Search

BACKGROUND: Information on genetic alterations, notably EGFR mutations, is important for guiding non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis represents a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for analyzing mutation status, but its clinical value may vary across disease stages. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical correlates of ctDNA and tissue/plasma-based EGFR mutation (EGFRm) status across all NSCLC stages. METHODS: Ninety patients were analyzed, representing three cohorts: newly-diagnosed early-stage, advanced-stage, and recurrent NSCLC. Relationships among clinical/surgical parameters, ctDNA, EGFRm status, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Plasma/tissue EGFRm concordance was lower in early-stage (58.6%) than in advanced-stage patients (87.5%). In early-stage patients, ctDNA levels were variable and not significantly associated with clinical/surgical parameters. In advanced-stage patients, time to EGFR-TKI treatment failure (TTF), but not overall survival (OS), was significantly longer in EGFRm-positive vs. EGFRm-negative patients. In patients with recurrent disease, 40% of plasma samples were EGFRT790M-positive at recurrence. In T790M-positive patients, we noted slight trends toward longer OS with vs. without osimertinib treatment and longer OS and TTF with second-line vs. later-line osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Our results affirm the use of ctDNA testing in advanced-stage and recurrent NSCLC. Further studies on osimertinib as early-line therapy, clinical correlates and the utility of plasma-based testing in early-stage NSCLC are warranted.

Introduction: Dacomitinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI). Recent results from ARCHER 1050, the first randomized, open-label, Phase 3 tr...

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Unfortunately, most patients quickly develop an acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. However, the effects of NSCLC harboring EGFR-T790M mutation on aggressive NSCLC phenotypes is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the extracellular vesicles (EVs) involvement in promoting the aggressiveness of NSCLC cells.EVs were isolated from the culture media of TKI-sensitive (HCC827) and TKI-resistant (H1975) NSCLC cells using ultracentrifugation. Cell viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion were examined following incubation with indicated EVs.HCC827 and H1975 cells showed time-dependent uptake of PKH67 dye labeled EVs. Incubation of EVs derived from H1975 cells (EV-H1975) did not alter the TKI sensitivity of HCC827 cells. Interestingly, EV-H1975 significantly increased HCC827 cells proliferation, invasion, and migration. By a phospho-kinase array, EV-H1975 increased phosphorylation of several proteins related to cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, including FAK, AKT, and ERK1/2, in HCC827 cells.EGFR-T790M NSCLC cells promote TKI-sensitive NSCLC cell aggressiveness, at least partially, through mechanisms associated with EVs.

As the availability of new economic evaluations (EE) on adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) with HER2-positive since last search and other EEs missed warrant a more extensive review, this study aimed to systematically review EEs of adjuvant trastuzumab compared with chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive EBC. The search was performed in February 2019 using MEDLINE and Scopus. Reviewers independently selected studies based on eligibility criteria, extracted data, assessed quality of reporting, and appraised quality of data sources. 22 studies were included which were from high-income (HICs) and upper-middle income countries (UMICs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from HICs were within their cost-effectiveness thresholds and ranged from 6,018 to 78,929 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. ICERs from UMICs mostly exceeded their thresholds ranging from 3,526 to 174,901 USD per QALY gained. Evidence shows cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab for HER2-positive EBC in HICs. There were no methodological variations. The extent and adequacy of reporting were high. The quality of data sources was moderate to high. The quality of future EEs can be improved by enhancing the reporting quality, by using context-based data and real-world efficacy data, which would impact cost-effectiveness.

Genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters may affect irinotecan toxicity. Although genetic polymorphisms have been shown to influence the irinotecan toxicity, data are limited in Thai population. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the allele and genotype frequencies and the relationship between CYP3A4/5, DPYD, UGT1A1, ABCB1, and ABCC2 genetic variations and irinotecan-induced toxicity in Thai colorectal cancer patients. One hundred and thirty-two patients were genotyped, and the effect of genetic variations on irinotecan-induced toxicity was assessed in 66 patients who received irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Allele frequencies of ABCB1 c.1236C > T, ABCB1 c.3435C > T, ABCC2 c.3972C > T, ABCG2 c.421C > A, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*18, CYP3A5*3, DPYD*5, UGT1A1*28, and UGT1A1*6 were 0.67, 0.43, 0.23, 0.27, 0.01, 0.02, 0.64, 0.19, 0.16, and 0.09, respectively. DPYD*2A and DPYD c.1774C > T variants were not detected in our study population. The ABCC2 c.3972C > T was significantly associated with grade 1–4 neutropenia (P UGT1A1*28 and *6 were significantly associated with severe neutropenia at the first (P UG1A1*28 and *6 had significantly lower absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir at first (P P = 0.001) cycles. This finding suggests that UGT1A1*28, *6, and ABCC2 c.3972C > T might be an important predictor for irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia.

Stage III NSCLC represents a heterogeneous disease for which optimal treatment continues to pose a clinical challenge. Recent changes in the American Joint Commission on Cancer staging to the eighth edition has led to a shift in TNM stage grouping and redefined the subcategories (IIIA-C) in stage III NSCLC for better prognostication. Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy has remained standard-of-care for stage III NSCLC for almost 2 decades, contemporary considerations include the impact of different molecular subsets of NSCLC, and the roles of tyrosine kinase inhibitors post-definitive therapy and of immune checkpoint inhibitors following chemoradiotherapy. With rapid evolution of diagnostic algorithms and expanding treatment options, the need for interdisciplinary input involving multiple specialists (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists and thoracic surgeons) has become increasingly important. The unique demographics of Asian NSCLC pose further challenges when applying clinical trial data into clinical practice. This includes differences in smoking rates, prevalence of oncogenic driver mutations, and access to health care resources including molecular testing, prompting the need for critical review of existing data and identification of current gaps. In this expert consensus statement by the Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group, an interdisciplinary group of experts representing Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Mainland China was convened. Standard clinical practices for stage III NSCLC across different Asian countries were discussed from initial diagnosis and staging through to multi-modality approaches including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, with many oncogenic driver mutations, including de novo mutations in the Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition (MET) gene (specifically in Exon 14 [ex14]), that lead to tumourigenesis. Acquired alterations in the MET gene, specifically MET amplification is also associated with the development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although MET has become an actionable biomarker with the availability of MET-specific inhibitors in selected countries, there is differential accessibility to diagnostic platforms and targeted therapies across countries in Asia-Pacific (APAC). The Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG), an interdisciplinary group of experts from Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Mainland China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam, discussed testing for MET alterations and considerations for using MET-specific inhibitors at a consensus meeting in January 2022, and in subsequent offline consultation. Consensus recommendations are provided by the ATORG group to address the unmet need for standardised approaches to diagnosing MET alterations in NSCLC and for using these therapies. MET inhibitors may be considered for first-line or second or subsequent lines of treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC harbouring MET ex14 skipping mutations; MET ex14 testing is preferred within multi-gene panels for detecting targetable driver mutations in NSCLC. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and MET amplification leading to EGFR TKI resistance, enrolment in combination trials of EGFR TKIs and MET inhibitors is encouraged.

Most published guidelines for genomic biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reflect the disease epidemiology and treatments readily available in Europe and North America. However, 60% of annual global NSCLC cases occur in Asia, where patient characteristics, tumor molecular profiles, and treatments vary greatly from the Western world. For example, mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occur at a higher prevalence in Asia than in other world regions. Although medical associations such as IASLC, ESMO, and ASCO have described principles for tumor genomic biomarker testing in NSCLC, there is a need for recommendations specific for Asia. This report provides consensus recommendations for NSCLC biomarker testing from Asian lung cancer experts, for clinicians working in Asia to improve patient care. These recommendations are divided into non-metastatic and metastatic forms of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Biomarker testing approaches for actionable genetic alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and others are discussed. Owing to the higher prevalence of EGFR mutations in Asia, the experts emphasized the need for EGFR testing to include not just common mutations (exon 19 deletionsL858R substitutions) but also other uncommon EGFR mutations. In addition to the assessment of biomarkers in tumor tissue, the role of assessing tumor biomarkers by liquid biopsy are also discussed.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that specifically targets the T790M mutation in cancer.Unfortunately, most non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop osimertinib resistance. Currently, the molecular biomarkers for monitoring osimertinib resistance are not available. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the profile of exosomal miRNA in the plasma of osimertinib-resistant NSCLC patients. METHODS: Plasma exosomal miRNA profiles of 8 NSCLC patients were analyzed by next-generation sequencing at osimertinib-sensitive and osimertinib-resistance stage.The expression of dysregulated exosomal miRNAs was validated and confirmed in another cohort of 19 NSCLC patients by qPCR The relationship between exosomal miRNA upregulation and clinical prognosis, survival analysis was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: In osimertinib-resistant NSCLC patients, 10 exosomal miRNAs were significantly dysregulated compared to baseline. Upregulation of all 10 candidate exosomal miRNAs tended to correlate with increased latency to treatment failure and improved overall survival. Among them, 4 exosomal miRNAs, miR-323-3p, miR-1468-3p, miR-5189-3p and miR-6513-5p were essentially upregulated and show the potential to be markers for the discrimination of osimertinib-resistance from osimertinib-sensitive NSCLC patients with high accuracy (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential role of these exosomal miRNAs as molecular biomarkers for the detection of osimertinib resistance.

9135 Background: Bronchial carcinoid (BC) is often categorized into multifocal (MBC) or solitary (SBC). MBC, excluding tumorlet and diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, is considered a relatively uncommon subgroup of BC, with much of the MBC literature stemming from case reports/small series. Our study analyzes MBC among a large cohort of 569 patients with BC and argues for change to the current clinical understanding of MBC. We suggest using the term bronchial neuroendocrine tumor (bNET) to more accurately represent its cells of origin and move away from “carcinoid” (historically meaning “carcinoma-like”) and the outdated associated connotation that carcinoids all have a similar, benign clinical and biological behavior. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Epidemiology and Genetics of Lung Cancer Database with Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed 569 patients with bNET (204 males, 365 females) presenting to Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1997-12/2012. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate factors affecting overall survival. Results: 80 patients (of 569, 14.1%) were diagnosed with multifocal (MbNET) and 489 with solitary (SbNET). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests found that older age, female gender, never having smoked cigarettes, and tumorlets were associated with MbNET diagnosis. Family lung cancer history, histopathologic grading (pathology: typical vs. atypical), Ki67, and presence of syndromes (carcinoid, Cushing, and MEN1 syndromes) were similar between MbNET and SbNET groups. Most MbNET cases were stage III-IV at the time of diagnosis, while the majority of SbNET cases were stage I. 5-year OS (83%) and 5-year PFS (75%) of MbNET patients were higher than those of their SbNET counterparts (74% and 68%, respectively). Metastasis status was an independent prognostic factor of poor OS in SbNET (P

Genetic alteration and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression have been revealed to be associated with various subtypes of pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC). The present study aimed to explore the association between histological subtypes and genetic alterations and PD-L1 expression. A total of 375 cases of pulmonary ADC were included. Genetic alterations were determined using next generation sequencing (NGS) in 136 cases. PD-L1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (based on clone 22C3) in the remaining 239 cases. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) were detected in 76 (55.8%) cases associated with the papillary subtype (P=0.038). Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS) were present in 46 (33.8%) cases associated with the lepidic subtype (P

IntroductionThe mainstay systemic treatment for non-oncogenic addictive advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer is chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic agents are additive compounds that enhance disease control and lead to improvement of overall survival benefit. Recently PD-(L)1 blockage, a checkpoint inhibitor, has been adopted as another line of treatment. A sequential strategy to enhance the efficacy of combination docetaxel and nintedanib after immunotherapy, correlated with genomic mutation, has been explored.MethodA retrospective cohort study of 56 patients from 8 centers in Thailand who received combination docetaxel and nintedanib via the Thai nintedanib Named Patient Use program was conducted. Demographic characteristics, treatment details, and treatment responses were retrieved from medical records.ResultsThe majority of patients were male (62.5%) with adenocarcinoma subtype (88%). Thirty-five percent had sensitizing EGFR mutation. Combination docetaxel and nintedanib was given as second to fourth line of treatment. Median PFS of docetaxel/nintedanib was 5.6 months [95% CI 4.8-6.9]. Median OS of the entire cohort was 22.5 months [95% CI 20.2-31.1]. Among them, only four patients received this combination after immunotherapy which limited the validity of efficacy analysis. Median PFS of those four patients was 7.9 months [range 5.2-9.1] which was slightly higher than the remaining cohort (median PFS 4.5 months, 95% CI: 4.0-6.0, p-value 0.09). Among the adenocarcinoma subtype, a relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of more than 6 months was solely indicated as a benefit of combination docetaxel/nintedanib treatment compared to the relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of less than 6 months by multivariate HR of PFS 0.32 [95% CI: 0.14-0.68, p-value 0.003].ConclusionCombination docetaxel and nintedanib provided more benefit in relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of more than 6 months in advanced stage adenocarcinoma lung cancer. Neither EGFR nor ALK alteration influenced the outcome of treatment.

Objective: BIM is a modulator of apoptosis that is triggered by EGFR-TKIs. This study evaluated the role of BIM deletion and its expression as predictor of EGFR-TKI treatment outcome. Methods: The medical record of 185 EGFR-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with/ without EGFR-TKI treatment between 9/2012 and 12/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. BIM deletion polymorphism and expression were tested by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Survival outcomes in EGFR-TKI-treated patients were analyzed according to treatment sequence and EGFR mutation. The correlation between BIM deletion polymorphism, expression, response rate (as a function of EGFR-TKI treatment) and schedule was also explored. Result: EGFR-TKIs were administered to 139 (75.1%) of the 185 patients: as the first-line in 52 (37.4%) patients and as later-line treatment in 87 (62.6%) patients. Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly longer in EGFR-TKIs treated patients (28.9 vs. 7.4 months, P

Introduction Lorlatinib, a next-generation central nervous system–penetrant ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved to treat TKI-refractory ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC based on results from a phase 2 study. Methods A real-world analysis was performed on ALK+ or ROS1-positive (ROS1+) patients with NSCLC enrolled in lorlatinib early or expanded access programs in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United States. Results A total of 95 patients with NSCLC (76 ALK+ and 19 ROS1+) were analyzed. Among ALK+ patients treated with less than two previous TKIs, two or more previous TKIs, and three or more previous TKIs, the objective response rates (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 42% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26–59; n = 38) and not reached (NR) (95% CI: 4.5–NR; n = 45), 35% (95% CI: 22–49; n = 55) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 4.5–NR; n = 66), and 18% (95% CI: 4–43; n = 17) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.5–11.6; n = 21), respectively. The ORRs and mPFSs were 13% (95% CI: 0–53; n = 8) and 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.3–NR; n = 9) for patients treated with one second-generation ALK TKI as the only ALK TKI received. For ROS1+ patients, ORRs and mPFSs were 41% (95% CI: 18–67; n = 17) and 11.9 months (95% CI: 6.4–NR; n = 19). The intracranial ORRs were 35% (95% CI: 22–49) and 55% (95% CI: 23–83) for 52 ALK+ and 11 ROS1+ patients. mPFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 1.0–NR; n = 13) for patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. No new safety signals were noted. Conclusion Lorlatinib exhibited meaningful activity in TKI-refractory ALK+ or ROS1+ patients with NSCLC enrolled in early or expanded access programs.

Purpose We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.

N Trachu,1,2 E Sirachainan,3 N Larbcharoensub,4 W Rattanadech,3 S Detarkom,3 N Monnamo,1 K Kamprerasart,4 D MunTham,5 C Sukasem,6,7 T Reungwetwattana3 1Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, 2Molecular Medicine Program, Multidisciplinary Unit, Faculty of Science, 3Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, 4Division of Anatomical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 5Section for Mathematic, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 6Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, 7Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Abstract: This study explores genomic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) tissues in Thai patients. We identified and reviewed the records of patients who had been diagnosed with CCC and for whom sufficient tumor samples for DNA and RNA extraction were available in our database. The specimens were explored for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations and ROS1 translocation in 81 samples. Immunohistochemistry staining for HER2, ALK, and Ki-67 expression was tested in 74 samples. Prevalence of EGFR, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations in this study was 21%, 12%, and 16%, respectively. No BRAF V600 mutation or ROS1 translocation was found. Patients with T790M mutation had a significantly longer overall survival (18.84months) than those with the other types of EGFR mutations (4.08 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.26, P=0.038) and also had a significantly lower median Ki-67 (22.5% vs 80%, P=0.025). Furthermore, patients with PIK3CA mutations had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (15.87 vs 7.01months; HR: 0.46, P=0.043). Strongly positive HER2 expression was found in only 1 patient, whereas ALK expression was not found. The presence of EGFR and/or PIK3CA mutations implies that targeted drugs may provide a feasible CCC treatment in the future. Keywords: cholangiocarcinoma, targeted therapy, gene alterations

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing andIn this trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with anThe median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P = 0.046). At 3 years, 79 of 279 patients (28%) in the osimertinib group and 26 of 277 (9%) in the comparator group were continuing to receive a trial regimen; the median exposure was 20.7 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 42% of the patients in the osimertinib group and in 47% of those in the comparator group.Among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported. In this trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R allele) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or one of two other EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily, with patients receiving these drugs combined in a single comparator group). Overall survival was a secondary end point. The median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P = 0.046). At 3 years, 79 of 279 patients (28%) in the osimertinib group and 26 of 277 (9%) in the comparator group were continuing to receive a trial regimen; the median exposure was 20.7 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 42% of the patients in the osimertinib group and in 47% of those in the comparator group. Among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, those who received osimertinib had longer overall survival than those who received a comparator EGFR-TKI. The safety profile for osimertinib was similar to that of the comparator EGFR-TKIs, despite a longer duration of exposure in the osimertinib group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125.).

e20552 Background: Recently, immunotherapy has significantly increased mPFS and mOS in unresectable stage III NSCLC whom completed concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in this setting has not been established yet. Methods: This is a retrospective study in stage III NSCLC patients in Ramathibodi hospital between year of 2013 and 2019. Clinical data of 176 patients were retrieved from electronic medical record. Only 64 patients had adequate tissue for tissue array for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of protein expression in CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PDL-1, CD163, CD 138, CD20 in stroma and tumor cells. We also performed IHC staining for Microsatellite Instability (MSI). Optimum cut point for each protein expression was performed by C-statistic. Survival analysis was performed. All statistical analysis was performed by Stata version 15. Results: Of 176 patients, majority of patient were male (63.6%), age ≥65 years (63.6%), never-smoker (40.9%), stage IIIB (44.9%) and adenocarcinoma (67.6%). EGFR-positive patients were 47.7%. Most of the patients underwent CCRT (32.4%), only 11.9% underwent trimodality treatment. Doublet-carboplatin based chemotherapy was the most common regimen (61.5%). The mOS was 2.9 years and mPFS was 1.6 years. Multivariable analysis showed stage IIIB patients, patients whom received only systemic treatment or best palliative care had significantly shorter OS. Trimodality treatment showed significantly longer OS compared to bimodality (CCRT) (HR = 0.18, P= 0.02), as well as cisplatin-based chemotherapy had significantly longer OS compared to carboplatin-based regimen (HR = 0.47, P= 0.005). Of 64 patients whom had tissue testing in our study, majority of patients had of MSI-low (81.25%), PD-L1 negative (78.13%). Regarding tumor microenvironment, patients with high protein expression of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD20 in stromal cells showed significantly longer OS, whereas MSI and PD-L1 were not significantly associated with survival outcomes. Conclusions: OS in stage III NSCLC in our population (2.9 years) is comparable with other studies (2.4 years). Trimodalities treatment significantly increased OS compared to CCRT. High protein expression of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD20 in stroma probably potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Larger cohort is needed to explore.

e16176 Background: The systemic treatment option of unresectable and advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is limited. The mainstay of treatment is gemcitabine and 5-FU based chemotherapy. Recently, there is the role of promising immunotherapy in MSI-HI CCA. This research aims to study molecular alterations and tumor microenvironment in Thai CCA patients in order to explore the novel treatment and the clinical correlations. Methods: Thirty-six CCA patients in Ramathibodi Hospital between year of 2018 and 2020 with adequate tissue were enrolled. NGS by ThermoFisher (comprehensive panel) for molecular profile and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for tumor microenvironment protein expression (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD138, CD163, FOXP3), and PD-L1 were performed. Clinical data was retrieved from electronic medical record. Survival analysis, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed by Cox-regression analysis. Stata version 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Intrahepatic CCA was the most common type of CCA in our population (81%). The top 10 common mutations were TP53 (69%), KMT2D 58%), KMT2B (52%), ARID1A (50%), FAT1 (50%), NOTCH3 (44%), FANCA (42%), SMAD4 (42%), EPHA2 (39%), and ARID1B (39%). We also found the interesting targetable genes in our CCA patients, such as, KRAS (33%), MTOR (33%), HER2 (31%), EGFR (31%), FGFR2 (28%), BRCA2 (25%), PIK3CA (22%), NTRK1 (19%), BRCA1 (17%), NTRK3 (11%), and BRAF (8%). Three patients had ALK fusion gene, 1 patient had NTRK1 fusion and the other one had NTRK3 fusion gene. Twelve out of 36 patients (33%) had MSI-HI and 56% of patients had TMB ≥ 10 mutations/megabase. The clinical factors significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS) were unresectable disease, stage IV, bilirubin > 1.2, and CEA ≥ 22.5. The NF1, MTOR, HER2 mutations, and FOXP3-negative in stromal cells were significantly associated with longer OS, whereas EGFR, APC, FGFR2, and BRCA1 mutations might correlated with better OS. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the unique molecular profile of Thai CCA patients. We found high prevalence of MSI-HI and high TMB in our population, together with the promising potential of targetable genes for developing targeted therapy in the future. FOXP3 expression was probably one of potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy. Larger cohort should be explored.

A number of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have now been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), including those targeted against epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and ROS1. Despite a wealth of agents developed to target the receptor tyrosine kinase, MET, clinical outcomes have as yet been disappointing, leading to pessimism about the role of MET in the pathogenesis of NSCLC. However, in recent years, there has been a renewed interest in MET exon 14 alterations as potential drivers of lung cancer.MET exon 14 alterations, which result in increased MET protein levels due to disrupted ubiquitin-mediated degradation, occur at a prevalence of around 3% in adenocarcinomas and around 2% in other lung neoplasms, making them attractive targets for the treatment of lung cancer. At least five MET-targeted TKIs, including crizotinib, cabozantinib, capmatinib, tepotinib, and glesatinib, are being investigated clinically for patients with MET exon 14 altered-NSCLC. A further two compounds have shown activity in preclinical models. In this article, we review the current clinical and preclinical data available for these TKIs, along with a number of other potential therapeutic options, including antibodies and immunotherapy. A number of questions remain unanswered regarding the future of MET TKIs, but unfortunately, the development of resistance to targeted therapies is inevitable. Resistance is expected to arise as a result of receptor tyrosine kinase mutation or from upregulation of MET ligand expression; potential strategies to overcome resistance are proposed.

Objective: Breast cancer remains to be the globally leading female cancer. About 15% to 20% of breast cancers have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors – a more aggressive breast cancer subtype with shortened survival. In the light of new and updated trial data on trastuzumab therapy for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to update the pooling of its relative treatment effects. Methods: Systematic search was performed through Pubmed and Scopus to identify studies comparing survival outcomes and risks of heart toxicity effects of adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive EBC patients. Results: Based on the eight included studies in the review, combining trastuzumab with chemotherapy continues to show lowered death and relapse risks by one-third. The decision to initiate trastuzumab, however, needs to be prudently deliberated as two to three times more cardiotoxicity risk was shown to be associated with its use. Conclusion: Administering adjuvant trastuzumab in a weekly cycle concurrently with anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy regimen appears to be a preferable option to optimize its favorable effect in improving DFS and to prevent significantly higher risk for cardiotoxic effects.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK-positive) disease occurs in approximately 5% of all patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, with a similar incidence reported in Asian patients. This study is the first phase 3 randomised trial recruiting only Asian patients to compare alectinib with crizotinib as a first-line treatment for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with 600 mg of alectinib twice per day. This study assessed consistency of the progression-free survival benefit with the global phase 3 ALEX study.In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 21 investigational sites in China, South Korea, and Thailand, Asian patients, aged 18 years or older, with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned (2:1) to twice-daily oral alectinib (600 mg) or crizotinib (250 mg). Patients were randomly assigned via a block-stratified (block size three) randomisation procedure, done centrally via an interactive voice or web response system, with stratification by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and baseline CNS metastases. Clinical staff and the funder's drug safety and medical monitoring staff had access to treatment assignments. The independent review committee was masked to treatment assignment, and funder personnel did not have access to efficacy and safety summaries by treatment group, before the formal reporting of study results. Patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases were permitted. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The primary analysis population for efficacy was the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients. The primary analysis population for safety was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02838420.Between Aug 3, 2016, and May 16, 2017, 187 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 125 to alectinib and 62 to crizotinib. Median follow-up was 16·2 months (IQR 13·7-17·6) in the alectinib group, and 15·0 months (12·5-17·3) in the crizotinib group. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0·22, 95% CI 0·13-0·38; p0·0001; median progression-free survival not estimable vs 11·1 months). Independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was also significantly longer in the alectinib group compared with the crizotinib group (HR 0·37, 0·22-0·61; p0·0001). The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was 114 (91%) of 125 with alectinib, and 48 (77%) of 62 with crizotinib, with a longer duration of response for alectinib than crizotinib (HR 0·22, 95% CI 0·12-0·40; p0·0001). Time to CNS progression (cause-specific HR 0·14) and the percentage of patients who achieved a CNS objective response with measurable or non-measurable baseline CNS lesions were improved (32 [73%] of 44 patients treated with alectinib vs five [22%] of 23 patients treated with crizotinib). Despite longer treatment duration with alectinib than crizotinib (14·7 months vs 12·6 months, respectively), fewer patients had grade 3-5 adverse events (36 [29%] of 125 vs 30 [48%] of 62, respectively) or serious adverse events (19 [15%] of 125 vs 16 [26%] of 62, respectively).Our results align with ALEX, confirming the clinical benefit of 600 mg of alectinib twice per day as a first-line treatment for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutations.Eligible Asian patients (enrolled at Asian sites) who were at least 18 years of age (≥20 years in Japan) and had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg, orally once daily) or an SoC EGFR TKI (gefitinib, 250 mg, or erlotinib, 150 mg, orally once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, central nervous system efficacy, and safety.The median PFS was 16.5 versus 11.0 months for the osimertinib and SoC EGFR TKI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.72, p 0.0001). The overall survival data were immature (24% maturity). The objective response rates were 80% for osimertinib and 75% for an SoC EGFR TKI. The median central nervous system PFS was not calculable for the osimertinib group and was 13.8 months for the SoC EGFR TKI group (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-1.17, p = 0.118). Fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher (40% versus 48%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15% versus 21%) were reported with osimertinib versus with an SoC EGFR TKI, respectively.In this Asian population, first-line osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over an SoC EGFR TKI, with a safety profile consistent with that for the overall FLAURA study population.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon, almost universally fatal, asbestos-induced malignancy. New and effective strategies for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment are urgently needed. Herein we review the advances in MPM achieved in 2017. Whereas recent epidemiological data demonstrated that the incidence of MPM-related death continued to increase in United States between 2009 and 2015, new insight into the molecular pathogenesis and the immunological tumor microenvironment of MPM, for example, regarding the role of BRCA1 associated protein 1 and the expression programmed death receptor ligand 1, are highlighting new potential therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, there continues to be an ever-expanding number of clinical studies investigating systemic therapies for MPM. These trials are primarily focused on immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with other immunotherapies and nonimmunotherapies. In addition, other promising targeted therapies, including pegylated adenosine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which focuses on argininosuccinate synthase 1–deficient tumors, and tazemetostat, an enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit inhibitor of BRCA1 associated protein 1 gene (BAP1)-deficient tumors, are currently being explored.

Background Osimertinib is a 3rd-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR-TKI that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, and has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC CNS metastases. In the phase III FLAURA study (NCT02296125), osimertinib resulted in significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (primary endpoint; datacut off [DCO] 12 June 2017) over comparator EGFR-TKI (HR 0.46, p Methods Eligible patients (pts): ≥18 years (Japan: ≥20), treatment-naive with Ex19del/L858R EGFRm advanced NSCLC; WHO performance status 0–1. Pts with stable CNS metastases not requiring steroids for ≥2 weeks were allowed. Pts were randomised 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg once daily (qd) orally (po) or comparator EGFR-TKI (gefitinib 250 mg qd/erlotinib 150 mg qd po), stratified by mutation status (Ex19del/L858R) and race (Asian/non-Asian). Crossover was allowed for pts in the comparator EGFR-TKI arm upon central confirmation of progression and T790M positivity. Primary endpoint: PFS by RECIST v1.1, per investigator. OS was a secondary endpoint. DCO 25 June 2019. Results Globally, 556 pts were randomised to osimertinib (n = 279) or comparator EGFR-TKI (n = 277). Per study protocol, 70 (25%) pts crossed over from comparator EGFR-TKI to osimertinib. Osimertinib significantly improved OS vs comparator EGFR-TKI. All causality AEs, per investigator: osimertinib, 98% (grade ≥3, 42%); comparator EGFR-TKI, 98% (grade ≥3, 47%). AEs leading to discontinuation: osimertinib, 15%; comparator EGFR-TKI, 18%. The safety profile appears consistent with previously reported data. Table . LBA5_PR Efficacy output Osimertinib n = 279 Comparator EGFR-TKI n = 277 OS hazard ratio 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p = 0.0462 (95.05% confidence interval) Median OS, months 38.6 31.8 (95% confidence interval) (34.5, 41.8) (26.6, 36.0) Deaths, total pts (%) 155 (56) 166 (60) Median follow-up for OS in all pts, months 35.8 27.0 Median follow-up for OS in censored* pts, months 43.1 43.1 12-month survival rate, % 89 83 (95% confidence interval) (85, 92) (77, 87) 24-month survival rate, % 74 59 (95% confidence interval) (69, 79) (53, 65) 36-month survival rate, % 54 44 (95% confidence interval) (48, 60) (38, 50) OS for patients in the full analysis set was analysed using a log rank test (stratified by race and mutation type) for generation of the p-value and using the Breslow approach for handling ties. The median OS with 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Kaplan Meier technique. For statistical significance, a 2-sided p-value of less than 0.0495, as determined by the O’Brien-Fleming approach was required due the previous interim analysis.*Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Conclusions Osimertinib provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS vs comparator EGFR-TKI in first-line pts with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial identification NCT02296125. Editorial acknowledgement Natalie Griffiths, PhD, from iMed Comms, an Ashfield Company; funded by AstraZeneca. Legal entity responsible for the study AstraZeneca. Funding AstraZeneca. Disclosure S.S. Ramalingam: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Loxo, Nektar, Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Tesaro, Advaxis, Takeda. J.E. Gray: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array, Merck, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb. Y. Ohe: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Chugai, Dainippon Lilly, Ono, BMS Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, BI, Bayer, Ignyta, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho, Novartis, Kyorin, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celltrion, Kissei, Amgen, Janssen, ROXO. B.C. Cho: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD; Licensing / Royalties: Champions Oncology; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraCanVac Inc.. J. Vansteenkiste: Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Apotex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche. C. Zhou: Honoraria (self): Roche, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Hengrui and Qiru. B. Chewaskulyong: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. R. Shah: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. P. Cheema: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Novartis, Genomic Health, Pfizer. M. Tiseo: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. T. John: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Ignyta, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer. F. Imamura: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. R. Hodge: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. Y. Rukazenkov: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. J. Soria: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Astex, Clovis, GSK, GamaMabs, Lilly, MSD, Mission Therapeutics, Merus, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Symphogen, and Takeda; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AstraZeneca, Gritstone; Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. D. Planchard: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Medimmun, Sanofi-Aventis, Taiho Pharma, Novocure, Daiichi Sankyo; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim , Roche, Merck,Novartis, prIME Oncology, Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background In the phase III FLAURA study (NCT02296125), the 3rd-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib showed superior efficacy to comparator EGFR-TKIs in previously untreated EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we report results from an exploratory analysis of ctDNA for the early detection of disease progression (PD) in FLAURA. Methods Treatment-naive patients (pts) with EGFRm (ex19del/L858R) locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC (n = 556) were randomised 1:1 (osimertinib 80 mg qd: comparator [gefitinib 250 mg qd/erlotinib 150 mg qd]). Plasma samples were collected on Days 1, 8 and 15, then every 21 days for weeks (W) 3–18, then every 6W thereafter. In pts who had a plasma sample on PD and/or discontinuation, ctDNA droplet digital PCR (ddPCR; Biodesix) for EGFRm (ex19del/L858R/T790M) was performed at all available time points and C797S for post-W6 time points. C797S and T790M were the only resistance mutations assayed. ctDNA progression was defined with respect to the nadir ctDNA result and its proximity to the ddPCR detection and quantification limits. Results The ctDNA progression analysis included 122/556 (22%) pts with valid longitudinal monitoring ddPCR data and RECIST PD by DCO1 (12 June 2017). Across both arms, ctDNA progression preceded or co-occurred with PD in 80/122 (66%) pts with 2.7 months (mo) median lead time; 9.5 mo median progression-free survival (mPFS; n = 80). Acquired C797S or T790M was detected in 57/122 (47%) pts with ctDNA progression (osimertinib 4/50 [8%] C797S, comparator 53/72 [74%] T790M); median time to detection was 16.7 and 8.4 mo for the osimertinib and comparator arms, respectively, mirroring overall mPFS. In pts with ctDNA progression and PD (n = 106), acquired T790M and C797S were detected either at the same time as, or earlier than PD in 41/106 (38%) pts (osimertinib 2/39 [5%], comparator 39/67 [58%]); median lead time was 1.4 mo. Conclusions ctDNA monitoring may allow for earlier identification of pts who progress on first-line EGFR-TKI therapy and the detection of EGFR-mediated resistance mechanisms in advance of PD in EGFRm NSCLC. Future work aims to explore early detection of non-EGFR-mediated resistance. Clinical trial identification NCT02296125. Editorial acknowledgement Donna Tillotson, PhD, of iMed Comms, Macclesfield, UK, an Ashfield Company, part of UDG Healthcare plc, funded by AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publications Practice (GPP3) guidelines. Legal entity responsible for the study AstraZeneca. Funding AstraZeneca. Disclosure J.E. Gray: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda. A. Markovets: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. N. Nogami: Honoraria (self): Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD. B.C. Cho: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Dizal Pharma, MSD; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Licensing / Royalties: Champions Oncology; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Takeda; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraCanVac Inc. B. Chewaskulyong: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. M. Majem: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Hellsin; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen. N. Peled: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self): Foundation Medicine; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novellus Dx; Honoraria (self): Guardant360. K. Vishwanathan: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. A. Todd: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. Y. Rukazenkov: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. M. Johnson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. C. Barrett: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. J. Chmielecki: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. R. Hartmaier: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Nfe2l2 exon 2 ano/or exon 3 loss from work conducted at Foundation Medicine; provisional patent filed: Foundation Medicine. S.S. Ramalingam: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Celgene, Genentech, Lilly, Loxo, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (self): Tesaro.

Lung cancer continues to be a major global health problem; the disease is diagnosed in more than 1.6 million new patients each year. However, significant progress is underway in both the prevention and treatment of lung cancer. Lung cancer therapy has now emerged as a "role model" for precision cancer medicine, with several important therapeutic breakthroughs occurring during 2015. These advances have occurred primarily in the immunotherapy field and in treatments directed against tumors harboring specific oncogenic drivers. Our knowledge about molecular mechanisms for oncogene-driven tumors and about resistance to targeted therapies has increased quickly over the past year. As a result, several regulatory approvals of new agents that significantly improve survival and quality of life for patients with lung cancer who have advanced disease have occurred. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has gathered experts in different areas of lung cancer research and management to summarize the most significant scientific advancements related to prevention and therapy of lung cancer during the past year. (C) 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.