Search

Background The use of endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer, particularly aromatase inhibitor therapy has been associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture in clinical trials. We sought to validate this observation in real-world practice. Methods We used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2012. Patients were classified by use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed until 2017 for a new diagnosis of an osteoporotic fracture. A multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was adjusting for age, medical co-morbidities, medication use and duration of endocrine therapy. Results We identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor as compared to 27% with tamoxifen. Our multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture between patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor when compared with tamoxifen [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–1.23, p-value = 0.18]. The 5-year rate of osteoporotic fracture for patients treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen was 7.5% and 6.9%, respectively. A completed sensitivity analysis did observe a decreased risk of fracture associated with tamoxifen usage over time. Conclusion We could not detect a significant difference in the rate of osteoporotic fracture among patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen. Nonetheless, the risk with tamoxifen was numerically lower and significantly decreased when accounting for total duration of endocrine therapy., Highlights • Our real-world study investigated the osteoporotic fracture risk among early-stage post-menopausal breast cancer patients. • No significant difference in fracture rates was observed among patients treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. • The risk of osteoporotic fracture decreased with tamoxifen usage over time. • Bone health should be carefully monitored and optimized among breast cancer patients recieving endocrine therapy.

One year of adjuvant trastuzumab is considered the standard treatment for patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. However, a shorter duration of trastuzumab may be associated with reduced costs and side effects. Results from randomized trials with diverse non-inferiority margins comparing one year to a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab are not consistent and have not been systematically reviewed using a non-inferiority meta-analysis approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials to assess whether a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of treatment or not. The non-inferiority margin for the meta-analysis was pre-defined as the median of the margins of all the trials included. Data of 11,376 patients from 5 trials were analyzed. Non-inferiority margins in included studies varied from 1.15 to 1.53 with median of 1.29 for HR of DFS. A shorter duration of trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of therapy for DFS (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.03–1.24) but inconclusive for OS (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00–1.30). In a subgroup analysis for DFS outcome, shorter therapy was non-inferior in patients with ER positive disease (HR 1.10, 95%CI 0.95–1.28) and those with sequential therapy (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.75–1.27) and when the duration of treatment was 6 months (HR 1.09, 95%CI 0.98–1.22). Although a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to one year of therapy for DFS in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer based on our HR margin of 1.29, any benefit of a shorter duration comes at a loss of efficacy with an increase in absolute risk up to 3.9% for 5 year DFS. Whether the potential increased risk is clinically acceptable for the benefits of a shorter duration remains debatable., Highlights • Shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancer is attractive. • Inconsistent results seen from the PHARE and PERSEPHONE trials. • Meta-analysis suggests shorter duration of trastuzumab is non-inferior. • Highlights need for appropriately chosen and applied non-inferiority margin.

Purpose The association between endocrine therapy and risk of dementia remains uncertain. We investigated the association between adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer and risk of developing dementia in a real-world, population-based study. Methods We used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2012 with follow-up until 2017. Patients were classified by the use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed to estimate the unadjusted cumulative incidence of developing dementia. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was created adjusting for age, income quintile, medical co-morbidities, and duration of endocrine therapy. Results We identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor and 27% with tamoxifen. Our multivariable analysis showed a lower rate of dementia in patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor as compared to tamoxifen [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.98, p-value = .02) at a median follow-up of 5.9 years. The 5-year dementia rate among patient treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen was 7.4% and 9.2% respectively. Older age, previous history of ischemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension and history of stroke were all significantly associated with the development of dementia. Conclusion Aromatase inhibitor therapy was associated with a decreased incidence of dementia as compared to treatment with tamoxifen among post-menopausal women with early stage breast cancer. Further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up investigating the neurocognitive effects of endocrine therapy are warranted.

Female patients with breast cancer frequently develop arthralgia when treated with aromatase inhibitors (AI). Although the mechanism of AI-induced arthralgia is unknown, potential biomarkers have been identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia in a prospective cohort of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. One hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled at initiation of AI therapy with either letrozole or anastrozole. Patients completed two validated self-report questionnaires assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function at baseline, and repeated the questionnaires at two and at six months after the initiation of treatment with an AI. Germline DNA of all patients was genotyped for seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified by genetic screens and genome-wide association studies as associated with AI-induced arthralgia. More than 50% of the study group experienced arthralgia symptoms. Genetic analysis revealed that four SNPs, in CYP19A1 (rs4775936) and ESR1 (rs9322336, rs2234693, rs9340799), were associated with the development of arthralgia (adjusted P = 0.016, 0.018, 0.017, 0.047). High body mass index (BMI) was also associated with the development of arthralgia symptoms (adjusted P = 0.001). Patients prescribed letrozole were significantly more likely to develop arthralgia than patients on anastrozole (P = 0.018), and also more likely to discontinue AI therapy due to arthralgia. The CYP19A1 (rs4775936) SNP was significantly associated with discontinuation of therapy due to intolerable arthralgia. Our results suggested that BMI and AI drug (letrozole versus anastrozole) were clinical predictors of arthralgia, while genetic variants rs4775936, rs9322336, rs2234693, and rs9340799 were genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia. Significantly, rs4775936 was also a predictor of discontinuation of therapy.

Background: TreatER+ight is the 1st prospective observational study in Canadian HR+ HER2- advanced breast cancer patients currently receiving endocrine therapy (ET) alone or in combination with targeted therapy (TT) (NCT02753686). Methods: This exploratory analysis displays real-world evidence on baseline demographics, treatment patterns, sequencing, and method of access to therapy. More specifically this abstract focuses on treatment decisions around CDK4/6-based therapy at various lines of treatment. At data cut-off of April 1st 2019, 305 patients were enrolled from 24 sites since Mar'16 with 113 patients receiving CDK4/6is at baseline. 300 patients were evaluable for treatment analysis. Results: Baseline CharacteristicsOverall (n=305)CDK4/6 + ET (n=113)Median age, years (range)67 (23 - 92)67 (23-87)ECOG 0,1,2*95, 104, 1941,32, 4Post-menopausal*21468Pre/peri-menopausal*6530Therapy by disease severity at baselineVisceral (n = 196)Bone only (n = 101)CDK4/6 + ET7338ET5941mTOR + ET6421PI3K + ET01Current therapy on the study Overall (N = 300)CDK4/6 + ET113ET100mTOR + ET86 PI3K + ET1Current CDK therapy by line of treatmentAll CDK4/6 (N = 113)First line60Second line38Third line13 Fourth line2Overall treatment patterns by lineFirst-Line (n = 154)Second-Line (n = 111)Third-Line (n = 64)CDK 4/6i + ET855317ET582711mTOR + Exemestane82114Chemo31022Median duration on therapy in months1L2LCDK4/6 + ET8.87 (median follow-up of 9.6 mos)8.77 (median follow-up of 11.6 mos)*Data missing for some patients at the time of this analysis Conclusions: The majority of patients enrolled (66.6%) are receiving combination therapy with the most common treatment being a CDK4/6-based therapy (56.5%). Of the patients receiving CDK4/6 at baseline a majority are receiving this therapy in the 1L (53.1%) and 2L (33.6%), with the median duration on therapy of respectively 8.87 and 8.77 months. For patients receiving CDK4/6 therapy in 1L, the most common 2L treatment is either endocrine therapy single agent and in certain parts of the country everolimus + exemestane. Further sequencing information will be analyzed and shared for this abstract. Citation Format: Catherine Doyle, Nadia Califaretti, Cristiano Ferrario, Nayyer Iqbal, John Hilton, Theodore Vandenberg, Mihaela Mates, Vivian Glenns, Swati Kulkarni, Puneet Bains, Sina Haftchenary, Sabrina Perri, Stephen Chia. Exploratory analysis of TreatER+ight; a Canadian prospective real-world observational study in HR+ advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-36.

Summary Background Whole breast irradiation delivered once per day over 3–5 weeks after breast conserving surgery reduces local recurrence with good cosmetic results. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered over 1 week to the tumour bed was developed to provide a more convenient treatment. In this trial, we investigated if external beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation. Methods We did this multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in 33 cancer centres in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Women aged 40 years or older with ductal carcinoma in situ or node-negative breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either external beam APBI (38·5 Gy in ten fractions delivered twice per day over 5–8 days) or whole breast irradiation (42·5 Gy in 16 fractions once per day over 21 days, or 50 Gy in 25 fractions once per day over 35 days). Patients and clinicans were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed on the basis of an expected 5 year IBTR rate of 1·5% in the whole breast irradiation group with 85% power to exclude a 1·5% increase in the APBI group; non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 90% CI for the IBTR hazard ratio (HR) was less than 2·02. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00282035 . Findings Between Feb 7, 2006, and July 15, 2011, we enrolled 2135 women. 1070 were randomly assigned to receive APBI and 1065 were assigned to receive whole breast irradiation. Six patients in the APBI group withdrew before treatment, four more did not receive radiotherapy, and 16 patients received whole breast irradiation. In the whole breast irradiation group, 16 patients withdrew, and two more did not receive radiotherapy. In the APBI group, a further 14 patients were lost to follow-up and nine patients withdrew during the follow-up period. In the whole breast irradiation group, 20 patients were lost to follow-up and 35 withdrew during follow-up. Median follow-up was 8·6 years (IQR 7·3–9·9). The 8-year cumulative rates of IBTR were 3·0% (95% CI 1·9–4·0) in the APBI group and 2·8% (1·8–3·9) in the whole breast irradiation group. The HR for APBI versus whole breast radiation was 1·27 (90% CI 0·84–1·91). Acute radiation toxicity (grade ≥2, within 3 months of radiotherapy start) occurred less frequently in patients treated with APBI (300 [28%] of 1070 patients) than whole breast irradiation (484 [45%] of 1065 patients, p Interpretation External beam APBI was non-inferior to whole breast irradiation in preventing IBTR. Although less acute toxicity was observed, the regimen used was associated with an increase in moderate late toxicity and adverse cosmesis, which might be related to the twice per day treatment. Other approaches, such as treatment once per day, might not adversely affect cosmesis and should be studied. Funding Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance.

Everolimus plus exemestane is approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The role of everolimus is less well defined in other breast cancer phenotypes and in combination with other drugs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to standard of care (SoC) in MBC regardless of tumor phenotype and treatment type. The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible randomized trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios for objective response rates, disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher toxicity were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses compared survival outcomes by tumor phenotype. Data from 2826 patients from eight trials were analyzed. The addition of everolimus to SoC reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.90). This did not translate into an OS benefit (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80–1.13). In addition, everolimus improved the DCR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68–0.98), whereas it increased the risk of developing grade 3 or higher toxicity. The PFS benefit was more prominent for patients with hormone receptor-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (−) disease. For the HER2 (+) subgroup, the PFS benefit was restricted to patients with hormone receptor (−) disease. Everolimus reduces the risk of disease progression in hormone receptor (+) MBC. In patients with HER2 (+) disease, the benefit is limited for those with hormone receptor (−) disease. Given the approval and use of newer drugs in MBC, clinical trials and real-world data are needed to confirm the benefit of everolimus and define the best treatment sequence strategy to adopt in that setting.

Purpose To evaluate whether concurrent neoadjuvant radiation added to standard chemotherapy could increase the pathologic complete response (pCR) to treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods and Materials This prospective phase 2 trial recruited 32 LABC patients from 2009 to 2011. Patients received neoadjuvant every-3-weekly 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m 2 ), epirubicin (100 mg/m 2 ), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m 2 ) for 3 cycles, followed by weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m 2 ) for 9 cycles. Regional radiation (45 Gy/25 plus 5.4 Gy/5) was delivered concurrently with docetaxel, then modified radical mastectomy. Patients were matched post hoc by a blinded statistician to a concurrent cohort treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and adjuvant regional radiation. Results Thirty of 32 patients completed treatment. Twenty-seven were successfully matched by propensity score to 81 control patients by age, stage, and molecular subtype. The concurrent chemoradiation produced a significant increase in pCR (14% vs 22%, P P =.186, hazard ratio 0.51; and 74% vs 89%, P =.162, hazard ratio 0.46). Toxicity included 25% of patients with grade 3 pneumonitis and 25% of patients with dermatitis, and 1 death. Conclusions Concurrent neoadjuvant radiation added to radiosensitizing chemotherapy significantly improved pCR. A prospective randomized clinical trial is warranted to exploit the improved response seen with concurrent therapy but using another radio-sensitizing taxane, to better minimize treatment-related toxicity and determine its impact on overall survival.

Purpose To make recommendations regarding the use of bisphosphonates and other bone-modifying agents as adjuvant therapy for patients with breast cancer. Methods Cancer Care Ontario and ASCO convened a Working Group and Expert Panel to develop evidence-based recommendations informed by a systematic review of the literature. Results Adjuvant bisphosphonates were found to reduce bone recurrence and improve survival in postmenopausal patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. In this guideline, postmenopausal includes patients with natural menopause or that induced by ovarian suppression or ablation. Absolute benefit is greater in patients who are at higher risk of recurrence, and almost all trials were conducted in patients who also received systemic therapy. Most studies evaluated zoledronic acid or clodronate, and data are extremely limited for other bisphosphonates. While denosumab was found to reduce fractures, long-term survival data are still required. Recommendations It is recommended that, if available, zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) or clodronate (1,600 mg/d orally) be considered as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer who are deemed candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Further research comparing different bone-modifying agents, doses, dosing intervals, and durations is required. Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal impairment should be assessed, and any pending dental or oral health problems should be dealt with prior to starting treatment. Data for adjuvant denosumab look promising but are currently insufficient to make any recommendation. Use of these agents to reduce fragility fractures in patients with low bone mineral density is beyond the scope of the guideline. Recommendations are not meant to restrict such use of bone-modifying agents in these situations. Additional information at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-adjuvant-bisphosphonates-guideline , www.asco.org/guidelineswiki , https://www.cancercareontario.ca/guidelines-advice/types-of-cancer/breast .

Background: Anastrozole depletes estrogen via aromatase inhibition and fulvestrant binds and degrades estrogen receptor. In a Phase III trial we compared the concurrent use of these agents to anastrozole alone or sequential anastrozole and fulvestrant in first-line therapy of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and demonstrated improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)-NEJM 2012. Now we report PFS and OS five years after the initial positive findings. Methods: A total of 707 patients were randomized to either 1 mg anastrozole P.O. daily (Arm 1) or to the combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant (Arm 2). Fulvestrant was administered as a loading dose of 500 mg on day 1, 250 mg on days 14, 28 and monthly thereafter. Randomization was stratified by adjuvant tamoxifen use. The primary endpoint was PFS with OS a secondary outcome. 40% patients not in visceral crisis crossed over to fulvestrant after progression on arm 1. Analysis of survival was by 2-sided stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression using intent-to-treat. Subset analyses include treatment effect by adjuvant tamoxifen exposure, initial sites of metastases and time from diagnosis. Results: There were 646 PFS events (328 and 318 for arms 1 and 2, respectively) among 694 eligible patients (345 and 349, respectively). Overall, median PFS was 13.5 months for arm 1 and 15.0 months for the arm 2 (log-rank p=0.007; HR=0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.94)). This benefit extended similarly in visceral and non-visceral subgroups. In subset analysis for Arms 1 and 2, respectively, in tamoxifen-naive women (60%, n=414), median PFS was 12.7 vs. 16.7 months (log-rank p=0.002; HR=0.73 (95% CI 0.60-0.89) while in women exposed to tamoxifen, median PFS was 13.9 vs. 13.6 months (log-rank p=0.57; HR=0.93 (95% CI 0.73-1.19)). An improved OS in the combination arm was seen, median OS 42 and 50 months in arms 1 and 2, based on 261 and 247 deaths, respectively (log-rank p=0.028; HR=0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.98)). In subset analysis in tamoxifen-naive women, median OS was 40.3 vs. 52.2 months for Arms 1 and 2, respectively (log-rank p=0.007; HR=0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.92)) while in women exposed to tamoxifen, median OS was 43.5 vs. 48.2 months (log-rank p=0.85; HR=0.97 (95% CI 0.74-1.27). Patients with initial diagnosis >10 years benefitted most from the combination (HR=0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.89)) regardless of tamoxifen exposure. Patients in Arm 1 who crossed over had post-progression survival similar to post-progression survival of Arm 2 patients. Conclusion: The addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole was associated with improved long-term PFS and OS compared to anastrozole alone, despite the use of fulvestrant at a dose lower than the approved, and despite the substantial cross over to fulvestrant after progression on anastrozole alone. The benefit was especially notable in those without recent exposure to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Ongoing translational medicine studies will further refine the need for up front fulvestrant. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00075764. Funding: NIH/NCI U10CA180888, U10CA180819 and AstraZeneca. Citation Format: Mehta RS, Barlow WE, Albain KS, Vandenberg TA, Dakhil SR, Tirumali NL, Lew DL, Hayes DF, Gralow JR, Linden HM, Livingston RB, Hortobagyi GN. A phase III randomized trial of anastrozole and fulvestrant versus anastrozole or sequential anastrozole and fulvestrant as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: Final survival outcomes of SWOG S0226 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-07.

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among post-menopausal breast cancer patients is an important survivorship care issue. We explored factors associated with endocrine therapy adherence and survival in a large real-world population-based study. We used health administrative databases to follow women (aged ≥ 66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005 to 2010. Adherence was measured by medical possession ratio (MPR) and characterized as low (

BackgroundWe previously reported prolonged progression-free survival and marginally prolonged overall survival among postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had been randomly assigned to receive the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole plus the selective estrogen-receptor down-regulator fulvestrant, as compared with anastrozole alone, as first-line therapy. We now report final survival outcomes.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients to receive either anastrozole or fulvestrant plus anastrozole. Randomization was stratified according to adjuvant tamoxifen use. Analysis of survival was performed by means of two-sided stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression. Efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups, both overall and in subgroups.ResultsOf 707 patients who had undergone randomization, 694 had data available for analysis. The combination-therapy group had 247 deaths among 349 women (71%) and a median overall survival of 49.8 months, as compared with 261 deaths among 345 women (76%) and a median overall survival of 42.0 months in the anastrozole-alone group, a significant difference (hazard ratio for death, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.98; P = 0.03 by the log-rank test). In a subgroup analysis of the two strata, overall survival among women who had not received tamoxifen previously was longer with the combination therapy than with anastrozole alone (median, 52.2 months and 40.3 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.92); among women who had received tamoxifen previously, overall survival was similar in the two groups (median, 48.2 months and 43.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.27) (P = 0.09 for interaction). The incidence of long-term toxic effects of grade 3 to 5 was similar in the two groups. Approximately 45% of the patients in the anastrozole-alone group crossed over to receive fulvestrant.ConclusionsThe addition of fulvestrant to anastrozole was associated with increased long-term survival as compared with anastrozole alone, despite substantial crossover to fulvestrant after progression during therapy with anastrozole alone. The results suggest that the benefit was particularly notable in patients without previous exposure to adjuvant endocrine therapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00075764.).

AIMS In the SWOG S0226 trial the combination of anastrozole plus fulvestrant (n = 349) was superior to anastrozole alone (n = 345) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer. Here we report a pharmacokinetic subset analysis investigating a possible drug interaction between anastrozole and fulvestrant. METHODS Post-menopausal patients with HR-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole with or without concurrent fulvestrant. Blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months, just prior to receiving the next dose of anastrozole and fulvestrant. Drug concentrations were measured via LC/MS-MS. Anastrozole concentration was compared in patients on anastrozole alone vs. patients on concomitant fulvestrant. Comparisons were made at each time point using parametric tests and over time using a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS A total of 483 anastrozole concentration measurements were included, 224 samples from 64 patients on the anastrozole alone arm and 259 from 73 patients on the combination arm. The mean anastrozole concentration in the combination arm was significantly lower than that in the anastrozole alone arm at each sample collection time (all P

521 Background: The association between anti-estrogen therapy and risk of dementia remains controversial. We performed a population-based real-world study investigating the association between endocrine therapy use and dementia. Methods: We used health administrative data collected from post-menopausal women (aged ≥66 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer and started on adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2005-2012. Patients were classified by use of either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen and followed to measure an unadjusted cumulative incidence of developing dementia. A multivariable analysis adjusting for age, income quintile, medical comorbidities, and duration of endocrine therapy was completed using a Cox-proportional hazards model. Results: We identified 12,077 patients of whom 73% were treated with an aromatase inhibitor and 27% with tamoxifen. The median age was 73 years (IQR 69-78), 64% of patients were treated with lumpectomy, and 19% received adjuvant chemotherapy. The unadjusted event rate for developing dementia was Hazard Ratio (HR)= 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.63-0.78, p-value

e12532 Background: Early Breast Cancer Trialist Collaborative Group meta-analysis suggested significant reduction in bone metastasis and breast cancer mortality among post-menopausal women diagnosed with early breast cancer when treated with an adjuvant bisphosphonate. Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline published in 2017, recommends the use of an adjuvant bisphosphonate in postmenopausal women who are candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy. Our goal was to evaluate trends and factors associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate usage since the guideline’s publication. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of postmenopausal women treated for early breast at the London Regional Cancer Program from 2017-2018. Univariate and a multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate factors potentially associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate use including age, stage, grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 receptor status and previous use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The percentage of patients offered, receiving and declining therapy was also recorded and the time interval from surgery to start of bisphosphonate therapy (< 6 months, 6-12 months or >12 months). Results: We identified 286 postmenopausal breast cancer patients, of whom 75 (28%) received adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy. In our multivariable model, cancer stage [odds ratio (OR) stage II vs. I=2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-4.74) and OR Stage III vs. I=4.94, 95% CI 1.84-13.17] and previous use of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=2.76, 95%CI 1.37-5.55) were significantly associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate use. Among 133 patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, 51% were offered adjuvant bisphosphonate and of these 81% patients accepted therapy. Among a total of 75 patients receiving adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy 19% initiated therapy within 6 months of surgery, 48% within 6-12 months of surgery, and 33% after 12 months following surgery. Conclusions: Stage and previous use of chemotherapy were significantly associated with adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy. Our study observes the potential underutilization of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and possible need to start treatment earlier in some patients. Further education and awareness of the clinical practice guidelines regarding adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy may be warranted and additional population-based study investigating treatment patterns and real-world effectiveness.

The aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole is a first-line drug in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Adherence to AI therapy, including letrozole, remains problematic due to the development of debilitating AI-induced arthralgia. Letrozole is metabolized in the liver by CYP2A6. It remains unknown if plasma letrozole levels or CYP2A6 genetic variation is associated with the development of arthralgia. We enrolled 126 female breast cancer patients initiated on letrozole therapy and prospectively collected blood samples at baseline and two follow-up time points to determine letrozole plasma concentrations and CYP2A6 genotype. At each visit, participants completed two validated questionnaires to assess the severity of arthralgia symptoms. More than half (55%) of patients experienced a significant increase in their arthralgia symptoms after initiation of treatment. The clinical variables of body mass index (P = 0.0003) and age (P = 0.0430) were negatively and positively associated with plasma letrozole concentrations, respectively. CYP2A6 genotype was significantly associated with letrozole levels (P

Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with worse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the association of metabolic, inflammatory, and tumor markers with CTCs in women with metastatic BC before commencing a new systemic therapy. Methods Ninety-six patients with newly diagnosed or progressing metastatic BC without current diabetes or use of anti-inflammatory agents were recruited from four Ontario hospitals. Women provided fasting blood for measurement of metabolic, inflammatory, and tumor markers and CTCs. CTCs were assayed within 72 hours of collection using CellSearch. Other blood was frozen at –80°C, and assays were performed in a single batch. Associations between CTC counts with study factors were evaluated using Spearman correlation, and the chi-square or Fisher exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided and P value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Results The median age was 60.5 years; 90.6% were postmenopausal. The cohort included hormone receptor–positive (87.5%), HER2–positive (15.6%), and triple-negative (10.4%) BCs. Patients were starting firstline (35.5%), second-line (26.0%), or third-or-later-line therapy (38.5%). CTC counts (per 7.5 mL of blood) ranged from 0 to 1238 (median 2); an elevated CTC count, defined as five or more CTCs, was detected in 42 (43.8%) patients. Those with liver metastases (vs not) more frequently had an elevated CTC count (59.0% vs 33.3%, P = .02). CTCs were significantly associated with C-reactive protein (R = .22, P = .02), interleukin (IL)-6 (R = .25, P = .01), IL-8 (R = .38, P = .0001), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (R = .31, P = .001), carcinoembryonic antigen (R = .31, P = .002), and cancer antigen 15-3 (R = .40, P = .0001) and inversely associated with body mass index (R = –.23, P = .02) and leptin (R = –.26, P = .01). Conclusions CTC counts were positively associated with tumor and inflammatory markers and inversely associated with some metabolic markers, potentially reflecting tumor burden and cachexia.

Low vitamin D levels have been associated with poor breast cancer outcomes in observational studies. We examined the association of vitamin D blood levels with relapse-free survival (RFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) in the MA.21 randomized clinical trial. Fasting blood was collected pre-chemotherapy in 934/2104 (44.4 %) of subjects; 25 hydroxy vitamin D was measured (radioimmunoassay, Diasorin) in one batch. Vitamin D was assessed as a transformed continuous factor, and categorically (quartiles and clinical classifications). Univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses (adjusted for treatment, stratification factors, and baseline imbalances) were performed using Cox models. Most patients were young (median 47.8 years), white (91.6 %) and premenopausal (69.4 %) with grade III (52 %), HER2 negative or missing (89.5 %), ER positive (61.9 %), T1-2 (89.4 %), N + (72.7 %) breast cancer. Compared to the full population, those with vitamin D levels were more likely to be white, PS 1 or 2, to have undergone mastectomy, and to have an ER + tumor. Mean vitamin D was 69.7 nmol/L (27.9 ng/ml) and did not vary by tumor subtype. The majority (80.5 %) had levels >50 nmol/L (20 ng/ml), considered adequate by Institute of Medicine. Continuous vitamin D was not multivariately associated with RFS, BCSS, or OS (p = 0.36, 0.26, 0.33, respectively); categorical vitamin D was also not associated with outcome. Vitamin D associations with RFS did not differ within ER/HER2 subgroups. There was no evidence that vitamin D blood level was associated with RFS, BCSS, and OS in MA.21; the majority of subjects had adequate vitamin D levels at study entry.

Purpose To update, in collaboration with Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline on the role of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in metastatic breast cancer. This focused update addressed the new data on intervals between dosing and the role of BMAs in control of bone pain. Methods A joint ASCO-CCO Update Committee conducted targeted systematic literature reviews to identify relevant studies. Results The Update Committee reviewed three phase III noninferiority trials of dosing intervals, one systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of de-escalation of BMAs, and two randomized trials of BMAs in control of pain secondary to bone metastases. Recommendations Patients with breast cancer who have evidence of bone metastases should be treated with BMAs. Options include denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously, every 4 weeks; pamidronate, 90 mg intravenously, every 3 to 4 weeks; or zoledronic acid, 4 mg intravenously every 12 weeks or every 3 to 4 weeks. The analgesic effects of BMAs are modest, and they should not be used alone for bone pain. The Update Committee recommends that the current standard of care for supportive care and pain management—analgesia, adjunct therapies, radiotherapy, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy, and referral to supportive care and pain management—be applied. Evidence is insufficient to support the use of one BMA over another. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Tamoxifen is a widely utilized adjuvant anti-estrogen agent for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, known to undergo CYP2D6-mediated bioactivation to endoxifen. However, little is known regarding additional genetic and non-genetic determinants of optimal endoxifen plasma concentration. Therefore, 196 breast cancer patients on tamoxifen were enrolled in this prospective study over a 24-month period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacogenetic and drug-level analysis of tamoxifen and metabolites. Regression analysis indicated that besides CYP2D6, the recently described CYP3A4*22 genotype, seasonal variation, and concomitant use of CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants were significant predictors of endoxifen concentration. Of note, genetic variation explained 33 % of the variability while non-genetic variables accounted for 13 %. Given the proposed notion of a sub-therapeutic endoxifen concentration for predicting breast cancer recurrence, we set the therapeutic threshold at 18 nM, the 20th percentile for endoxifen level among enrolled patients in this cohort. Nearly 70 % of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers as well as extensive metabolizers on potent CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants exhibited endoxifen levels below 18 nM, while carriers of CYP3A4*22 were twofold less likely to be in sub-therapeutic range. Unexpectedly, endoxifen levels were 20 % lower during winter months than mean levels across seasons, which was also associated with lower vitamin D levels. CYP3A4*22 genotype along with sunshine exposure and vitamin D status may be unappreciated contributors of tamoxifen efficacy. The identified covariates along with demographic variables were integrated to create an endoxifen concentration prediction algorithm to pre-emptively evaluate the likelihood of individual patients falling below the optimal endoxifen concentration.

Introduction: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) have a 5-year survival rate of 50% using standard treatment that includes neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant radiation. Given this poor prognosis, we proposed use of an adjuvant regimen in the neoadjuvant setting, involving radiation with docetaxel for radiosensitization. Pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery (the best surrogate for overall survival) was the primary end-point of this single-arm prospective Phase II trial. Given that dose-dependent reductions in tumour RNA integrity mid-treatment were correlated with post-treatment pCRs in similar patients in the NCIC-CTG-MA.22 clinical trial (Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 119:347–56), we also assessed whether changes in tumour RNA integrity and concentration could be observed following this regimen. Methodology: Thirty-two patients with stage III non-metastatic LABC were enrolled at a single institution from 2009–2011. They were treated with neoadjuvant 5-Fluoro-uracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide (FEC) q3 weekly for 4 cycles followed by weekly Docetaxel (35 mg/m2) concurrently with regional radiation (45 Gy with 16 Gy boost in 25 & 5 fractions) for the first 6 of 9 weeks (D/R). Serial 14 gauge tumour core biopsies were taken from the patients pre-, mid- and post-treatment and 1 mm3 samples used to assess RNA quantity and quality using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. This was followed by a modified radical mastectomy. Results: Treatment-related toxicities included grade 3 resolving pneumonitis (6 patients), grade 3 dermatitis (6 patients) and one treatment-related death. The pCR rate was 23%–about twice the provincial rate for LABC. At a mean 21 months follow-up, the relapse-free survival was 100% in the pCR cohort and 65% among partial responders (PRs). While biopsies were not normalized for mass, little difference in RNA concentration was observed between pre-treatment and post-FEC tumour biopsies (means of 50 ± 15 nanograms/microliter and 50 ± 12 nanograms/microliter, respectively). In contrast, the mean tumour RNA concentration was reduced to 10 ± 2.1 nanograms/microliter post-D/R. While the post-treatment biopsies often yielded insufficient RNA for assignment of tumour RNA integrity (RIN) values, treatment response appeared to be associated with low tumour RNA integrity, since patients with disease progression or stable disease had higher RIN values than patients exhibiting PRs or pCRs. Conclusions: This is the first study to use a full chemotherapy regimen with radiation in the neo-adjuvant setting for LABC. Although not without toxicity, the regimen appeared to significantly improve the pCR rate for this high-risk group, resulting in a much-improved outcome even at short-term follow-up. In addition, the FEC→D/R regimen produced reductions in tumour RNA concentration, and treatment response appeared to be associated with reduced RNA integrity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-13.

The aromatase inhibitor anastrozole inhibits estrogen synthesis. Fulvestrant binds and accelerates degradation of estrogen receptors. We hypothesized that these two agents in combination might be more effective than anastrozole alone in patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer.Postmenopausal women with previously untreated metastatic disease were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either 1 mg of anastrozole orally every day (group 1), with crossover to fulvestrant alone strongly encouraged if the disease progressed, or anastrozole and fulvestrant in combination (group 2). Patients were stratified according to prior or no prior receipt of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Fulvestrant was administered intramuscularly at a dose of 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 14 and 28 and monthly thereafter. The primary end point was progression-free survival, with overall survival designated as a prespecified secondary outcome.The median progression-free survival was 13.5 months in group 1 and 15.0 months in group 2 (hazard ratio for progression or death with combination therapy, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.94; P=0.007 by the log-rank test). The combination therapy was generally more effective than anastrozole alone in all subgroups, with no significant interactions. Overall survival was also longer with combination therapy (median, 41.3 months in group 1 and 47.7 months in group 2; hazard ratio for death, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.00; P=0.05 by the log-rank test), despite the fact that 41% of the patients in group 1 crossed over to fulvestrant after progression. Three deaths that were possibly associated with treatment occurred in group 2. The rates of grade 3 to 5 toxic effects did not differ significantly between the two groups.The combination of anastrozole and fulvestrant was superior to anastrozole alone or sequential anastrozole and fulvestrant for the treatment of HR-positive metastatic breast cancer, despite the use of a dose of fulvestrant that was below the current standard. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca; SWOG ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00075764.).

As economic disparities lessen in some areas of the world, the burden of cancer has increased. In 2008, cancer caused more deaths worldwide than tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria combined (8.1 million v. 4.3 million).[1][1] More than 20% of all cancer deaths occur in low-income countries (per

In this article, we reviewed and quantified reporting of the risk of myelotoxicity, specifically febrile neutropenia (FN), and the related use of supportive care with colony-stimulating factor (CSF) or antibiotics in clinical trials published between January 2005 and June 2009, evaluating emerging regimens for the treatment of selected solid tumors. Our analysis showed that clinically significant neutropenia and neutropenia-related events were generally described in the studies evaluated (grade 3/4 neutropenia incidence, 72%; FN incidence, 53%). However, use of CSF and antibiotics was infrequently and inconsistently reported (trials reporting prophylactic CSF and antibiotics use: in the methods section, 38% and 10%, respectively; in the results section, 19% and 1%, respectively). These results highlight the need for a standardized approach to reporting neutropenic outcomes and use of supportive care measures. This can assist clinicians in prospectively managing relevant toxicities associated with these emerging regimens and thereby facilitate their safe and effective use in clinical practice.

Purpose Somatostatin analogs act directly on breast cancer cells and indirectly on insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. This trial was undertaken to assess whether octreotide would lower insulin and IGF-1 levels and reduce risk of breast cancer recurrence. Patients and Methods The NCIC CTG MA.14 (NCIC Clinical Trials Group MA.14) trial randomly assigned postmenopausal women to 5 years of tamoxifen 20 mg daily (TAM) or TAM plus 2 years of octreotide 90 mg depot intramuscular injections monthly (TAM-OCT) as adjuvant therapy. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and effects of treatment on IGF physiology. Results Among 667 women with a median follow-up of 7.9 years, 220 events occurred—108 with TAM-OCT and 112 with TAM. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs; TAM-OCT to TAM) were 0.93 for EFS (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.22; P = .62), 0.84 for RFS (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.18; P = .31), and 0.97 for OS (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.37; P = .86). Among patients with normal baseline gallbladder imaging, cholecystectomy was required in 23.0% of those receiving TAM-OCT but in only 1.4% of those receiving TAM (P < .001). At 4 months, TAM-OCT had significantly (P < .001) lowered IGF-1, IGF binding protein 3, and C-peptide levels. Older age (P = .02), tumor size (P = .001), nodal status (P = .01), high C-peptide levels (P < .001), and higher body mass index (BMI) in models excluding C-peptide (P < .001) were associated with poorer EFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Octreotide-related changes in circulating IGF-1 and C-peptide levels were statistically significant. Octreotide did not add significant clinical benefit. High C-peptide levels (surrogate for insulin secretion rate) and high BMI were associated with poor outcome.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with fec-d (5-fluorouracil&ndash, epirubicin&ndash, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) is superior to that with fec-100 alone in women with early-stage breast cancer. As the use of fec-d increased in clinical practice, health care providers anecdotally noted higher-than-expected toxicity rates and frequent early treatment discontinuations because of toxicity. In the present study, we compared the rates of serious adverse events in patients who received adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in routine clinical practice with the rates reported in the pacs-01 trial. We retrospectively reviewed all patients prescribed adjuvant fec-d for early-stage breast cancer at 4 regional cancer centres in Ontario. Information was collected from electronic and paper charts by a physician investigator from each centre. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and univariate regression. The 671 electronic and paper patient records reviewed showed a median patient age of 52.2 years, 229 patients (34.1%) with N0 disease, 508 patients (75.7%) with estrogen or progesterone receptor&ndash, positive disease (or both), and 113 patients (26%) with her2/neu&ndash, overexpressing breast cancer. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 152 patients (22.7%), most frequently at cycle 4, coincident with the initiation of docetaxel [78/152 (51.3%)]. Primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factor support was used in 235 patients (35%), and the rate of febrile neutropenia was significantly lower in those who received prophylaxis than in those who did not [15/235 (6.4%) vs. 137/436 (31.4%), p < 0.001, risk ratio: 0.20]. In routine clinical practice, treatment with fec-d is associated with a higher-than-expected rate of febrile neutropenia, in light of which, primary prophylaxis with growth factor should be considered, per international guidelines. Adoption based on clinical trial reports of new therapies into mainstream practice must be done carefully and with scrutiny.

Background: Although many emerging regimens that incorporate targeted agents may produce increased myelosuppressive side-effects, clinical data guiding colony-stimulating factor (CSF) use with these regimens are not readily available. This review assessed the reporting diligence around febrile neutropenia and the related use of CSF and antibiotics in published clinical trials evaluating emerging regimens for breast cancer treatment. Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized, controlled phase 3 breast cancer studies published between Jan 2005 and June 2009. After excluding trials of vaccines, hormonal therapy alone, and stem cell transplantation/mobilization, corresponding publications were retrieved and data extracted on the incidence of neutropenia and its complications and CSF/antibiotic use. We then calculated the percentage of these publications that reported each outcome. Results: Of 463 trials identified from the search, only 73 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 70% and 55% of trials reported the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, respectively (Table). Neutropenia-related hospitalizations were reported in 3% of trials. Prophylactic use of CSF and antibiotics was defined in the methods section of 59% and 23% of trials, respectively; and only reported in the results section of 22% and 5% of trials, respectively. Conclusion: Clinically significant neutropenia and neutropenia-related events (including febrile neutropenia) were generally described in the studies evaluated; however, the reported use of CSF and/or antibiotics was infrequent and inconsistent in the published literature of emerging regimens. A standardized approach to reporting neutropenic outcomes as well as the use of supportive care measures can assist cliniciansto prospectively manage the relevant toxicities associated with these emerging regimens and thereby facilitate their safe and effective use in clinical practice. Table: Reporting of myelotoxicity data in published phase 3 trials CSF = colony-stimulating factor Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-15-02.

Purpose: Clusterin is an antiapoptotic protein activated in response to cellular stress. OGX-011 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits clusterin expression. The primary objective of this phase II trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. Experimental Design: Women with measurable metastatic breast cancer and ≤1 chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Three loading doses of OGX-011 640 mg i.v. followed by weekly OGX-011 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) were given. A two-stage design was used with a hypothesis of H0 ≤35% and Ha ≥55%. Objective response in ≥6 of the first 14 patients was required for the trial to continue to the second stage. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles were delivered (range, 2-10). Five partial responses were confirmed for a 33% response rate (95% confidence interval, 11.8-61.6%) with a further 9 (60%) patients showing stable disease. The median duration of stable disease was 9.3 months. The median time to progression was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.62-9.43 months). Toxic effects were similar to those with single agent docetaxel. Although serum clusterin decreased on treatment, there was no relationship observed between the magnitude of decrease and response. Conclusion: The combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 is well tolerated and clinical activity was seen in these patients with metastatic breast cancer, but there was an insufficient number of responses to meet the criteria for proceeding to the second stage of accrual.

Background: Increasing systemic treatment and shortages of oncology professionals in Canada require innovative approaches to the safe and effective delivery of intravenous (IV) cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review of the clinical and scientific literature, and an environmental scan of models in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. We then developed a framework for the organization and delivery of IV systemic treatment. Methods: The systematic review covered the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthStar databases. The environmental scan retrieved published and unpublished sources, coupled with a free key word search using the Google search engine. The Systemic Treatment Working Group reviewed the evidence and developed a draft framework using evidence-based analysis, existing recommendations from various jurisdictions, and expert opinion based on experience and consensus. The draft was assessed by Ontario stakeholders and reviewed and approved by Cancer Care Ontario. Results: The poor quantity and quality of the evidence necessitated a consensus-derived model. That model comprises four levels of care determined by a regional systemic treatment program and three integrated structures (integrated cancer programs, affiliate institutions, and satellite institutions), each with a defined scope of practice and a specific organizational framework. Interpretation: New models of care are urgently required beyond large centres, particularly in geographically remote or rural areas. Despite limited applicable evidence, the development and successful implementation of this framework is intended to create sustainable, accessible, quality care and to measurably improve patient outcomes.

Cancer in developing countries is growing and will soon be a major problem as life expectancy increases. This article outlines the experience and future objectives of a partnership between Yemeni and Canadian oncology professionals in their attempt to develop a National Oncology Program in Yemen. We review current knowledge of the epidemiology, social, educational and economic challenges as well as suggested initial steps in developing a relevant oncology program for this society.

Background Blood levels of the extracellular domain of HER-2/neu (ECD/HER2) have been suggested to have potential as a tumor marker in breast cancer. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of baseline levels of ECD/HER2, but more importantly changes in levels over time, in women with metastatic breast cancer. Methods Baseline and serial levels of ECD/HER2 were measured in 158 women with newly-diagnosed metastatic breast cancer, in whom we previously performed serial measurement of plasma osteopontin. ECD/HER2 was measured in 1,282 serum samples using a validated ELISA at baseline and every 3–12 weeks during and after therapy until death (median, n = 8 samples per patient). Multivariate time-dependent survival analyses were conducted using models that right-censored patient outcomes 3, 6 and 12 months after last known ECD/HER2 measurement. Results Thirty-four patients (22%) had elevated baseline ECD/HER2 (median 10.2 ng/ml: range 4.1–40.4 ng/ml). In univariate analysis, elevated baseline ECD/HER2 was associated with short survival (P = 0.001). In a multivariate model incorporating standard clinical prognostic factors, baseline ECD/HER2 was significantly associated with survival duration (RR 1.029; P = 0.020). Presence of visceral metastases and ECOG status 2–4 also retained significance. In a multivariate model incorporating standard prognostic factors and changes in sequential ECD/HER2 levels, an ECD/HER2 increase of >12 ng/ml at any time was the variable with most prognostic value for poor survival (RR 6.10; P = 0.0003); poor ECOG status also retained significance. Conclusion Increases over time of ECD/HER2 levels were strongly associated with poor survival in this cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer.

First- and second-line chemotherapy with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer yield a modest improvement in survival with potentially significant toxicity. Subsequent lines of chemotherapy yield response rates of 20–25%, with an unknown impact on survival. Perifosine, an oral alkylphospholipid structurally related to miltefosine, has marked activity against breast cancer cell lines and xenograft models, with broad spectrum cellular effects. To determine the efficacy and toxicity of perifosine in patients with metastatic breast cancer patients after up to 2 lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. 18 patients were enrolled, and 17 treated, using a loading/maintenance dose schedule, (day 1, 300 mg, maintenance 150 mg days 2–21) every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Median age of patients was 54 (28–69), 16/17 were female, ECOG performance status was 0/1 in 16 patients. Fifteen received at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease (maximum 2). A median of 2 cycles (range 1–13) was administered per patient. Sixteen were evaluable for response: 2 had SD for 4 cycles, 1 SD for 13 cycles, 13 progressed by cycle 2. Grade 3/4 drug-related non-hematologic toxicities include: diarrhea (2), vomiting (2), nausea (2), fatigue (2) and anorexia (1). No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were seen. Median time to progression was 8 weeks (7–15 weeks). No objective responses were seen in this group of pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Disease stabilization was observed in 19% at 2 months.

Purpose: Osteopontin is a malignancy-associated protein measurable in blood and tumor tissue. To evaluate its prognostic value in advanced disease, we conducted a prospective clinical study measuring serial osteopontin plasma levels in women with metastatic breast cancer throughout the course of their disease. Experimental Design: One hundred fifty-eight women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Plasma osteopontin was measured using our validated ELISA, at baseline and every 3 to 12 weeks during and after therapy until death. Multivariate time-dependent survival analyses were conducted using models that right censored patient outcomes 3, 6, and 12 months after the last known osteopontin measurement. Results: Osteopontin was measured in 1,378 samples (median, 9 per patient). Ninety-nine patients had elevated baseline osteopontin (median, 177 ng/mL; range, 1-2,648 ng/mL). In univariate analysis, elevated baseline osteopontin was associated with short survival (P = 0.02). In a multivariate model incorporating standard prognostic factors, baseline osteopontin was significantly associated with survival duration (relative risk, 1.001; P = 0.038). Metastasis-free interval, visceral metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 2 to 4 also retained significance. In a multivariate model incorporating standard prognostic factors and changes in sequential osteopontin levels, an osteopontin increase of >250 ng/mL at any time was the variable with the most prognostic value for poor survival (relative risk, 3.26; P = 0.0003), and poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status also retained significance. Conclusions: This is the first study to show that in women with metastatic breast cancer, increases in osteopontin levels over time are strongly associated with poor survival. Sequential monitoring of osteopontin may have use in making treatment decisions for these patients.

Articular cartilage degeneration is a central pathological feature of osteoarthritis. Cartilage in the adult does not regenerate in vivo and, as a result, cartilage damage in osteoarthritis is irreversible. With our ever-aging population, osteoarthritis has become a leading cause of disability and unfortunately, no optimal treatments for osteoarthritis are currently available. To address this problem, a research community is focused on the development of both natural and synthetic biodegradable tissue scaffolds. The scaffolds must contain depressions or holes for the purpose of chondrocyte seeding and growth in order to create an implantable construct. In addition to chondrocytes, cartilage tissue consists of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Studies of many tissue types have established that ECM plays an important role in regulating cell behavior and controlling processes such as tissue differentiation and tumor progression. Unlike most natural tissues, adult cartilage ECM is exceptionally dense and lacking in vascularity, which makes it difficult for chondrocytes to be transplanted directly into the matrix. Current methods of creating cell home sites through chemical decellularization of the ECM degrade the mechanical integrity of the cartilage tissue. The research conducted here used a mechanical, rather than chemical, method to create cell home sites. A novel micropunching machine was developed to fabricate 200 μm diameter holes in cartilage, thereby creating a porous natural scaffold while maintaining a healthy ECM. Equine articular cartilage slices were harvested from the cadaver’s back knee joint and cryo-sectioned into 100 μm thick slices. Using die clearances of 3.7%, 6.8%, and 8.9%, the results indicate that micro-scale holes can be mechanically punched in cartilage tissue. The maximum punching force showed a slight trend of decreasing as die clearance increased, but there was no statistical significance. Punching force, as well as hole size, was highly dependent on sample hydration. Upon inspection, the resulting hole sizes were approximately 50 μm to 150 um, indicating 25% to 75% shrinkage in reference to the male punch diameter. Finally, the resulting hole shape was observed to be slightly non-circular and the edges of the hole exhibited a raggedness, which was indicative of the cartilage tearing during hole punching.Copyright © 2014 by ASME

AIM: To show a new paradigm of simultaneously testing whether breast cancer therapies impact other causes of death. METHODS: MA.14 allocated 667 postmenopausal women to 5 years of tamoxifen 20 mg/daily ± 2 years of octreotide 90 mg, given by depot intramuscular injections monthly. Event-free survival was the primary endpoint of MA.14; at median 7.9 years, the tamoxifen+octreotide and tamoxifen arms had similar event-free survival (P = 0.62). Overall survival was a secondary endpoint, and the two trial arms also had similar overall survival (P = 0.86). We used the median 9.8 years follow-up to examine by intention-to-treat, the multivariate time-to-breast cancer-specific (BrCa) and other cause (OC) mortality with log-normal survival analysis adjusted by treatment and stratification factors. We tested whether baseline factors including Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein-3, C-peptide, body mass index, and 25-hydroxy vitamin D were associated with (1) all cause mortality, and if so and (2) cause-specific mortality. We also fit step-wise forward cause-specific adjusted models. RESULTS: The analyses were performed on 329 patients allocated tamoxifen and 329 allocated tamoxifen+octreotide. The median age of MA.14 patients was 60.1 years: 447 (82%) < 70 years and 120 (18%) ≥ 70 years. There were 170 deaths: 106 (62.3%) BrCa; 55 (32.4%) OC, of which 24 were other malignancies, 31 other causes of death; 9 (5.3%) patients with unknown cause of death were excluded from competing risk assessments. BrCa and OC deaths were not significantly different by treatment arm (P = 0.40): tamoxifen patients experienced 50 BrCa and 32 OC deaths, while tamoxifen + octreotide patients experienced 56 BrCa and 23 OC deaths. Proportionately more deaths (P = 0.004) were from BrCa for patients < 70 years, where 70% of deaths were due to BrCa, compared to 54% for those ≥ 70 years of age. The proportion of deaths from OC increased with increasing body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.02). Higher pathologic T and N were associated with more BrCa deaths (P < 0.0001 and 0.002, respectively). The cumulative hazard plot for BrCa and OC mortality indicated the concurrent accrual of both types of death throughout follow-up, that is the existence of competing risks of mortality. MA.14 therapy did not impact mortality (P = 0.77). Three baseline patient and tumor characteristics were differentially associated with cause of death: older patients experienced more OC (P = 0.01) mortality; patients with T1 tumors and hormone receptor positive tumors had less BrCa mortality (respectively, P = 0.01, P = 0.06). Additionally, step-wise cause-specific models indicated that patients with node negative disease experienced less BrCa mortality (P = 0.002); there was weak evidence that, lower C-peptide (P = 0.08) was associated with less BrCa mortality, while higher BMI (P = 0.01) was associated with worse OC mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate here a new paradigm of simultaneous testing of therapeutics directed at multiple diseases for which postmenopausal women are concurrently at risk. Octreotide LAR did not significantly impact breast cancer or other cause mortality, although different baseline factors influenced type of death.

The Editor Current Oncology June 5, 2013 Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women1, and estrogen receptor (er)–positive breast cancer is the most common subtype2. An expert consensus meeting in 2009 on the primary therapy of early breast cancer asserted that adjuvant endocrine therapy, including tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, should be given according to breast cancer subtype as determined by hormone receptor (hr) testing3. The most common technique used for hr testing in the 1970s was ligand-binding assays, but they were replaced by immunohistochemistry (ihc) in the early to mid-1990s after that technique was shown to be equivalent or superior to the ligand-binding assay4. Immunohistochemistry has since been used to determine which patients should be offered adjuvant endocrine therapy4, although the exact threshold for er or progesterone receptor (pr) positivity has been debated. Data on the degree of benefit associated with adjuvant hormone therapy for weakly positive patients are insufficient5, which has made the benefit–risk analysis challenging for physicians to perform for adjuvant hormonal therapy this patient population. Before the 1999 publication of Harvey et al.4, the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy in er-positive patients was left to individual physician discretion. Historically, guidelines established a 10% threshold for er or pr positivity, but evidence from several studies indicated that a response to tamoxifen therapy may be seen with as little as 1% of the tumour staining positive2,4. It is therefore currently recommended that adjuvant endocrine therapy be considered for breast cancer patients with any positive level of er expression above the 1% threshold2,3. The same threshold applies to pr positivity. However, in the 1%–10% category, American Society for Clinical Oncology recommendations have added the proviso that “it is reasonable for oncologists to discuss the pros and cons of endocrine therapy with patients whose tumors contain low levels of er (1%–10% weakly positive cells) by ihc, and to make an informed decision based on the balance”2. Data concerning the positive predictive value of low-level er or pr expression—in the range of 1%–10% positive cells by ihc—are limited3. Furthermore, it is not known whether most patients with low levels of er expression are actually being prescribed adjuvant hormonal therapy. We therefore undertook to determine whether hormonal therapy is being prescribed to patients with low er positivity by ihc (1%–10% of cells positively stained, regardless of intensity) compared with patients with er positivity greater than 10% (greater than 10% of tumour cells positively stained). We reviewed 2018 consecutive patients seen at one institution from 2006 to 2011. The 1387 patients with invasive cancers staged T1c–T4 (a priori noninvasive or small tumours in which hormonal therapy might not be recommended as beneficial were excluded) had completed treatment. Of those patients, 46 were weakly er- or pr-positive, and 29 of them received hormonal therapy. Another 1073 were strongly er- or pr-positive, and 890 of them received hormonal therapy. The remaining 268 were er-negative. Of all the er-positive patients eligible for hormonal therapy, the percentage not prescribed adjuvant hormonal therapy was significantly higher in the weakly positive subgroup than in the strongly positive subgroup (17 / 46 = 37% vs. 183 / 1073 = 17%, p = 0.0014 by Fisher exact t-test). In 88% of cases, weakly positive er or pr patients who did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy were described as being “er/pr negative” in the dictations by their oncologists. In the remaining 12% of cases, the medical oncologist decided against the use of hormonal therapy based on low anticipated benefit. Oncologists have struggled with managing weakly positive er or pr patients, given a lack of data about the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy in this low-expression range. After stratifying breast cancer patients into two categories of hr positivity, we discovered a significant difference in use of adjuvant hormonal therapy between patients that were weakly and strongly positive. Those results highlight a need to evaluate how decision-making for the use of adjuvant hormonal therapy might differ in weakly positive er or pr patients. It appears that the decision not to give hormonal therapy to weakly positive er or pr patients is a result of an interpretation of their receptor status as hr-negativity in 88% of cases, presumably based on earlier cut-off levels for what would be considered hormone-positive—highlighting the need for ongoing knowledge transfer as new tests, guidelines, and cut-off values are adopted in oncology. Current practice patterns in the use of adjuvant hormonal therapy in weakly positive er or pr breast cancer differ from those in strongly positive er or pr breast cancer. Although patients with very low hr-positive expression levels derive an unclear magnitude of benefit from hormonal therapy, discussion of the use of adjuvant hormonal therapy in this patient population is encouraged.

PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-one patients with measurable MBC were studied. Three patients were ineligible and were excluded from analysis. The planned dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if at least 12 months had elapsed from completion of treatment to recurrence. RESULTS The most severe toxicity was granulocytopenia. Ten patients (20.8%) were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. The protocol was amended to a starting dose of 75 mg/m2 for the last 16 patients. Sixty percent of patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). After two protocol amendments, the use of a premedication regimen of oral dexamethasone and i.v. H1 and H2 blockers prevented significant HSRs. Edema developed in 62% of patients and was cumulative, was present in 50% who received greater than 400 mg/m2, and was not improved by premedication regimens. Following an independent radiology review, 22 partial remissions and four complete responses in 47 assessable patients were confirmed (response rate, 55%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 69%). The response rate for 15 assessable patients registered at 75 mg/m2 was 40% (95% CI, 16% to 67%); for 32 assessable patients registered at 100 mg/m2, the response rate was 63%, (95% CI, 43% to 78%). CONCLUSION Docetaxel is an active agent in MBC. Its activity as a single agent is comparable to many combination chemotherapy regimens and is not affected by prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies are ongoing to improve its therapeutic index and to incorporate docetaxel in combination chemotherapy regimens.

Background: Elevated levels of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with adverse outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, relationships between CTCs and various patient-related factors that may impact outcome remain undefined. Consequently, associations of CTC counts with obesity and metabolic factors were evaluated in order to gain insight into potential interactions between patient physiology and disease burden. We hypothesized that obesity and associated metabolic factors would be associated with higher CTC counts. Methods: Non-diabetic women with metastatic BC beginning a new line of treatment due to progressive disease were recruited from four Ontario cancer hospitals between February 2013 and April 2015. Patients provided blood for CTC analysis, which was completed within 72 hours of collection using the Janssen CellSearch platform. Fasting serum was also collected for assessment of metabolic factors including glucose (mmol/L), insulin (pmol/L), leptin (ng/mL) and adiponectin (ng/mL). Associations of CTC counts with these factors, as well as anthropometric measurements (height (cm), weight (kg), BMI (kg/m2)) were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients after transforming the variables involved to normality. For CTC counts, the log transformation with half integer correction was used. Results: 96 patients with a median age of 60.5 years completed the study. Most were post-menopausal (87, 90.6%) and exhibited grade II/III tumors (75, 78.1%). The majority of patients had hormone receptor positive disease (83, 86.5%), but 16.7% (16) were HER2 positive and 10.4% (10) were triple negative. The number of CTCs observed ranged from 0 to 1238 (median 2, geometric mean 3.63). No CTCs were detected in 29 patients (30.2%), whereas 25 patients (26 %) exhibited counts of 1 to 4 CTCs and 42 (43.8%) had 5 or more CTCs. CTCs were not significantly associated with tumor characteristics including ER/PgR, HER2, grade, stage (T/N) or lymphovascular invasion. The number of CTCs inversely correlated with BMI (r=-0.26, p=0.01), leptin (r=-0.29, p=0.004), and leptin-adiponectin ratio (r=-0.3, p=0.004). A similar trend that approached significance was noted for body weight (r=-0.19, p=0.07), insulin (r=-0.19, p=0.06) and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA, an estimate of insulin resistance, r=-0.2, p=0.055). Conversely, adiponectin (r=0.18, p=0.07) and height (r=0.18, p=0.07) were positively associated with CTC counts in correlations that neared significance. No associations were observed for age (r=0.09, p=0.4) or glucose (r=-0.09, p=0.4). Conclusions: Obesity associated metabolic factors including weight, BMI, insulin, HOMA and leptin were inversely associated (and adiponectin and height positively associated) with CTC counts. These patterns are consistent with weight loss and/or cachexia in women with elevated CTC counts who have higher disease burden. Additional analyses are underway to further characterize these associations and include assessment of serum albumin, free fatty acids, creatine kinase and hepcidin. Citation Format: Dowling RJO, Chang MC, Lohmann AE, Ennis M, Amir E, Elser C, Brezden-Masley C, Vandenberg T, Lee E, Fazaee K, Stambolic V, Goodwin PJ. Obesity associated factors are inversely associated with circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-09.

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the association of inflammatory/tumor markers and CTCs in women with progressing metastatic breast cancer prior to commencing a new line of systemic therapy. Methods: From February 2013 to April 2015, 96 patients with metastatic BC about to start a new treatment (due to progression), without current diabetes or use of anti-inflammatory agents, were recruited from four Ontario cancer hospitals. Women provided fasting blood for inflammatory and tumor markers and CTC measurement; CTCs were assayed within 72 hours of collection using CellSearch. Blood was frozen at -80C until assays were performed in a single batch (C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, PAI-1, Ca15-3, Ca125, VEGF, TNFa). Associations of CTCs with blood factors were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients after transforming the variables to normality. For CTCs the transformation log(x+0.5) was used. Associations with categorical variables were tested using one-way analysis of variance. P values Results: Median age of patients was 60.5 years, 87 (90.6%) were post-menopausal, 83 (86.5%) had hormone receptor positive BC, 16 (16.7%) HER2 positive BC, 10 (10.4%) triple negative; 75 (78.1%) grade II/III. At the time of CTC measurement, bone, lung, liver and brain metastases were present in 79%, 44%, 40% and 6% of patients respectively, with 54%, 37%, 35% and 3% having progression at these sites respectively. PAI-1 and CA15-3 exceeded the limit of the assay in 11 and 5 cases respectively (the upper limit of the assay was used in the analysis). 33.4% of patients were starting first line therapy, 25% second line and 16.7% third line. CTC counts (per 7.5cc) ranged from 0 to 1238 (median 2, geometric mean 3.63); none were detected in 29 (30.2%) patients, 1 to 4 in 25 (26%) and 5 or more in 42 (43.8%) patients. CTCs were not associated with age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, line of treatment, lymph-vascular invasion or tumor grade. Compared to metastatic disease at other sites, CTCs were higher in the presence of bone (p=0.027) and liver metastases (p=0.002) and with progressing bone (p=0.018) and liver (p=0.012) metastases. CTCs were significantly associated with CRP (R =0.25, p=0.014), IL-6 (R=0.31, p=0.002), PAI-1 (R=0.31, p=0.002), Ca15-3 (R=0.44, p= Conclusion: CTCs were associated with bone and liver metastases and with higher levels of inflammatory and tumor markers, potentially reflecting tumor burden. Additional inflammatory marker assays are underway. Future studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Citation Format: Lohmann AE, Chang M, Dowling RJO, Ennis M, Amir E, Elser C, Brezden-Masley C, Vandenberg T, Lee E, Fazae K, Stambolic V, Goodwin PJ. Association of inflammatory and tumor markers with circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-12.

Breast cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and early death for women. Despite aggressive Implementation of preventive measures including screening and adjuvant therapy, this disease will likely continue to have a significant impact unless better treatments are found. A number of new agents have recently been developed that show promising results in the setting of metastatic disease including losoxantrone, vinorelbine, edatrexate, paclitaxel and docetaxel. Some have shown exciting activity where tumor progression has occurred following anthra-cycline therapy. Appropriate evaluation of new chemotherapeutic agents requires a clear description of the population studied as well as standardized assessments of outcomes. Evaluations are more relevant and more quickly done in multicenter trials. Because of the heterogeneity of metastatic breast cancer and differences in outcome measurement, randomized trials continue to be essential in defining which agents are the most appropriate candidates for further study.

Purpose Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) are commonly used adjuvant regimens in women with early breast cancer. In a previous trial in women with locally advanced breast cancer, 3 months of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) administered every 2 weeks (dose-dense) was equivalent to 6 months of CEF. We hypothesized that 3 months of paclitaxel after dose-dense EC (EC/T) would be superior to CEF or AC/T. Methods After lumpectomy or mastectomy, women 60 years of age or younger with axillary node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive CEF, EC/T, or AC/T for 6 months. This article reports the interim analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was planned after 227 recurrences. Results A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 30.4 months. Hazard ratios for recurrence are as follows: AC/T versus CEF, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.99), P = .005; AC/T versus EC/T, 1.68 (95% CI, 1.25 to 2.27), P = .0006; and EC/T versus CEF, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22), P = .46. Three-year RFS rates for CEF, EC/T, and AC/T are 90.1%, 89.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. There was more febrile neutropenia with CEF (22.3%) and EC/T (16.4%) compared with AC/T (4.8%), but more neuropathy with the last two regimens. Conclusion Three-weekly AC/T is significantly inferior to CEF or EC/T in terms of RFS. It is too early to detect any difference between CEF and dose-dense EC/T.

Purpose Anthracyclines are a component of breast cancer chemotherapy regimens in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Anthracycline rechallenge for metastatic disease, for those previously exposed to adjuvant anthracyclines, may not be considered because of concerns about efficacy, tolerability, and cumulative cardiotoxicity. Patients and Methods This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial examined the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 35 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 as first-line therapy, delivered every 3 weeks, in 70 patients who developed metastatic disease more than 12 months after completion of an adjuvant anthracycline-containing regimen. Seven patients discontinued treatment early and were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Results After a median of six cycles, the objective response rate was 38%. An additional 33% of patients achieved stable disease lasting more than 6 months, for an overall clinical benefit rate of 71%. The estimated median time to progression was 12.2 months. Median overall survival time was 16.5 months. Clinical response was equally robust in patients with and without prior taxane exposure. Treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 10%), dyspnea (9%), and neutropenia (9%). One (1.4%) of 70 patients discontinued treatment as a result of PPE. One patient (1.4%) experienced an infusion reaction requiring discontinuation. No symptomatic cardiac events were observed. Conclusion PLD plus cyclophosphamide is effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received prior adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The majority of patients experienced a clinical benefit without any significant impact on cardiac function.

Background: In the early 1990s, the role of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (EBC) was not established. Similarly, optimum timing relative to adjuvant chemotherapy and efficacy of tamoxifen in hormone receptor-negative tumors were unclear. Patients and methods: Premenopausal women with EBC, any hormone receptor status, after surgery received standard adjuvant chemotherapy [doxorubicin (adriamycin)/cyclophosphamide, cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil] followed by randomization to tamoxifen or placebo for 5 years. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity, and compliance with therapy. Results: Median follow-up for 672 women was 9.7 years. Multivariate analysis showed improved DFS [78.2% versus 71.3% at 5 years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; P = 0.056] and a trend for improved OS (86.6% versus 82.1% at 5 years; HR 0.78; P = 0.12). There was no evidence of greater benefit for the receptor-positive subgroup. Compliance with treatment was suboptimal in both arms, with 103 (31%) women on tamoxifen and 70 (21%) on placebo-stopping therapy early because of toxicity, refusal, or other choices. Conclusions: Adjuvant tamoxifen, given after chemotherapy to premenopausal women with EBC, improved 5-year

Tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant therapy for patients with breast cancer for several decades. Various recently completed adjuvant trials using aromatase inhibitors have shown the superiority of these agents over Tamoxifen or placebo, when used in post-menopausal women. The results from these trials present a challenging situation for practicing oncologists with regards to the choice, duration, sequence of therapy, follow-up and side-effects of aromatase inhibitors. Various management issues from a practical angle for oncologists are discussed for the effective use of these agents, with an evidence-based approach.

Metastasis is the spread of cancer cells from a primary site, resulting in the establishment of secondary tumors in distant locations (1, 2, 3). Certain types of cancer have organ-specific preferences for metastatic growth, and breast and prostate cancers often preferentially metastasize to bone (2,3). In fact, it has been estimated that the majority of breast and prostate cancer patients who succumb to their disease will have bone metastases at the time of death (4,5). Bone metastasis has significant clinical and quality-of-life implications for cancer patients, including severe bone pain, increased susceptibility to fractures, bone deformability, neurological impingement, hypercalcemia, and compromise of bone marrow function (reviewed in refs. (6, 7, 8).

601 Background: Lapatinib (L) was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than trastuzumab (T) when combined with a taxane (Tax) as first line therapy for HER2+ MBC. We report the e...