Search

A recent review in this Journal, which criticizes NCCN’s recommendations based, in part, on the RTOG 9501 and the EORTC 22931 trials, warrants comment. We herein provide additional data addressing many of the points and misinterpretations raised in that review which convincingly supports the use of concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with good performance status and high-risk pathologic features after surgery for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Purpose To report the long-term results of the Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11 study evaluating the contribution of chemotherapy added to radiation therapy (RT) for larynx preservation. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III or IV glottic or supraglottic squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to induction cisplatin/fluorouracil (PF) followed by RT (control arm), concomitant cisplatin/RT, or RT alone. The composite end point of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was the primary end point. Results Five hundred twenty patients were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 10.8 years. Both chemotherapy regimens significantly improved LFS compared with RT alone (induction chemotherapy v RT alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95; P = .02; concomitant chemotherapy v RT alone: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .03). Overall survival did not differ significantly, although there was a possibility of worse outcome with concomitant relative to induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .08). Concomitant cisplatin/RT significantly improved the larynx preservation rate over induction PF followed by RT (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = .0050) and over RT alone (P < .001), whereas induction PF followed by RT was not better than treatment with RT alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.82; P = .35). No difference in late effects was detected, but deaths not attributed to larynx cancer or treatment were higher with concomitant chemotherapy (30.8% v 20.8% with induction chemotherapy and 16.9% with RT alone). Conclusion These 10-year results show that induction PF followed by RT and concomitant cisplatin/RT show similar efficacy for the composite end point of LFS. Locoregional control and larynx preservation were significantly improved with concomitant cisplatin/RT compared with the induction arm or RT alone. New strategies that improve organ preservation and function with less morbidity are needed.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligatory precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). With increased use of screening mammography to detect occult breast cancer, the incidence of DCIS has markedly increased. It is estimated that 1 million women will be living with this condition by 2020 (1,2). Left untreated, up to 53% of DCIS will progress to invasive breast cancer over a period of 10 or more years (3). Unfortunately, DCIS classifications used in clinical practice do not adequately predict the risk of DCIS recurrence and progression (4). Recently, a new pathologic grading system was proposed to improve the prediction of local recurrence (5). In this system, DCIS cases with high nuclear grade, predominantly solid architecture, and extensive (present in >50% of ducts) comedo-type necrosis had a particularly bad prognosis and were associated with recurrence or progression to IBC in less than 10 years. Sanders et al. examined the natural history of untreated, low-grade, noncomedo DCIS and showed that 39.3% of these patients developed invasive breast cancer in the same quadrant as the initial biopsy, with most events occurring within 10 to 15 years, but with some as late as 23 to 42 years after initial biopsy (6). Nearly half of the patients who developed invasive breast cancer died of metastatic disease 1 to 7 years after diagnosis. The results of this study suggest that a subset of patients with histologically low-grade DCIS will develop life-threatening invasive carcinoma. Stratifying DCIS patients using prognostic tumor markers might prevent both under and over treatment. Active investigation of the biological processes responsible for progression of DCIS to invasive disease may facilitate development of better prognostic tests. The 2009 State of Science National Institutes of Health Conference on Diagnosis and Management of DCIS recommended development of risk stratification tests based on a comprehensive understanding of the clinical, radiological, pathological, and biological factors (2). Numerous biomarkers have been investigated for risk stratification of patients with DCIS. For example, elevated Ki67 levels, p53 mutations, and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification are known to be associated with increased nuclear grade and necrosis, histologic features that are associated with DCIS recurrence and progression (7–9). Cell cycle markers have also been studied, including p21, p27, and cyclin D1 (10–12). Despite these studies, no single biomarker has emerged to guide clinical practice. Recently, retinoblastoma (RB) pathway disruption has been implicated in the invasive progression of DCIS. Gautier et al. reported that overexpression of p16ink4a and concomitant elevation of the proliferation marker Ki67 were observed in DCIS at risk for progressing to IBC (8). We confirmed this association in our DCIS cohort and demonstrated increased recurrence and invasive progression in tumors with elevated p16ink4a/Ki67 (13). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is another tumor suppressor that is commonly lost in breast cancer (14–16). No cancers rely on only a single tumor suppressor abnormality for invasive tumor development. However, in a number of tumor types, including breast cancer, there is a subtype of RB and PTEN doubly deficient tumors. Genetic modeling in glioblastoma and other cancers has suggested cooperation between these pathways in disease progression (17). Although PTEN expression has been associated with breast cancer metastasis and poor survival in invasive breast cancer, its role in DCIS progression has not been investigated. The goal of this study was to define the role of RB and PTEN as prognostic biomarkers for DCIS recurrence and progression.

Purpose Previous analysis of this Intergroup trial demonstrated that with a median follow-up among surviving patients of 45.9 months, the concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiation therapy improved local-regional control and disease-free survival of patients who had high-risk resectable head-and-neck carcinomas. With a minimum of 10 years of follow-up potentially now available for all patients, these results are updated here to examine long-term outcomes. Methods and Materials A total of 410 analyzable patients who had high-risk resected head-and-neck cancers were prospectively randomized to receive either radiation therapy (RT: 60 Gy in 6 weeks) or identical RT plus cisplatin, 100 mg/m 2 i.v. on days 1, 22, and 43 (RT + CT). Results At 10 years, the local-regional failure rates were 28.8% vs 22.3% ( P =.10), disease-free survival was 19.1% vs 20.1% ( P =.25), and overall survival was 27.0% vs 29.1% ( P =.31) for patients treated by RT vs RT + CT, respectively. In the unplanned subset analysis limited to patients who had microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease, local-regional failure occurred in 33.1% vs 21.0% ( P =.02), disease-free survival was 12.3% vs 18.4% ( P =.05), and overall survival was 19.6% vs 27.1% ( P =.07), respectively. Conclusion At a median follow-up of 9.4 years for surviving patients, no significant differences in outcome were observed in the analysis of all randomized eligible patients. However, analysis of the subgroup of patients who had either microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease showed improved local-regional control and disease-free survival with concurrent administration of chemotherapy. The remaining subgroup of patients who were enrolled only because they had tumor in 2 or more lymph nodes did not benefit from the addition of CT to RT.

Purpose: To analyze the prospectively collected health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) data from patients enrolled in two Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized Phase III head and neck cancer trials (90-03 and 91-11) to assess their value as an independent prognostic factor for locoregional control (LRC) and/or overall survival (OS).Methods and Materials: HRQOL questionnaires, using a validated instrument, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), version 2, were completed by patients before the start of treatment. OS and LRC were the outcome measures analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.Results: Baseline FACT-H&N data were available for 1,093 patients and missing for 417 patients. No significant difference in outcome was found between the patients with and without baseline FACT-H&N data (p = 0.58). The median follow-up time was 27.2 months for all patients and 49 months for surviving patients. Multivariate analyses were performed for both OS and LRC. Beyond tumor and nodal stage, Karnofsky performance status, primary site, cigarette use, use of concurrent chemotherapy, and altered fractionation schedules, the FACT-H&N score was independently predictive of LRC (but not OS), with p = 0.0038. The functional well-being component of the FACT-H&N predicted most significantly for LRC (p = 0.0004).Conclusions: This study represents, to our knowledge, the largest analysis of HRQOL as a prognostic factor in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. The results of this study have demonstrated the importance of baseline HRQOL as a significant and independent predictor of LRC in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.

Purpose To determine whether the addition of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) could improve the outcomes of anemic patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Methods and Materials Eligible patients had SCCHN, with a plan for continuous-course definitive radiotherapy (66–72 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. Patients with Stage III or IV SCCHN were required to undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation radiotherapy. Preradiotherapy hemoglobin was required to be between 9.0 g/dL and 13.5 g/dL (12.5 g/dL for women). Patients randomized to Epo received 40,000 U once weekly, starting 7–10 days before start of radiotherapy. Results A total of 148 patients were enrolled; 141 were evaluable. Median pretreatment hemoglobin was 12.1 g/dL. Hemoglobin levels at 4 weeks rose by an average of 1.66 g/dL in the Epo arm, compared with an average 0.24 g/dL decrease in the control arm (p = 0.0001). Median follow-up was 2.5 years (3.1 years for surviving patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of local–regional failure (LRF) rate between the treatment arms. The 3-year LRF rate was 36% for control and 44% for Epo (p = 0.56). There were also no significant differences in local–regional progression-free survival (LRPFS), patterns of failure, overall survival, or toxicity. The 3-year LRPFS rate was 52% for control and 47% for Epo. The overall survival rate was 57% and 56%, respectively. Conclusions The addition of Epo to definitive radiotherapy for SCCHN did not improve outcomes. The study was not specifically designed to detect a potential negative association between Epo and tumor progression/survival.

Objectives: To assess whether microvessel density (MVD), an immunohistochemical marker for tumor vascularity, predicts for radiotherapy (RT) outcome in locally advanced HNSCC patients. Methods: A total of 459 patients, enrolled on the RTOG 90-03 trial, had biopsy specimens submitted, and a value for MVD determined, prior to definitive RT. 450 patients were analyzable for this study. Tumor microvessels were stained for factor VIII-related antigen using a standard immunoperoxidase method. The mean number of stained microvessel profiles, from three x200 fields containing the highest MVD (hot spot), was recorded as the MVD. A prospective value of ≥60 was chosen as the threshold for high MVD, tumor vascularity. Results: The median follow-up for the analyzable patients with MVD assessment was 22.0 months and 79.1 months for all living patients. There were no differences concerning the pretreatment characteristics between those RTOG 90-03 patients with a value for MVD and those without a value for MVD. Thus, the present study cohort possessed comparable characteristics with the entire RTOG 90-03 population. MVD values ranged from 5 to 80, with a median value of 30. Only 37 of 450 (8.2%) patients possessed an MVD ≥60. There were no outcome differences for patients with MVD

We aimed to examine deficiencies in established methods of summarising adverse events, and to create a new reporting system (TAME) for summarising the toxicity burden of cancer treatment. TAME consolidates traditional adverse-event data into three risk domains: short-term (acute) Toxicity (T), Adverse long-term (late) effects (A), and Mortality risk (M) generated by a treatment programme (E=End results); and assigns treatments to risk classes for each risk domain.We examined formally an established method for summarising adverse events (the max-grade method) in five trials of patients with head and neck cancer done between September, 1991, and August, 2000, by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) that involved 13 treatment groups (2304 patients). We calculated TAME summary metrics that included time and multiplicity factors in the same patient groups. We compared relative T values with relative values for toxic effects from the max-grade approach. We also calculated the range of individual patient T scores in two groups from one of the trials (the laryngeal-preservation trial).The max-grade method systematically excluded 29-70% of total reported high-grade (grade 3-4) acute adverse events, contained progressive bias, and favoured higher toxicity programmes. Relative T values in the 13 treatment programmes tested showed an increase of almost 500% in acute toxicity burden (100-590) between treatment groups compared with a 170% increase (100-270) between treatment groups by use of the max-grade method. The difference between these two summary systems was statistically significant (mean difference -102 [95% CI -167 to -37], p=0.005, t test for paired differences). Four risk classes were designated for acute and relative late effects: low (100-140), moderate (150-390), high (400-490), and extreme (or=500). The distribution of individual patient T scores showed that 82 (60%) patients who received concurrent platinum-radiotherapy for larynx preservation reported two or more high-grade events, and 34 (20%) reported four or more high-grade events; these findings differed significantly from the distribution of individual patient T scores for patients who received radiotherapy alone, in which 32 (19%) reported two or more high-grade events and 3 (3%) reported four or more high-grade events (p0.0001). The max-grade method also systematically excluded 26-48% of high-grade (grade 3-4) late adverse events. However, less variation was noted in the relative risk of late events (100-270) by the TAME method for late effects.Traditional methods for summarising adverse events systematically exclude important data, giving an inaccurate impression of the toxicity burden in complex multimodality trials. By contrast, T values use data on all high-grade adverse events. T values are proportional to the intensity of treatment, showing a 500% increase between treatment groups in acute toxicity burden in RTOG trials of head and neck cancer done during this study interval. TAME reporting provides a concise and uniform method to compare relative risk among treatment options. Future studies should include testing the performance of the TAME system in additional datasets (from different research organisations and disease sites), prospective correlation of TAME endpoints with predefined outcome measures, and assessment of its usefulness in clinical decision making.

Purpose This study evaluated whether males without partners were disadvantaged for survival in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) head and neck cancer clinical trials. Methods Patients treated on three RTOG trials were studied. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if sex and the interaction between sex and marital/partner status were independent prognostic variables for overall survival controlling for Karnofsky performance status, tumor stage, nodal stage, primary site, and protocol treatment. Results A total of 1,901 patients (1,509 men) were entered onto the three RTOG trials, with 1,822 (1,438 men) analyzable patients. Prognostic variables independent of disease-related variables for survival in multivariate analyses restricted to men were age, marital/partner status, and income. Conclusion The apparent disadvantage of unpartnered men is striking, even after controlling for disease and other demographic variables. Possible explanations could easily be tested in observational studies, leading to evaluation of simple interventions to improve their outcome.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have studied the role of unconventional fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but the effect of such treatment on survival is not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether this type of radiotherapy could improve survival. METHODS: Randomised trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy, or both, in patients with non-metastatic HNSCC were identified and updated individual patient data were obtained. Overall survival was the main endpoint. Trials were grouped in three pre-specified categories: hyperfractionated, accelerated, and accelerated with total dose reduction. FINDINGS: 15 trials with 6515 patients were included. The median follow-up was 6 years. Tumours sites were mostly oropharynx and larynx; 5221 (74%) patients had stage III-IV disease (International Union Against Cancer, 1987). There was a significant survival benefit with altered fractionated radiotherapy, corresponding to an absolute benefit of 3.4% at 5 years (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p=0.003). The benefit was significantly higher with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (8% at 5 years) than with accelerated radiotherapy (2% with accelerated fractionation without total dose reduction and 1.7% with total dose reduction at 5 years, p=0.02). There was a benefit on locoregional control in favour of altered fractionation versus conventional radiotherapy (6.4% at 5 years; p

Despite the use of resection and postoperative radiotherapy, high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently recurs in the original tumor bed. We tested the hypothesis that concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiotherapy would improve the rate of local and regional control.Between September 9, 1995, and April 28, 2000, 459 patients were enrolled. After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions over a period of 6 to 6.6 weeks) and 228 patients to receive the identical treatment plus concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43).After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the rate of local and regional control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for local or regional recurrence, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.91; P=0.01). The estimated two-year rate of local and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in the radiotherapy group. Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease or death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04), but overall survival was not (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.09; P=0.19). The incidence of acute adverse effects of grade 3 or greater was 34 percent in the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P0.001). Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatment.Among high-risk patients with resected head and neck cancer, concurrent postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve the rates of local and regional control and disease-free survival. However, the combined treatment is associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects.

Purpose Oral mucositis (OM) causes significant morbidity during the course of radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head-and-neck cancer. It is hypothesized that infection plays a role in the development of OM. We tested the efficacy of iseganan HCl (iseganan), a synthetic peptide with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, for preventing RT-associated OM. Methods A multinational, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was performed on patients receiving primary RT, primary chemoradiotherapy or postoperative RT. Patients were randomized to receive iseganan oral solution plus standard-of-care oral hygiene (SOC), placebo plus SOC, or SOC alone throughout the RT administration period. The severity of OM was assessed by NCI-CTC scoring and clinical symptoms by patient questionnaire. Results A total of 545 patients were randomized to the study. Nine percent of the patients in both the iseganan and placebo groups did not develop ulcerative OM (Grades 2, 3, 4) ( p = 0.998) whereas only 2% of the patients receiving SOC alone remained free of oral ulceration ( p = 0.049). The maximum severity of mouth pain and difficulty swallowing did not differ in patients treated with iseganan or placebo. However, patients in both intervention groups reported less mouth pain and difficulty swallowing than did patients receiving SOC alone. Nausea was the only adverse event that occurred with ≥5% increased frequency in the iseganan group than in either the placebo or SOC groups (51% vs. 42% vs. 46%). Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation and death did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Iseganan oral solution was safe but did not reduce the risk for developing ulcerative OM relative to placebo. Intensified oral hygiene or the administration of the vehicle used to deliver study drug in this trial appears to have reduced the risk and severity of OM. Our results suggest that antimicrobial intervention may not meaningfully affect the pathogenesis of radiation-induced OM.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy is the standard alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The value of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy and the optimal timing of chemotherapy are unknown.We randomly assigned patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx to one of three treatments: induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin, or radiotherapy alone. The primary end point was preservation of the larynx.A total of 547 patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years. At two years, the proportion of patients who had an intact larynx after radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (88 percent) differed significantly from the proportions in the groups given induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (75 percent, P=0.005) or radiotherapy alone (70 percent, P0.001). The rate of locoregional control was also significantly better with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin (78 percent, vs. 61 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 56 percent with radiotherapy alone). Both of the chemotherapy-based regimens suppressed distant metastases and resulted in better disease-free survival than radiotherapy alone. However, overall survival rates were similar in all three groups. The rate of high-grade toxic effects was greater with the chemotherapy-based regimens (81 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 82 percent with radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin, vs. 61 percent with radiotherapy alone). The mucosal toxicity of concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin was nearly twice as frequent as the mucosal toxicity of the other two treatments during radiotherapy.In patients with laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for laryngeal preservation and locoregional control.

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Protocol 92–02 was a randomized trial testing long-term (LT) adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) after initial AD with external-beam radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PC; T2c-4) and with prostate-specific antigen level less than 150 ng/mL. Patients and Methods: Patients received a total of 4 months of goserelin and flutamide, 2 months before and 2 months during RT. A radiation dose of 65 to 70 Gy was given to the prostate and a dose of 44 to 50 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were randomly assigned to receive no additional therapy (short-term [ST]AD-RT) or 24 months of goserelin (LTAD-RT); 1,554 patients were entered onto the study. Results: The LTAD-RT arm showed significant improvement in all efficacy end points except overall survival (OS; 80.0% v 78.5% at 5 years, P = .73), compared with the STAD-RT arm. In a subset of patients not part of the original study design, with tumors assigned Gleason scores of 8 to 10 by the contributing institutions, the LTAD-RT arm had significantly better OS (81.0% v 70.7%, P = .044). There was a small but significant increase in the frequency of late radiation grades 3, 4, and 5 gastrointestinal toxicity ascribed to the LTAD-RT arm (2.6% v 1.2% at 5 years, P = .037), the cause of which is not clear. Conclusion: The RTOG 92–02 trial supports the addition of LT adjuvant AD to STAD with RT for T2c-4 PC. In the exploratory subset analysis of patients with Gleason scores 8 to 10, LT adjuvant AD resulted in a survival advantage.

Tissue micro-arrays have been used for molecular and immunohistochemical studies. We sought to evaluate whether such arrays could substitute for whole sections in correlative studies performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Four multitumor 150-sample arrays were built using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, archival prostate, brain, and head/neck tumor blocks from RTOG tissue bank. p53 immunostaining of arrays and whole sections was done. Blind evaluation of each slide was made, and agreement rates between the two techniques were determined in various scenarios. Cost was also evaluated. Results demonstrate excellent agreement for p53 between slides and arrays. Agreement improved when three or four replicate arrays were used. Findings based on one to four arrays agree well with those obtained from analysis of the whole tissue samples. Minimal tissue damage, improved tissue salvage, cost reduction, ease of interpretation, and significant time savings were realized by using the arrays. Tissue micro array technique is a valuable tool for evaluation of patient materials associated with clinical trials.

Purpose: The optimal fractionation schedule for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has been controversial. The objective of this randomized trial was to test the efficacy of hyperfractionation and two types of accelerated fractionation individually against standard fractionation. Methods and Materials: Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy delivered with: 1) standard fractionation at 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks; 2) hyperfractionation at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week to 81.6 Gy/68 fractions/7 weeks; 3) accelerated fractionation with split at 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week, to 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks including a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or 4) accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field as a second daily treatment for the last 12 treatment days to 72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks. Of the 1113 patients entered, 1073 patients were analyzable for outcome. The median follow-up was 23 months for all analyzable patients and 41.2 months for patients alive. Results: Patients treated with hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost had significantly better local-regional control (p = 0.045 and p = 0.050 respectively) than those treated with standard fractionation. There was also a trend toward improved disease-free survival (p = 0.067 and p = 0.054 respectively) although the difference in overall survival was not significant. Patients treated with accelerated fractionation with split had similar outcome to those treated with standard fractionation. All three altered fractionation groups had significantly greater acute side effects compared to standard fractionation. However, there was no significant increase of late effects. Conclusions: Hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost are more efficacious than standard fractionation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are also increased.

Context.—Inferences from tumor marker studies are complicated by a variety of statistical concerns, which can make proper interpretation of results difficult. This article focuses on important issues that should be addressed when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies. Objective.—To highlight the importance of considering statistical significance, risk ratios, statistical power, reproducibility, multiple testing, confirmatory studies, and missing data in the design of marker studies used for prognosis. Results.—Suggestions are provided for more effectively conducting marker studies. These include more careful attention to adequacy of the number of subjects for a marker study and improved documentation and standardization of assay methods. The importance of complete reporting of study results and description of the statistical analysis methods used is also emphasized. Conclusion.—Cooperation among clinicians, laboratory scientists, and statisticians will be required to conduct statistically sound tumor marker studies and to facilitate prioritizing markers for new and confirmatory studies in an environment of limited patient and specimen resources.

Background.—Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, pathologists, and statisticians considered prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer and stratified them into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence and taking into account the expert opinions of the Prostate Working Group members. Materials and Methods.—Factors were ranked according to the previous College of American Pathologists categorical rankings: category I, factors proven to be of prognostic importance and useful in clinical patient management; category II, factors that have been extensively studied biologically and clinically but whose importance remains to be validated in statistically robust studies; and category III, all other factors not sufficiently studied to demonstrate their prognostic value. Factors in categories I and II were considered with respect to variations in methods of analysis, interpretation of findings, reporting of data, and statistical evaluation. For each factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. Recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) increasing uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) enhancing the quality of data collected pertaining to existing prognostic factors, and (3) improving patient care. Results and Conclusions.—Factors ranked in category I included preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, TNM stage grouping, histologic grade as Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Category II factors included tumor volume, histologic type, and DNA ploidy. Factors in category III included perineural invasion, neuroendocrine differentiation, microvessel density, nuclear roundness, chromatin texture, other karyometric factors, proliferation markers, prostate-specific antigen derivatives, and other factors (oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis genes, etc).

The College of American Pathologists convened a prognostic factor conference in June 1999 to consider prognostic and predictive factors in breast, colon, and prostate cancer, and to stratify these factors into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence. Because so little progress in prognostic factor clinical utility has been made in the last 5 years, the conference participants focused their attention on decreasing variation in methods, interpretation, and reporting of these factors so that greater clarity of value could be achieved. The conference was organized to promote discussion, broad input, and future planning. An initial plenary session provided an overview of the status of tumor marker research, the impact of variation in medicine and pathology, and statistical issues related to prognostic factor research. In working group sessions for each cancer type, participants interactively evaluated and refined the documents created by the expert panels. A second plenary session dealt with issues common to all 3 groups, including the problem of micrometastases in lymph nodes in these sites; statistical issues that arose during the breakout discussions; and issues of variation in methods, interpretation, and reporting of immunohistochemical assays. A faculty session brainstormed strategies that could be used to implement the changes recommended. This session included invited representatives of the Food and Drug Administration, Health Care Financing Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, American Joint Committee on Cancer, and International Union Against Cancer. Cancer site and general recommendations were presented and discussed during a final session to achieve consensus of the conference participants and to address feasibility of implementation of these recommendations. A final discussion focused on future initiatives that might lead to implementation of the changes proposed in the conference by the various organizations represented. This report summarizes the general conference recommendations, cancer working group recommendations, and plans for implementation of the recommendations.

1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, 1904TC/1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 2 The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Medical Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland 3 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 4 University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 5 National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland 6 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 7 Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France 8 American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

BACKGROUND Despite encouraging results with chemoradiation as the primary means of managing carcinoma of the anal canal, approximately 20% of patients will develop a local recurrence. This study examined the prognostic significance of p53 nuclear protein overexpression in the pretreatment biopsies of patients treated with chemoradiation for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. METHODS All patients were treated in a prospective, randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (RTOG 87-04) in which radiotherapy to the pelvis was compared with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-FU and mitomycin-C. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded blocks or unstained slides from the pretreatment biopsies of 64 patients were obtained from referring institutions and evaluated immunohistochemically with the polyclonal p53 antibody CM-1. A multivariate analysis was conducted to analyze overexpression of p53 in terms of locoregional control, no evidence of disease (NED), and overall survival. RESULTS p53 protein was overexpressed in 48.4% of the cases. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients whose tumors overexpressed p53 to have inferior locoregional control (52% vs. 72%, P = 0.13), NED survival (52% vs. 68%, P = 0.27), and absolute survival (58% vs. 78%, P = 0.14). Of all the pretreatment factors analyzed, only International Union Against Cancer stage was predictive of outcome in multivariate analysis. Among those patients whose tumors overexpressed p53, there was a trend toward improved outcome in the arm that received 5-FU and mitomycin-C compared with the arm that received 5-FU only. CONCLUSIONS Overexpression of the p53 protein may be associated with inferior outcome for patients managed with definitive chemoradiation for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 1999;85:1226–33. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

Background Local-regional recurrence of disease remains the major obstacle to cure of advanced head and neck cancers. Methods This investigation reviewed data derived from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols #85-03 and #88-24 to identify characteristics of tumors that predicted local-regional recurrence of disease following surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Results The presence of tumor in two or more lymph nodes, and/or extracapsular spread of nodal disease, and/or microscopic-size tumor involvement of the surgical margins of resection imparts a high risk of local-regional (L-R) relapse. Our data also support the hypothesis that, following surgery, the concurrent addition of chemotherapy (CT) to RT may increase the likelihood of L-R control of disease for patients who have these high-risk characteristics. Conclusion A prospective trial of surgery followed by concurrent RT and CT is warranted for patients who have high-risk characteristics found at surgery. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 20: 588–594, 1998.

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic monitoring and drug dose adjustment of Etanidazole (Eta) in patients treated on the RTOG randomized trial for Stage III and IV head and neck cancer. Methods and Materials: From June, 1986 to October, 1991, 521 patients were randomized to conventional RT alone or RT plus Eta. The primary goal was to determine whether the addition of Eta to conventional radiation therapy improves local-regional control and tumor-free survival. Of the 264 patients who received Eta, 233 had their drug exposure calculated and the Eta dose and schedule adjusted accordingly to prevent the occurrence of serious peripheral neuropathy. Drug exposure was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for a single treatment that was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of Eta. The total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by multiplying the AUC by the number of drug administrations. Results: Eighteen percent of patients developed Grade I and 6% developed Grade II peripheral neuropathy. There was no Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy. There is a trend for an increased risk of neuropathy by single dose AUC. The minimal difference in incidence of neuropathy by single-dose AUC was due to the use of dose and schedule modification for patients with the higher values. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics investigated in this study confirm previous work that monitoring Eta levels, with dose adjustment, allows it to be used safely in the clinic. In a subset analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in local-regional control and survival rates for patients with N0 and N1 disease, that will require confirmation (14). However, the clinical efficacy of Eta in this trial proved to be of little overall benefit.

Survival outcome of 1592 analyzable patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were studied utilizing a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). This approach creates a regression tree according to prognostic variables which partitions into homogenous subsets according to survival. Four protocols, RTOG 83-11, 83-21, 84-03 and 84-07 were analyzed. 83-11 and 84-07 were studies utilizing irradiation with alterfractionation; 83-21 and 84-03 were studies evaluating thymocin with irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation with thoracic irradiation respectively. Nine pretreatment variables and one treatment variable were analyzed. Adjustment for radiotherapy effect was made in the accelerated treatment protocol (84-07). Overall, median survival for the entire group was 9.0 months with 17% alive at 2 years. Univariate analysis suggests that KPS,or = 70 vs. 80-100, pleural effusion, weight loss,or = 5% vs. 5%, age, 60+ vs.60, T stage (T1 and T2 vs. T3 and T4) and N stage (N- vs. N+) were important prognastic factors. Radiation dose, sex, race and histology were not univariate prognastic factors. RPA identified KPS as the most significant covariate (median survival 5.9 mos.or = 70 vs. 9.9 mos. 80-100). Within KPS 80-100 other splits occurred for N stage, age, weight loss and radiation therapy dose. KPSor = 70 split at pleural effusion only. The best overall RPA tree has four distinct classes with median survival times ranging from 3.3 to 12.6 months. The RPA classes were validated in an independent non-small cell lung cancer dataset. This analysis may allow more intelligent stratification and study-design for future RTOG trials in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

The Patterns of Care Study in Radiation Oncology has documented United States national averages for the evaluation and treatment of prostate cancer from 1973 to 1994. We report the characteristics of patient populations, treatment characteristics, and outcomes of care.

The purpose of this article is to describe the methodology used by the Patterns of Care Study to conduct surveys of the practice of radiation oncology that not only provide national averages for process and outcome measures but also allow comparisons among important subgroups. The article describes how the sample design assures that these analyses are possible and presents methods used for data collection and analysis.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene (also known as TP53) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. Several studies have shown that p53 mutations are infrequent in prostate cancer and are associated with advanced disease.We assessed the prognostic value of identifying abnormal p53 protein expression in the tumors of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated with either external-beam radiation therapy alone or total androgen blockade before and during the radiation therapy.The study population consisted of a subset of patients entered in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8610 ("a phase III trial of Zoladex and flutamide used as cytoreductive agents in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy"). Immunohistochemical detection of abnormal p53 protein in pretreatment specimens (i.e., needle biopsies or transurethral resections) was achieved by use of the monoclonal anti-p53 antibody DO7; specimens in which 20% or more of the tumor cell nuclei showed positive immunoreactivity were considered to have abnormal p53 protein expression. Associations between p53 protein expression status and the time to local progression, the incidence of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated in univariate (logrank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards model) analyses. Reported P values are two-sided.One hundred twenty-nine (27%) of the 471 patients entered in the trial had sufficient tumor material for analysis. Abnormal p53 protein expression was detected in the tumors of 23 (18%) of these 129 patients. Statistically significant associations were found between the presence of abnormal p53 protein expression and increased incidence of distant metastases (P = .04), decreased progression-free survival (P = .03), and decreased overall survival (P = .02); no association was found between abnormal p53 protein expression and the time to local progression (P = .58). These results were independent of the Gleason score and clinical stage. A significant treatment interaction was detected with respect to the development of distant metastases: Among patients receiving both radiation therapy and hormone therapy, those with tumors exhibiting abnormal p53 protein expression experienced a reduced time to the development of distant metastases (P = .001); for patients treated with radiation therapy alone, the time to distant metastases was unrelated to p53 protein expression status (P = .91).Determination of p53 protein expression status yield significant, independent prognostic information concerning the development of distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who are treated primarily with radiation therapy.The interaction of radiation therapy plus hormone therapy and abnormal p53 protein expression may provide a clinical link to experimental evidence that radiation therapy and/or hormone therapy act, at least in part, by the induction of apoptosis (a cell death program) and suggests that this mechanism may be blocked in patients whose tumors have p53 mutations.

The diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an increasingly common event due to widespread use of screening mammography. However, appropriate clinical management of DCIS is a major challenge in the absence of prognostic markers. Tumor-initiating cells may be particularly relevant for disease pathogenesis; therefore, two markers associated with such cells, EZH2 and ALDH1, were evaluated. A cohort of 248 DCIS patients was used to determine the association of EZH2 and ALDH1 with ipsilateral breast event, DCIS recurrence and progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC). In this cohort, high EZH2 expression was associated with the risk of an ipsilateral breast event and DCIS recurrence but not invasive progression. ALDH1 expression was observed in both the tumor and stromal compartment; however, in neither compartment were ALDH1 levels independently associated with evaluated study endpoints. Interestingly, the combination of high EZH2 with high epithelial ALDH1 was associated with disease progression. Therefore, ALDH1 within the DCIS lesion can add to the prognostic significance of EZH2, particularly in the context of risk of development of invasive disease.

PURPOSE Definitive chemoradiation (CR) has replaced radical surgery as the preferred treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. To determine the importance of mitomycin (MMC) in the standard CR regimen and to assess the role of salvage CR in patients who have residual tumor following CR, a phase III randomized trial was undertaken by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between August 1988 and December 1991, 310 patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy (RT) and fluorouracil (5-FU) or radiotherapy, 5-FU, and MMC. Of 291 assessable patients, 145 received 45 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic RT plus 5-FU at 1,000 mg/m2/d for 4 days, and 146 received RT, 5-FU, and MMC (10 mg/m2 per dose for two doses). Patients with residual tumor on posttreatment biopsy were treated with a salvage regimen that consisted of additional pelvic RT (9 Gy), 5-FU, and cisplatin (100 mg/m2). RESULTS Posttreatment biopsies were positive in 15% of patients in the 5-FU arm versus 7.7% in the MMC arm (P = .135). At 4 years, colostomy rates were lower (9% v 22%; P = .002), colostomy-free survival higher (71% v 59%; P = .014), and disease-free survival higher (73% v 51%; P = .0003) in the MMC arm. A significant difference in overall survival has not been observed at 4 years. Toxicity was greater in the MMC arm (23% v 7% grade 4 and 5 toxicity; P < or = .001). Of 24 assessable patients who underwent salvage CR, 12 (50%) were rendered disease-free. CONCLUSION Despite greater toxicity, the use of MMC in a definitive CR regimen for anal cancer is justified, particularly in patients with large primary tumors. Salvage CR should be attempted in patients with residual disease following definitive CR before resorting to radical surgery.

During the past 25 years, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a major role in head and neck cancer clinical research. The major research themes for recent and currently active trials have been: (a) combined modality therapy, (b) altered fractionation radiotherapy, (c) hypoxic cell sensitizers, (d) organ preservation, (e) chemoprevention, and (f) clinical/laboratory correlations. For advanced operable disease, the RTOG showed improved local-regional control with postoperative radiotherapy as compared to preoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx and hypopharynx. This established the use of surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy as the standard treatment in subsequent RTOG and Intergroup trials for operable disease. For advanced inoperable disease, the RTOG demonstrated the feasibility of testing altered fractionation radiotherapy in a multiinstitutional clinical trials setting. A Phase III trial comparing hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation to conventional fractionation is now in progress. Phase I/II combined modality studies established the efficacy of concurrent high-dose cisplatin and radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced disease and provided the basis for further testing in Phase III trials for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, larynx preservation, and high-risk advanced operable disease. Analysis of the extensive RTOG Head and Neck Cancer database established the incidence of second malignancies and their adverse impact on patients whose initial tumors were cured by radiotherapy, and provided the basis for chemoprevention trials. Recursive partitioning analysis identified 6 distinct prognostically homogeneous patient groups based on pretreatment tumor or patient characteristics and/or treatment variables. Retrospective analysis identified tumor p105 antigen density as an independent prognostic indicator in patients irradiated for head and neck cancer. Future trials will continue to focus on the reduction of morbidity and mortality, and improvement of the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients through innovative radiotherapy delivery, multimodality approaches, use of chemical and biological modifiers, and other novel therapies, identification of clinical and biological prognostic indicators, and prevention or diminution of acute morbidity and late complications of the disease and its treatment.

Purpose : To obtain reliable data on the extent of the brachytherapy practice in the United States by conducting a comprehensive survey of all facilities. Methods and Materials : The Clinical Research Committee of the AES surveyed all 1321 radiation oncology facilities identified in the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR). Multiple mailings and follow-up were made to obtain a high response rate. Survey responders and nonresponders were compared using chi-square tests. Summary statistics were reported. Results : Of the 1321 facilities, 1054 responded (80%). Hospital-based and larger facilities had a statistically significant higher rate of response. Brachytherapy was being performed at 819 facilities (the median number of procedures = 21–50). Two hundred and two facilities did no brachytherapy. The common isotopes used were 137Cs (705 facilities), 192Ir (585 facilities), 125I (236 facilities), and 131I (194 facilities). The common brachytherapy techniques used were intacavitary (751 facilities), interstitial (536 facilities), intraluminal (310 facilities), and placques (148 facilities). Remote afterloaded brachytherapy was used at 205 centers as follows: high dose rate (HDR) (164), medium dose rate (MDR) (5), and low dose rate (LDR) (36). Computerized dosimetry was most commonly used (790 facilities), followed by Patterson-Parker (104 facilities) and Quimby (72 facilities). The common sites treated were cervix (701 facilities), endometrium (565 facilities), head and neck (354 facilities), and lung (344 facilities). Conclusions : data regarding brachytherapy practice has been obtained from a large percentage (80%) of all facilities in the United States. The majority (78–81%) of radiation oncology facilities perform brachytherapy; however, its use is restricted to gynecological implants in many of these centers. The results from this survey will be used to develop a pattern of care study and data registry in brachytherapy.

Background. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX), which may permit higher total doses of radiation therapy without increased toxic effects to normal tissues, has been used with pelvic tumors, but its combination with brachytherapy has not been well studied. Methods. A prospective Phase I/II trial was designed to study HFX with brachytherapy in patients with bulky Stage IB and IIA, IIB, III, and IVA carcinomas of the cervix. HFX doses of 1.2 Gy were administered to the whole pelvis twice daily at 4-6 hour intervals, 5 days per week; the total dose to the whole pelvis was 24-48 Gy. External pelvic irradiation was followed by one or two intracavitary applications to deliver the total minimum dose of 85 Gy at point A and 65 Gy to the lateral pelvic nodes

In recent years, the issue of gender bias in clinical decision making has attracted increasing attention. Evidence supporting possible discrimination on the basis of gender in the diagnosis or treatment of patients with cancer has been offered. We investigated possible gender bias in clinical decision making by analyzing the Patterns of Care Study data on palliative radiotherapy. Information on 784 patients treated in 1984–1985 for metastatic cancer causing bone pain, obstruction of a hollow viscus, or neurologic dysfunction was reviewed. There were 395 men and 389 women in the study population from 49 institutions around the country. The median dose of radiation delivered was 3,000 cGy. This was generally done in 6–10 treatments over 8–14 days. No significant difference was found between men and women in the total dose of radiation delivered or elapsed days of treatment. These data suggest that palliative radiation therapy is delivered without regard to the gender of the patient.

Patient compliance with the increasingly complex adjuvant therapy protocols has always been of concern, particularly in the head and neck cancer population. The Head and Neck Intergroup recently concluded a phase III prospective randomized trial testing the addition of three courses of cisplatinum containing combination chemotherapy to standard treatment defined as surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for advanced stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma. The chemotherapy was administered following the surgery prior to the postoperative radiotherapy. Variation from protocol is ranked retrospectively as minor acceptable, major acceptable, and major unacceptable. The incidence of major unacceptable variation from the protocol for radiotherapy immediately following the surgery was 15% vs. 19% in the population that completed all three courses of the chemotherapy (P < 0.10). However, for those patients that completed less than the three courses of chemotherapy, the incidence of major unacceptable variation in radiotherapy was 33% (P < 0.001). This observation was controlled for site, stage, performance status, age, sex, surgical margins and experience of participating institution. We conclude that compliance with a multicourse adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is predictive of subsequent compliance to radiotherapy in the head and neck cancer population.

This study examined the effects of bolus volume and viscosity and the variability of repeated swallows in ten stroke patients and ten age-matched nonstroke subjects. The ten stroke patients demonstrated single unilateral cortical (three subjects), subcortical (six subjects), or brainstem (one subject) infarcts on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans at three weeks post-ictus. All subjects underwent videofluoroscopic swallow studies in which seven temporal pharyngeal swallow measures were examined. Despite the dissimilarity in lesion locations, the swallow physiology in the stroke patients was relatively homogeneous, ie, no swallowing disorders severe enough to prevent oral intake. As bolus volume increased, pharyngeal delay time diminished in stroke patients, but not in nonstroke subjects. Increasing bolus volume affected three other pharyngeal swallow measures similarly in nonstroke and stroke subjects: laryngeal closure durations and cricopharyngeal (CP) opening durations increased and duration of tongue base contact to posterior pharyngeal wall decreased. On viscosity comparisons (liquid vs paste), both subject groups displayed longer duration of base of tongue contact to posterior pharyngeal wall. On paste swallows, nonstroke subjects had longer CP opening and lower swallow efficiency, whereas stroke patients did not. This study found no statistically significant learning/repetition effect for repeated swallows in either subject group, or both groups combined.

A major activity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has been the investigational treatment of bronchogenic carcinoma. The goal of the RTOG has been to improve survival with an emphasis on local control primarily in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. RTOG 73-01 [l] demonstrated a dose response relationship of irradiation to local control with a dose escalation of external beam irradiation from 40 to 60 Gy, and an incremental improvement in short term survival was also observed with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (Table 1). Unfortunately, this effect did not result in improved long term survival and ultimately, 70% of these patients failed locally. In an attempt to improve these poor results but encourage by the short term dose response for local control and survival, the RTOG has initiated studies investigating the use of biologics, altered fractionation, hypoxic cell sensitizers and cytotoxic chemotherapy delivered with irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer. The major clinical effort of the entire group during the past 10 years has been an emphasis on altered fractionation. Table 2 depicts many of these trials and summarizes the number of patients entered on study [2]. RTOG 83-11 was the largest Phase II trial in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer evaluating the use of altered fractionation and forms the basis for many of the group’s current trials. During the past 5 years the group

A major activity of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) during the past 20 years has been clinical trial development in bronchogenic carcinoma. In RTOG 73-01, the group was able to demonstrate a dose response to external beam irradiation in unresectable lung cancer. In spite of an improved response rate and a short-term benefit in survival, no long-term benefit in survival has been demonstrated (Table 1). Patients continue to exhibit a high incidence of local failure (-70%) with longer follow-up. In order to improve these results, the RTOG has conducted a series of randomized trials evaluating biologic response modifiers, hypoxic cell sensitizers, altered fractionation and chemo-sensitization. Trials involving hypoxic sensitizers and biologics have not yielded positive results for these agents. Phase III trials involving altered fractionation and chemotherapy are ongoing. The purpose of this report is to summarize the group’s activities with altered fractionation in lung cancer. Table 2 lists group studies designed to test altered fractionation in all disease sites. We can define “standard fractionation” as 1.8 to 2.0 Gy delivered as a single fraction daily, 5 days per week, to 60 to 70 Gy. Variations on this schedule constitute altered fraction. Discussion will be limited to the schedules defined as follows: Hyper~kzctionution: The size of the dose per fraction is reduced, the number of total fractions is increased, the total dose is slightly increased and the overall time is relatively unchanged. Treatment is usually given two or more times daily. Hypofractionation: The size of the dose per fraction is increased, the number of dose fractions is decreased, the total dose is decreased and the relative time is unchanged. Treatment is usually given one to three times a week. Accelerated fractionation: The overall time of treatment is significantly reduced, the

Background Several trials have studied the role of altered fractionation radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but the effect of such treatment on survival is not clear. Objectives The aim of this individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was to assess whether this type of radiotherapy could improve survival. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; CENTRAL (2010, Issue 3); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ISRCTN and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 8 August 2010. Selection criteria We identified randomised trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy, or both, in patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and grouped trials into three pre-specified treatment categories: hyperfractionated, accelerated and accelerated with total dose reduction. Trials were eligible if they began recruitment after 1969 and ended before 1998. Data collection and analysis We obtained updated individual patient data. Overall survival was the main outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures were local or regional control rates (or both), distant control rates and cause-specific mortality. Main results We included 15 trials with 6515 patients. The median follow up was six years. Tumour sites were mostly oropharynx and larynx; 5221 (74%) patients had stage III-IV disease (UICC 2002). There was a significant survival benefit with altered fractionation radiotherapy, corresponding to an absolute benefit of 3.4% at five years (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.97; P = 0.003). The benefit was significantly higher with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (8% at five years) than with accelerated radiotherapy (2% with accelerated fractionation without total dose reduction and 1.7% with total dose reduction at five years, P = 0.02). There was a benefit in locoregional control in favour of altered fractionation versus conventional radiotherapy (6.4% at five years; P < 0.0001), which was particularly efficient in reducing local failure, whereas the benefit on nodal control was less pronounced. The benefit was significantly higher in the youngest patients (under 50 year old) (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94), 0.95 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.09) for 51 to 60 year olds, 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.06) for 61 to 70 year olds, and 1.08 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.30) for those over 70 years old; test for trends P = 0.007). Authors' conclusions Altered fractionation radiotherapy improves survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of the different types of altered radiotherapy suggests that hyperfractionation provides the greatest benefit. An update of this IPD meta-analysis (MARCH 2), which will increase the power of this analysis and allow for other comparisons, is currently in progress.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) attempts to overcome tumor proliferation during treatment by permitting higher total doses in the same overall time as standard fractionation. Whereas interruptions, including splits, reduce local control with standard fractionation in carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts, HFX might compensate for interruptions. Patients were randomized to receive total doses of 6720, 7200, 7680, and 8160 cGy, using 120 cGy twice daily, 5 days per week. Those analyzed received +/- 4% of assigned total dose and lived 90 days or more. Treatment was completed within 5 days of the time specified for each treatment arm in 233 patients; 48, 80, and 131 patients had delays 14, 10, and 5 days or more, respectively. Locoregional control and survival were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.03) reduced with delays of 5 days or more when corrected for prognostic factors. Late effects of radiation therapy were not affected by interruptions. These data support the hypothesis that proliferation (possibly accelerated) of tumor clonogens during treatment influences the outcome.

Purpose To validate lysyl oxidase (LOX), a hypoxia-related protein, as a marker for metastasis in an independent head and neck cancer (HNC) patient group enrolled onto a prospective trial. Patients and Methods We performed traditional immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) for LOX expression in 66 HNC patients from one institution. We also performed AQUA staining for LOX in 306 of 1,113 patients treated on a phase III trial comparing four radiation fractionation schedules in locally advanced HNC (RTOG 90-03). Pretreatment characteristics and outcome were similar between patients with and without LOX assessment. We correlated AQUA LOX expression with time to metastasis (TTM), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results LOX expression from both staining methods predicted for TTM in the first 66 patients. Multivariate analysis, controlling for significant parameters including nodal stage and performance status, revealed tumor LOX expression, as a continuous variable, was an independent predictor for TTM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.33; P = .0001), TTP (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10; P = .0069), and OS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.07; P = .0311) in RTOG 90-03 patients. This translates into a 259% increase in metastatic risk for a patient at the 75th percentile of LOX compared with one at the 25th percentile. Conclusion AQUA LOX expression was strongly associated with increased metastasis, progression, and death in RTOG 90-03 patients. This study validates that LOX is a marker for metastasis and survival in HNC.

Despite initial efficacy of imatinib mesylate in most gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients, many experience primary/secondary drug resistance. Therefore, clinical management of GIST may benefit from further molecular characterization of tumors before and after imatinib mesylate treatment. As part of a recent phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment for advanced primary and recurrent operable GISTs (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group S0132), gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays was done on tumor samples obtained before and after imatinib mesylate therapy. Patients were classified according to changes in tumor size after treatment based on computed tomography scan measurements. Gene profiling data were evaluated with Statistical Analysis of Microarrays to identify differentially expressed genes (in pretreatment GIST samples). Based on Statistical Analysis of Microarrays [False Discovery Rate (FDR), 10%], 38 genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in the pretreatment biopsy samples from tumors that significantly responded to 8 to 12 weeks of imatinib mesylate, that is, >25% tumor reduction. Eighteen of these genes encoded Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) domain containing zinc finger (ZNF) transcriptional repressors. Importantly, 10 KRAB-ZNF genes mapped to a single locus on chromosome 19p, and a subset predicted likely response to imatinib mesylate–based therapy in a naïve panel of GIST. Furthermore, we found that modifying expression of genes within this predictive signature can enhance the sensitivity of GIST cells to imatinib mesylate. Using clinical pretreatment biopsy samples from a prospective neoadjuvant phase II trial, we have identified a gene signature that includes KRAB-ZNF 91 subfamily members that may be both predictive of and functionally associated with likely response to short-term imatinib mesylate treatment. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(8):2172–82]

I t is estimated that in 1991, 16,700 new cases of primary central nervous system tumors will be diagnosed in the United States, and that 11,500 patients will succumb to their disease.’ Malignant gliomas comprise 33% to 45% of primary brain tumors,2’3 and of these, nearly 85% are glioblastoma multiforme.2’4 The 1980 patterns of care survey for brain tumor patients conducted by the Joint Section on Central Nervous System Tumors of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer found that the 5-year survival rate for patients with anaplastic astrocytomas was 18%, while it was only 5% for those with glioblastoma multiforme.* With few exceptions, there has been little improvement in the outcome of patients with malignant gliomas over the past decade. Prospective clinical studies have shown both the efficacy and the shortcomings of conventional radiation therapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas.5,6 The response of these lesions to standard radiotherapeutic techniques is limited by their striking inherent radioresistance’ and the radiosensitivity of the surrounding normal brain tissue.’ In addition to pursuing more effective chemotherapy programs, research strategies have focused on methods designed to enhance the effectiveness of external irradiation using hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, halogenated pyrimidine analogs, and altered fractionation schemes, or to selectively augment the tumor dose using interstitial brachytherapy. Single-institution and cooperative group studies using these approaches are now in progress. This review examines

A prospective, randomized, multi-institutional, Phase I(LE)/II trial of HFX was conducted by the RTOG between 1983 and 1987. Patients with histologically proven, inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts stratified by site, nodal status, and performance status, were assigned to one of three arms, were assigned to one of three arms, 67.2 Gy, 72.0 Gy, or 76.8 Gy. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were given twice daily, 5 days per week: intervals of 4 to 8 hours were permitted between fractions. After acceptable rates of acute normal tissue effects were found, the randomization was changed to evaluate a new higher total dose, 81.6 Gy. Of 479 patients entered, 447 were analyzed, 63 on 67.2 Gy, 129 on 72.0 Gy, 117 on 76.8 Gy, and 138 on 81.6 Gy. The treatment arms were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. Acute reactions consisted almost entirely of pseudomembranous inflammation. "Severe" (Grade 3) acute reactions were reported in 33% to 41% and grade 4 reactions were found in 0 to 3% of patients, with no differences in frequencies among the four arms. Toxicities that developed or persisted beyond 90 days after the first treatment (408 patients evaluable greater than 90 days) did not differ among arms: grade 3+ reactions occurred in 10% to 14%, and grade 4+ effects (necroses) were reported in 5% at 67.2 Gy, 3% at 72.0 Gy, 7% at 76.8 Gy, and 2% at 81.6 Gy. Grade 3+ acute reactions occurred in 40% of patients when the interfraction interval was less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 31% with greater than 4.5 hours (p = .03). Interfraction intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours were associated with higher frequencies of grade 4+ late effects in all four arms, 8% of 197 patients with less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 1% of 211 patients with greater than 4.5 hours. Estimates of late toxicity at 1, 2, and 3 years were 5.5%, 9.8%, and 15.4% with intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours, versus 1.7% at all three periods for greater than 4.5 hours (p = .006). Local-regional control at 2 years was 25% for the assigned dose of 67.2 Gy compared to 43% to 45% for the three higher doses (p = .01), but a similar comparison for survival showed no significant difference (p = .35). There was no evidence for an effect of interfraction interval on either local-regional control (p = .38) or survival (p = .28).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A previously reported Phase I/II multimodality program for non-resectable hepatocellular cancer began with external beam-radiation and chemotherapy, followed by administration of 131I antiferritin-specific radioimmunoglobulin and led to a 48% remission (7% complete remission and 41% partial remission). Survival and response depended on alpha fetoprotein status. AFP+ patients had a median survival of 5 months; AFP- patients had a median survival of 10.5 months. No acute effects occurred relative to treatment with radiolabeled antibody. A randomized prospective study was designed to compare full dose chemotherapy consisting of 60 mg/m2, doxorubicin and 500 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil administered every 3 weeks, to 131I antiferritin administration every 8 weeks and allowed for crossover treatment if tumor progression occurred. Overall, radiolabeled antibody administration and full dose chemotherapy led to equivalent partial remission rates (22-30% vs 23-25%) and survival rates compared to chemotherapy (6 month median; AFP+ 5 months; AFP- 10 months). The most important new observations were the response in AFP- patients who, following chemotherapy failure, achieved remission using 131I radiolabeled antibody (7/11) and a subset of patients (7%) who were treated with radiolabeled antibody and converted from non-resectable to resectable status followed by surgical excision.

• As part of the developmental process for the Head and Neck Intergroup trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced resectable head and neck carcinoma, in 1981 the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, Pa, conducted two nonrandomized pilot studies using chemotherapy consisting of three courses of cisplatin and fluorouracil infusion. Chemotherapy was administered prior to surgery in 42 patients (induction) and after surgery in an additional 29 patients (sequential). The populations were roughly comparable with respect to tumor site and stage. Twelve of the 42 patients in the induction group and seven of the 29 in the sequential group are alive and with no evidence of disease at the last reported follow-up. The median survival was 31 months in the sequential group vs 20 months in the induction group. Only two of the 26 patients with less than a complete clinical response following induction chemotherapy are still alive. Twenty-seven of the 42 patients who received induction chemotherapy did not undergo surgery as initially planned. Despite the lack of surgery, at 5 years the survival between the two groups was not significantly different (27% for the induction group vs 23% for the sequential group). ( Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1991;117:288-291)

One of the current national prospective clinical trials of the Head and Neck Intergroup explores the usage of chemotherapy in advanced operable head and neck cancer patients. The experimental arm consists of the addition of 3 courses of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy to standard treatment defined as surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. In the design of the study it is necessary to define not only the extent of the surgery performed for each eligible lesion, but also to insure uniformity of surgery performed between surgeons and institutions. This will hopefully insure that any variation between the 2 arms of the study represent the effect of the chemotherapy. The procedure to obtain and confirm uniformity of surgery is multifaceted. It is, however, fundamentally based upon the current TNM staging system and therefore has intrinsic limitations.

For all randomized trials since 1978, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group has required the study chairman for radiation therapy to review the treatment given to each patient. The chairman scores the compliance of the treatment borders, total dose, fraction, and total elapsed time relative to the protocol prescription at the primary site, regional nodes, and any critical structure. The individual parameters are then considered together to derive an “overall” treatment score. For two RTOG head and neck studies in patients with moderately and very advanced carcinomas, the “overall” treatment was classified as unacceptable if the treatment at primary was scored unacceptable with respect to dose, fractionation, and field borders. However, prolonged elapsed treatment was not included. Analysis of these studies with 426 evaluable patients was performed to assess the relationship of unacceptable “overall” treatment compliance with outcome. Patients with prolonged treatment elapsed days (14 days beyond the protocol prescription) exhibited significantly poorer loco-regional control (13% vs. 27% at 3 years with p = .007) and absolute survival (13% vs. 26% at 3 years with p = .01). As a result, the criteria for unacceptable “overall” treatment were revised to include prolonged elapsed treatment days. Further multivariate analyses showed the revised criteria identified patients with significantly poorer loco-regional control and absolute survival even after adjusting for other prognostic factors.