Search

Purpose: Non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) is a common problem in children. Antimuscarinics have been widely used as first-line medical treatment. However, their frequent side effects necessitate searching for therapeutic alternatives. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the beta 3 agonist, mirabegron., Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial enrolled child with non-neurogenic OAB refractory to behavioral urotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either Mirabegron 25/50 mg based on a 40-kg body weight cutoff or solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed using Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System questionnaire (DVSS), 3-day voiding diary and uroflowmetry. Vital signs and adverse effects were recorded at baseline and follow-up. The study primary endpoint was ≥50% reduction of the baseline DVSS., Results: Among 128 patients screened, 72 patients (36 in each group) completed the study with a mean age of 9.2±2.3 years. Both groups had significant improvement of DVSS and voiding diary (p<0.001) at 12 weeks. In mirabegron group, 94.4% (34/36) had greater than 50% improvement of DVSS compared to 75% (27/36) of solifenacin group (P=0.02). Complete symptom resolution was observed in 22.2% (8/36) patients on mirabegron versus 8.3% (3/36) on solifenacin (P=0.1). Patients on mirabegron had less adverse effects (19.4% vs 47.2%; p=0.01)., Conclusion: Mirabegron is more effective with fewer adverse effects than solifenacin for treatment of children with OAB. Mirabegron treatment improves daytime symptoms and nocturnal enuresis with less risk of constipation. It may be considered as first-line pharmacotherapy in this patient population., Competing Interests: None declared., (Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.)

Background: Balancing the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains clinically challenging. Questions regarding the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after TAVR still need to be definitively answered., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs after TAVR in individuals with and without indication for anticoagulation., Search Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP on 7 October 2023 together with reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies., Selection Criteria: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NOACs versus antiplatelet therapy or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after TAVR in adults with or without an indication for anticoagulation., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard Cochrane methods and conducted random-effects pair-wise analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence., Main Results: We included four RCTs with 4808 participants in the NMA. Of these, one compared rivaroxaban versus antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; one compared apixaban versus antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation or versus VKA in people with an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; one compared edoxaban versus VKA in people with an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR; and one compared edoxaban with antiplatelet therapy in people without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR. The mean age of trial participants was 81 years. Follow-up duration ranged from 6 to 18 months. Overall, we judged the risk of bias in the included trials to be low in all domains except for blinding, which was assessed as high in all four studies. No studies evaluated dabigatran. In people without an indication for anticoagulation, rivaroxaban and apixaban may increase all-cause mortality after TAVR as compared to antiplatelet therapy (rivaroxaban: risk ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 2.46; studies = 1, participants = 1644; moderate-certainty evidence; apixaban: RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.02; studies = 1, participants = 1049; low-certainty evidence), while edoxaban may result in little or no difference (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.27 to 9.36; studies = 1, participants = 229; low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests little or no difference between rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular mortality (rivaroxaban: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.10; studies = 1, participants = 1644; apixaban: RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.65; studies = 1, participants = 1049; edoxaban: RR 7.44, 95% CI 0.39 to 142.38; studies = 1, participants = 229) and between rivaroxaban or edoxaban and antiplatelets in stroke (rivaroxaban: RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.00; studies = 1, participants = 1644; edoxaban: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.15 to 7.42; studies = 1, participants = 229). While rivaroxaban versus antiplatelets probably increases major bleeding after TAVR (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.65; studies = 1, participants = 1644; moderate-certainty evidence), there may be little or no difference between apixaban and antiplatelet therapy (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.64; studies = 1, participants = 1049; low-certainty evidence). It is unclear if edoxaban has an effect on major bleeding, although the point estimate suggests increased bleeding (versus antiplatelets: RR 2.13, 95% CI 0.54 to 8.30; studies = 1, participants = 229; low-certainty evidence). In people with an indication for anticoagulation, low-certainty evidence suggests apixaban or edoxaban may result in little to no difference in our predefined primary efficacy outcomes after TAVR when compared to VKA (all-cause mortality: apixaban: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.77; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.20; studies = 1, participants = 1426; cardiovascular mortality: apixaban: RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.70; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.57; studies = 1, participants = 1426; stroke: apixaban: RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.70; studies = 1, participants = 451; edoxaban: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.34; studies = 1, participants = 1426). While apixaban may result in a similar rate of bleeding as VKA in this population, edoxaban probably increases major bleeding after TAVR in people with an indication for anticoagulation (apixaban: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.54; studies = 1, participants = 451; low-certainty evidence; edoxaban: RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.93; studies = 1, participants = 1426; moderate-certainty evidence)., Authors' Conclusions: In people without an indication for oral anticoagulation, rivaroxaban and apixaban may increase all-cause mortality when compared to antiplatelet therapy, while edoxaban may result in little or no difference. There might be little or no difference between rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular mortality, and between rivaroxaban or edoxaban and antiplatelets in stroke. While rivaroxaban probably increases major bleeding following TAVR, there might be little or no difference between apixaban and antiplatelet therapy, and the effect of edoxaban on major bleeding remains unclear. In people with an indication for anticoagulation, apixaban and edoxaban may be as effective as VKA in preventing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke. Apixaban may lead to a similar rate of major bleeding as VKA in this population. However, edoxaban probably increases major bleeding following TAVR when compared to VKA. Our NMA did not show superiority of one NOAC over another for any of the primary outcomes. Head-to-head trials directly comparing NOACs against each other are required to increase the certainty of the evidence., (Copyright © 2025 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Despite proven efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), data on patients with AF and valvular heart disease remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate the DOACs compared with warfarin among patients with AF and valvular heart disease., Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥18 years of age, who had AF and valvular heart disease, and were new users of DOACs or warfarin. The primary effectiveness outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding for safety. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression after propensity score matching to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. In the matched cohort, DOAC use (versus warfarin) was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81]) and bleeding (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.80]). We found a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62-0.89]) and apixaban (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.74]) but not dabigatran (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.26]). We found a lower rate of bleeding with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68]), dabigatran (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.97]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05-0.83]). We were unable to obtain estimates for the effectiveness outcome with edoxaban due to the small number of events., Conclusions: In this study of patients with AF and valvular heart disease, DOAC treatment was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding compared with warfarin.

Background: Randomized clinical trials demonstrated similar efficacy and improved safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Long-term data in routine clinical practice are needed., Hypothesis: Patients with AF receiving edoxaban at baseline continue to have low annualized effectiveness and safety event rates in the second year of follow-up, with regional variations observed., Methods: The Global ETNA-AF program is a prospective, noninterventional study of patients with AF receiving edoxaban. Patient characteristics and annualized clinical event rates were assessed overall and by region across the 2-year follow-up. Annualized event rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events were assessed within the first year and conditionally in patients who were event-free up to 12 months in the second year., Results: This analysis comprised 26 805 patients from Europe (n = 13 164), Japan (n = 10 342), and non-Japanese Asian regions (n = 3299). Patients from Europe had the highest burden of comorbidities. The annualized event rates for major bleeding, any stroke, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death varied by region. The global annualized event rates in the first and second year were 1.31%/year and 0.86%/year for major bleeding, 1.06%/year and 0.65%/year for any stroke, 0.84%/year and 0.73%/year for cardiovascular death, and 3.05%/year and 3.18%/year for all-cause death., Conclusion: Annualized event rates for any stroke and major bleeding remained low through 2-year follow-up for patients with AF receiving edoxaban at baseline. Differences in annualized event rates for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between Europe, Japan, and non-Japanese Asian regions may reflect variations in baseline characteristics., Trial Registration: Europe, NCT02944019; Japan, UMIN000017011; Korea/Taiwan, NCT02951039; Hong Kong, NCT03247582; and Thailand, NCT03247569., (© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Zandelisib, a selective, potent PI3Kδ inhibitor, demonstrated favourable outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma in a global phase II study. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zandelisib for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma. Sixty-one patients received zandelisib orally at 60 mg daily continuously in the first two 28-day cycles, followed by intermittent dosing on Days 1-7 following each cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Objective and complete response rates were 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.7%-85.5%) and 24.6% (95% CI, 14.5%-37.3%) respectively. Median time to response was 58 days; 70.5% (43/61) of patients achieved their first response by Week 8. At least one Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) occurred in 55.7% of patients: transaminase elevation (8.2%); cutaneous reactions (3.3%); and diarrhoea, enterocolitis and lung infection (1.6% each), defined as adverse events of special interest. The discontinuation rate due to any TEAE was 14.8%. No zandelisib-related death occurred. Zandelisib showed favourable efficacy and tolerability in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. This unique dosing schedule may maintain efficacy while mitigating the safety issues observed with other PI3Kδ inhibitors (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04533581)., (© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Alpelisib is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α) mutation. In recent years a number of adverse effects have been observed to be associated with this therapy, the most notable of which is hyperglycemia. A literature search was conducted to include case studies, case series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses within the last 10 years that evaluated patients with PIK3CA- mutated hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Hyperglycemia was a notable adverse effect that was found in the majority of patients without preexisting diabetes mellitus. Patients with hyperglycemia were in the high-risk groups of advanced age, prediabetes mellitus or history of insulin resistance, increased body mass index, increased blood monocyte count, and increased hemoglobin A1c (glycated hemoglobin). Hyperglycemia was manageable with antihyperglycemic agents and dose modification/discontinuation of alpelisib with no severe progression. Other notable adverse effects were rash, stomatitis, diarrhea, pneumonitis, reduced appetite, elevated liver enzymes, nausea, fatigue, and rare reports of diabetic ketoacidosis. This literature review aims to highlight the incidence and risk factors of alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia in greater depth.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare acquired disorder where thrombopoietin-receptor agonists have become mainstays of ITP treatment. With the recent approval of avatrombopag (AVA), real-world studies are essential to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Our study of 66 adult ITP patients treated with AVA showed a high response rate. After starting AVA, 74.2% did not require rescue medications, with minimal adverse effects. Additionally, 56.0% of patients reduced other ITP medications, and all patients aged ≥65 years responded to AVA. Results should be confirmed in larger studies, but AVA appears to be an effective and safe treatment for ITP patients., (© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Trials comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) versus antiplatelet-based strategies have shown a reduction of subclinical leaflet thrombosis at the cost of increased mortality and major-bleedings. NOACs were often combined with antiplatelet therapy., Aims: The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) study aimed to evaluate the impact of edoxaban monotherapy on the incidence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and reduced leaflet motion (RLM) and to evaluate safety in terms of mortality, thromboembolic events and major bleeding., Methods: The REDOX study is a single-arm, open-label trial including patients after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with no formal indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients received edoxaban monotherapy for 3 months, followed by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HALT. Clinical follow-up continued up to 1 year after TAVI., Results: We included 58 patients, of which 50 reached study completion including MSCT scanning and eight withdrew consent before end of study. At 3-months follow-up, HALT of any grade was detected in 12.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0%-23.1%) of patients. HALT grade ≥ 3 occurred in 4.0% (95% CI: 0.8%-12.2%) of patients. At 1 year follow-up, all patients were alive and free of disabling strokes. Three patients had a non-disabling stroke and one patient had a major bleeding., Conclusions: In the REDOX study, edoxaban monotherapy after TAVI was associated with a 12.0% incidence of any HALT and a 4.0% incidence of HALT grade ≥ 3. HALT was not associated with clinical events., (© 2024 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Epistaxis is common with antithrombotic therapy and is often troublesome to patients, yet its frequency, severity, and outcomes are poorly characterized., Methods and Results: Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) randomized 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 risk score ≥2 to higher-dose edoxaban regimen (60 mg daily, dose-reduced to 30 mg), lower-dose edoxaban regimen (30 mg, dose reduced to 15 mg, daily), or warfarin. Bleeds were adjudicated using International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up were excluded; those with >1 bleeding event were categorized according to their most severe event. The safety cohort with interval censoring during drug interruption was analyzed. Proportions were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and treatment arms were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Among 5247 patients with a bleeding event, 1008 (19.2%) had epistaxis and 4239 (80.8%) had nonepistaxis bleeding. Epistaxis events were less severe than nonepistaxis bleeds (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major: 3.2% versus 20.7%; clinically relevant nonmajor: 64.7% versus 60.1%; minor: 32.1% versus 19.2%; P <0.001). Permanent drug discontinuation was similar following epistaxis versus nonepistaxis bleeding in patients with major (59.4% versus 53.6%; P =0.52) or clinically relevant nonmajor (32.5% versus 33.3%; P =0.70) bleeding but was significantly higher in patients with minor epistaxis versus other minor bleeds (33.3% versus 23.9%; P =0.001). Compared with warfarin, higher-dose edoxaban regimen had similar risk of epistaxis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.95-1.26]), whereas lower-dose edoxaban regimen conferred reduced risk (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.86])., Conclusions: Epistaxis was frequent, and despite being overall less severe than nonepistaxis bleeding, was associated with similar rates of anticoagulant discontinuation. Compared with warfarin, lower-dose edoxaban regimen reduced the risk of epistaxis by 27% whereas higher-dose edoxaban regimen had no effect., Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00781391.

Background: The patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at high risk for developing ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to identify the optimal DOAC based on both adverse events in upper gastrointestinal ESD., Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan. We included patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD between 2012 and 2021. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke occurring after upper gastrointestinal ESD and delayed bleeding in gastroduodenal and esophageal ESD. Inverse probability weightings were applied to balance the four DOAC groups (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the outcomes., Results: We analyzed 9729 patients on a DOAC undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD. Ischemic stroke developed after upper gastrointestinal ESD in 1.4%, 0.7%, 0.6%, and 0.8% of patients taking dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively, after weighting. Rivaroxaban and apixaban showed significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with dabigatran (odds ratio, 0.15 and 0.12, respectively) in standard doses. The delayed bleeding developed after gastroduodenal ESD in 7.6%, 14.6%, 19.2%, and 17.3% of patients taking each DOAC, respectively, with the lowest risk in dabigatran, followed by rivaroxaban. A similar pattern was observed in delayed bleeding in esophageal ESD (3.2%, 5.4%, 7.5%, and 5.5% in each DOAC), but with no significant results., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban might be an optimal DOAC for upper gastrointestinal ESD showing a lower risk for both ischemic stroke and delayed bleeding., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: All authors have no conflicts of interest to be declared. Patient consent for publication: Not required., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the 3-year continuation rate and discontinuation factors between vibegron and mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder in a rehabilitation hospital in Japan., Methods: The 3-year continuation rate of the target drugs and reasons for discontinuation as well as patients' backgrounds and adverse effects were evaluated retrospectively from the medical records between September 2018 and December 2020. After selecting patients according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 136 cases taking mirabegron and 82 taking vibegron were adjusted for intergroup variability by propensity score matching. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression for the 3-year continuation rate and Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression for the 3-year cumulative incidence of discontinuation events. Subgroup analysis was also performed., Results: Approximately 70% of the patients analyzed had neurogenic overactive bladder. The 3-year continuation rate was 65.2% in vibegron and 30.3% in mirabegron, and the hazard ratio was 0.41 (95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.68, p < 0.001) as for an incidence of discontinuation events of vibegron against mirabegron. The incidence of discontinuation due to inadequate efficacy was 22.7% in vibegron and 47.0% in mirabegron, and similarly the hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.80, p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, vibegron continued significantly more than mirabegron for the 3-year continuation rate in non-neurogenic overactive bladder (p < 0.001), in spontaneous voiding (p < 0.001), in anticholinergic combination (p = 0.0017), in female (p < 0.001), and in 70 years or older (p = 0.0028). Additionally, a significant interaction was observed regarding the methods of emptying urine (p = 0.0066)., Conclusions: Vibegron was superior to mirabegron in the 3-year continuation rate of administration with a fewer discontinuation due to inadequate efficacy in a patient population with relatively high rates of neurogenic overactive bladder., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with factor Xa inhibitors in a real-world setting., Methods: The present study was a multicentre and observational study that included patients with AF who were treated with factor Xa inhibitors. The primary outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality., Results: A total of 1162 patients from 26 cardiology centers were included in this study, with a median age of 72 years. During the median 12-month follow-up period, the primary outcome occurred in 195 patients (16.8%). Treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban and edoxaban showed a lower rate of ischemic stroke, TIA, and/or systemic embolism (2.2% vs. 4.7% vs. 6.5%, respectively, p = 0.014). The major bleeding rate was similar between all three factor Xa inhibitors. The all-cause mortality rate in the rivaroxaban group was lower compared with the apixaban and edoxaban groups (9.8% vs. 15.1% vs. 12.4%, respectively, p = 0.042). Overall, the frequency of primary outcome was 13.8%, 19.6%, and 20.6% for patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively (p = 0.019). Older age, male sex, low body weight, high bleeding risk, heart failure, hypertension, liver failure, and treatment with apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. were independently associated with the development of primary outcome., Conclusion: The follow-up data from the ANATOLIA-AF study provides detailed data about the incidence and independent predictors of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with factor Xa inhibitor treatment., (© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is challenging, often resulting in chemotherapy treatment delays, dose reduction, and treatment interruption. Randomized trials support the potential efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in CIT management. A phase III trial of avatrombopag (AVA) demonstrated increased platelet counts (PC) in patients with solid tumours experiencing CIT. To complement those findings, this case series of six patients with solid tumours and CIT is presented. Results from these cases support the clinical benefit of AVA in improving PC and reducing the impact of CIT on tumour treatment, allowing continued therapy without dose reduction or treatment interruption., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Mirabegron, the first-in-class beta-3 agonist, is the mainstay medication for overactive bladder (OAB). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of generic drugs of mirabegron (Mirabek ® ) in adults diagnosed with OAB through a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional observational study., Materials and Methods: Adult patients with OAB prescribed Mirabek ® SR Tab. 50 mg for the first time were recruited from hospitals between September 2021 and September 2022. Participants underwent baseline registration followed by two follow-ups at 4- and 8-week intervals. Data on demographics, medical history, OAB symptoms, vital signs, medication administration, and adverse events were collected., Results: Among 1,714 patients, Mirabek ® SR Tab. 50 mg effectively improved OAB symptoms over an 8-week treatment period, with significant differences in symptom improvement between baseline and both 4- and 8-week time points as well as between 4 weeks and 8 weeks. The incidence rate of adverse events was 0.70%; most cases were mild with no severe reactions., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Mirabek ® , a generic drug of betmiga, is an effective and safe treatment option for adults with OAB. Furthermore, the introduction of generic drug reduced the costs of prescription drugs and expanded the opportunity for many patients to access mirabegron., Competing Interests: Moon-Hwa Park is an employee of Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Jee Soo Park is supported by a grant from the Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which had no influence on the present work. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (© The Korean Urological Association.)

Edoxaban is an orally active inhibitor of activated factor X (FXa). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses were performed to characterize the PK and PK-PD relationships of edoxaban in pediatric patients to identify the covariates that may contribute to inter-subject variability in PK and PD of edoxaban in pediatric patients, and to compare the PK and PD data between pediatric and adult patients. The pediatric PK of edoxaban was best described by a two-compartment model with transit compartments, first-order oral absorption, and linear elimination. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body weight, and post-menstrual age were the significant covariates explaining variability in edoxaban PK among pediatric patients. A function based on renal maturation was applied to edoxaban clearance. The clearance for a 70 kg patient with an eGFR of 110 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was estimated to be 42.9 L/h (CV ~ 31.8%). PK simulation showed that exposures across five pediatric age groups were comparable to that in adult patients receiving 60 mg once daily dose. The PK-PD relationship for anti-factor Xa was best fit with an E max (8.65 IU/mL) model with an EC 50 of 631 ng/mL. The PK-PD relationships for activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were best fit with linear models (slopes of 0.0467, and 0.0415 s mL/ng, respectively). In addition, due to the small number of efficacy and safety events, an exploratory analysis did not detect a correlation between efficacy events (recurrent venous thromboembolism) or safety events (clinically relevant bleeding) and edoxaban exposure., (© 2024 The Author(s). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Octylisothiazolinone (OIT; CAS 26530-20-1) is used as a biocide in leather products., Objectives: To report several cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from the use of headphones containing OIT, and to highlight the strong allergic potential of this preservative., Patients and Methods: Four patients with ACD from headphones were patched tested using the European baseline, cosmetic, rubber, plastics/glues and acrylates series. Patients were also tested to different parts of their own headphones ('as is'). Chemical analyses of the headphones was additionally performed with Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)., Results: All patients had developed localised ACD to the contact sites of the headphones, except for one patient who developed 'angioedema-like' dermatitis. All patients were shown to have been primarily sensitised to OIT. UPLC-MS/MS analysis confirmed OIT in the leather ear pads of the headphones., Conclusions: OIT is a relevant and strong sensitizer in leather, and may cause severe ACD. Safer use concentrations (limits) of OIT, as well as product labelling in the leather industry, may be required to ensure a better protection of consumers., (© 2024 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction and Aim: The main categories of drugs employed for medical expulsive therapy in patients with ureteral calculi (UC) are alpha-blockers (α-B) and beta-adrenoceptor agonists. This meta-analysis evaluated the safety and effectiveness of α-B versus mirabegron (MIR) in treating UC., Methods: From January 1980 to October 2024, we extensively searched the Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of α-B and MIR in managing UC. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out., Results: The meta-analysis included six publications with 592 patients, comparing α-B with MIR. The stone expulsion rate (SER) was found to be significantly greater in the α-B group than in the MIR group, as indicated by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 2.16, P = 0.03) in the meta-analysis. However, no significant differences were found between the α-B group and the MIR group for stone expulsion time (SET) (mean difference [MD]: 1.20; 95% CI, -2.71 to 5.10; P = 0.55), pain episodes (PE) (MD: 0.36; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.76; P = 0.07), or analgesic requirements (MD: 0.79; 95% CI, -0.37 to 1.94; P = 0.18). The α-B group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of adverse events compared to the MIR group for orthostatic hypotension (OR 12.16, 95% CI 3.36 to 43.95, P = 0.0001), headache (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.41 to 8.49, P = 0.007), and retrograde ejaculation (OR 16.30, 95% CI 5.87 to 45.31, P < 0.00001). While in the dizziness (OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.09, p = 0.28), it made no difference., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis identified a substantial enhancement in the SER among patients with UC who received α-B therapy instead of those who were administered MIR therapy. Nonetheless, α-B therapy was connected to an increased risk of adverse events., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, ID CRD42024595934., Competing Interests: Not applicable., (Copyright: © 2024 Yan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of methylisothiazolinone sensitivity and associated factors in individuals with suspected allergic contact dermatitis., Methods: Cross-sectional study based on patch tests, including methylisothiazolinone 0.2%, in 286 participants with suspected allergic contact dermatitis, in Brasília/DF, Brazil, between March/2020 and March/2022., Results: 13.6% of participants were diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis and sensitive to MI. The mean age was 43.7 years, and the majority were women (71,8%). The average duration of the disease was 60 months. The most common location was hands (76.9%) and upper limbs (33.3%). In 97.4%, allergy to methylisothiazolinone was considered of current relevance. In the multivariate model, being domestic/household increased the chance of presenting sensitivity to MI by 4.2 (95% CI= 1.36 - 13.5). Presenting lesions in several places of the body was also significantly associated (OR=2.84; CI 95%=1.17 - 6.86) to be sensitive to the test substance., Conclusion: The findings confirm the epidemic of allergy to methylisothiazolinone. They reinforce the need for the inclusion of this isolated substance in the Brazilian baseline series. We emphasize the need for regulations on the use of methylisothiazolinone in industrial products and household detergents, as is done for cosmetics. Studies in other centers are needed to confirm these results.

Purpose: Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1- mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC experience is reported here., Methods: An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label., Results: Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2- ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status., Conclusion: Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2- ABC.

Background: Despite consistent recommendations from clinical guidelines, data from randomized trials on a long-term antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease are still lacking., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-masked, randomized trial comparing edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease (defined as coronary artery disease previously treated with revascularization or managed medically). The risk of stroke was assessed on the basis of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, and major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major ischemic events and the safety outcome of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding., Results: We assigned 524 patients to the edoxaban monotherapy group and 516 patients to the dual antithrombotic therapy group at 18 sites in South Korea. The mean age of the patients was 72.1 years, 22.9% were women, and the mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 4.3. At 12 months, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 34 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.8%) assigned to edoxaban monotherapy and in 79 patients (16.2%) assigned to dual antithrombotic therapy (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.65; P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of major ischemic events at 12 months appeared to be similar in the trial groups. Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 23 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 4.7%) in the edoxaban monotherapy group and in 70 patients (14.2%) in the dual antithrombotic therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.53)., Conclusions: In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months than dual antithrombotic therapy. (Funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation and others; EPIC-CAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03718559.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader, plus fulvestrant showed efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are available in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor setting. BYLieve aimed to assess alpelisib plus endocrine therapy in this setting in three cohorts defined by immediate previous treatment; here, we report results from cohort A., Methods: This ongoing, phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer with tumour PIK3CA mutation, following progression on or after previous therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, from 114 study locations (cancer centres, medical centres, university hospitals, and hospitals) in 18 countries worldwide. Participants aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, with no more than two previous anticancer treatments and no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled in three cohorts. In cohort A, patients must have had progression on or after a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor as the immediate previous treatment. Patients received oral alpelisib 300 mg/day (continuously) plus fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and on day 15 of cycle 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive without disease progression at 6 months per local assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, in patients with a centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03056755., Findings: Between Aug 14, 2017, and Jul 29, 2022 (data cutoff), 127 patients with at least 18 months' follow-up were enrolled into cohort A. 119 patients had a centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 21·8 months (IQR 10·8-37·6). 64 (53·8%; 95% CI 44·4-63·0) of 119 patients were alive without disease progression at 6 months. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were hyperglycaemia (37 [29%] of 127 patients), rash (13 [10%]), and rash maculopapular (11 [9%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 37 (29%) of 127 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported., Interpretation: BYLieve showed activity of alpelisib plus fulvestrant with manageable toxicity in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor., Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HSR reports research support to the University of California San Francisco from Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Genentech, OBI, Odonate, Daiichi, Eisai, Seattle Genetics, MacroGenics, Sermonix, and Immunomedics; a limited consulting role with Samsung; honoraria from Puma and Mylan; and travel support from Daiichi, Mylan, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and MacroGenics. FL reports consulting for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genomic Health, and Eli Lilly; and travel support from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Laboratories Pierre Fabre. EC reports honoraria, and consulting and paid speakers’ bureaus for Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Roche; and travel support from Roche and Pfizer. PD reports research funding from Roche and Novartis. YHP reports grants from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eli Lilly; grants and personal fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, Eisai, and Novartis; grants and non-financial support from Pfizer; and personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, outside the submitted work. AP reports immediate family member employee of Novartis; personal honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, and Amgen; consultant for Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, Daiichi Sankyo, and AbbVie; institutional honorarium from Nanostring Technologies; institutional research funding from Roche, Novartis, Incyte, and Puma; patents on HER2 and chemoendocrine score predictors; travel support from Daiichi Sankyo; an advisory role with Oncolytics and consultancy for Peptomyc; and is the founder of Reveal Genomics. TB reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche; and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. DJ reports personal fees from Novartis, Genentech, Eisai, Ipsen, and EMD Serono, during the conduct of the study. NT reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Bicycle Therapeutics, Taiho, Zeno Pharmaceuticals, Repare Therapeutics; and research funding from AstraZeneca, BioRad, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Clovis, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Guardant Health. NS reports employment at Novartis. JPZ reports employment at and stock ownership in Novartis. JPZ's wife is employed by Johnson & Johnson. CA and Y-MS report employment at Novartis. ST reports employment at and stock ownership in Novartis. HK and W-CH reports consulting agreements and research funding for the conduct of this study from Novartis. SC reports grants and personal fees from Novartis and Pfizer; and personal fees from Eli Lilly, during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from Hoffmann LaRoche, AstraZeneca, and Genomic Health, outside the submitted work. MR-B and PN declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Residents of nursing homes are usually excluded from clinical trials, including trials to assess treatments for common conditions such as nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aimed to quantify the real-world comparative safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin among nursing home residents with NVAF., Design: Retrospective cohort study using 100% national Minimum Data Set and linked Medicare claims from January 2011 through December 2018., Setting and Participants: Long-term care nursing home residents aged ≥66 years enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare. We included individuals diagnosed with NVAF newly initiating oral anticoagulants., Methods: We identified exposure to DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) vs warfarin. Outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, pneumonia (negative control outcome), and all-cause death. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting competing risk regression models for clinical outcomes and Cox proportional hazards regression for all-cause death., Results: Of 38,983 individuals newly initiating anticoagulants, 19,366 (49.7%) initiated DOACs and 19,617 (50.3%) initiated warfarin. In the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, compared with warfarin, there was no statistically significant association between DOAC use and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism [4.5 vs 4.7 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05] or major bleeding (12.6 vs 12.4 events per 100 person-years; aHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.10). DOACs use was associated with a modest but statistically significant lower risk of all-cause death (48.1 vs 49.0 events per 100 person-years; IPTW analysis aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98)., Conclusions and Implications: Among nursing home residents with NVAF, DOACs and warfarin were associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. However, the use of DOACs was associated with a slightly reduced risk of all-cause mortality., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr Alexander is past Chair of FDA's Peripheral and Central Nervous System Advisory Committee and a co-founding principal and equity holder in Stage Analytics. These arrangements have been reviewed and approved by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Real-world data on clinical characteristics and outcomes related to the use of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is lacking., Methods:  The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE from 31 centers in Japan from January 2015 to August 2020. Our study population comprised 1,197 patients with active cancer who were divided into the edoxaban ( N  = 643, 54%), rivaroxaban ( N  = 297, 25%), and apixaban ( N  = 257, 22%) groups., Results:  The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE (9.3, 10.2, and 8.5%, respectively, p  = 0.82) and all-cause death (67.5, 66.8, and 63.8%, respectively, p  = 0.22) did not differ among the groups. Despite adjusting for confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than those in the other groups (22.6, 14.0, and 22.8%, p  = 0.04; and 37.6, 26.8, and 38.3%, p  = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, in the rivaroxaban group, the risk for major bleeding was numerically lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.01) and that of clinically relevant all bleeding was significantly lower (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92) than those in the edoxaban group., Conclusion:  The risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the different DOACs ; however, the risk of bleeding events could differ, with a potentially lower risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban., Competing Interests: Y.Y. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo, and grant support from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi-Sankyo. T.M. reports lecturer's fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Kyocera, Novartis, and Toray; manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; advisory board for Sanofi. Y.N. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo. K.K. received lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo. N.I. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. S.I. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Y.O. received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Daiichi-Sankyo, and research funds from Bayer Healthcare and Daiichi-Sankyo. K.T. received significant research grant from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Bristol-Myers K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and scholarship fund from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and honoraria from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and belongs to the endowed departments donated by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one, Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd., ITI Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd., NIPRO CORPORATION, TERUMO Co, Ltd., Abbott Medical Co., Ltd., Cardinal Health Japan, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Medical Appliance Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this article to disclose., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a medical condition characterized by forming a blood clot, or thrombus, in one of the deep veins, typically in the legs. It is a type of venous thromboembolism, which refers to the formation of blood clots in the veins. It is caused by Virchow's triad (stasis, hypercoagulation, and endothelial injury)., Objective: Our main objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and edoxaban in treating lower extremity DVT., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 406 patients subjected to DVT treatment using direct oral anticoagulants (edoxaban and rivaroxaban) at our hospital. We recruited adult patients (aged 18 years and more) diagnosed with lower extremity DVT and received treatment with either rivaroxaban or edoxaban as the primary anticoagulant therapy for DVT. We excluded patients who received treatment with other anticoagulant medications (warfarin and heparin) as the primary therapy for DVT., Results: The groups showed statistically significant differences in red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels, with the edoxaban group having high values. However, the 2 groups observed no statistically significant differences in creatinine clearance, white blood cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels. The difference in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). The edoxaban group had fewer pulmonary embolism patients than the rivaroxaban group. The reduction in recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the major bleeding at various sites across the 2 treatment groups (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetic profile includes rapid absorption and a relatively short half-life. It means that once administered, rivaroxaban quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood and is subsequently eliminated from the body within a relatively short period. Edoxaban's pharmacokinetic profile may include slower absorption and a longer half-life than rivaroxaban. It can result in a slower rate of achieving peak concentration and a more prolonged presence in the bloodstream. These results emphasize the need for careful consideration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with underlying cancer and underscore the importance of managing risks while providing adequate anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Alpelisib plus fulvestrant demonstrated a significant progression-free survival benefit versus fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) (SOLAR-1). Hyperglycemia, an on-target adverse effect of PI3Kα inhibition, can lead to dose modifications, potentially impacting alpelisib efficacy. We report data from preclinical models and two clinical trials (SOLAR-1 and BYLieve) on Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use to improve PI3Kα inhibitor-associated hyperglycemia., Methods: Healthy Brown Norway (BN), mild diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF), and Rat1-myr-p110α/HBRX3077 tumor-bearing nude rats treated with alpelisib were analyzed for glucose and insulin control with metformin and dapagliflozin (SGLT2i) and alpelisib efficacy. Hyperglycemia adverse events (AEs) were compared between patients receiving SGLT2i with alpelisib (n = 19) and a propensity score-matched cohort not receiving SGLT2i (n = 74) in both trials., Results: Dapagliflozin and metformin in BN and ZDF rats treated with alpelisib normalized blood glucose and reduced insulin levels. No signs of ketosis or drug-drug interaction were observed when metformin and dapagliflozin was administered with alpelisib. Alpelisib antitumor efficacy was maintained when used with dapagliflozin in tumor-bearing rats. Compared with a matched set of patients without SGLT2i, patients receiving SGLT2i had 4.9 and 6.4 times lower rates of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia AEs and hyperglycemia AEs resulting in alpelisib dose adjustments, interruptions, or withdrawals, respectively, and a relative reduction in risk of experiencing these AEs (70.6% and 35.7%)., Conclusion: These data suggest adding an SGLT2i can effectively manage hyperglycemia, resulting in fewer alpelisib dose modifications and discontinuations in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2- ABC (SOLAR-1: NCT02437318; BYLieve: NCT03056755)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The pediatric clinical development programs of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran have recently been completed, with apixaban close to the finish line. One common pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristic of these four DOACs is that renal excretion contributes 27% or more in their elimination, resulting in age-dependent drug clearance in both pediatric and adult subjects. Several lessons have been learned from adult exposure matching and pediatric dose selection for DOACs. The main goal of this tutorial is to provide an informed perspective on pediatric dose selection for renally excreted drugs, using these four DOACs as case examples. This tutorial is organized into seven steps: (1) consideration of age-related differences in disease and response to treatment; (2) consideration of age-related differences in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion; (3) selection of the reference adult population and exposure for pediatric exposure matching; (4) prediction of pediatric clearance and pediatric dose selection based on data from young adults; (5) conduct and design of efficient pediatric PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies that inform dose selection; (6) assessment of exposure matching and dose adjustment using population PK simulation; (7) evaluation of the need for dose adjustment in pediatric sub-populations., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) are inflammatory skin conditions whose association is not clearly defined., Objectives: To identify differences in ACD profile between patients with and without AD among those referred for patch testing. Additionally, to determine the prevalence of sensitisation to standard Spanish contact allergens in both groups., Methods: We analysed two groups (AD and non-AD) within the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy (REIDAC). Contact allergy, clinical relevance and epidemiological data were compared between them., Results: A total of 5055 patients were included. Among them, 23% (1168) had a history or final diagnosis of AD. At least one positive reaction was seen in 468 (40%) of AD patients and 1864 (48%) of non-AD patients. In both groups, the most common positive reactions were to nickel sulphate, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and cobalt chloride. Age-adjusted OR for sensitisation to nickel sulphate was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61-0.86), indicating a decreased likelihood of sensitisation in AD patients compared to non-AD individuals., Conclusions: We did not find an increased presence of ACD in patients with AD referred for patch testing, exhibiting similar profiles to non-AD population, except for a negative relationship between AD and sensitisation to nickel sulphate., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, commonly used direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), are widely used to prevent and treat stroke and venous thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess and compare reports of adverse events associated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, including hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic events., Methods: Reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Medications and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and the information component (IC) were used to perform a risk assessment of adverse event reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for the years 2018-2022., Results: Combined with disproportionality analysis in different backgrounds, the salient risks of the three-factor Xa inhibitors varied. Rivaroxaban had the most significant risk of hemorrhage, apixaban had a higher incidence and risk of death, cardiac and cerebral adverse events, and edoxaban showed a more prominent risk in the kidneys and urinary system., Conclusion: Hemorrhage is a common risk with factor Xa inhibitors, with rivaroxaban being the most significant. Apixaban and edoxaban also showed significant association with non-hemorrhagic adverse events, and increased attention to non-hemorrhagic adverse events is needed in clinical use.

Purpose: Alpelisib is a PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-kinases) inhibitor used for breast cancer which develops hyperglycemia based on its action on glucose metabolism regulation. This study aims to identify potential risk factors predicting hyperglycemia development and the need for multiple treatments for hyperglycemia in patients receiving Alpelisib., Methods: Fourteen women diagnosed with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer carrying PI3K mutations who initiated treatment with Alpelisib were monitored through consultations in the Oncology and Endocrinology departments. Non-parametric ROC curves were generated to assess the need for three or more antidiabetic medications to achieve glycemic control., Results: The study population had a median age of 64 years (range:48-69) with a median body mass index (BMI) of 26.6 kg/m 2 (range: 22.9-29.4). Overweight was observed in 35.7% of the participants and obesity in 21.4%. Fifty percent of the participants had prediabetes, and 85.7% developed hyperglycemia requiring pharmacological treatment, although none of them needed to discontinue treatment for this reason. Baseline C-peptide levels and BMI were associated with the number of antidiabetic drugs used (Spearman's Rho 0.553, p = 0.040; Spearman's Rho 0.581, p = 0.030, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.819 for the variable risk profile (defined as baseline C-peptide >10.5 ng/ml and BMI > 27 kg/m 2 ), whereas AUC values were 0.556 and 0.514 for HbA1c and baseline glucose, respectively, (p = 0.012)., Conclusion: A joint follow-up by an Oncology department and a Diabetes Unit can prevent treatment discontinuation in patients under Alpelisib therapy. Baseline BMI and plasma C-peptide levels can predict an increased need for anti-hyperglycemic treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The prospective, single-arm, observational, phase 4 ETNA-AF Europe study collected real-world data about safety, effectiveness and therapeutic adherence in European patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly prescribed with edoxaban and followed up for 4 years., Methods: Overall, 13 164 patients were included in the full-analysis set, which means that they had at least one documentation after baseline at 4 years. The current paper reports about the 3329 Italian patients out of the whole European population., Results: In the Italian cohort, median age was 76.0 (69.0-82.0) years, with 57.4% of the patients being ≥75 years old. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was >4 in 586 (18.1%) patients. At baseline, 670 (20.8%) patients were classified as frail by the investigators. Edoxaban 30 mg/day was prescribed to 1013 (31.8%) patients: these were older, with more comorbidities and a lower estimated creatinine clearance compared with those receiving 60 mg/day. All-cause mortality was 4.1%/year and there were very low yearly rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events: major bleeding, 0.9%; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.2%; ischemic stroke, 0.3%; systemic embolism, <0.1%. These events were more frequent in patients ≥75 years or in patients with renal impairment or treated with edoxaban 30 mg/day. Advancing age was not associated with an increased incidence of intracranial bleeding., Conclusions: These findings confirm the favorable long-term safety and effectiveness profile of edoxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated in routine clinical care in Italy.

Background: The use of methylisothiazolinone (MI) as a preservative in cosmetic products caused an alarming increase in MI contact allergy across Europe in the 2010s. This was followed by regulations of use with a total ban on leave-on (implemented in 2017) and reduced use concentrations in rinse-off cosmetics (2018)., Objective: To follow-up on the prevalence of contact allergy to MI and the related benzisothiazolinone (BIT) and octylisothiazolinone (OIT) in consecutively patch-tested patients in Europe., Methods: A cross-sectional audit following the design of two previous audits on MI contact allergy from 1 May 2022 to 31 October 2022 included all patients patch tested with the European baseline series, including or supplemented with MI, BIT and OIT across 10 departments in eight European countries., Results: A total of 2554 patients were consecutively patch tested with the three isothiazolinones during the study period. The prevalence of MI and BIT contact allergy was 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3%-3.7%; range 1.1%-5.8%) and 3.1% (95% CI: 2.4%-3.9%; range 0.0%-6.6%), respectively; that of OIT was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4%-1.1%; range 0%-3.2%). Rinse-off cosmetic (73.3%) and leave-on cosmetic products (13.3%) were still associated with eliciting allergic contact dermatitis to MI., Conclusion: We confirmed a positive impact of regulatory measures on the prevalence of MI contact allergy in Europe, which halved compared to 2015. However, our data suggest that consumers may still be exposed to older cosmetic products containing MI. BIT has superseded MI in causing contact allergy, despite not being allowed for use in cosmetic products., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

It remains unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin in low-weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with those of warfarin in low-weight patients with AF. We extracted the July 2011-September 2022 data of patients with AF treated with a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) or warfarin at a tertiary hospital. The patients were divided into low-weight (body weight ≤ 60 kg) and non-low-weight (body weight = 60-100 kg) groups. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding, whereas the secondary outcomes were any ischemic and bleeding events. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. In total, 5,044 patients (mean age = 73.7 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3.0, mean HAS-BLED score = 2.3) were enrolled and divided into low-weight and non-low-weight groups-containing 1,666 (1,406 NOAC users, 260 warfarin users) and 3,378 (2,978 NOAC users, 400 warfarin users) patients, respectively. NOACs were associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event in the low-weight group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.73). The between-group differences in the risks of IS/SE, any ischemic event, major bleeding, and any bleeding event were nonsignificant. Thus, the use of NOACs (specifically dabigatran or edoxaban) is associated with a lower risk of any bleeding event than warfarin use in low-weight patients with AF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To report an incident of a breakthrough deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential example of a drug-drug interaction in a patient treated with edoxaban and rifabutin who was being treated for respiratory tuberculosis. Case: A 76-year-old male presented with anemia requiring transfusion and subsequent shortness of breath that was later diagnosed to be respiratory tuberculosis. He experienced a prolonged hospital stay due to persistently positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory samples and a complicated social situation that required continuous hospitalization for approximately five months. During his treatment the patient was transitioned from apixaban to edoxaban due to a drug-drug interaction with rifabutin. He subsequently had a DVT while on edoxaban after two months of therapy that would require him to transition to warfarin. Conclusion: This case represents an example of a potentially significant drug-drug interaction between edoxaban and rifabutin. Other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exhibit a potential drug-drug interaction that limit their effectiveness when used with rifamycins. This report describes the first known case of a patient experiencing a DVT after prolonged edoxaban use in combination with rifabutin. Treatment with DOACs for patients taking concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers such as rifabutin may be more complicated than previously believed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials., Methods: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding., Results: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort., Conclusions: In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs., (© 2024 BARMER Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung and The Author(s). Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) are available in addition to warfarin for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Anticoagulants are useful for practical pharmacotherapy in Asian populations, but their responses are different from those in Caucasian populations. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most useful anticoagulant using a nationwide insurance claims database in Japan. We extracted information on patients with NVAF treated with DOACs or warfarin for the first time between September 2015 and February 2018 to conduct a retrospective observational cohort study using the claims database of Japan. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) of effectiveness and safety endpoints among DOACs or warfarin after adjusting for backgrounds by propensity scores (inverse probability weighting). Using negative control outcomes, we considered renal function as an unmeasured confounding factor. After adjusting for their backgrounds, patients treated with DOACs showed higher effectiveness endpoints (stroke or systemic embolism) than those treated with warfarin (HR; 0.72-0.81) and higher safety in terms of safety end points (clinically significant bleeding) (HR; 0.80-0.88). The net clinical benefit, which reflects the actual clinical usefulness, indicates the advantages of DOACs over warfarin (HR; 0.75-0.82). Dabigatran had lower usefulness than edoxaban and rivaroxaban in Japanese patients treated with NVAF, even after considering the unmeasured confounding factor of kidney function. Based on practical clinical data, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were the most useful anticoagulants in Japanese patients with NVAF., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background/aims: Early studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reported a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with warfarin; however, recent studies have reported a reduced risk. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the risk of GIB in users of DOAC and warfarin., Methods: Using a common data model, we investigated the comparative risk of GIB in subjects from eight hospitals who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. We excluded subjects who had a prior history of GIB or had been prescribed both medications. After propensity score matching, we analyzed 3,347 matched pairs of new DOAC and new warfarin users., Results: The risk of GIB in new DOAC users was comparable to that in new warfarin users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.40; p=0.808). New DOAC users had a similar risk of GIB to new warfarin users among older patients >65 years (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.52; p=0.997) and in older patients >75 years (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.68 to 2.10; p=0.509). In addition, the risk of GIB was not significantly different between two groups according to sex. We also found that the risk of GIB in DOAC users was 26% lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups compared to rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; p=0.049)., Conclusions: In real-world practice, the risk of GIB in new DOAC users is comparable to that in new warfarin users. In DOAC users, the risk of GIB was lower in edoxaban or apixaban subgroups than rivaroxaban or dabigatran subgroups.

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism., Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

This was an open-label, single-dose, phase I study to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of edoxaban in pediatric subjects from birth to 18 years at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Children requiring anticoagulant therapy were enrolled into 5 age cohorts (0 to < 6 months (N = 12), 0.5 to < 2 years (N = 13), 2 to < 6 years (N = 13), 6 to < 12 years (N = 13), and 12 to < 18 years (N = 15)) receiving tablet or oral suspension of edoxaban at doses expected to be equivalent to 30 or 60 mg once daily (q.d.) in adult subjects with VTE. Sixty-six pediatric subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Edoxaban plasma concentration peaked between 1 and 3 hours and declined rapidly until 4-8 hours. The range of mean total apparent clearance across 5 age cohorts at low and high doses was 0.47 to 1.11 L/h/kg. The ranges of mean volume of central compartment and apparent peripheral volume were 2.31 to 3.59 L/kg and 1.92 to 4.14 L/kg, respectively. Across all age groups, the estimated median exposures were within the 0.5- to 1.5-fold of the median area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) in adult subjects receiving corresponding doses (30 mg q.d. for low dose and 60 mg q.d. for high dose). In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear PK-PD relationship and were in line with previous adult data. The results support further evaluation of the pediatric doses in larger pivotal trials., (© 2024 Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background:  We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of low-dose (15 mg) edoxaban in very elderly patients (≥80 years) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and high bleeding risk., Methods:  This subanalysis of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter ELDERCARE-AF study evaluated edoxaban plasma concentrations and compared them with the Japanese population of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Japanese severe renal impairment (SRI) studies., Results:  The PK analysis population included 451 patients, 53.8% of whom concomitantly used antiplatelet drugs, 41.0% had SRI, and 38.0% had low body weight. Edoxaban plasma concentrations at trough and 1 to 3 hours post-dose in ELDERCARE-AF were 17.3 ± 13.9 ( n  = 427) and 93.3 ± 57.8 ng/mL ( n  = 447), respectively. These values were slightly higher than the 15 mg group in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 ( n  = 79; 12.4 ± 12.1 and n  = 115; 78.7 ± 45.0 ng/mL, respectively), lower than the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 high-dose reduced to 30 mg group ( n  = 83; 25.1 ± 36.6 and n  = 111; 150 ± 91.6 ng/mL, respectively), but similar to the Japanese SRI study ( n  = 39; 18.4 ± 11.2 and n  = 40; 96.8 ± 48.3 ng/mL, respectively). ELDERCARE-AF patients with SRI and low body weight (≤45 kg) had higher concentrations than those without, and those taking antiplatelet drugs had lower concentrations than those who were not., Conclusion:  PK data support edoxaban 15 mg once daily for very elderly NVAF patients with high bleeding risk, with caution for patients with SRI and/or low body weight., Competing Interests: T.Y. received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., and Bristol Myers Squibb K.K.; personal fees from Pfizer Japan Inc., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Toa Eiyo Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. outside the submitted work. Y.I., M.F., and T.H. are employees of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. S.H. is an employee of Certara, Inc. K.O. received grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Johnson and Johnson K.K., and Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd. outside the submitted work., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

Background: The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk., Methods and Results: In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N = 151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N = 450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12- and 3-month treatments. The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P = 0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than in the 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signalling there was a potential interaction (P = 0.07)., Conclusions: A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy., Trial Registration Number: NCT03895502 (ONCO DVT Trial): https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03895502., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Adrenal insufficiency in patients with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is treated with glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Control of adrenal-derived androgen excess usually requires supraphysiologic glucocorticoid dosing, which predisposes patients to glucocorticoid-related complications. Crinecerfont, an oral corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, lowered androstenedione levels in phase 2 trials involving patients with CAH., Methods: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with CAH in a 2:1 ratio to receive crinecerfont or placebo for 24 weeks. Glucocorticoid treatment was maintained at a stable level for 4 weeks to evaluate androstenedione values, followed by glucocorticoid dose reduction and optimization over 20 weeks to achieve the lowest glucocorticoid dose that maintained androstenedione control (≤120% of the baseline value or within the reference range). The primary efficacy end point was the percent change in the daily glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 24 with maintenance of androstenedione control., Results: All 182 patients who underwent randomization (122 to the crinecerfont group and 60 to the placebo group) were included in the 24-week analysis, with imputation of missing values; 176 patients (97%) remained in the trial at week 24. The mean glucocorticoid dose at baseline was 17.6 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day of hydrocortisone equivalents; the mean androstenedione level was elevated at 620 ng per deciliter. At week 24, the change in the glucocorticoid dose (with androstenedione control) was -27.3% in the crinecerfont group and -10.3% in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, -17.0 percentage points; P<0.001). A physiologic glucocorticoid dose (with androstenedione control) was reported in 63% of the patients in the crinecerfont group and in 18% in the placebo group (P<0.001). At week 4, androstenedione levels decreased with crinecerfont (-299 ng per deciliter) but increased with placebo (45.5 ng per deciliter) (least-squares mean difference, -345 ng per deciliter; P<0.001). Fatigue and headache were the most common adverse events in the two trial groups., Conclusions: Among patients with CAH, the use of crinecerfont resulted in a greater decrease from baseline in the mean daily glucocorticoid dose, including a reduction to the physiologic range, than placebo following evaluation of adrenal androgen levels. (Funded by Neurocrine Biosciences; CAHtalyst ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04490915.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Children with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency require treatment with glucocorticoids, usually at supraphysiologic doses, to address cortisol insufficiency and reduce excess adrenal androgens. However, such treatment confers a predisposition to glucocorticoid-related complications. In 2-week phase 2 trials, patients with CAH who received crinecerfont, a new oral corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, had decreases in androstenedione levels., Methods: In this phase 3, multinational, randomized trial, we assigned pediatric participants with CAH, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive crinecerfont or placebo for 28 weeks. A stable glucocorticoid dose was maintained for 4 weeks, and the dose was then adjusted to a target of 8.0 to 10.0 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day (hydrocortisone dose equivalents), provided that the androstenedione level was controlled (≤120% of the baseline level or within the reference range). The primary efficacy end point was the change in the androstenedione level from baseline to week 4. A key secondary end point was the percent change in the glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 28 while androstenedione control was maintained., Results: A total of 103 participants underwent randomization, of whom 69 were assigned to crinecerfont and 34 to placebo; 100 (97%) remained in the trial at 28 weeks. At baseline, the mean glucocorticoid dose was 16.4 mg per square meter per day, and the mean androstenedione level was 431 ng per deciliter (15.0 nmol/liter). At week 4, androstenedione was substantially reduced in the crinecerfont group (-197 ng per deciliter [-6.9 nmol/liter]) but increased in the placebo group (71 ng per deciliter [2.5 nmol/liter]) (least-squares mean difference [LSMD], -268 ng per deciliter [-9.3 nmol/liter]; P<0.001); the observed mean androstenedione value, obtained before the morning glucocorticoid dose, was 208 ng per deciliter (7.3 nmol/liter) in the crinecerfont group, as compared with 545 ng per deciliter (19.0 nmol/liter) in the placebo group. At week 28, the mean glucocorticoid dose had decreased (while androstenedione control was maintained) by 18.0% with crinecerfont but increased by 5.6% with placebo (LSMD, -23.5 percentage points; P<0.001). Headache, pyrexia, and vomiting were the most common adverse events., Conclusions: In this phase 3 trial, crinecerfont was superior to placebo in reducing elevated androstenedione levels in pediatric participants with CAH and was also associated with a decrease in the glucocorticoid dose from supraphysiologic to physiologic levels while androstenedione control was maintained. (Funded by Neurocrine Biosciences; CAHtalyst Pediatric ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04806451.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background/objectives: In the last 10 years methylisothiazolinone (MI) emerged as a global cause of preservative-related ACD. New Zealand has liberal regulations for the MI concentration limit in cosmetic products compared to Europe and Australia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of MI sensitisation in New Zealand, explore sources of MI exposure and make recommendations on New Zealand regulations for MI use., Methods: This retrospective study included data from patients who underwent patch testing with MI from 2008 to 2021 in a tertiary hospital dermatology clinic and a private dermatology clinic in Auckland, New Zealand. Patient baseline characteristics were recorded along with results of patch testing. Sources of MI exposure were identified from medical records., Results: Over the study period, 1049 patch tests were performed in 1044 patients. MI was only tested as a stand-alone allergen from 2015; positive reactions to MI increased from 5.3% in 2015 to a peak of 11.9% in 2017 and then decreased to 6.4% in 2021. The most common source of MI exposure was shampoo or conditioner (27.7% of all relevant reactions) followed by occupational exposures to paints, biocides or glue (19.1%)., Conclusion: Both sensitisation and ACD to MI appear to be decreasing, likely secondary to changes in product compounding due to stricter concentration limits internationally. We recommend New Zealand adopt lower MI concentration limits for cosmetics to match the limits of Australia and Europe., (© 2024 Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Background: Treatment with different antipsychotics can lead to various metabolic side effects in patients with psychosis, impacting long-term prognosis. This study aimed to compare the changes and clinical efficacy of insulin resistance in patients treated with olanzapine and ziprasidone., Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 80 patients with schizophrenia. The patients were divided into olanzapine treatment group and ziprasidone treatment group. Parameters including body weight, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), cholesterol (CHO), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), insulin resistance index, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores were recorded and compared before and after treatment., Results: BMI, FPG, FPI, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), CHO, TG and LDL in both groups were significantly higher than before treatment (p < 0.05). These parameters were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the ziprasidone group (p < 0.05). The level of HDL in both groups was significantly decreased after treatment, and the level of HDL in the olanzapine group was significantly lower than that in the ziprasidone group after treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, the total score and score of PANSS in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference in total score and PANSS score between both groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of insulin resistance (IR) was significantly higher in the olanzapine group compared to the ziprasidone group (χ2 = 4.021, p < 0.05). In the IR group, BMI, FPG, FPI, TG, and LDL levels were higher than in the non-IR group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that BMI, FPG, FPI, TG, and LDL were independent risk factors for IR (odd ratio (OR) >1, p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Treatment with olanzapine and ziprasidone improves clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, but increases the risk of insulin resistance. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are more pronounced.

Background: To assess long-term effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in Europe., Methods and Results: ETNA-AF-Europe, a prospective, multinational, multi-centre, post-authorisation, observational study was conducted in agreement with the European Medicines Agency. The primary and secondary objectives assessed real-world safety (including bleeding and deaths) and effectiveness (including stroke, systemic embolic events and clinical edoxaban use), respectively. Median (interquartile range) age of the 13,164 patients was 75.0 (68.0-80.0) years; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.0 (2.0-4.0) and 2.0 (1.0-2.0), respectively. Follow-up duration was 3.98 (3.21-4.05) years. Patients on edoxaban 30 mg (n = 3042) at baseline were older (80.0 vs 73.0 years), more likely assessed as frail by investigators (27.0% vs 6.6%) and had more comorbidities than those on edoxaban 60 mg (n = 9617; missing dosing information for n = 505). Annualised event rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death in the overall population, edoxaban 60 mg and edoxaban 30 mg groups were 4.1%, 2.8% and 8.4%, and 1.0%, 0.7% and 2.0%, respectively. Annualised rates of stroke were relatively constant throughout the follow-up, transient ischaemic attack and systemic embolism were < 1% in the overall population. Rates of any major and major gastrointestinal bleeding were low, with slightly higher rates for edoxaban 30 vs 60 mg group. Intracranial haemorrhage was uncommon (0.2%)., Conclusions: In European patients with AF, long-term therapy with edoxaban is associated with low and relatively constant annualised rates of stroke and major bleeding. Differences in outcomes between the two approved doses are attributable to differences in clinical characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest P.K. receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union Big- Data@Heart (grant agreement EU IMI 116074) CATCH ME (grant agreement ID: 633196) AFFECT-EU (grant agreement ID: 847770); Leducq foundation, Medical Research Council (UK); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research; from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last three years. P.K. is listed as inventor on two patents held by University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). P.K. is employed as Director of the Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg and Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine (part-time), University of Birmingham, UK. He is Speaker of the board of AFNET, Germany, and Board member of the ESC. A.B. is founder and clinical trial design advisor of Amore Health Ltd., reports support from Daiichi Sankyo for attending meetings and advisory boards; receives honorarium from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, BMS, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Napp, Boehringer Ingelheim for lecturing and scientific advice outside the submitted work. C.d.A. has received compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, Atricure, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Acutus Medical and research grants on behalf of the centre from Biotronik, Medtronic Abbott, Microport, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Acutus Medical. J.R.d.G. reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study; grants from Abbott, Atricure, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic; personal fees from Atricure, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Medtronic, Novartis, and Servier; and other from RhythmCARE outside the submitted work. J.C.D. has received honoraria for lectures from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol Myers Squibb. J.C.D. has also received research grants from Boston Scientific, Sorin Group, Biotronik, and Abbott. P.K. has received speaker's and committee membership from Daiichi Sankyo, and received consulting fee (<€5000) from Alexion and Novo Nordisk. He is the Lead Investigator of the HRB Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland, which has received grant funding from the Irish government, Irish Heart Foundation, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and A Menarini. E.L.-d.-S. reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo; grants and personal fees from Servier, ZOLL Medical, and Becton Dickinson; grants from AstraZeneca, MedImmune LLC and Novartis, during the conduct of the study. P.M. is an ETNA-AF investigator and has received lecture and research fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer/BMS. E.-M.F., M.L., P.L., and R.S. are employees of Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany. J.S. has received consultant and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Alexion, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Medscape, Medtronic, Menarini, Merck/MSD, Organon, Pfizer, Saja, Servier, and WebMD. He reports ownership of Swiss EP and CorXL. J.W. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from Akzea, Bayer Vital, MSD, Berlin-Chemie and Siemens Healthineers, outside the submitted work. T.W.W. has received fees, honoraria and research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Menarini Pharma, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. R.D.C. reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Daiichi Sankyo, during the conduct of the study; and reports consulting fees, honoraria and other financial or non-financial interests: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Milestone, Novartis, Sanofi, Menarini, Guidotti, and Roche, outside the submitted work. Consultancy fees from Daiichi Sankyo Europe for the Chairing of the ETNA-AF Europe registry., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Delirium is common during critical illness and is associated with long-term cognitive impairment and disability. Antipsychotics are frequently used to treat delirium, but their effects on long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of antipsychotic treatment of delirious, critically ill patients on long-term cognitive, functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes., Methods: This prespecified, long-term follow-up to the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 MIND-USA Study was conducted in 16 hospitals throughout the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who had been admitted to an intensive care unit with respiratory failure or septic or cardiogenic shock were eligible for inclusion in the study if they had delirium. Participants were randomly assigned-using a computer-generated, permuted-block randomisation scheme with stratification by trial site and age-in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous placebo, haloperidol, or ziprasidone for up to 14 days. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment group assignment. 3 months and 12 months after randomisation, we assessed survivors' cognitive, functional, psychological, quality-of-life, and employment outcomes using validated telephone-administered tests and questionnaires. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01211522, and is complete., Findings: Between Dec 7, 2011, and Aug 12, 2017, we screened 20 914 individuals, of whom 566 were eligible and consented or had consent provided to participate. Of these 566 patients, 184 were assigned to the placebo group, 192 to the haloperidol group, and 190 to the ziprasidone group. 1-year survival and follow-up rates were similar between groups. Cognitive impairment was common in all three treatment groups, with a third of survivors impaired at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up in all groups. More than half of the surveyed survivors in each group had cognitive or physical limitations (or both) that precluded employment at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up. At both 3 months and 12 months, neither haloperidol (adjusted odds ratio 1·22 [95% CI 0·73-2.04] at 3 months and 1·12 [0·60-2·11] at 12 months) nor ziprasidone (1·07 [0·59-1·96] at 3 months and 0·94 [0·62-1·44] at 12 months) significantly altered cognitive outcomes, as measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status T score, compared with placebo. We also found no evidence that functional, psychological, quality-of-life, or employment outcomes improved with haloperidol or ziprasidone compared with placebo., Interpretation: In delirious, critically ill patients, neither haloperidol nor ziprasidone had a significant effect on cognitive, functional, psychological, or quality-of-life outcomes among survivors. Our findings, along with insufficient evidence of short-term benefit and frequent inappropriate continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge, indicate that antipsychotics should not be used routinely to treat delirium in critically ill adults., Funding: National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Veterans Affairs., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The following declarations of interest are reported outside of the submitted work. MFM reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US Department of Veterans Affairs. LMB reports grants from the NIH and the American Association of Critical Care Nurses. MNG reports grants from the NIH, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; consulting fees for a role as scientific advisor for Endpoint Health; honoraria for grand rounds presentation at Yale University (New Haven, CT, USA); travel support from the American Thoracic Society executive committee; and participation on the data safety monitoring board for a trial on monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19, funded by Regeneron (NCT04452318). AM reports consulting fees from Zoll, Eli Lilly, LivaNova, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and a philanthropic contribution from ResMed to the University of California San Diego (La Jolla, CA, USA). BAK reports grants from the NIH, payment for expert testimony for a medicolegal case in the state of Indiana (USA), payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board for the PANDORA trial, and a leadership role as president of the American Delirium Society. SSC reports grants from the NIH and direct payments for participation on the data safety monitoring board of an NIH-funded study unrelated to delirium. CLH reports grants from the NIH. PR reports grants from the NIH and the US Department of Defense, payment and travel support for a continuing medical education event at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and previous leadership of the Association of Academic Anesthesiology Chairs and Society of Academic Associations of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. BTP reports leadership as co-chair of the Society of Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Committee. PPP reports grants from the NIH. NEB reports grants from the NIH and travel support for the Society of Intensive Care Medicine Singapore annual meeting. CGH reports consulting fees for Sedana Medical. MBP reports grants from CSL Behring, the NIH, and the US Department of Defense; royalties for serving as an associate editor with Elsevier on a surgical textbook; travel support for continuing medical education events with the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Society of University Surgeons, and American College of Surgeons; a patent for image-derived prognostic models unrelated to this work; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Liberate Medical; and leadership as treasurer for the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. JLS reports honoria for presentations for the Society of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, the Chilean Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy; travel support for meetings with the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy, and the Chilean Society of Critical Care Medicine; and leadership on committees with the Society of Critical Care Medicine. EWE reports grant support from the NIH and the US Department of Veterans Affairs, honoraria for continuing medical education lectures sponsored by Pfizer, and study support (investigational drug provision, no direct payments) from Eli Lilly. TDG reports grants from the NIH, research funding from Ceribell, and personal fees from Haisco Pharmaceutical and Lungpacer Medical. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Due to an increasing occupational usage of isothiazolinone (IT)-containing preservatives, and their potential to cause skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis, that is, chronic disease, there is a need for more knowledge on how highly exposed workers are affected., Objectives: The overall objective was to explore dermatological symptoms of potentially long-lasting or chronic character in Swedish painters., Methods: Building painters from western and southern Sweden were initially invited to perform a questionnaire on occurrence of skin symptoms. Participants with affirmative responses, and the right inclusion criteria, were further invited to patch testing with four different ITs: benzisothiazolinone (BIT), methylisothiazolinone, methylchloroisothiazolinone and octylisothiazolinone., Results: There was a tendency towards higher occurrence of positive patch test reactions among the painters compared with occupationally unexposed registry patients; however, not statistically significant differences. BIT was the substance most frequently causing positive test results in both groups. The occurrence of adult-onset eczema was higher in painters than in the control group of electricians, and just shy of statistical significance concerning any of several skin locations (face/legs/arms/hands)., Conclusion: Building painters present with positive patch test reactions to common paint preservatives (ITs), and they report adult-onset eczema more often than do less occupationally exposed groups., (© 2024 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)