Search

Mycoplasma genitalium , a sexually transmitted bacterium, is a significant cause of urethritis in men and various reproductive tract infections in women, including cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometritis, and potentially infertility. Treatment has become increasingly challenging due to the emergence of resistance to both first-line (azithromycin) and second-line (moxifloxacin) antibiotics. The need for new treatment options is critical. This study evaluates the in vitro efficacy of the novel antibiotic lefamulin against 54 M . genitalium isolates, including highly resistant variants. Additionally, the potential synergistic effects of combining lefamulin with doxycycline were assessed in eight selected isolates. Lefamulin exhibited strong antibacterial activity across all tested isolates, with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.0005 to 0.064 µg/mL. Minimal bactericidal concentrations ranged from 0.001 to 0.128 µg/mL and were equal to the MIC in 40 of 54 isolates and within two- and fourfold MIC in the rest of the isolates. Notably, lefamulin's MIC values were significantly lower than those of azithromycin, doxycycline, and moxifloxacin, underscoring its potent efficacy. Checkerboard assays revealed no antagonistic interaction between lefamulin and doxycycline, with some additive effects observed in certain isolates. These findings highlight lefamulin's potential as a highly effective treatment for M. genitalium infections, particularly those involving multi-drug-resistant strains. Given the increasing rates of resistance and the limitations of current therapies, lefamulin may represent a promising new option for managing this challenging pathogen. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm these in vitro results and explore the therapeutic potential of lefamulin in combination with doxycycline., Competing Interests: K.S.-R., T.R.P., and C.N. report no conflicts. S.P. is employed by Nabriva. J.S.J. received grants, speaker's fees, and non-financial support from Hologic, speaker's fees from LeoPharma, and grants from Nabriva and serves on the scientific advisory board of Roche Molecular Systems, Abbott Molecular, BioMerieux, and Cepheid.

Erdostein belongs to the well-known thiol mucoactive drugs, whose effect is used in respiratory infections. Recently, expert findings show that the effect of erdosteine is more complex and can significantly contribute to the management of respiratory infections. Its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties come to the fore, or antiviral properties associated with them, as well as the ability to reduce bacterial adhesion and increase the effects of some antibiotics. Erdostein represents a comprehensive therapeutic option both in the field of self-treatment of respiratory infections and in other respiratory diseases.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major health burden globally and in India. Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of COPD, causing mucus hypersecretion, bronchoconstriction, and accelerated lung function decline. An important class of pharmacological agents that are often less discussed are the thiol mucolytic agents, which have a two-pronged effect of serving as both a mucolytic and an antioxidant. One of these agents which has reignited interest lately is erdosteine, with recent evidence demonstrating advantages over traditionally used N-acetylcysteine. In this review, we have summarized the key available evidence for the role of erdosteine in COPD, with takeaways on its place in therapy., (© Journal of The Association of Physicians of India 2025.)

Background and Objectives: Erdosteine (Erd) is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory drug. Vitamin B has been reported to exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. In this study, we investigated the effect of erdosteine and vitamin B complex on a liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) model. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two Wistar Albino male rats weighing 350-400 g were used. The animals were randomly selected and divided into four groups. The groups are as follows: first group (Sham), second group (I/R), third group (I/R + vit B), and fourth group (I/R + vit B + Erd). Rats were subjected to 45 min of hepatic ischemia, followed by a 45 min reperfusion period in the I/R and Vitamin B + Erd groups. An amount of 150 mg/kg/day of erdosteine was given orally for 2 days, and 0.05 mL/kg of i.p. vitamin B complex was given 30 min before the reperfusion. Serum biochemical parameters were measured. Serum Total Antioxidant Status (TAS) and Total Oxidant Status (TOS) were measured, and the Oxidative Stress Index (OSI) was calculated. Hepatic tissue samples were taken for the evaluation of histopathological features. Results : In terms of all histopathological parameters, there were significant differences in the I/R + vit B group and I/R + vit B + Erd group compared with the I/R group ( p < 0.01). In terms of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), TNF-alpha, and IL-6 levels, there were significant differences between the I/R group and treatment groups ( p < 0.01). The lowest TOS and OSI levels were obtained in the treatment groups, and these groups had statistically significantly higher TAS levels compared with the sham and I/R groups ( p < 0.01). Conclusions : As a preliminary experimental study, our study suggests that these agents may have potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications for both ischemic conditions and liver-related diseases. These results suggest that the combination of vit B + Erd may be used to protect against the devastating effects of I/R injury. Our study needs to be confirmed by clinical studies with large participation.

Introduction: Bronchiectasis is a worldwide chronic lung disorder where exacerbations are common. It affects people of all ages, but especially Indigenous populations in high-income nations. Despite being a major contributor to chronic lung disease, there are no licensed therapies for bronchiectasis and there remain relatively few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in children and adults. Our RCT will address some of these unmet needs by evaluating whether the novel mucoactive agent, erdosteine, has a therapeutic role in children and adults with bronchiectasis.Our primary aim is to determine in children and adults aged 2-49 years with bronchiectasis whether regular erdosteine over a 12-month period reduces acute respiratory exacerbations compared with placebo. Our primary hypothesis is that people with bronchiectasis who regularly use erdosteine will have fewer exacerbations than those receiving placebo.Our secondary aims are to determine the effect of the trial medications on quality of life (QoL) and other clinical outcomes (exacerbation duration, time-to-next exacerbation, hospitalisations, lung function, adverse events). We will also assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention., Methods and Analysis: We are undertaking an international multicentre, double-blind, placebo-RCT to evaluate whether 12 months of erdosteine is beneficial for children and adults with bronchiectasis. We will recruit 194 children and adults with bronchiectasis to a parallel, superiority RCT at eight sites across Australia, Malaysia and Philippines. Our primary endpoint is the rate of exacerbations over 12 months. Our main secondary outcomes are QoL, exacerbation duration, time-to-next exacerbation, hospitalisations and lung function., Ethics and Dissemination: The Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC) of Children's Health Queensland (for all Australian sites), University of Malaya Medical Centre (Malaysia) and St. Luke's Medical Centre (Philippines) approved the study. We will publish the results and share the outcomes with the academic and medical community, funding and relevant patient organisations., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12621000315819., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

There are some indications in a few studies on animals and humans that the mucolytic agents N-acetylcysteine and erdosteine have a disruptive effect on the coagulation cascade. This study aimed to examine the effects of both erdosteine and N-acetylcysteine on the coagulation pathway., Materials and Methods: The research was conducted on patients treated with N-acetylcysteine (600 mg/day) or erdosteine (600 mg/day) for 7-14 days. To evaluate the coagulation and hemogram parameters, blood samples were taken from patients before treatment and on days 7-14 after starting the treatment. Hemogram and coagulation parameters were measured in the venous blood samples., Results: The levels of factor II significantly decreased, and the platelet count significantly increased in patients treated with erdosteine. D-dimer levels reduced and factor VII levels increased in patients treated with N-acetylcysteine, but these changes were not significant (p=0.069 and p=0.062, respectively). Other coagulation and hemogram values did not change in both groups. Erdosteine may have a dualistic effect on the coagulation cascade through its different metabolites., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic agent within the pleuromutilin derivative class approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Commission in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The objective of this article is to provide a summary of clinically relevant data underlying lefamulin and to provide recommendations for its place in therapy. In vitro data establish lefamulin's activity against a number of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical organisms relevant in the treatment of CABP, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Two phase-3 studies, the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia trials, established non-inferiority of lefamulin against moxifloxacin in the treatment of CABP, including the sequential transition from intravenous to oral therapy and across a broad set of patient demographics and severities. Pooled and post hoc analyses have confirmed these effects for a variety of subgroups and secondary endpoints. Real-world study data post-approval have largely not yet emerged for lefamulin, and there is a need for further investigation into safety/efficacy for off-label indications such as acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and sexually transmitted infections. Further data regarding tolerability, particularly with long-term use, as well as the emergence of resistance over time, are still undefined., (© 2021 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Obesity is characterized as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation harmful to one's health, linked to hormonal imbalances, cardiovascular illness, and coronary artery disease. Since the disease stems mainly from overconsumption, studies have aimed to control intestinal absorption as a route for treatment. In this study, chitosan-thioglycolic acid (CT) was developed as a physical barrier in the gastrointestinal tracts to inhibit nutrient uptake. CT exhibits a superior mucoadhesive property compared to chitosan both in vitro and in vivo for the ability to form disulfide bonds with the intestinal mucosa. For CT as a potential drug delivery platform, hesperidin, a herb for bodyweight control in traditional Chinese medication, is encapsulated in CT and can be released consistently from this absorption barrier. In animal studies, CT encapsulated with hesperidin (CTH) not only results in a weight-controlling effect but limits adipose accumulation by hindering absorption, suggesting a potential role in obesity treatment. Neither CT nor CTH exhibit cytotoxicity or produce adverse immunological reactions in vivo.

Background: Tophi develop in untreated or uncontrolled gout. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2014.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of non-surgical and surgical treatments for the management of tophi in gout., Search Methods: We updated the search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase databases to 28 August 2020., Selection Criteria: We included all published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials examining interventions for tophi in gout in adults., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane., Main Results: We included one trial in our original review. We added four more trials (1796 participants) in this update. One had three arms; pegloticase infusion every two weeks (biweekly), monthly pegloticase infusion (pegloticase infusion alternating with placebo infusion every two weeks) and placebo. Two studies looked at lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with allopurinol. One trial studied lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with febuxostat. One trial compared febuxostat 80 mg and 120 mg to allopurinol. Two trials were at unclear risk of performance and detection bias due to lack of information on blinding of participants and personnel. All other trials were at low risk of bias. Moderate-certainty evidence (downgraded for imprecision; one study; 79 participants) showed that biweekly pegloticase resolved tophi in 21/52 participants compared with 2/27 on placebo (risk ratio (RR) 5.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38 to 21.54; number needed to treat for a benefit (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 6). Similar proportions of participants receiving biweekly pegloticase (80/85) had an adverse event compared to placebo (41/43) (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07). However, more participants on biweekly pegloticase (15/85) withdrew due to an adverse event compared to placebo (1/43) (RR 7.59, 95% CI 1.04 to 55.55; number needed to treat for a harm (NNTH) 7, 95% CI 4 to 16). More participants on monthly pegloticase (11/52) showed complete resolution of tophi compared with placebo (2/27) (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 11.97; NNTB 8, 95% CI 4 to 91). Similar numbers of participants on monthly pegloticase (84/84) had an adverse event compared to placebo (41/43) (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14). More participants on monthly pegloticase (16/84) withdrew due to adverse events compared to placebo (1/43) (RR 8.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 59.71; NNTH 6, 95% CI 4 to 14). Infusion reaction was the most common reason for withdrawal. Moderate-certainty evidence (2 studies; 103 participants; downgraded for imprecision) showed no clinically significant difference for complete resolution of target tophus in the lesinurad 200 mg plus allopurinol arm (11/53) compared to the placebo plus allopurinol arm (16/50) (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.57), or in the lesinurad 400 mg plus allopurinol arm (12/48) compared to the placebo plus allopurinol arm (16/50) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.49). An extension study examined lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with febuxostat, or placebo (low-certainty evidence, downgraded for indirectness and imprecision). Participants on lesinurad in the original study continued (CONT) on the same dose. Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may be beneficial for tophi resolution; 43/65 in the lesinurad 400 mg CONT arm compared to 38/64 in the lesinurad 200 mg CONT arm had tophi resolution (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.46). Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may result in no difference in adverse events; 57/65 in the lesinurad 400 mg CONT arm had an adverse event compared to 50/64 in lesinurad 200 mg CONT arm (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.32). Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may result in no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events; 10/65 participants in the lesinurad 400 mg CONT arm withdrew due to an adverse event compared to 10/64 participants in the lesinurad 200 mg CONT arm (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.20). Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may result in no difference in mean serum uric acid (sUA), which was 3 mg/dl in the lesinurad 400 mg CONT group compared to 3.9 mg/dl in the lesinurad 200 mg CONT group (mean difference -0.90, 95% CI -1.51 to -0.29). Participants who were not on lesinurad in the original study were randomised (CROSS) to lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg, both in combination with febuxostat. Low-certainty evidence downgraded for indirectness and imprecision showed that lesinurad 400 mg (CROSS) may result in tophi resolution (17/34) compared to lesinurad 200 mg (CROSS) (14/33) (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.98). Lesinurad 400 mg in combination with febuxostat may result in no difference in adverse events (33/34 in the lesinurad 400 mg CROSS arm compared to 27/33 in the lesinurad 200 mg (CROSS); RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.41). Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may result in no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events, 5/34 in the lesinurad 400 mg CROSS arm withdrew compared to 2/33 in the lesinurad 200 mg CROSS arm (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.64). Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat results in no difference in sUA (4.2 mg/dl in lesinurad 400 mg CROSS) compared to lesinurad 200 mg (3.8 mg/dl in lesinurad 200 mg CROSS), mean difference 0.40 mg/dl, 95% CI -0.75 to 1.55., Authors' Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence showed that pegloticase is probably beneficial for resolution of tophi in gout. Although there was little difference in adverse events when compared to placebo, participants on pegloticase had more withdrawals due to adverse events. Lesinurad 400 mg plus febuxostat may be beneficial for tophi resolution compared with lesinurad 200 mg plus febuxostat; there was no difference in adverse events between these groups. We were unable to determine whether lesinurad plus febuxostat is more effective than placebo. Lesinurad (400 mg or 200 mg) plus allopurinol is probably not beneficial for tophi resolution, and there was no difference in adverse events between these groups. RCTs on interventions for managing tophi in gout are needed, and the lack of trial data is surprising given that allopurinol is a well-established treatment for gout., (Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Lefamulin is a novel oral and intravenous (IV) pleuromutilin developed as a twice-daily treatment for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). It is a semi-synthetic pleuromutilin with a chemical structure that contains a tricyclic core of five-, six-, and eight-membered rings and a 2-(4-amino-2-hydroxycyclohexyl)sulfanylacetate side chain extending from C14 of the tricyclic core. Lefamulin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S bacterial ribosomal subunit in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC). The pleuromutilin tricyclic core binds to a pocket close to the A site, while the C14 side chain extends to the P site causing a tightening of the rotational movement in the binding pocket referred to as an induced-fit mechanism. Lefamulin displays broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as against atypical bacteria that commonly cause CABP. Pleuromutilin antibiotics exhibit low rates of resistance development and lack cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes due to their unique mechanism of action. However, pleuromutilin activity is affected by mutations in 23S rRNA, 50S ribosomal subunit proteins rplC and rplD, ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-F transporter proteins such as vga(A), and the methyltransferase cfr. The pharmacokinetic properties of lefamulin include: volume of distribution (V d ) ranging from 82.9 to 202.8 L, total clearance (CL T ) of 19.5 to 21.4 L/h, and terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2 ) of 6.9-13.2 h; protein binding of lefamulin is high and non-linear. The oral bioavailability of lefamulin has been estimated as 24% in fasted subjects and 19% in fed subjects. A single oral dose of lefamulin 600 mg administered in fasted patients achieved a maximum plasma concentration (C max ) of 1.2-1.5 mg/L with a time of maximum concentration (T max ) ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 h, and an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) of 8.5-8.8 mg h/L. The pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of lefamulin efficacy is the free plasma area under the concentration-time curve divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC 24h /MIC). Lefamulin efficacy has been demonstrated using various animal models including neutropenic murine thigh infection, pneumonia, lung infection, and bacteremia. Lefamulin clinical safety and efficacy was investigated through a Phase II clinical trial of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI), as well as two Phase III clinical trials of CABP. The Phase III trials, LEAP 1 and LEAP 2 established non-inferiority of lefamulin to moxifloxacin in both oral and IV formulations in the treatment of CABP. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have each approved lefamulin for the treatment of CABP. A Phase II clinical trial has been completed for the treatment of ABSSSI, while the pediatric program is in Phase I. The most common adverse effects of lefamulin include mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal-related events such as nausea and diarrhea. Lefamulin represents a safe and effective option for treating CABP in cases of antimicrobial resistance to first-line therapies, clinical failure, or intolerance/adverse effects to currently used agents. Clinical experience and ongoing clinical investigation will allow clinicians and antimicrobial stewardship programs to optimally use lefamulin in the treatment of CABP.

This article aims to critically review the evidence on the available therapeutic strategies for the treatment of hyperuricemia. For this reason, several papers were reviewed. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors are the safest and most effective uric acid lowering drugs for the management of chronic hyperuricemia, while the efficacy of uricosuric agents is strongly modulated by pharmacogenetics. Emergent drugs (lesinurad, peglotidase) were found to be more effective for the acute management of refractory hyperuricemia, but their use is supported by a relatively small number of clinical trials so that further well-designed clinical research is needed to deepen their efficacy and safety profile.

&lt;b&gt;Background and Objective:&lt;/b&gt; Hyperuricemia is one of the most dangerous threats to human life. It is mainly associated with gout and inflammatory arthritis. Therefore, finding a safe medication that does not have severe side-effects is a goal shared by most physicians. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of lesinurad (Zurampic; ZUR) and allopurinol (ALP), both alone or in combination, on the treatment of hyperuricemic mice at the biochemical, molecular and cellular levels. &lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Lesinurad and allopurinol were orally administered to hyperuricemic and control mice for seven consecutive days, either alone or in combination. Levels of uric acid and xanthine oxidase activity, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, ALT and AST were measured in the serum. The mRNA expression of mouse hepatic guanine deaminase (Gda), purine nucleotide phosphorylase (PNP), renal urate anion transporter-1 (URAT-1) and OAT-1 transporters were examined. The renal tissues were examined using H and E staining and the immunoreactivity technique. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Lesinurad and allopurinol administration resulted in a significant decrease in serum levels of uric acid, blood urea nitrogen and xanthine oxidase activity reported in hyperuricemic mice. Both partially reversed oxonate-induced alterations in renal mURAT-1 and mOAT-1 expressions, as well as alterations in the immunoreactivity of Bcl2. All showed an increase in renal uric acid secretion and excretion. ALP and ZUT significantly decreased the increase in Gda and PNP expression reported in hyperuricemic mice. The combined administration of ZUR and ALP restored and improved renal function histopathological changes reported in hyperuricemic mice. &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; The hypouricemic impact of both lesinurad and allopurinol in the treatment of hyperuricemia in mice was confirmed following hyperuricemia treatment.

Objective: To review the pharmacology, microbiology, efficacy, and safety of lefamulin., Data Sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end-April 2020) with the search terms BC-3781 and lefamulin . Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and the manufacturer's and Food and Drug Administration websites., Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant English-language articles of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of lefamulin were included., Data Synthesis: Lefamulin is a pleuromutilin antibiotic with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae , and atypical bacteria. Lefamulin, given at the dose of 150 mg intravenously or 600 mg orally on an empty stomach every 12 hours for 5 to 7 days, was proven noninferior to moxifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Common adverse reactions include injection site reactions, hepatic enzyme elevation, gastrointestinal upset, hypokalemia, insomnia, and headache. Lefamulin is associated with QT prolongation, and concomitant use with CYP3A substrates that prolong the QT interval is contraindicated. Lefamulin may cause fetal harm., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic with a unique mechanism of action. It represents an alternative option to β-lactams and macrolides in the treatment of adults with CABP and an alternative option to amoxicillin and doxycycline in the outpatient setting given the rise in resistance to macrolides and safety concerns with fluoroquinolones. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may limit the tolerability of the oral formulation., Conclusions: Lefamulin is the first systemic pleuromutilin antibiotic that has proven safe and effective for adults with CABP.

Background: International guidelines recommend mucolytic agents as add-on therapy in selected patients with COPD because they may reduce exacerbations and improve health status. As the evidence varies among mucolytic agents, we used the Delphi method to assess consensus amongst an international panel of COPD experts on mucolytics use in COPD., Methods: 53 COPD experts from 12 countries were asked to complete an online questionnaire and rate their agreement with 15 statements using a 5-point scale. The mucolytic agents evaluated were carbocysteine, erdosteine and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Data were collected anonymously and consensus presented using descriptive statistics., Results: The 47 respondents reached consensus on the statements. They agreed that regular treatment with mucolytic agents effectively reduces the frequency of exacerbations, reduces the duration of mild-to-moderate exacerbations, and can increase the time to first exacerbation and symptom-free time in COPD patients. Consensus was consistently highest for erdosteine. The experts agreed that all three mucolytics display antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity. Erdosteine and NAC were thought to improve the efficacy of some classes of antibacterial drugs. All three mucolytics were considered effective for the short-term treatment of symptoms of acute exacerbations when added to other drugs. The panel agreed that approved doses of mucolytic agents have favorable side-effect profiles and can be recommended for regular use in patients with a bronchitic phenotype., Conclusions: Consensus findings support the wider use of mucolytic agents as add-on therapy for COPD. However, the differences in pharmacological actions and clinical effectiveness must be considered when deciding which mucolytic to use., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Erdosteine is a drug approved for the treatment of acute and chronic pulmonary diseases, originally developed as a mucolytic agent. It belongs to the thiol-based family of drugs that are known to also possess potentially important antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and exhibit antibacterial activity against a variety of medically important bacterial species. Erdosteine is a prodrug that is metabolized to the ring-opening compound metabolite M1 (MET 1), which has mucolytic properties. Experimental studies have documented that erdosteine prevents or reduces lung tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and, in particular, that Met 1 also regulates reactive oxygen species production. The RESTORE study, which has been the only trial that investigated the effects of a thiol-based drug in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequent exacerbators, documented that erdosteine significantly reduces the risk of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs), shortens their course, and also decreases the risk of hospitalization from COPD. The preventive action of erdosteine on AECOPDs was not affected by the presence or absence of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or blood eosinophil count. These findings clearly contrast with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy's approach to use erdosteine only in those COPD patients not treated simultaneously with an ICS. Furthermore, they support the possibility of using erdosteine in a step-down approach that in COPD is characterized by the withdrawal of the ICS.

Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against key community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin for treating CABP remains unclear.An integrated analysis of 2 phase III trials investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin vs moxifloxacin in the treatment of CABP was conducted.A total of 1289 patients (lefamulin group: 646 and moxifloxacin group: 643) were included in this analysis. The early clinical response rate was 89.3% and 90.5% among lefamulin and moxifloxacin group, respectively. Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin (89.3% vs 90.5%, RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95-1.02, I = 0%). In terms of clinical response at test of cure, no significant difference was observed between the lefamulin and moxifloxacin groups (for modified intention to treat population, RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.02, I = 0%; for clinically evaluable population, RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00, I = 0%). In the subgroup analysis, the early clinical response rate at early clinical assessment and clinical response rate at test of cure of lefamulin was similar to that of moxifloxacin across different subgpopulations and all baseline CABP pathogens. Lefamulin was associated with a similar risk of adverse events as moxifloxacin.Clinical efficacy and tolerability for lefamulin in the treatment of CABP were similar to those for moxifloxacin.

This article reviews seven drugs recently approved by the FDA, including indications, precautions, adverse reactions, and nursing considerations.

Introduction: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic that belongs to the pleuromutilin class with excellent activity against all microorganisms, including atypical pathogens, that cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)., Areas Covered: This article reviews the spectrum of activity, the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of lefamulin as well as its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of CAP in adult patients., Expert Opinion: The clinical efficacy of lefamulin in patients with non severe CAP has been demonstrated in 2 randomized clinical trials. Precisely one of the limitations of the phase 3 trials is that the proportion of severe CAP cases is very low. Its particular mechanism of action, affecting ribosomal protein synthesis, provides a low probability of cross-resistance to other commonly used antibiotics in CAP. These findings, together with the antimicrobial activity of lefamulin, its pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile make it a good alternative for outpatient treatment of CAP. In patients hospitalized with CAP, lefamulin can be used as a potential oral step-down agent after an intravenous regimen with beta-lactams, or as a therapeutic alternative in patients with β-lactam allergies.

Background: Hyperuricemia is an abnormal increase in uric acid levels in the blood. It is the cause of gout that manifested by inflammatory arthritis and painful disable. Therefore, current study evaluated the potential ameliorative impact of Lesinurad and Allopurinol on the kidneys of hyperuricemic mice at the biochemical, molecular and cellular levels., Methods: Lesinurad and allopurinol alone or in combination were orally administered to hyperuricemic and control mice for seven consecutive days. Levels of uric acid and blood urea nitrogen, along with antioxidants and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) were measured in the serum. The mRNA expression of mouse urate anion transporter-1, glucose transporter 9, organic anion transporters, in renal tissues were examined using quantitative real time PCR. Simultaneously, the immunoreactivity of transforming growth factor-beta 1 was examined immunohistochemically., Results: Lesinurad and allopurinol administration resulted in significant decrease in serum levels of uric acid, blood urea nitrogen, xanthine oxidase activity, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) reported in hyperuricemic mice. Both partially reversed oxonate-induced alterations in renal mURAT-1, mGLUT-9, mOAT-1 and mOAT-3 expressions, as well as alterations in the immunoreactivity of TGF- β1, resulting in the increase of renal uric acid secretion and excretion. The combined administration of lesinurad and ALP restored all altered parameters in a synergistic manner, improving renal function in the hyperuricemic mouse model employed., Conclusion: This study confirmed synergistic ameliorative hypouricemic impact of both lesinurad and allopurinol in the treatment of hyperuricemia in mice at the biochemical, molecular and cellular levels.

Background: The RESTORE study, a multi-national randomized, placebo-controlled study, showed that erdosteine - a muco-active antioxidant that modulates bacterial adhesiveness - reduced the rate and duration of exacerbations in moderate and severe COPD with a history of exacerbations. How much benefit patients with less severe disease experience when taking this drug remains unclear., Methods: This post hoc analysis of the 254 RESTORE participants with spirometrically-defined moderate COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV 1 ] 50‒79% predicted) examined exacerbation rate and duration, time to first exacerbation, and exacerbation-free time. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparisons between treatment groups used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Mann-Whitney U -tests, or log rank tests., Results: Patients with moderate COPD received erdosteine 300 mg twice daily (n=126) or placebo (n=128) added to usual COPD therapy for 12 months. During this time, there were 53 exacerbations in the erdosteine group and 74 in the placebo group, with 42.1% and 57.8% of patients, respectively, experiencing an exacerbation. There was a 47% reduction in the mean exacerbation rate with erdosteine compared to placebo (0.27 vs 0.51 exacerbations per-patient per-year, respectively, P =0.003), and a 58.3% reduction in the mild exacerbation rate (0.23 vs 0.53 mild exacerbations per-patient per-year, P =0.001). Mean duration of exacerbations was 26% shorter in erdosteine-treated patients (9.1 vs 12.3 days for placebo, P =0.022), with significant reductions in the duration of mild and moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Mean time to first exacerbation was prolonged by 7.7% (182 days for erdosteine vs 169 days for placebo, P <0.001) and the mean exacerbation-free time was increased by 51 days (279 days for erdosteine vs 228 days for placebo; P <0.001)., Conclusion: These results indicate that adding erdosteine to usual COPD maintenance therapy reduces the number of mild, and duration of all, exacerbations in patients with moderate COPD and a history of exacerbations., Competing Interests: EP is employed by Edmond Pharma. PC, CP, RDN, GF, MC, and AC report personal fees from Edmond Pharma. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2019 Calverley et al.)

Introduction/objectives: Lesinurad, in combination with allopurinol, has been approved for treatment of patients with gout which do not reach therapeutic serum urate target with xanthine oxidase inhibitors monotherapy. The study aimed to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adding lesinurad to allopurinol as second-line therapy, compared to febuxostat for patients with gout in Spain., Method: A Markov model representing disease evolution was used to estimate the lifetime accumulated cost and benefits in terms of quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY). Patients could either continue with second-line treatment with lesinurad (200 mg/daily) plus allopurinol (400 mg/daily) or febuxostat (80 mg/daily) switch to allopurinol monotherapy (271 mg/daily) in case of intolerance or discontinue treatment. The treatment's efficacy captured in the transition probabilities between health states were derived from CLEAR and EXCEL trials. Quality of life related to gout severity and flare frequency was considered by means of utilities. The total cost estimation (€, 2019) included drug acquisition cost, disease monitoring, and flare management cost. Unitary local costs derived from databases and literature. A 3% annual discount rate was applied for cost and outcomes., Results: Lesinurad plus allopurinol provided higher QALYs (14.79) than febuxostat (14.69). Total accrued cost/patient was lower with lesinurad and allopurinol (€50,631.51) versus febuxostat (€56,698.64). Lesinurad plus allopurinol resulted more effective and less costly (dominant option) versus febuxostat., Conclusions: Lesinurad plus allopurinol therapy compared with febuxostat seems an effective option for the management of hyperuricemia in patients who did not reach serum urate target to previous allopurinol monotherapy, associated to cost-savings for the Spanish Health System.Key Points• Lesinurad, in combination with allopurinol, has been recently authorized as second-line treatment of hyperuricemia in gout patients.• Lesinurad plus allopurinol provided higher effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted-life-years (14.79) than febuxostat (14.69).• Lesinurad plus allopurinol resulted less costly (total cost/per patient) compared with febuxostat.• Lesinurad plus allopurinol resulted a dominant option compared with febuxostat.

Background: Lefamulin, a pleuromutilin antibiotic, is active against pathogens commonly causing community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) study was a global noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lefamulin for the treatment of CABP., Methods: In this double-blind study, adults with CABP of Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk class ≥III were randomized 1:1 to receive lefamulin at 150 mg intravenously (IV) every 12 hours or moxifloxacin at 400 mg IV every 24 hours. After 6 doses, patients could be switched to an oral study drug if prespecified improvement criteria were met. If methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was suspected, either linezolid or placebo was added to moxifloxacin or lefamulin, respectively. The US Food and Drug Administration primary endpoint was an early clinical response (ECR) 96 ± 24 hours after the first dose of the study drug in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (noninferiority margin, 12.5%). The European Medicines Agency co-primary endpoints were an investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) 5-10 days after the last dose of the study drug in the modified ITT (mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations (noninferiority margin, 10%)., Results: There were 551 patients randomized (n = 276 lefamulin; n = 275 moxifloxacin). Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for ECR (87.3% vs 90.2%, respectively; difference -2.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] g -8.5 to 2.8) and IACR (mITT, 81.7% vs 84.2%, respectively; difference -2.6%, 95% CI -8.9 to 3.9; CE, 86.9% vs 89.4%, respectively; difference -2.5%, 95% CI -8.4 to 3.4). Rates of study drug discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 2.9% for lefamulin and 4.4% for moxifloxacin., Conclusions: Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for the primary efficacy endpoints and was generally safe and well tolerated., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02559310., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Despite the increasing availability of antibiotics with activity against pathogens that cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), CAP remains a major cause of morbidity, hospital admissions and re-admissions, and mortality. Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against both typical and atypical CAP pathogens. In this review of the medical literature, we summarize the available information, including mounting clinical evidence, about lefamulin and its potential value in CAP.

Thiol-based drugs are considered as mucolytics because they decrease the viscosity and mostly decrease the elasticity of bronchial secretions by reducing disulfide bonds in proteins. However, they can also act as antioxidant drugs directly through free sulfhydryl groups that serve as a source of reducing equivalents, as well as indirectly through the replenishment of intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels. Modulation of neurokinin A levels may also be related to the effect of thiol drugs on oxidative stress. Moreover, thiol-based drugs interfere with inflammatory pathways and modulate human bronchial tone. They might also be considered as therapeutic agents against some types of infection because they reduce bacterial adhesion to the respiratory epithelial cell surface and inhibit biofilm formation, causing biofilm disruption and thereby improving the efficacy of antibiotic therapy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To date there are no head-to-head studies comparing different mucolytic/antioxidant agents. Considering the inconsistent evidence resulting from the pivotal studies on mucolytic/antioxidant agents tested in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the recent publication of Reducing Exacerbations and Symptoms by Treatment with ORal Erdosteine in COPD (RESTORE) study, we have performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of erdosteine 600 mg/day, carbocysteine 1500 mg/day, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 1200 mg/day in COPD., Methods: A pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to assess the efficacy of erdosteine, carbocysteine, and NAC on acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), duration of AECOPD, and hospitalization. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) was also investigated., Results: Data obtained from 2753 COPD patients were extracted from 7 RCTs published between 2004 and 2017. In the pairwise meta-analysis mucolytic/antioxidant agents significantly reduced the risk of AECOPD (RR 0.74 95%CI 0.68-0.80). The network meta-analysis provided the following rank of effectiveness: erdosteine>carbocysteine>NAC. Only erdosteine reduced the risk of experiencing at least one AECOPD (P < 0.01) and the risk of hospitalization due to AECOPD (P < 0.05). Erdosteine and NAC both significantly reduced the duration of AECOPD (P < 0.01). The AEs induced by erdosteine, carbocysteine, and NAC were mild in severity and generally well tolerated. The quality of evidence of this quantitative synthesis is moderate., Conclusions: The overall efficacy/safety profile of erdosteine is superior to that of both carbocysteine and NAC. Future head-to-head studies performed on the same COPD populations are needed to definitely confirm the results of this meta-analysis., Trial Registration: CRD42016053762 .

Objectives: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of lefamulin in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model to ascertain (i) which PK/PD index best correlates with efficacy and (ii) whether the magnitude of the index that drives efficacy varies for different pathogens., Methods: We evaluated the in vivo PK/PD of lefamulin against five Streptococcus pneumoniae and five Staphylococcus aureus strains using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. The relationships between bacterial burden in the thigh of normal and neutropenic mice after 24 h of lefamulin treatment and various PK/PD indices were determined., Results: The kinetics of the three doses was linear by AUC. Rate of killing was maximal at concentrations near the MIC; suppression of regrowth was dose dependent, with a post-antibiotic effect of 3.0-3.5 and 1.0-1.5 h against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, respectively. The efficacy of lefamulin correlated most strongly with the AUC0-24/MIC ratio; coefficient of determination was 79.9% for S. pneumoniae and 78.3% for S. aureus. The magnitude of the 24 h AUC/MIC of total drug required ranged from 9.92 to 32.1 for S. pneumoniae and 40.2 to 82.5 for S. aureus, corresponding to free drug values (∼20% free fraction) of 1.98-6.42 and 8.04-16.5, respectively., Conclusions: Lefamulin, the first systemically available pleuromutilin in humans, exhibits time- and concentration-dependent killing. The presence of white blood cells had only a slight effect in enhancing the activity of the drug, indicating a leucocyte-independent effect. The identified driver of efficacy, the AUC0-24/MIC ratio and the ratios determined against various S. aureus and S. pneumoniae strains, will inform further non-clinical and clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Objectives: To present results of preclinical studies that supported further development of lefamulin for treating patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)., Methods: The effect of bovine lung surfactant on the antibacterial activity of lefamulin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus was determined by broth microdilution assay. In vitro accumulation of lefamulin was evaluated in J774 mouse macrophages. Pharmacokinetics was assessed in female BALB/c (Bagg albino) mice treated with subcutaneous lefamulin (35 or 70 mg/kg). In neutropenic lung infection experiments, BALB/c mice received intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide before challenge with single S. pneumoniae or S. aureus strains; subcutaneous lefamulin (1.25-160 mg/kg) was given twice daily post-infection. Hill models described relationships between AUC/MIC ratios and changes in log10 cfu., Results: Lung surfactant did not significantly increase lefamulin MIC values against test strains. Lefamulin uptake in macrophages was rapid (a plateau was reached in ∼3 h). In mice, distribution of lefamulin [plasma to epithelial lining fluid (ELF)] was rapid, showing an ∼2-fold increase in lefamulin exposure in the ELF during the 5.5 h period. Median plasma AUC/MIC ratios associated with 1 and 2 log10 cfu reductions from baseline were 1.37 and 2.15, respectively, for S. pneumoniae and 2.13 and 6.24 for S. aureus. Corresponding ELF results were 14.0 and 22.0 for S. pneumoniae and 21.7 and 63.9 for S. aureus., Conclusions: Overall, lefamulin displays desirable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships that are predictive of the clinical effectiveness of lefamulin and other antibacterial agents used to treat CABP., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Cardiovascular disease affects more than 90 million Americans. Recent studies support an increased cardiovascular disease risk in inflammatory conditions, such as gout. Increased serum urate levels, or hyperuricemia, are a precursor to gout. Data from meta-analyses have shown hyperuricemia to be linked to hypertension and coronary heart disease. Similarly, gout has been associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and death from cardiovascular disease in randomized clinical trials. Urate-lowering therapy reduces serum urate and may decrease systemic inflammation, generation of oxidative species, and reverses endothelial dysfunction through hyperuricemia-dependent or hyperuricemia-independent pathways. Cardioprotective benefits of allopurinol, a first-line agent for the treatment of gout, have been demonstrated to potentially prevent myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and other cardiovascular diseases in observational studies in select populations. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also examined the role of newer urate-lowering therapies, such as febuxostat and lesinurad, and their risk of cardiovascular-specific mortality in comparison to allopurinol. A large post-marketing study of febuxostat vs. allopurinol showed higher all-cause and cardiovascular-specific mortality in the febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group; a major study limitation was that large numbers of patients were lost to follow-up or discontinued treatment. RCTs are required to assess the comparative effectiveness of urate-lowering therapies, validate findings of observational studies, and to determine which subgroup populations of gout are most likely to benefit from appropriate long-term urate-lowering therapy. This review examines the data for increased cardiovascular disease in gout and potential underlying mechanisms (including hyperuricemia, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress) and the effect of urate-lowering therapy on cardiovascular disease.

Lefamulin, the first semisynthetic pleuromutilin antibacterial for intravenous and oral treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), and comparators were evaluated for in vitro activity against a global collection of pathogens commonly causing CABP ( n = 8595) from the 2015 and 2016 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Lefamulin was highly active against the pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae , including multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant strains (MIC 50/90 for total and resistant subsets, 0.06/0.12 μg/ml; 100% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), Staphylococcus aureus , including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; both MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 μg/ml; 99.8% and 99.6% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml, respectively), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 μg/ml; 93.8% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 μg/ml; 100% inhibited at ≤0.25 μg/ml), and its activity was unaffected by resistance to other antibacterial classes., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

This study investigated the molecular mechanisms possibly associated with non-wild-type MICs for lefamulin among staphylococci and streptococci included in the lefamulin surveillance program from 2015 to 2016. A total of 2,919 Staphylococcus aureus , 276 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 3,923 Streptococcus pneumoniae , 389 β-hemolytic, and 178 viridans group streptococci isolates were included in the surveillance studies. Eleven (0.3% of all S. aureus ) S. aureus isolates with lefamulin MICs above the staphylococcal epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF) value (>0.25 μg/ml) were selected for this study. Eight (72.7%) S. aureus (lefamulin MIC, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml) isolates carried vga (A or E), one isolate (MIC, 32 μg/ml) carried lsa (E), one isolate (MIC, 16 μg/ml) had an alteration in L4, and one strain (MIC, 0.5 μg/ml) did not carry any of the investigated resistance mechanisms. A total of 14 (5.1% of all CoNS) CoNS isolates had lefamulin MICs (0.5 to >32 μg/ml) above the ECOFF. Similar to S. aureus , 8 (57.1%) CoNS (lefamulin MIC, 1 to 8 μg/ml) isolates carried vga (A or B), while 2 isolates (MIC, 4 to 32 μg/ml) carried cfr High genetic diversity was observed among staphylococci, although 3 S. aureus isolates belonged to sequence type 398 (ST398). Among the 3 Streptococcus agalactiae and 3 viridans group streptococci (0.1% of all streptococci surveyed) isolates selected for additional characterization, all but 1 isolate carried lsa (E). This study documents a low occurrence of surveillance isolates exhibiting a non-wild-type MIC for lefamulin, and among these isolates, vga and lsa (E) prevailed in staphylococci and streptococci, respectively., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Despite many effective treatments for gout, its management remains a challenge internationally. Options for optimizing gout management may differ in different practice sizes and settings. Gout incidence is rising and it continues to be associated with increased mortality. Education of patients and medical providers is essential, and newer gout medications need to be used in the most appropriate ways for cost-effective therapy. Special consideration needs to be given to such populations as the elderly and those with renal and cardiovascular disease in gout management. New agents are in development, which may add to the armamentarium for gout management., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lesinurad [Zurampic; 2-(5-bromo-4-(4-cyclopropylnaphthalen-1-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ylthio)], a selective inhibitor of uric acid reabsorption transporters approved for the treatment of gout, is a racemate of two atropisomers. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the stereoselectivity of metabolism, the inhibitory potency on kidney uric acid reabsorption transporters (URAT1 and OAT4), and the clinical pharmacokinetics of the lesinurad atropisomers. Incubations with human liver microsomes (HLM), recombinant CYP2C9, and recombinant CYP3A4 were carried out to characterize the stereoselective formation of three metabolites: M3 (hydroxylation), M4 (a dihydrodiol metabolite), and M6 (S-dealkylation). The formation of M3 in HLM with atropisomer 1 was approximately twice as much as that with atropisomer 2, whereas formation of M4 with atropisomer 1 was 8- to 12-fold greater than that with atropisomer 2. There were no significant differences in the plasma protein binding among lesinurad and the atropisomers. Following oral administration of 400 mg lesinurad once daily for 14 days to healthy human volunteers, the systemic exposure ( C max at steady state and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of dosing interval) of atropisomer 1 was approximately 30% lower than that of atropisomer 2, whereas renal clearance was similar. In vitro cell-based assays using HEK293 stable cells expressing URAT1 and OAT4 demonstrated that atropisomer 2 was approximately 4-fold more potent against URAT1 than atropisomer 1 and equally active against OAT4. In conclusion, lesinurad atropisomers showed stereoselectivity in clinical pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and inhibitory potency against URAT1., (Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Introduction: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) represents a significant clinical and financial burden within infectious disease. In the advent of increasing resistance from bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae to available antibiotic therapies, there is a need for new drugs with novel mechanisms to treat such infections. Areas covered: Lefamulin, the first semi-synthetic pleuromutilin for systemic administration, is nearing completion of Phase III studies for CABP; the manufacturer plans to file for a new drug application (NDA) in Q4 2018. This paper details available data on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, in vitro and clinical data of the drug to date, derived from published literature, conference posters and data provided by the manufacturer. Expert commentary: Lefamulin offers a unique spectrum of activity as a potential monotherapy treatment agent for CABP and alternative to fluoroquinolone therapy. The drug displays potent activity against several pathogens common in both acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and CABP, and a lack of cross-resistance with other antibiotic classes for S. pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Lefamulin has met predefined noninferiority endpoints of clinical response for CABP compared to moxifloxacin ± linezolid in two Phase III trials (LEAP 1 and 2) and presents an alternative therapy for CABP.

Gout is an increasingly common chronic disorder of urate crystal deposition that manifests as flares of acute inflammatory arthritis. Hyperuricaemia is a prerequisite and a fifth of both men and woman are hyperuricaemic. The prevalence of gout is much lower than the prevalence of hyperuricaemia for reasons that are not currently clear. Gout is more common in men than women prior to menopause due to the uricosuric effects of oestrogen, but after menopause the incidence of gout rises substantially in women. Co-morbidities are an important issue in gout, with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity and chronic kidney disease all common in patients with gout. Environmental factors like diet affect the incidence of gout but there is little evidence to support an emphasis on diet in treating established gout. The diagnosis of gout is often made without the use of joint aspiration and validated diagnostic rules are available for both primary and secondary care as well as classification criteria for research use. The overarching principle of the management of gout with pharmacotherapy is the need to reduce serum urate levels to below a target of 0.30 mmol/L or 0.36 mmol/L depending on whether it is tophaceous or non-tophaceous respectively. The use of allopurinol has been researched extensively and newer strategies for safer effective dosing are now recommended. Newer agents have been introduced for the treatment of gout, including febuxostat and lesinurad. A number of important questions in the field are under current investigation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dual urate-lowering therapy (ULT) with lesinurad in combination with either allopurinol or febuxostat is an option for patients with gout unsuccessfully treated on either monotherapy. Treatment failure is often a result of poor medication adherence. Imperfect adherence in clinical trials may lead to biased estimates of treatment effect and confound the results of cost-effectiveness analyses., Objectives: To estimate the impact of varying medication adherence on the cost effectiveness of lesinurad dual therapy and estimate the value-based price of lesinurad at which the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is equal to £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)., Methods: Treatment effect was simulated using published pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models and scenarios representing adherence in clinical trials, routine practice, and perfect use. The subsequent cost and health impacts, over the lifetime of a patient cohort, were estimated using a bespoke pharmacoeconomic model., Results: The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing lesinurad dual ULT with monotherapy ranged from £39,184 to £78,350/QALY gained using allopurinol and £31,901 to £124,212/QALY gained using febuxostat, depending on the assumed medication adherence. Results assuming perfect medication adherence imply a per-quarter value-based price of lesinurad of £45.14 when used in dual ULT compared with allopurinol alone and £57.75 compared with febuxostat alone, falling to £25.41 and £3.49, respectively, in simulations of worsening medication adherence., Conclusions: The estimated value-based prices of lesinurad only exceeded that which has been proposed in the United Kingdom when assuming both perfect drug adherence and the eradication of gout flares in sustained treatment responders., (Copyright © 2018 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Over the last 70 years, pharmacotherapy in gout with urate-lowering drugs has consisted of four drugs only: In 1952, a mild uricosuric probenecid became available, the xanthine oxidase inhibitor Allopurinol in 1964, and the latter became the most frequently used urate-lowering drug worldwide; in the Eurozone, the uricosuric benzbromarone was welcomed in 1977. Only in 2002, the potent non-purine xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat was introduced. In many countries, uricosurics such as probenecid and benzbromarone have not been available up to now, and these days, the new uricosuric lesinurad is the first uricosuric that may be introduced in these countries, which is the reason for describing the position this novel uricosuric deserves in treating gout. Recent literature will be shortly reviewed, and the current proposed position for lesinurad will be given as an aid for clinicians.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout., Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Patients or Participants: Five RCTs, which included 1959 patients, compared the efficacy and safety of lesinurad in patients with hyperuricemia associated with gout., Measurements and Results: Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size by using a random-effect model. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving target serum uric acid (sUA) levels by month 6 and the mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12. Gout-related outcomes were also assessed. The secondary outcome was the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Compared with xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) monotherapy, lesinurad 200 mg or 400 mg in combination with allopurinol or febuxostat exhibited a higher proportion of patients achieving target sUA levels of < 6.0 mg/dl or < 5.0 mg/dl, respectively, by month 6. Lesinurad-plus-XOI groups also significantly sustained lower mean sUA levels at month 6 and month 12 compared to XOI alone group. In gout-related outcomes, no significant treatment group differences favored lesinurad. The number of TEAEs was comparable between the lesinurad 200 mg-plus-XOI group and the XOI-monotherapy group. Although lesinurad 400 mg monotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo, significantly more TEAEs occurred., Conclusions: Although the combination of lesinurad 200 mg and XOI is effective and well tolerated for treating patients with gout who have not achieved an adequate response to XOI monotherapy, clinical gout-related outcomes were not improved. Therefore, additional studies investigating the long-term clinical implication of lesinurad are warranted., (© 2018 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Gout is the most common arthritic disease in human but was long neglected and therapeutic options are not satisfying. However, with the recent approval of the urate transporter inhibitor lesinurad, gout treatment has experienced a major innovation. Here we show that lesinurad possesses considerable modulatory potency on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). Since gout has a strong association with metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, this side-activity appears as very valuable contributing factor to the clinical efficacy profile of lesinurad. Importantly, despite robustly activating PPARγ in vitro, lesinurad lacked adipogenic activity, which seems due to differential coactivator recruitment and is characterized as selective PPARγ modulator (sPPARγM).

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of lesinurad, a selective uric acid uptake inhibitor, alone and in combination with the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol, on serum uric acid and urinary urate excretion in patients with gout and hyperuricemia. A phase 1b, multicenter, open-label, multiple-dose study was carried out in patients with gout with serum uric acid ≥8 mg/dL following washout of urate-lowering therapy. Patients were treated with allopurinol 300 mg/day alone in week 1; lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day was added in week 2, followed by lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day alone in week 3. Serum uric acid and urine uric acid were evaluated each week. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Lesinurad 400 or 600 mg/day added to allopurinol 300 mg/day reduced serum uric acid by 60% and 72%, respectively, versus allopurinol alone (37%) or lesinurad 400 mg/day (44%) or 600 mg/day (47%) alone. A 100% response rate of serum uric acid <6 mg/dL was achieved by all combinations (serum uric acid <5 mg/dL by 50%-90%). Mean 24-hour urate excretion compared with baseline was -35% with allopurinol, +36% and +56.5% with lesinurad 400 mg/day and 600 mg/day, respectively, and -11.6% and -7.1% with the respective combination therapies. Treatments were well tolerated. In this phase 1 trial, lesinurad added to allopurinol resulted in greater serum uric acid reduction than did allopurinol or lesinurad monotherapy., (© 2018, The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance have led to a global public health emergency requiring development of new antimicrobial classes. Lefamulin (formally BC-3781) is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic currently undergoing Food and Drug Administration review for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) as intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) formulations. Although pleuromutilin antibiotics were first developed in the 1950s, lefamulin is the first to be used for systemic treatment of bacterial infections in humans. Lefamulin exhibits a unique mechanism of action through inhibition of protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase center of the 50S bacterial ribosome, thus preventing the binding of transfer RNA for peptide transfer. Lefamulin displays activity against gram-positive and atypical organisms associated with CABP (i.e., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae), with an expanded gram-positive spectrum including Staphylococcus aureus (i.e., methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, and heterogeneous strains) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Lefamulin was also shown to retain activity against multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium. Lefamulin exhibits time-dependent killing, and the pharmacodynamic target best associated with antibacterial activity is ƒAUC 0-24 /MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]). Preclinical and phase II trials indicate that lefamulin concentrates in lung tissue are well tolerated at an IV dose of 150 mg twice/day over 1 hour or a PO dose of 600 mg twice/day, and preliminary phase III data suggest similar efficacy when compared with moxifloxacin with or without linezolid in CABP. Documented resistance and cross-resistance with other gram-positive antibacterials remains low. Additional published in vitro, in vivo, and preclinical trial data suggest further exploration of lefamulin in various infectious disease states (e.g., acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and sexually transmitted infections). This review discusses the pertinent bacterial spectrum of activity, preclinical and ongoing clinical data, and potential roles in therapy for lefamulin., (© 2018 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Aim: To estimate budget impact of adopting lesinurad as add-on to allopurinol for urate-lowering therapy in gout. Methods: A budget impact model was developed for a US payer perspective, using a Markov model to estimate costs, survival and discontinuation in a one-million-member health plan. The population included patients failing first-line gout therapy, followed for 5 years. Results: Incremental costs of adding lesinurad versus no lesinurad were US$241,907 and US$1,098,220 in first and fifth years, respectively. Cumulative 5-year incremental cost was US$3,633,440. Estimated incremental mean cost per treated patient with gout per year was US$112. The mean per-member per-month cost increased by US$0.06. Conclusion: Initiating lesinurad would result in an incremental per-member per-month cost of US$0.06 over 5 years.

Background: Until very recently the only therapeutic alternative for the management of patients affected by gout/hyperuricemia that did not respond to a first-line treatment based on allopurinol alone or who cannot tolerate allopurinol was febuxostat, a xanthine oxidase non-purine-selective inhibitor. Lately, however, a new therapeutic alternative has become available for the management of this pathology: lesinurad, a urate transporter inhibitor., Objective: To objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of lesinurad/allopurinol in comparison with febuxostat as a second-line therapeutic strategy for the management of patients affected by gout and hyperuricemia that did not respond to a first-line therapy based on allopurinol alone., Methods: A Markov model was built based on the natural history of the pathology; patients entered the model according to their level of serum uric acid concentration and flowed across it according to their response to the therapy. The analysis was carried out considering the perspective of the Italian National Health Service on a lifetime horizon and 6-month cycles. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at a 3.5% yearly rate. The results of the model were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Both a one-way and a multi-way Monte-Carlo analysis were carried out in order to check the robustness of the results achieved., Results: The ICER derived from the comparison was equal to €77.53/QALY on the lifetime horizon, as there was a higher level of costs associated with the combination as compared with febuxostat (€10,658.27 vs. €10,645.87, for a differential of €12.40) and a higher level of QALYs achieved (7.77 vs. 7.61, for a differential of 0.16)., Conclusions: The lesinurad/allopurinol combination is recommended for the treatment of patients affected by gout/hyperuricemia in the Italian Health System as it appears to be cost effective and thus sustainable for the Italian healthcare sector.

Purpose of Review: To discuss recent studies of lesinurad and arhalofenate., Recent Findings: Lesinurad acts by blocking urate reabsorption channels URAT-1 and OAT-4. It has urate-lowering effect when used alone and in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). Its uricosuric activity depends on glomerular filtration, and its' efficacy is impaired at eGFR less than 30 ml/min. Lesinurad monotherapy (400 mg/day) associates with serum creatinine elevations. However, this risk is substantially attenuated with coprescription of a XOI and when prescribed at a dose of 200 mg/day. Given its' modest urate-lowering effect, and the risk of serum creatinine elevation when used alone, it is licenced for use in combination with XOI for people unable to achieve target serum uric acid with XOI alone. Lesinurad does not have the drug interactions associated with probenecid, however, it is metabolized by CYP2C9, and should be used with caution if CYP2C9 inhibitors are coprescribed. Arhalofenate also acts by blocking URAT-1; however, it also blocks the NALP-3 inflammasome providing gout-specific anti-inflammatory effect. Arhalofenate has a weaker urate-lowering effect than lesinurad and further phase III evaluation is planned., Summary: Lesinurad provides an additional option for people with gout unable to achieve target serum uric acid with XOI alone.

To provide insight into pharmacological treatment of hyperuricemia we developed a semi-mechanistic, dynamical model of uric acid (UA) disposition in human. Our model represents the hyperuricemic state in terms of production of UA (rate, PUA), its renal filtration (glomerular filtration rate, GFR) and proximal tubular reabsorption (fractional excretion coefficient, FE). Model parameters were estimated using data from 9 Phase I studies of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI) allopurinol and febuxostat and a novel uricosuric, the selective UA reabsorption inhibitor lesinurad, approved for use in combination with a XOI. The model was qualified for prediction of the effect of patients' GFR and FE on concentration of UA in serum (sUA) and UA excretion in urine and their response to drug treatment, using data from 2 Phase I and 4 Phase III studies of lesinurad. Percent reduction in sUA from baseline by a XOI is predicted to be independent of GFR, FE or PUA. Uricosurics are more effective in underexcreters of UA or patients with normal GFR. Co-administration of a XOI and an uricosuric agent should be considered for patients with high sUA first in the treatment algorithm of gout before uptitration of XOI. The XOI dose in combination with a uricosuric can be reduced compared to XOI alone for the same target sUA to the degree dependent on patient's GFR and FE. This exposure-response model of UA can be used to rationally select the best drug treatment option to lower elevated sUA in gout patients under differing pathophysiological situations., (© 2018 Astra Zeneca. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.)

A previous meta-analysis suggested that the treatment with erdosteine was associated with significant amelioration of the cumulative global efficacy index and symptoms in comparison to placebo or other mucolytics. However, this conclusion was criticized because the meta-analysis, as it had been done, made it impossible to preclude the potential operation of selection biases within and across trials, and identify any realised benefits of an individual patient data approach. Taking into consideration these criticisms and also the publication of two further recent articles focused on the prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations with erdosteine, we have carried out a quantitative synthesis via meta-analysis of the currently available data on the use of this drug. Our findings included data from ten studies involving 1278 patients and show that erdosteine is able to improve the clinical score of patients with chronic bronchitis and COPD, and also reduces the overall risk of chronic bronchitis/COPD exacerbations, and reduces the risk of experiencing at least one exacerbation. Furthermore, our data suggest that erdosteine can lengthen the time to the first COPD exacerbation, reduce the duration of a COPD exacerbation and the risk of hospitalization from COPD. The documented effect of erdosteine in reducing the occurence and/or influencing COPD exacerbations is important because it indicates that erdosteine can be added to the list of drugs that can be recommended for treating COPD., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)