1. Sex Differences in Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Open Thoracotomy.
- Author
-
Roca G, Sabate S, Serrano A, Benito MC, Pérez M, Revuelta M, Lorenzo A, Busquets J, Rodríguez G, Sanz D, Jiménez A, Parera A, de la Gala F, and Montes A
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Aged, Sex Characteristics, Adult, Pain Measurement methods, Pain Measurement trends, Sex Factors, Incidence, Thoracotomy adverse effects, Thoracotomy trends, Pain, Postoperative epidemiology, Pain, Postoperative etiology, Pain, Postoperative diagnosis, Pain, Postoperative psychology, Chronic Pain epidemiology, Chronic Pain etiology
- Abstract
Study Objective: To determine the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in women after open thoracotomy. Secondary objectives were to compare relevant patient and procedural variables between women and men., Design: Observational cohort study., Setting: Ten university-affiliated hospitals., Subjects: Ninety-six women and 137 men., Interventions: Scheduled open thoracotomy., Measurements: Pain histories, psychological measures, and perceived health status and catastrophizing scores were obtained. The diagnosis of chronic postsurgical pain was by physical examination at 4 months. Standard preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were also recorded., Main Results: The chronic postsurgical pain incidence was significantly higher in women (53.1%) than in men (38.0%) (p = 0.023). At baseline, women had significantly worse scores on psychological measures (perception of mental state [p = 0.01], depression [p = 0.006], and catastrophizing [p < 0.001]). Women also reported more preoperative pain in the operative area (p = 0.011) and other areas (p = 0.030)., Conclusion: These findings show that the incidence of physician-diagnosed chronic postsurgical pain is higher in women than in men after surgeries involving thoracotomy. Sex and gender should be included in future clinical research on pain in surgical settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests: A.M.P. reports financial support, administrative support, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Carlos III Institute of Health. A.M.P. reports a relationship with Carlos III Institute of Health that includes funding grants. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF