to Go alpha. Antiserum 2353, which is directed against Go alpha, immunoprecipitated SRIF receptors from AtT-20 cells, but did not immunoprecipitate or uncouple SRIF receptor-G protein complexes from rat brain. To determine the beta subunits associated with the SRIF receptor, antisera directed against G beta 36 and G beta 35 were used to immunoprecipitate SRIF receptor-G protein complexes from brain. Peptide-directed antiserum against G beta 36 selectively immunoprecipitated solubilized brain SRIF receptors. However, antiserum directed against the G beta 35 subunit did not immunoprecipitate brain SRIF receptors, suggesting that brain SRIF receptors may preferentially associate with G beta 36. In addition to coimmunoprecipitating with Gi alpha and G beta, brain SRIF receptors coimmunoprecipitated the G protein gamma subunits, G gamma 2 and G gamma 3. These results provide the first evidence that SRIF receptors are coupled to different subunits of G proteins and suggest that selectivity exists in the association of different G protein subunits with the SRIF receptor.

The syntheses of new cyclic hexapeptides are described. These peptides potently displace [ 125 I] CGP-23996 (des-Ala 1 , Gly 2 -desamino-Cys 3 [Tyr 11 ]-dicarba 3,14 SRIF) from SRIF receptors on AtT-20 cells. Two of these compounds are of potential value for the isolation of SRIF receptors by affinity chromatography. A key feature in the design was the use of orthogonal protection to provide selective covalent bonding to the solid support.

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family is a major target for drug discovery, and most, if not all, GPCRs can couple to Ca2+ signaling. Consequently, there are a number of cellbased, primary, high-throughput screening (HTS) assays used for drug discovery that assess changes in intracellular Ca2+ as a functional readout of GPCR activation. Historically, changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels have been readily detected using fluorescent dyes that emit light in proportion to changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. An alternative approach to indirectly measure changes in Ca2+ concentrations involves the use of recombinantly expressed biosensor photoproteins, of which aequorin is a prototypic example. These biosensors have the advantage that they provide an intense luminescent signal in response to elevations in intracellular Ca2+. This exquisite sensitivity, the high signal-to-noise ratios, and the ability to target expression to discrete subcellular sites (in order to detect Ca2+ microdomains) have made photoproteins a principal choice in a wide range of GPCR drug discovery programs. Photoproteins are also finding increasing use in detecting activation of other molecular target classes such as ligand-gated ion channels and transporters. This review focuses upon the use of calcium photoproteins principally for use in GPCR drug discovery and HTS.

Cellular technologies are widely used in drug discovery to treat human diseases. Most studies involve the expression of recombinant targets in immortalized cells and measure drug interactions using simple, quantifiable responses. Such cells are also amenable to high throughput screening (HTS) methods. However, the cell phenotype employed in HTS is often determined by the assay technology available, rather than the physiological relevance of the cell background. They are, therefore, suboptimal surrogates for cells that accurately reflect human diseases. Consequently, there is growing interest in adopting primary and embryonic stem cells in drug discovery. Primary cells are already used in secondary screening assays in conjunction with confocal imaging techniques, as well as in target validation studies employing, for example, gene silencing approaches. Stem cells can be grown in unlimited quantities and can be derived from transgenic animals engineered to express disease causing proteins better coupling the molecular target with function in vivo. Human stem cells also offer unique opportunities for drug discovery in that they can be directed to specific phenotypes thus providing a framework to identify tissueselective agents. Organizing stem cells into networks resembling those in native tissues, potentially returns drug discovery back to the highly successful pharmacological methods of the past, in which organ and tissue based systems were used, but with the advantage that they can be utilized using modern HTS technologies. This emerging area will lead to discovery of compounds whose effect in vivo is more predictable thereby increasing the efficiency of drugs that ameliorate human disease.

The characteristics of somatostatin (SRIF) receptors in rat pancreatic beta-cells were investigated using rat islets and the beta-cell line HIT-T15 (HIT). The biochemical properties of the SRIF receptors were examined with 125I-labeled des-Ala-1,Gly-2-desamino-Cys-3-[Tyr-11]- dicarba3,14-somatostatin (CGP 23996). 125I-CGP 23996 bound to SRIF receptors in HIT cells with high affinity and in a saturable manner. The binding of 125I-CGP 23996 to SRIF receptors was blocked by SRIF analogues with a rank order of potency of somatostatin 28 (SRIF-28) greater than D-Trp-8-somatostatin greater than somatostatin 14 (SRIF-14). To investigate the physical properties of the HIT cell SRIF receptor, the receptor was covalently labeled with 125I-CGP 23996 using photo-cross-linking techniques. 125I-CGP 23996 specifically labeled a protein of 55 kDa in HIT cell membranes. The size of the SRIF receptor in HIT cells is similar to the size of the SRIF receptor labeled with 125I-CGP 23996 in membranes of freshly isolated islets, suggesting that the physical properties of SRIF receptors in HIT cells and rat islet cells are similar. The binding studies suggest that beta-cells predominantly express a SRIF-28-preferring receptor. In freshly isolated islets, glucose- and arginine-stimulated insulin release was effectively blocked by SRIF-28 but not by SRIF-14. SRIF-14 did inhibit arginine-stimulated glucagon secretion from freshly isolated islets. The dissociation of the inhibitory effects of SRIF-28 and SRIF-14 on insulin and glucagon release from freshly isolated islets suggests that the two peptides act through different receptors in islets to regulate hormone secretion.

The diverse physiological effects of somatostatin are mediated by a family of cell surface receptors that bind somatostatin selectively and with high affinity. The somatostatin receptors are members of the seven transmembrane segment receptor superfamily and molecular cloning studies have identified five types, designated sstr1-5. The human somatostatin receptors vary in size from 364 (sstr5) to 418 (sstr3) amino acids with 46-61% amino acid identity between receptors, and 105 amino acids are invariant. The sequences of the seven putative alpha-helical membrane-spanning domains are more highly conserved than those of the extracellular N- and intracellular C-terminal domains. Two forms of sstr2 have been identified in the mouse, sstr2A and sstr2B, which differ in size and sequence of the intracellular C-terminal domain. These two forms of sstr2 are products of a common gene and are generated by alternative splicing with sstr2A and sstr2B being the products of the unspliced and spliced forms, respectively, of sstr2 mRNA. Thus, functional diversity within the somatostatin receptor family may result from the expression of multiple types as well as from alternative splicing. The five somatostatin receptors have distinct patterns of expression in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. They have also been expressed in vitro and shown to have different pharmacological properties. Somatostatin analogues selective for sstr2, sstr3 and sstr5 have been identified which will facilitate in vivo studies of the functions of these somatostatin receptors. Such studies to date suggest that sstr2 mediates inhibition of growth hormone secretion and sstr5 mediates inhibition of insulin secretion. The molecular cloning and functional characterization of the somatostatin receptor family is a first step in elucidating the diverse effects of somatostatin on cellular functions.

Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise one of the largest families of proteins in the human genome and are a target for 40% of all approved drugs. GPCRs have unique structural motifs that allow them to interact with a wide and diverse series of extracellular ligands, as well as intracellular proteins, G proteins, receptor activity-modifying proteins, arrestins, and indeed other receptors. This distinctive structure has led to numerous efforts to discover drugs against GPCRs with targeted therapeutic uses. Such "designer" drugs currently include allosteric regulators, inverse agonists, and drugs targeting hetero-oligomeric complexes. Moreover, the large family of orphan GPCRs provides a rich and novel field of targets to discover drugs with unique therapeutic properties. The numerous technologies to discover GPCR drugs have also greatly advanced over the years, facilitating compound screening against known and orphan GPCRs, as well as in the identification of unique designer GPCR drugs. Indeed, high throughput screening (HTS) technologies employing functional cell-based approaches are now widely used. These include measurement of second messenger accumulation such as cyclic AMP, calcium ions, and inositol phosphates, as well as mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, protein-protein interactions, and GPCR oligomerization. This review focuses on how the improved understanding of the molecular pharmacology of GPCRs, coupled with a plethora of novel HTS technologies, is leading to the discovery and development of an entirely new generation of GPCR-based therapeutics.