Search

Introduction: POLE mutant phenotype in colon adenocarcinomas represents a rare molecular subtype. These tumours are generally responsive to immune-checkpoint inhibition therapy and, therefore, are currently considered as a subtype with good prognosis. We hereby present the first detailed case presentation of a POLE mutant colon adenocarcinoma with useful microscopic features., Case Report: A 53-year-old male patient's colon adenocarcinoma histologically showed wide variety of growth patterns and massive intra- and peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate. The majority of the tumour consisted of a high-grade component resembling medullary carcinoma of the colon, while approximately one-third of the tumour was composed of conventional areas exhibiting a tubular pattern. A minority of the tumour was constituted by poorly cohesive rhabdoid cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed, and colorectal origin was proven with CDX-2 and SATB2. Furthermore, proficiency in mismatch repair proteins and SMARCB1 deficiency was observed. The unusually high-grade colon adenocarcinoma, with areas mimicking medullary carcinoma, and generally aggressive morphology raised suspicion of microsatellite instability. The diverse morphology and the SMARCB1 deficiency also raised suspicion of ultramutation caused by POLE alteration. Next-generation sequencing panel confirmed a pathogenetic mutation in POLE exon 9: p.Pro286Arg, c.857C > G., Discussion: The diverse, high-grade morphology and increased intratumoural lymphoid infiltration should raise suspicion for POLE-mutated adenocarcinoma during everyday histopathological practice. Mismatch repair proficiency results on immunohistochemistry should not determine the final diagnosis, as only a minor percentage of these tumours are MSI. In every case suspicious for POLE-mutated adenocarcinoma, a 500-cancer gene panel should be carried out., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Therapeutic treatment for advanced-stage (T 2 -T 4 ) gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention., Method: Neoadjuvant oncological treatment for GEJ and gastric cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group 1). The new protocol (FLOT, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), included patients with resectable GEJ and gastric cancer who had a clinical stage cT 2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group 2). Between 31 December 2008 and 31 October 2022, the effect of different oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T 2 -T 4 tumours were retrospectively evaluated. Results of randomly assigned patients from the earlier ECF/ECX protocol ( n  = 36) (Group 1) and the new FLOT protocol ( n  = 52) (Group 2) were compared. Effect of different neoadjuvant therapies on tumour regression, types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and oncological radicality of surgical procedures were analysed., Results: When comparing the two groups, we found that in case of the FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Group 2, n  = 52), complete regression was achieved in 13.95% of patients, whereas in the case of ECF/ECX (Group 1, n  = 36), complete regression occurred in only 9.10% of patients. Furthermore, in the FLOT group, the mean number of lymph nodes removed was slightly higher (24.69 vs. 20.13 in the ECF/ECX group). In terms of the safety resection margin (proximal), no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups. Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects. The occurrence of diarrhea was significantly higher in the FLOT group ( p  = 0.006). Leukopenia and nausea occurred more commonly with the old protocol (Group 1). The rate of neutropenia was lower following FLOT treatment ( p  = 0.294), with the lack of grade II and III cases. Anaemia occured at a significantly higher rate ( p  = 0.036) after the ECF/ECX protocol., Conclusions: As a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-esophageal junction and gastric cancer, the rate of complete tumour regression increased significantly. The rate of side effects was also appreciably lower following the FLOT protocol. These results strongly suggest a significant advantage of the FLOT neoadjuvant treatment used before surgery., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Paszt, Simonka, Budai, Horvath, Erdos, Vas, Ottlakan, Nyári, Szepes, Uhercsak, Maraz, Torday, Tiszlavicz, Olah and Lazar.)

The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib therapy initiated between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2022 was evaluated based on a retrospective review of data from 14 renal centers in Hungary. The starting dose was 60 or 40 mg. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were performed every 4 weeks and imaging studies 3-monthly. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity according to NCI CTCAE 4.0. A total of 230 patient records were evaluated, 201 (87.4%) of them had clear cell RCC. Cabozantinib was administered as third, second and first-line treatment in 48.7%, 38.3% and <5% of cases, respectively. Dose reductions occurred in 62.6% and treatment interruption in 6.5%. Duration of therapy was 10.03 months, which was independent of dose reduction. Overall tumor response rate was 39.2% and clinical benefit was 82.8%. The duration of first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment was 11.47, 8.03, 11.57 and 10.13 months, respectively. Overall survival from the start of therapy was 22.0 months. Cabozantinib therapy in daily practice was more beneficial than according to registry study results. Dose reduction did not affect efficacy.

Introduction. Recently the therapeutic treatment for advanced, stage T2-T4 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer and those adjacent to the regional lymph nodes involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention. Method. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment for gastro-oesophageal junction cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group I). In the course of the new protocol (FLOT-, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), patients were included with resectable gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who had a clinical-stage cT2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group II). Between 31st of December 2013 and 1st of June 2021 we retrospectively analyzed the effect of these FLOT oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T2-T4 tumors (n = 9). We compared the results of the randomly assigned nine patients from earlier ECF/ECX protocol (Group I). We analyzed the effect of the different neoadjuvant therapy on tumor regression, and evaluated the types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and the oncological radicality of surgical procedures (number of removed regional lymph nodes, resection margins). Results. Comparing the two groups we found that in cases of FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy complete regression was achieved significantly a higher number like in earlier ECX/ECF therapy. Furthermore, the average number of removed lymph nodes, and the safety resection margins (distal, circumferential) no significant difference was found between the two groups. Neutropenia was the most frequently encountered side effect. Leukopenia, neutropenia and nausea occurred more frequently in cases of the old protocol (Group I). Conclusions. As a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, the number of cases with complete tumor regression has significantly increased. The present results strongly suggest a significant advantage in favor of FLOT neoadjuvant treatment following surgery. The prevalence of side effects was also appreciably lower in cases of the FLOT protocol.

The primary aim of AVACONT was to collect data in the course of routine oncological care from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab supplemented fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy doublet in an open, multicentre, observational study in Hungary. Primary endpoint of the study was to determine progression-free survival (PFS). The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised 280 patients. Median PFS calculated from enrolment was 270 days in the FAS population. The metastatic involvement of the liver or more than one organ significantly decreased (250 and 245 days), while a clinical response achieved significantly increased (partial response: 404, complete response: 623 days) the mPFS calculated from enrolment. PFS calculated from the start of the first-line treatment was significantly decreased by the presence of mutant RAS gene (481 vs. 395 days). The results confirm the efficacy, known prognostic factors and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy dosed during standard oncology care in Hungarian centres.

Introduction: Secondary urinary tract tumors are uncommon findings and mainly evolve by direct invasion from adjacent organs. Actual metastatic involvement often develops in the urinary bladder, while the upper urinary tract is infrequently affected. In addition, the lungs, breast, and prostate gland are the usual primary sites. Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) may spread to the ureter directly or seeds via vascular or lymphatic channels. It may pose struggles in the differential diagnosis because CRC shares standard pathologic features with the primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract., Case Presentation: We describe the case of an 81-year-old man who was referred to our hospital with a distal ureteral tumor that was treated by a ureteronephrectomy. The histopathological and genetic analysis established the diagnosis of metastatic CRC along with 3 metastases in the renal pelvis., Conclusion: This rare case highlights the limitations of conventional histological processing, including immunohistochemistry, and it underlines the role of molecular investigations in certain circumstances., (© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Benign foregut cysts usually develop in the thorax most of all in the mediastinum. Rare cases involving various abdominal organs, such as liver, stomach or pancreas have been previously published, mostly occurring in the retroperitoneum., Case Presentation: We herein present an adenocarcinoma of a foregut cyst involving the left side of the diaphragm, left lower lobe of the lung, and left lobe of the liver, successfully removed through multivisceral resection. In between drug holidays, postoperative oncological treatment has been ongoing for nearly 4 years. In terms of chemotherapy, FOLFOX 4 regime, capacitabine monotherapy and later on next generation sequencing has been attempted, although the patient refused the later treatment option. Despite multimodality (combined surgical and oncological) treatment, local- and later on loco-regional recurrence has been detected on follow-up staging, influencing further chemotherapy regime. Taking both the fairly unknown type of the tumor and uncertain response rate to oncological therapy into account, prolonged tumor pace with fairly stable general patient state was reached throughout the course of the disease., Conclusion: Through surgical tumor resection, and postoperative chemotherapy the patient managed to maintain an acceptable quality of life without major symptoms during ongoing treatment. During our own case, with multiple organ involvement, multivisceral resection, with multimodality treatment had considerable effect in prolonging the lifespan of the patient.

Background: Targeted therapies significantly improve clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Several new agents have been approved for first- and second-line use. However, there is a lack of compelling evidence comparing sequencing strategies, and available comparative data regarding the real-world effectiveness of different therapeutic sequences are limited., Materials and Methods: We identified mRCC patients who initiated targeted therapy between January 1, 2008 and May 31, 2017 from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database of Hungary. Overall survival (OS) and duration of first-line treatment (DFT) were obtained for patients receiving sunitinib-everolimus, sunitinib-axitinib, or pazopanib-everolimus treatment sequences. OS of sunitinib-everolimus and sunitinib-axitinib sequences was also determined for patients having better or worse response to sunitinib first-line therapy., Results: Median OS was significantly longer among patients treated with sunitinib-axitinib compared to those receiving sunitinib-everolimus. Median DFT was also significantly longer in the sunitinib-axitinib vs. sunitinib-everolimus group. Sunitinib-axitinib was associated with significantly longer median OS compared to sunitinib-everolimus in patients with better response to first-line sunitinib in the pooled sunitinib population. In patients with worse response to sunitinib, sunitinib-axitinib was associated with a trend towards greater OS compared to sunitinib-everolimus, but the difference did not reach statistical significance., Conclusions: In this nationwide database analysis, mRCC patients treated with the sunitinib-axitinib sequence had significantly longer OS compared to those receiving sunitinib-everolimus therapy. The OS benefits of second-line axitinib were consistent among patients with better response to sunitinib defined by DFT values.

Introduction: In our retrospective study, we examined changes in the histological results and types of metastatectomies of pulmonary metastases during the last 12 years, in two 5-year periods., Aim and Method: There were 55 patients in the first group (2006-2010), 54.5% of the patients were male (n = 30), 45.5% were female (n = 25), the mean age was 57.9 years (24-80). The second group (2014-2018) consisted of 115 patients, with 60% male (n = 69) and 40% female (n = 46), the mean age was 62.2 years (26-82)., Results: During the first period, the primary tumor was found in the rectum 19.3% (n = 11), colon 17.5% (n = 10), or kidney 14% (n = 8), while during the second period, the primary tumor was in the colon in 23.1% (n = 31), in the rectum in 15.7% (n = 21), or in the kidney in 9% (n = 12). The following types of surgeries were performed: atypical resection: 38.6% (n = 22) and 46.3% (n = 62); lobectomy in 31.6% (n = 18) and 26.9% (n = 36); pulmonectomy in 10.5% (n = 6) and 1.5% (n = 2); segmentectomy in 7% (n = 4) and 9.7% (n = 13); and bilobectomy in 1.8% (n = 1) and 0.7% (n = 1) in the first and second group, respectively. The ratio of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was 5.3% (n = 3) during the first period, and this ratio increased to 64.9% (n = 87) during the second period. The mean disease-free survival between the surgery of the primary tumor and the removal of the pulmonary metastasis was 45.2 months (0-144) during the first period and 33.8 months (0-180) during the second period. The median survival was 39 months in the first period, and it increased to 59 months in the second group. The mean 5-year survival was 41% in both groups., Conclusion: During the last 12 years, there was a more than two-fold increase in the number of patients requiring surgery due to pulmonary metastases, and the ratio of VATS metastasectomy increased significantly as well (5.3% vs. 64.9%). No significant difference was found in the ratio of the types of the primary tumors. The median survival was slightly better in the second group. Orv Hetil; 161(29): 1215-1220.

A global, open-label, expanded-access trial (EAT) provided sunitinib treatment on a compassionate-use basis to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) between 2005 and 2011. This retrospective analysis examines outcomes in patients from Central and East European (CEE) countries participating in the global EAT. Sunitinib (starting dose 50 mg orally once daily, with dose reduction for toxicity) was administered in repeated 6-week cycles (4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) until occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments were guided by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria but were performed according to local standards of care. In total, 401 CEE patients received sunitinib (median treatment duration 9.6 months), of whom 378 were evaluable for tumor response. The most frequent grade ≥3 toxicities were fatigue (7.5 %), hypertension (7.0 %), thrombocytopenia (6.5 %), diarrhea (4.2 %), nausea and hand-foot syndrome (both 3.7 %) and neutropenia (3.0 %). Median overall survival was 30.7 months (95 % CI 23.3, ‒ months). Overall survival tended to be longer in cytokine-naïve than cytokine-experienced patients (median 60.8 vs. 27.5 months; P = 0.1324). Among patients with evaluable tumors, 4.0 % achieved a complete and 14.6 % a partial response [objective response rate (ORR) 18.5 % (95 % CI 14.7, 22.8 %)]. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95 % CI 10.3, 12.8 months). Sunitinib demonstrates safety and effectiveness in real-world mRCC patients in CEE countries. Expanded-access program patients showed a lower tumor response rate but similar survival outcomes to patients in the pivotal Phase III clinical trial of sunitinib in mRCC.

Aim: To investigate retrospectively the effects of bone metastases and bisphosphonates in sunitinib-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients., Patients & Methods: Patients in Groups (Gp) 1 and 2, but not Gp3, had bone metastases. Gp2 received bisphosphonates following standard practice., Results: Gp2 had less favorable prognosis than Gp1. Gp3 had fewer metastases and the best prognosis. More serious adverse events occurred in Gp2 versus Gp1. The difference in overall survival between Gp1 and Gp2 was not significant after adjusting for covariates. Significantly shorter overall survival in Gp1 versus Gp3 persisted after adjusting for covariates., Conclusion: Bone metastases may have a negative prognostic impact in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bisphosphonates may have delayed early disease progression for prognostically worse sunitinib/bisphosphonate-treated patients.

Skeletal involvement is common in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): ∼30% of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) will develop bone metastases. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been pursued as a therapeutic target in the treatment of metastatic clear-cell RCC (m-ccRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, became the therapy of choice for patients with m-ccRCC. Besides the undisputed efficacy of TKI in the treatment of m-ccRCC, the problem of metastatic bone disease still remains. There is evidence that the presence of bone metastases in m-ccRCC patients has a significant and clinically relevant negative impact on survival and potentially on the outcome of VEGF-targeted therapy. Also, a relatively common practice in the treatment of such patients is bone-directed therapy with bisphosphonates (BPs). Recent evidence shows a potentially synergistic effect on efficacy but also the potential for increased toxicity of combining TKIs and BPs. This review article highlights the importance of this subject and aims to facilitate further research and optimize the treatment of this important and common group of RCC patients.

Introduction: Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Ukraine represent a collection of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries in which the epidemiology and treatment of cancer varies greatly between and within countries. Current challenges include non-adherence to current treatment guidelines, restrictions in access and reimbursement for new therapies, and a lack of basic oncology programs. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a malignancy with historically poor prognosis. In CEE countries, the incidence and mortality rates of mRCC are among the highest in the world. Fortunately, mRCC represents a cancer for which a number of new targeted therapies have recently demonstrated benefit, resulting in new evidence-based treatment guidelines. Incorporating these mRCC treatment recommendations into the routine care of patients with mRCC in CEE countries would represent a major step forward for cancer care in this region., Areas Covered: This review discusses the unique challenges faced by the aforementioned Eastern European countries in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer, in an attempt to assist health-care providers in providing the best care possible for their European patients., Expert Opinion: Despite a wealth of clinical trial data supporting the use of targeted therapies for first-line treatment of mRCC, cytokine-based immunotherapy is still used in some of these European countries. With implementation and adherence to existing guidelines, treatment can be clinically and economically optimized in patients with mRCC from this region.

Our retrospective analysis compared the effectiveness of conventional antracycline-containing protocols (A+) and docetaxel/epirubicine (TE) as primary systemic chemotherapies (PSCT) for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Seventy IBC patients received either A + (n = 48) or TE (n = 22) as PSCT. The objective clinical response and clinical benefit rate of treated patients were 54.3% (A+: 54,2% vs. TE: 54,5%; p = 0,28) and 92.8% (A+: 91,7% vs. TE: 95,5%; p = 0,57), respectively. The clinical complete response rate (cCR) was 23.2% (A+: 27,1% vs. TE:4,5%; χ (2) = 4,79; p = 0,03) with 7.14% (A+: 10,4% vs. TE:0%; χ (2) = 2,47; p = 0,12) of pathological complete responses (pCR). The median progression free (PFS)/local progression free (LPFS)/overall survival (OS) was 2.0/5.4/4.0 years, respectively. Patients achieving cCR had a tendency for better survival parameters than patients with less than cCR. Response rates or survival data were not statistically different in the two chemotherapy (CT) treatment groups. The survival was not influenced by the number of CT cycles in either protocols. In this set of patients, the clinical efficacy of the two alternative primary systemic chemotherapies (A + and TE) is equivalent in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), despite of the significant difference in favour of A + noticed in CRs. Six cycles of CT could be enough for patients achieving CR, however sequential pre- and/or postoperative CT with non cross-resistant drugs should be considered for non-responders.

Vasorelaxation caused by some antifibrinogen RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp-containing) peptides and their basic mechanism of action was studied on rabbit isolated thoracic aortic rings preconstricted with 0.25 microM phenylephrine. GRGDS (Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-OH) and RGDV (Arg-Gly-Asp-Val-OH) caused dose-dependent relaxation. RGDS (Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-OH) had a biphasic effect (a transient relaxation followed by a contraction) while GRGDS-[SE] (Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser(SO3)-OH) did not change the isometric tone of precontracted aortic preparations. GRGDS and RGDV exerted no relaxing effect on endothelium-denuded blood vessels suggesting that the vascular action of these peptides was entirely dependent on the presence of functionally intact endothelium. L-NG-Nitro-arginine (30 microM) attenuated the relaxation induced by GRGDS and abolished that induced by RGDV. All of the four RGD congeners inhibited ADP-induced aggregation of human platelets. These findings indicate that the relaxant effect of RGDV is mediated exclusively by the nitric oxide pathway, but GRGDS could cause, besides nitric oxide release, the release of another substance which is different from nitric oxide. Because the rank order of the vasorelaxant potencies of RGD peptides differed from that found for their anti-aggregatory activities, a vascular effector mechanism mediated by an RGD-recognizing structure other than the known glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-like RGD-binding site is suggested.