1. Effects of Lower Limb Heat Therapy, Exercise Training, or a Combined Intervention on Vascular Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Author
-
CHENG, JEM L., PIZZOLA, CHRISTINA A., MATTOOK, KEIRA C., NOGUCHI, KENNETH S., ARMSTRONG, CALVIN M., BAGRI, GURLEEN K., and MACDONALD, MAUREEN J.
- Subjects
- *
CARDIOPULMONARY fitness , *LEG , *EXERCISE therapy , *THERMOTHERAPY , *STATISTICAL sampling , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *HEAT , *MUSCLE strength , *COMBINED modality therapy , *CARDIOVASCULAR system physiology , *COMPARATIVE studies , *BRACHIAL artery - Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 8 wk of no intervention (CON), lower limb heat therapy (HEAT), moderate-intensity exercise training (EX), or combined training and therapy (HEATEX) in young, healthy recreationally active adults. Methods: Sixty participants (23 ± 3 yr, 30 females) were randomly allocated into CON (n = 15), HEAT (n = 15), EX (n = 14), or HEATEX (n = 16). The primary outcome was vascular function, assessed through brachial artery flow-mediated dilation tests. Secondary measures included arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2peak), body composition, and quadriceps muscle strength. Results: There were no differences in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation between the groups before and after the interventions (all P > 0.05). Both interventions with a heating component were associated with within-group reductions in carotid-femoral pulse wave, and increase in absolute and relative V̇O2peak after 8 wk (HEAT: ∆−0.27 [−0.53, −0.02] m s−1, ∆0.18 [0.06, 0.29] L·min−1, ∆2.18 [0.60, 3.76] mL·kg−1·min−1, respectively; HEATEX: ∆−0.33 [−0.58, −0.09], ∆0.21 [0.11, 0.32] L·min−1, ∆2.59 [1.06, 4.12] mL·kg−1·min−1, respectively), but no between-group differences were observed (P = 0.25, P = 0.21, and P = 0.55, respectively). There was also a within-group decrease in body fat percentage with EX (∆−1.37 [−2.45, −0.29] %), but no changes in leg strength in any of the groups (P = 0.79). Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial is the first to examine the efficacy of lower limb heating against traditionally prescribed exercise training. In our young cohort, 8 wk of training and/or therapy was insufficient to improve vascular function. More intense protocols and longer interventions involving lower limb heating may be required to elicit improvements in health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF