Search

Monofluoroacetate is a highly lethal toxin that causes death by inhibiting cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. The heart and brain are the primary target organs. Acute death is attributed to cardiac fibrillation and/or convulsions. Although it occurs naturally in some plants, a major source of animal intoxication is access to sodium monofluoroacetate (NaMFA) pesticide, which continues to be a concern in the USA and around the world despite restricted use in some countries including the USA. There are also concerns about misuse of this pesticide for malicious poisoning. Currently, a tissue-based diagnostic method for NaMFA intoxication in animals is lacking. There is a critical need by the veterinary diagnostic community for a simple, sensitive and reliable tissue-based diagnostic test to confirm NaMFA poisoning in animals. We have developed and extensively evaluated a sensitive novel liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry method suitable for this purpose. The limits of detection and limits of quantitation are 1.7 and 5.0 ng/g, respectively. The accuracy and precision met or exceeded expectations. The method performance was verified using the incurred kidney obtained from animal diagnostic cases. This novel kidney-based method is now available for clinical use and can help with diagnostic purposes, including detecting potential issues related to animal foods.

BackgroundAflatoxins (AFs) are common feed contaminants and are one of the common causes of toxin-related pet food poisoning and recalls.ObjectiveCurrently, there are no validated methods for the detection and quantitation of AFs in biological matrices to diagnose AF exposure in live animals. Following a successful intra-laboratory method development to quantify AFB1 and AFM1 in animal urine by HPLC with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD), the present study was conducted to extensively evaluate the method performance in an unbiased manner using blinded samples.MethodsThe evaluation included two stages. First, the performance was verified in the method-originating laboratory in a single-laboratory blinded method test (BMT-S) trial followed by a multi-laboratory blinded method test (BMT-M) trial.ResultsIn both trials, accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were satisfactory confirming the relatively good ruggedness and robustness of the method and ensuring that it will perform as expected if used by other laboratories in the future.ConclusionsWe extensively evaluated the performance of a quantitative method to detect AFB1 and AFM1 in animal urine by HPLC-FLD by two different laboratories in two separate BMT-S and BMT-M trials. Both BMT results demonstrated the satisfactory accuracy and precision of the method. It is now available to be adopted by other diagnostic laboratories for purposes of diagnosing AF intoxication in animals.HighlightsA simple urine-based diagnostic test method using HPLC-FLD that originated in a single laboratory now has passed a multi-laboratory evaluation and is now available to be shared with other diagnostic laboratories for purposes of diagnosing AF intoxication in animals so better treatment can be rendered.

Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are used to control rodent populations. Poisoning of non-target species can occur by accidental consumption of commercial formulations used for rodent control. A robust method for determining ARs in animal tissues is important for animal postmortem diagnostic and forensic purposes. We evaluated an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) method to quantify 8 ARs (brodifacoum, bromadiolone, chlorophacinone, coumachlor, dicoumarol, difethialone, diphacinone, warfarin) in a wide range of animal (bovine, canine, chicken, equine, porcine) liver samples, including incurred samples. We further evaluated UPLC-MS in 2 interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies; one an ILC exercise (ICE), the other a proficiency test (PT). The limits of detection of UPLC-MS were 0.3–3.1 ng/g, and the limits of quantification were 0.8–9.4 ng/g. The recoveries obtained using UPLC-MS were 90–115%, and relative SDs were 1.2–13% for each of the 8 ARs for the 50, 500, and 2,000 ng/g spiked liver samples. The overall accuracy from the laboratories participating in the 2 ILC studies (4 and 11 laboratories for ICE and PT studies, respectively) were 86–118%, with relative repeatability SDs of 3.7–11%, relative reproducibility SDs of 7.8–31.2%, and Horwitz ratio values of 0.5–1.5. Via the ILC studies, we verified the accuracy of UPLC-MS for AR analysis in liver matrices and demonstrated that ILC can be utilized to evaluate performance characteristics of analytical methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-coagulant rodenticides (ARs) are commonly utilized for controlling rodent populations; however, non-target companion and wildlife animals are also exposed. A method was developed for quantitation of seven ARs (chlorophacinone, coumachlor, bromadiolone, brodifacoum, difethialone, diphacinone and warfarin) and dicoumarol (a naturally occurring anti-coagulant) in animal serum. Analytes were extracted with 10% (v/v) acetone in methanol and analyzed by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry using electrospray ionization (negative mode) combined with multiple reaction monitoring. In-house method validation in the originating laboratory using non-blinded samples revealed method limits of quantitation at 2.5 ng/mL for all analytes. The inter-assay accuracy ranged from 99% to 104%, and the relative standard deviation ranged from 3.5% to 20.5%. Method performance was then verified in the originating laboratory during an exercise organized by an independent party using blinded samples. The method was successfully transferred to two naïve laboratories and further evaluated for reproducibility among three laboratories by means of Horwitz ratio (HorRat(R)) values. Such extensive validation provides a high degree of confidence that the method is rugged, robust, and will perform as expected if used by others in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aflatoxins (AFs) are secondary metabolites of fungi and are one of the causes of toxin-related pet food recalls. An intralaboratory method was previously developed to quantify aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in animal liver by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Objective: The aim of this study was to extensively evaluate the method performance with a single-laboratory blinded method test (BMT-S) and a multilaboratory blinded method test (BMT-M). Methods: Blinded tissue samples were prepared by a third-party laboratory and sent out to participating laboratories for both BMT-S and BMT-M. Results: In both tests, participants analyzed blinded samples prepared by an independent laboratory. In the BMT-S, accuracy ranged between 111 and 154% for AFB1 and 113 and 159% for AFM1 within the quantitation range of 0.1-0.5 ng/g. The HorRat values for repeatability ranged between 0.1 and 0.3 for AFB1 and 0.3 and 0.6 for AFM1. In the BMT-M, the interlaboratory accuracy ranged between 77 and 81% for AFB1 and 83 and 85% for AFM1 within the quantitation range of 0.2-10 ng/g. The HorRat values for reproducibility ranged between 0.4 and 0.7 for AFB1 and 0.4 and 0.9 for AFM1. Both recovery and reproducibility were acceptable. Conclusions: BMT-M evaluation demonstrated that the method was suitable for quantitation of aflatoxins B1 and M1 in animal liver between laboratories. Highlights: The BMT-S and BMT-M results demonstrated that the method is rugged and reproducible among the participating laboratories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aflatoxins (AFs) are secondary metabolites of fungi and are one of the causes of toxin-related pet food recalls. An intralaboratory method was previously developed to quantify aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ) and aflatoxin M 1 (AFM 1 ) in animal liver by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Objective: The aim of this study was to extensively evaluate the method performance with a single-laboratory blinded method test (BMT-S) and a multilaboratory blinded method test (BMT-M). Methods: Blinded tissue samples were prepared by a third-party laboratory and sent out to participating laboratories for both BMT-S and BMT-M. Results: In both tests, participants analyzed blinded samples prepared by an independent laboratory. In the BMT-S, accuracy ranged between 111 and 154% for AFB 1 and 113 and 159% for AFM 1 within the quantitation range of 0.1-0.5 ng/g. The HorRat values for repeatability ranged between 0.1 and 0.3 for AFB 1 and 0.3 and 0.6 for AFM 1 . In the BMT-M, the interlaboratory accuracy ranged between 77 and 81% for AFB 1 and 83 and 85% for AFM 1 within the quantitation range of 0.2-10 ng/g. The HorRat values for reproducibility ranged between 0.4 and 0.7 for AFB 1 and 0.4 and 0.9 for AFM 1 . Both recovery and reproducibility were acceptable. Conclusions: BMT-M evaluation demonstrated that the method was suitable for quantitation of aflatoxins B 1 and M 1 in animal liver between laboratories. Highlights: The BMT-S and BMT-M results demonstrated that the method is rugged and reproducible among the participating laboratories.