1. Comparative Study Between Doubly Salient PM Machine With New Stator/Rotor-Pole Number Combination and Biased Flux PM Machine
- Author
-
Guangqiang Ming, Tingbin Li, Liu Zhang, Wenpeng Zheng, Lijian Wu, and Youtong Fang
- Subjects
010302 applied physics ,Physics ,Stator ,Rotor (electric) ,020208 electrical & electronic engineering ,Torque density ,Cogging torque ,02 engineering and technology ,Counter-electromotive force ,01 natural sciences ,Flux linkage ,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering ,law.invention ,Control and Systems Engineering ,Control theory ,law ,0103 physical sciences ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Torque ,Torque ripple ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Abstract
This article compares the doubly salient permanent magnet machine (DSPMM) having 18/13-pole number combination with 18/17-pole biased flux permanent magnet machine (BFPMM) to verify its improvement in torque characteristics. In such DSPMM, the stator/rotor-pole number combination is 18/13 rather than the conventional one (i.e., 18/12) to achieve balanced three phases, sinusoidal phase flux linkage and back electromotive force (back EMF), small cogging torque, and low torque ripple. On the other hand, an 18/17-pole BFPMM having the similar structure with the 18/13-pole DSPMM is analyzed, which has the best torque performance among such machines with the same stator pole number. To further improve average torque, the inner-type flux focusing (IFC) method is employed in both 18/13-pole DSPMM and 18/17-pole BFPMM. Then, both machines are optimized under the fixed copper loss and envelope size. The comparison shows that both machines have comparably small torque ripple while the 18/13-pole DSPMM with IFC (IFC-DSPMM) exhibits 35% higher torque density and 100% higher ratio of torque to PM volume. An 18/13-pole IFC-DSPMM is manufactured and tested to experimentally validate the predicted results.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF