Search

The aim of this study was to define the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations by using 3-dimensional multislice computed tomographic data. Optimal fluoroscopic projections are crucial for coronary imaging and interventions. Historically, coronary fluoroscopic viewing angles were derived empirically from experienced operators. In this analysis, 100 consecutive patients who underwent computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) for suspected coronary artery disease were studied. A CTCA-based method is described to define optimal viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations to guide percutaneous coronary interventions. The average optimal viewing angle for ostial left main stenting was left anterior oblique (LAO) 37°, cranial (CRA) 22° (95% confidence interval [CI]: LAO 33° to 40°, CRA 19° to 25°) and for ostial right coronary stenting was LAO 79°, CRA 41° (95% CI: LAO 74° to 84°, CRA 37° to 45°). Estimated mean optimal viewing angles for bifurcation stenting were as follows: left main: LAO 0°, caudal (CAU) 49° (95% CI: right anterior oblique [RAO] 8° to LAO 8°, CAU 43° to 54°); left anterior descending with first diagonal branch: LAO 11°, CRA 71° (95% CI: RAO 6° to LAO 27°, CRA 66° to 77°); left circumflex bifurcation with first marginal branch: LAO 24°, CAU 33° (95% CI: LAO 15° to 33°, CAU 25° to 41°); and posterior descending artery and posterolateral branch: LAO 44°, CRA 34° (95% CI: LAO 35° to 52°, CRA 27° to 41°). CTCA can suggest optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of coronary artery ostia and bifurcations. As the frequency of use of diagnostic CTCA increases in the future, it has the potential to provide additional information for planning and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transcatheter interventions are currently undertaken using “generic” fluoroscopic viewing angles. However, the position and orientation of heart structures may vary across patients and disease-specific remodeling processes. Objective This study uses multislice computed tomography to determine optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of the aortic and mitral annuli, the left atrial appendage and the atrial septum. We explored differences between patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods and results The multislice computed tomographies of 28 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and 32 patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (MR) were analyzed. For each patient, we evaluated the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of the aortic and mitral annuli ( en face , maximal and minimal diameters, aortic root with right, left and non coronary sinus in center), left atrial appendage orifice ( en face , maximal and minimal diameters), and atrial septum (fossa ovalis) en face . The TAVR implantation view with right coronary sinus in center was LAO 9 – CRA 0 in the AS group and LAO 6 – CAU 5 in the MR group (p = NS). AS and MR patients differed significantly with respect to the fluoroscopic angulation of the aortic annulus en face (8.3°), the aortic annulus maximal (17.7°) and minimal (18.5°) diameters, the mitral annulus aorto-mural diameter (11.3°), and the left atrial appendage orifice en face (11.1°) (all p-values<0.05). Conclusion Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of left-sided structures vary considerably between patients. Multislice computed tomography is a valuable tool to determine the most procedurally relevant angulations, with the potential to optimize procedural safety, efficacy and duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We sought to determine if preprocedural CT can predict appropriate fluoroscopic angulations to achieve a coplanar view during transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) and to assess the relationship of the mitral annulus and the coronary sinus to determine the feasibility of using this as an additional landmark on fluoroscopy. Methods With CT, the mitral annulus was segmented in 25 patients with functional mitral regurgitation. After this, optimal projection curves were plotted and the necessary angulations for specific views parallel to the trigone-to-trigone line (TT view) and septal-to-lateral distance (SL view) were noted. The outer contour of the coronary sinus and great cardiac vein were segmented to simulate a guide wire, and its relation to the annular plane was assessed. Employed angulations and coplanarity of device depiction were investigated in 4 patients who underwent TMVI. Results The mitral annulus is oriented in an anterior superior fashion with tilting to the right. SL and TT views were found at 29.4 ± 9.0° right anterior oblique (RAO), 20.1 ± 8.7° cranial (CAU) and 81.6 ± 18.9° RAO, 56.7 ± 8.0° caudal (CAU). The optimal projection curve and the relationship of coronary sinus to the mitral annular plane showed a wide intersubject variability. Commonly, the coronary sinus passed along the atrial wall with a mean distance of 13.2 ± 3.7 mm toward the mitral annular plane at P2 and 1.4 ± 3.1 mm anteriorly in alignment with the TT line. Coplanar depiction of the TMVI prosthesis was achieved in all 4 patients, with a compromise view chosen on the optimal projection curve between the TT view and SL view. Conclusion CT allows for prediction of optimal fluoroscopic angulations to achieve a coplanar view of the mitral annulus. The relationship of the coronary sinus to the mitral annulus is variable and preprocedural CT segmentation may allow for a more patient-specific approach to the use of a coronary sinus guide wire as a fluoroscopic landmark. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the introduction of transcatheter structural heart therapies, cardiologists are increasingly aware of the importance of understanding anatomical details of left-sided heart structures. Understanding fluoroscopic cardiac anatomy can facilitate optimal positioning and deployment of prostheses during transcatheter valve repair/replacement, left atrial appendage occlusion, septal defect closure, and paravalvular leak closure. It is possible to use multislice computed tomography to determine optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles for such transcatheter therapies. The purpose of this paper is to describe how optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of left-sided heart structures can be obtained using computed tomography. Two- and 3-chamber views are described and may become standard in the context of transcatheter structural heart interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study sought to analyse multislice computed tomography (MSCT) data of patients with tricuspid regurgitation and to report the variability of fluoroscopic viewing angles for several right-sided heart structures, as well as chamber views of the right heart in order to determine the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of six right-sided heart structures and right-heart chamber views., Methods and Results: The MSCT data of 44 patients with mild to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were retrospectively analysed. For each patient, we determined the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of the annulus/orifice en face view of the tricuspid valve, atrial septum, superior vena cava (SVC), inferior vena cava (IVC), coronary sinus (CS) and pulmonary valve. In this TR patient cohort, the average fluoroscopic viewing angle for the en face view of the tricuspid valve annulus was LAO 54-CAUD 15; RAO 10-CAUD 66 for the SVC orifice; LAO 27-CRA 59 for the IVC orifice; RAO 28-CRA 19 for the CS orifice; RAO 33-CAUD 33 for the atrial septum and LAO 13-CAUD 52 for the pulmonary valve annulus. The average viewing angle for right-heart chamber views was LAO 55-CAUD 15 for the one-chamber view; RAO 59-CAUD 54 for the two-chamber view; RAO 27-CRA 19 for the three-chamber view and LAO 5-CRA 60 for the four-chamber view., Conclusions: MSCT can provide patient-specific fluoroscopic viewing angles of right-sided heart structures. This information may facilitate transcatheter right-heart interventions.

Performing transcatheter valve interventions requires a thorough knowledge of right heart imaging. Integration of chamber views across the spectrum of imaging modalities (i.e., multislice computed tomography, fluoroscopy, and echocardiography) can facilitate complex transcatheter interventions. Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles for guiding interventional procedures can be obtained using preprocedural multislice computed tomography scans. The present manuscript describes the fluoroscopic viewing angles necessary, when using multislice computed tomography, to appreciate heart chamber anatomy and their relationship to echocardiography.

Performing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions requires a thorough knowledge of right-heart imaging. Integration of chamber views across the spectrum of imaging modalities (i.e., multislice computed tomography, fluoroscopy, and echocardiography) can facilitate transcatheter interventions on the right heart. Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles for guiding interventional procedures can be obtained using pre-procedural multislice computed tomography scans. The present paper describes fluoroscopic viewing angles necessary to appreciate right-heart chamber anatomy and their relationship to echocardiography using multislice computed tomography., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for a failing surgical bioprosthesis (TAV-in-SAV) has become an alternative for patients at high risk for redo surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR). Comparisons between these approaches are non-existent. This study aimed to compare clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients undergoing TAV-in-SAV versus redo-SAVR after accounting for baseline differences by propensity score matching., Methods and Results: Patients from seven centres in Europe and Canada who had undergone either TAV-in-SAV (n=79) or redo-SAVR (n=126) were identified. Significant independent predictors used for propensity scoring were age, NYHA functional class, number of prior cardiac surgeries, urgent procedure, pulmonary hypertension, and COPD grade. Using a calliper range of ±0.05, a total of 78 well-matched patient pairs were found. All-cause mortality was similar between groups at 30 days (6.4% redo-SAVR vs. 3.9% TAV-in-SAV; p=0.49) and one year (13.1% redo-SAVR vs. 12.3% TAV-in-SAV; p=0.80). Both groups also showed similar incidences of stroke (0% redo-SAVR vs. 1.3% TAV-in-SAV; p=1.0) and new pacemaker implantation (10.3% redo-SAVR vs. 10.3% TAV-in-SAV; p=1.0). The incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was numerically lower in the TAV-in-SAV group (11.5% redo-SAVR vs. 3.8% TAV-in-SAV; p=0.13). The TAV-in-SAV group had a significantly shorter median total hospital stay (12 days redo-SAVR vs. 9 days TAV-in-SAV; p=0.001)., Conclusions: Patients with aortic bioprosthesis failure treated with either redo-SAVR or TAV-in-SAV have similar 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes.

Paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurs in 6%-15% of cases after surgical heart valve replacement. A percutaneous approach is increasingly used to close PVLs as an alternative to repeat surgery. Computed tomography (CT) can be used for simulation of fluoroscopic cardiac anatomy. This technique allows preprocedural definition of optimal C-arm angulations and PVL localization in reference to fluoroscopic views. It is very helpful for guidewire crossing of the PVL and positioning of the closure device. We report a case with the first use of dedicated software for fluoroscopic simulation (FluoroCT) in transcatheter mitral PVL closure.

Background and Aim of the Study: The surgical correction of functional mitral regurgitation (MR) remains challenging and controversial. The study aim was to systematically review the outcomes of surgical mitral valve repair (MVRpr) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with significant functional MR and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction., Methods: A meta-analysis was performed of published data acquired from patients with moderate to severe functional MR and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% who underwent surgical MVRpr or MVR. The data were meta-analyzed across studies using Bayesian hierarchical models when feasible., Results: The search yielded 36 observational studies. The pooled proportion of operative mortality following MVRpr was 5% (33 studies; 2,231 patients; 95% credible interval (CrI) 4-7%), while that following MVR was 10% (10 studies; 389 patients; 95% CrI 5-18%). For patients undergoing MVRpr, pooled proportions of postoperative cerebrovascular accidents and renal failure were 2% (11 studies; 750 patients; 95% CrI 1-3%) and 9% (11 studies; 756 patients; 95% CrI 5-16%), respectively. The five-year actuarial survival rates following MVRpr across 12 studies ranged from 47% to 78% (median 66%)., Conclusions: In selected patients with significant functional MR and LV dysfunction, surgical MVRpr and MVR can be performed with acceptable intermediate operative mortality risks.

Aims: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an emerging technology with the potential to treat patients with severe mitral regurgitation at excessive risk for surgical mitral valve surgery. Multimodality imaging of the mitral valvular complex and surrounding structures will be an important component for patient selection for TMVR. Our aim was to describe and evaluate a systematic multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) image analysis methodology that provides measurements relevant for transcatheter mitral valve replacement., Methods and Results: A systematic step-by-step measurement methodology is described for structures of the mitral valvular complex including: the mitral valve annulus, left ventricle, left atrium, papillary muscles and left ventricular outflow tract. To evaluate reproducibility, two observers applied this methodology to a retrospective series of 49 cardiac MSCT scans in patients with heart failure and significant mitral regurgitation. For each of 25 geometrical metrics, we evaluated inter-observer difference and intra-class correlation. The inter-observer difference was below 10% and the intra-class correlation was above 0.81 for measurements of critical importance in the sizing of TMVR devices: the mitral valve annulus diameters, area, perimeter, the inter-trigone distance, and the aorto-mitral angle., Conclusions: MSCT can provide measurements that are important for patient selection and sizing of TMVR devices. These measurements have excellent inter-observer reproducibility in patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

Aims: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an emerging technology with the potential to treat patients with mitral regurgitation at excessive risk for mitral valve surgery. Geometrical measurements of the mitral valvular complex may have implications for the design of TMVR devices and for patient selection. This study sought to quantify the dynamic geometry of the mitral valvular complex in patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT)., Methods and Results: MSCT images were acquired in 32 patients with symptomatic, significant FMR. Two independent observers analysed image sets using a dedicated software package and a standard measurement methodology. In patients with FMR, the mean mitral annulus intercommissural and aorto-mural diameters were, respectively, 41.5±5.2 mm and 38.7±5.9 mm in systole, and were 41.5±4.4 mm and 40.0±4.7 mm in diastole. In patients without MR, the diameters were, respectively, 33.6±5.1 mm and 28.8±8.0 mm in systole, and 36.2±4.5 mm and 31.6±7.9 mm in diastole. The obstacle-free zone below the mitral annulus averaged more than 20.0 mm and varied by less than 1 mm between systole and diastole, which is not statistically significant. The aorto-mitral angle was 129.7±10.5° in systole and 131.0±9.4° in diastole., Conclusions: The mitral annulus is larger in dimension, more circular, and less dynamic in patients with FMR. The obstacle-free zone below the mitral annulus is relatively constant during the cardiac cycle. Measurements of the mitral valvular apparatus vary considerably between patients, which suggests that tridimensional imaging will play an important role in the sizing of TMVR devices.

Transcatheter cardiac interventions are a fast evolving field. The past decade has seen the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement, septal defect closure devices and left atrial appendage closure devices for thromboprophylaxis. More than ever, medical imaging is taking a central role in the care of patients with structural heart disease. In this review article we outline the use of MSCT as a tool for diagnosis of structural heart interventions, as well as patient selection, pre-procedural planning, device sizing and post-procedural assessment. We focus on procedures targeting the aortic valve, the mitral valve, the inter-atrial septum and the left atrial appendage., Competing Interests: Disclosure: P Thériault-Lauzier is co-founder of FluoroCT Software; Marco Spaziano is a consultant for FluoroCT Software; G Martucci is a proctor for Medtronic and a consultant FluoroCT Software; N Piazza is a proctor and consultant for Medtronic and co-founder of FluoroCT Software; B Vaquerizo and J Buithieu have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Aims: A comprehensive description of transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure has not been performed. We undertook a systematic review to investigate the aetiology, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of THV failure., Methods and Results: The systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Between December 2002 and March 2014, 70 publications reported 87 individual cases of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) failure. Similar to surgical bioprosthetic heart valve failure, we observed cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) (n = 34), structural valve failure (n = 13), and THV thrombosis (n = 15). The microbiological profile of THV PVE was similar to surgical PVE, though one-quarter had satellite mitral valve endocarditis, and surgical intervention was required in 40% (75% survival). Structural valve failure occurred most frequently due to leaflet calcification and was predominantly treated by redo-THV (60%). Transcatheter heart valve thrombosis occurred at a mean 9 ± 7 months post-implantation and was successfully treated by prolonged anticoagulation in three-quarters of cases. Two novel causes of THV failure were identified: late THV embolization (n = 18); and THV compression (n = 7) following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These failure modes have not been reported in the surgical literature. Potential risk factors for late THV embolization include low prosthesis implantation, THV undersizing/underexpansion, bicuspid, and non-calcified anatomy. Transcatheter heart valve embolization mandated surgery in 80% of patients. Transcatheter heart valve compression was noted at post-mortem in most cases., Conclusion: Transcatheter heart valves are susceptible to failure modes typical to those of surgical bioprostheses and unique to their specific design. Transcatheter heart valve compression and late embolization represent complications previously unreported in the surgical literature., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Limited information exists describing the results of transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease (TAV-in-BAV)., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of a large cohort of patients undergoing TAV-in-BAV., Methods: We retrospectively collected baseline characteristics, procedural data, and clinical follow-up findings from 12 centers in Europe and Canada that had performed TAV-in-BAV., Results: A total of 139 patients underwent TAV-in-BAV with the balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) (n = 48) or self-expandable THV (n = 91) systems. Patient mean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality scores were 78.0 ± 8.9 years and 4.9 ± 3.4%, respectively. BAV stenosis occurred in 65.5%, regurgitation in 0.7%, and mixed disease in 33.8% of patients. Incidence of type 0 BAV was 26.7%; type 1 BAV was 68.3%; and type 2 BAV was 5.0%. Multislice computed tomography (MSCT)-based TAV sizing was used in 63.5% of patients (77.1% balloon-expandable THV vs. 56.0% self-expandable THV, p = 0.02). Procedural mortality was 3.6%, with TAV embolization in 2.2% and conversion to surgery in 2.2%. The mean aortic gradient decreased from 48.7 ± 16.5 mm Hg to 11.4 ± 9.9 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Post-implantation aortic regurgitation (AR) grade ≥ 2 occurred in 28.4% (19.6% balloon-expandable THV vs. 32.2% self-expandable THV, p = 0.11) but was prevalent in only 17.4% when MSCT-based TAV sizing was performed (16.7% balloon-expandable THV vs. 17.6% self-expandable THV, p = 0.99). MSCT sizing was associated with reduced AR on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.19, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.08 to 0.45; p < 0.0001). Thirty-day device safety, success, and efficacy were noted in 79.1%, 89.9%, and 84.9% of patients, respectively. One-year mortality was 17.5%. Major vascular complications were associated with increased 1-year mortality (OR: 5.66, 95% CI: 1.21 to 26.43; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: TAV-in-BAV is feasible with encouraging short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes. Importantly, a high incidence of post-implantation AR is observed, which appears to be mitigated by MSCT-based TAV sizing. Given the suboptimal echocardiographic results, further study is required to evaluate long-term efficacy., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)