Search

Purpose: We performed clustering analysis of patient symptoms to discover common patient subtypes in females and males with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome or chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome., Materials and Methods: The clinical variables included in k-means clustering were urological pain severity, urinary urgency, frequency and nonurological pain, each on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, and a yes or no response to each of the 6 UPOINT (Urological Treatment Program for Chronic Prostatitis) domains, including the urinary, psychosocial, organ specific, infection, neurological/systemic and skeletal muscle tenderness domains., Results: Included in study were 211 patients seeking care of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome or chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. The k-means clustering algorithm identified 3 clusters of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, including 1) a mild pelvic symptom cluster in about 30% of patients, 2) a severe pelvic symptom cluster in about 40% and 3) a systemic symptom cluster in about 30%. Patients in the systemic cluster were younger by about 5 to 7 years and more likely to be female. They had the most severe urinary symptoms (urgency, frequency and painful bladder filling), and the most severe pelvic and nonpelvic pain. They were also more likely to have chronic overlapping pain conditions, psychosocial issues (depression, anxiety and somatic symptoms) and poorer quality of life than patients in the 2 other pelvic clusters. They were not less likely to have Hunner lesions in the bladder., Conclusions: Symptom based clustering identified 3 clusters of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. These patient subtypes had different pelvic and systemic presentations. Patients in the systemic cluster may benefit from interdisciplinary therapies. Future studies are needed to elucidate differences in pathophysiology among these clusters.

Objectives: (1) To compare the severity and distribution of nonurologic and urogenital pain between overactive bladder (OAB), interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) and controls, and (2) To examine the relationships between the severity of urogenital pain and severity of urinary symptoms among patients with OAB., Subjects and Methods: Fifty-one OAB patients, 27 IC/BPS patients, and 30 controls were recruited. Nonurologic pain was assessed using a whole body map and Brief Pain Inventory. Urologic pain was assessed using the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem indexes, Genitourinary Pain Index, and 0-10 pain scale. Urogenital pain was assessed using a genital map, and report of pain related to bladder filling and urination., Results: Among OAB patients, 6% reported pelvic pain only while 28% reported pelvic pain and beyond. 18% reported widespread pain. The distribution of nonurologic pain and urogenital pain in OAB patients were intermediate between IC/BPS and controls (IC/BPS>OAB>controls, P all <.05). The intensity of pain reported by OAB patients was intermediate between controls and IC/BPS (average 2.3 vs 0.8 vs 4.3 out of 10, P <.001). Among OAB patients, the pain severity (GUPI-pain, ICSI-pain, ICPI-pain) was positively correlated with urinary severity (UDI-6, IIQ-7, OABq-SS, OABq-QOL, P all < .05). OAB patients with pelvic pain have worse urinary symptoms and psychosocial health (anxiety, depression) compared to OAB patients without pelvic pain., Conclusion: A subset of OAB patients has pain inside and/or outside the pelvis. The intensity and distribution of pain in OAB was intermediate between IC/BPS and controls. Systemic processes such as central sensitization should be examined in this population., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)