Search

Additional file 4. Routine register design in 5 EN-BIRTH study hospitals and data quality dimensions.

Additional file 13. Barriers and enablers to routine reporting and documentation for KMC in the EN-BIRTH study.

Summary Background Progress in reducing maternal and neonatal deaths and stillbirths is impeded by data gaps, especially regarding coverage and quality of care in hospitals. We aimed to assess the validity of indicators of maternal and newborn health-care coverage around the time of birth in survey data and routine facility register data. Methods Every Newborn-BIRTH Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals was an observational study in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania. We included women and their newborn babies who consented on admission to hospital. Exclusion critiera at admission were no fetal heartbeat heard or imminent birth. For coverage of uterotonics to prevent post-partum haemorrhage, early initiation of breastfeeding (within 1 h), neonatal bag-mask ventilation, kangaroo mother care (KMC), and antibiotics for clinically defined neonatal infection (sepsis, pneumonia, or meningitis), we collected time-stamped, direct observation or case note verification data as gold standard. We compared data reported via hospital exit surveys and via hospital registers to the gold standard, pooled using random effects meta-analysis. We calculated population-level validity ratios (measured coverage to observed coverage) plus individual-level validity metrics. Findings We observed 23 471 births and 840 mother–baby KMC pairs, and verified the case notes of 1015 admitted newborn babies regarding antibiotic treatment. Exit-survey-reported coverage for KMC was 99·9% (95% CI 98·3–100) compared with observed coverage of 100% (99·9–100), but exit surveys underestimated coverage for uterotonics (84·7% [79·1–89·5]) vs 99·4% [98·7–99·8] observed), bag-mask ventilation (0·8% [0·4–1·4]) vs 4·4% [1·9–8·1]), and antibiotics for neonatal infection (74·7% [55·3–90·1] vs 96·4% [94·0–98·6] observed). Early breastfeeding coverage was overestimated in exit surveys (53·2% [39·4–66·8) vs 10·9% [3·8–21·0] observed). “Don’t know” responses concerning clinical interventions were more common in the exit survey after caesarean birth. Register data underestimated coverage of uterotonics (77·9% [37·8–99·5] vs 99·2% [98·6–99·7] observed), bag-mask ventilation (4·3% [2·1–7·3] vs 5·1% [2·0–9·6] observed), KMC (92·9% [84·2–98·5] vs 100% [99·9–100] observed), and overestimated early breastfeeding (85·9% (58·1–99·6) vs 12·5% [4·6–23·6] observed). Inter-hospital heterogeneity was higher for register-recorded coverage than for exit survey report. Even with the same register design, accuracy varied between hospitals. Interpretation Coverage indicators for newborn and maternal health care in exit surveys had low accuracy for specific clinical interventions, except for self-report of KMC, which had high sensitivity after admission to a KMC ward or corner and could be considered for further assessment. Hospital register design and completion are less standardised than surveys, resulting in variable data quality, with good validity for the best performing sites. Because approximately 80% of births worldwide take place in facilities, standardising register design and information systems has the potential to sustainably improve the quality of data on care at birth. Funding Children's Investment Fund Foundation and Swedish Research Council.

Background In 2012, the UN Commission on Life Saving Commodities (UNCoLSC) articulated a series of recommendations to expand access to 13 life-saving reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) commodities with the greatest potential to reduce preventable deaths. We conducted a five-year longitudinal assessment of progress towards achieving these recommendations among countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Methods Between 2013 and 2017, national reviews were undertaken at two time points among 14 countries with a high burden of preventable maternal-child deaths who were receiving support from a multi-UN agency RMNCH technical support and financing mechanism. Data were drawn from national health documentation (e.g. strategic plans, policies, guidelines); logistics management information systems; national household and health facility surveys; and interviews with governments and development partners. Results Over time, the percent of health facilities with stock availability showed a statistically significant increase of five percentage points from 69% to 74% (median). Recent training at health facility also displayed a significant increase of eight percentage points from 38% to 46% (median). National RMNCH coordination mechanisms, treatment guidelines, and national training curricula and job-aids were near fully redressed. However, countries continue to face persistent supply chain challenges including national stock-outs, tracking commodities throughout the supply chain, and strengthening medicine control laboratories. Conclusions While substantial progress has been made in improving access to life-saving commodities, including stock availability and workforce training at health facilities, additional efforts are required to improve regulatory efficiency, enhance commodity quality and safety, and reduce supply chain fragmentation.

Background: To achieve Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Coverage, programmatic data are essential. The Every Newborn Action Plan, agreed by all United Nations member states and >80 development partners, includes an ambitious Measurement Improvement Roadmap. Quality of care at birth is prioritised by both Every Newborn and Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality strategies, hence metrics need to advance from health service contact alone, to content of care. As facility births increase, monitoring using routine facility data in DHIS2 has potential, yet validation research has mainly focussed on maternal recall surveys. The Every Newborn - Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study aims to validate selected newborn and maternal indicators for routine tracking of coverage and quality of facility-based care for use at district, national and global levels. Methods: EN-BIRTH is an observational study including >20000 facility births in three countries (Tanzania, Bangladesh and Nepal) to validate selected indicators. Direct clinical observation will be compared with facility register data and a pre-discharge maternal recall survey for indicators including: uterotonic administration, immediate newborn care, neonatal resuscitation and Kangaroo mother care. Indicators including neonatal infection management and antenatal corticosteroid administration, which cannot be easily observed, will be validated using inpatient records. Trained clinical observers in Labour/Delivery ward, Operation theatre, and Kangaroo mother care ward/areas will collect data using a tablet-based customised data capturing application. Sensitivity will be calculated for numerators of all indicators and specificity for those numerators with adequate information. Other objectives include comparison of denominator options (ie, true target population or surrogates) and quality of care analyses, especially regarding intervention timing. Barriers and enablers to routine recording and data usage will be assessed by data flow assessments, quantitative and qualitative analyses. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first large, multi-country study validating facility-based routine data compared to direct observation for maternal and newborn care, designed to provide evidence to inform selection of a core list of indicators recommended for inclusion in national DHIS2. Availability and use of such data are fundamental to drive progress towards ending the annual 5.5 million preventable stillbirths, maternal and newborn deaths.

Background It is estimated that 287,000 women worldwide die annually from pregnancy and childbirth-related conditions, and 6.9 million under-five children die each year, of which about 3 million are newborns. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. The maternal health situation in Tanzania mainland and Zanzibar is similar to other sub-Saharan countries. This study assessed the availability, accessibility and quality of emergency obstetric care services and essential resources available for maternal and child health services in Zanzibar. Methods From October and November 2012, a cross-sectional health facility survey was conducted in 79 health facilities in Zanzibar. The health facility tools developed by the Averting Maternal Death and Disability program were adapted for local use. Results Only 7.6 % of the health facilities qualified as functioning basic EmONC (Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care) facilities and 9 % were comprehensive EmONC facilities. Twenty-eight percent were partially performing basic EmONC and the remaining 55.7 % were not providing EmONC. Neonatal resuscitation was performed in 80 % of the hospitals and only 17.4 % of the other health facilities that were surveyed. Based on World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria, the study revealed a gap of 20 % for minimum provision of EmONC facilities per 500,000 population. The met need at national level (proportion of women with major direct obstetric complications treated in a health facility providing EmONC) was only 33.1 % in the 12 months preceding the survey. The study found that there was limited availability of human resources in all visited health facilities, particularly for the higher cadres, as per Zanzibar minimum staff requirements. Conclusion There is a need to strengthen human resource capacity at primary health facilities through training of health care providers to improve EmONC services, as well as provision of necessary equipment and supplies to reduce workload at the higher referral health facilities and increase geographic access.