Search

Jean-Loup Mouysset,1 Beata Freier,2 Joan van den Bosch,3 Charles Briac Levaché,4 Alain Bols,5 Hans Werner Tessen,6 Laura Belton,7 G Chet Bohac,8 Jan-Henrik Terwey,9 Giuseppe Tonini101Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique Rambot Provencale, Aix en Provence, France; 2Clinical Oncology, Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny, Wroclaw, Poland; 3Department of Internal Medicine/Oncology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis locatie Dordwijk, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; 4Radiotherapy Service, Medical Oncology, Polyclinique Francheville, Périgueux, France; 5Central Pharmacy, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium; 6Private Oncology Practice. Goslar, Germany; 7LB Biostatistics, London, UK; 8Clinical Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; 9Medical Development – Oncology, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland; 10Department of Medical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, ItalyPurpose: To assess hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes and fatigue-related quality-of-life (QoL) (electronic assessment) in patients with solid tumors and symptomatic chemotherapy-induced anemia receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and darbepoetin alfa (DA) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent according to European indication.Methods: eAQUA was a Phase IV prospective observational study. The primary outcome (assessed in the primary analysis set [PAS]: patients receiving one or more DA dose who had baseline and week 9 assessments for Hb and QoL) was the proportion of patients receiving DA having both Hb increases ≥1 g/dL and improved QoL between baseline and week 9. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) subscale scores were anchored to fatigue visual analog scale scores to determine the minimally important difference for improved QoL. Overall data/data over time are reported for the full analysis set (patients receiving one or more erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose, n=1,158); week 9 data (ie, data relating to the primary and secondary outcomes) are reported for the PAS (n=510). Baseline and safety data are included for both the full analysis set and PAS.Results: In the PAS, 69% of patients had stage IV disease and 96% were fatigued. The minimally important difference in FACT-F change score for QoL improvement was 3.5. From baseline to week 9, 32% (95% confidence interval: 28%–36%) of patients had both improved QoL and an Hb increase ≥1 g/dL; proportions were similar across the most common tumor types. At week 9, 49% and 58% of patients had improved QoL or Hb increases ≥1 g/dL, respectively; 70% and 76% had QoL or Hb improvements between baseline and study end, respectively. In the PAS, 16% of patients required transfusions and 32% required iron supplementation. Few patients (

Purpose: This study aimed to prove the usefulness of the diagnostic plot, using the haemoglobin content of reticulocytes as a measure of functional iron deficiency (FID) and the ferritin index as a measure of iron availability, to customise anaemia treatment in cancer patients.Methods: Based on results of this plot, cancer patients fulfilling practice guideline criteria to receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were allocated to treatment with ESAs alone, iron alone or the combination of both. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients identified to require iron in addition or as an alternative to ESA therapy.Results: Out of 303 patients screened, 286 were allocated to treatment: 204 patients were normochromic and iron replete and treated with ESAs alone, 22 had both FID and anaemia of chronic disease and were treated with ESAs and parenteral iron, and 60 were iron-depleted and treated with iron only. After 8 weeks, a haemoglobin increase >1 g/dL from baseline was shown by 56% of patients treated with ESAs alone, by 100% of patients receiving the combination, by 50% of normochromic and by 73% of hypochromic iron-depleted patients receiving iron only. Acute phase reaction did not diminish the response rate to ESAs.Conclusions: The diagnostic plot was superior to transferrin saturation and ferritin in predicting iron availability in hypochromic patients treated with ESAs and proved useful to select treatment for anaemia in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all cancers. With nab-Paclitaxel/gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine/erlotinib, several treatment options are available which improve the patient's overall survival. Especially for patients who develop rash under erlotinib treatment can benefit from gemcitabine/erlotinib combination therapy. This non-interventional study (NIS ML21284) investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of gemcitabine/erlotinib therapy in the treatment routine of metastatic pancreatic cancer, in particular, in the context of the occurrence of a rash.Between 2007 and 2010, the treatment data of 433 patients in 98 centres were documented. All parameters recorded were assessed descriptively.Treatment with gemcitabine/erlotinib resulted in both a significant increased median overall survival of the patient subgroup with rash grade ≥ 1 (9.90; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 8.19 to 11.05 vs. 6.48 months; 95 % CI, 5.66 to 7.40, p = 0.0010) and median progression-free survival (5.43, 95 % CI, 4.90 to 6.12 vs. 3.98 months, 95 % CI, 3.52 to 5.03, p = 0.0131). The overall response rate of patients treated with gemcitabine/erlotinib, who had developed rash grade ≥ 1, was 5.9 % higher compared to patients without rash (31.7 % vs. 25.8 %).In conclusion, these results from the daily treatment routine of metastatic pancreatic cancer underline the importance of combined gemcitabine/erlotinib therapy for a subgroup of patients who develop a rash in the course of erlotinib treatment., Competing Interests: CBW erhält persönliche Honorare von Roche, Zuschüsse von Roche, persönliche Honorare von Celgene, RedHill und Ipsen außerhalb der eingereichten Arbeit.VH erhält Honorare von Roche, Merck, Amgen, Celgene, Boehringer; Beratertätigkeiten und Advisory Board von Roche, Merck, Celgene, Boehringer, BAXALTA, MSD, BMS, Halozyme; Forschungsgelder (Institution) von Roche, Celgene, Boehringer, Servier.HWT hat keinen Interessenkonflikt.MG hat ein Anstellungsverhältnis oder Führungsposition (Praxisinhaber Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Stolberg; Leiter des onkologischen Zentrum am Bethlehem Stolberg); Kongress- und Reisekostenunterstützung: Roche Pharma, Celegene, Ipsen, Onkovis; Beratungs- bzw. Gutachtertätigkeit: Roche Phama, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer; Honorare: Roche Pharma, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck, Celegene; Finanzierung wissenschaftlicher Untersuchungen: Roche Pharma, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, ioMedico, Pierre Fabre, Chugai, Onkovis, Celegene, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Eisai, Medac, Octapharma, Gilead, Teva, Merck.HGH hat keinen Interessenkonflikt.NB hat eine leitende Funktion bei iOMEDICO im Angestelltenverhältnis, erhält einen Travel Grant von Roche Pharma AG und ist Mitglied eines von der Roche Pharma AG organisierten Advisory Boards.MS hat keinen Interessenkonflikt.AB ist Mitarbeiter der F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Schweiz.WD gibt folgende Beratertätigkeiten an: Bayer Health Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, Shire Baxelta, Sirtex. Vortragstätigkeit: Bayer Health Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Shire Baxelta, Sirtex. Forschungsgelder: Roche Pharma AG., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Bevacizumab (Avastin®), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy has become a routine treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-authorization, non-interventional study 'AVAiLABLE' assessed the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment., Methods: Nine hundred and eighty-seven adult patients (mean age 61.5 years, 59.8% male) with non-resectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent, predominantly non-squamous NSCLC were evaluated at 185 sites across Germany. 72.8% of the patients had stage IV disease at start of observation, 90.1% had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma and 80.8% met the bevacizumab label 'NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology'. According to bevacizumab label, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab was recommended, followed by bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Effectiveness endpoints included response rates and progression-free survival (PFS); safety endpoints comprised adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Patients were followed until progression or intolerable toxicity. Data were evaluated by descriptive statistical methods., Results: Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI: 7.1; 8.4), overall response rate (ORR) 45.6% and disease control rate (DCR) 75%. The majority of patients (72.7%) achieved partial response or stable disease. Complete response was reached by 2.3%. 33.6% of patients experienced an ADR of grade ≥ 3. Bevacizumab-related ADRs of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 5.7% of patients, with the highest incidence for leukopenia, neutropenia, and hypertension., Conclusions: Results of the non-interventional study 'AVAiLABLE' confirmed the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in accordance with previous studies. No new safety signals were identified. Maintenance therapy with bevacizumab was well tolerated and safe even over extended periods (> 20 cycles)., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02596958; registered on 4 November 2015.

Objective: Azacitidine (Vidaza ® ) is the standard treatment for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In the noninterventional study PIAZA, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of azacitidine treatment in 149 patients with higher-risk MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in routine clinical practice., Method: Patients were treated according to physician's discretion. Besides evaluation of safety and effectiveness, impact of covariates on progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed., Results: Median age of patients was 75 years. 61.1% of patients were diagnosed with MDS, 31.5% with AML and 7.4% with CMML. Patients were treated with azacitidine for a median of seven cycles. Median PFS was 10.9 months. Median OS was 14.1 months. Two-year survival rate was 28.9%. 45.9% of patients showed CR or PR. Stable and progressive disease were observed in 37.2% and 8% of patients, respectively. Transfusion independence was reported in 64 of 89 patients. Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion before azacitidine therapy were identified as predictive factors for PFS., Conclusion: In conclusion, we estimated the duration of PFS in a real-world setting and identified ECOG PS and RBC transfusion as predictive factors for PFS. The safety of azacitidine showed a similar profile as demonstrated in the pivotal clinical trials., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The controlled phase III trial SATURN demonstrated that maintenance therapy with erlotinib after the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with advanced, non-progressive disease. We conducted the non-interventional study SATURN NIS to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of erlotinib maintenance in daily clinical practice., Methods: This single-arm NIS screened 290 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (stage IIIB or IV) and stable disease after standard platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in 95 institutions across Germany. Erlotinib was dosed and administered corresponding to the terms of the marketing authorization at the time of recruitment. The main effectiveness endpoint was subjects' OS at 1 year. Subgroup analyses of survival estimates of OS and PFS were performed., Results: 272 patients were eligible for analysis (median age 66 years, 37.1% females, 99.6% Caucasian, median ECOG performance status 1, 61.8% adenocarcinoma, 96.3% of patients with stable disease). Maintenance therapy with erlotinib resulted in median OS comparable to that of the SATURN phase III trial 10.4 months [95% CI: (8.8; 12.5) vs. 11.9 months]. The 1-year survival rate was 45.6% [95% CI: (37.5%; 53.6%)]. No new safety signals were observed. As expected, patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations derived a greater benefit concerning OS and PFS than EGFR-wild-type patients. Moreover, a significant association of OS and PFS and the smoking status was observed., Conclusions: The results of this non-interventional study support the current clinical practice of erlotinib switch maintenance in EGFR-mutation-positive patients.

Objectives: Real-life data on advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are centrally important to complement the results from clinical trials and to improve the standard of care. We present data on the choice of systemic first- and second-line treatment, number of treatment lines, survival and longitudinal data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients treated by medical oncologists in Germany., Materials and Methods: 1239 patients with advanced NSCLC were recruited at start of first-line therapy into the prospective German clinical cohort study TLK (Tumour Registry Lung Cancer) by 107 sites between February 2010 and December 2013 and followed-up until January 2016. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires., Results: Most patients receive carboplatin- or cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy in first-line treatment. The choice of platinum agent did neither influence the outcome: median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months for carboplatin combinations (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.0-13.8) and 11.9 months for cisplatin combinations (95% CI 10.2-13.8), nor did it have a marked impact on the HRQOL. Patients receiving cisplatin were younger and fitter at start of therapy than patients receiving carboplatin or mono-chemotherapy. The longitudinal HRQOL analysis revealed the main symptoms that need to be addressed in follow-up care, irrespective of the platinum agent: fatigue, nausea, dyspnoea and pain. The patients receiving targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had a median OS of 22.1 months (95% CI 15.0-35.1) and considerably superior HRQOL., Conclusion: There was no difference in outcome between the platinum compounds cisplatin and carboplatin in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in routine care. This is the first report of longitudinal HRQOL data comparing treatments, showing no difference between carboplatin and cisplatin., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dermatologic toxicities, especially akne-like skin rash, are the most common side-effects associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Preemptive treatment with oral tetracyclines is recommended as a standard. Topical prophylactic options have thus far not been compared to tetracyclines. In the current study, we sought to establish an alternative topical treatment., Patients and Methods: In this multicentre, randomized, open-label phase II study patients with (K)Ras-wildtype colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab were randomized (1:1) to receive either doxycycline 100 mg b.i.d. (standard arm) or erythromycin ointment 2% followed by doxycycline in case of insufficient activity. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients developing no skin toxicity ≥ grade 2 at any time during the first 8 weeks of panitumumab treatment. Skin toxicity was assessed using the NCI CTCAE v 4.0. Secondary endpoints comprised the assessment of skin toxicity using a more thorough grading system (WoMo score), evaluation of skin-related (DLQI) and global quality of life (EORTC QLQ C30)., Results: In total, 88 patients were included in this trial. 69% of the patients in the erythromycin arm suffered from skin toxicity of grade ≥ 2 versus 63% in the standard arm ( P = n.s .). However, as per WoMo score significantly more patients in the erythromycin arm developed moderate or severe skin toxicity at earlier time points. Skin related and overall quality of life was comparable between both arms., Conclusions: Based on this data erythromycin cannot be regarded as an alternative to doxycycline as prevention of EGFR-related skin toxicity., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST J. Quidde: Servier: Honoraria, Amgen: Travel grants A. Stein: Research funding: Sanofi, Roche, BMS, Merck; Advisory board: Sanofi, Amgen, Merck, Roche, BMS, MSD, Servier; Speaker`s fees: Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Servier, Bayer, Celgene, Lilly R.-D Hofheinz: Honoraria, Travel grants, research funding: Amgen All other authros reported no conflicts of interest.

Objective: In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), there is a high demand on effective therapies with a mild toxicity profile. Treosulfan is an alkylating agent approved as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Data on safety and efficacy for either formulation are rare. For the first time we conducted a randomized phase III study comparing both formulations in women with ROC., Methods: Patients having received at least two previous lines of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: treosulfan i.v. 7000 mg/m 2 d1 q4w or treosulfan p.o. 600 mg/m 2 d1-28 q8w. Primary endpoint was safety regarding hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity grade III/IV, secondary endpoints were other toxicities, clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and quality of life., Results: 250 patients were treated with treosulfan i.v. (128) or treosulfan p.o. (122). In general treosulfan therapy was well tolerated in both treatment arms. Leukopenia grade III/IV occurred significantly more frequently in the p.o. arm (3.9% i.v. arm, 14.8% p.o. arm, p = 0.002). Other toxicities were similar in both arms. CBR was comparable between arms (41.4% i.v. arm, 36.9% p.o. arm). No difference in TTP (3.7 months i.v. arm, 3.5 months p.o. arm) or OS (13.6 months i.v. arm, 10.4 months p.o. arm, p = 0.087) occurred., Conclusions: Given the safety and efficacy results treosulfan is an acceptable option for heavily pretreated OC patients. Regarding the toxicity profile the i.v. application was better tolerated with less grade III and IV toxicities., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standardsConflict of interestJalid Sehouli declares that he received an educational grant from medac. Michael Patrick Lux declares that he received honoraria for lectures, honoraria for editorial board membership of a journal as well as non-financial support for congress visit from medac. Tanja Trarbach declares that iOMEDICO received financial support from medac. Oliver Tomè, Oumar Camara, Ingo Bernhard Runnebaum, Hans Werner Tessen, Beate Rautenberg, Radoslav Chekerov and Gerald Gitsch declare that there are no conflicts of interest.Ethical approvalAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.Informed consentInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Background: Treatment recommendations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are based upon selected, otherwise healthy study populations mostly under 72 years of age. The Project group Internistic Oncology (PIO) embarked on an analysis of the 'real-world' safety and efficacy of bendamustine with and without rituximab in unselected outpatients., Patients and Methods: A multicenter, open-label, prospectively stratified, retrospective study was conducted to determine routine feasibility, toxicity, and response rates obtained by bendamustine with and without rituximab in a random population of mostly elderly patients with CLL. Records were obtained from 775 patients with CLL from 60 private medical oncology practices. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. The median observation time was 28 months. Patients were stratified according to age, and treatment. Response criteria and statistics followed international guidelines adopted by the "German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group"., Results: Overall, 57.5% of patients were over 70 (range=36-95) years old. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and age influenced the total dose given, decreasing by 20% between ECOG 0 and 3, and by 15% above 80 years old. Response rates did not differ between the ages of 60 to 80 years, with an overall remission rate for bendamustine of 83%, and for the combination therapy of 89%, decreasing above the age of 80 years. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 25% of 775 patients, and grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events in 9.55% (n=74), not interfering with the treatment., Conclusion: Bendamustine with and without rituximab was associated with high activity and tolerability, irrespective of age and risk factors. The median overall survival was 64 months with a 3-year survival rate of 72%; progression-free survival was 30.6 months, and the 3 year PFS was 43%. The good tolerability and feasibility of bendamustine with and without rituximab, in particular for the elderly population with CLL argues for it being a safe outpatient treatment., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Anemia is a major cause of morbidity in cancer. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) are a mainstay of treatment, although some patients lack response for unknown reasons. Recently, ESA dosing recommendations have changed and iron is increasingly used as an adjunct. Due to these changes, potential laboratory predictors of response were re-evaluated., Methods: This was a multi-center, observational study in cancer outpatients developing anemia under standard chemotherapy without absolute iron deficiency. For up to 12 weeks, laboratory data was collected while patients were treated with darbepoetin α (DA) either alone or along with intravenous iron. Baseline erythropoietin (Epo), changes in soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and in hemoglobin (Hb) early after treatment initiation were re-evaluated as response predictors, based on logistic regression models., Results: Overall, 279 patients (mean age 66.1 years, 59.5% female) entered the study; 171 (61%) received at least one iron dose along with DA. Response and its predictability hardly increased through adjunct iron, although baseline ferritin <100 mg/L resulted in a 10 times higher probability of response to the combination than to ESA alone. Baseline Epo had low predictive value, regardless of tumor type or use of adjunct iron, although it varied with sex and age. If criteria for all three - Epo, sTfR, and Hb - were met, probability of preventing transfusions was 97%, dropping to 44%, if all three failed., Conclusions: Changes in ESA treatment recommendations had no impact on the predictability of response. Best prediction is still based on the immediacy of Hb increase.

Background: Adjuvant treatment concepts have improved the 10-year cure rate of breast and colon cancer, but new treatments for metastatic disease have yielded only incremental benefit. If treatments for disseminated cancer were actually prolonging life rather than only increasing remission rates, this effect should have been documented over the last 30+ years. However, published data concerning advances in treatment for disseminated cancer have been contradictory., Patients and Methods: To add data-based information, we analyzed 2 sources: a regional population-based cancer registry (Hamburgisches Krebsregister, HKR), and a research cancer registry (Projektgruppe Internistische Onkologie, PIO). We compared the survival of several thousand patients with metastatic disease who received treatment only after dissemination with that of patients who received initial adjuvant therapy., Results: After adjuvant treatment, survival in patients with disseminated breast cancer is up to a third shorter than that of patients without adjuvant therapy., Conclusions: In accordance with published evidence, we conclude that ineffective adjuvant treatment shortens survival after documentation of metastatic disease. This is probably due to the elimination of chemo-sensitive tumor cells or to the induction of resistance in remaining micrometatases. This negative effect on survival after dissemination has been shown clearly for breast cancer and is also probable for cancer of the colon and other sites., (© 2013 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

Background: An increasing proportion of patients are exposed to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Re-exposure in the metastatic stage is limited by drug resistance, thus evaluation of non-cross-resistant regimens is mandatory., Methods: Anthracycline-pretreated patients were randomly assigned to three gemcitabine-based regimens. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1.000 mg m(-2) plus vinorelbin 25 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemVin), or plus cisplatin 30 mg m(-2) on days 1+8 (GemCis), or plus capecitabine 650 mg m(-2) b.i.d. orally days 1-14 (GemCap), q3w. The primary end point was response rate., Results: A total of 141 patients were recruited on the trial. The overall response rates were 39.0% (GemVin), 47.7% (GemCis) and 34.7% (GemCap). Median progression-free survival was estimated with 5.7, 6.9 and 8.3 months, respectively. Corresponding median survival times were 17.5 (GemVin), 13.0 (GemCis) and 19.4 months (GemCap). Neutropenia ≥grade 3 occurred in 16.7% (Gem/Vin), 4.4% (GemCis) and 0% (Gem/Cap), whereas non-haematological toxicities were rarely severe except grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 2.0% of the GemCap patients (per patient analysis)., Conclusions: This randomised phase II trial has revealed comparable results for three gemcitabine-based regimens regarding treatment efficacy and toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to be a worthwhile treatment option for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitors may be associated with increased bone loss., Patients and Methods: Two hundred patients were randomised to receive exemestane or tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 6 and 12 months treatment., Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients were assessable. Tamoxifen treatment resulted in a 0.5% increase from baseline in BMD at the spine, which was maintained at 12 months. Exemestane-treated patients experienced a 2.6% decrease from baseline in BMD at the spine at 6 months and a further 0.2% decrease at 12 months. There were significant differences in the changes in BMD between tamoxifen and exemestane at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0026 and P = 0.0008, respectively). The mean changes in BMD from baseline at the total hip were also significantly different between exemestane and tamoxifen at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference between tamoxifen and exemestane in mean changes in BMD from baseline at the femoral neck., Conclusions: Exemestane treatment resulted in an increase in bone loss at 6 months; bone loss stabilised after 6- to 12-month treatment.

To further characterize JAK2 exon 12 mutations, we performed molecular screening in 409 patients with polycythemia vera or unclear erythrocytosis with unmutated JAK2V617. The frequency of JAK2exon12 mutations was 10/63 (15.9%) in PV but only 5/346 (1.4%) in the erythrocytosis cases. Nine different mutations including four new types (D544-L545del, H538DK539LI540S, H538-K539del, V536-F547dup) were detected. In 2 cases we found evidence for the presence of cells homozygous for mutated JAK2exon12. As this was the case in only 2/15 cases with JAK2exon12 mutations (13%) homozygosity seemed to be less frequent than in V617F-mutated polycythemia vera (69%) (p<0.001). There were more females than males in the group of patients with a JAK2exon12 mutation (10 vs. 5) compared to the group with wildtype JAK2 (132 vs. 262; p=0.012). Median age of onset was lower than in the V617Fmut controls (58.5 vs. 67.8 years, p<0.001). In conclusion, JAK2 exon 12 mutation analysis contributes to diagnostics in polycythemia vera or erythrocytosis.

A 32 year old female smoker (20 pack years) presented with an asymptomatic lymphocytosis of 13,000/nl and splenomegaly. The patient's blood smear showed an absolute lymphocytosis with 65% atypical lymphocytes. A total of 1% of the lymphocytes were bilobulated. Bone marrow histology and immunphenotyping of blood and bone marrow excluded leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IgH-CDR-3 PCR analysis revealed a polyclonal pattern. In summary, a persistent polyclonal B-cell-lymphocytosis (PPBL) was diagnosed. The exact etiology of PPBL is still unclear, however, it is associated with a polyclonal raise in the lymphocyte count of CD27+IgD+-memory-B-lymphocytes due to a defect in apoptosis signaling and leukocyte homing to secondary lymphoid tissues. An association with cigarette smoking is obvious since all patients are smokers. From all published cases, only two developed a malignancy with an uncertain association with PPBL. We have been monitoring our patient for 6.5 years without any evidence of the development of a lymphoma.

In order to define the maximum tolerance level of combined carboplatin/etoposide dosage, patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with a fixed dose of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 iv on day 1) and escalating doses of etoposide starting with 80 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3. Five patients were given this starting and every following dose level. The daily dose of etoposide was increased in increments of 20 mg/m2 iv until severe myelosuppression occurred in 3 of 5 patients. Leuko- or thrombocytopenia WHO grade 3 or 4 occurred in 0/5 of the patients at the dose levels of 80 and 100 mg/m2, in 1/4 of the patients at the level of 120 mg/m2, in 2/5 of the patients at a level of 140 mg/m2, and 3/5 patients at a level of 160 mg/m2. Thus, increase in dosage was stopped at an etoposide dose of 160 mg/m2. Other side effects were mild and consisted predominantly of nausea and vomiting in 14/25 of the patients. The overall response rate was 40% with a 12% complete remission rate, median survival was 9.3 months and median progression-free survival totalled 4.3 months. These results indicate that combined carboplatin/etoposide is a well tolerated regimen in extensive-stage SCLC, with response rates comparable to those of other standard protocols. Using treatment intervals of 4 weeks the recommended dose of etoposide in combination with 300 mg/m2 carboplatin was identified as 140 mg/m2 iv for 3 consecutive days.

Tauromustine (TCNU) is a newly developed nitrosourea compound. As a result of molecular modification, TCNU is more hydrophilic than BCNU and CCNU. In experimental data there was a high therapeutic index, especially in Walker 256 carcinosarcoma in rats, and in phase I trials antitumor activity was observed in NSCLC (10/33 remissions). There was also activity in melanoma, breast cancer, pleuramesotheliomas and ovarian cancer. To determine the effectiveness, duration of response and toxicity of TCNU the following phase II trial was performed. Patients received 130 mg/m2 TCNU every 35 days orally. Twenty-five patients were treated; 22 were evaluable. The female/male ratio was 18/4, 1 patient was stage III, 21 patients stage IV, the mean age was 62.3 years (range 32-70). Between 1 and 4 courses (mean 1.9) were administered. Histology was as follows: 6 squamous cell, 11 adenocarcinoma, 2 large cell and 3 polymorph cell carcinomas. No objective response (CR + PR) was observed; 6/18 patients had stable disease, 7/18 progression and 5/18 early progression. The median survival time is 4.9 months. The most severe side effect was thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3 + 4, 4/22 patients). TCNU administered at this dose and schedule does not show substantial antitumor activity in patients with NSCLC. The fact that no objective tumor remission was observed suggests that the true response rate is less than 20% (p less than 0.05). It is improbable that TCNU has a relevant impact on the course of inoperable NSCLC.

192 untreated patients with a histologically verified non-small cell lung carcinoma were treated within 3 phase-II studies with different chemotherapy regimens: ifosfamide 2 g/m2 day 1-5 and cis-platinum 75 mg/m2 on day 1 (study I); ifosfamide 2 g/m2 days 1-5 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 days 1-3 (study II); ifosfamide 2 g/m2 days 1-5 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (study III). All chemotherapy combinations were repeated every 4 weeks. One therapy with at least 2 courses was the minimum criterion for evaluating the remission rate. We observed complete remissions in 5 patients, and partial remissions in 54 patients (remission rate 31%). The median duration of remission was 7 months, the time to progression 5 months. The median survival time of all 192 patients was calculated as 8.5 months. The performance status had a significant influence on the remission state and the survival time of the patients. The sex and age of the patients as well as the extension and the histological type of the tumor had no influence. Concerning the remission rate and the survival time, there was no significant difference between the 3 therapy regimens. Due to the lesser toxicity, the combination ifosfamide/etoposide was the best.