Search

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke, considering their diabetes history and admission hyperglycemia status., Methods and Results: This was a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 (Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-2) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients in China between June 2021 and May 2022. Eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke for standard intravenous thrombolysis, but ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned (1:1) to tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as plasma glucose >7.8 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcome were excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, respectively. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ 2 test was used for the outcomes. Of the 1382 patients included, 369 (26.7%) had a history of diabetes, and 482 (34.9%) experienced admission hyperglycemia. The primary efficacy outcome, comparing tenecteplase to alteplase, was achieved in 93 (56.7%) versus 97 (48.3%) among patients with a history of diabetes ( P =0.11) and 335 (64.6%) versus 300 (62.2%) among those without diabetes ( P =0.45), respectively. The primary efficacy outcome for tenecteplase versus alteplase was comparable among patients with and without admission hyperglycemia (57.5% versus 53.9%, P  = 0.44; 65.4% versus 60.4%, P =0.12, respectively). No significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours was observed between tenecteplase and alteplase, regardless of diabetes history or admission hyperglycemia., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that intravenous tenecteplase exhibits similar clinical outcomes compared with alteplase, irrespective of the patient's glucose metabolism status., Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04797013.

Although anticoagulation remains the cornerstone treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), catheter-directed therapy (CDT) has generated great interest as an adjunctive option for those presenting with hemodynamic decompensation or high risk for deterioration and in whom systemic thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. However, randomized controlled data supporting the efficacy and safety of CDT in addition to antithrombotic therapy in patients with high-risk and intermediate- to high-risk PE compared with anticoagulation and systemic thrombolysis alone are lacking. This paucity of high-quality data hampers guideline recommendations regarding the optimal therapeutic approach in such patients with PE. The aim of the present paper is to critically appraise the current evidence for CDT in patients with high-risk and intermediate- to high-risk PE and to highlight major areas of innovation in the recent literature. In addition, the authors describe unmet clinical and research needs, potential strategies to resolve these knowledge gaps, and pathways for device selection., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Piazza has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Janssen, Alexion, Bayer, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Esperion, and 1R01HL164717-01; and is an adviser to Boston Scientific, Amgen, BCRI, PERC, NAMSA, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Regeneron. Dr Sharp is a consultant to Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Philips, Penumbra, and Recor Medical; and has stock options with Althea Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Limited data exist on the safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab pretreatment in patients with AIS receiving IVT., Methods: A national registry-based study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific subgroup. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and case series, aiming to document the pooled rates of (1) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (2) any intracranial hemorrhage, (3) 3-month mortality, and (4) the proportion of excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-1) and (5) good (mRS scores 0-2) functional outcome at 3 months among patients with AIS, who received IVT after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. Moreover, we sought to compare these outcomes between IVT-treated patients after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and IVT-treated patients without dabigatran pretreatment., Results: Thirteen cohorts including our nation-wide registry-based cohort and 1 case series comprising 553 patients with AIS (mean age: 75 years; male sex: 65%; median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score: 11 points) receiving idarucizumab before IVT were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of sICH after IVT after idarucizumab administration was 4% (95% CI 1-9; I 2 = 26%), while the pooled rates of any intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality were 10% (95% CI 5-16; I 2 = 24%) and 18% (95% CI 10-27; I 2 = 0%), respectively. The pooled rates of excellent and good functional outcomes at 3 months were 56% (95% CI 27-83; I 2 = 69%) and 70% (95% CI 57-81; I 2 = 40%), respectively. The risk of sICH (risk ratio [RR] 1.86; 95% CI 0.91-3.80; I 2 = 0%), any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.11; I 2 = 8%), and 3-month mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.91-2.48; I 2 = 0%) did not differ between patients with AIS receiving IVT with and without idarucizumab. Moreover, idarucizumab administration was associated with higher likelihood of achieving a 3-month good functional outcome (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11-1.65; I 2 = 27%)., Discussion: IVT for AIS after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seems to be safe and effective in observational studies with limited number of patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are warranted to provide robust evidence on the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific AIS subgroup.

In recent years the diagnostics of pulmonary artery embolisms (PE) has gained significance, with confirmation occurring in only about 15-25 % of suspected cases. Despite technological advances, radiological methods remain problematic due to radiation and contrast medium exposure. Clinical scores play a crucial role in the risk assessment of PE. High-risk situations call for specific measures, while negative D‑dimers can help avoid overdiagnosis. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) remains the gold standard with high sensitivity and specificity. Treatment requires an interdisciplinary team (pulmonary embolism response team, PERT). Anticoagulation is an option for stable patients, while in unstable or unsuccessful courses, thrombolysis or interventional procedures can be considered. Side effects, especially the risk of bleeding, need to be considered for both forms of treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objectives: As indications for acute ischemic stroke treatment expand, it is unclear whether disparities in treatment utilization and outcome still exist. The main objective of this study was to investigate disparities in acute ischemic stroke treatment and determine impact on outcome., Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive ischemic stroke admissions to a comprehensive stroke center from 2012-2021 was performed. Primary exposure was intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy. Primary end points were discharge modified Rankin Scale, home disposition, and expired/hospice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to elucidate disparities in treatment utilization and determine impact on outcome., Results: Of 517,615 inpatient visits, there were 7,540 (1.46 %) ischemic stroke admissions, increasing from 1.14 % to 1.79 % from 2012-2021. Intravenous thrombolysis significantly decreased from 14.4 % to 9.8 % while endovascular thrombectomy significantly increased from 0.8 % to 10.5 %. Both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy increased odds of discharge home and modified Rankin Scale 0-2, and thrombectomy decreased odds of expired/hospice. After adjusting for covariates, decreased odds of thrombectomy was associated with Medicaid insurance (Odds Ratio [95 % Confidence Interval] 0.55 [0.32-0.93]), age 80+ (0.49 [0.35-0.69]), prior stroke (0.49 [0.31-0.77]), and diabetes mellitus (0.55 [0.39-0.79]), while low median household income (<$80,000/year) increased odds of no acute treatment (1.34 [1.16-1.56]). No sex or racial disparities were observed. Medicaid and low-income were not associated with worse clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Less endovascular thrombectomy occurred in Medicaid, older, prior stroke, and diabetic patients, while low-income was associated with no treatment. The observed socioeconomic disparities did not impact discharge outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Katz, Dr. Wang, and Dr. Sanmartin received grants from Siemens Healthineers during the conduct of the study. Dr. Katz is a paid consultant for Xcath, Inc., and speaker for Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Sanelli received research grants from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute and Siemens Healthineers during the conduct of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (SGVOP) is a means of acquiring hemodynamic data non-invasively, unlike other methods used routinely for the diagnosis and follow-up of venous diseases. The present study compares the plethysmographic data with early- and mid-term routine data of patients with acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis., Patients and Method: Included in this retrospective study were 118 patients with acute DVT, who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis between February 2018 and July 2019. Pre- and post-procedure follow-up data including CIVIQ-20 (quality of life), VCSS (Venous Clinical Severity Score), D-Dimer, Doppler USG results, venous capacity (VC), and venous outflow (VO) obtained by SGVOP were recorded and compared., Results: In all 118 (100%) patients who underwent the procedure, early- and mid-term patency was seen to have been provided on Doppler USG follow-up, and various degrees of venous insufficiency were identified. A statistically significant improvement was observed in VCSS, CIVIQ-20, D-Dimer, VO, and VC measurements, although when the discrepancies between CIVIQ-20 and plethysmographic measurements were examined individually during the 6-month follow-up, nine (13.1%) patients were identified with comorbidities., Conclusions: Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is an effective treatment approach for patients with acute DVT. Providing non-invasive objective data supporting the diagnosis and follow-up of venous diseases, the SGVOP approach offers significant benefits and should be considered more frequently as a viable therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Standard treatment for eligible patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activators alteplase or tenecteplase. Current guidelines recommend monitoring patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) for 24 h after thrombolytic therapy. However, recent studies have questioned the need for prolonged ICU monitoring. This retrospective cohort study aims to identify potential candidates for early transition to a lower level of care by assessing risk factors for neurological deterioration, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or need for ICU intervention within 24 h post-thrombolysis., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients 18 years and older with AIS who received thrombolysis. Patients were excluded if they were transferred to another facility, if they were transitioned to comfort care or hospice care within 24 h, or if they lacked imaging and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score data. The primary end point was incidence of sICH between 0-12 and 12-24 h. Secondary end points included the need for ICU intervention and rates of neurological deterioration., Results: The analysis included 204 patients who received the full dose of alteplase. Among them, ten patients (4.9%) developed sICH, with the majority (n = 7) occurring within 12 h post-thrombolysis. Sixty-two patients required ICU interventions within 12 h compared with four patients after 12 h. Twenty-four patients had neurological deterioration within 12 h, and seven patients had neurological deterioration after 12 h. Multivariable analysis identified mechanical thrombectomy and increased blood pressure at presentation as predictors of ICU need beyond 12 h post-thrombolysis., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that sICH, neurological deterioration, and need for ICU intervention rarely occur beyond 12 h after thrombolytic administration. Patients presenting with blood pressures < 140/90 mm Hg, NIHSS scores < 10, and not undergoing mechanical thrombectomy may be best candidates for early de-escalation. Larger prospective studies are needed to more fully evaluate the safety, feasibility, and financial impact of early transition out of the ICU., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Objective: This study aimed to externally validate different predictive scores for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), with a particular focus on their predictive abilities in Asian stroke patients., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled stroke patients who received a standard dose of alteplase within 4.5 hours from symptom onset at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2010 to August 2023. SICH was defined as the hemorrhagic transformation detected on the head CT scan completed within 48 h post-IVT, accompanied by a clinical deterioration of at least a 4-point increase in NIHSS score. Predictive abilities of the HAT, MSS, SEDAN, SPAN-100, and GRASPS scores were tested. Discrimination and calibration were performed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), DeLong test, and Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test., Results: The study included 1007 stroke patients, of whom 31 (3.08 %) developed SICH. ROC-AUCs for predicting SICH were: 0.796 (95 %CI: 0.726-0.866) for the GRASPS score, 0.724 (95 %CI: 0.644-0.804) for the MSS score, 0.715 (95 %CI: 0.619-0.811) for the SEDAN score, 0.714 (95 %CI: 0.611-0.817) for the HAT score, and 0.605 (95 %CI: 0.491-0.720) for the SPAN-100 score (all P < 0.05). DeLong tests showed that the GRASPS score demonstrated significantly better discrimination than the MSS score (P = 0.010), the SEDAN score (P = 0.009), the HAT score (P = 0.049), and the SPAN-100 score (P = 0.000). H-L tests indicated good calibrations which were ranked HAT > SEDAN > MSS > SPAN-100 > GRASPS scores., Conclusion: The GRASPS score showed reasonable predictive ability for SICH, indicating its potential utility for Asian stroke patients receiving IVT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is one of the main treatments for acute limb ischaemia. Urokinase is still a widely used thrombolytic drug in some regions. However, there needs to be a clear consensus on the protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis using urokinase for acute lower limb ischaemia., Methods: A single-centre protocol of continuous catheter-directed thrombolysis with low-dose urokinase (20,000 IU/hour) lasting 48-72 h for acute lower limb ischaemia was proposed based on our previous experiences. A retrospective study from June 2016 to December 2020 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol. The target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were also monitored during follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for the subgroup analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for reinterventions and death., Results: 90 lower limbs were involved, including 51 Rutherford Grade I, 35 Grade IIa and four Grade IIb. During a 60.8-h thrombolysis, 86 cases (95.5%) were considered effective according to the angiogram. No major bleeding complication occurred during thrombolysis, and one amputation occurred after. Freedom from target lesion revascularisation, amputation and death were 75.6%, 94.4% and 91.1% during a mean 27.5-month follow-up, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier estimator, aortoiliac lesions had lower reintervention rates than femoropopliteal lesions (Log-rank p = 0.010), and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had a lower reintervention rate (Log-rank p = 0.049). Age was an independent risk factor for death ( p = 0.038, hazard ratio 1.076, 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.153)., Conclusions: The single-centre protocol of catheter-directed thrombolysis we proposed for acute lower limb ischaemia was effective and safe. Strict blood pressure control during catheter-directed thrombolysis ensured safety. Aortoiliac lesions and cases without narrowing atheromatous plaque had lower reintervention rates during follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Meteorological factors can increase stroke risk; however, their impact is not precisely understood. Heat waves during summer increase total mortality. Therefore, we hypothesized that the average daily temperature in summer may correlate with the incidence of thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke in Budapest and Pest County, Hungary., Methods: We analyzed the relationship between the average daily temperature in summer months and the daily number of thrombolytic treatments (TT) performed with the indication of acute ischemic stroke between 1st June and 31st August each year from 2007 to 2016. The analysis was also performed after the omission of the data of the last day of the months due to possible psychosocial impact reported in our previous study. Spearman's correlation was used for statistical analysis., Results: No significant correlation was found between the average summer daily temperature and the number of TT in the entire sample of the 10-year period. When omitting the data of the last day of each month, positive correlations were suspected in 2014 (r=0.225, P=0.034) and 2015 (r=0.276, P=0.009)., Conclusion: Our findings did not confirm an association between the average daily temperature in summer and the daily number of TT throughout the examined 10-year period. However, importantly, in 2014 and 2015, the years with the highest average daily temperatures in this period, a positive correlation was found. The level of correlation is modest, indicating that risk factors, both meteorological and non-meteorological, other than the average temperature, play equally important roles in determining the incidence of thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke on the population level., (Copyright © 2023 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Minor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke., Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days., Results: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence., Conclusions: Dual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) have an unclear benefit in those with pre-stroke dementia or cognitive impairment, as these patients were often excluded from landmark stroke trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of IVT and EVT in these populations., Aims: Our systematic review, conforming to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, investigated studies on acute ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke dementia or cognitive impairment treated with IVT or EVT. Primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and radiographic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)., Summary of Review: Nine articles were identified, with five observational studies of IVT use in patients with (n = 1078) and without dementia (n = 2805) being selected for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in favorable outcome (adjusted OR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.24-1.59), mortality (unadjusted OR: 1.19, 95% CI 0.86-1.64), ICH (unadjusted OR: 1.32, 95% CI 0.79-2.19), and symptomatic ICH (unadjusted OR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.70-1.25) for patients undergoing IVT with pre-stroke dementia versus those without. One EVT study (n = 615 with dementia vs n = 9600 without) found no significant differences in outcomes apart from an increased odds of ICH for those with pre-existing dementia (adjusted OR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.40). A pooled analysis of three IVT studies showed no significant association of cognitive impairment (n = 93 vs n = 211 without) with all assessed outcomes, whereas a study of EVT found that pre-stroke cognitive impairment was associated with poor 90-day outcomes (mRS 3-6)., Conclusion: These results suggest no substantial safety issues in the use of IVT or EVT for patients with pre-existing dementia or cognitive impairment compared to those without. However, the efficacy of these therapies in this demographic remains uncertain. Further rigorous studies that include a more nuanced outcome measurement approach are warranted., Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42021240499., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: W.B., F.B., and B.B report no disclosures. J.S.M. reports research grants with GE Healthcare independent of the current study and is the scientific advisor and consultant for GE Healthcare independent of the current study. Dr A.G. reports membership in the editorial boards of Stroke, Neurology, and Neurology Clinical Practice; consulting fees and honoraria from Atheneum, AlphaSights, MD Analytics, Figure 1, My Medical Panel, Creative Research Designs, CTC Communications Corp, Alexion, Biogen, and Servier Canada; research support from Alberta Innovates, Campus Alberta Neuroscience, Brain Canada, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Panmure House, the Government of Canada INOVAIT and New Frontiers in Research programs, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; stock/stock options from SnapDx; and a patent application for a system for patient monitoring and cuff-based therapies—all outside the scope of the published work.

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) are currently considered best practices in acute stroke patients. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting as regards haemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and functional outcome. This study sought to investigate for any differences, in terms of safety and effectiveness, between AF patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) treated and untreated with reperfusion therapies., Methods: Data from two multicenter cohort studies (RAF and RAF-NOACs) on consecutive patients with AF and AIS were analyzed to compare patients treated and not treated with reperfusion therapies (IVT and/or EVT). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome events: 90-day good functional outcome and mortality. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared treated and untreated patients., Results: Overall, 441 (25.4%) were included in the reperfusion-treated group and 1,295 (74.6%) in the untreated group. The multivariable model suggested that reperfusion therapies were significantly associated with good functional outcome. Rates of mortality and disability were higher in patients not treated, especially in the case of higher NIHSS scores. In the PSM comparison, 173/250 patients (69.2%) who had received reperfusion therapies had good functional outcome at 90 days, compared to 146/250 (58.4%) untreated patients (p = 0.009, OR: 1.60, 95% CI:1.11-2.31)., Conclusions: Patients with AF and AIS treated with reperfusion therapies had a significantly higher rate of good functional outcome and lower rates of mortality compared to those patients with AF and AIS who had undergone conservative treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: When treating acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, both mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous (IV) thrombolysis carry the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage., Purpose: This study aimed to delve deeper into the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and its subtypes associated with mechanical thrombectomy with or without IV thrombolysis to contribute to better decision-making in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion., Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies from inception to September 6, 2023., Study Selection: The eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials or post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials that focused on patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation. After screening 4870 retrieved records, we included 9 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 3 post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials) with 3241 patients., Data Analysis: The interventions compared were mechanical thrombectomy + IV thrombolysis versus mechanical thrombectomy alone, with the outcome of interest being any form of intracerebral hemorrhage and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intervention. A common definition for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was pooled from various classification systems, and subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of different definitions and anatomic descriptions of hemorrhage. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised version of Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model., Data Synthesis: Eight studies had some concerns, and 1 study was considered high risk. Overall, the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was comparable between mechanical thrombectomy + IV thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy alone (risk ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.89-1.72]; P = .20), with no heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analysis of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage showed a non-significant difference between 2 groups based on the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke ( P = .3), the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification ( P = .5), the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study ( P = .4), and the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III ( P = .7) criteria. Subgroup analysis of different anatomic descriptions of intracerebral hemorrhage showed no difference between the 2 groups. Also, we found no difference in the risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage between two groups (risk ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.00-1.21]; P = .052) with no heterogeneity across studies., Limitations: There was a potential for performance bias in most studies., Conclusions: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, including its various classifications and anatomic descriptions, was comparable between mechanical thrombectomy + IV thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy alone., (© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is a standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of combining intravenous thrombolysis with argatroban (an anticoagulant agent) or eptifibatide (an antiplatelet agent) are unclear., Methods: We conducted a phase 3, three-group, adaptive, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 57 sites in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had received intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset were assigned to receive intravenous argatroban, eptifibatide, or placebo within 75 minutes after the initiation of thrombolysis. The primary efficacy outcome, the utility-weighted 90-day modified Rankin scale score (range, 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes), was assessed by means of centralized adjudication. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after randomization., Results: A total of 514 patients were assigned to receive argatroban (59 patients), eptifibatide (227 patients), or placebo (228 patients). All the patients received intravenous thrombolysis (70% received alteplase, and 30% received tenecteplase), and 225 patients (44%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy. At 90 days, the mean (±SD) utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores were 5.2±3.7 with argatroban, 6.3±3.2 with eptifibatide, and 6.8±3.0 with placebo. The posterior probability that argatroban was better than placebo was 0.002 (posterior mean difference in utility-weighted modified Rankin scale score, -1.51±0.51) and that eptifibatide was better than placebo was 0.041 (posterior mean difference, -0.50±0.29). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in the three groups (4% with argatroban, 3% with eptifibatide, and 2% with placebo). Mortality at 90 days was higher in the argatroban group (24%) and the eptifibatide group (12%) than in the placebo group (8%)., Conclusions: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset, adjunctive treatment with intravenous argatroban or eptifibatide did not reduce poststroke disability and was associated with increased mortality. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MOST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03735979.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been demonstrated to be effective for patients with tandem occlusion. The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before EVT in patients with tandem occlusion remain debatable., Methods and Results: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2023. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the successful recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality at 90 days. In total, 9 studies with 1838 enrolled participants were identified. Our results showed that, compared with treatment with EVT alone, intravenous thrombolysis before EVT was associated with a greater proportion of functional independence at 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.14-1.69]; P =0.001), a greater rate of successful recanalization (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.11-1.89]; P =0.007) and decreased mortality (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.93]; P =0.02). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the intravenous thrombolysis plus EVT group and the EVT alone group (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.79-1.70]; P =0.45)., Conclusions: In patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem occlusion, intravenous thrombolysis before EVT was associated with a greater rate of favorable functional outcomes and successful recanalization and a lower mortality rate without an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage compared with patients receiving EVT alone.

Aims: Alteplase is a cornerstone thrombolytic agent in clinical practice but presents a potential bleeding risk. Stroke patients need pre-screening to exclude haemorrhagic stroke before using alteplase. In this study, we develop a new thrombolytic agent citPA5, characterized by an enhanced safety profile and minimal bleeding tendency., Methods and Results: A clot lysis agent, named citPA5, is developed based on rtPA with point mutations to completely suppress its proteolytic activity in the absence of fibrin. In the presence of fibrin, citPA5 exhibited significantly higher fibrinolytic activity (a 15.8-fold increase of kcat/Km). Furthermore, citPA5 showed resistance to endogenous fibrinolysis inhibitor, PAI-1, resulting in enhanced potency. In a series of safety evaluation experiments, including thrombelastography assay, mice tail bleeding assay, and a murine intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) model, citPA5 did not cause systemic bleeding or worsen ICH compared with alteplase. This highlights the low risk of bleeding associated with citPA5. Finally, we found that citPA5 effectively improved cerebral blood flow and reduced infarct volume in a carotid embolism-induced stroke model., Conclusion: This clot lysis agent, citPA5, not only exhibits a low risk of bleeding but also demonstrates highly effective thrombolysis capabilities. As a result, citPA5 shows great potential for administration prior to the classification of stroke types, making it possible for use in ambulances at the onset of stroke when symptoms are identified. The findings presented in this study also suggest that this strategy could be applied to develop a new generation of fibrinolytic drugs that offer greater safety and specificity in targeting fibrin., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: H.M.M.v.B., M.W., D.W.J.D. reports unrestricted grants for research from Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and Thrombolytic Science, outside the submitted work, paid to Institution. .

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a critical condition requiring effective management strategies. Several options are available, including thrombolytic therapy and anticoagulants., Objectives: To assess the impact of thrombolytic therapy either combined with anticoagulant (AC) or alone versus AC alone on mortality, recurrence, clinical deterioration, bleeding, and hospital stay., Method: This study included 25 previously published studies from 1990 to 2023, with a total of 12 836 participants. Dichotomous and continuous analysis models were used to evaluate outcomes, with heterogeneity and publication bias tests applied. A random model was used for data analysis. Several databases were searched for the identification and inclusion of studies, such as Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase., Results: For sub-massive PE, CDT plus AC significantly reduced in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month mortality compared to AC alone, odds ratio (OR) of -0.99 (95% CI [-1.32 to -0.66]), with increased major bleeding risk but no difference in minor bleeding or hospital stay, OR = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.03 to 0.96]). For acute intermediate PE, systemic thrombolytic therapy did not affect all-cause or in-hospital mortality but increased minor bleeding, reduced recurrent PE, and prevented clinical deterioration. The heterogeneity of different models in the current study varied from 0% to 37.9%., Conclusion: The addition of CDT to AC improves mortality outcomes for sub-massive PE but raises the risk of major bleeding. Systemic thrombolytic therapy reduces recurrence and clinical decline in acute intermediate PE despite increasing minor bleeding. Individualized patient assessment is essential for optimizing PE management strategies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Intravenous thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) remains the primary treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the mechanism of tPA-related hemorrhagic transformation (HT) remains poorly understood. Elevation of histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) expression was detected by nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry at 1 h following tPA infusion as compared to baseline prior to tPA infusion (discovery cohort, n = 10), which was subsequently confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 157) by ELISA. Surprisingly, no elevation of HRG was detected in individuals who subsequently developed HT. During in vitro experiments, HRG reduced neutrophil NETosis, inflammatory cytokine production, and migration across the blood-brain barrier induced by tPA. In a photothrombotic murine AIS model, HRG administration ameliorated HT with delayed thrombolysis, by inhibiting neutrophil immune infiltration and downregulating pro-inflammatory signaling pathways. Neutrophil depletion or NETosis inhibition also alleviated HT, whereas HRG siRNA treatment exacerbated HT. In conclusion, fluctuations in HRG levels may reflect tPA therapy and its associated HT. The inhibitory effect of HRG on neutrophils may counteract tPA-induced immune abnormalities and HT in patients with AIS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: We evaluated the impact of completion intraoperative venography on clinical outcomes for axillosubclavian vein (AxSCV) thrombosis owing to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS)., Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center review of all patients with vTOS treated with first rib resection (FRR) and intraoperative venography from 2011 to 2023. We reviewed intraoperative venographic films to classify findings and collected demographics, clinical and perioperative variables, and clinical outcomes. Primary end points were symptomatic relief and primary patency at 3 months and 1 year. Secondary end points were time free from symptoms, reintervention rate, perioperative complications, and mortality., Results: Fifty-one AxSCVs (49 patients; mean age, 31.3 ± 12.6 years; 52.9% female) were treated for vTOS with FRR and external venolysis followed by completion intraoperative venography with a mean follow up of 15.5 ± 13.5 months. Before FRR, 32 underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis (62.7%). Completion intraoperative venography identified 16 patients with no stenosis (group 1, 31.3%), 17 with no stenosis after angioplasty (group 2, 33.3%), 10 with residual stenosis after angioplasty (group 3, 19.7%), and 8 with complete occlusion (group 4, 15.7%). The overall symptomatic relief was 44 of 51 (86.3%) and did not differ between venographic classifications (group 1, 14 of 16; group 2, 13 of 17; group 3, 10 of 10; and group 4, 7 of 8; log-rank test, P = .5). The overall 3-month and 1-year primary patency was 42 of 43 (97.7%) and 32 of 33 (97.0%), respectively (group 1, 16 of 16 and 9 of 9; group 2, 16 of 17 and 12 of 13; group 3, 10 of 10, 5 of 5; group 4, primary patency not obtained). There was one asymptomatic rethrombosis that resolved with anticoagulation, and three patients underwent reintervention with venous angioplasty for significant symptom recurrence an average 2.89 ± 1.7 months after FRR., Conclusions: Our single-center retrospective study demonstrates that FRR with completion intraoperative venography has excellent symptomatic relief and short- and mid-term patency despite residual venous stenosis and complete occlusion. Although completion intraoperative venographic classification did not correlate with adverse outcomes, this protocol yielded excellent results and provides important clinical data for postoperative management. Our results also support a conservative approach to AxSCV occlusion identified after FRR., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the safety of administering low-dose aspirin (81 mg) 18 hours after intravenous thrombolytic therapy., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort investigation. Individuals received either alteplase or tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke followed by aspirin 81 mg (after follow-up imaging). An institutional change moved follow-up post-thrombolytic CT scans to 18 hours, and qualifying patients were grouped based on whether they received aspirin ≤24 hours or >24 hours. Chart reviews were conducted to assess the primary outcome of new or worsening intracranial hemorrhage, as well as secondary outcomes of change in stroke scale scores at discharge and 3 months, lengths of stay, favorable outcomes at 3 months, hospital readmission, and mortality., Results: Out of 350 patients screened, 130 qualified for inclusion-50 of whom received aspirin ≤24 hours (mean 21.1 hours, SD±6.2), and 80 who received aspirin >24 hours (mean 34 hours, SD±8.2). Only 1 new intracranial bleed occurred following aspirin administration in the >24-hour group. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the secondary outcomes, although there was higher mortality (3/50 vs. 2/80, P =0.372) and shorter hospital length of stay (median difference -1.0 day, P =0.0336) in the <24 hours group., Conclusions: Low-dose aspirin administration sooner than 24 hours following thrombolytic therapy did not increase bleeding events. Sooner aspirin administration after ischemic stroke can potentially enhance the prevention of secondary embolization and did not demonstrate worse clinical outcomes; however, further randomized controlled trials are needed., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Thrombolysis treatment for patients with mild stroke is controversial. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and influencing factors of early neurological deterioration (END) in this group of patients., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in Wenzhou Central Hospital. Subgroup analyses were performed for the mild stroke group and nonmild stroke group, END group, and non-early neurological deterioration group in mild stroke patients, respectively., Results: A total of 498 patients were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the mild stroke group was younger age, less atrial fibrillation, previous history of stroke and less use of antithrombotic drugs, more dyslipidemia, smoking, and drinking. Small artery occlusion type was more common in mild stroke, cardioembolism and stroke of undetermined etiology type were less. In the mild stroke group, the symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rate was 2.54%, and the END rate was 16.1%. Predictors of END included systolic blood pressure, blood glucose, cardioembolism subtype, sICH, and large vessel occlusion. In END patients, the sICH rate was 10.53%, and 84.21% of cases started to worsen within 12 hours after IVT. There was no statistically significant difference in the time to exacerbation among different subtypes., Conclusions: The occurrence of mild stroke in young patients was largely related to unhealthy lifestyles. The incidence of END in mild stroke IVT patients was low, with most occurring within 12 hours of IVT. There were many risk factors for END: large vessel occlusion and hyperglycemia were independent risk factors for END after IVT. sICH was an important but rare risk factor for END., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Series detailing complications after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid stenting (tfCAS) for patients presenting with neurologic symptoms that are treated with systemic thrombolysis (ST) are sparse. We sought to determine if treatment with ST was associated with a higher rate of post-carotid intervention complications., Methods: A multispecialty, institutional, prospectively maintained database was queried for symptomatic patients treated with CEA or tfCAS from 2007 to 2019. The primary outcomes of interest were bleeding complications (access/wound complications, hematuria, intracranial hemorrhage) or need for reintervention, stroke, and death. We compared rates of these outcomes between patients who were and were not treated with ST. To adjust for preoperative patient factors and confounding variables, propensity scores for assignment to ST and non-ST were calculated., Results: There were 1,139 patients included (949 [82%] CEA and 190 [17%] tfCAS. All treated lesions were symptomatic (550 [48%] stroke, 603 [52%] transient ischemic attack). Fifty-six patients (5%) were treated with ST. Fifteen of 56 patients also underwent catheter-based intervention for stroke. ST was administered 0 to 1 day preoperatively in 21 (38%) patients, 2 to 6 days preoperatively in 27 (48%) patients, and greater than 6 days preoperatively in 8 (14%) patients. ST patients were more likely to present with stroke (93% vs. 45%; P < 0.001) and have higher preoperative Rankin scores. Unadjusted rate of bleeding/return to operating room was 3% for ST group and 3% for non-ST group (P = 0.60). Unadjusted rate of stroke was 4% for ST group and 3% for the non-ST group (P = 0.91), while perioperative mortality was 5% for ST group and 1% for non-ST group (P = 0.009). After adjusting for patient factors, preoperative antiplatelet/anticoagulation, and operative factors, ST was not associated with an increased odds of perioperative bleeding/return to the operating room (odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.02-1.63; P = 0.309) or stroke (odds ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-2.40; P = 0.493)., Conclusions: ST does not convey a higher risk of complications after CEA or tfCAS. After controlling for other factors, patients that received ST had similar rates of local complications and stroke when compared to non-ST patients. Early carotid intervention is safe in patients that have received ST, and delays should be avoided in symptomatic patients given the high risk of recurrent stroke., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite substantial improvement of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) care with the advent of extended time windows for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a substantial portion of patients still suffer poor outcomes. Additional adjuvant therapies are needed but pharmacologic interactions among therapies may dictate how they could be used. We conducted a survey to determine physician decision-making regarding the use of cytoprotective agents in patients presenting with AIS., Methods: The survey was structured, web-based, anonymous, and invite-only among physicians across the world treating patients presenting with AIS. Respondents were asked about the use of a hypothetical cytoprotective agent (that provided an added 10% benefit) in the context of a treatment interaction with IVT or its timing in relation to IVT., Results: A total of 282 stroke physicians (74.9% males, mean age 46 years) participated in the survey. When the respondent could give both the cytoprotective agent and IVT with no treatment interaction, 177 (78.0%) chose to administer both. In the presence of treatment interaction, 88 (38.3%) would withhold IVT, 83 (36.1%) would withhold the cytoprotective agent and 56 (24.4%) were uncertain. Lastly, 111 (48.9%) were willing to administer the cytoprotective agent if it meant a necessary 10-minute delay in IVT administration., Conclusions: Pharmacologic interactions result in major uncertainty about cytoprotective treatment choices., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have do not have any competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Systemic inflammation impairs outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There is limited knowledge regarding the prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers derived from complete blood count in predicting in-hospital mortality (IHM) in AIS patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Our study aims to compare the predictive performance of various inflammatory biomarkers for predicting IHM in AIS patients., Methods: This retrospective study included AIS patients treated with rt-PA between January 2015 and July 2022. We identified the following inflammatory biomarkers: white blood cell counts (WBCs), absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio, platelet to neutrophil ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, red cell distribution width (RDW), RDW to platelet ratio (RPR), and hemoglobin to RDW (HB/RDW) at admission before rt-PA administration. We assessed the predictive value of these biomarkers for IHM by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The associations between inflammatory biomarkers and IHM were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression (MVLR) analyses., Results: Of 345 AIS patients, IHM occurred in 65 patients (18.84%). HB/RDW and RDW showed better predictive performance compared to other inflammatory biomarkers. In ROC curve analysis, HB/RDW and RDW had an area under ROC of 0.668. HB/RDW outperformed RDW in terms of the positive likelihood ratio (2.733 vs 1.575), accuracy (0.757 vs 0.585), specificity (0.814 vs 0.560), and positive predictive values (0.388 vs 0.267). In MVLR analysis, RDW, RPR, and HB/RDW remained significantly associated with IHM (per 1-unit increases: odds ratios (ORs) = 1.450, 95% CI: [1.178-1.784]; per 1-unit increases: ORs = 1.329, 95% CI [1.103-1.602]; and per 0.1-unit decreases: ORs = 1.412, 95% CI [1.089-1.831], respectively)., Conclusions: The association between HB/RDW and IHM in AIS patients treated with rt-PA was significant. HB/RDW exhibited superior predictive performance compared to other inflammatory biomarkers in predicting IHM., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest with regards to the materials, methods, or findings presented in this study., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To examine the safety and efficacy of ZelanteDVT™ catheter rheolytic thrombectomy in the treatment of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis., Methods: A retrospective analysis method was conducted by means of collecting the data of 32 patients who had completed the treatment of iliac vein stent thrombosis with ZelanteDVT catheter rheolytic thrombectomy from March 2019 to March 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, technical success, clinical success, complications, and early follow-up were analyzed., Results: The technical success rates were 100%, intraoperatively, in which 22 cases were improved to thrombus clearance Grade II (50-90%), 10 were Grade III (>90%). There were 21 cases treated with subsequent catheter-directed thrombolysis, and the average urokinase administration of (120.90 ± 29.63)∗10ˆ4 units. The clinical success rates were 100% and the swelling of the affected limbs were significantly improved, a significant difference in the pre/postoperative between-thigh circumference difference [(5.16 ± 1.08) vs. (1.75 ± 0.84), P < 0.000]. The pre/postoperative Venous Clinical Severity Score was [(12.94 ± 1.70) vs. (7.44 ± 1.31), P < 0.000]. No serious complications occurred during the perioperative period. The postoperative and 12-month stent patency rate was 100.00% (32/32) and 71.88% (23/32), respectively., Conclusions: The ZelanteDVT catheter rheolytic thrombectomy seems to have a promising application prospect for the treatment of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is controversial but may be beneficial if end-of-treatment (EOT) haematoma volume is reduced to ≤15 mL. We explored whether MRI findings of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) modify the effect of MIS on long-term outcomes., Methods: Prespecified blinded subgroup analysis of 288 subjects with qualified imaging sequences from the phase 3 Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for Intracerebral Haemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) trial. We tested for heterogeneity in the effects of MIS and MIS+EOT volume ≤15 mL on the trial's primary outcome of good versus poor function at 1 year by the presence of single CSVD features and CSVD scores using multivariable models., Results: Of 499 patients enrolled in MISTIE III, 288 patients had MRI, 149 (51.7%) randomised to MIS and 139 (48.3%) to standard medical care (SMC). Median (IQR) ICH volume was 42 (30-53) mL. In the full MRI cohort, there was no statistically significant heterogeneity in the effects of MIS versus SMC on 1-year outcomes by any specific CSVD feature or by CSVD scores (all P interaction >0.05). In 94 MIS patients with EOT ICH volume ≤15 mL, significant reduction in odds of poor outcome was found with cerebral amyloid angiopathy score <2 (OR, 0.14 (0.05-0.42); P interaction =0.006), absence of lacunes (OR, 0.37 (0.18-0.80); P interaction =0.02) and absence of severe white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) (OR, 0.22 (0.08-0.58); P interaction =0.03)., Conclusions: Following successful haematoma reduction by MIS, we found significantly lower odds of poor functional outcome with lower total burden of CSVD in addition to absence of lacunes and severe WMHs. CSVD features may have utility for prognostication and patient selection in clinical trials of MIS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Tenecteplase (TNK) was found non-inferior to alteplase in recent clinical trials. We aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of TNK versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS)., Methods: Systematic literature search and a meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials in ischaemic stroke patients with TNK use were conducted. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome which was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days and safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and death at 90 days. We used random-effects model to estimate the pooled risk difference and 95% CI in R package 'Meta'. The included trials were adapted to the non-inferiority analysis with a margin of -4%., Results: Three trials enrolling 4094 patients were identified by systematic search. All trials included AIS patients within 4.5 hours time window. Meta-analysis indicated that 1089 (53.0%) of 2056 patients in the TNK arm and 1016 (50.5%) of 2012 in the alteplase arm had excellent functional outcome at 90 days (0.03 (95% CI -0.00 to 0.06); I 2 =0%), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority threshold. And TNK thrombolysis was not correlated with increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (0.00 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01); I 2 =0%) or death (0.01 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.02); I 2 =0%) at 90 days. The sensitivity analysis with the 0.25 mg/kg trials exclusively showed similar results to the main analysis., Conclusions: TNK was non-inferior to alteplase for achieving excellent functional outcome at 90 days without increasing the safety concern in treating patients with AIS. These findings suggest that TNK can be an alternative to alteplase., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022354342., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: In wake-up stroke, CT-based quantitative net water uptake (NWU) might serve as an alternative tool to MRI to guide intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IVT). An important complication after IVT is symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH). As NWU directly implies ischaemic lesion progression, reflecting blood-brain barrier injury, we hypothesised that NWU predicts sICH in patients who had a ischaemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy with unknown onset., Methods: Consecutive analysis of all patients who had unknown onset anterior circulation ischaemic stroke who underwent CT at baseline and endovascular treatment between December 2016 and October 2020. Quantitative NWU was assessed on baseline CT. The primary endpoint was sICH. The association of NWU and other baseline parameters to sICH was investigated using inverse-probability weighting (IPW) analysis., Results: A total of 88 patients were included, of which 46 patients (52.3%) received IVT. The median NWU was 10.7% (IQR: 5.1-17.7). The proportion of patients with any haemorrhage and sICH were 35.2% and 13.6%. NWU at baseline was significantly higher in patients with sICH (19.1% vs 9.6%, p<0.0001) and the median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was lower (5 vs 8, p<0.0001). Following IPW, there was no association between IVT and sICH in unadjusted analysis. However, after adjusting for ASPECTS and NWU, there was a significant association between IVT administration and sICH (14.6%, 95% CI: 3.3% to 25.6%, p<0.01)., Conclusion: In patients with ischaemic stroke with unknown onset, the combination of high NWU with IVT is directly linked to higher rates of sICH. Besides ASPECTS for evaluating the extent of the early infarct lesion, quantitative NWU could be used as an imaging biomarker to assess the degree of blood-brain barrier damage in order to predict the risk of sICH in patients with wake up stroke., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JF: German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF), German Ministry of Economy and Innovation (BMWi), German Research Foundation (DFG), European Union (EU), Hamburgische Investitions- und Förderbank (IFB). GT: Grants by the European Union (Grant No. 278276 und 634809) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 936, Projekt C2). AK: research collaboration agreement: Siemens Healthcare (company involved in CT/MRI distribution). All other authors reported no relationships with commercial firms whose products could be affected by the present study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is recommended as the preferred thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to explore tPA-related adverse events (AEs) reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), assess the potential safety of three preferred tPA therapies for treating AMI, and provide guidance for selecting tPA for prehospital thrombolysis., Method: Four algorithms, including ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS, were used to quantify the signals of Tenecteplase, Reteplase, and Alteplase related AEs and compare the differential degrees of the three tPA-associated AEs in the actual data., Result: We detected 18 signals of Tenecteplase-induced AE, 29 signals of Reteplase-induced AE, and 22 signals of Alteplase-induced AE. Among the three drugs, Tenecteplase had the highest signal intensity for intracranial hemorrhage-related AE, followed by Alteplase. Besides, Reteplase had the highest signal intensity for procedure-related AE and Alteplase had the highest signal intensity for arrhythmia-related AE. The time-onset analysis indicates that we should be vigilant for AEs, especially within the first week and the first 1-2 days after medication., Conclusion: This study identified and compared the signals of AE related to Tenecteplase, Reteplase, and Alteplase in AMI patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS., Methods and Results: This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P <0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes., Conclusions: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Background: The association between stroke revascularization therapies and poststroke epilepsy is only sparsely investigated, and results are conflicting. The aim of this study is to investigate whether stroke revascularization therapies are associated with different risks of poststroke epilepsy., Methods and Results: We conducted a nationwide, register-based, propensity score-matched cohort study. We identified 40 816 patients admitted with a first ischemic stroke and no prior history of epilepsy in Denmark between January 1, 2011, and December 16, 2018. Of these, 6541 were treated with thrombolysis, 379 with thrombectomy, and 1005 with both thrombolysis and thrombectomy. The 3 treatment groups were each matched 1:1 to patients with stroke not treated with revascularization. Exact matching was done for sex, while propensity scores included information on stroke severity, cortical involvement, age, comorbidities, and socioeconomic parameters. Outcome was any diagnosis of epilepsy. We used Cox regressions to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of epilepsy after ischemic stroke. Compared with matched patients with ischemic stroke not receiving revascularization treatment, patients who received thrombolysis alone had 32% lower risk of epilepsy (adjusted HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.81]) and patients who received thrombolysis and thrombectomy had 45% lower risk of epilepsy (adjusted HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.41-0.73]). Thrombectomy alone was not associated with significantly lower risk of epilepsy compared with matched patients with ischemic stroke not receiving revascularization therapy (adjusted HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.57-1.29])., Conclusions: Thrombolysis alone and in combination with thrombectomy in ischemic stroke was associated with lower risk of epilepsy, whereas thrombectomy alone was not associated with lower risk of epilepsy.

Background: Clot-in-transit is associated with high mortality, but optimal management strategies remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with clot-in-transit., Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with documented clot-in-transit in the right heart on echocardiography across 2 institutions between January 2020 and October 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation., Results: Among 35 patients included in the study, 10 patients (28.6%) received anticoagulation alone and 2 patients (5.7%) received systemic thrombolysis, while 23 patients (65.7%) underwent catheter-based therapy (CBT; 22 mechanical thrombectomy and 1 catheter-directed thrombolysis). Over a median follow-up of 30 days, 9 patients (25.7%) experienced the primary composite outcome. Compared with anticoagulation alone, patients who received CBT or systemic thrombolysis had significantly lower rates of the primary composite outcome (12% versus 60%; log-rank P <0.001; hazard ratio, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.03-0.54]; P =0.005) including a lower rate of death (8% versus 50%; hazard ratio, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.02-0.55]; P =0.008), resuscitated cardiac arrest (4% versus 30%; hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01-1.15]; P =0.067), or hemodynamic deterioration (4% versus 30%; hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01-1.15]; P =0.067)., Conclusions: In this study of CBT in patients with clot-in-transit, CBT or systemic thrombolysis was associated with a significantly lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes, including a lower rate of death compared with anticoagulation alone driven by the CBT group. CBT has the potential to improve outcomes. Further large-scale studies are needed to test these associations., Competing Interests: Dr Bangalore is on the Advisory Board of Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Reata, Inari, and Truvic. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been associated with an increased risk for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). As individuals with cancer who experience AIS tend to face higher mortality rates compared to AIS patients without cancer, recognizing the implications of RCC in AIS is crucial for identifying high-risk patients for major complications and directing management strategies., Objective: To examine risk factors, interventions, and outcomes for patients with AIS stratified by their RCC diagnosis., Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for the period 2010-2019 using International Classification of Disease 10th Edition (ICD-10) codes for acute ischemic stroke and renal malignancies. We assessed demographic information, comorbidities, and clinical interventions between patients presenting with AIS, with and without renal malignancies. A logistic regression model was employed to further examine mortality outcomes., Results: Among 1,609,817 patients identified with AIS, 2,068 (0.12%) had a concomitant diagnosis of RCC. AIS patients with RCC were older (72.09 yrs. vs. 70.9 yrs., p < 0.01), more often white (72.05% vs. 68.16%, p < 0.01), and had similar stroke severity scores. RCC patients received less tissue plasminogen activator (tPA; 4.98% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.02) but underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) at similar rates. RCC patients had more complications (p < 0.01) as well as longer hospital stays (8.19 days vs. 5.98 days, p < 0.01), and higher rates of mortality (11.27% vs. 5.63%, p < 0.01), when compared to their non-RCC counterparts. Propensity score-adjusted analysis largely confirmed these findings, with RCC being positively associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.373, p < 0.01) and longer stays (OR: 2.591, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: In addition to describing the demographics and clinical course of AIS patients diagnosed with RCC, our study underscores the substantial impact of RCC on AIS outcomes. Despite experiencing strokes of similar severity, AIS patients diagnosed with RCC are at a heightened risk of complications, including thromboembolic events and infections, leading to elevated in-hospital mortality rates and prolonged hospital stays., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

All foreign bodies inserted in the circulatory system are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of anticoagulation during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses, and also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with hemodynamic instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed. The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right heart valve thrombosis. In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus formed on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. If the thrombus persists following anticoagulant treatment, the recommended options include thrombolytic treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option. While these clinical scenarios may initially appear to have straightforward solutions in terms of surgery, thrombolysis, or effective anticoagulation, real-world clinical experience often proves more complex. For instance, a patient with some usual comorbidities and non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, experiencing symptoms solely by repeated systemic embolizations, might undergo all three therapeutic options due to the unpredictable nature of MVT. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current recommendations, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Despite systemic thrombolysis, a few patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remain hemodynamically unstable. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a considerable lifesaving therapy but systemic thrombolysis before cannulation could carry a high risk of hemorrhage and alter the prognosis., Methods: Between June 2012 and June 2023, we retrospectively analyzed from three intensive care units in Sorbonne University, ECMO-related complications and 90-day mortality for high-risk PE patients who received ECMO without previous systemic thrombolysis compared to those cannulated after systemic thrombolysis failure. Hospital discharge survivors were assessed for long-term health-related quality of life and echocardiographic evaluations., Results: 72 high-risk PE patients [median age 48 (37-61) years, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) 74 (60-85)] were placed on VA-ECMO for 5 (5-7) days. 31 (43%) patients underwent pre-ECMO thrombolysis (thrombolysis ECMO group, T +) compared to 41 patients (57%, no thrombolysis ECMO group, T-). There was more pre-ECMO cardiac arrest in the thrombolysis ECMO group (94% vs. 67%, p = 0.02). Ninety-day survival was not different between groups (39% vs 46%, log-rank test, p = 0.31). There was no difference in severe hemorrhages (61% vs 59%, p = 1). Twenty-five over 28 patients attended follow-up at a median time of 69 (52-95) months. Long-term quality of life was acceptable and none of them experienced chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension., Conclusions: Ninety-day survival and bleeding events rates did not differ in patients treated with VA-ECMO after systemic thrombolysis compared to those who were not. Recent systemic thrombolysis, as a single parameter, should not be considered as a contraindication for VA-ECMO in high-risk PE., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery combined with fibrinolytic therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), but a meticulous patient selection is required, because not every patient benefits from it. The ICH score facilitates a reliable patient selection for fibrinolytic therapy except for ICH-4. This study evaluated whether an additional use of other prognostic tools can overcome this limitation., Materials and Methods: A consecutive ICH patient cohort treated with fibrinolytic therapy between 2010 and 2020 was retrospectively analysed. The following prognostic tools were calculated: APACHE II, ICH-GS, ICH-FUNC, and ICH score. The discrimination power of every score was determined by ROC-analysis. Primary outcome parameters regarding the benefit of fibrinolytic therapy were the in-hospital mortality and a poor outcome defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) > 4., Results: A total of 280 patients with a median age of 72 years were included. The mortality rates according to the ICH score were ICH-0 = 0 % (0/0), ICH-1 = 0 % (0/22), ICH-2 = 7.1 % (5/70), ICH-3 = 17.3 % (19/110), ICH-4 = 67.2 % (45/67), ICH-5 = 100 % (11/11). The APACHE II showed the best discrimination power for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and for poor outcome (AUC = 0.79, p < 0.0001). In the subgroup with ICH-4, APACHE II with a cut-off of 24.5 showed a good discriminating power for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.001) and for poor outcome (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: An additional application of APACHE II score increases the discriminating power of ICH score 4 enabling a more precise appraisal of in-hospital mortality and of functional outcome, which could support the patient selection for fibrinolytic therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Tenecteplase (TNK) is a promising alternative to alteplase (ALT) as the thrombolytic agent for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its clinical outcomes in certain populations remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety among different doses of TNK in AIS patients., Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for studies comparing at least one dose of TNK to another dose of TNK or ALT 0.90 mg/kg. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for all outcomes using ALT 0.90 mg/kg as the reference. The treatments were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values., Results: We included 11 trials from 16 publications comprising 5423 participants. There were no significant differences between any doses of TNK and ALT for reperfusion, 3-month modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68), mRS 0-2 (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.86), mortality (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.25 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.88), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.70), and parenchymal hematoma (rank 1st: TNK 0.10 mg/kg; SUCRA = 0.68). TNK 0.40 mg/kg had a significantly higher sICH rate compared to TNK 0.25 mg/kg (RR = 2.39, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.92). Among elderly patients, TNK 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly lower rate of sICH than ALT 0.9 mg/kg (RR = 3.0 × 10 -13 , 95% CrI = 3.4 × 10 -40 -0.07)., Conclusions: TNK has efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to those of ALT. TNK 0.25 mg/kg may be the optimal dose of TNK for patients with AIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tenecteplase (TNK) is considered a promising option for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with the potential to decrease door-to-needle times (DTN). This study investigates DTN metrics and trends after transition to tenecteplase., Methods: The Lone Star Stroke (LSS) Research Consortium TNK registry incorporated data from three Texas hospitals that transitioned to TNK. Subject data mapped to Get-With-the-Guidelines stroke variables from October 1, 2019 to March 31, 2023 were limited to patients who received either alteplase (ALT) or TNK within the 90 min DTN times. The dataset was stratified into ALT and TNK cohorts with univariate tables for each measured variable and further analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were constructed for both ALT and TNK to investigate trends in DTN times., Results: In the overall cohort, the TNK cohort (n = 151) and ALT cohort (n = 161) exhibited comparable population demographics, differing only in a higher prevalence of White individuals in the TNK cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated similar clinical parameters, including mean NIHSS, blood glucose levels, and systolic blood pressure at admission. In the univariate analysis, no difference was observed in median DTN time within the 90 min time window compared to the ALT cohort [40 min (30-53) vs 45 min (35-55); P = .057]. In multivariable models, DTN times by thrombolytic did not significantly differ when adjusting for NIHSS, age (P = .133), or race and ethnicity (P = .092). Regression models for the overall cohort indicate no significant DTN temporal trends for TNK (P = .84) after transition; nonetheless, when stratified by hospital, a single subgroup demonstrated a significant DTN upward trend (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: In the overall cohort, TNK and ALT exhibited comparable temporal trends and at least stable DTN times. This indicates that the shift to TNK did not have an adverse impact on the DTN stroke metrics. This seamless transition is likely attributed to the similarity of inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as the administration processes for both medications. When stratified by hospital, the three subgroups demonstrated variable DTN time trends which highlight the potential for either fatigue or unpreparedness when switching to TNK. Because our study included a multi-ethnic cohort from multiple large Texas cities, the stable DTN times after transition to TNK is likely applicable to other healthcare systems., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the associations between platelet count (PC) and in-hospital outcomes for patients with stroke after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis., Methods: We identified patients who had been hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of stroke and had received rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis from June 2015 to July 2019 at participating hospitals in the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance. PC measured before intravenous thrombolysis was categorized into the following four groups: severe thrombocytopenia (PC < 100 × 10 9 /L), mild thrombocytopenia (100 ≤ PC < 150 × 10 9 /L), normal PC (150 ≤ PC ≤ 450 × 10 9 /L), and thrombocythemia (PC > 450 × 10 9 /L). Outcomes were determined from clinical data collected during hospitalization. The primary clinical outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes were mortality, bleeding events, gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, and in-hospital stroke recurrence. We used multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate the associations between PC and outcomes., Results: We included 44,882 individuals with a median age of 66 years, of whom 34.7 % were female, 951 (2.1 %) had severe thrombocytopenia, 7218 (16.1 %) had mild thrombocytopenia, 36,522 (81.4 %) had a normal PC, and 191 (0.4 %) had thrombocythemia. Both severe and mild thrombocytopenia groups had higher risks of bleeding events (adjusted OR 1.30; 95 % CI,1.01-1.67; p = 0.045; adjusted OR 1.32; 95 % CI,1.19-1.46; p < 0.001) and sICH (adjusted OR 1.48;95 % CI,1.13-1.94; p = 0.005; adjusted OR 1.43;95 % CI,1.27-1.60; p < 0.001) than the normal PC group. Patients with 100 ≤ PC < 150 × 10 9 /L also had a higher risk of in-hospital stroke recurrence (adjusted OR 1.12; 95 % CI,1.02-1.22; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Intravenous thrombolysis brings a high risk of sICH given PC < 150 × 10 9 /L, especially PC < 100 × 10 9 /L. It indicated that PC < 100 × 10 9 /L is a reasonable contraindication to thrombolysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Systemic thrombolysis (ST) may not be ideal for many patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) due to bleeding risk. In this analysis, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as an alternative to ST for acute PE., Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent MT and/or ST for PE were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. Patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis were excluded. We compared in-hospital outcomes of both groups in this retrospective study., Results: Of 16 890 patients who received an intervention for acute PE, 1380 (8.2%) received MT and 15 510 (91.8%) received ST. There was no difference in age between both groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received MT than that in those who received ST (11.9% vs 20.6%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.93, p=0.028). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of periprocedural bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury between the 2 groups (p≥0.608 for all). Patients who received MT had a higher rate of respiratory complications (19.0% vs 11.6%, OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.06-3.03, p=0.030) and discharge to an outside facility (34.1% vs 19.2%, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.41-3.37, p<0.001) than those who received ST., Conclusion: Mortality was significantly lower with MT than that with ST, but larger randomized studies are needed to validate this. The use of MT should be individualized on the basis of the patients' clinical presentation, risk profile, and local resources., Clinical Impact: In this study, we utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to study the in-hospital outcomes of pulmonary embolism patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy compared to those who underwent systemic thrombolysis. We found that the patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and underwent mechanical thrombectomy had significantly lower mortality compared to those who were treated using systemic thrombolysis. This study was the first of its kind, utilizing the national inpatient sample database for evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy in comparison with the standard of care. These result would direct further randomized controlled trials for better evaluation of the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy in the correct clinical context. Furthermore, our study demonstrated comparable peri-operative complications between the mechanical thrombectomy group and the systemic thrombolysis group. These results would direct clinicians to consider mechanical thrombectomy if clinically indicated given the promising results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Whether minor ischemic stroke (MIS) patients can benefit from intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains controversial. The association between the efficacy of IVT and baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is unclear in MIS, while the association in moderate and severe stroke is known. This study aimed to explore the effect of IVT in patients with MIS and analyze its efficacy in patients with different baseline NIHSS scores., Methods: Patients with a NIHSS score ≤5 within 4.5 h of stroke onset were screened in 32 centers. Patients with and without IVT were matched to a ratio of 1:1 with propensity scores. An excellent outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 at three months after stroke onset. Safety outcomes included mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate analysis was used to compute the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for excellent outcomes. The effect of IVT was further analyzed in subgroups according to the baseline NIHSS score., Results: Of the 23,853 screened, 3336 patients with MIS who arrived at the hospital within 4.5 h of onset were included. The 1163 patients treated with IVT were matched with 1163 patients without IVT. IVT in minor strokes generated an adjusted OR of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.09-1.75, p  = 0.009) for excellent outcomes. There were no significant differences in mortality (0.17% vs. 0.09%, p =  1.000) and sICH (0.69% vs. 0.86%, p =  0.813) between patients with and without IVT. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant effect of IVT in the baseline NIHSS 0-1 or 2-3 subgroups, with adjusted OR of 0.816 (95% CI 0.437-1.53, p  = 0.525) and1.22 (95% CI 0.845-1.77, p  = 0.287), respectively. In patients with NIHSS score of 4-5, IVT was significantly effective, with an adjusted OR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.02-2.30, p  = 0.038)., Conclusion: IVT can improve MIS outcomes. The risks of sICH and mortality did not increase, especially in patients with NIHSS scores 4 to 5, who could benefit from IVT significantly.

Background: In the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO-AIS), current data are conflicting as to whether a mothership model of management (MS) is associated with better functional recovery than a drip-and-ship model (DS)., Method: Files from LVO-AIS patients treated with MT at CHU Charleroi were analyzed between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2022. Consecutive patients with a LVO-AIS of the anterior circulation and a prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 were included. The study's primary endpoint was the functional independence, defined as a mRS of 0-2 at 3 months post-stroke. Times metrics of MT and thrombolysis application, safety outcome including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death were recorded. We conducted similar analyses by dividing DS patients, depending of their transfer time (less or >20 min). Logistic regression was used to assess if differences in baseline characteristics affected the primary outcome., Results: 366 patients were included: 229 in the DS group and 137 in the MS group. Demographic data showed a higher rate of tobacco use and lower functional status prestroke in the MS population. The MS group demonstrated better performance in time metrics related to thrombolysis and MT administration. The proportion of patients achieving an mRS of 0-2 at 3 months was similar in the DS and MS groups (50.22 % vs. 48.17 %, p = 0.706). The same conclusions were drawn from the subgroup analysis. Logistic regression analysis showed no impact of baseline characteristic differences on the primary outcome., Conclusion: Despite faster access to MT in the MS model, our study did not find any significant differences in functional recovery at three months post-stroke between the MS and DS management models. Our data suggest further that the prestroke health status was an important factor influencing functional outcomes after LVO-AIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: There are limited data available demonstrating the safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation., Materials and Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the Alteplase compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) pragmatic, phase 3, registry-linked randomized controlled trial. Patients with any posterior circulation vessel occlusion on baseline imaging were included. Study outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal mRS, death within 90 days, 24 h symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and successful reperfusion/recanalization. Mixed effects regression adjusting for age, sex and stroke severity was used to analyze differences in outcomes between patients administered tenecteplase vs. alteplase. Further, sensitivity analysis was conducted for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) alone., Results: Of 1577 patients, 136 (8.6 %, 77:alteplase, 59:tenecteplase) had posterior circulation stroke. Baseline characteristics were similar[median age 71 (IQR 60-81) vs. 72 (IQR 65-82) years, 57.1 % vs. 67.8 % males, median baseline NIHSS 7 (IQR 4-12) vs. 7 (IQR 4-16) in alteplase vs. tenecteplase arms, respectively]. 28 patients (20.6 %, 16:alteplase, 12:tenecteplase arm) underwent EVT. The median 90-120 days mRS was 2 (IQR 1-4). There were no differences between alteplase and tenecteplase for 90-d mRS 0-1 (adjRR 0.93;95 %CI 0.63-1.36), 90-day mRS 0-2 (adjRR 0.95; 95 %CI 0.72-1.26), sICH (RR 0.65; 95 %CI 0.06-7.02) and mortality (RR 1.21; 95 %CI 0.61-2.38). Successful reperfusion eTICI 2b-3 and successful recanalization rAOL 2b-3 was achieved in 23/28 (82 %, 12:alteplase, 11:tenecteplase) and in 16/28 (57 %, 14:alteplase, 12:tenecteplase), respectively. Similar results were seen in 31 patients (22.8 %) with BAO., Conclusion: Intravenous tenecteplase has a similar effect on outcome as alteplase, without increased safety concerns in patients with acute posterior circulation strokes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest PC has received honoraria from ESMINT. LC has received payments by Servier and consulting fees from Ischaemavie RAPID, Circle NV, and Canadian Medical Protective Association. SBC is principal investigator of the TEMPO-2 trial, for which Boehringer Ingelheim provides the study drug (tenecteplase). MDH has received consulting fees from Sun Pharma and Brainsgate and has stock options in Circle NVI. AYP has received a project research grant from Stryker and honoraria from BMS-Pfizer. RHS has stock options in FollowMD and receives salary support for research from the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada, Sandra Black Centre for Brain Resilience & Recovery, and Ontario Brain Institute. BKM has stock options in Circle NVI and has consulted for Biogen and Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Previously published data are conflicting regarding the ability of tenecteplase versus alteplase to produce early recanalization of an intracranial large vessel occlusion. We compared the performance of each thrombolytic in a stroke network., Methods: We queried our prospectively collected code stroke registry for basilar, internal carotid, or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis from 11/17/2021-9/16/2023. The primary outcome was early recanalization, defined using angiographic or clinical criteria. Secondary and safety outcomes included 90-day functional independence and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent associations with the primary outcome., Results: 233 patients, with mean age 66.9 (16.6) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 (10-21), were included. One-hundred twenty-four of 233 (53.2 %) patients were treated with alteplase while 109/233 (46.8 %) were treated with tenecteplase. Endovascular thrombectomy was performed in 82 % of subjects. Early recanalization rates were similar between the groups (alteplase 22.6 %, tenecteplase 14.7 %; p = 0.14), as were rates of 90-day independent neurological function, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Patients with an internal carotid artery occlusion or with higher presenting stroke severity were less likely to achieve early recanalization., Conclusions: Tenecteplase and alteplase have similar rates of early recanalization, 90-day functional independence, and safety outcomes in large vessel occlusion patients. Occlusion site and stroke severity predict response to thrombolysis. Future studies may investigate other factors associated with a positive response to thrombolytics as expanded treatment indications are explored., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Andrew W. Asimos reports a relationship with RapidAI that includes: consulting or advisory. Joe D. Bernard reports a relationship with Viz.ai, Inc. that includes: equity or stocks. Joe D. Bernard reports a relationship with Stryker that includes: consulting or advisory. Joe D. Bernard reports a relationship with Terumo Interventional Systems that includes: consulting or advisory. Joe D. Bernard reports a relationship with RapidAI that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few studies with a limited number of patients focused on the outcomes of patients with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-negative acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular treatment (EVT)., Methods: This retrospective observational, single-center study included all consecutive patients admitted for AIS involving the anterior circulation and treated with IVT and/or EVT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2023. The collected data were used to identify the characteristics of patients with negative DWI and to compare outcomes in patients with negative and positive DWI., Results: Among the 1210 patients included, 47 (3.9 %) had negative (DWI-negative group) and 1163 had increased DWI signal (DWI-positive group). In the DWI-negative group, the mean age was 69 years (SD=19.4), 55.3 % were men, and 27 (57.4 %) had a large vessel occlusion. Thirty eight (80.9 %) were treated with IVT alone, 7 (14.9 %) with EVT alone, and 2 (4.3 %) with both. Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were the most sensitive to detect predictive factors of cerebral ischemia, such as vessel thrombosis and the spaghetti sign that were found in 68.1 % and 83 %, of patients, respectively. Oxyhemoglobin-sensitive (T2*) and susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN) sequences were less sensitive: vessel thrombosis and the brush sign were detected in 55.3 % and 19.1 % of patients, respectively. Comparison of the two DWI groups showed that M2 occlusion was more frequent (31.9 % vs 13 %, p<0.001) and M1 occlusion rarer (19.1 % vs 36 %, p<0.02) in the DWI-negative than DWI-positive group. At admission, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was lower in the DWI-negative than DWI-positive group (2 vs 6, p=0.0001), but the median symptom onset-to-MRI time was similar in both groups (108 vs 111 min, p=0.88)., Conclusions: In patients with DWI-negative AIS, symptoms are less severe. Large vessel occlusions, notably in the M2 segment, are more distal at the expense of the M1 segment of MCA. The spaghetti sign remains the most predictive feature of AIS that should be specifically searched in the absence of DWI lesions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Post thrombolytic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with higher rate of death or disability in acute ischemic stroke patients. We investigated the relationship between post thrombolytic ICH volume and change in volume and death or disability at 90 days in acute ischemic stroke patients., Methods: We analyzed 110 patents recruited in the Safety Evaluation of 3K3A-APC in Ischemic Stroke (RHAPSODY) trial who received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) followed by mechanical thrombectomy (if indicated) and 3K3A-APC or placebo. ICH volume was measured at Day 2 and Day 7 using susceptibility weighted sequence (SWI) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also calculated the post thrombolytic ICH volume change between Day 2 and Day 7. Outcomes were determined by using utility weighted modified Rankin scale (UW-mRs) at 90-days, Outcomes were determined by using utility weighted modified Rankin scale (UW-mRS) at 90 days. To minimize interpretation bias, outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation and clinical data.We adjusted for age, gender, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (<10,10-19 and ≥20), location of hemorrhage (single basal ganglia hemorrhage, single lobar, single cerebellum, and multiple sites) in multivariate regression analysis., Results: A total of 88 (80%) of 110 patients had post thrombolytic ICH (mean volume 28.3 ml ± SD 62 ml). The strata of ICH volume were not associated with UW-mRs at 90 days: <20 cc (regression coefficient (RC)-0.05, p= 0.58), 20-39 cc (RC-0.22, p=0.17), or ≥40 cc (RC-0.34, p= 0.083) compared with no ICH after adjusting for potential confounders. Change in ICH mean volume 26.78 ml ±59.68, 52 had increase in volume) between Day 2 and day 7 was not associated with UW-mRS at 90 days (RC -67.71, p= 0.06)., Conclusions: We did not observe any independent effect of post thrombolytic ICH volume on death or disability in acute ischemic stroke patients. Although further studies must be done, our data suggest that strategies to prevent ICH expansion such as antifibrinolytic medications and reduction in ICH volume such as surgical evacuation may not reduce death or disability in acute ischemic stroke patients with post thrombolytic ICH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is caused by compression of the subclavian vein at the costoclavicular space, which may lead to vein thrombosis. Current treatment includes thoracic outlet decompression with or without venolysis. However, given its relatively low prevalence, the existing literature is limited. Here, we report our single-institution experience in the treatment of vTOS., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent rib resection for vTOS at our institution from 2007 to 2022. Demographic, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were reviewed., Results: A total of 76 patients were identified. The mean age was 36 years. Swelling was the most common symptom (93%), followed by pain (6.6%). Ninety percent of patients had associated deep vein thrombosis, with 99% of these patients starting anticoagulation preoperatively. A total of 91% of patients underwent rib resection via the infraclavicular approach, 2% via the paraclavicular approach (due to a neurogenic component), and 7% via the transaxillary approach. Eighty-three percent of patients had endovascular intervention before or at the time of the rib resection, with catheter-directed thrombolysis (87%), followed by angioplasty (71%) and rheolytic thrombectomy (57%) being the most common interventions. The median time from endovascular intervention to rib resection was 14 days, with 25% at the same admission. The median postoperative stay was 3 days (2-5 days). There was no perioperative mortality or nerve injury. Fourteen percent of patients had postoperative complications, with bleeding complications (12%) being the most common. Waiting more than 30 days between initial endovascular intervention and rib resection was not associated with decreased risk of bleeding complications. Patients were seen postoperatively at 1-month (physical examination) and 6-month (duplex) intervals or for any new or recurrent symptoms. Twenty-two percent of our overall patient population underwent reintervention, most commonly angioplasty (21%). At last follow-up, 97% of subclavian veins were patent, and 93% of patients were symptom free., Conclusions: Over the last decade, we have transitioned to an infraclavicular approach for isolated vTOS, with low perioperative morbidity and good patency rates. These results support the adoption of the infraclavicular approach with adjunct endovascular techniques as a safe and efficacious treatment of vTOS., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)