Search

Objective: This study evaluated the ergonomics and time requirements of using a novel automated suturing and titanium fastener deployment technology for chordal replacement in human heart specimens in open and minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) simulators. Methods: Five cardiac surgeons used novel, manually powered expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) suturing devices to automate suture placement between mitral leaflets and papillary muscles in explanted cadaver hearts, along with customized titanium fastener delivery devices to secure suture and trim suture tails. This mitral chordal replacement test was conducted using surgical models simulating open and MICS mitral repair access. The study was approved by the institutional ethical board. Results: After a brief introduction to this technique using plastic models, study surgeons performed 48 chordal replacements in human mitral valves, placing 18 in an open model and 30 in a right minithoracotomy model. The time range to complete a single chordal replacement was between 55 s and 8 min, with an overall mean duration of 3.6 ± 1.5 min. No difference in duration of implantation was recorded for the MICS and open sternotomy simulators used. Good control of suture delivery was reported in 95.8% ( n = 46) of leaflet aspect of the sutures and in 100% ( N = 48) of papillary muscle sutures. Conclusions: Automated mitral chordal ePTFE suturing simulated through open and MICS access demonstrated quality handling and accurate placement of sutures in human heart specimens. A clinical trial using this technology is currently ongoing. This innovation may present an important advance facilitating enhanced minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

With limited data available for the tricuspid valve, there are no stringent recommendations in the current guidelines (ESC 2021). Valve replacement for the right-sided heart is inherently problematic and bears the potential for complications - including prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT). The purpose of this editorial is to review the key features of this clinical scenario and to outline the essential aspects for optimized patient management and improved outcome. Depending on the clinical presentation of PVT, either immediate surgery, thrombolysis, or anticoagulation may be considered - with the sole intensification of anticoagulation likely being the most inferior. Given the high risk of re-thrombosis, a dedicated follow-up program is essential to identify complications early and offer adequate treatment.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a valuable alternative technique to surgery and the spectrum of therapy continues to evolve. The JenaValve Pericaridal transcatheter aortic valve replacement System allows prosthesis fixation in a native, noncalcified aortic annulus with a unique paper clip-like anchorage mechanism. The low rate of paravalvular leakage and permanent pacemaker implantation emphasizes the further widespread use of the JenaValve - despite the limited data available. In May 2021, a CE mark for the transfemoral implantation in both aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis was granted. However, no data have been published so far. The ongoing ALIGN trials are expected to provide the pending long-term data.Lay abstract There is a wide variety of valve systems to treat aortic valve disease. This review summarizes the previously published data of the JenaValve system. Thanks to unique characteristics, this valve can be used either for aortic stenosis or regurgitation. Early data are promising with a low complication rate. Further studies are required to assess long-term results.

Aims Concomitant cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is difficult to recognize, since both conditions are associated with concentric left ventricular thickening. We aimed to assess type, frequency, screening parameters, and prognostic implications of CA in AS. Methods and results A total of 191 consecutive AS patients (81.2 ± 7.4 years; 50.3% female) scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 81.7% underwent complete assessment including echocardiography with strain analysis, electrocardiography (ECG), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), 99mTc‐DPD scintigraphy, serum and urine free light chain measurement, and myocardial biopsy in immunoglobulin light chain (AL)‐CA. Voltage/mass ratio (VMR; Sokolow–Lyon index on ECG/left ventricular mass index) and stroke volume index (SVi) were tested as screening parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curve, binary logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier curve analyses were performed. CA was found in 8.4% of patients (n = 16); 15 had transthyretin (TTR)‐CA and one AL‐CA. While global longitudinal strain by echo did not reliably differentiate AS from CA‐AS [area under the curve (AUC) 0.643], VMR as well as SVi showed good discriminative power (AUC 0.770 and 0.773, respectively), which was comparable to extracellular volume by CMR (AUC 0.756). Also, VMR and SVi were independently associated with CA by multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.016 and P = 0.027, respectively). CA did not significantly affect survival 15.3 ± 7.9 months after TAVR (P = 0.972). Conclusion Both TTR‐ and AL‐CA can accompany severe AS. Parameters solely based on ECG and echocardiography allow for the identification of the majority of CA‐AS. In the present cohort, CA did not significantly worsen prognosis 15.3 months after TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly become a viable alternative to the conventional isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (iSAVR) for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, data on younger patients is scarce and a gap exists between data-based recommendations and the clinical use of TAVR. In our study, we utilized a machine learning (ML) driven approach to model the complex decision-making process of Heart Teams when treating young patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with either TAVR or iSAVR and to identify the relevant considerations. Out of the considered factors, the variables most prominently featured in our ML model were congestive heart failure, established risk assessment scores, previous cardiac surgeries, a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and peripheral vascular disease. Our study demonstrates a viable application of ML-based approaches for studying and understanding complex clinical decision-making processes.

BACKGROUND We compared the outcomes and adverse events of TAVI patients based on the discharge and long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment regimens (single antiplatelet [SAPT] vs. dual antiplatelet [DAPT] vs. anticoagulation [OAC] vs. no treatment [NT]). METHODS The outcome of 532 consecutive patients treated with TAVI was evaluated. As the main study endpoint, the 1-year all-cause mortality was chosen to compare the different discharge treatment regimens and the 3-year all-cause mortality to compare the different long-term treatment regimens. The secondary endpoints were adverse events as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-II. RESULTS One-year survival after TAVI was highest amongst patients treated with DAPT compared to SAPT (P

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the differences in outcome arising from the use of semi-compliant (SCB) versus non-compliant balloon (NCB) systems for predilatation during self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS 251 TAVR procedures with the implantation of self-expanding valves after predilatation were analyzed. SCB systems were used in 166 and NCB systems in 85 patients. The primary endpoint was defined as device success, a composite endpoint comprising the absence of procedural mortality, correct valve positioning, adequate valve performance and the absence of more than a mild paravalvular leak. The secondary endpoints were chosen in accordance with the valve academic research consortium (VARC-2) endpoint definitions. RESULTS No significant differences were observed with regard to procedural device success between the SCB- and NCB cohort (SCB: 142 [85.5%%] vs. NCB: 77 [90.6%]; P = .257). There was a notable difference between the rates of conversion to open surgery and the postdilatation rate, both of which were higher for the NCB group (SCB: 1 [0.6%] vs. NCB: 4 [5.1%]; P = .042; SCB: 30 [18.1%] vs. NCB: 34 [40%]; P

(1) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is consumed during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A high AP depletion leads to an impaired outcome after cardiac surgery. However, data is scarce on the postoperative course of AP under venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) support. (2) A total of 239 patients with VA-ECMO support between 2000 and 2019 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery (Vienna General Hospital, Austria) were included in this retrospective analysis. Blood samples were collected at several timepoints (baseline, postoperative day (POD) 1–7, POD 14 and 30). Patients were categorized according to the relative AP drop (&lt, 60% vs. ≥60%) and ECMO duration (&lt, 5 days vs. ≥5 days). (3) Overall, 44.4% reached the baseline AP values within 5 days—this was only the case for 28.6% with a higher AP drop (compared to 62.7% with a lower drop, p = 0.000). A greater AP drop was associated with a significantly higher need for renal replacement therapy (40.9% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.002) and an impaired 1-year survival (51.4% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.031). (4) CPB exceeds the negative impact of VA-ECMO, still, ECMO seems to delay alkaline phosphatase recovery. A greater initial AP drop bears the risk of higher morbidity and mortality.

Background: Younger patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis are a particularly challenging collective with regard to the choice of intervention. High-risk patients younger than 75 years of age are often eligible for both the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and the isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (iSAVR). Data on the outcomes of both interventions in this set of patients are scarce. Methods: One hundred and forty-four propensity score-matched patients aged 75 years or less who underwent TAVR or iSAVR at the Hietzing Heart Center in Vienna, Austria, were included in the study. The mean age was 68.9 years (TAVR 68.7 vs. SAVR 67.6 years, p = 0.190) and the average EuroSCORE II was 5.4% (TAVR 4.3 [3.2%] vs. iSAVR 6.4 (4.3%), p = 0.194). Results: Postprocedural adverse event data showed higher rates of newly acquired atrial fibrillation (6.9% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.049), prolonged ventilation (2.8% vs. 25.0%, p &lt, 0.001) and multi-organ failure (0% vs. 6.9%) in the surgical cohort. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality was significantly higher for iSAVR (1.4% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.012, 12.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.009, respectively). The long-term survival (median follow-up 5.0 years (2.2–14.1 years)) of patients treated with the surgical approach was superior to that of patients undergoing TAVR (p &lt, 0.001). Conclusion: Although the survival analysis revealed a higher in-hospital and 30-day survival rate for high-risk patients aged ≤75 years who underwent TAVR, iSAVR was associated with a significantly higher long-term survival rate.