Search

BackgroundAnti-PD1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The activity of ICI across NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations is poorly characterized. The aim of our study was to address the efficacy of ICI in the context of oncogenic addiction.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective study for patients receiving ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with at least one oncogenic driver alteration. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for ICI therapy: best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. The primary end point was PFS under ICI. Secondary end points were best response (RECIST 1.1) and OS from ICI initiation.ResultsWe studied 551 patients treated in 24 centers from 10 countries. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 271), EGFR (n = 125), BRAF (n = 43), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 29), ALK (n = 23), RET (n = 16), ROS1 (n = 7), and multiple drivers (n = 1). Median age was 60 years, gender ratio was 1 : 1, never/former/current smokers were 28%/51%/21%, respectively, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate by driver alteration was: KRAS = 26%, BRAF = 24%, ROS1 = 17%, MET = 16%, EGFR = 12%, HER2 = 7%, RET = 6%, and ALK = 0%. In the entire cohort, median PFS was 2.8 months, OS 13.3 months, and the best response rate 19%. In a subgroup analysis, median PFS (in months) was 2.1 for EGFR, 3.2 for KRAS, 2.5 for ALK, 3.1 for BRAF, 2.5 for HER2, 2.1 for RET, and 3.4 for MET. In certain subgroups, PFS was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (KRAS, EGFR) and with smoking status (BRAF, HER2).Conclusions: ICI induced regression in some tumors with actionable driver alterations, but clinical activity was lower compared with the KRAS group and the lack of response in the ALK group was notable. Patients with actionable tumor alterations should receive targeted therapies and chemotherapy before considering immunotherapy as a single agent.

Background: The success of BH3 mimetics in hematological malignancies has spurred interest in their application in solid tumors. We examined the expression of the BCL-2 family of molecules in NPC tumors and cell lines and explored the anticancer efficacy of BH3 mimetics in vitro., Methods: Immunohistochemistry for BCL-2, MCL-1, BCL-xL, and transcriptomic analyses was conducted on NPC tumors. The efficacy of ABT-199, S63845, and ABT-737 were examined as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin in NPC cell lines. RNA sequencing was performed to identify up and downregulated pathways in sensitive cell lines., Results: One hundred and forty-nine EBV-positive NPC and 15 EBV-negative NPC were identified. Expression of BCL-2 was more frequent in EBV-positive NPC. BCL-2, MCL-1, and BCL-xL expression was not prognostic for overall survival. Marked sensitivity was seen with the combination of S63845 and cisplatin in NPC43., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of combining cisplatin and S63845, which warrants further investigation., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.

Non-melanomatous cutaneous spindle cell neoplasms are a rare group of malignancies that present a diagnostic challenge, and for which there is a lack of consensus on how to best manage patients with advanced disease and only limited reports of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responses. In this study, we performed a single-center retrospective review of treatment outcomes for all advanced non-melanomatous cutaneous spindle cell neoplasms treated with ICIs. Blinded histopathology reviews occurred to confirm each diagnosis. Comprehensive tumour profiling included whole exome sequencing for tumour mutational burden (TMB) and ultraviolet(UV) signatures, and immunohistochemistry for immune-cell infiltration (CD4/CD3/CD8/CD103/CD20) and immune-checkpoint expression (PD-L1/LAG3/TIGIT). Seven patients were identified. The objective response rate was 86% (6/7) with five complete responses (CR). Responses were durable with two patients in CR > 30 months after ICI commencement. All patients had high TMB and UV signatures. One patient had PD-L1 100% (combined positive score) with abundant immune-cell infiltration and LAG3 expression. In advanced non-melanomatous cutaneous spindle cell neoplasms, excellent responses to ICIs with durable disease control were observed. ICIs are worthy of further exploration in these patients. UV signatures and high TMB could be used to help select patients for treatment.

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of tongue cancer is vital for achieving optimal patient outcomes. Nursing and allied health professionals play essential roles within the team. We developed symposia comprising a series of online lectures offering a detailed perspective on the role each discipline and consumer perspective has in the management of patients with tongue cancer. The topics, including epidemiology and prevention, diagnosis, treatment planning, surgery, adjuvant care, and the management of recurrent or metastatic disease, were thoroughly examined. The symposia highlighted the significance of fostering collaboration and continuous learning through a multidisciplinary approach. This initiative should be relevant to healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers striving to enhance patient outcomes in tongue cancer care through innovative collaboration.

Objectives: The incidence of human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+OPC) is increasing, and new biomarkers are required to better define prognostic groups and guide treatment. Infiltrating T cells have been well studied in head and neck cancer, however the presence and role of B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in the tumor microenvironment has not, even though the interplay between T and B cells is increasingly being recognised., Materials and Methods: Using CD20 immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify B cells and TLS in a cohort of 159 HPV + OPC patients, we semi-quantitatively scored abundance and location (intra-tumoral or stromal) and correlated findings with patient survival., Results: 32% (51/157) of patients had high intra-tumoral (IT) abundance of CD20 + B cells (≥5%) and this was prognostic for improved overall survival (OS) with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.2 (95 % CI 0.0-0.7, p = 0.014). We validated our results in an independent cohort comprising 171 HPV + OPC where 14% (23/171) were IT CD20 + high, again showing improved survival with an adjusted HR for OS of 0.2 (95 % CI 0.0-1.4, p = 0.003). Neither stromal abundance nor the presence of TLS were prognostic in either cohort. B cells were subtyped by multispectral IHC, identifying CD20 + CD27 + cells, consistent with memory B cells, as the predominant subtype. Combined with validated biomarker CD103, a marker of tissue-resident memory T cells, IT CD20 + B cells abundance was able to prognostically stratify patients further., Conclusions: CD20 + B cell abundance has the potential to be used as a biomarker to identify good and poor prognosis HPV + OPC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials owing to exclusionary comorbidities, which are more common with age. Chemotherapy is poorly tolerated in older comorbid advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) patients; however, little is known on the efficacy and tolerability of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this population. To our knowledge, this is the largest dedicated report on a cohort of older patients with advanced CSCC treated with immunotherapy to date., Objective: The aim was to report outcomes of ICI use in a real-world older cohort with advanced CSCC., Patients and Methods: A single-centre retrospective audit of all patients treated via an access scheme providing ICIs to patients with advanced CSCC was conducted. Participants were ≥ 70 years of age and had advanced CSCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. Best overall response rate (ORR), 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity rates were assessed., Results: A total of 53 patients were analysed. The median age was 81.8 years (range 70.1-96.8); 81% were male; 34% were immunocompromised; and 34% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≥ 2. The ORR was 57%, and 12-month OS and PFS were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-78) and 41% (95% CI 25-57), respectively. Thirty-two per cent developed an immune-related adverse event (irAE), but only two patients experienced a grade 3 irAE, with no treatment-related deaths. Higher ECOG score was associated with worse OS and PFS. No significant association was identified for increasing age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, or immunocompromised status., Conclusions: ICIs have demonstrated efficacy and have an acceptable safety profile among older patients with advanced CSCC, with comparable efficacy to what has been demonstrated in current clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) are the second most diagnosed skin cancer worldwide; however, little is known about the pathobiological factors that contribute to the diverse clinical outcomes seen., Objectives: To profile cSCCs comprehensively and identify the pathological processes that contribute to the disparities seen in their clinical behaviour., Methods: We characterized the genomic, transcriptomic and immunohistochemical profiles of 211 cSCC tumours, including 37 cSCCs from immunocompromised patients., Results: cSCCs from immunocompromised patients were characterized by a lack of B cells in the peritumoral stroma compared with immunocompetent patients. Further, an abundance of a memory B-cell-like population in the peritumoral stroma was associated with a better prognosis in all patients (immunocompetent and immunocompromised), as well as only immunocompetent patients. No differences in genetic -variants, tumour mutational burden or mutational signatures were observed between cSCCs from immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Thus, differences in survival between cSCCs from immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients are not likely to be driven by tumour genomic factors, but may be associated with differential host immune response. cSCC not from a primary head and neck site had lower tumour mutational burden and exhibited upregulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition programme compared with head and neck cSCC. Both factors were implicated with poorer responses to immune checkpoint inhibition, and the latter with poorer survival., Conclusions: We identified tumour and host immune factors that contribute to the disparate clinical behaviour of cSCC, with broad translational application, including prognostication, treatment prediction to current therapies and the identification of novel anticancer therapy approaches in cSCC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: A.A.T. has served on advisory boards for/received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and La Roche Posay. N.W.B. has received speaker’s honoraria for lectures and served on advisory boards for Astra Zeneca. D.R. has received grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Decibel Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Roche, Regeneron, Kura Oncology and ALX Oncology; and has been on trial steering committees and/or advisory boards (all uncompensated) for MSD, GSK, Regeneron and Sanofi. B.J.S. has served on advisory boards for/received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Takeda and Janssen; and has received research funding from Sanofi. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common skin cancer diagnosed worldwide. CSCC is generally localized and managed with local therapies such as excision and/or radiotherapy. For patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, recent improvements in our understanding of the underlying biology have led to significant advancements in treatment approaches-including the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI)-which have resulted in substantial gains in response and survival compared to traditional cytotoxic approaches. However, there is a lack of understanding of the biology underpinning CSCC in immunocompromised patients, in whom the risk of developing CSCC is hundreds of times higher compared to immunocompetent patients. Furthermore, current ICI approaches are associated with significant risk of graft rejection in organ transplant recipients who make up a significant proportion of immunocompromised patients. Ongoing scientific and clinical research efforts are needed in order to maintain momentum to increase our understanding and refine our therapeutic approaches for patients with CSCC.

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with an estimated 2 million new cases and 1·76 million deaths per year. Substantial improvements in our understanding of disease biology, application of predictive biomarkers, and refinements in treatment have led to remarkable progress in the past two decades and transformed outcomes for many patients. This seminar provides an overview of advances in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, with a particular focus on targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests BJS reports personal fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and Loxo Oncology outside the submitted work. JFG has served as a consultant or received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Ariad/Takeda, Loxo/Lilly, Blueprint, Oncorus, Regeneron, Gilead, Helsinn, EMD Serono, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Incyte, Novartis, Merck, Agios, Amgen, and Array; has had research support from Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Ariad/Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Tesaro, Moderna, Blueprint, Jounce, Array Biopharma, Merck, Adaptimmune, and Alexo; and has an immediate family member who is an employee of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. LVS reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca; grants from Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim; grants and consulting fees from Genentech Blueprint and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals; and consulting fees from Janssen and grants from LOXO, all outside the submitted work. LVS has a patent about treatment of EGFR-mutant cancer pending. RSH reports honoraria from Novartis, Merck KGaA, Daichii Sankyo, Pfizer, Roche, Apollomics, Tarveda, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and grants from Novartis, Genentech Roche, Corvus, Incyte, Exelixis, Abbvie, Daichii Sankyo, Agios, Mirati, Turning Point, and Lilly when writing this Seminar. AAT declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To provide pooled longer term data from three groups of a phase 2 study of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), and to determine duration of response (DOR) and impact on quality of life (QoL)., Methods: Patients received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (group 1, metastatic CSCC [mCSCC], n=59; group 2, locally advanced CSCC, n=78) or cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (group 3, mCSCC, n=56). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per independent central review (ICR). QoL was repeatedly measured at day 1 of each treatment cycle (groups 1 and 2: 8 weeks; group 3: 9 weeks)., Results: Median duration of follow-up was 15.7 months. Overall, ORR per ICR was 46.1% (95% CI: 38.9% to 53.4%). Complete response (CR) rates were 20.3%, 12.8%, and 16.1% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Median time to CR was 11.2 months. Among patients with partial response or CR, the estimated proportion of patients with ongoing response at 12 months from the first objective response was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.5% to 93.3%), with median DOR not reached. Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of overall survival (OS) was 73.3% (95% CI: 66.1% to 79.2%) at 24 months, with median OS not reached. Global Health Status (GHS)/QoL improvements were observed as early as cycle 2 and were significantly improved and durable until last assessment. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to first clinically meaningful improvement for pain was 2.1 (95% CI: 2.0 to 3.7) months and was significantly improved in responders versus non-responders (p<0.0001)., Conclusions: This is the largest (n=193) clinical dataset for a programmed cell death-1 inhibitor against advanced CSCC, confirming the sustained substantial clinical activity of cemiplimab in these patients, including new findings of improved CR rates over time, increasing DOR, and durable pain control and GHS/QoL improvement., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02760498), https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT02760498., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DR—institutional research grant and funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; uncompensated scientific committee and advisory board from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and travel and accommodation from Merck Sharp & Dohme and GlaxoSmithKline. NIK—grants from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; grants and advisory board fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and HUYA Bioscience International; advisory board fees from EMD Serono, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, AstraZeneca (data safety monitoring committee), Incyte (data safety monitoring committee), Iovance, Merck, ARRAY Biopharma, Jounce Therapeutics, and Immunocore; grants from Merck, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, and Amgen; honorarium from Sanofi; and common stock ownership of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Mazor Robotics, Amarin, and Transenetrix. CDS—steering committee member for Castle Biosciences; steering committee member and consultant for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; consultant for Sanofi; received research funding from Castle Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Genentech, and Merck; and is a chair for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. AG—personal fees and non-financial support (advisory board and travel support) from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sun Pharma; personal fees (advisory board) from Merck KGaA, Eisai, and Pfizer; non-financial (travel) support from Astellas; and clinical trial unit support from PPD Australia. ALSC—consulting and advisory roles at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Merck; and research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Galderma, Jounce Therapeutics, and Merck. KDL—grants and personal fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study. AML—uncompensated advisory board from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Bristol-Myers Squibb with travel and accommodation expenses; and uncompensated consultancy for Eisai. LH-A—performed consulting and advisory roles at Massive Bio; speakers’ bureau roles at Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Immunocore, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Polynoma, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, MedImmune, and Takeda. BGMH—consulting or advisory roles at Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Eisai, and Merck; and institutional research funding from Amgen. DS—institutional patients’ fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; advisory board honorarium fees from Amgen and Leo Pharma; speaker fee from Boehringer Ingelheim; advisory board, speaker honorarium, and patients’ fees from Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck-EMD; advisory board and speaker honorarium fees from Incyte and Pierre Fabre; advisory board honorarium and patients’ fees from MSD; steering committee honorarium fees from 4SC; advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Array; and advisory board and patients’ fees from Philogen. AH—institutional grants, speaker’s honoraria, and consultancy fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Roche, and Novartis; institutional grants and consultancy fees from Merck Serono, Philogen, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and consultancy fees from OncoSec. ES, JB, S-YY, SL, ZC, EO, C-IC, VM, IL, MGF—employees of and shareholders in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. MS—employee and shareholder in Sanofi. MRM—honoraria and travel expenses from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Novartis, Genentech, Eli Lilly, and Sun Pharma; and institutional research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Genentech, and Eli Lilly., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Patients receiving novel treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI or immunotherapy) to treat their cancer require comprehensive information so they know what to expect and to encourage the identification and reporting of possible side-effects. Videos using patient stories can be reassuring and an effective method for conveying health information., Objective: The objective of this study was to use a co-design process to develop video resources about immunotherapy to identify a) the key informational and supportive care needs of patients and family carers and b) topics clinicians recommended be addressed during pre-treatment nurse-led education., Patient Involvement: Experience Based Co-design (EBCD) provided the framework for video development, to facilitate patient and carer involvement in every stage of research design and implementation, and video design and development., Methods: Data were collected and used in four stages: 1) qualitative interviews, 2) co-design workshop, 3) filming plan and 4) feedback and editing., Results: Thirty-five individuals contributed to the development of a suite of five videos called "Immunotherapy: What to Expect". Videos covered general treatment information, preparation for infusion, potential side-effects, balancing lifestyle with treatment and seeking support. Video run time ranges from 6 to 15 min., Discussion: The EBCD process ensured that videos were developed to meet patient and carer identified needs associated with commencing and managing ICI therapy. The structure of EBCD in facilitating patient and carer involvement throughout the research and video development process ensured transparency throughout the project, and continuity of message, scope and outcomes., Practical Value: EBCD is a useful framework for developing patient-centred health resources. The videos developed are now available for patients and carers via YouTube, and provide education and support tailored to this groups' needs regarding ICI therapy for cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Elevated platelet count is associated with poor survival in certain solid cancers, including lung cancer. In addition, experimental transplantation of cancer cell lines has uncovered a role for platelets in blood-borne metastasis. These studies, however, do not account for heterogeneity between lung cancer subtypes. Subsequently, the role of platelets in the major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC)) is not fully understood. We utilised an autochthonous Kras LSL-G12D/+ ;p53 flox/flox mouse model of lung ADC together with genetic models of thrombocytopenia to interrogate the role of platelets in lung cancer growth and progression. While thrombocytopenia failed to impact primary tumour growth, in experimental metastatic models however, thrombocytopenic mice displayed significantly extended survival. Utilising a novel thrombocytopenic immunocompromised mouse, the importance of platelets in metastatic dissemination was confirmed with human KRAS-mutant ADC cell lines. Finally, retrospective analysis of a NSCLC patient cohort revealed thrombocytosis was predictive of poor survival in ADC patients with metastatic disease. Interestingly, this association was not apparent in SqCC patients. Overall, these data highlight the possibility of patient stratification using thrombocytosis as a biomarker, and indicates opportunities for potential novel treatment strategies that combine anti-platelet and lung cancer therapies.

We previously showed in human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) that the presence of intratumoral (IT) PD-L1 + immune cells (ICs) or CD8 + infiltrating ICs are of prognostic value. Here we report the prognostic significance of these immune biomarkers in an independent validation cohort of 177 HPV+OPSCC patients. IT and stromal (S) localisation of PD-L1 + and CD8 + ICs were scored. High abundance (≥5%) of PD-L1 + IT ICs was found in 51/167 patients (30.5%) and was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.91; P = 0. 012) validating our previous results. High abundance (≥30%) of CD8 + IT or S ICs, found in 77/167 patients (46.1%) provided a HR of 0.45 for OS however the confidence interval was wide (95% CI 0.16-1.25, p = 0.105). Multiplex immunohistochemistry revealed CD68 + macrophages and CD3 + CD8 + T cells to be the most common ICs expressing PD-L1. Gene expression analysis showed tumors with high abundance of PD-L1 + IT ICs exhibit gene signatures associated with responses to PD1 or PD-L1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and atezolizumab. These data support the role of immune biomarkers such as PD-L1 + ICs to identify subgroups of HPV+OPSCC patients with an excellent outcome that may be suitable for trials evaluating de-intensification of therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors make the following declaration of competing interests, all outside the submitted work: RY - institutional research funding, Roche; SP - advisory boards, MSD, Merck; honoraria, Celgene; DU - lecture fees, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); travel fees and lecture fees, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); travel fees and lecture fees, Roche; CC - advisory boards, MSD (no honorarium); travel, accommodations and expenses, Pfizer, MSD; PN – honoraria, BMS; institutional research funding, BMS, Roche Genentech, Celgene-Juno, Advaxis, Compugen and Allergan; DR - institutional research funding, MSD, Merck, BMS, GSK, Roche, Regeneron, Amgen; Travel, MSD; advisory boards/trial steering committees (all uncompensated), MSD, Merck, BMS, GSK, Regeneron, Merck; BS – honoraria, BMS, AstraZeneca (Inst); consulting or advisory role, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Genentech, Eisai; institutional research funding, Pfizer, Roche; royalties from Veristrat (Biodesix); UpToDate; travel, accommodation and expenses, AstraZeneca, Roche, Merck, BMS, Novartis. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: There has been evidence of an association between patient outcomes and the number of surgeries performed at a hospital. To our knowledge, there are no Australian data on hospital cancer surgery volumes and patient outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between hospital non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery volume and patient outcomes in Victoria., Materials and Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis of NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 were identified in the Victorian Cancer Registry (n = 15,369), 3,420 (22%) of whom had lung cancer surgery. Primary outcome was death within 90 days of surgery and secondary outcomes included overall survival, use of postoperative ventilation and ≥24hours spent in ICU. Hospital volume was measured as the average number of lung surgeries performed per year, with quartiles Q1: 1-17, Q2: 18-34, Q3: 35-58 and Q4: 59 + ., Results: 57% (1,941/3,420) lung cancer patients underwent lobectomy, 38% (1,299/3,420) sub-lobar resection and 5% (180/3,420) pneumonectomy. The overall 90-day mortality after lung surgery was 3.5%, and was 2.6% and 4.5% for patients undergoing lobectomy and sub-lobar resection respectively. There was no difference in 90-day mortality and overall survival between low- and high-volume centres regardless of procedure. Patients operated on in lower volume centres had more admissions to ICU ≥24hours (Q1. 55% vs. Q4. 11%, p-trend <0.001). A higher proportion of patients attending private hospitals (19%) had an ASA score of 4 compared with patients attending a public hospital (9%)., Conclusion: We observed no evidence of survival differences between lung cancer patients attending low- and high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery. A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24hours in lower volume centres and there are a higher proportion of patients with an ASA score of 4 in private hospitals compared to public hospitals., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: No systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. This cancer may be responsive to immune therapy, because the mutation burden of the tumor is high and the disease risk is strongly associated with immunosuppression. In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab, a deep and durable response was observed in a patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma., Methods: We report the results of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab for expansion cohorts of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, as well as the results of the pivotal phase 2 study for a cohort of patients with metastatic disease (metastatic-disease cohort). In both studies, the patients received an intravenous dose of cemiplimab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks and were assessed for a response every 8 weeks. In the phase 2 study, the primary end point was the response rate, as assessed by independent central review., Results: In the expansion cohorts of the phase 1 study, a response to cemiplimab was observed in 13 of 26 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30 to 70). In the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study, a response was observed in 28 of 59 patients (47%; 95% CI, 34 to 61). The median follow-up was 7.9 months in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study. Among the 28 patients who had a response, the duration of response exceeded 6 months in 57%, and 82% continued to have a response and to receive cemiplimab at the time of data cutoff. Adverse events that occurred in at least 15% of the patients in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, constipation, and rash; 7% of the patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event., Conclusions: Among patients with advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, cemiplimab induced a response in approximately half the patients and was associated with adverse events that usually occur with immune checkpoint inhibitors. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02383212 and NCT02760498 .).

Background: Globally, racial and ethnic disparities exist in treatments and outcomes for cancer patients. In Australia, there are few published data related to cancer patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds., Aim: To explore disparities in adjuvant chemotherapy utilisation in cancer patients from CALD groups., Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who were recommended adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer or early stage colorectal cancer between July 2011 and October 2014 was performed. Rates of adjuvant chemotherapy uptake were analysed between those who identified English as their first-preferred language, versus those who did not, as well as between patients who were born in a country where English is the main language (non-CALD), versus those born in a country where English is not the main language (CALD)., Results: Two hundred and eleven patients were identified. One hundred and forty-three (67.7%) patients had early stage breast cancer and 68 (32.2%) patients had early stage colorectal cancer. No difference was detected in the acceptance of adjuvant chemotherapy between non-CALD (80.9%) and CALD patients (81.3%, P = 0.984) or between patients who identified English as their first-preferred language (80.8%) and those who did not (81.8%, P = 0.870). There was no difference in the rate of chemotherapy completion, with 75.6% completion in the non-English-speaking group and 81.1% in the English-speaking group (P = 0.426)., Conclusion: No difference was observed in adjuvant chemotherapy utilisation in patients who identified English as their first-preferred language compared to those who did not, as well as between non-CALD and CALD groups. This is the first study to assess these differences in Australia., (© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Purpose of Review: The review will highlight recent advances in development of ALK-TKIs and management of patients with ALK-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer., Recent Findings: There has been rapid progress in the use of targeted therapies for ALK-positive NSCLC. Since the discovery, development and approval of crizotinib in 2011, three second-generation ALK-TKIs, ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib have been approved by the FDA. A range of newer generation ALK inhibitors with improved potency against ALK and against mutations that confer resistance to crizotinib are in clinical development., Summary: Our review will discuss the recent phase III data with ceritinib and alectinib as well as clinical trials with other ALK inhibitors. We will also address two important issues in the management of ALK-positive NSCLC, prevention and treatment of brain metastases and management of emergent ALK-TKI resistance mechanisms.