1. Weight gain among children under five with severe malnutrition in therapeutic feeding programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysisResearch in context
- Author
-
Grace O'Donovan, Daniel Allen, Thandile Nkosi-Gondwe, Kenneth Anujuo, Mubarek Abera, Amir Kirolos, Laurentya Olga, Debbie Thompson, Kimberley McKenzie, Elizabeth Wimborne, Tim J. Cole, Albert Koulman, Natasha Lelijveld, Amelia C. Crampin, Charles Opondo, Marko Kerac, Suvi T. Kangas, Gemechu Ameya, and Asha Badaloo
- Subjects
Severe malnutrition ,Weight gain ,Therapeutic feeding programmes ,Child health ,Catch-up growth ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Summary: Background: Globally, some 45 million children under five years of age are wasted (low weight-for-height). Although 2023 World Health Organisation guidelines on their care did not aim to identify optimal weight gain, they did mention 5–10 g/kg/day as a target, which is a change from prior guidelines that recommended 10–15 g/kg/day, when inpatient-only care was the norm. We aimed to inform future policy/programming on weight gain targets. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, Global Health and Medline. The final search was on 23/02/2024. Papers were included if they reported weight gain of children aged 6–59 months with severe malnutrition during inpatient (facility-based), outpatient (home-based), and hybrid treatment (initially inpatient and progressing to outpatient treatment). Summary data were extracted, and quality was assessed using a NICE Quality Appraisal Checklist. Our primary outcome was mean rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) during treatment. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis to describe pooled mean weight gain by programme type. Meta-regression investigated potential associations of weight gain with length of stay and programme outcomes. We registered the study on PROSPERO (CRD42023266472). Findings: Our search yielded 3173 papers. We reviewed 321 full texts, identifying 126 eligible papers. Of these, 104 papers, including some 240,650 participants, reported weight gain as g/kg/day and were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of weight gain was 8.8 g/kg/day (95% CI: 7.6, 9.9; I2 = 97.8%) across 18 inpatient programmes, 3.4 g/kg/day (95% CI: 2.0, 4.7; I2 = 99.4%) across 12 hybrid programmes, and 3.9 g/kg/day (95% CI: 3.4, 4.4; I2 = 99.7%) across 60 outpatient programmes. We found inconsistent evidence of an association between slower weight gain and higher mortality: there was weak evidence of association after adjusting for programme type (coefficient = −0.4; 95% CI: −0.7, −0.02; p = 0.04; n = 118 programmes). There was high heterogeneity between studies. Details of weight gain calculation methods varied. We found no evidence for publication bias when accounting for programme type (Egger's test p-value = 0.2). Interpretation: Weight gain in outpatient programmes was markedly slower than in inpatient treatment. Clearer reporting of weight gain and a better understanding of the sequelae of faster/slower recovery is important to set future weight gain targets. Our results set an important baseline for current programmes to benchmark against. Funding: Medical Research Council/Global Challenges Research Fund, grant number: MR/V000802/1.
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF