Search

Supplementary Methods, Figure Legend from Optical Detection of Buccal Epithelial Nanoarchitectural Alterations in Patients Harboring Lung Cancer: Implications for Screening

We have recently developed a novel optical technology, partial wave spectroscopic (PWS) microscopy, which is exquisitely sensitive to the nanoarchitectural manifestation of the genetic/epigenetic alterations of field carcinogenesis. Our approach was to screen for lung cancer by assessing the cheek cells based on emerging genetic/epigenetic data which suggests that the buccal epithelium is altered in lung field carcinogenesis. We performed PWS analysis from microscopically normal buccal epithelial brushings from smokers with and without lung cancer (n = 135). The PWS parameter, disorder strength of cell nanoarchitecture (Ld), was markedly (>50%) elevated in patients harboring lung cancer compared with neoplasia-free smokers. The performance characteristic was excellent with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of >0.80 and was equivalent for both disease stage (early versus late) and histologies (small cell versus non–small cell lung cancers). An independent data set validated the findings with only a minimal degradation of performance characteristics. Our results offer proof of concept that buccal PWS may potentially herald a minimally intrusive prescreening test that could be integral to the success of lung cancer population screening programs. Cancer Res; 70(20); 7748–54. ©2010 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1 from Optical Detection of Buccal Epithelial Nanoarchitectural Alterations in Patients Harboring Lung Cancer: Implications for Screening

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 represents a grave risk to residents in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether establishment of an appropriate-use committee was associated with a reduction in SNF utilization. DESIGNS, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a multihospital integrated health system in northern Illinois. Participants were patients hospitalized from March 19, 2019, to July 16, 2020. INTERVENTION: Creation of a multidisciplinary committee to assess appropriateness of discharge to SNF following hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was total discharges to SNFs. Secondary outcomes were new discharges to SNFs, readmissions, length of stay (LOS), and COVID-19 incidence following discharge. RESULTS: Matched populations pre and post intervention were each 4424 patients. Post intervention, there was a relative reduction in total SNF discharges of 49.7% (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38-0.47) and in new SNF discharges of 66.9% (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.34). Differences in readmissions and LOS were not statistically significant. For patients discharged to a SNF, 2.99% (95% CI, 1.59%-4.39%) developed COVID-19 within 30 days, compared with 0.26% (95% CI, 0.29%-0.93%) of patients discharged to other settings (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a review committee to assess for appropriateness of SNF use after a hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic is highly effective. There was no negative impact on safety or efficiency of hospital care, and reduced SNF use likely prevented several cases of COVID-19. This model could serve as a template for other hospitals to reduce the risks of COVID-19 in SNFs and as part of a value-based care strategy.

Purpose This study aims to develop a multi-gene assay predictive of the clinical benefits of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and substantiate their protein expression as potential therapeutic targets. Patients and methods The mRNA expression of 160 genes identified from microarray was analyzed in qRT-PCR assays of independent 337 snap-frozen NSCLC tumors to develop a predictive signature. A clinical trial JBR.10 was included in the validation. Hazard ratio was used to select genes, and decision-trees were used to construct the predictive model. Protein expression was quantified with AQUA in 500 FFPE NSCLC samples. Results A 7-gene signature was identified from training cohort (n = 83) with accurate patient stratification (P = 0.0043) and was validated in independent patient cohorts (n = 248, P, Highlights • This paper develops a RT-PCR based 7-gene assay to predict the clinical benefits of chemotherapy for precision oncology • This work discovers a prognostic protein biomarker ZNF71 using AQUA technique as a potential companion test and therapeutic target • This research identifies prognostic mRNA and protein biomarker CD27 with implications in immunotherapy The results from this paper will help clinicians to select NSCLC patients who might benefit from chemotherapy. The identified prognostic protein biomarkers might also be new therapeutic targets in chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Introduction The sequence of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab may affect antitumor immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy. Methods This multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of two sequences of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with stage 4 NSCLC. Both arms were considered investigational, and the study used a “pick a winner” design. The primary end point was objective response rate by independent radiologic review after eight cycles (24 wk). Patients were randomized 1:1 to arm A (chemotherapy for four cycles followed by pembrolizumab for four cycles) or arm B (pembrolizumab for four cycles followed by chemotherapy for four cycles). Patients in both arms without disease progression after the initial eight cycles continued pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 2 years. Results From March 2016 to July 2018, a total of 90 eligible patients were randomized (43 patients to arm A and 47 patients to arm B). The objective response rate at 24 weeks in arms A and B was 39.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 24.9%–54.1 %) and 40.4 % (95 % CI: 26.4%–54.5 %), respectively (p = 0.93). The progression-free survival in arms A and B was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.68–1.66, p value equals to 0.84, and median progression-free survival of 5.8 months and 4 months, respectively. The overall survival was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.63–1.74, p value equals to 0.85, and median overall survival of 15.5 months and 14 months, respectively. Conclusions Additional evaluation of either sequence in a phase 3 trial is not warranted.

// Shalin Shah 1, * , Kevin Wood 2, * , Brian Labadie 2 , Brian Won 2 , Ryan Brisson 2 , Theodore Karrison 3 , Thomas Hensing 2 , Mark Kozloff 2 , Riyue Bao 4 , Jyoti D. Patel 2 and Jason J. Luke 2 1 Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystems, Chicago, IL, USA 2 Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 3 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, USA 4 Center for Research Informatics and Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Jason J. Luke, email: jluke@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer; anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; acquired resistance; immunotherapy; innate resistance Received: September 04, 2017 Accepted: December 08, 2017 Published: December 15, 2017 ABSTRACT Hypothesis: The majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy develop either innate or acquired resistance. Across tumor types, the "T cell-inflamed" tumor microenvironment correlates with clinical response to immunotherapy. We hypothesize that clinical characteristics may be predictive of resistance and that "T cell-inflamed" NSCLC tumors can be identified by gene expression profiling. Results: Of 93 patients, 36 (38.7%) had innate resistance and 57 (61.3%) had initial benefit to immunotherapy. Innate resistance was associated with non-smokers ( p = 0.013), more involved disease sites ( p = 0.011), more prior therapy ( p = 0.001), and a lower albumin level ( p = 0.014). Among patients with initial benefit, factors associated with subsequent progression-free survival included higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ( p = 0.004) and lower depth of response to anti-PD-1 therapy ( p = 0.003). A "T cell-inflamed" microenvironment was identified in 42% of TCGA adenocarcinoma samples versus 21.0% of squamous cell. Discussion: Specific clinical characteristics appear to be predictive of either innate or acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. A "T cell-inflamed" tumor was more common in adenocarcinoma than squamous histology. Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients with innate resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (defined as progression at first CT evaluation) were compared to patients with initial clinical benefit. Among those with initial clinical benefit, we identified prognostic factors for time to progression (acquired resistance) or death. To further corroborate our findings on limited numbers, immune gene expression profiling of all NSCLC samples from the TCGA database was also pursued.

As epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in approximately 90% of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN), several therapeutic agents that target EGFR have been evaluated for the treatment of SCCHN. Although patients with SCCHN derive clinical benefit from anti-EGFR agents, most notably the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab, these patients eventually become resistant to EGFR-based therapies; preclinical studies have shown activation of secondary signaling pathways that lead to resistance to EGFR inhibition and, as such, serve as potential therapeutic targets to overcome resistance to EGFR inhibitors.This review summarizes the results of recently completed trials of anti-EGFR agents in SCCHN, highlights the various mechanisms that drive resistance to EGFR inhibitors in SCCHN, and focuses on several novel targeted agents that could potentially help overcome resistance to EGFR-based therapies in SCCHN. Expert commentary: Due to the development of resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies, novel treatment approaches to overcome resistance are a key unmet need for SCCHN.

This study reviews extensive genetic analysis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in order to: describe how targetable mutation genes interrelate with the genes identified as variants of unknown significance; assess the percentage of patients with a potentially targetable genetic alterations; evaluate the percentage of patients who had concurrent alterations, previously considered to be mutually exclusive; and characterize the molecular subset of KRAS. Thoracic Oncology Research Program Databases at the University of Chicago provided patient demographics, pathology, and results of genetic testing. 364 patients including 289 adenocarcinoma underwent genotype testing by various platforms such as FoundationOne, Caris Molecular Intelligence, and Response Genetics Inc. For the entire adenocarcinoma cohort, 25% of patients were African Americans; 90% of KRAS mutations were detected in smokers, including current and former smokers; 46% of EGFR and 61% of ALK alterations were detected in never smokers. 99.4% of patients, whose samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), had genetic alterations identified with an average of 10.8 alterations/tumor throughout different tumor subtypes. However, mutations were not mutually exclusive. NGS in this study identified potentially targetable genetic alterations in the majority of patients tested, detected concurrent alterations and provided information on variants of unknown significance at this time but potentially targetable in the future.

251 Background: A significant number of cancer-directed therapies are associated with cardiotoxicity. This adverse effect is well-established in anthracyclines and anti-HER2 agents. At our ambulatory oncology practice, the recent availability of echocardiograms with strain imaging has prompted an evaluation of current practices for cardiotoxicity monitoring. A review of the electronic health record (EHR) in 2019 found that although our institution maintains high rates of baseline monitoring, follow-up monitoring is not standardized and not consistent between different practices. Methods: A multidisciplinary team was formed to conduct a quality improvement project with the aim of increasing the rate of follow-up monitoring in patients who receive anthracyclines or infusional anti-HER2 agents. A survey of providers identified the potential reasons that follow-up cardiac monitoring was not completed. A Pareto chart showed that lack of familiarity with clinical necessity and appropriate timing were the most common barriers to follow-up monitoring. Our first plan-do-study-act focused on addressing these barriers, and a pilot in breast cancer treatment plans was started. Cardiac monitoring orders were added to curative intent protocols containing doxorubicin, trastuzumab, or pertuzumab. Education was provided to physician and nursing teams regarding utility and timing of cardiotoxicity monitoring. Collaboration with the cardiology group ensured timely access and result turnaround time. Results: An initial review of the EHR was conducted to identify current trends in cardiac monitoring. The review showed that there was an increase in the use of echocardiograms with strain imaging for baseline and follow-up monitoring in our patients. From January to April 2020, there was a total of 102 echocardiogram orders which was a 23% increase compared to the same timeframe in the previous year. The majority (61%) of those echocardiogram orders included strain imaging compared to 8% in the previous year. Review of treatment plan utilization and appropriate timing of cardiac monitoring in breast cancer patients is ongoing. Conclusions: This quality improvement project suggests that efforts to standardize cardiac monitoring practices can be achieved through provider education and workflow modifications. Further long-term review of the EHR will be needed to determine whether the timing of follow-up monitoring is appropriate and to identify what changes to the intervention should be made.

There have been significant advances in the understanding of the biology and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past few years. A number of molecularly targeted agents are in the clinic or in development for patients with advanced NSCLC (Table 1). We are beginning to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance following exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with oncogene addicted NSCLC. The advent of next generation sequencing has enabled to study comprehensively genomic alterations in lung cancer. Finally, early results from immune checkpoint inhibitors are very encouraging. This review summarizes recent advances in the area of cancer genomics, targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

Despite American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommending that oncologists discuss advance care planning (ACP) with patients with stage IV cancer early in treatment, in standard practice ACP remains a late step of a terminal illness. ACP preserves comfort and dignity at the end of life, ensuring patients receive the care that they desire.A feasibility study in patients with stage IV cancer was developed to test whether incorporating ACP immediately after a stage IV cancer diagnosis is feasible. Inclusion criteria were consecutive new gastrointestinal and thoracic oncology patients treated by one of two oncologists. The project included creation of new workflow; development of an ACP patient education guidebook; training seminars for oncology staff; and enhancements to the electronic health record (EHR) to improve ACP documentation.The oncologists recorded 33 of 48 (69%) advance directive notes (ADNs) and 22 of 48 (46%) code status orders (CSOs) in the EHR of patients newly diagnosed with stage IV cancer by following ACP protocol during the 6-month trial period. Twenty-one of 33 ADNs were entered within 7 days of first consultation. The median time to ADN placement was 1 day after consultation. Twenty-two of 33 patients with ADNs had CSOs placed, of which 16 were do-not-resuscitate (DNR) and 6 were full code. One year prior to the feasibility study, only 1 of 75 deceased patients of the two oncologists had outpatient ADNs and CSOs.Outpatient ACP is feasible early in the care of patients with stage IV cancer through systematic improvement in workflow and motivated providers. Education and infrastructure were pivotal to routine development of advance care plans.

Introduction: Approximately 70% of lung adenocarcinomas express TTF-1. EGFR mutations are present in 13-15% of Western adenocarcinoma patients. This paper investigates TTF1 as a negative predictor of mutant EGFR in lung adenocarcinomas. Results: In the pilot cohort (N = 301) two of 224 specimens positive for EGFR mutations had negative TTF-1 expression (sensitivity 99.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 96.8-99.9%). Estimated negative predictive values (NPV) for EGFR mutation prevalence rates of 13% and 15% are 99.5% (95% credible interval (CRI) 98.6%99.9%) and 99.4% (CRI – 98.4%-99.9%). For EGFR mutation rates of 13% and 15%, using validation cohort data (211 patients), the estimated NPVs were 97% (95% CRI 92%-99%) and 96% (95% CRI 91%-99%). Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors from lung adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for EGFR mutations by allele-specific PCR in the ‘pilot cohort’. TTF-1 status was documented as positive or negative. Negative predictive value (NPV) for a range of true prevalence of EGFR mutation (1%-50%) was estimated using Bayesian modeling. The hypothesis was validated in a separate ‘validation’ cohort using the same modeling. Conclusion: An overwhelming majority of TTF-1 negative adenocarcinomas will be negative for EGFR mutations. This finding allows for earlier initiation of chemotherapy in newly diagnosed TTF-1 negative adenocarcinomas of the lung with stage IV disease.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to be reliable early biomarkers in a variety of cancers including that of lung. We ascertained whether the biomarker potential of miRNAs could be validated in microscopically normal and easily accessible buccal epithelial brushings from cigarette smokers as a consequence of lung cancer linked ‘field carcinogenesis’. We found that compared to neoplasia-free subjects, a panel of 68 miRNAs were upregulated and 3 downregulated in the normal appearing buccal mucosal cells collected from patients harboring lung cancer (n=76). The performance characteristics of selected miRNAs (with ≥1-fold change) were excellent with an average under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of >0.80. Several miRNAs also displayed gender specificity between the groups. These results provide the first proof-of-concept scenario in which minimally intrusive cheek brushings could provide an initial screening tool in a large at-risk population.

Lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Both histologically and molecularly lung cancer is heterogeneous. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the pathways involved in the various types of lung cancer with an emphasis on the clinical implications of the increasing number of actionable molecular targets. It describes the major pathways and molecular alterations implicated in the development and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (adenocarcinoma and squamous cancer), and of small cell carcinoma, emphasizing the molecular alterations comprising the specific blueprints in each group. The approved and investigational targeted therapies as well as the immune therapies, and clinical trials exploring the variety of targeted approaches to treatment of lung cancer are the main focus of this review.

e14128 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are changing the landscape of treatment in oncology. The use of ICIs is growing rapidly as the indications for these medications broaden and new ICIs become approved. Given the rapid growth and relative infancy of the use of ICIs, much information stands to be gained on their use in the clinical practice setting, especially regarding toxicity. Methods: The primary objective of this project was to examine the incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), after treatment with single-agent or combination ICIs at a multi-site community cancer center. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who had received ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or ipilimumab plus nivolumab from May 1, 2011 to June 30, 2017. Data collected included patient demographics, disease state, treatment information, preexisting autoimmune disease, previous immunotherapy, and adverse event details. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Data was collected on 383 patients. Dermatologic irAEs were common across single agent ICIs (overall incidence 23%). Diarrhea and/or colitis incidence was highest with CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab (26% at 3 mg/kg and 22% at 10 mg/kg) versus the other monotherapy PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors. Endocrinopathies were most common with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg (55%) and pneumonitis incidence was highest with nivolumab (6%). ICI toxicity occurred in 63% of patients with preexisting autoimmune disease versus 54% of those without a baseline autoimmune disease. Incidence of hospitalization and treatment holds due to irAEs was higher with combination therapy (57% and 66%, respectively) than with monotherapy (10% and 24%, respectively). Conclusions: Overall, there was increased incidence in ICI toxicity in patients at this oncology institution versus what has been reported in clinical trials. Patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases appeared to have mainly low-grade toxicities with slightly increased incidence of irAE compared with those without pre-existing autoimmune disease. Treatment holds and hospitalizations were higher in patients treated with combination therapy ICIs compared to monotherapy ICIs.

9088 Background: KEYNOTE-024 established single-agent P as a 1st-line option for pts with metastatic NSCLC without targetable alterations and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. KEYNOTE-189 and 407 established concurrent C + P as a treatment option irrespective of PD-L1 expression. In this randomized phase II selection trial, we explored sequencing of C and P in this pt. population. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to (arm A) C (carboplatin (AUC 6) + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (non-squamous) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (squamous)) x 4 cycles followed by P 200 mg x 4 cycles, or the reverse sequence (arm B) of P x 4 cycles followed by C x 4 cycles. After 8 cycles, pts on both arms were eligible to receive maintenance P for up to 24 months. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints were also evaluated by PD-L1 expression. Results: 89 pts (47 arm B & 42 arm A) were enrolled and are included in the analysis (PD-L1 TPS 0/1-49%/≥50% = 24 pts (34%)/25 pts (36%)/21 pts (30%)). There was no significant difference in ORR (36% vs 38%, p = 0.829), median PFS (2.7 vs 5.5 months (mo), HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77-2.02, p = 0.363) or OS (13.1 vs 19.8 mo, HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69-2.25, p = 0.4573), arm B (Px4→C) vs arm A (Cx4→P). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated significant interaction between treatment and PD-L1 TPS ( < 50% vs ≥ 50%) for PFS (HR 6.76, 95% CI 2.14-21.35, p = 0.0011) and a trend for OS (HR 5.02, 95% CI 0.92-27.55, p = 0.0632), arm B vs arm A. Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 71% for arm A and 65% for arm B. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In pts with stage IV NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% there was an observed improvement in PFS and OS in favor of C followed by P vs P x 4 followed by C. Given small # of pts and trial design, this observation should be considered hypothesis-generating, but supports further exploration of sequential C + P in this setting. Support:Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Clinical trial information: NCT02591615.

e14088 Background: The checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy class of drugs is redefining how we treat cancer. The US FDA has approved CPI drugs as 1st, 2nd or salvage line after progression on conventional chemotherapy (CTX) for multiple cancers including melanoma, lung, bladder and other cancers. However, many questions remain regarding optimal treatment post-progression. Indeed, it has been noted that the patterns of response and relapse to CPI agents are quite different from those of standard cytotoxic agents and that response to CTX AFTER CPI may be different than in the de novo setting. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the activity (response rate (RR), response duration (DOR) and progression free survival (PFS)) of subsequent CTX after disease progression following treatment with CPI. Methods: In this analysis, patients (pts) were enrolled under an IRB approved waiver of consent. We identified pts treated with CPI agents between Jan, 2011 and Dec, 2018 at a multi-site community cancer program who received subsequent CTX as a result of disease progression (PD). We assessed the RECIST RR to subsequent therapy, DOR from onset of response, and PFS from the onset of post CPI CTX, identifying index lesions from the most recent pre-treatment anatomic scan. Results: A total of 47 cases satisfying the above criteria were found; 31 NSCLC, 8 melanoma, 1 SCLC, 1 GEJ, 1 gastric, 2 head/neck, 1 large cell neuroendocrine tumor, 2 bladder cancer. 25 pts had PD as best response to post-CPI CTX. 9 pts (19%) achieved a partial response (PR) with a median DOR of 99 days. 22 pts achieved a PR or stable disease (SD) for a clinical benefit (CB) rate of 47%. The median duration of CB was 92 days. Of the 9 patients who achieved PR, 5/6 had achieved response to CTX prior to CPI . The median PFS for the entire cohort was 97 days. Conclusions: While an expected RR could not be calculated in this heterogenous group of pts, the number and degree of responses suggests CPI possible “priming” that may enhance response to CTX. Post-CPI CTX may be of value and in this retrospective study of a heterogenous group of pts, responses may be more frequent than expected. A larger further study is warranted.

Lessons Learned Adding docetaxel to the modified FOLFOX7 backbone (DOF) is a feasible three-drug combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer with high activity, providing evidence that leucovorin is not necessary in this setting. The DOF regimen represents an alternative to the FLOT (5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 as 24-hour infusion with leucovorin 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, and docetaxel 50 mg/m2) regimen that can be considered in select patients with advanced gastric cancer and is a potential choice in the curative setting. Background The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrates high response rates in advanced gastric cancer, albeit with increased toxicity. Given the efficacy of platinum-taxane-fluoropyrimidine regimens, this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU (DOF) for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods Patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with no prior therapy for metastatic disease received docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion over 46 hours; cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Results Forty-four patients were enrolled. Assessment of treatment response and toxicity was feasible in 41 and 43 patients, respectively. ORR was 73.2% (68.3% partial response; 4.9% complete response). Therapy was discontinued for progressive disease in 53%, toxicity in 26%, and death on treatment in 16%. Two patients underwent surgical resection. Thirty-three patients (76.7%) received at least seven cycles (7–34). Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in 31 patients (72.1%), including neutropenia (23.3%), neurologic (20.9%), and diarrhea (14.0%). Median overall survival was 10.3 months. Conclusion DOF demonstrates a high response rate, expected safety profile, and prolonged survival and remains an option for select patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Purpose Survival of patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unsatisfactory, and in 2002, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not established. This phase III study assessed the impact of postoperative adjuvant gefitinib on overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods Patients with completely resected (stage IB, II, or IIIA) NSCLC stratified by stage, histology, sex, postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg per day or placebo for 2 years. Study end points were OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity. Results As a result of early closure, 503 of 1,242 planned patients were randomly assigned (251 to gefitinib and 252 to placebo). Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. With a median of 4.7 years of follow-up (range, 0.1 to 6.3 years), there was no difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.64; P = .14) or DFS (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.61; P = .15) between the arms. Exploratory analyses demonstrated no DFS (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.76; P = .14) or OS benefit (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.71; P = .18) from gefitinib for 344 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type tumors. Similarly, there was no DFS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.44 to 7.73; P = .395) or OS benefit (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.61 to 16.45; P = .15) from gefitinib for the 15 patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors. Adverse events were those expected with an EGFR inhibitor. Serious adverse events occurred in ≤ 5% of patients, except infection, fatigue, and pain. One patient in each arm had fatal pneumonitis. Conclusion Although the trial closed prematurely and definitive statements regarding the efficacy of adjuvant gefitinib cannot be made, these results indicate that it is unlikely to be of benefit.

The Landmark National Lung Screening Trial established the potential for low dose CT screening (LDCT) to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality in high-risk patients as defined by smoking history and age. However, the prevalence of lung cancer in asymptomatic smokers selected based on the NLST criteria is low. Recent advances have facilitated biomarker discovery for early diagnosis of lung cancer through the analysis of surrogate tissues, including airway epithelium, sputum, exhaled breath, and blood. Although a number of candidate diagnostic biomarkers have been described, none have been validated for use in the clinical setting. The NLST ACRIN biomarker repository is a valuable resource of annotated biological specimens that were collected during the NLST trial, which has the potential to facilitate validation of candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis identified in discovery trials. It will be important to perform retrospective and prospective analysis of biomarkers to screen for lung cancer. The review below summarizes some of our understanding of biomarkers in screening. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;108:327–333. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Objective: An increasing amount of clinical data is available to biomedical researchers, but specifically designed database and informatics infrastructures are needed to handle this data effectively. Multiple research groups should be able to pool and share this data in an efficient manner. The Chicago Thoracic Oncology Database Consortium (CTODC) was created to standardize data collection and facilitate the pooling and sharing of data at institutions throughout Chicago and across the world. We assessed the CTODC by conducting a proof of principle investigation on lung cancer patients who took erlotinib. This study does not look into epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but rather it discusses the development and utilization of the database involved. Methods: We have implemented the Thoracic Oncology Program Database Project (TOPDP) Microsoft Access, the Thoracic Oncology Research Program (TORP) Velos, and the TORP REDCap databases for translational research efforts. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) were created to document the construction and proper utilization of these databases. These SOPs have been made available freely to other institutions that have implemented their own databases patterned on these SOPs. Results: A cohort of 373 lung cancer patients who took erlotinib was identified. The EGFR mutation statuses of patients were analyzed. Out of the 70 patients that were tested, 55 had mutations while 15 did not. In terms of overall survival and duration of treatment, the cohort demonstrated that EGFR-mutated patients had a longer duration of erlotinib treatment and longer overall survival compared to their EGFR wild-type counterparts who received erlotinib. Discussion: The investigation successfully yielded data from all institutions of the CTODC. While the investigation identified challenges, such as the difficulty of data transfer and potential duplication of patient data, these issues can be resolved with greater cross-communication between institutions of the consortium. Conclusion: The investigation described herein demonstrates the successful data collection from multiple institutions in the context of a collaborative effort. The data presented here can be utilized as the basis for further collaborative efforts and/or development of larger and more streamlined databases within the consortium.

Introduction This study assessed activity and safety of linifanib (ABT-869), a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Methods In this open-label trial (NCT00517790), patients who received one to two prior lines of systemic therapy were randomized to oral linifanib 0.10 mg/kg (low dose) or 0.25 mg/kg (high dose) once daily. Tumor responses were assessed by independent central imaging review every 8 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free rate at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included objective response rate, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. Results Between August 2007 and October 2008, 139 patients were enrolled; 60% had two or more prior regimens, and 88% had nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The objective response rate (low dose and high dose) was 5.0% (3.1 and 6.8%), progression-free rate at 16 weeks was 33.1% (32.3 and 33.8%), median time to progression was 3.6 months (3.6 and 3.7 months), median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (3.5 and 3.6 months), and median overall survival was 9.0 months (10.0 and 8.3 months). The most common linifanib-related adverse events were fatigue (42%), decreased appetite (38%), hypertension (37%), diarrhea (32%), nausea (27%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (24%), and proteinuria (22%). These events were more common in the high-dose group. The most common linifanib-related grade 3 or 4 adverse event was hypertension (14%). Conclusions Linifanib is active in advanced non-small cell lung cancer as second- or third-line therapy. Increased adverse event rates were observed at the high dose of linifanib.

Lung cancer is a heterogenous group of disorders, and a difficult disease to treat. The traditional approach of surgical resection for early-stage disease, potentially followed by chemotherapy, as well chemotherapy (with or without radiation) in later stages of disease is being supplemented with a personalized approach. The personalized approach has classically been used by the oncologist based on clinical/pathological parameters such as the performance status of the patient and histology of lung cancer. As molecular mechanisms have been explored in lung cancer more recently, the personalized approach also has incorporated molecular abnormalities. In particular, EGFR, K-ras, ALK, MET, CBL, and COX2, have come to the forefront as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Thus, we review the various molecular mechanisms in lung cancer and the role of novel therapeutics.

There were over 220,000 people diagnosed with lung cancer and over 160,000 people dying of lung cancer during 2010 alone in the United States. In order to arrive at better control, prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutics for lung cancer, we must be able to personalize the approach towards the disease. Mind-mapping has existed for centuries for physicians to properly think about various "flows" of personalized medicine. We include here the epidemiology, diagnosis, histology, and treatment of lung cancer-in particular, non-small cell lung cancer. As we have new molecular signatures for lung cancer, this is further detailed. This review is not meant to be a comprehensive review, but rather its purpose is to highlight important aspects of lung cancer diagnosis, management, and personalized treatment options.

We have recently developed a novel optical technology, partial wave spectroscopic (PWS) microscopy, which is exquisitely sensitive to the nanoarchitectural manifestation of the genetic/epigenetic alterations of field carcinogenesis. Our approach was to screen for lung cancer by assessing the cheek cells based on emerging genetic/epigenetic data which suggests that the buccal epithelium is altered in lung field carcinogenesis. We performed PWS analysis from microscopically normal buccal epithelial brushings from smokers with and without lung cancer (n = 135). The PWS parameter, disorder strength of cell nanoarchitecture (Ld), was markedly (>50%) elevated in patients harboring lung cancer compared with neoplasia-free smokers. The performance characteristic was excellent with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of >0.80 and was equivalent for both disease stage (early versus late) and histologies (small cell versus non–small cell lung cancers). An independent data set validated the findings with only a minimal degradation of performance characteristics. Our results offer proof of concept that buccal PWS may potentially herald a minimally intrusive prescreening test that could be integral to the success of lung cancer population screening programs. Cancer Res; 70(20); 7748–54. ©2010 AACR.

38 Background: To meet Commission on Cancer accreditation requirements, cancer programs must implement processes to monitor the dissemination of survivorship care plans (SCP) for patients with Stages I-III cancers who were treated with curative intent and completed active therapy. Challenges of SCP delivery across disease sites include lack of designated/trained staff, time burden, knowledge of current evidence-based guidelines, and sustainability. We describe the challenges NorthShore University HealthSystem Kellogg Cancer Center (NKCC) and their Living in the Future (LIFE) Cancer Survivorship Program faced in meeting this standard and how evolving the SCP delivery process has resulted in a sustainable model. Methods: LIFE implemented a technology-based SCP tool using a centralized consultative model led by a nurse practitioner (NP) with specialized survivorship training. Physicians referred eligible patients to the survivorship clinic for an education visit where they received a SCP from the NP. Since the centralized model was dependent on one person for delivery, a more sustainable model was needed. NKCC transitioned to a decentralized process, moving SCP creation and delivery responsibility to all oncology care providers (OCPs). Although not all OCPs had specialized survivorship training, care quality was supported by automated SCP creation based on evidence-based care recommendations embedded in the technology. Results: To date, 143 evidence-based SCPs have been delivered since tool implementation in April 2017. During the centralized model (April 25– June 30) 67 SCPs were created by the lead LIFE NP; 76 were created during the decentralized process while the lead NP was on leave (July 3 – Oct 1). By using a technology-based SCP, OCPs incorporated SCP delivery into their workflow and no longer had to refer patients to a separate clinic. Conclusions: This project demonstrates the feasibility of a sustainable, decentralized process using a technology-based SCP as an option for augmenting centralized SCP delivery. A comparable number of patients received a SCP during both processes with an equivalent number of SCPs being delivered via the decentralized model by OCPs supported by evidence-based technology.

Purpose: To investigate the activity of carboplatin and cetuximab in NSCLC. Patients and Methods: This was a single arm, multicenter phase II trial, and the primary objective was response rate. Results: The overall response rate observed was 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3–19), the progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.6), the median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.9–10.5), and 1-year survival rate was 33% (95% CI, 21–45). Conclusion: The combination of carboplatin and cetuximab demonstrated lower activity than double agent platinum-based therapy and does not warrant further development.

There are several advantages to including comprehensive health-related quality of life (HRQL) in symptom trials in oncology. The most obvious is to test the hypothesis that HRQL will be improved in addition to the symptom benefit. We should not "require," however, that a successful symptom intervention also improve other dimensions of HRQL. On the other hand, we should expect that it will not make other dimensions worse through side effects or exacerbation of disease, even if it improves the symptom. HRQL assessment in the trial helps evaluate the competing risks of any therapy. Furthermore, assessment of HRQL is now accomplished with very brief assessment (usually 30 questions or less), and the knowledge gained is valuable. With HRQL, one can compare cancer patients with those with other conditions and can determine the contribution of symptoms and side effects to the more broadly defined HRQL. Examples using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy measurement system will demonstrate how HRQL assessment has contributed to our understanding of common cancer symptoms and their place in the conceptualization of HRQL. The prevalence of clinically significant symptoms is greatest in poor performance status (PS) patients compared with patients with good PS. Symptom improvement trials specifically designed for these patients should be encouraged, particularly with interventions that can provide symptomatic relief and improve multidimensional HRQL.

Background Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a treatable but incurable disease. Methods A MEDLINE search was performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed articles that addressed the questions posed for this section. The writing committee developed and graded recommendations, which were subsequently approved by the American College of Chest Physicians. Results Platinum-based doublets remain the standard of care in patients with good performance status (PS); there is no evidence that the addition of a third cytotoxic agent improves survival. Likewise, with only one exception, the addition of a new targeted or biological agent to platinum-based doublets does not improve survival. The one exception is the addition of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic agent, to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with stage IV disease and good PS. Patients for whom bevacizumab is recommended must also be selected on the basis of histology (nonsquamous), absence of brain metastases and hemoptysis, and no indication for therapeutic anticoagulation. In patients with stage IV NSCLC and PS of 2, chemotherapy is recommended, but the optimal approach has not been defined. Elderly patients, defined as ≥ 70 years old, also derive benefit from chemotherapy. Most elderly patients should receive single-agent chemotherapy, but elderly patients with good PS and without significant comorbidities seem to derive a similar benefit from platinum-based doublets compared with their younger counterparts without a prohibitive difference in treatment toxicities. Because stage IV NSCLC is incurable, quality-of-life issues are important, and tools exist to monitor a patient's quality of life during therapy. Last, patients need to be informed of the implication of the diagnosis of stage IV NSCLC and be educated about treatment options that are available to them. Conclusions Advances have been made in stage IV NSCLC, and the appropriate use of chemotherapy continues to evolve on the basis of well-designed clinical trials that address critical issues in this population.

For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to benefit from ALK inhibitors, sensitive and specific detection of ALK genomic rearrangements is needed. ALK break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved and standard-of-care diagnostic assay, but identification of ALK rearrangements by other methods reported in NSCLC cases that tested negative for ALK rearrangements by FISH suggests a significant false-negative rate. We report here a large series of NSCLC cases assayed by hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care.Hybrid-capture-based CGP using next-generation sequencing was performed in the course of clinical care of 1,070 patients with advanced lung cancer. Each tumor sample was evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations, including base-pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations and rearrangements, as well as fusions/rearrangements.A total of 47 patients (4.4%) were found to harbor ALK rearrangements, of whom 41 had an EML4-ALK fusion, and 6 had other fusion partners, including 3 previously unreported rearrangement events: EIF2AK-ALK, PPM1B-ALK, and PRKAR1A-ALK. Of 41 patients harboring ALK rearrangements, 31 had prior FISH testing results available. Of these, 20 were ALK FISH positive, and 11 (35%) were ALK FISH negative. Of the latter 11 patients, 9 received crizotinib based on the CGP results, and 7 achieved a response with median duration of 17 months.Comprehensive genomic profiling detected canonical ALK rearrangements and ALK rearrangements with noncanonical fusion partners in a subset of patients with NSCLC with previously negative ALK FISH results. In this series, such patients had durable responses to ALK inhibitors, comparable to historical response rates for ALK FISH-positive cases.Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) that includes hybrid capture and specific baiting of intron 19 of ALK is a highly sensitive, alternative method for identification of drug-sensitive ALK fusions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously tested negative using standard ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnostic assays. Given the proven benefit of treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK fusions, CGP should be considered in patients with NSCLC, including those who have tested negative for other alterations, including negative results using ALK FISH testing.

Fractals are mathematical constructs that show self-similarity over a range of scales and non-integer (fractal) dimensions. Owing to these properties, fractal geometry can be used to efficiently estimate the geometrical complexity, and the irregularity of shapes and patterns observed in lung tumour growth (over space or time), whereas the use of traditional Euclidean geometry in such calculations is more challenging. The application of fractal analysis in biomedical imaging and time series has shown considerable promise for measuring processes as varied as heart and respiratory rates, neuronal cell characterization, and vascular development. Despite the advantages of fractal mathematics and numerous studies demonstrating its applicability to lung cancer research, many researchers and clinicians remain unaware of its potential. Therefore, this Review aims to introduce the fundamental basis of fractals and to illustrate how analysis of fractal dimension (FD) and associated measurements, such as lacunarity (texture) can be performed. We describe the fractal nature of the lung and explain why this organ is particularly suited to fractal analysis. Studies that have used fractal analyses to quantify changes in nuclear and chromatin FD in primary and metastatic tumour cells, and clinical imaging studies that correlated changes in the FD of tumours on CT and/or PET images with tumour growth and treatment responses are reviewed. Moreover, the potential use of these techniques in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of lung cancer are discussed.

The LIFE Cancer Survivorship Program at NorthShore University HealthSystem provides risk-adapted visits (RAV) facilitated by an oncology nurse during which a survivorship care plan (SCP) is provided and discussed. In this report, we describe and evaluate RAV in promoting individualized health care and self-management during survivorship transition. Patients complete a post-RAV questionnaire at their RAV and another ≥1 year after their RAV. One thousand seven hundred thirteen (1713) RAVs, majority for breast cancer, occurred from January 2007 to March 2014. One thousand six hundred fifteen (1615) “day-of” post-RAV questionnaires were completed. Respondents scaled statements as strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree. Combined strongly agree/agree ratings are 94 % felt more confident in communicating information about their treatments to other health care providers, 90 % felt more comfortable recognizing signs/symptoms to report to providers, and 98 % had a better appreciation for community programs/services. Of 488 respondents (RAV January 2007 to December 2012 n = 1366) to a questionnaire at least 1 year after the RAV, nearly 100 % found SCP useful to summarize medical information, 97 % to reinforce follow-up, 85 % to recognize symptoms of recurrence, 93 % to identify healthy lifestyle practices, 91 % to assist in identifying resources for support, 72 % discussed their SCP with their healthcare provider, and 97 % made at least one positive lifestyle change. Participation in LIFE RAV following treatment helps survivors to guide future self-care behavior. Data suggest that benefits may persist 1 year after the visit and support the feasibility of a nurse-led RAV to establish a SCP in cancer survivors. Combined provision and discussion of SCPs help survivors construct a useful understanding of their cancer experience and may promote long-term self-management.

Background The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exisulind, a selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug, in combination with gemcitabine as second-line therapy in patients with progressing advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients whose disease progressed more than 3 months from completion of first-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase I/II trial. Primary end points were maximally tolerated dose and time to progression. Patients in the phase I portion of the study were treated with gemcitabine (1250 mg/m 2 ) in combination with three escalated dose levels of exisulind. Treatment involved six cycles of gemcitabine and exisulind followed by exisulind maintenance. The study was subsequently expanded to phase II. Results Thirty-nine patients (15 in phase I and 24 in phase II) were treated. The regimen was well tolerated with grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 constipation being dose-limiting toxicities. The maximally tolerated dose was not reached. Dose level 3 of exisulind (250 mg twice daily) in combination with gemcitabine was used for phase II. The overall response rates were 7% (phase I), 17% (phase II), and 13% (all). Median time to progression and median and 1-year survival, respectively, were 3.7 and 9.7 months and 33% (phase I); 4.3 and 9.4 months and 41% (phase II); and 4.1 and 9.4 months and 39% (all). Conclusion Although the study met its primary end point of improving time to progression (more than 4.1 months in phase II), we did not observe a clear survival advantage and thus do not plan to further investigate this schedule of gemcitabine and exisulind.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced in the standard therapy of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but they benefit a minority of patients. The study of molecular markers may identify the subset of patients who are the most appropriate to treat with these agents. Methods: We analyzed 43 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with gefitinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were included in analysis. We evaluated EGFR in tumor tissue by using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. We also studied downstream molecules (AKT, ERK, p38 MAPK) and their activation status and the presence of EGFR mutations in tumor tissue in exons 18-21. Results: Three patients had tumors with EGFR mutations, all of which had EGFR gene amplification with a ratio of 2 or greater ( p = 0.001). There was no correlation between EGFR protein expression and gene amplification. Six patients (14%) achieved an objective response and nine (21%) had stable disease; the median survival was 162 days. EGFR mutations, high levels of AKT protein expression, rash of any grade, and no history of smoking were predictive of disease control (objective response plus stable disease). Only 3 of 15 patients (20%) with disease control had an EGFR mutation. On multivariate analysis, rash and AKT were independent predictors of disease control. Patients with rash survived longer than patients without rash. Conclusions: EGFR mutation-positive tumors are present in a small fraction of patients who achieve disease control with gefitinib. Other molecular markers, such as AKT, need to be further evaluated. Clinical parameters remain major determinants of gefitinib activity in NSCLC.

This article updates the performance characteristics of the most commonly used diagnostic and staging modalities in the evaluation of a patient who has lung cancer. Recent data with newer modalities, like positron emission tomography, are reviewed, and their role in this evaluation is discussed.

Summary Background: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel both have significant single agent activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because both are cell cycle and phase specific in their mechanism of action, frequent exposure should optimize activity. Phase I data support that gemcitabine is maximally converted to the active metabolite when it is infused at a rate of 10mg/(m 2 min). Based on this, we designed a phase II trial to examine gemcitabine 800mg/m 2 infused over 80min with paclitaxel 110mg/m 2 infused over 3h both on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days as first line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The primary objectives were to assess the response rate, toxicity and survival of the combination in advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetic (PK) distribution of gemcitabine, the ability to achieve a concentration of 10–20μM when gemcitabine was infused at a rate of 10mg/(m 2 min), as well as to assess the quality of life (QOL) with the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) questionnaire. Methods: Patients with NSCLC, no prior treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1, adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function were eligible for this trial. Paclitaxel 110mg/m 2 was infused over 3h, followed by gemcitabine 800mg/m 2 infused over 80min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for the first 2 patients, and then amended to days 1 and 8 every 21 days after the first 2 patients required day 15 dose omissions due to myelosupression. Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated. Nine PS=0; 28 PS=1; Stage IIIB=3, Stage IV=36; median age 62 (range: 39–77). A median of six cycles (range: 0–10) was delivered. Grade 3–4 toxicities observed in ≥10% of patients included leucopenia in 26%, neutropenia in 28%, dyspnea in 13%, febrile neutropenia in 3% (1 patient). Fourteen of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21–53%) patients had a partial response (PR), 14 of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21–53%) had stable disease (SD) and 5 patients (13%, 95% CI: 4–27%) had progressive (PD). Median survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.3–13.6). One-and two-year survival rates were 35% (95% CI: 21–53%) and 5% (95% CI: 0.6–17%), respectively. QOL as measured by the FACT-L and the trial outcome index (TOI) did not change significantly from baseline over the course of therapy. Conclusions: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is an active and well-tolerated combination in advanced NSCLC. Patients on this trial had no significant change in their QOL as assessed by the FACT-L questionnaire.

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma has not been defined to date. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of a Phase III trial that treated patients who had Stage IIIB or IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with carboplatin and paclitaxel and analyzed the impact of age on response rate, survival, toxicity, and quality of life. METHODS Patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to receive either 4 cycles of carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 and paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg/m2 every 21 days or treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel (C/P) until they developed disease progression. At the time of disease progression, all patients on both arms were to receive second-line weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m2 per week. In this analysis, patients age 70 years and older were compared with patients younger than age 70 years. In addition, a minimum log rank P value analysis was performed in an attempt to identify other potential age splits that may have been significant. RESULTS Two hundred thirty patients were randomized. Sixty-seven patients were age 70 years or older (29%). The median number of cycles delivered for both age groups was 4 cycles (range, 0–19 cycles). No statistically significant differences in any of the most common toxicities (Grade ≥ 2) associated with C/P were identified (data from Cycles 1–4) for patients younger than age 70 years compared with patients age 70 years and older, respectively, including neutropenia (38% vs. 35%), neuropathy (13% vs. 16%), leukopenia (7% vs. 13%), myalgia/arthralgia (15% vs. 9%), malaise (8% vs. 15%), anemia (9% vs. 4%), thrombocytopenia (7% vs. 9%), anorexia (8% vs. 4%), and nausea/emesis (14% vs. 15%). In addition, no potential age splits that may have been significant were found using a minimum log rank P value analysis. CONCLUSIONS The current analysis demonstrated that C/P exhibited similar toxicity profiles in patients age 70 years and older compared with patients younger than age 70 years. The survival rates were not different between the two age groups, and there was no difference in progression of quality-of-life outcomes. In fit, elderly patients, C/P represented a reasonable standard regimen. Cancer 2003;98:779–88. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

114 Background: Due to escalating cost of cancer care, patients (PTs) with cancer are at increased risk for financial toxicity (FTOX) that can exacerbate disparities in care and lead to clinically relevant adverse PT outcomes; including quality of life; symptom burden; adherence; and survival. A review of our informed consent (IC) process demonstrated that PTs were not routinely informed of financial risks of high-cost (HC) cancer therapies at the time of IC. Methods: A multidisciplinary team was formed to conduct a rapid-cycle quality improvement project with the aim of reducing FTOX through improvement in patient education at the time of IC. Because of HC and increased utilization, the initial pilot focused on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). A cause and effect diagram identified the potential causes that FTOX was not addressed during the IC process. Diagnostic data were obtained through staff surveys and querying our EMR from June to August, 2016. A Pareto chart identified lack of educational (ED) tools at the time of IC and a poorly understood prior authorization (PA) process as the most common causes for not addressing risk of FTOX during IC. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) #1 began with development of a PT ED tool to be used during IC. The tool was approved by the Patient Advisory Board. Staff from clinical teams utilizing ICI for approved indication completed training on its use and a pilot study was initiated. PDSA#2 focused on optimizing the PA process and PDSA#3 focused on PT distress and FTOX monitoring through the NCCN distress and a validated patient-reported-outcome tools (COST), respectively. Results: The utilization of the PT ED tool reached the project aim (administer to > 65% of pts during IC) during initial phase of PDSA#1, although accrual is ongoing. A revised PA process (PDSA#2) was developed, staff were educated and the updated PA process was initiated. Work on PDSA#3 is ongoing. Conclusions: This QI project suggests that it is feasible to address FTOX through PT ED during IC for HC cancer therapies. However, the impact of this intervention on PT distress, overall FTOX and treatment disparities will need to be monitored closely.

97 Background: Node positive disease (N+) is frequent (~40%) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and esophagectomy, yet limited data exist regarding the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in this setting. There are no randomized studies addressing this question and single-institution, retrospective studies have reported mixed findings. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database. 2,258 N+ patients were identified who had received NAT (83.3% chemoradiation and 17.7% chemotherapy alone) followed by esophagectomy. Patients with either incomplete staging or treatment data were excluded, as were those who died within 90 days following esophagectomy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for differences in patient characteristics between those who did (AC+) or did not (AC-) receive AC. Overall survival (OS) after surgery, by AC status, was analyzed using Cox regression in a sample propensity matched on relevant demographic and clinical factors. Results: 433/2258 patients received AC (19.2%). Patients who received AC tended to be younger (OR 0.98 per 1-year increase, P = .03) and had a higher socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.47 for high vs. low SES, P = .01). Although there were no significant differences in comorbidity (P = .32), AC+ patients had significantly shorter hospital stays after surgery (OR 0.98 per 1-day increase, P = .03). Pathologic T classification was unrelated to the likelihood of receiving AC (P = .39), however patients with a higher pathologic N stage were more likely receive AC (OR 2.12 for pN3 vs. pN1, P < .001). Those receiving AC had demonstrably longer OS from the time of surgery than those who did not (HR 0.78, P = .004). Median OS for the entire cohort was 22.6 months, whereas the administration of AC was associated with an improvement in median OS of 6.2 months (26.3 vs. 20.1 months). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that AC is associated with a significant improvement in OS (median 6.2 months) in N+ patients following NAT and esophagectomy. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal role of AC in this setting.

Despite being curable at early stages, lung malignancies remain the leading cause of cancer deaths among North Americans, underscoring the need for more effective early diagnostic strategies. Lung cancer should be eminently screenable since the at-risk population is well defined (~90% of lung cancer occurs in current or former smokers) [1]. While previous trials with chest x-ray and sputum cytology has been disappointing, there has been renewed interest in screening using low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT). The landmark results came from a randomized trial of 55,000 smokers (National Lung Cancer Screening Trial) that demonstrated that LDCT screening resulted in a 20% reduction of lung cancer deaths. However, the false positives rate with LDCT was substantial (cumulative rate of 33% after two LDCTs). Importantly, 7% of these false positive LDCTs mandated an invasive procedure (generally bronchoscopy) [2]. The poor positive predictive value results from the low prevalence of lung cancer in the asymptomatic smokers (~1%) and represents one of the most vexing barriers to LDCT screening [3]. Indeed, even with excellent test performance (e.g., 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity), more than nine in ten positives are actually false positives in conventional lung cancer screening groups. Thus, the concerns over cost and harms from false positives (e.g., patient anxiety, cost and complications from unnecessary invasive procedures) represent major impediments to the implementation of LDCT for population screening.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the US with >150,000 deaths per year. In order to more effectively reduce lung cancer mortality, more sophisticated screening paradigms are needed. Previously, our group demonstrated the use of low-coherence enhanced backscattering (LEBS) spectroscopy to detect and quantify the micro/nano-architectural correlates of colorectal and pancreatic field carcinogenesis. In the lung, the buccal (cheek) mucosa has been suggested as an excellent surrogate site in the "field of injury". We, therefore, wanted to assess whether LEBS could similarly sense the presence of lung. To this end, we applied a fiber-optic LEBS probe to a dataset of 27 smokers without diagnosed lung cancer (controls) and 46 with lung cancer (cases), which was divided into a training and a blinded validation set (32 and 41 subjects, respectively). LEBS readings of the buccal mucosa were taken from the oral cavity applying gentle contact. The diagnostic LEBS marker was notably altered in patients harboring lung cancer compared to smoking controls. The prediction rule developed on training set data provided excellent diagnostics with 94% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 95% accuracy. Applying the same threshold to the blinded validation set yielded 79% sensitivity and 83% specificity. These results were not confounded by patient demographics or impacted by cancer type or location. Moreover, the prediction rule was robust across all stages of cancer including stage I. We envision the use of LEBS as the first part of a two-step paradigm shift in lung cancer screening in which patients with high LEBS risk markers are funnelled into more invasive screening for confirmation.

Background Combined-modality therapy has become standard for many patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Although surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival, the limited number of resectable patients and the presence of occult micrometastatic disease has limited the effectiveness of this modality alone. Methods The authors reviewed several trials involving the use of induction chemotherapy in managing resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Results Extensive phase II experience in patients with stage III disease has confirmed the feasibility of this approach. Unfortunately, heterogeneous patient populations and treatment regimens limit the ability to draw firm conclusions from these trials alone. While the phase III experience has been limited, long-term follow-up is now available suggesting that induction therapy may have a beneficial impact on survival, especially for those patients who can be sufficiently downstaged. Recent phase II trials have included stage III patients who have traditionally been considered inoperable. Although encouraging, the role of surgery after chemoradiotherapy for this population of patients remains undefined. Conclusions Results from ongoing randomized trials studying the impact of induction therapy on well-defined patient populations will be necessary before the optimal regimen and patient population can be identified.

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous, complex, and challenging disease to treat. With the arrival of genotyping and genomic profiling, our simple binary division of lung cancer into non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is no longer acceptable. In the past decade and with the advent of personalized medicine, multiple advances have been made in understanding the underlying biology and molecular mechanisms of lung cancer. Lung cancer is no longer considered a single disease entity and is now being subdivided into molecular subtypes with dedicated targeted and chemotherapeutic strategies. The concept of using information from a patient’s tumor to make therapeutic and treatment decisions has revolutionized the landscape for cancer care and research in general.