1. Results-based financing to increase uptake of skilled delivery services in The Gambia: using the 'three delays' model to interpret midline evaluation findings.
- Author
-
Ferguson, Laura, Hasan, Rifat, Boudreaux, Chantelle, Thomas, Hannah, Jallow, Mariama, Fink, Günther, The Project Implementation Committee (PIC), Phall, Modou Cheyassin, Ceesay, Abdou A., Ceesay, Ousman, Colley, Famata, Darboe, Modou L., Fofana, Malang N., Gibba, Catherine, Jallow, Bakary, Loum, Musa, Mago, Elizabeth, Njie, Lamin, Njie, Matty, and Sankareh, Alhagie
- Subjects
DELIVERY (Obstetrics) ,CHILDBIRTH ,LABOR (Obstetrics) ,PREGNANCY complications ,HIGH-risk pregnancy ,WOMEN'S health ,MATERNAL health services ,RESEARCH ,HEALTH facilities ,HEALTH services accessibility ,FOCUS groups ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,RESEARCH methodology ,REGRESSION analysis ,INTERVIEWING ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,QUALITATIVE research ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,RESEARCH funding ,PRENATAL care ,MATERNAL mortality - Abstract
Background: Delays in accessing skilled delivery services are a major contributor to high maternal mortality in resource-limited settings. In 2015, the government of The Gambia initiated a results-based financing intervention that sought to increase uptake of skilled delivery. We performed a midline evaluation to determine the impact of the intervention and explore causes of delays.Methods: A mixed methods design was used to measure changes in uptake of skilled delivery and explore underlying reasons, with communities randomly assigned to four arms: (1) community-based intervention, (2) facility-based intervention, (3) community- and facility-based intervention, and (4) control. We obtained quantitative data from household surveys conducted at baseline (n = 1423) and midline (n = 1573). Qualitative data came from semi-structured interviews (baseline n = 20; midline n = 20) and focus group discussions (baseline n = 27; midline n = 39) with a range of stakeholders. Multivariable linear regression models were estimated using pooled data from baseline and midline. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, translated and thematically analyzed.Results: No increase was found in uptake of skilled delivery services between baseline and midline. However, relative to the control group, significant increases in referral to health facilities for delivery were found in areas receiving the community-based intervention (beta = 0.078, p < 0.10) and areas receiving both the community-based and facility-based interventions (beta = 0.198, p < 0.05). There was also an increase in accompaniment to health facilities for delivery in areas receiving only community-based interventions (beta = 0.095, p < 0.05). Transportation to health facilities for delivery increased in areas with both interventions (beta = 0.102, p < 0.05). Qualitative data indicate that delays in the decision to seek institutional delivery usually occurred when women had limited knowledge of delivery indications. Delays in reaching a health facility typically occurred due to transportation-related challenges. Although health workers noted shortages in supplies and equipment, women reported being supported by staff and experiencing minimal delays in receiving skilled delivery care once at the facility.Conclusions: Focusing efforts on informing the decision to seek care and overcoming transportation barriers can reduce delays in care-seeking among pregnant women and facilitate efforts to increase uptake of skilled delivery services through results-based financing mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF