Search

Background: Various treatments have been employed in managing type B aortic dissection (TBAD), encompassing open surgical repair (OSR), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and optimal medical therapy (OMT). Nonetheless, the determination of the most efficacious treatment protocol remains a subject of debate. We aim to compare the treatments in patients with acute and subacute TBAD using a meta-analytic approach. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published from their inception up to September 2024. Studies comparing OSR, TEVAR, and OMT for TBAD through controlled or direct comparative designs were incorporated. Pairwise comparison meta-analyses were performed employing odds ratios (OR) alongside 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify intervention effects by using the random-effects model. Results: Thirty-one studies involving 34,681 patients with TBAD were included in the final meta-analysis. We noted OSR were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.41; 95%CI: 1.67–3.49; P < 0.001), paraplegia (OR: 3.60; 95%CI: 2.20–5.89; P < 0.001), limb ischemia (OR: 7.80; 95%CI: 2.39–25.49; P = 0.001) and bleeding (OR: 9.54; 95%CI: 6.57–13.85; P < 0.001) as compared with OMT. Moreover, OSR versus TEVAR showed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.67; 95%CI: 1.92–3.72; P < 0.001), acute renal failure (OR: 1.98; 95%CI: 1.61–2.42; P < 0.001), myocardial infaraction (OR: 2.76; 95%CI: 1.64–4.65; P < 0.001), respiratory failure (OR: 2.19; 95%CI: 1.73–2.76; P < 0.001), or bleeding (OR: 1.88; 95%CI: 1.33–2.67; P < 0.001), and lower risk of reintervention (OR: 0.30; 95%CI: 0.10–0.89; P = 0.030). Finally, TEVAR was associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR: 1.77; 95%CI: 1.41–2.21; P < 0.001), limb ischemia (OR: 13.00; 95%CI: 4.33–39.06; P < 0.001), and bleeding (OR: 3.65; 95%CI: 2.40–5.55; P < 0.001) as compared with OMT. Conclusions: This study systematically compared various treatments and showed their safety and efficacy for acute and subacute TBAD. The results require further large-scale randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intervention timing on thoracic aortic remodelling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for subacute and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS The study included 110 patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD at least 2 weeks after onset, sourced from the Tokushukai Medical Database. The primary outcome was complete thoracic aortic remodelling (CTR) at 1 year, defined as thoracic false lumen thrombosis and a false lumen diameter <10 mm up to the level of Th10. RESULTS The 1-year CTR rate was 67.3%. CTR was strongly associated with intervention timing: 88.4% (≤3 months: n  = 69), 57.1% (3–12 months: n  = 14) and 18.5% (≥12 months: n  = 27). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed a 3-month cutoff for achieving CTR (area under the curve 0.857). Multivariable analysis identified interval from onset to TEVAR >3 months (odds ratio [OR] 9.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86–33.28) and initial thoracic false lumen diameter (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.27) as independent predictors of CTR failure. Similar trends were observed in the DeBakey IIIb subgroup, with a 3-month cutoff for achieving CTR and interval from onset to TEVAR >3 months (OR 16.38, 95% CI 3.54–75.83), initial thoracic false lumen diameter (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00–1.54) and initial abdominal aortic diameters (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.29) predicting CTR failure. CONCLUSIONS Early TEVAR within 3 months of onset is crucial for achieving complete aortic remodelling in TBAD. Therefore, early preventive TEVAR in eligible patients is recommended to optimize outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch aneurysms is a minimally invasive procedure with improved results. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included 213 patients (TBAD, n=69; thoracic arch aneurysm [TAA], n=144; median age, 72 years; median follow-up period, 6 years) from May 2008 to February 2020. The following conditions were satisfied before performing zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR: TBAD; proximal landing zone (LZ): diameter <37 mm, length >15 mm, and nondissection area, proximal stent-graft: size ≤40 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%, and TAA; proximal LZ: diameter ≤42 mm and length >15 mm, proximal stent-graft: size ≤46 mm and oversizing rate: 10% to 20%. Of the 69 patients in the TBAD group, 34 (49.3%) had patent false lumen (PFL), and 35 (50.7%) had false lumen partial thrombosis (FLPT), including ulcer-like projections. Emergency procedures were performed in 33 (15.5%) patients. Results: There were no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality (TBAD: 1.5% vs TAA: 0.7%, p=0.544) or the in-hospital aortic complications (TBAD: n=1 vs TAA: n=5, p=0.666). Retrograde type A dissection was not observed in the TBAD group. The aortic event-free rates at 10 years were 89.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7%–95.3%) and 87.9% (95% CI: 80.3%–92.8%) in the TBAD and TAA groups, respectively (log-rank p=0.636). In the TBAD group, the early and late outcomes were not significantly different between the PFL and FLPT groups. Conclusion: Satisfactory early and long-term results were obtained with zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD. Clinical Impact: This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and expand the possibilities of zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using our treatment strategy. Satisfactory early and long-term results in the TBAD and thoracic arch aneurysm (TAA) groups were obtained with zones 1 and 2 landing TEVAR. The TBAD cases had the same good results as the TAA cases. Using our strategy, we especially might reduce complications and be an effective treatment for acute complicated TBAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report the initial outcomes of physician-modified inner branched endovascular repair (PMiBEVAR) for pararenal aneurysms (PRAs), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), and aortic arch aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 patients (6 men; median age, 83.0 years) treated using PMiBEVAR were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients were at high surgical risk because of severe comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score≥3 or emergency repair). End points were defined as technical success per patient and per vessel (successful deployment), clinical success (no endoleaks postoperatively), in-hospital death, and major adverse events. Results: There were 3 PRAs, 4 TAAAs, and 3 aortic arch aneurysms with 12 renal-mesenteric arteries and 3 left subclavian arteries incorporated by inner branches. The technical success rate was 90.0% (9/10) per patient and 93.3% (14/15) per vessel. The clinical success rate was 90% (9/10). There were 2 in-hospital deaths, unrelated to aneurysms. Paraplegia and shower emboli occurred separately in 2 patients. Three patients experienced prolonged ventilation for 3 days after surgery. Aneurysm sac shrinkage occurred in 4 patients, and aneurysm size stabilized in 1 patient during follow-up, more than 6 months later. None of the patients required intervention. Conclusion: PMiBEVAR is a feasible approach for treating complex aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients. This technology may complement the existing technology in terms of improved anatomical adaptability, no time delay and practicability in many countries. However, long-term durability remains undetermined. Further large-scale and long-term studies are needed. Clinical impact: This is the first clinical study to investigate outcomes of physician-modified inner branched endovascular repair (PMiBEVAR). PMiBEVAR for treating pararenal aneurysm, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, or aortic arch aneurysm is a feasible procedure. This technology is likely to complement existing technology in terms of improved anatomical adaptability (compared to off-the-shelf devices), no time delay (compared to custom-made devices), and the potential to be performed in many countries. On the other hand, surgery time varied greatly depending on the case, suggesting a learning curve and the need for technological innovation to perform more consistent surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim was to assess the mid-term aortic remodeling and bare-metal stent (BMS) integrity of the restricted bare stent (RBS) technique reconstruction in aortic dissections. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included prospectively collected patients treated with the modified RBS technique between 2017 and 2020. The preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scans were analyzed in the centerline at the mid-descending, celiac trunk (CeT), and the mid-abdominal levels for false lumen (FL) patency, aortic diameter, and true lumen (TL) diameter changes. Bare-metal stent integrity was assessed in the 3-dimensional multiplanar reformats. Results: The median follow-up of the cohort (n=17) was 26 (11, 45) months. The procedure was mainly performed with the Relay NBS endograft (15/17; 88%) + E-XL BMS (17/17; 100%). Postoperative mortality, paraplegia, stroke, renovisceral vessel loss, and type I and III endoleaks were not observed. BMS fractured in 6 patients (6/17; 36%), damaged the dissection flap in 4/17 (24%), and led to the reperfusion of the FL and re-interventions with TEVAR (4/17; 24%). Two patients without FL reperfusion showed stable CT follow-ups 13 and 17 months after the fracture diagnosis. The TL expansion was seen at all landmarks and peaked in the thoracic aorta (+10; 6, 15; p<0.001). The FL thrombosis after modified RBS was only relevant in the thoracic aorta (p<0.001) and at CeT (p=0.003). The aortic diameter was stable in the thoracic aorta and increased at distal landmarks (CeT [+5; 1, 10; p=0.001]; mid-abdominal [+3; 1, 5; p=0.004]). Conclusion: The modified RBS technique could not stop aortic growth below the diaphragm and prevent new membrane rupture due to the fractures of the BMS and consecutive flap damage with the reperfusion of the FL. Clinical Impact: The treatment of complicated type B aortic dissections with TEVAR has become a standard. Particularly, patients with true lumen collapse and malperfusion may benefit from a more aggressive treatment strategy including proximal TEVAR and distal bare-metal stent implantation to re-open the true lumen and to prevent distal stent-induced new entry. However, this study reports the challenges of this approach with a high rate of bare-metal stent fractures during the follow-up. The fractures that occurred at the site of vertical nitinol bridges led to the dissection membrane ruptures and the reperfusion of the false lumen with consecutive dilatation. A close follow-up is mandatory to detect this complication and to treat the patients with TEVAR extension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by means of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: This single-center prospective study was conducted in a tertiary aortic center on consecutive patients having undergone TEVAR with an endograft covering most of the 10 cm FET module with 2 to 4 mm oversizing. All patients were monitored by computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at sixth month and yearly thereafter. Results: From January 2015 to July 2022, among 159 patients who received FET, 30 patients (18.8%) underwent a TEVAR procedure (13 for a thoracoabdominal aneurysm, 11 for a chronic aortic dissection and 6 for an emergency procedure). All connections were successfully achieved with 2 postoperative deaths (6.6%) and 1 paraplegia (3.3%). At a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2–34.7), 5 patients (25%) required a fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) extension followed by 4 patients with 5 reinterventions, 3 for a Type 3 endoleak due to disconnection between FET and TEVAR endograft, and 2 unrelated to the FET for a secondary Type 1C endoleak. All reinterventions were successful, without mortality or morbidity. Conclusions: In this series, FET connection with a TEVAR endograft was effective with low postoperative morbidity but with a risk of aortic reintervention related to disconnection between the FET and TEVAR endograft. These results suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit in patients following connection of the FET with a TEVAR endograft. Clinical Impact: In this series of 30 patients, midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) showed 3 disconnections (10%) with a Type 3 endoleak between FET and TEVAR. These findings suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit. But so far, only a few studies provide some information after one year while the risk of disconnection increases over time and becomes a concern after 3 years. This is the new message brought by our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Lower serum ionized calcium (iCa2+) was reported to be associated with a higher risk of adverse events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to investigate the associations between preoperative serum iCa2+ and outcomes of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients receiving thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2019, 491 TBAD patients received TEVAR in a single center. Patients with acute or subacute TBAD were included. Serum iCa2+ (pH 7.4) was obtained from the arterial blood gas analysis before TEVAR. The study population was grouped into the hi-Ca group (1.11 mmol/L ≤ iCa2+ < 1.35 mmol/L) and lo-Ca group (iCa2+ < 1.11 mmol/L). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were any major adverse clinical events (MACEs), which included all-cause mortality and aortic-related severe complications. To eliminate bias, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. Results: Overall, 396 TBAD patients were included in this study. In the total population, there were 119 (30.1%) patients in the lo-Ca group. After PSM, 77 matched pairs were obtained for further analysis. In the matched population, the 30-day mortality and 30-day MACEs between the two groups presented significant differences (p=0.023 and 0.029, respectively). At 5 years, cumulative incidences of mortality (log-rank p<0.001) and MACEs (log-rank p=0.016) were significantly higher in the lo-Ca group than that of the hi-Ca group. Multivariate cox regression analysis indicated that lower preoperative iCa2+ (hazard ratio for per 0.1 mmol/L decrease, 2.191; 95% confidence interval, 1.487–3.228, p<0.001) was an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality after PSM. Conclusions: Lower preoperative serum iCa2+ might have an association with 5-year mortality in TBAD patients after TEVAR. Serum iCa2+ monitoring in this population may facilitate the identification of critical conditions. Clinical Impact: Our present study found that the cutoff value of preoperative serum iCa2+ 1.11 mmol/L, which is slightly lower than the lower limit of the normal range of 1.15-1.35 mmol/L, worked relatively well for discerning the high-risk and low-risk TBAD patients at 5 years. Serum iCa2+ monitoring in TBAD patients receiving TEVAR may facilitate the identification of critical conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Repairing thoracic aortic aneurysms with endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a safe and minimally invasive method with low morbidity and short postoperative recovery. We developed a novel method to treat descending thoracic aortic aneurysms using a mini-thoracotomy approach in complex patients with difficult access. Methods: A 56-year-old male patient presented with a 3-day history of chest pain. His past surgical history included infrarenal aortic ligation and right axillobifemoral bypass. Thoracic computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a saccular aortic aneurysmal dilatation at zone 2 measuring 4.4 × 4 cm. Owing to his surgical history, vascular access through the femoral and iliac arteries or abdominal aorta was impossible. We developed a new technique using a left posterolateral mini-thoracotomy approach to gain vascular access and perform TEVAR, avoiding the need for an open thoracotomy repair. Results and Conclusions: Thoracic CTA performed before discharge revealed complete aneurysmal exclusion and no endoleaks. Postoperative follow-up CTA (6 months and annually thereafter) revealed no aneurysm formation or aortic restenosis. The femoral artery, followed by the iliac artery, is the traditional access route for TEVAR. Left posterolateral mini-thoracotomy may be required as an alternative access in complex patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pro-Glide, a suture-mediated vascular closure device, regarding technical success and complications in patients who had undergone aortic intervention and had previous groin intervention (PGI). Methods: One hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair via the femoral artery and were closed with the Pro-Glide device were analyzed retrospectively. PGI was defined as a history of open surgical access to the femoral artery or wide sheath (>18 F) placement due to endovascular or valvular intervention. The patients were divided into two groups 38 cases with PGI and 97 cases without PGI. Results: The overall success rate of closure of the femoral artery with Pro-Glide was not statistically significant between the two groups (93.8% vs 92.1%, p =.711). Sheath sizes were compared between the groups and PGI (+) group had significantly higher sheath sizes compared to PGI (−) group (24.3 ± 1.1 F vs 23.8 ± 1.0 F, p =.011). Three patients in the PGI (+) group and six patients in the PGI (−) group experienced technical failure of the percutaneous femoral approach. Femoral complications were seen after the procedures in four patients in the PGI (+) group and four in the PGI (−) group. The PGI (+) group had a higher complication rate when compared to the PGI (−) group; however, this was not statistically significant (p =.181). Conclusion: The present study was conducted on a significantly larger sample compared to previous studies and the findings suggest that the Pro-Glide vascular closure device is a safe option for patients with a history of PGI and may not be considered as a contraindication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch are a great challenge for vascular surgeons. Maintaining the patency of supra-aortic branches while excluding the aortic lesion remains difficult. Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) with fenestrations provides a feasible and effective approach for this type of disease. The main purpose of this trial is to assess the safety and validity of extracorporeal fenestration and in situ fenestration in patients with aortic disease involving the left subclavian artery. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled study. A total of 170 eligible patients will be recruited from The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in China and randomized on a 1:1 basis either to the group A (extracorporeal fenestration) or the group B (in situ fenestration). The primary outcome will be the all-cause mortality (30 days). The secondary outcomes will include incidence of secondary intervention (30 days, 6 months, 1 year), incidence of endoleak (30 days, 6 months, 1 year), incidence of major adverse events (MAE) (i.e., immediate procedural success and complications) (30 days, 6 months, 1 year), immediate technical success rate, and all-cause mortality (6 months, 1 year). Discussion: Suppose extracorporeal fenestration non-inferior to in situ fenestration in patients with aortic disease involving the left subclavian artery. This trial aims to demonstrate the safety and validity of extracorporeal fenestration and in situ fenestration in patients with aortic disease involving the left subclavian artery, which is expected to provide a reference for Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) with fenestrations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06256757. Registered on February 5, 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06256757. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of stiff wire-based 2D3D, 3D3D image fusion (IF), and non-image fusion techniques for simple zone 2 and zone 3 TEVAR cases in terms of radiation exposure, contrast dose, and fusion and projection accuracy. Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted based on data gathered from patients who underwent TEVAR between 2016 and 2023 at our tertiary aortic referral center. Those who underwent Z2 and Z3 TEVAR during the indicated period were included. The dose area product and number of DSAs were considered as primary outcomes, while projection accuracy and image fusion accuracy were considered as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 79 patient were included. They were allocated to non-image fusion (NIF, n = 40), 2D3D IF (n = 14), and 3D3D IF (n = 25) groups. DAP was significantly lower both in the NIF [1542.75 µGym2 (751.72–3351.25 µGym2), p = 0.011] and 2D3D IF [1320.1 µGym2 (858.57–2572.07 µGym2), p = 0.013 groups compared to the 3D3D [2758.61 µGym2 (2074.73–4772.9 µGym2)] cohort. In the Z3 subgroup, DAP was significantly lower in the 2D3D IF group compared to the 3D3D IF group [(1270.84 µGym2 (860.56–2144.69 µGym2) vs. 2735.76 µGym2 (1583.86–5077.23 µGym2), p = 0.044]. 2D3D image fusion was associated with a significantly lower number of pre-deployment angiographies compared to NIF [1 (1–1) vs. 2 (1–3), p = 0.031], which we used as a surrogate for contrast dose. Conclusions: The entire study population analysis showed a significantly lower DAP with 2D3D IF compared to 3D3D IF, while there was no significant difference compared to NIF. It seems that stiff wire-based 2D3D IF does not cost in terms of DAP compared to NIF, while it is more favorable compared to 3D3D IF. Additionally, simple Z3 TEVAR cases might be improved by implementing the stiff wire-based 2D3D technique as a result of decreased DAP compared to 3D3D IF and decreased contrast dose compared to NIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The safety of endovascular treatment, such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), for a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm has been well-established, with a reported low postoperative mortality rate but higher incidences of long-term complications such as endo-leakage, device failure, and aneurysm-related death. Based on this, we report the first case of massive thoracic vertebral body erosion due to a perianeurysmal outpouching lesion after TEVAR. Case presentation: A 77-year-old female with a history of TEVAR due to descending thoracic aortic arch aneurysm 4 years ago was referred from the cardiovascular clinic to the spine center. The patient presented with persisting back pain, which began 3 years after TEVAR and progressively worsened. Physical examination was notable for tenderness in the upper thoracic region without any neurological deficits. Computed tomography of the aorta and thoracic spine showed bony erosion into the T5–T7 vertebral bodies. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine confirmed a perianeurysmal outpouching lesion eroding into the T5–T7 vertebral bodies due to pulsating pressure. We performed the posterior instrumented fusion from T3 to T9 at the thoracic spine and TEVAR at remnant endo-leakage lesions. Conclusions: Since the progression of such a condition can have a catastrophic outcome, and because the treatment options vary, serial follow-up through an interdisciplinary approach is important in cases with a high index of suspicion of a perianeurysmal outpouching lesion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The number of interventional procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements or thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, is on the rise. Intraprocedural cardiac arrest is a rare occurrence during high-risk procedures. Modern hybrid-operating tables may adversely affect chest compression quality due to their flexibility. To investigate this relationship, we analyzed the blood pressure generated during chest compressions at different degrees of table extension and assessed the effect of an additional stabilization bar to secure the table. Methods: A CPR manikin was connected to online blood pressure monitoring on a hybrid operating table. Chest compressions were administered using a mechanical device (at 100 bpm and 80 bpm). Hemodynamic effects were evaluated at various degrees of table extension (0%, 50%, 100% table extension) and with the addition of a stabilization bar. Results: A greater degree of table extension was associated with lower diastolic blood pressure. The addition of a stabilization bar alleviated this drop in diastolic blood pressure and enabled the generation of higher mean arterial pressures at 50% and 100% table extension during chest compressions. Conclusion: The flexibility of a hybrid operating table adversely impacts the hemodynamic effect of chest compressions. This effect may be mitigated by using a stabilization bar. These results may be relevant for providing further recommendations for CPR guidelines in hybrid OR settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Zone 2 anastomosis with total cervical branch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection and aortic arch aneurysms became possible after stent-graft introduction. This may be an easier procedure and reduce the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes between Zone 2 and Zone 3 distal anastomoses. Methods: After evaluating the patient data in our institute between April 2016 and April 2022, the patients in whom distal anastomosis was performed at Zone 2 with a stent-graft were defined as the Zone 2 group (n = 70). The patients in whom distal anastomosis was performed at Zone 3 were defined as the Zone 3 group (n = 24). Results: The incidence of new-onset recurrent nerve palsy was one patient (1.4%) in the Zone 2 group and six patients (25.0%) in the Zone 3 group (p < 0.001). The lower body perfusion arrest time was 44.3 ± 9.1 min in the Zone 2 group and 52.9 ± 12.8 min in the Zone 3 group (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality and morbidities. Multivariable analysis showed that only age was an independent predictor of overall mortality. Conclusions: Performing distal anastomosis at Zone 2 with a frozen elephant trunk or stent-graft reduced the lower body perfusion arrest time and possibly prevented recurrent nerve palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Various treatments have been employed in managing type B aortic dissection (TBAD), encompassing open surgical repair (OSR), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and optimal medical therapy (OMT). Nonetheless, the determination of the most efficacious treatment protocol remains a subject of debate. We aim to compare the treatments in patients with acute and subacute TBAD using a meta-analytic approach. Methods A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published from their inception up to September 2024. Studies comparing OSR, TEVAR, and OMT for TBAD through controlled or direct comparative designs were incorporated. Pairwise comparison meta-analyses were performed employing odds ratios (OR) alongside 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify intervention effects by using the random-effects model. Results Thirty-one studies involving 34,681 patients with TBAD were included in the final meta-analysis. We noted OSR were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.41; 95%CI: 1.67–3.49; P

Abstract Interventional occlusion of Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is generally efficacious and complications such as delayed occluder displacement are infrequent. Herein, we report a case of 24-year-old female with a history of unsuccessful PDA closures, who subsequently experienced delayed occluder displacement into the left main pulmonary artery. Despite numerous unsuccessful catheter-based interventions, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was successfully executed. This procedure effectively resolved the PDA without any postprocedural complications. This case highlights the efficacy and safety of TEVAR as a viable alternative for managing complex PDA cases involving occluder displacement.

A 52-year-old woman presented with chest pain, shortness of breath and loss of sensation in her left limbs. Computed tomography angiography revealed an type A aortic dissection involving the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery. Endovascular therapy successfully managed the condition by reconstructing the artery and occluding the false lumen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The optimal treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) involving arch anomalies remain unclear. Methods We consecutively enrolled patients with cTBAD involving arch anomalies who underwent endovascular repair using a single-branched stent graft (SBSG) at our medical center between January 2020 and January 2023. The demographics, clinical manifestation, operation detail, and follow-up outcomes of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results A total of 16 patients (14 men; 55.8 ± 11.7 years) were enrolled, including isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) (n = 6), aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) (n = 7), and right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) with Kommerell’s diverticulum (KD) (n = 3). Among them, six patients with multi-branched arch anomalies. The endovascular management strategies of patients were diverse based on their aortic morphology. The early outcome demonstrated that one patient experienced an immediate intraoperative type Ia endoleak, which was resolved by balloon dilation, and two patients exhibited bird-beak configuration. After a median of follow-up of 910 (743–1023) days, the long-term outcome revealed that two patients developed endoleak. No death, retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD), paraplegia, stent graft-induced new entry tear (SINE), or branch section stenosis of SBSG were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion Our limited experience suggests that endovascular repair with a SBSG appears to be a relatively safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for patients with cTBAD and arch anomalies.

Abstract Background To investigate the value of dual-source CT combined with volumetric measurement in the follow-up of Stanford Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) intrathoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods 40 TBAD patients in our hospital were treated with TEVAR and followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Dual-source CT and volumetric measurements were used to calculate the diameters and areas of the true and false lumen and the total lumen of the left subclavian artery at a distance of 2 cm (P1), the middle part of the descending aorta (P2), the opening of the abdominal trunk (P3) and the anterior bifurcation of the abdominal aorta (P4) before and after surgery. The maximum diameter, maximum area, volume and modified aortic remodeling index (MARI) of the true and false lumen of the distal abdominal aortic dissection were measured to evaluate the postoperative vascular remodeling. Results The true cavity diameter of P1 and P2 increased gradually, the false cavity diameter decreased gradually (P

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical outcomes and the validity of the in situ needle fenestration (ISNF) technique during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with aortic arch conditions. Methods A total of 115 patients with aortic arch conditions treated with ISNF during TEVAR between January 2018 and December 2021 were incorporated. Results The median age of the patients was 62.0 years, and 10.4% (12/115) were female. The median follow-up time was 31.0 months. A total of 175 supra-arch branches were reconstructed. A single branch was fenestrated in 80 patients, while the left subclavian artery (LSA) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) were fenestrated simultaneously in 11 patients, and all supra-arch branches were fenestrated in 24 patients. The rate of technical success was 100%, 30-day mortality was 3.5% (4/115), overall mortality was 8.7% (10/115), and aortic-related mortality was 2.6% (3/115). Aortic-related reintervention was required in 7.8% (9/115) of patients. Among the major postoperative complications, four patients developed retrograde type A dissection requiring emergent open surgery, three patients had cerebrovascular accidents, and one patient had an endoleak. No occlusions or stenoses of the main or branch aortic stents were observed. Conclusions The mid-term results of the ISNF technique during TEVAR for aortic arch conditions were within the acceptable range; however, further follow-up results are needed and long-term stability and durability needs to be assessed. Related fenestration devices also require further development.

Objective: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains a debilitating complication, occurring in 10% of patients. Studies have shown that extended aortic coverage is a risk factor for SCI. This study evaluates whether extended aortic length coverage is a significant risk factor for SCI. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 277 consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR successfully between 2006 and 2021 at a single institution. The patients were classified into 2 groups: ≥205 mm and

Background: The optimal treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) involving arch anomalies remain unclear. Methods: We consecutively enrolled patients with cTBAD involving arch anomalies who underwent endovascular repair using a single-branched stent graft (SBSG) at our medical center between January 2020 and January 2023. The demographics, clinical manifestation, operation detail, and follow-up outcomes of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 16 patients (14 men; 55.8 ± 11.7 years) were enrolled, including isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) (n = 6), aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) (n = 7), and right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) with Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) (n = 3). Among them, six patients with multi-branched arch anomalies. The endovascular management strategies of patients were diverse based on their aortic morphology. The early outcome demonstrated that one patient experienced an immediate intraoperative type Ia endoleak, which was resolved by balloon dilation, and two patients exhibited bird-beak configuration. After a median of follow-up of 910 (743–1023) days, the long-term outcome revealed that two patients developed endoleak. No death, retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD), paraplegia, stent graft-induced new entry tear (SINE), or branch section stenosis of SBSG were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion: Our limited experience suggests that endovascular repair with a SBSG appears to be a relatively safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for patients with cTBAD and arch anomalies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Total endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms is feasible in select patients. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of total endovascular arch repair using 3-vessel company-manufactured devices (CMDs) and physician-modified endo grafts (PMEGs). Methods: Patients unfit for open repair who underwent 3-vessel total arch repair at a single institution from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Patients received either 3-vessel inner-branch CMDs or PMEGs. Three-vessel designs were used to incorporate the innominate, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries. The antegrade inner branches in both devices were accessed via right brachial or carotid approach. The left carotid was accessed via carotid cutdown or femoral approach. The left subclavian artery was accessed via transfemoral approach. The study endpoints included procedural technical success, patient survival, neurologic events, cardiac complications, reinterventions, and target artery patency. Results: Nine patients underwent treatment. Four patients were treated with PMEGs, and 5 with CMDs. Procedural technical success was 100%. There were no in-hospital deaths. There were no strokes, transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, or spinal ischemia in the perioperative period. Major adverse events occurred in 3 patients (33%). Two (22%) vascular access complications and one (11%) acute kidney injury occurred. One (11%) patient required early reintervention for an access complication. The median follow-up period was 358 days (CMD, 392 days; PMEG, 198 days). There was a late reintervention and conversion to open repair at 142 days of follow-up in a patient with a PMEG that developed an aortic infection, leading to death on postoperative day 239. The mean length of stay was 7±4 days. Computed tomography imaging obtained during the immediate postoperative period revealed endoleak in 6 (66%) patients, out of which 5 resolved spontaneously and 1 required reintervention via left subclavian artery stenting. Target artery patency was 100% at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions: Three-vessel total endovascular aortic arch repair using a CMD or PMEG is feasible with optimal early outcomes. Physician-modified stent-grafts are a feasible option for patients who do not meet anatomic criteria for CMDs. Clinical Impact: Management of aortic arch disease remains a significant challenge in vascular surgery. This study showcases the feasibility and safety of using a total endovascular approach to repair the aortic arch, which could potentially reduce morbidity and mortality associated with traditional surgical approaches. The results suggest that this minimally invasive technique could be an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients and could significantly improve outcomes for those requiring aortic arch repair. Overall, this study represents a promising development in the field of endovascular surgery and highlights the potential to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have adopted a simple and reproducible approach, "minimal manipulation approach," since January 2021 in five patients to minimize the risk of thromboembolic events during Zone 1 and 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVARs) with shaggy aorta. The approach consists of two parts: ① Use of a 65-cm-long sheath (dry seal) to deliver the endografts without touching the protruding atheroma. Covering the atheroma with the first endograft delivered at Zone 3 to the mid-descending aorta (paving the aorta), and second endograft insertion and deployment through the paved aorta with first endograft. ② Protection of the left subclavian artery using balloon catheter during TEVAR. No in-hospital mortality was recorded, and none of the patients had stroke, spinal cord ischemia, or distal embolic events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate the value of dual-source CT combined with volumetric measurement in the follow-up of Stanford Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) intrathoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: 40 TBAD patients in our hospital were treated with TEVAR and followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Dual-source CT and volumetric measurements were used to calculate the diameters and areas of the true and false lumen and the total lumen of the left subclavian artery at a distance of 2 cm (P1), the middle part of the descending aorta (P2), the opening of the abdominal trunk (P3) and the anterior bifurcation of the abdominal aorta (P4) before and after surgery. The maximum diameter, maximum area, volume and modified aortic remodeling index (MARI) of the true and false lumen of the distal abdominal aortic dissection were measured to evaluate the postoperative vascular remodeling. Results: The true cavity diameter of P1 and P2 increased gradually, the false cavity diameter decreased gradually (P < 0.05), and the total and true cavity diameter of P3 and P4 increased (P < 0.05). After operation, the true cavity area of P1 and P2 gradually increased, and the false cavity area decreased (P < 0.05). The total area of P3, P4, and true cavity increased gradually after operation (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in true and false lumen volume and MARI before and after surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with diameter measurement and area measurement, volume measurement can more accurately reflect the remodeling of the true and false lumen of the uncoated aortic dissection. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) in elective settings has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes. However, life-threatening conditions such as rupture are more often managed with open surgical repair due to the high complexity of arch endovascular repair, lack of available off-the-shelf devices, and limited long-term data. Case Summary: A 49-year-old female with a recent history of prior ascending aortic repair for Type A10 aortic dissection presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed acute bilateral pulmonary emboli and a 6.2 cm post dissection aneurysm of the posterior aortic arch with the dissection extending to the right iliac artery. She was treated with thrombolysis and subsequently became hemodynamically unstable. Repeat CTA revealed a massive left hemithorax with concern for aortic arch rupture. Given significant cardiorespiratory compromise and recent open repair, she was considered unfit for redo open repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a physician-modified endograft (PMEG) was planned. An Alpha Zenith endograft was modified adding an internal branch for the innominate artery and a fenestration for the left common carotid artery. The left subclavian artery was occluded with a microvascular plug and coil embolization up to the level of the vertebral artery. TEVAR PMEG extension to the celiac artery was performed followed by deployment of a Zenith dissection stent to the aortic bifurcation. Completion angiogram demonstrated successful aneurysm exclusion and patency of target vessels. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of ruptured TAA with PMEGs is feasible. This approach may be an alternative for unfit patients for open repair in emergent settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endovascular stent grafting is becoming more common in treating complex thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. When it becomes necessary to cover the supra-aortic vessels, maintaining blood supply through the supra-aortic branches can be achieved by performing in situ needle fenestration. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with a type B aortic dissection that extended from the origin of the left subclavian artery. A stent graft was inserted into the thoracic aorta distally of the origin of the left common carotid artery. Due to the stent graft moving distally and not adequately sealing the subclavian artery, a second stent graft was placed more proximally. Both stent grafts were successfully in situ fenestrated using a needle, and a stent graft was inserted into the subclavian artery. In conclusion, during thoracic endovascular aortic repair, in situ needle fenestration can be successfully carried out on two overlapping thoracic stent grafts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the outcomes of totally percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture for left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration (ISMF) and chimney technique in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and methods: Data on patients who underwent either chimney–TEVAR (n = 89) or ISMF–TEVAR (n = 113) from October 2018 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and major complications at 30 days and during follow-up. Results: The technical success rate was 84.3% in the chimney group and 93.8% in the ISMF group (p = 0.027). The incidence of immediate endoleakage was significantly higher in the chimney than ISMF group (15.7% vs 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.027). The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the chimney and ISMF groups were 98.9% ± 1.1% vs 98.1% ± 0.9% and 86.5% ± 6.3% vs 92.6% ± 4.1%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.715). The 3-year rate of cumulative freedom from branch occlusion in the chimney and ISMF group was 95.4% ± 2.3% vs 100%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Conclusion: Both ISMF–TEVAR and chimney–TEVAR achieved satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes for the preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD. ISMF–TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes with higher patency and lower reintervention rates. However, ISMF–TEVAR had longer operation times with higher procedure expenses. Clinical relevance statement: When LSA revascularization is required during TEVAR, in situ, fenestration, and chimney techniques are all safe and effective methods; in situ, fenestration-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes, but takes longer and is more complicated. Key Points: LSA revascularization during TEVAR reduces post-operative complication rates. Both in situ ISMF–TEVAR and chimney–TEVAR are safe and effective techniques for the preservation of the LSA during TEVAR. The chimney technique is associated with a higher incidence of endoleakage and branch occlusion, but ISMF–TEVAR is a more complicated and expensive technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES Thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic stenosis may be concomitant diseases requiring both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (T/EVAR) in high-risk patients for surgical approaches, but temporal management is not clearly defined yet. The aim of the study was to analyse outcomes of simultaneous versus staged TAVI and T/EVAR. METHODS Retrospective observational multicentre study was performed on patients requiring TAVI and T/EVAR from 2016 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 'Simultaneous group' if T/EVAR + TAVI were performed in the same procedure and 'Staged group' if T/EVAR and TAVI were performed in 2 steps, but within 3 months. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30-day mortality/major adverse events and follow-up survival. Secondary outcomes were procedural metrics and length of stay. RESULTS Forty-four cases were collected; 8 (18%) had T/EVAR and 36 (82%) had EVAR, respectively. Upon temporal determination, 25 (57%) and 19 (43%) were clustered in Simultaneous and Staged groups, respectively. In Staged group, median time between procedures was 72 (interquartile range—IQR: 57–87) days. Preoperative and intraoperative figures were similar. There was no difference in 30-day mortality (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 1/19; P = 0.43). Pulmonary events (Simultaneous: 0/25 versus Staged: 5/19; P = 0.01) and need of postoperative cardiac pacemaker (Simultaneous: 2/25 versus Staged: 7/19; P = 0.02) were more frequent in Staged patients. The overall length of stay was lower in the Simultaneous group [Simultaneous: 7 (IQR: 6–8) versus Staged: 19 (IQR: 15–23) days; P = 0.001]. The median follow-up was 25 (IQR: 8–42) months and estimated 3-year survival was 73% with no difference between groups (Simultaneous: 82% versus Staged: 74%; P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Both Simultaneous or Staged T/EVAR and TAVI procedures are effective with satisfactory outcomes. Despite the small numbers, simultaneous repair seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications, maintaining similar follow-up survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate early and late outcomes by comparing open total arch repair and endovascular arch repair using proximal landing zone analysis in a multicentre cohort. METHODS From 2008 to 2019, patients treated surgically for aortic arch disease at 6 centres were included, excluding cases with type A aortic dissection, additional aortic root replacement and extensive aortic aneurysm. In all patients and populations with proximal landing zones 0/1 (N  = 144) and 2 (N  = 187), early and late outcomes were compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 1052 patients, including 331 (31%) and 721 (69%) patients undergoing endovascular arch repair and open total arch repair, respectively, were enrolled. After propensity score match (endovascular arch repair, 295; open total arch repair, 566), no significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality rate (endovascular arch repair, 6.8%; open total arch repair, 6.2%; P  = 0.716). Open total arch repair was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death [log-rank test; P  = 0.010, hazard ratio (HR) 1.41 (95% confidence interval 1.17–1.71)]. The incidence of aorta-related death was higher in endovascular arch repair [Gray's test; P  = 0.030, HR; 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.20–1.73)]. When compared to endovascular arch repair with proximal landing zone 0/1, open total arch repair was associated with lower risks of all-cause death [log-rank test; P  < 0.001, HR 2.04 (95% confidence interval 1.43–2.90)] and aorta-related death [Gray's test; P  = 0.002, HR 1.67 (95% confidence interval; 1.25–2.24)]. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause death [log-rank test; P  = 0.961, HR 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.67–1.46)] and aorta-related death [Gray's test; P  = 0.55, HR 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.67)] between endovascular arch repair with proximal landing zone 2 and open total arch repair. CONCLUSIONS Open total arch repair was considered the 1st choice based on early and late results; however, endovascular arch repair may be a useful option if the proximal landing zone is limited to zone 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to create a morphology grading system, solely based on 2D images from computed tomography angiography, to predict negative aortic remodelling (NAR) for patients with high risk uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This single centre retrospective cohort study extracted and analysed consecutive patients diagnosed with high risk uncomplicated TBAD. Negative aortic remodelling was defined as an increase in the false lumen or total aortic diameter, or decrease in the true lumen diameter. The multivariable Cox regression model identified risk factors and a prediction model was created for two year freedom from NAR. A three category grading system, in which patients were classified into low, medium, and high risk groups, was further developed and internally validated. Of 351 patients included, 99 (28%) developed NAR. The median age was 52 years (interquartile range 45, 62 years) and 56 (16%) were female. The rate of two year freedom from NAR was 71% (95% CI 65 – 77%). After the multivariable Cox regression analysis, Patent false lumen, Aberrant right subclavian artery, Taper ratio, abdominal circumferential Extent, coeliac artery or reNal artery involved, and four channel dissection (Three false lumens) remained independent predictors and were included in the PATENT grading system. The risk score was statistically significantly associated with NAR (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.14 – 1.29; p <.001). The medium and high risk groups demonstrated a higher rate of NAR (medium risk, HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.57 – 5.01; p =.001; high risk, HR 4.39; 95% CI 2.58 – 7.48; p <.001). The grading system was characterised by robust discrimination with Harrell's C index of 0.68 (95% CI 0.63 – 0.75). The PATENT grading system was characterised by good discrimination and calibration, which may serve as a clinician friendly tool to aid risk stratification for TBAD patients after TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adequate proximal and distal seal zones are necessary for successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Often, the achievement of an adequate distal seal zone requires celiac artery (CA) coverage by endograft with or without preservation of CA blood flow. The outcomes of CA coverage without its flow preservation were studied only in small case series. This study aims to determine the difference in outcomes between CA coverage with vs without preservation of CA blood flow during TEVAR using a multi-institutional national database. The Vascular Quality Initiative database was reviewed for all TEVAR patients distally landing in zone 6. The cohort was divided into TEVAR with vs without CA flow preservation. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics, as well as postoperative mortality, morbidities, and complications, were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Of 25,549 reviewed patients, 772 had a distal landing in Zone 6, 212 of which (27.5%) had TEVAR without CA flow preservation, whereas 560 (72.5%) underwent TEVAR with CA flow preservation. Indications for TEVAR were aneurysm in 431 (55.8%), dissection in 247 (32.0%), or other in 94 (12.2%) cases. Patients who underwent TEVAR without CA flow preservation had statistically significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (11.3% vs 5.9%; P =.010), 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (8.0% vs 4.3%; P =.039), as well as a tendency of increased intestinal ischemia requiring intervention (1.9% vs 0.5%; P =.077). After adjusting for potential confounders, CA coverage without flow preservation was associated with more than a two-fold increase in the overall 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-5.92; P =.006) and 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.11-6.72; P =.029). In a sub-group analysis based on disease pathology, these results persisted only in the aneurysm group (30-day mortality [OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.01-5.48; P =.047]; 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.08-7.67; P =.034]), whereas there was no significant association between CA flow preservation status and the endpoints in the dissection subgroup (30-day mortality [OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.22-6.05; P =.856], 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.16-5.19; P =.911]). CA coverage during TEVAR without preservation of its blood flow is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients with aortic aneurysm, but not dissection. In patients with aortic aneurysm, CA flow should be preserved during TEVAR whenever feasible, whereas in patients with dissection, it may be safe to cover CA without preservation of its flow. Prospective studies should be done to confirm these findings and compare the open vs endovascular revascularization techniques on outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to determine the influences of varying severity of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) on the outcomes after thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This observational study focused on individuals with TBAD plus SAS who received TEVAR between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into groups according to the results of the portable sleep-breathing monitoring systems: mild SAS (MSAS) and moderate-to-severe SAS (MSSAS). Clinical profiles were collected and analyzed. A total of 121 cases with TBAD plus SAS who underwent TEVAR were enrolled in this study. Two groups were formed by stratifying these cases: MSAS (74 cases) and MSSAS (47 cases). The MSSAS cases were found to be older relative to MSAS cases (51.7 ± 8.3 years vs 57.1 ± 12.8 years; P =.012) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 25.7 ± 2.3 kg/m2vs 27.0 ± 2.3 kg/m2; P =.038). The investigation did not find any appreciable differences between the MSAS and MSSAS groups in terms of complications (endoleak, P =.403; stent-induced new entry, P >.999; and stent displacement: P >.999). However, the MSSAS group exhibited a significantly higher overall mortality rate compared with the MSAS group (log-rank P =.027). The tendency continued when examining cases with Marfan syndrome combined with MSSAS, where the overall mortality rate was significantly greater compared with Marfan syndrome cases with MSAS (log-rank P =.037). The absence of a significant difference was noteworthy in the freedom from reintervention between the MSAS and MSSAS groups (log-rank P =.278). The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in MSSAS group even after adjusting for varying potential confounders in the multivariate cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.875; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-2.586; P =.012). A markedly higher rate of distal stent dilation in the MSSAS group was also observed compared with the MSAS group (HR, 2.5 mm/year [95% CI, 2-3 mm/year] vs HR, 4 mm/year [95% CI, 2.0-5.5 mm/year]; P =.029). MSSAS is associated with a significantly higher risk of overall mortality and dilation rate of the distal stent after TEVAR for TBAD patients. Hence, aggressive efforts to reverse the severity of SAS in time in these individuals seem to be necessary. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To examine whether the type of aortic pathology affects periprocedural outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Material and Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 47 TEVAR patients in total. Based on the kind of aortic pathology, the patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (n=23) included patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), Group 2 (n=14) included patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA), and Group 3 (n=10) included patients with thoracic aortic mural thrombus (TAMT). Preprocedural basic clinical features, procedural data, and postprocedural outcomes and complications were compared between the groups. Results: The study population consisted of 36 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 62.48±14.2 years. Most of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 were male (82.6% and 92.8%), while 40% of the patients in Group 3 were male, and this difference was statistically significant. Compared to patients in other groups, individuals in Group 2 were significantly older and exhibited a higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease. Group 3 required thromboembolectomy more frequently during the postprocedural period. In terms of other postprocedural outcomes, complications and mortality, there were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the type of aortic pathology did not significantly influence periprocedural outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The TEVAR procedure can be effectively performed in suitable patients with various pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery annual surgery survey, the number of aortic surgery has been increasing constantly in the last two decades, with the rates approximately doubling in each decade (5,167, 11,956, and 22,708 cases in 1999, 2009, and 2019, respectively). In 2019, aortic surgery was performed for 11,036 (49%) nondissecting unruptured aneurysm, 730 (3%) ruptured aneurysm, 6,351 (28%) acute type A aortic dissection, 1,412 (6%) chronic type A aortic dissection, 2,385 (11%) acute type B aortic dissection, and 703 (3%) chronic type B aortic dissection cases. The outcomes have been improving annually. From 1999 to 2019, the hospital mortality rates decreased significantly in each case: nondissecting unruptured aneurysm, 9.8% to 4.2%; ruptured aneurysm, 38.5% to 19.7%; acute type A aortic dissection, 18.7% to 10.4%; chronic type A aortic dissection, 7.2% to 4.5%; acute type B aortic dissection, 25.2% to 9.8%; and chronic type B aortic dissection, 7.5% to 3.4%. Furthermore, stent graft, a new technology developed in 1990, was performed in 35%, 53%, 1%, 21%, 62%, and 75% of cases mentioned above, respectively, in 2019. The widespread use of stent graft greatly contributed to the increased number of aortic surgeries and improvement of surgical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of endovascular aortic surgery has led to the rise of novel techniques and devices in treating pathologies of the aorta. While endovascular surgery has been well established in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta, the endovascular treatment of the aortic arch represents a new and exciting territory for aortic surgeons. This article will discuss the different aortic diseases amenable to endovascular treatment, currently available aortic arch stent grafts and their limitations, and the future of endovascular aortic arch therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred treatment for severe blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). Successful outcomes rely on accurate endograft sizing, but initial imaging may underestimate aortic diameters. This study examines the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on endograft sizing and clinical outcomes in BTAI patients. Methods: A prospectively collected multi-institutional dataset from the Aortic Trauma Foundation was analyzed. Patients with BTAI undergoing TEVAR with IVUS were compared to patients who underwent TEVAR alone. Demographics and operative variables were compared, focusing on IVUS effects on endograft sizing by examining maximal proximal and distal aortic diameter on initial CT imaging compared to the graft diameters used during TEVAR. Results: 293 patients underwent TEVAR for BTAI with IVUS utilized in 124 cases (42.3%). The average graft size in the IVUS and non-IVUS groups were similar proximally (26.91 ± 4.3 mm IVUS vs 27.77 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.116) and distally (25.96 ± 4.7 mm IVUS vs 26.51 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS). IVUS did not impact the difference between graft size and initial CT measurements proximally (4.32 ± 4.8 mm IVUS vs 4.23 ± 3.9 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.859) or distally (4.17 ± 5.9 mm IVUS vs 4.50 ± 4.3 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.606). Although delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke occurred less frequently in IVUS patients (0.8% IVUS vs 7.1% non- IVUS, P = 0.024), in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (5.6% IVUS vs 7.7% non-IVUS, P = 0.581). Conclusions: IVUS is not associated with significant changes in endograft sizing compared to sizing based on CT scan alone in BTAI patients. IVUS was not associated with differences in mortality but was associated with a decrease in delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Routine IVUS in BTAI patients may not be necessary for accurate sizing, but there may be a relationship between IVUS and stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES To evaluate gender-related outcomes during endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases (TEVAR). METHODS Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study. All TEVARs between January 2005 and April 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were vascular access complications, and freedom from TEVAR-related reintervention. Interventions performed in male patients were matched to females on the basis of a one-to-one coarsened exact matching. RESULTS We identified 151 males who were matched with 151 females. Mortality at 30 days was not statistically different between females and males (11.2% vs 11.2%; P  =   1.0). At binary logistic regression analysis, duration of intervention (P  =   0.001) and emergency TEVAR (P  =   0.001) were associated with mortality at 30 days. Gender did not impact the access vessel complication rate [ n  = 6 (4.0%) vs n  = 5 (3.3%); P  =   1.0]. The median follow-up was 46 (interquartile range, 7–84) months with no difference between males and females [median 50 (11–95) vs 37.5 (3.5–71.2); P  =   0.153]. Estimated survival was not statistically different between females and males [log-rank χ2 = 0.6, P  =   0.442; 95% confidence interval (CI) 110.7–207.3]. At Cox's regression analysis, gender did not impact overall survival (hazard ratio 0.8; 95% CI 0.6–1.3; P  =   0.450). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related reinterventions was not statistically different between females and males (log-rank χ2 = 0.4, P  =   0.837; 95% CI 187.8–219.3). CONCLUSIONS Female gender itself was not associated with worse 30-day mortality and late survival than males with similar access vessel complication as well as TEVAR-related reintervention rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the results of isolated left subclavian artery in-situ fenestration (ISF) during 'zone 2' thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using a new adjustable needle puncturing device system. METHODS It is a multicentre, retrospective, physician-initiated cohort study of patients treated from 28 July 2021 to 3 April 2024. Inclusion criteria were isolate left subclavian artery revascularization for elective or urgent/emergent 'zone 2' TEVAR. The primary outcome was technical success and freedom from ISF TEVAR-related reintervention or endoleak. RESULTS We treated 50 patients: 28 (56.0%) atherosclerotic thoracic aneurysms, 12 (24.0%) type B aortic dissection and 10 (20.0%) penetrating aortic ulcers. Elective intervention was carried out in 46 (92.0%) cases. ISF was successful in all cases, with a procedural primary technical success in 47 (94.0%) cases. The median time of intervention was 184 min (interquartile range 135–220) with a median fenestration time of 20 min (interquartile range 13–35). Operative mortality did not occur. We observed 1 case of spinal cord ischaemia and 2 cases of bilateral posterior non-disabling stroke. Mortality at 30 days occurred in 1 (2.0%) patient (not aorta-related). The median follow-up was 4 months (interquartile range 1–12.25). Bridging stent graft patency was 100% with no ISF-related endoleak. ISF-related reintervention was never required CONCLUSIONS ISF TEVAR using the Ankura™-II device with the self-centring adjustable needle system showed high technical success, promising stability and stable aortic-related outcomes. Owing to these results, it represents a safe and effective alternative for standard 'zone 2' TEVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the midterm and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedure to treat an uncomplicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection (uATBAD) with high risk for subsequent aortic complications compared with the group of patients who received a conservative treatment protocol during the same period. Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2019, 35 patients who had TEVAR due to uATBAD and those with conservative procedure (n=18) were included in a retrospective analysis and follow-up study. The primary endpoints were false lumen thrombosis/perfusion, true lumen diameter, and aortic dilatation. The aortic-related mortality, reintervention, and long-term survival were the secondary endpoints. Results: In the study period, 53 patients (22 females) with a mean age of 61.1±13 years were included. No 30-day and in-hospital mortality was recorded. Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 2 patients (5.7%). In the TEVAR group (n=35) and in a median follow-up period of 34 months, a significant reduction of maximum aortic and false lumen diameter as well as a significant increase of true lumen diameter were detected (p<0.001 each). Complete false lumen thrombosis increased from 6% preoperatively to 60% at follow-up. The median difference in aortic, false lumen, and true lumen diameter was −5 mm (interquartile range [IQR]=−28 to 8 mm), –11 mm (IQR=−53 to 10 mm), and 7 mm (IQR=−13 to 17 mm), respectively. In 3 patients (8.6%), a reintervention was needed. Two patients (1 aortic-related) died during follow-up. The estimated survival according to Kaplan-Meyer analysis was 94.1% after 3 years and 87.5% after 5 years. Similar to the TEVAR group, no 30-day or in-hospital mortality was recorded in the conservative group. During follow-up, 2 patients died and 5 patients underwent conversion-TEVAR (28%). In a median follow-up period of 26 months (range=150), a significant increase of maximum aortic diameter (p=0.006) and a tendency to augmentation of the false lumen (p=0.06) were noted. No significant reduction of the true lumen was seen. Conclusions: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients at high risk of subsequent aortic complications in uncomplicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection is safe and is associated with favorable midterm outcomes regarding aortic remodeling. Clinical Impact: In a retrospective, single center analysis of prospectively collected data with follow-up, we compared 35 patients with high-risk features who recieved TEVAR in acute and sub-acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection to a control-group (n=18). The TEVAR group showed a significant positive remoduling (reduction of max. aortic and false lumen diameter and increase of true lumen diameter (p<0.001 each)) during follow-up with an estimated survival of 94.1% after 3 years and 87.5% after 5 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization has been used in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone (PLZ). The outcomes of comparisons between TEVAR and hybrid procedure on patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, are rarely reported. This study sought to compare and clarify the early and midterm outcomes between TEVAR and hybrid procedure in patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ. Materials and Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2021, 93 patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, who underwent TEVAR or hybrid procedure, were retrospectively evaluated in Beijing Anzhen hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative imaging features, periprocedural details, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan–Meier method. Results: TEVAR procedures were performed on 41 patients (TEVAR group) and hybrid procedures on 52 patients (hybrid group). Early events, 30 day mortality, and all-cause mortality, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, patients receiving TEVAR had significantly shorter procedure time (p<0.001), hospital stay (p<0.001), and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p=0.001) compared with those in the hybrid group. Patients receiving TEVAR had significantly lower midterm events (p=0.014) and re-intervention (p=0.015) compared with those in the hybrid group. Conclusion: The study indicated that TEVAR with LSA revascularization for TBAD with inadequate PLZ is associated with a trend toward lower rates of midterm events, while the early and midterm mortalities were comparable with those in hybrid procedure. Clinical Impact: This study is novel as it compared the outcomes between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and hybrid procedure in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone, which has been rarely reported previously. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it is clinically relevant as it demonstrated that TEVAR with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization for TBAD with inadequate proximal landing zone is associated with a trend toward lower rates of mid-term events, while the early and mid-term mortalities were comparable with those in the hybrid procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs), limited data support tubular thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as a viable treatment option. For treatment of more proximal PAUs, hybrid approaches and—more recently—scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) have been advocated. Outcomes of scTEVAR specifically for PAUs have not yet been reported. This study reports long-term outcomes for tubular and scTEVAR in PAUs and compares the safety profile in both cohorts regarding the significantly more proximal landing zone (LZ) for scTEVAR. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study includes all nonacute patients treated for complicated PAU with scTEVAR and tubular TEVAR. Patient and PAU characteristics as well as procedural success, complication and reintervention rates, and all-cause and aortic mortality were analyzed. Results: Of 212 TEVAR procedures reviewed, 21 patients with tubular TEVAR and 19 patients with scTEVAR were included. Patient and PAU characteristics were similar, and LZ was significantly more proximal in the scTEVAR cohort (p=0.0001), with similar number and types of supra-aortic revascularization procedures. Clinical success was reached in all 40 patients (100%), and reintervention rate was 2/21 (9.5%) and 1/19 (5.3%), respectively. Over the mean follow-up of 63 (TEVAR) and 53 (scTEVAR) months, clinical success was stable in all patients with one (abdominal) aortic-related mortality in the scTEVAR cohort. Conclusion: Treatment of complicated PAUs with TEVAR as well as scTEVAR provides excellent and similar clinical success, stability of clinical success, and aortic survival with acceptable complication and reintervention rates. Scalloped TEVAR safely lengthens the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies. Clinical Impact: Treatment of asymptomatic complicated penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) provides excellent clinical success and acceptable complication and reintervention rates. More patients become amenable to endovascular treatment by including scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) as a means to safely lengthen the proximal sealing zone to address more proximal pathologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe snare-assisted vessel targeting to selectively overcome a dissection in the iliac bifurcation and gain antegrade access to the hypogastric artery (HA). Technique: The technique is demonstrated in a 64-year-old woman with an asymptomatic Crawford type III thoracoabdominal aneurysm. A 2-stage endovascular repair, consisting of a thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and a branched endovascular aortic repair was planned. In the control angiography after TEVAR, a disrupted plaque with consequent dissection in the right iliac bifurcation was detected. The perfusion of the common iliac artery and external iliac artery resulted impaired. The targeting of the right HA through a contralateral antegrade approach failed, whereas an ipsilateral retrograde approach was possible but unsuitable for therapeutic purposes. Using the catheter of the retrograde ipsilateral access, a snare from a contralateral crossover was cached and dragged into the HA, allowing the targeting of the vessels and further endovascular therapy with angioplasty and stenting. Follow-up 8 months postoperatively demonstrated the patency of the stents and well-preserved perfusion in the right iliac bifurcation. Conclusion: The snare-dragging technique can be used to gain access to vessels presenting challenging conformations or dissections. This application may be a valuable support for complex endovascular treatment in a variety of patients. Clinical Impact: The snare-dragging technique can be used to gain access to vessels presenting challenging conformations or dissections. It allows the catheterization to be establish from the easiest and safest approach and then "transferred" from one access to the other. It avoids the risk of repeated loss of catheterization due to unstable and unfavorable working angles, and it saves time and radiation. It permits different material combinations, adapting to the available resources and materials. We believe that the current technique may increase the strategy spectrum available for endovascular therapy and complex endovascular procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]