Search

Background: Disc displacement with reduction (DDwR) is among the common disc disorders of temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which can be managed conservatively by splint therapy. Anterior repositioning splint (ARS) is the most commonly prescribed splint by dental practitioners, but not getting a normal disc– condyle relationship always and other side effects lead to need of comparing with other occlusal splints. This review will help in informed decision-making by clinicians in choosing an appropriate splint type for patients. Aim: The aim is to compare the effectiveness of ARS in the management of DDwR with other occlusal splints for TMJ and muscle pain, TMJ noise, any adverse effects, regaining normal disc–condyle relationship. Materials and Methods: We followed published protocol in the International prospective register of systematic reviews. Databases were searched till May 2023 using different search strategies as per the database. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening and data extraction with risk of bias, was done by two independent reviewers in Covidence. Outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) for dichotomous or continuous outcomes, respectively, using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager 5.4) software. We used a random effect model for statistical analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Guideline Development Tool (GRADEpro GDT) software. Results: A total of 1145 reports were found from a database search. After screening, four studies were included for systematic reviews. Other occlusal splints reported were sagittal vertical extrusion device and mandibular ARS, full hard stabilization splint of canine or centric stabilization type. Data of only two studies could be used for meta-analysis having 30 participants received ARS and 40 received other occlusal splints. We did not find evidence of any difference between ARS and other occlusal splints for TMJ clicking in short term (RR 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.72) but a small difference in favor of other occlusal splint in long term (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.04–5.55). No evidence of any difference was found between both treatments for TMJ pain in short term (MD-5.68, 95% CI-17.31–5.95) and long term (MD 0.00, 95% CI-2.86–2.86) and muscle pain in short term. The certainty of evidence for comparison of two treatments for different outcomes was of low or very low level. Conclusion: Evidence is uncertain that other occlusal splints reduced TMJ clicking slightly in comparison to ARS. For the remaining outcomes, no evidence of any difference was found between the two splints and it may be biased due to selection bias, inadequate blinding of participants, and outcome assessor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Occlusal splint treatment is commonly used to treat a variety of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), with efficacy ranging between 70% and 90%. Centric splints are effective in relieving muscular soreness in individuals with TMD. Electromyography (EMG) quantifies muscle activity and can be used as an accessory diagnostic tool to evaluate the efficiency of the splint on the masticatory complex. Electromyography is used for assessing patients with TMD and observing muscle electromyography. TMD patients have altered electromyographic (EMG) masticatory muscle activity because of its change in electrical activity index or because of the compensatory mechanism for the disorder. Therefore, this study serves to evaluate the efficacy of the centric stabilization splint on TMD using EMG. Settings and Design: This cross-sectional study enrolled Ten TMD Patients with TMD, who underwent treatment with centric stabilization splint. Materials and Methods: The study involved ten young adults with TMD aged 18–45 years who were recruited without regard to sex, religion, caste, or socioeconomic background. The participants were randomized to receive a flat-contact upper stabilization splint and pregelled EMG electrodes to assess the immediate impact of centric splints on TMDs. After 3 months of follow-up, muscle activity and muscle symmetrical activity were measured to assess improvement in the symptoms of TMD. Statistical Analysis Used: The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the variables’ distribution using SPSS 26.0. Symmetrical activity and treatment response were investigated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: It showed an improvement in the temporalis, masseter, and sternocleidomastoid muscles’ resting EMG activity. A statistically significant improvement was seen in the EMG activity of the bilateral temporalis, right masseter, right sternocleidomastoid, and left digastric muscles while clenching. The masseter, sternocleidomastoid, and digastric muscles all displayed significantly enhanced symmetrical activity (P < 0.05). Conclusions: This research concludes that a centric stabilizing splint assists in relieving TMD symptoms. There was enhanced masticatory muscle activity both at rest and during function. Furthermore, there was an improvement in symmetrical activity of the masticatory muscles, which improved balance and enhanced the effective functioning of the masticatory complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of team-based learning and a flipped classroom approach to enhance understanding of the posterior palatal seal (PPS) in dental education. The PPS is crucial for denture retention but can be challenging to visualize and record accurately. By combining active learning methods, such as team-based learning and flipped classroom, students were able to apply theoretical knowledge practically, foster critical thinking, and improve collaboration skills. The study suggests that this approach leads to increased student engagement and deeper learning, but further research is needed to explore its benefits and challenges across different student cohorts. [Extracted from the article]

The aim of this review is to present the currently available studies on the treatment outcome of socket shield technique (SST) with an attempt to compare it with the conventional technique for immediate implant placement. An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. All relevant human studies reporting the treatment outcome of SST in conjunct with immediate implant placement were included. In vitro studies, case reports, reviews, systematic reviews and articles not related to SST were excluded. The initial electronic database search identified 606 articles. After removing the duplicates, reading the titles and abstracts, 19 articles were eligible for full-text reading. Two case series were excluded as the specific treatment outcomes of the clinical cases were not mentioned. Further, one article was included after hand searching of the reference lists. Eighteen articles were included for the final review. These 18 articles consisted of 15 full texts and 3 abstracts. Out of them, 3 were randomized controlled trials, 7 were retrospective studies, 4 were prospective studies, 1 was a prospective case series, 1 was a prospective nonrandomized controlled study and 2 were comparative studies. This review concludes that though the implant survival rate may be comparable in SST and the conventional technique, the SST seems to perform better in terms of bone preservation, esthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, further randomized clinical trials are required to generate strong evidence for recommending SST over the conventional technique for long-lasting successful treatment outcomes with immediate implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: The survey was conducted to evaluate the awareness among dentists and radiologists regarding the safety and interactions of dental materials in relation to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was circulated among professionals of the North Indian population as Google forms to assess their awareness regarding the safety of dental implants in MRI field, and the results were calculated by the same application. Results: A majority of the professionals seemed to be well-informed regarding the magnetic nature of materials used as dental implants. However, there were mixed opinions regarding the biosafety of different dental materials used for prosthetic restoration of implants or as prosthesis that maybe attached to oral structures. Conclusion: The present survey revealed that the most professionals possess the knowledge and awareness about biosafety of dental materials, there still a further need to increase awareness to avoid dilemmas in routine practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present article is to review the success of bone augmentation performed as an adjunct to dental implant rehabilitation in patients with diabetes mellitus. A literature review was conducted in PubMed on this topic, which yielded a total of 102 publications. For inclusion, publications had to be human studies, written in English language and should report on the success of bone augmentation as an adjunct to dental implant rehabilitation in diabetic patients. After screening the titles and abstracts, 11 full texts publications were obtained, of which seven were included in the review. These studies provided data on various bone augmentation techniques such as sinus floor elevation (SFE), guided bone regeneration (GBR), and onlay bone grafting. Even though the current review revealed that there are not many studies reporting data relevant to the analyzed topic, the data obtained suggests that; (1) staged GBR technique should be considered more feasible and predictable for bone augmentation, (2) clinicians must take meticulous care when planning and conducting SFE, and (3) block bone augmentation technique should be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lack of patient contact in the pre-clinical prosthodontics curriculum makes it difficult for the students to comprehend and correlate the series of complex steps involved in complete denture fabrication. Early clinical exposure in the second year of the undergraduate program will facilitate a smooth transition of dental students from pre-clinics to clinics, thereby helping to mitigate the lacunae existing in the present curriculum., Materials and Methods: A non-randomized prospective educational interventional study was conducted among 50 second-year dental students. Early clinical exposure in the form of clinical demonstration for complete denture steps of border molding and jaw relation was given subsequent to the completion of didactic and laboratory sessions. Pre- and post-multiple-choice question tests were conducted to explore students' knowledge. Student perception towards early clinical exposure was assessed using a self-administered anonymous questionnaire, while faculty perception was gauged with the help of in-depth interviews., Results: A statistically significant difference was observed when pre- and post-multiple-choice question test mean scores were compared, showing an overall improvement in students' knowledge following early clinical exposure. Students and faculty held a positive perception towards the program and found it to be useful in enhancing the overall learning experience of the students. Faculty expressed their concern regarding limited manpower, paucity of time, and difficulty in integrating early clinical exposure into the present timetable., Conclusion: Early clinical exposure can be integrated into the traditional pre-clinical prosthodontics curriculum with appropriate time and manpower allocation. Faculty sensitization and training workshops need to be conducted before implementing this program., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, New Delhi issued approval ESICDC IEC/2022/P-44. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Maheshwari et al.)

Introduction: Sepsis is a life-threatening dysfunction and is one of the common causes of admission in intensive care units. Early diagnosis and management improves the outcome of patients. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of sepsis among patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre., Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Data of patients admitted from 1 February 2022 to 31 January 2023 was collected between 6 April 2023 to 27 April 2023. Convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval., Results: Among 1001 patients, the prevalence of sepsis was 278 (27.77%) (25-30.54, 95% Confidence Interval). Among them, 209 (75.17%) developed septic shock. The mean age was 56.6±19.34 years. Pneumonia 43 (15.46%) and genitourinary infection 43 (15.46%) were the most common sources of infection and the source was unknown in 124 (44.60%) of patients. Hypertension 75 (26.97%) was the most common comorbidity. Acute kidney injury 166 (59.71%) was the most common complication followed by thrombocytopenia 165 (59.35%) and transaminitis 79 (28.41%)., Conclusions: The prevalence of sepsis among patients admitted to the intensive care unit was higher than other studies done in similar settings., Keywords: infection; intensive care unit; sepsis; tertiary care centre.

Dentistry in the 18 th and 19 th century witnessed the development of a variety methods for attaching artificial crowns to natural roots (many known as pivots), the purpose being to provide a dental restoration that created the most natural appearance, in a simple and economical manner. The present article discusses and summarizes the historical 18 th and 19 th century pivot teeth., (Copyright 2018 © American Academy of the History of Dentistry.)