Search

Progression-free survival and hazard ratios by histology

Supplementary tables S1-S3 and Supplementary figures S1-Se

Purpose:Advanced-stage endometrial cancers have limited treatment options and poor prognosis, highlighting the need to understand genetic drivers of therapeutic vulnerabilities and/or prognostic predictors. We examined whether prospective molecular characterization of recurrent and metastatic disease can reveal grade and histology-specific differences, facilitating enrollment onto clinical trials.Experimental Design:We integrated prospective clinical sequencing and IHC data with detailed clinical and treatment histories for 197 tumors, profiled by MSK-IMPACT from 189 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.Results:Patients had advanced disease and high-grade histologies, with poor progression-free survival on first-line therapy (PFS1). When matched for histology and grade, the genomic landscape was similar to that of primary untreated disease profiled by TCGA. Using multiple complementary genomic and mutational signature-based methods, we identified patients with microsatellite instability (MSI), even when standard MMR protein IHC staining failed. Tumor and matched normal DNA sequencing identified rare pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA2 and MLH1. Clustering the pattern of DNA copy-number alterations revealed a novel subset characterized by heterozygous losses across the genome and significantly worse outcomes compared with other clusters (median PFS1 9.6 months vs. 17.0 and 17.4 months; P = 0.006). Of the 68% of patients harboring potentially actionable mutations, 27% were enrolled to matched clinical trials, of which 47% of these achieved clinical benefit.Conclusions:Prospective clinical sequencing of advanced endometrial cancer can help refine prognosis and aid treatment decision making by simultaneously detecting microsatellite status, germline predisposition syndromes, and potentially actionable mutations. A small overall proportion of all patients tested received investigational, genomically matched therapy as part of clinical trials.

Additional clinical information for patients in MSKCC cohort

Purpose:This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of adavosertib in combination with four chemotherapy agents commonly used in patients with primary platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.Patients and Methods:Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with measurable disease were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2018 in this open-label, four-arm, multicenter, phase II study. Patients received adavosertib (oral capsules, 2 days on/5 days off or 3 days on/4 days off) in six cohorts from 175 mg once daily to 225 mg twice daily combined with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, carboplatin, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The primary outcome measurement was overall response rate.Results:Three percent of patients (3/94) had confirmed complete response and 29% (27/94) had confirmed partial response. The response rate was highest with carboplatin plus weekly adavosertib, at 66.7%, with 100% disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of 12.0 months. The longest median duration of response was in the paclitaxel cohort (12.0 months). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts were neutropenia [45/94 (47.9%) patients], anemia [31/94 (33.0%)], thrombocytopenia [30/94 (31.9%)], and diarrhea and vomiting [10/94 (10.6%) each].Conclusions:Adavosertib showed preliminary efficacy when combined with chemotherapy. The most promising treatment combination was adavosertib 225 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 plus carboplatin every 21 days. However, hematologic toxicity was more frequent than would be expected for carboplatin monotherapy, and the combination requires further study to optimize the dose, schedule, and supportive medications.

Supplementary Table and Figure Legends

Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of adavosertib in combination with four chemotherapy agents commonly used in patients with primary platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with measurable disease were enrolled between January 2015 and January 2018 in this open-label, four-arm, multicenter, phase II study. Patients received adavosertib (oral capsules, 2 days on/5 days off or 3 days on/4 days off) in six cohorts from 175 mg once daily to 225 mg twice daily combined with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, carboplatin, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The primary outcome measurement was overall response rate. Results: Three percent of patients (3/94) had confirmed complete response and 29% (27/94) had confirmed partial response. The response rate was highest with carboplatin plus weekly adavosertib, at 66.7%, with 100% disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of 12.0 months. The longest median duration of response was in the paclitaxel cohort (12.0 months). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events across all cohorts were neutropenia [45/94 (47.9%) patients], anemia [31/94 (33.0%)], thrombocytopenia [30/94 (31.9%)], and diarrhea and vomiting [10/94 (10.6%) each]. Conclusions: Adavosertib showed preliminary efficacy when combined with chemotherapy. The most promising treatment combination was adavosertib 225 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 plus carboplatin every 21 days. However, hematologic toxicity was more frequent than would be expected for carboplatin monotherapy, and the combination requires further study to optimize the dose, schedule, and supportive medications.

Background: Abemaciclib is an oral selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 approved for hormone receptor (HR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- metastatic breast cancer. In the randomized, 3-arm, phase 2 study monarcHER (NCT02675231) for HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC), abemaciclib in combination with trastuzumab (T) and fulvestrant (F) significantly improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (whereas abemaciclib + T did not) versus (vs) T + physician’s choice of chemotherapy and demonstrated a tolerable safety profile. Here, patient-reported HRQoL, functioning, and symptoms are reported. Methods: In monarcHER, 237 postmenopausal (surgical, natural, or chemical ovarian suppression) women with ABC and ≥2 prior HER2+ directed therapies in the advanced setting were randomized 1:1:1 to abemaciclib (150 mg PO Q12H every 21 days) + T (IV infusion on D1 every 21 days) with F (500 mg IM on Cycle 1 D1 and D15 and Cycle 2 D8, then Q4W; Arm A) or without F (Arm B) vs T + physician’s choice of chemotherapy (per label every 21 days; Arm C). Supportive measures to manage diarrhea were permitted. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline and at each cycle using the modified Brief Pain Inventory-short form (mBPI-sf) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D 5L) questionnaire was also collected. Higher scores on EORTC QLQ-C30 functional and health status/QoL scales indicate improvement whereas higher scores on EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scales and mBPI-sf indicate worsening of symptoms/pain. The EQ-5D 5L index score was calculated from a set of item weights to derive a score of 0-1, with 1 representing the best health status. Treatment arm comparisons of change from baseline (all post-baseline visits) were conducted using a mixed model repeated measure, with .05 considered statistically significant. Clinical meaningfulness was defined as a ≥10-point score change from baseline (on a 0-100 scale) for EORTC QLQ-C30 and a 2-point score change from baseline for mBPI-sf. Results: Patient-reported outcome compliance rates were ≥90% through Cycle 15; the range for median duration of each treatment component of each arm was 7.5-10.0 cycles. Overall, no statistically significant or clinically meaningful changes from baseline differences were observed between treatment arms for mBPI-sf pain scores or EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score, function scales, or for symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, or financial difficulties. Least square (LS) mean change from baseline differences showed statistically significant improvements in Arm A vs C for EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms of pain (-6.81; p=.026) and insomnia (-6.39; p=.041). Worsening for the symptom of nausea/vomiting was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful in Arm A vs C (4.08; p=.043). Diarrhea showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful worsening in Arm A vs C (19.27; p Conclusions: Quality of life was maintained for patient-reported pain, global health, functioning, and most symptoms when abemaciclib was added to T + F compared with physician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with HR+, HER2+ ABC. Gastrointestinal-related symptoms were transient and consistent with the manageable, reversible adverse event profile. Citation Format: Sara M Tolaney, Andrew M Wardley, Stefania Zambelli, John F. Hilton, Tiffany A Troso-Sandoval, Francesco Ricci, Seock-Ah Im, Sung-Bae Kim, Stephen RD Johnston, Arlene Chan, Shom Goel, Kristen Catron, Zhengyu Yang, M. Corona Gianford, Gregory L Price, Fabrice André. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in monarcHER: Abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus standard-of-care chemotherapy in HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-10.

Background PI3K pathway activation is common in endometrial cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, LY3023414, in patients with advanced endometrial cancer harboring activating mutations in the PI3K pathway. Methods We conducted a single-arm phase 2 study of monotherapy LY3023414. Eligible patients had advanced endometrial cancer of any grade, prior management with 1-4 cytotoxic lines, and PI3K pathway activation prospectively defined as a loss-of-function PTEN alteration or activating alteration in PIK3CA, AKT1, PIK3R1, PIK3R2, or MTOR. The primary objective was best overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Results Twenty-eight patients were treated; histologies included endometroid (39%), carcinosarcoma (25%), serous (21%), and mixed (14%). Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 2 prior cytotoxic lines (range, 1-3). The most common alterations involved PIK3CA (68%), PTEN (43%), and PIK3R1 (32%). In the 25 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 16% (90% CI, 7%-100%), and the clinical benefit rate was 28% (90% CI, 16%-100%). Four patients had a confirmed partial response, and 2 responses lasted for >9 months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.0) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 5.0-15.9), respectively. The most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events were anemia (71%), hyperglycemia (71%), hypoalbuminemia (68%), and hypophosphatemia (61%). No correlation between molecular alterations and response was observed. Conclusion In patients with heavily pretreated advanced endometrial cancer prospectively selected for tumors with activating PI3K pathway mutations, LY3023414 demonstrated modest single-agent activity and a manageable safety profile.

PURPOSE The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer during secondary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were intraoperatively randomly assigned to carboplatin HIPEC (800 mg/m2 for 90 minutes) or no HIPEC, followed by five or six cycles of postoperative IV carboplatin-based chemotherapy, respectively. Based on a binomial single-stage pick-the-winner design, an arm was considered winner if ≥ 17 of 49 patients were without disease progression at 24 months post-surgery. Secondary objectives included postoperative toxicity and HIPEC pharmacokinetics. RESULTS Of 98 patients, 49 (50%) received HIPEC. Complete gross resection was achieved in 82% of the HIPEC patients and 94% of the standard-arm patients. Bowel resection was performed in 37% of patients in the HIPEC arm compared with 65% in the standard ( P = .008). There was no perioperative mortality and no difference in use of ostomies, length of stay, or postoperative toxicity. At 24 months, eight patients (16.3%; 1-sided 90% CI, 9.7 to 100) were without progression or death in the HIPEC arm and 12 (24.5%; 1-sided 90% CI, 16.5 to 100) in the standard arm. With a medium follow-up of 39.5 months, 82 patients progressed and 37 died. The median progression-free survival in the HIPEC and standard arms were 12.3 and 15.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1 to 2.37; P = .05). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (52.5 v 59.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.67; P = .31). These analyses were exploratory. CONCLUSION HIPEC with carboplatin was well tolerated but did not result in superior clinical outcomes. This study does not support the use of HIPEC with carboplatin during secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

5589 Background: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) allows tumor escape through kynurenine production, which induces regulatory T cells and suppresses effector T-cell proliferation. NIVO, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor can upregulate IDO1, supporting the rationale for combining NIVO with IDO. We report results of NIVO as monotherapy and in combination with IDO inhibitor BMS-986205 in the treatment of pts with recurrent EC. Methods: In this single-institution, randomized phase 2 study, eligible pts must have received 1-4 prior lines of chemotherapy and have measurable disease by RECIST v 1.1. All EC histologies, including carcinosarcoma, were allowed. Pts with microsatellite insufficient (MSI-H) or mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors were excluded. Pts were randomized to NIVO 480mg IV every 4 weeks (wks) with or without IDO 100mg orally daily. Primary endpoints were Overall Response Rate [ORR = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)] by RECIST v 1.1. Secondary objectives were duration of response (DOR), median progression free survival (mPFS), PFS rate at 24 wks (PFS24wks) and safety. Overall survival (OS) was also evaluated. Results: Between 10/2019 and 11/2021, pts were randomized to receive either NIVO (n = 12) or NIVO + IDO (n = 12). Median age was 67 years (range 48-82) and median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-3). Histologies included serous (n = 5, 21%), endometrioid (n = 10, 42%), clear cell (n = 1, 4.2%), carcinosarcoma (n = 6, 25%), undifferentiated (n = 1, 4.2%), and mucinous (n = 1, 4.2%). In the NIVO + IDO arm, 1 pt achieved partial response (8.3%, CI: 0.9-100%) with DOR of 17.6 months. In the NIVO arm, no responses were observed. Efficacy outcomes are summarized in the table. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) grade ≥ 3 in the NIVO arm included acute kidney injury (n = 1, 8.3%), hypokalemia (n = 1, 8.3%), and thromboembolic event (n = 1, 8.3%). In the NIVO + IDO arm, TRAEs grade ≥ 3 included fatigue (n = 1, 8.3%), and elevated liver function (n = 1, 8.3%). No TRAEs led to study-drug interruption or dose reductions. Conclusions: NIVO monotherapy and in combination with IDO showed acceptable safety in pts with recurrent EC. NIVO in combination with IDO showed ORR of 8.3%. No responses were observed with NIVO monotherapy. The trial closed to accrual due to lack of observed clinical efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT04106414. [Table: see text]

5583 Background: EC and a subset of OVCA are associated with high rates of dMMR and are responsive to PD-1 blockade. It is unknown what additional biomarkers beyond dMMR may enrich for benefit in these patients (pts). Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible pts had recurrent EC or OVCA that met one of the following criteria: 1) dMMR, as determined by immunohistochemical loss of expression of 1+ MMR genes; 2) MSI-H, as determined by next generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT); or 3) hypermutated, defined as 20+ non-synonymous somatic mutations. Pts received nivo 240mg IV every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks until toxicity or progression. The co-primary endpoints were 1) the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks (PFS24) and 2) the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. The study was designed using Simon’s two-stage design, with a sample size of 40 pts based on a promising ORR of 25% with a type I error rate of 0.025 and a type II error rate of 0.05. Overall survival (OS), PFS and duration of response (DOR) were calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE and tabulated. Biomarker analyses on the available archival tissue were performed using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) labeling for CD8, PD-1, TOX, PD-1, PD-L1, and FoxP3. Quantification of immune phenotypes and interaction studies between CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+ cells was performed in HALO. Results: Between 9/2017 and 5/2021, 35 pts were enrolled; the study closed early due to slow accrual. The median duration of follow-up was 33.2 months. The median age was 64 years (range 36-87); 82% of pts were white, 54% had high grade EC, and 65% had confirmed MLH1 hypermethylation. The ORR was 57.1% (97.5% CI 39.4-100%) [37% PR, 20% CR]. The PFS24 was 62.9% and median PFS was 26.7 months (95% CI 4.9-NE). Neither median DOR nor OS was reached. OS at 1 year was 76.4% (95% CI 58.2-87.4%). The ORR in patients with MLH1 hypermethylation was 52%; 4 of 5 patients with confirmed germline MMR alterations had a response by RECIST. AEs were consistent with the reported literature. Notable treatment related AEs included Grade 4 myocarditis with associated grade 4 AV block, grade 2 extraocular paresis, grade 3 Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and grade 3 elevations in AST/ALT. On mIF analysis, PD-L1 expression did not distinguish responders from non-responders, though interaction between CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+ cells was associated with CR/PR. Increase in relative fraction of dysfunctional CD8+ T cells (characterized by CD8+TOX+PD-1+ phenotype) was also associated with CR/PR. Conclusions: Nivo is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H or hypermutated EC or OVCA. Presence of dysfunctional CD8+ T cells in the tumors was associated with response, while expression of PD-L1 was not predictive. Clinical trial information: NCT03241745.

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors. Citation Format: Tolaney SM, Wardley AM, Zambelli S, Hilton JF, Troso-Sandoval TA, Ricci F, Im S-A, Kim S-B, Johnston SR, Chan A, Goel S, Catron K, Yang Z, Gainford C, André F. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-01.

Summary Background Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more previous therapies for advanced disease have few effective treatment options. The monarcHER trial aimed to compare the efficacy of abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant with standard-of-care chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab in women with advanced breast cancer. Methods This phase 2, three-group, open-label trial was done across 75 hospitals, clinics, and medical centres in 14 countries. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older, who had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had previously received at least two HER2-targeted therapies for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to the abemaciclib, trastuzumab, and fulvestrant (group A), abemaciclib and trastuzumab (group B), or standard-of-care chemotherapy and trastuzumab (group C). Oral abemaciclib 150 mg 12 hourly was administered on days 1–21 of a 21-day cycle, intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg on cycle 1 day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle, and intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29 and once every 4 weeks thereafter. Standard-of-care chemotherapy was administered as specified by the product label. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random sequence by means of an interactive web-response system and stratified by number of previous systemic therapies for advanced breast cancer and measurable versus non-measurable disease. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, first testing group A versus group C and, if this result was significant, then group B versus group C. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02675231 ) and is ongoing for long-term survival follow-up. Findings Between May 31, 2016, and Feb 28, 2018, 325 patients were screened, of whom 237 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups A (n=79), B (n=79), and C (n=79). Median follow-up was 19·0 months (IQR 14·7–25·1). The study met its primary endpoint, showing a significant difference at the prespecified two-sided α of 0·2 in median progression-free survival between group A (8·3 months, 95% CI 5·9–12·6) and group C (5·7 months, 5·4–7·0; HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·45–1·00]; p=0·051). No difference was observed between median progression-free survival in group B (5·7 months, 95% CI 4·2–7·2) and group C (HR 0·94 [0·64–1·38]; p=0·77). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse event in groups A, B, and C was neutropenia (21 [27%] of 78 patients, 17 [22%] of 77, and 19 [26%] of 72). The most common serious adverse events were: in group A, pyrexia (three [4%]), diarrhoea (two [3%]), urinary tract infection (two [3%]), and acute kidney injury (two [3%]); in group B, diarrhoea (two [3%]) and pneumonitis (two [3%]); and in group C, neutropenia (four [6%]) and pleural effusion (two [3%]). Two deaths were attributed to treatment: one due to pulmonary fibrosis in group B and one due to febrile neutropenia in group C. Interpretation The combination of abemaciclib, fulvestrant, and trastuzumab significantly improved progression-free survival versus standard-of-care chemotherapy plus trastuzumab while showing a tolerable safety profile. Our results suggest that a chemotherapy-free regimen might potentially be an alternative treatment option for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

e14520 Background: Mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors are highly sensitive to checkpoint blockade (CPB) in patients with metastatic disease regardless of tumor type. However, the efficacy of CPB in the adjuvant setting is unknown, especially since MMRd is considered a favorable biomarker for most resected tumor types. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be used to screen for patients at high risk for recurrence following surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy and identify patients (pts) that would most benefit from CPB. Methods: To assess the frequency of ctDNA in the resected MMRd population, we prospectively screened pts with MMRd tumors who completed standard perioperative chemotherapy and surgery (NCT03832569). DNA from resected tumors and matched postoperative plasma was sequenced for the presence of somatic mutations. Patients were considered to have minimal residual disease (MRD) when mutations were identified in tumor and found to be identical to those in matched plasma DNA. Somatic tissue mutations were assessed using MSK-IMPACT and ctDNA was assessed using FoundationOne, Guardant360 or MSK-ACCESS. Results: A total of 86 pts were screened for the presence of MRD. These represented 7 tumor types with colorectal (63%), endometrial (16%) and esophagogastric (13%) being the most common. The majority of pts were stage III (49%). MRD was detected in 18% of cases (14 of 79). Among the MRD negative group (n=62), only one pt developed disease recurrence. Three samples failed ctDNA analysis for technical reasons. Conclusions: MRD was identified in 18% of resected MMRd tumors using ctDNA analysis, suggesting this to be a feasible tumor agnostic approach to test the efficacy of CPB in a pts at high-risk for recurrence. Future studies will assess the impact of CPB in MRD positive MMRd tumors.[Table: see text]

Background: The combination of taxanes with trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) for first line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment per physician's choice with anti-HER2 therapy after second line therapy is associated with a median PFS of 3 months. While continued use of H in therapeutic combinations after progression on H-based therapy is common, the efficacy of continuing HP-based treatment after progression on P-based therapy is unknown. Methods: This is a single arm phase II trial of gemcitabine (G) with HP. Eligible patients had HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH ≥ 2.0) MBC with prior HP-based treatment and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies. Patients received G (1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a q 3 week (w) cycle, and H (8 mg/kg load → 6 mg/kg) and P (840 mg load → 420 mg) q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety and tolerability. An exploratory endpoint is to compare PFS by RECIST criteria versus 18-F FDG-PET response criteria. Using a Simon optimal 2-stage design, 21 patients were enrolled in stage 1. The successful 3-month PFS rate for stage 1 was set at 57% to allow accrual to stage 2 for a total of 45 patients. The study therapy will be considered successful if at least 27/45 (60%) patients are progression free at 3 months. Results: As of June 9, 2016, 28 patients are enrolled; 21 are evaluable at 3 months and 7 have not had 3-month evaluation. At 3 months, 16/21 (76%) are progression free; 5 patients have progressed. The 3 month-PFS results for evaluable patients will be updated. There are no cardiac or febrile neutropenic events to date. Initially, 5 of 22 (23%) patients required G dose reduction (4 due to grade 3 neutropenia and 1 due to grade 3 vomiting) and the study was amended to lower initial G dose to 1000 mg/m2. Conclusions: The preliminary 3 month-PFS is 76% (95% CI 55% to 89%) in evaluable patients, and updated data will be presented. These findings suggest clinical benefit when P is continued beyond progression. Citation Format: Iyengar NM, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh JC, Traina TA, DeFusco P, Dickler MN, Fornier MN, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Argolo D, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-34.

TPS6098 Background: Onapristone extended release (ER) is a type I full progesterone antagonist that inhibits progesterone mediated PR activation and stabilizes PR association with corepressors. Onapristone has shown activity across multiple preclinical models of hormonally driven cancer. A phase I dose escalation study of onapristone ER in PR+ breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer patients found all doses tested to be well tolerated, with 50mg PO BID determined to be the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). GCT (98% of cases PR+), LGSOC (58% of cases PR+) and EEC (67% of cases PR+) are hormonally driven cancers which generally have poor responses to chemotherapy and limited treatment options in the recurrent setting. Methods: This is an open-label, investigator-initiated basket study of onapristone ER in patients with PR+ recurrent GCT, LGSOC, or EEC currently enrolling patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in NY, USA (NCT03909152). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria, within 36 weeks of treatment. Eligible patients must have received at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy, have measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and have tumor tissue collected within 3 years prior to enrollment with PR expression ≥ 1% by IHC. Patients are allowed to have unlimited additional prior lines of chemotherapy, biologic therapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy. Enrolled patients are treated with onapristone ER 50mg PO BID until time of progression or intolerable toxicity. The 3 disease cohorts are currently enrolling to Stage I in parallel with expansion from stage I to stage II planned when the prespecified response criteria are met for each cohort as described in the table below. Clinical trial information: NCT03909152. [Table: see text]

Purpose: Advanced-stage endometrial cancers have limited treatment options and poor prognosis, highlighting the need to understand genetic drivers of therapeutic vulnerabilities and/or prognostic predictors. We examined whether prospective molecular characterization of recurrent and metastatic disease can reveal grade and histology-specific differences, facilitating enrollment onto clinical trials. Experimental Design: We integrated prospective clinical sequencing and IHC data with detailed clinical and treatment histories for 197 tumors, profiled by MSK-IMPACT from 189 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Results: Patients had advanced disease and high-grade histologies, with poor progression-free survival on first-line therapy (PFS1). When matched for histology and grade, the genomic landscape was similar to that of primary untreated disease profiled by TCGA. Using multiple complementary genomic and mutational signature-based methods, we identified patients with microsatellite instability (MSI), even when standard MMR protein IHC staining failed. Tumor and matched normal DNA sequencing identified rare pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA2 and MLH1. Clustering the pattern of DNA copy-number alterations revealed a novel subset characterized by heterozygous losses across the genome and significantly worse outcomes compared with other clusters (median PFS1 9.6 months vs. 17.0 and 17.4 months; P = 0.006). Of the 68% of patients harboring potentially actionable mutations, 27% were enrolled to matched clinical trials, of which 47% of these achieved clinical benefit. Conclusions: Prospective clinical sequencing of advanced endometrial cancer can help refine prognosis and aid treatment decision making by simultaneously detecting microsatellite status, germline predisposition syndromes, and potentially actionable mutations. A small overall proportion of all patients tested received investigational, genomically matched therapy as part of clinical trials.

Background Abemaciclib, an oral selective inhibitor of CDK4 & 6, showed efficacy & tolerability in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2- ABC. In preclinical models, inhibition of CDK4 & 6 by abemaciclib enhanced the activity of HER2-directed agents and re-sensitized resistant tumors to HER2 blockade, suggesting a crosstalk between HER2 signaling and the cyclin D1/CDK4 signaling pathways in HR+ tumors only. Methods monarcHER (NCT02675231), a phase II study, compared 3 treatment arms in pts with HR+, HER2+ ABC; arm A (abemaciclib 150mg PO Q12H Days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle + trastuzumab [T] IV infusion Day 1 of 21-day cycle + fulvestrant 500 mg IM Cycle 1 D1 and D15 and Cycle 2 D8, then Q4W), arm B (abemaciclib + T), vs arm C (T + investigator’s choice chemotherapy, 21-day cycle). Eligible pts were postmenopausal women, ≥2 HER2-directed therapies for ABC, prior T-DM1 and taxane, ECOG PS ≤ 1. 237 pts were randomized 1:1:1 and stratified by number of prior systemic regimens for ABC (2 to 3 vs > 3) and measurable vs nonmeasurable disease. The gated primary objective was to compare investigator assessed PFS of Arm A to C and, if positive, then B to C. Secondary objectives include: OS, objective response rate (ORR), safety, patient reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. Primary analysis was planned after approximately 165 PFS events, providing 80% power to detect superiority of Arm A over C, assuming a HR of .667 at 1-sided α = .1. Results Analysis was performed at 169 events. Median PFS was longer in Arm A vs C (HR [95% CI], 0.673 [0.451 – 1.003]; p = 0.0253; 8.3 vs 5.7 mo). No difference in Arm B vs C (HR [95% CI], 0.943 [0.643 – 1.383]; p = 0.385; 5.7 vs 5.7 mo). ORR was 35.4%, 16.5% and 22.8% in arms A, B, and C respectively. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) in Arms A, B, and C were neutropenia (26.9%, 22.1%, and 26.4%), leukopenia (10.3%, 2.6%, and 9.7%), thrombocytopenia (10.3%, 6.5%, and 2.8%), and diarrhea (9.0%, 6.5%, and 2.8%). AE-on treatment related deaths: 2 in arm A, 1 in B, and 1 in C. Conclusions The study met its primary endpoint of improved PFS in the ITT population in Arm A over Arm C. Safety data was similar to the known safety profile of abemaciclib. Clinical trial identification NCT02675231. Editorial acknowledgement Writing assistance was provided by Rachel Richardson. Legal entity responsible for the study Eli Lilly and Company. Funding Eli Lilly and Company. Disclosure S.M. Tolaney: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Eli Lilly and Company; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement : Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement : Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement : Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Genentech/Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Immunomedics ; Research grant / Funding (institution), Institutional Research Funds : Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution), Institutional Research Funds : Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Institutional Research Funds; honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Nanostring; Advisory / Consultancy, Honorarium; travel expense reimbursement : Puma; Research grant / Funding (institution), Institutional Research Funds: Cyclacel; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Honorarium: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Honorarium: Tesaro; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Honorarium; travel expense reimbursement: Celldex . A.M. Wardley: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Sponsorship for meetings: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZenaca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: NAPP; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: ACCORD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Athenex; Advisory / Consultancy: Gerson Lehman Group Guidepoint Global ; Advisory / Consultancy: Coleman Expert Network; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Sponsorship for meetings: Daiichi Sankyo; Officer / Board of Directors: Andrew Wardley LTD. J. Hilton: Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly and Company; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Officer / Board of Directors: BMS. T. Troso-Sandoval: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly and Company. S. Im: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Hanmi. S. Kim: Research grant / Funding (institution): Norvartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi-Genzyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dingkook Inc. S.R.D. Johnston: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astrazeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly and Company; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Puma Biotechnology; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai. S. Goel: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Lab funding and Clinical trial research support : Eli Lilly and Company; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Clinical trial research support: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 therapeutics. K. Catron: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Eli Lilly and Company. Z. Yang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Eli Lilly and Company. C. Gainford: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Eli Lilly and Company. F. Andre: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly and Company; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: GlaxoSmithKline; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

INTRODUCTION: Therapy with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors in ovarian cancer (OC) to date has demonstrated marginal benefit, calling for rational combinations. Vaccination against tumor-associated antigens (TAA's) is a potential strategy to increase therapeutic efficacy by enhancing immunogenicity. Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed in the majority of ovarian cancers (OC) and presents a compelling antigenic target for immunotherapy. TPIV200 is a GM-CSF-adjuvanted multi-epitope peptide anti-FRα vaccine targeting the most highly-antigenic moieties of FRα, which in recent phase I studies elicited durable immune response in over 90% of patients with ovarian and breast cancer. The current phase II study sought to examine whether a combination of TPIV200 with PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab would result in enhanced anti-tumor immunity and therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced platinum-resistant OC. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with platinum resistant or refractory OC were enrolled over a 10-month period. Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles. Patients were treated with TPIV200 and GM-CSF on day 1 for 6 cycles and durvalumab on days 1 and 15 at 10mg/kg for 12 cycles. Radiologic assessments were conducted every 12 weeks. Treatment was continued until completion, evidence of clinical or radiologic progression, intolerance, or withdrawal. Exploratory correlative endpoints included tissue microenvironment analyses, including expression of PD-L1 and FRα, and peripheral vaccine-specific immune responses. RESULTS: The study enrolled 27 women with advanced OC. Median age at enrollment was 64 (42-76). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-8). Of these patients, 85% (23) had high grade serous OC. There were no objective responses seen on the study. PFS rate at 24 weeks was 22%, with median PFS of 12 weeks. Six patients remained on treatment beyond 24 weeks. The majority of patients post-progression went on to receive subsequent standard therapy with durable clinical benefit. At the median follow up of 15.4 months, median OS was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: TPIV200/huFR-1 and durvalumab can be safely combined in heavily-pretreated patients with platinum-resistant OC. A subset of patients exhibited durable disease stabilization. Post-immunotherapy follow up was suggestive of improved clinical benefit from standard therapies, creating a rationale for exploration of these agents in combination with chemotherapy. Citation Format: Dmitriy Zamarin, Oladapo Yeku, Rosin E. O'Cearbhaill, Karen A. Cadoo, Jacqueline Gallagher, Sara Kravetz, Autumn McDonnell, Tiffany Troso-Sandoval, Paul Sabbatini, Stuart Lichtman, William Tew, Vicky Makker, Rachel N. Grisham, David M. Hyman, Carol Aghajanian, Jason Konner. A PHASE 2 STUDY OF TPIV200/HUFR-1 (A MULTI-EPITOPE FOLATE RECEPTOR ALPHA VACCINE) IN COMBINATION WITH DURVALUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PLATINUM RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr AP27.

5513 Background: Adavosertib (AZD1775; A), a highly selective WEE1 inhibitor, demonstrated activity and tolerability in combination with carboplatin (C) in primary PROC. This study (NCT02272790) assessed the objective response rate (ORR) and safety of A in PROC. Methods: Pts with recurrent RECIST v1.1 measurable PROC received A with C, gemcitabine (G), weekly paclitaxel (P), or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in 3- (C) or 4-week (G, P, PLD) cycles (Table). Tumor assessments were performed every 2 cycles until disease progression. Primary objective: ORR; other objectives: disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: In the 94 pts treated (median treatment duration 3 months; range 0–16 months), outcomes were greatest with A (weeks [W]1–3) + C (Table), with ORR of 67% and median PFS (mPFS) of 10.1 months for this cohort. Most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are shown in the Table, with hematologic toxicity most notable with A (W1–3) + C. TEAEs led to A dose interruptions, reductions and discontinuations in 63%, 30% and 13% of the whole cohort, respectively. A possible positive relationship between CCNE1 amplification and response warrants further investigation. Conclusions: A shows preliminary efficacy when combined with CT. Pts receiving A (W1–3) + C showed greatest benefit. The increased but not unexpected hematologic toxicity is a challenge and could be further studied to optimize the dose schedule and supportive medications. Clinical trial information: NCT02272790. [Table: see text]

5582 Background: Monoclonal antibodies Durvalumab (D) and Tremelimumab (T) inhibit binding of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) to PD1 and inhibit activation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), respectively, resulting in improved tumor immunosurveillance. There is rationale to study D and DT based on recent genomic and tumor microenvironment evaluation of endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were randomized to D or DT. Pts received D 1500 mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (wks). DT therapy pts received D 1500 mg IV every 4 wks and T 75 mg IV every 4 wks for 4 cycles, followed by D 1500 mg IV every 4 wks until progression or unacceptable toxicities. Pts were stratified by histology with 10 carcinosarcoma or MSI-H EC pts per arm. Efficacy assessments were every 8 wks and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed per CTCAE v.4.03. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Descriptive statistics and 90% one sided CI are reported. Progression free survival (PFS) rate at 24 wks (PFS24wks) was estimated by Kaplan Meier method. Results: At planned interim analysis, 56 pts were enrolled (28 per arm). 15 pts: carcinosarcoma, 15 pts: endometrioid (3: Gr1), 14 pts: serous, and 12 pts: other histology. 5(9%) pts: MSI-H, 48(86%) pts: microsatellite stable (MSS), 3(5%): unknown. 2 pts were excluded due to early death. 27 pts per arm were evaluable for efficacy. In the D arm: 1 pt had complete response (CR)(MSS) and 3 pts had a partial response (PR) (2:MSS, 1:MSI-H) with an ORR of 14.8% (CI: 6.6-100%). The median PFS was 7.6 wks and PFS24wks was 13.3% (CI 6.1-100%). Median duration of response (DOR) was 16 wks in the D arm. In the DT arm, 2 pts achieved CR (1:MSI-H, 1:MSS) and 1 had PR (MSS). The ORR was 11.1% (CI: 4.2-100%). Median PFS was 8.1 wks, PFS24wks was 18.5% (CI 10.1-100%) and DOR was 8 wks. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 2 (7%) pts in D and 9 (32%) pts in DT. Grade 4 TRAEs occurred 1 (4%) pt in D and 3 (11%) pts in DT. 2 pts discontinued due to a TRAE. Most common TRAEs in total were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (14%), vomiting (13%) and pruritis (11%). Conclusions: D and DT show modest activity in EC. No new safety signals were identified. Second stage accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03015129.

We previously reported progression-free survival (PFS) results on a phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated in the first- and second-line setting. Here, we report results for overall survival (OS) and updated PFS after an additional year of follow-up. Patients with HER2-positive MBC with 0-1 prior treatment were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly, and trastuzumab (loading dose 8 mg/kg → 6 mg/kg) and pertuzumab (loading dose 840 mg → 420 mg) every 3 weeks, all given intravenously. Primary endpoint was 6-month PFS. Secondary endpoints included median PFS, 6-month and median OS. Evaluable patients received at least one full dose of treatment. From January 2011 to December 2013, 69 patients were enrolled: 51 (74 %) and 18 (26 %) treated in first- and second-line metastatic settings, respectively. As of July 1, 2015, the median follow-up was 33 months (range 3-49 months; 67 patients were evaluable for efficacy). The median OS was 44 months (95 % CI 37.5-NR) overall and 44 months (95 % CI 38.3-NR) and 37.5 months (95 % CI 30.3-NR) for patients with 0 and 1 prior metastatic treatment, respectively; 6-month OS was 98 % (95 % CI 90-1). The 6-month PFS was 86 % (95 % CI 75-93) overall and 89 % (95 % CI 76-95) and 78 % (95 % CI 51-91) for patients with 0 and 1 prior therapy, respectively; and median PFS was 21.4 months (95 % CI 14.1-NR) overall and 25.7 months (95 % CI 14.1-NR) and 16.9 months (95 % CI 8.5-NR) for patients with 0-1 prior treatment, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. Updated analysis demonstrates that weekly paclitaxel, when added to trastuzumab and pertuzumab, is associated with a favorable OS and PFS and offers an alternative to docetaxel-based therapy. http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0127604.

Purpose Dose-dense (dd) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (P) is superior to every 3-weekly AC followed by P. Given the demonstrated cardiac safety for trastuzuamb (T) with conventionally scheduled AC followed by P, we tested the safety of dd AC followed by P with T. The primary end point was cardiac safety, and the secondary end points were time to recurrence and overall survival. Methods Patients with HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-amplified breast cancer and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥ 55% were enrolled, regardless of tumor size or nodal status. Treatment consisted of AC (60/600 mg/m2) × 4 followed by P (175 mg/m2) × 4 every 2-weekly with pegfilgrastim (6 mg on day 2) + T ×1 year. LVEF by radionuclide scan was obtained at baseline, at months 2, 6, 9, and 18. Results From January 2005 to November 2005, 70 patients were enrolled. The median age was 49 years (range, 27 to 72 years); median LVEF at baseline was 68% (range, 55% to 81%). At month 2 in 70 of 70 patients, the median LVEF was 67% (range, 58% to 79%); at month 6 in 67 of 70 patients, it was 66% (range, 52% to 75%); at month 9 in 68 of 70 patients, it was 65% (range, 50% to 75%); and at month 18 in 48 of 70 patients, it was 66% (range, 57% to 75%). As of December 1, 2007, the median follow-up was 28 months (range, 25 to 35 months). One patient (1%) experienced conestive heart failure (CHF). There were no cardiac deaths. Conclusion Dose-dense AC followed by P/T followed by T is feasible and is not likely to increase the incidence of cardiac events compared to established regimens.

Purpose To determine the immediate and long-term effects of true acupuncture versus sham acupuncture on hot flash frequency in women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods Seventy-two women with breast cancer experiencing three or more hot flashes per day were randomly assigned to receive either true or sham acupuncture. Interventions were given twice weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. Hot flash frequency was evaluated at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months after initiation of treatment. Patients initially randomly assigned to the sham group were crossed over to true acupuncture starting at week 7. Results The mean number of hot flashes per day was reduced from 8.7 (standard deviation [SD], 3.9) to 6.2 (SD, 4.2) in the true acupuncture group and from 10.0 (SD, 6.1) to 7.6 (SD, 5.7) in the sham group. True acupuncture was associated with 0.8 fewer hot flashes per day than sham at 6 weeks, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (95% CI, −0.7 to 2.4; P = .3). When participants in the sham acupuncture group were crossed over to true acupuncture, a further reduction in the frequency of hot flashes was seen. This reduction in hot flash frequency persisted for up to 6 months after the completion of treatment. Conclusion Hot flash frequency in breast cancer patients was reduced following acupuncture. However, when compared with sham acupuncture, the reduction by the acupuncture regimen as provided in the current study did not reach statistical significance. We cannot exclude the possibility that a longer and more intense acupuncture intervention could produce a larger reduction of these symptoms.

Background Dual anti-HER2 therapy is effective for HER2-amplified breast cancer. Weekly paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and full-dose lapatinib (PTL) is not feasible because of grade 3 diarrhea. We conducted a phase II feasibility study of dose-dense (DD; every other week) PTL ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01827163 ). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had HER2-positive breast cancer, tumor size ≤ 3 cm, and negative nodes. Treatment included paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 × 4, every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim), trastuzumab (4 mg/kg load and then 2 mg/kg weekly), and lapatinib (1000 mg daily). After paclitaxel × 4, trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus lapatinib were continued for 1 year. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as (1) > 80% of patients completing PTL without a dose delay or reduction, (2) grade 3 diarrhea rate Results From May 2013 to November 2013, we enrolled 20 of 55 planned patients. The median age was 49 years (range, 34-74 years). One patient had immediate paclitaxel hypersensitivity and was deemed inevaluable. Only 13 of 19 evaluable patients (68%) completed PTL without a dose delay or reduction or unacceptable toxicities. Only 3 of 19 (16%) had grade 3 diarrhea. Rash was frequent, with all grades in 18 of 19 (95%) and grade 3 in 2 of 19 (11%). The study was stopped early because of excess toxicity. Conclusion The discontinuation rate during DD PTL was high, owing, in part, to an unexpectedly high incidence of rash. The trial was halted, because the initial discontinuation rate from overall toxicity made it unlikely that full accrual would demonstrate feasibility.

1037 Background: The combination of taxanes with HP for first line treatment of HER2-positive MBC is associated with improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment per physician’s choice with anti-HER2 therapy after second line therapy is associated with a median PFS of 3 months. While continued use of H in therapeutic combinations after progression on H-based therapy is standard, the efficacy of continuing HP-based treatment after progression on P-based therapy is unknown. Methods: This is a single arm phase II trial of G with HP. Eligible patients (pts) had HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH > 2.0) MBC with prior HP-based treatment and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies. Pts received G (1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a q 3 week (w) cycle, and H (8 mg/kg load → 6 mg/kg) and P (840 mg load → 420 mg) q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety and tolerability. An exploratory endpoint is to compare PFS by RECIST criteria versus 18-F FDG-PET response criteria. The study therapy will be considered successful if at least 27/45 (60%) patients are progression free at 3 months. Results: As of 1-27-17, 41 of 45 pts are enrolled; 34 are evaluable at 3 months and 7 have not had 3-month evaluation. At 3 months, 26/34 (76%) are progression free (1 CR, 8 PR, 17 SD); 8 pts progressed. There are no cardiac or febrile neutropenic events to date. 4 pts required G dose reduction (3 grade 3 neutropenia and 1 grade 3 vomiting) and the study was amended to lower initial G dose to 1000 mg/m2. Conclusions: The preliminary 3 month-PFS is 76% in evaluable pts (95% CI 60% to 88%). The updated 3 month-PFS results will be presented. Continuation of P beyond progression is associated with apparent clinical benefit. A randomized trial is justified to confirm this clinically important observation. Clinical trial information: NCT02252887.

TPS5602Background: Approximately 75% of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) present with advanced disease. The majority of these women will ultimately recur and require life-long treatment fo...

Cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) is a proven adjuvant option for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Randomized trials with other regimens demonstrate that dose-dense (DD) scheduling can offer greater efficacy. We investigated the feasibility of administering CMF using a DD schedule.Thirty-eight patients with early-stage breast cancer were accrued from March 2008 through June 2008. They were treated every 14 days with C 600, M 40, F 600 (all mg/m2) with PEG-filgrastim (Neulasta®) support on day 2 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was tolerability using a Simon's 2-stage optimal design. The design would effectively discriminate between true tolerability (as protocol-defined) rates of ≤ 60% and ≥ 80%.The median age was 52-years-old (range, 38-78 years of age). Twenty-nine of the 38 patients completed 8 cycles of CMF at 14-day intervals.Dose-dense adjuvant CMF is tolerable and feasible at 14-day intervals with PEG-filgrastim support.

Purpose We conducted a pilot study of dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) × 6 → paclitaxel (P) × 6 with pegfilgrastim. A previous dose-dense trial of FEC (5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/EC) × 6 with filgrastim → by weekly paclitaxel alternating with docetaxel × 18 was not feasible because of pneumonitis (with dose-dense FEC) and pericardial/pleural effusion (taxane phase). Dose-dense EC (without the 5-FU) is not associated with pneumonitis, and dose-dense paclitaxel (alone) is feasible. Primary objective was feasibility. Patients and Methods Patients with resectable breast cancer were enrolled, regardless of surgery status, tumor size, or nodal status. Treatment regimen consisted of every-2-week EC (100/600 mg/m 2 ) × 6 → by 2-weekly P (175 mg/m 2 ) × 6 with pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2. Results Between November 2004 and May 2005, 38 patients were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (range, 30-72 years); 33 of 38 (87%) were treated in the adjuvant setting and 27 of 33 (81%) had involved nodes (range, 1-46); 5 of 38 (13%) were treated pre-operatively; 33 of 38 (87%) completed all chemotherapy as planned; the remaining patients (13%) had treatment modifications for toxicity. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 6 of 38 patients (16 %) and only during EC. There were 12 hospitalizations in 9 of 38 patients (24%) enrolled. Conclusion Dose-dense every-2-week EC × 6 → P × 6 with pegfilgrastim is feasible based on our prospective definition.

607 Background: We previously reported results of the phase II breast cancer (BC) trial of weekly paclitaxel (T), trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) with its primary endpoint of 6-month (mo) progre...

590 Background: CMF (C 600 mg/m2, M 40 mg/m2, F 600 mg/m2) is an option for adjuvant therapy for patients with low risk early stage breast cancer. DD regimens as predicted by mathematical models of cancer growth and treatment response are superior. We previously demonstrated the safety of DD EC (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel at 10–11 day (d) intervals. We investigated the feasibility of administering DD adjuvant CMF every 14 d and then every 10–11 d in a 2-stage phase II trial. Methods: An initial cohort (A) was treated q 14 d with PEG-filgrastim (Neulasta) support. A second cohort (B) was treated every 10–11 d with filgrastim/Neupogen x 5 d and then, based on feasibility, modified (cohort C) to use 7 d filgrastim. The primary end point was feasibility defined as having ANC > 1.5 x 103/uL on day 1 of planned treatment for all 8 cycles with no grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity. All three cohorts were tested using a Simon's two-stage optimal design with type I and type II errors set at 10%. This design would effectively discriminate between true tolerability (as protocol-defined) rates of< 60% and> 80%. Cohort A: 38 pts with early stage breast cancer were accrued from 3/2008 though 6/2008. Cohort B: 7 pts were accrued from June 2008 through August 2008. Cohort C: Is still open with 16 pts accrued from August 2008 through December 5, 2008. Results: Median age 51: range 38 to 78. Cohort A: 29/38 pts completed 8 cycles of CMF. The regimen was considered feasible. 2 other pts completed 7 cycles and were withdrawn for depression and grade 2 transaminitis. The 7 other pts completed between 1 and 6 cycles of CMF were withdrawn as follows: 3 personal, 1 (grade 3) bone pain, 2 allergy unrelated to CMF, and 1 seizure. Cohort B: 7 pts were accrued. 6 out of 7 pts could not complete 8 cycles of chemotherapy secondary to neutropenia and 1 secondary to grade 3 ALT elevation. Cohort C: Accrual has not been completed. 16 pts are currently enrolled. Conclusions: Dose dense adjuvant CMF is feasible at 14 d intervals with PEG-filgrastim support. Adjuvant CMF every 10–11 days with filgrastim given for 5 days beginning day 2 is not feasible. Accrual is ongoing for CMF at 10–11 days with filgrastim x 7 days. Updated results will be available for Cohort C. [Table: see text]

582 Background: DD q 2 weekly (w) AC → T is superior to conventionally scheduled (cs) AC → T and safe w/long follow-up (Hudis et al, SABCS 2005). With q 3 wk AC, adjuvant (adj) H is safe and effective (Romond et al and Perez et al, NEJM 2005). We therefore tested DD q 2 w AC → T + H × 1 year (y) as adj treatment (Rx) of patients (pts) with HER2/neu (+) BCA to determine cardiac safety. Based on the reported cardiac event (CE) rate of ≤ 4% in the randomized trials using cs chemotherapy (CRx) + H, we evaluated DD q 2 w AC → T + H with a 1° endpoint of cardiac safety defined as discontinuation (DC) of H due to 1) cardiac death or 2) congestive heart failure (CHF). The 2° endpoint is time to recurrence and overall survival. Methods: Pts with HER2/Neu IHC 3+ or FISH-amplified BCA were enrolled, regardless of tumor size or nodal status. Rx consisted of AC at 60/600 mg/m2 × 4 → T at 175 mg/m2 × 4 q 2 w w/pegfilgrastim 6 mg on d 2 + H × 1 y. Multi-gated radionuclide angiography scan (MUGA) is obtained at baseline and at months (mo) 2 (after AC × 4), 6 (after T × 4), 9, and 18. Pts w/baseline LVEF of ≥ 55% and w/o cardiac illnesses are eligible. Pts w/significant (sig) asymptomatic (asx) LVEF ↓ after DD AC based on mo 2 MUGA did not receive H, and pts w/sig asx LVEF ↓ during H had it DC’d. If the CE rate is > 4%, Rx is deemed not feasible. Results: From January 4, 2005 to November 1, 2005, 70 pts were enrolled. Median (med) age is 49 years (range, 27–72). Forty one of 70 pts (60%) had node (+) BC and 27/70 pts (40%) had (-) nodes. Med baseline LVEF is 68% (range, 55%-81%). As of January 9, 2005, all pts had mo 2 MUGA after DD AC and there is no sig LVEF ↓ and the med LVEF is 67% (range, 58%-79%). To date 39 pts had mo 6 MUGA w/med LVEF of 66% (range, 56%-75%) and one pt had a sig asx LVEF ↓ from baseline of 74% to 56%; H was DC’d. Twenty-three pts had mo 9 MUGA w/a med LVEF of 64% (range, 57%-69%). One patient had clinical CHF at mo 4 w/EF of 45% and improved sig w/cardiac medications. One had pneumonitis during radiation (RT). One had atrial fibrillation w/pericarditis after completion of RT. Discussion: DD AC → T + H appears to have an acceptable cardiac toxicity profile w/1/70 pts having a CE. Updated cardiac safety data will be presented. [Table: see text]

633 Background: We previously demonstrated that weekly T + HL after anthracycline based therapy was not feasible due to high incidence of grade (G) 3 diarrhea, which led to modification of the ALTT...

Abstract #2108 Background: DD q 2 weekly (w) AC → P + T x 1 year (y) has an acceptable safely profile w/ congestive heart failure (CHF) rate of 1/70 pts (Dang, JCO 2008). Lapatinib (L) is effective in HER2 (+) BC. We conducted a pilot study of dd AC → w P + T + L to determine its feasibility and cardiac safety. Methods: Enrolled pts had HER2 (+) BC; LVEF > 50%. Rx consisted of AC at 60/600 mg/m2 x 4 q 2 w (w/ pegfilgrastim 6 mg day 2) → P at 80 mg/m2 x 12 q w + T x 1 y; L (1000 mg daily beginning w/ P + T and continued x 1 y). MUGA is obtained at baseline and at months (mo) 2, 6, 9, and 18. Rx is considered feasible if 1) > 80% pts can complete the PTL phase without a dose delay or reduction and 2) the cardiac event rate (CHF or cardiac death) is < 4%. Pts can remain on-Rx w/ one dose reduction of L (1000 mg → 750 mg) for a G 3 event or < G 3 toxicity (unacceptable). Results: From March 2007 to April 2008, we enrolled 95 pts. Median (med) age was 45 years (range, 28-73). At a med follow-up of 7 months, 90 are evaluable. Of the 90 pts, 34 (37%) withdrew from study during the PTL phase; 29 for a 2nd event of G 3 or unacceptable < G 3 toxicities (15 G 3 diarrhea, 4 G 1/2 diarrhea, 1 G 3 rash, 2 G 2 rash, 1 G 3 dyspnea and also had G 3 diarrhea, 1 G 3 ↑QTc also had G 3 diarrhea, 1 G 3 ↑ALT also had G 3 diarrhea, 1 G 3 paronychia, 1 G 3 pneumonitis, 1 asymptomatic LVEF ↓, 1 myocarditis) and 5 for other reasons (2 personal reason, 1 PCP pneumonia, 1 progression, 1 P hypersensitivity). Overall, 25/90 (27%) pts had G 3 diarrhea and 31/90 (34%) pts required a dose reduction of lapatinib. Med LVEF at baseline is 67% (N=95), at mo 2 is 68% (N=90), at mo 6 is 65% (N=53), and mo 9 is 65% (N=28). To date there are no patient drop-outs due to significant LVEF declines after dd AC; one patient dropped during PTL out due to an asymptomatic LVEF decline. Discussion: L at 1000 mg/day is not feasible combined w/ weekly P and T by protocol stipulation (> 20% pts required L dose reduction) primarily due to excessive G 3 diarrhea. These results have led to the modification of Design 2 (Arm D) of ALTTO. We will report updated results. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2108.