1. Transcription factors WT1 and p53 combined: a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer
- Author
-
Thomas G. Lewis, Jackson O. Pemberton, Mariah K. Dooley, Lydia Duvall, Michelle C. Robillard, James A. Deddens, Molly Frydl, Julia H. Carter, Gretchen Mueller, and Larry E. Douglass
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,congenital, hereditary, and neonatal diseases and abnormalities ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system diseases ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antigen ,Ovarian cancer ,Internal medicine ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,Neoplasm Invasiveness ,Clinical significance ,Stage (cooking) ,WT1 Proteins ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Cell Nucleus ,Ovarian Neoplasms ,urogenital system ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Age Factors ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Immunohistochemistry ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,Up-Regulation ,Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Female ,Neoplasm Grading ,Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 ,business - Abstract
Background New approaches to ovarian cancer are needed to improve survival. Wilms’ tumour 1 (WT1) is a tumour-associated antigen expressed in many ovarian cancers. P53 is also often altered. The clinical significance of the combined expression of these two transcription factors has not been studied. Methods One hundred ninety-six ovarian tumours were classified histopathologically. Tumours were stained for WT1 and p53 immunohistochemically. Stains were analysed according to tumour type, grade and FIGO stage. Kaplan–Meier analyses on 96 invasive carcinomas determined whether categorical variables were related to survival. Results WT1 and p53 were related to ovarian tumour type, grade, FIGO stage and patient survival. Uniform nuclear p53 expression was associated with invasion and WT1 expression was associated with advanced grade, FIGO stage and poor survival. When WT1 and p53 were both in the age-adjusted Cox model, WT1 was significant while p53 was not. When we combined tumours expressing WT1 and p53, then adjusted for age and tumour subtype, the hazard ratio compared to tumours without WT1 and with normal p53 was 2.70; when adjusted for age and FIGO stage, the hazard ratio was 2.40. Conclusions WT1, an antigen target, is a biomarker for poor prognosis, particularly when combined with altered p53.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF