Search

Overview The use of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy to treat severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure is increasing worldwide. We reported herein the use of veno-venous ECMO in a patient with cold agglutinin haemolytic anaemia (CAHA) who suffered from severe COVID-19 infection. Description A 64-year-old man presented to the emergency department (ED) with incremental complaints of dyspnoea and cough since one week. His history consisted of CAHA, which responded well to corticosteroid treatment. Because of severe hypoxemia, urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation were necessary. Despite deep sedation, muscle paralysis and prone ventilation, P/F ratio remained low. Though his history of CAHA, he still was considered for VV-ECMO. As lab results pointed to recurrence of CAHA, corticosteroids and rituximab were started. The VV-ECMO run was short and rather uncomplicated. Although, despite treatment, CAHA persisted and caused important complications of intestinal ischemia, which needed multiple surgical interventions. Finally, the patient suffered from progressive liver failure, thought to be secondary to ischemic cholangitis. One month after admission, therapy was stopped and patient passed away. Conclusion Our case report shows that CAHA is no contraindication for VV-ECMO, even when both titre and thermal amplitude are high. Although, the aetiology of CAHA and its response to therapy will determine the final outcome of those patients.

Introduction: Despite advances in heart failure therapies and percutaneous coronary interventions, survival for cardiogenic shock remains poor. Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVAD) are increasingly used, but current evidence remains conflicting. The Impella is an example of such a device, based on a catheter mounted micro-axial continuous flow pump, that has been rapidly adopted in routine practice. An important aspect of postimplantation care is the prevention of complications. Hemolysis is one of the most frequent complications seen with this device. Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of hemolysis in patients supported with a pVAD. A practical algorithm for rapid identification of hemolysis and the underlying cause is presented, allowing for early treatment and prevention of further complications. Expert opinion: Hemolysis remains a threat to patients supported with any mechanical circulatory support device. Prevention as well as treatment demands for sufficient knowledge about the device, the optimal position, and hemodynamics. Future studies should try to clarify some of the elements that are still unclear, such as optimal anticoagulation, the location of pentoxifylline, or extracorporeal removal of free hemoglobin. This could help to optimize outcomes in clinical practice as well as future studies.

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of COVID-19, so that the importance of adequate in-hospital thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is well established. However, the incidence of VTE after discharge and whether postdischarge thromboprophylaxis is beneficial and safe are unclear. In this prospective observational single-center study, we report the incidence of VTE 6 weeks after hospitalization and the use of postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. Methods Patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 were invited to a multidisciplinary follow-up clinic 6 weeks after discharge. D-dimer and C-reactive protein were measured, and all patients were screened for deep vein thrombosis with venous duplex-ultrasound. Additionally, selected high-risk patients received computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or ventilation–perfusion (V/Q) scan to screen for incidental pulmonary embolism. Results Of 485 consecutive patients hospitalized from March through June 2020, 146 patients were analyzed, of which 39% had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Postdischarge thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 28% of patients, but was used more frequently after ICU stay (61%) and in patients with higher maximal D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels during hospitalization. Six weeks after discharge, elevated D-dimer values were present in 32% of ward and 42% of ICU patients. Only one asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (0.7%) and one symptomatic pulmonary embolism (0.7%) were diagnosed with systematic screening. No bleedings were reported. Conclusion In patients who had been hospitalized with COVID-19, systematic screening for VTE 6 weeks after discharge revealed a low incidence of VTE. A strategy of selectively providing postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients seems safe and potentially effective.

The use of mechanical circulatory support for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock is rapidly increasing. Currently, there is only limited and conflicting evidence available regarding the role of the Impella (a microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term, left or right ventricular assist device) in cardiogenic shock; further randomized trials are needed. Patient selection, timing of implantation, and post-implantation management in the cardiac intensive care unit are crucial elements for success. Particular challenges at the bedside include the practical management of anticoagulation, evaluation of correct device position, and the approach to use in a patient with signs of insufficient hemodynamic support. Profound knowledge of these issues is required to enable the maximal potential of the device. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the short-term assist device and describes a practical approach to optimize care for patients supported with the device.

Background Eosinophilic myocarditis is a rare form of myocardial inflammatory disease. Eosinophilic infiltration of the myocardium is often the consequence of a systemic disorder but can remain unexplained in up to a third of patients. The disease course can range from mild to fulminant myocarditis and mortality remains high for fulminant cases. Case summary A 42-year-old male was admitted for cardiogenic shock. He presented in another hospital with fever, low blood pressure, diffuse electrocardiogram-abnormalities, and elevated troponin T (4.5 µg/L; reference Discussion This case demonstrates the usefulness of myocardial biopsy in fulminant myocarditis since the only histopathology guided us towards the diagnosis of eosinophilic myocarditis. Treatment with methylprednisone and an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor resulted in rapid improvement. Awake mechanical circulatory support with the ImpellaTM device proved feasible and might have helped by unloading the left ventricle, as was reflected in an immediate decrease in troponin levels, even before methylprednisone initiation.

Background Bleeding and ischemic complications are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill cardiogenic shock patients, supported by short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices. Hence, finding the optimal antithrombotic regimen is challenging. Bleeding not only occurs because of heparin and antiplatelet therapy (both required in the prevention of pump and acute stent thrombosis) but also because of device- and disease related coagulopathy. To prevent clotting-related device failure, most centers target full therapeutic heparin anticoagulation levels in left ventricular (LV) Impella™ supported patients in analogy with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. We aimed to investigate the safety (related to bleeding and thrombotic complications) of targeting low-dose versus therapeutic heparin levels in left Impella™-supported cardiogenic shock patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods In this hypothesis generating pilot study, we investigated 114 patients supported for at least two days by LV Impella™ mechanical support due to cardiogenic shock at three tertiary ICUs, highly specialized in mechanical support. Low-dose heparin (aPTT 40–60s or anti-Xa 0.2–0.3) was compared to standard of care (aPTT 60–80s or anti-Xa 0.3–0.5). Major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack) and BARC bleeding (bleeding academic research consortium classification) during 30 day follow-up were assessed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was calculated with age, gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, chronic kidney disease, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary arterial bypass grafting, hypercholesterolemia and DAPT as matching variables. COX regression analysis was conducted to test for robustness. Results IPTW revealed 52 patients in the low-dose heparin group and 62 patients in the therapeutic group. Mean age of patients after IPTW was 62±16 years in the intermediate and 62±13 years in the therapeutic group (p=0.99). 25% and 42.2% were male (p=0.92). Overall bleeding events and major (BARC3b) bleeding events were higher in the therapeutic heparin group (overall bleeding: Hazard ratio [HR]=2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–5.5; p=0.015; BARC 3b: HR=4.4, 95% CI 1.4–13.6, p=0.009). Minor bleeding (BARC3a) as well as MACCE and its single components (ischemic events) did not differ between both groups. These findings were robust in the COX regression analysis. Conclusion In this pilot analysis, low-dose heparin in 114 LV Impella™ cardiogenic shock patients was associated with less bleeding without increased ischemic events, adjusted for DAPT. Reducing the target heparin levels in critically ill patients supported by LV Impella™ might improve the outcome of this precarious group. These findings need to be validated in randomized clinical trials. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Acute mitral regurgitation (MR) is an emergency, often requiring urgent surgery. Severe acute MR presenting with hemodynamic collapse is usually caused by papillary muscle rupture or dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or chordal rupture, resulting in flail mitral leaflet(s). Preoperative stabilization is complex due to concomitant hemodynamic collapse and hypoxic respiratory failure. Finding the right balance between both preload and inotropic support is challenging. When patients are too sick for immediate surgical intervention, mechanical circulatory support can be considered because of its ability to both unload and reduce of cardiac work while increasing coronary perfusion and cardiac output. Nevertheless, even after initial stabilization, surgical risk remains high in critically ill acute severe MR patients and transcatheter treatments such as MitraClip are increasingly being explored. Methods Between August 2017 and September 2019, patients presenting with acute severe mitral regurgitation and considered too ill for immediate surgical intervention (EURO-II score >11.2% plus pulmonary oedema necessitating mechanical ventilation and/or hemodynamic instability), were selected for an Impella-assisted LV unloading technique as bridge to MitraClip-procedure. Five patients were selected for the combined left Impella/MitraClip-procedure in two tertiary cardiac ICUs. Results The mean age was 72 years. The cause of MR was ischemic in 20% and all patients presented in cardiogenic shock state, necessitating mechanical ventilation. The overall cardiac operative risk assessment (Euro-II) score predicted a 35% chance of in-hospital mortality. Cardiac output was severely impaired (mean LVOT VTI 8.2 cm). All patients were on inotropic support and supported by an Impella-CP pVAD (mean flow 2.5 Liter per minute; mean 6.3 days of support). In all cases, we managed to reduce the LVEDP below 15 mmHg using the combination of medical therapy (afterload reduction, inotropes), mechanical ventilation and pVAD-therapy. The MR was significantly reduced by a MitraClip-procedure in each Impella supported patient. The overall survival at discharge was 80%. One patient with late referral and multiple organ failure at presentation deceased due to refractory cardiogenic shock. Overall, severe MR was reduced to grade 1+ and all four patients survived 6 months after discharge with only one readmission for decompensated heart failure. Conclusions A combined strategy of Impella and MitraClip appears to be a novel, feasible alternative for patients presenting with acute, severe MR unable to proceed to a corrective surgical procedure at presentation due to severe left ventricular forward flow failure. In these cases, the early initiation of pVAD-support may reduce the risk of development of irreversible end- organ damage and dysfunction. Exploration in a larger, randomised population is warranted to investigate this strategy further. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Bleeding is a main cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill cardiogenic shock patients, supported by short-term percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices. Bleeding not only occurs because of obligatory heparin and antiplatelet therapy (both required in the prevention of pump and stent thrombosis) but possibly also results from device-related coagulopathy. Similar to long-term ventricular assist devices, mechanical shear-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) might further increase the bleeding risk. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of left Impella percutaneous continuous flow pumps on the development of AVWS due to shear-induced excessive cleavage of large vWF multimers by the metalloproteinase ADAMTS-13, resulting in loss of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers. Methods Between March 2019 and January 2020, all cardiogenic shock patients supported by a left Impella and referred to a single tertiary ICU were studied. Both vWF Antigen (vWF:Ag) and vWF:GPIbR (ristocetin-induced binding of vWF to a recombinant wildtype Glycoprotein Ib fragment) levels were measured by chemiluminescent immunoassays using an AcuStar (Werfen) assay to determine the vWF:GPIbR /vWF:Ag ratio (normal range ≥1.0). VWF multimer analysis was performed by electrophoresis. On-pump analyses were performed 12h after implantation and off-pump analyses 12h after Impella explantation. Patients who died on-pump were excluded because of lack of paired data after explantation. Results Eight left Impella patients (four Impella CP, four Impella 5.0) were analyzed for AVWS. The vWF:GPIbR /vWF:Ag ratio was Conclusions Our data highlight the rapid onset and reversal of AVWS in all studied cardiogenic shock patients, supported by a left Impella pump. The determination of the GPIbR /vWF:Ag ratio with the AcuStar appears a reliable and faster test to detect AVWS as compared to vWF multimers electrophoresis. Further research into innovative pharmacological interventions (e.g. ADAMTS-13 inhibitors) should target pMCS-induced AVWS in an effort to reduce hemostatic complications in this critically ill ICU population. AVWS in Impella supported patients Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

The use of mechanical circulatory support for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock is rapidly increasing. Currently, there is only limited and conflicting evidence available regarding the role of the Impella (a microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term, left or right ventricular assist device) in cardiogenic shock; further randomized trials are needed. Patient selection, timing of implantation, and post-implantation management in the cardiac intensive care unit are crucial elements for success. Particular challenges at the bedside include the practical management of anticoagulation, evaluation of correct device position, and the approach to use in a patient with signs of insufficient hemodynamic support. Profound knowledge of these issues is required to enable the maximal potential of the device. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the short-term assist device and describes a practical approach to optimize care for patients supported with the device.

Aims Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to acute, severe mitral regurgitation (MR) are often considered too ill for immediate surgical intervention. Therefore, other less invasive techniques for haemodynamic stabilization should be explored. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate the feasibility and outcomes in patients with CS due to severe MR by using a novel approach combining haemodynamic stabilization with left Impella-support plus MR-reduction using MitraClip®. Methods and results We analysed whether a combined left Impella®/MitraClip®-procedure in a rare population of CS-patients with acute MR requiring mechanical ventilation is a feasible strategy to recovery in patients who had been declined cardiac surgery. Six INTERMACS-1 CS-patients with acute MR were studied at two tertiary cardiac intensive care units. The mean EURO-II score was 39 ± 19% and age 66.8 ± 4.9 years. All patients had an initial pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mmHg and pulmonary oedema necessitating invasive ventilation. Cardiac output was severely impaired (left ventricular outflow tract velocity time index 9.8 ± 1.8 cm), requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (Impella®-CP; mean flow 2.9 ± 1.8 L per minute; mean support 9.7 ± 6.0 days). Despite MCS-guided unloading, weaning from ventilation failed due to persisting pulmonary oedema necessitating MR-reduction. In all cases, the severe MR was reduced to mild using percutaneous MitraClip®-procedure, followed by successful weaning from invasive ventilation. Survival to discharge was 86%, with all surviving and rare readmission for heart failure at 6 months. Conclusions A combined Impella®/MitraClip®-strategy appears a novel, feasible alternative for weaning CS-patients presenting with acute, severe MR. Upfront Impella®-stabilization facilitates safe bridging to Mitraclip®-procedure and the staged approach facilitates successful weaning from ventilatory support.

ispartof: RHEUMATOLOGY vol:59 issue:7 pages:1775-1777 ispartof: location:England status: published

ispartof: CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE vol:13 issue:5 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The Impella CP device (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) is being increasingly used in patients presenting with (acute) cardiogenic shock but also electively in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Upfront use of the Impella has been Food and Drug Administration