Search

Dima Dandachi,1,2 Manal Hassan,3 Ahmed Kaseb,4 Georgios Angelidakis,2 Harrys A Torres2,4 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 3Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, USA; 4Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Introduction: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Antiviral therapy in patients with HCV infection reduces the risk of primary HCC development by 71%–75%. HCV-infected patients with different primary cancers are also at risk for HCC development as a second primary malignancy (HCC-SPM). Limited information is available on the occurrence and characteristics of HCC-SPM. Herein, we determine the prevalence and clinical features of HCV-associated HCC-SPM when compared to primary HCC. Materials and methods: Patients with HCV-associated HCC seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center (2011–2017) were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Patients with multiple cancers diagnosed simultaneously or with hepatitis B virus or HIV coinfections were excluded. At enrollment, patients completed a questionnaire on medical history and HCC risk factors. Information on demographics, comorbidities, HCV treatment, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and virologic and oncologic outcomes were extracted from the medical records. Results: Among 171 consecutive patients with HCV-associated HCC enrolled, 26 (15%) had HCC-SPM. Most of the underlying primary cancers were solid tumors (85%). In 12 (46%) of these patients, the diagnosis was made incidentally while undergoing surveillance for primary malignancies, and the majority (81%) had their primary cancer in remission. Most patients (72%) with documented HCV viral load had chronic viremia due to lack of diagnosis, lack of treatment, or prior unsuccessful treatment of HCV infection and only 28% had undetectable viral load following successful antiviral therapy. The overall median survival for both groups was 29 months (95% CI: 23–35) without difference between groups (p=0.2). Conclusion: Cancer patients with any malignancies must be screened for HCV as HCC-SPM can develop in 15% of infected patients. Early HCV diagnosis and treatment should be attempted to prevent the development of HCC-SPM, a condition associated with high mortality in cancer survivors. Keywords: liver cancer, cancer prevention, cancer survivors, DAA, HCV treatment

Harrys A Torres,1 Ahmed Kaseb,2 Parag Mahale,1 Ethan Miller,3 Catherine Frenette4 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, 2Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 4Department of Liver Transplantation, Weill Cornell Medical College, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA Abstract: In patients who undergo liver transplantation (LT), allograft failure secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after LT accounts for two-thirds of graft failures and deaths. Achievement of sustained virologic response before LT eliminates the risk of HCV recurrence. Only a limited number of studies have evaluated the role of antiviral treatment before LT. No published data are available regarding the use of HCV protease inhibitors before LT. We report our experience using the combination of telaprevir, pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PegIFN alfa-2a), and ribavirin in three patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting LT. Two patients had not received, and one had had a partial response to HCV therapy (PegIFN alfa-2a plus ribavirin). All three patients had genotype 1b and were started on telaprevir and full doses of PegIFN alfa-2a and ribavirin. Treatment was planned to be continued until the day of LT or 48 weeks total, whichever came first. One patient still had detectable HCV RNA after 24 weeks of antivirals and was, therefore, excluded from further analysis. The other two patients had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of antiviral therapy. In one of these patients, HCV RNA remained undetectable after LT; the other patient experienced viral relapse. HCV therapy was tolerated by all patients; no patient required permanent discontinuation of therapy because of toxic effects. All three patients experienced hematologic toxic effects. Only one patient required treatment discontinuation, due to progression of HCC. The use of telaprevir-containing regimens appears to be safe in selected patients with HCV-associated HCC awaiting LT, but more studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this treatment combination to prevent post-LT viral recurrence. Keywords: telaprevir, hepatitis C virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation

Se evaluó la capacidad in vitro de aceites esenciales obtenidos de hojas y fiores de diferentes muestras de Lippia origanoides cultivada en condiciones del Valle del Cauca, Colombia, para inhibir el crecimien- to micelial y la formación de esclerocios de Sclerotium cepivorum, patógeno causante de la pudrición blanca en cebolla. Todos los aceites evaluados mostraron efecto inhibitorio tanto en el crecimiento micelial como en la formación de esclerocios, en concentraciones de 250 - 1350 iL/L% No obstante, aquellos obtenidos a partir del quimiotipo ( presentaron el mayor poder inhibitorio en el crecimiento del micelio )concentración m+nima inhibitoria, /4( 5 120 iL/L8 y en la formación de esclerocios% 9s+, el quimiotipo ( de L. origanoides puede ser utilizado potencialmente para el control de la pudrición blanca en cebolla.

Cancer patients with haematological malignancies are at risk for chronic hepatitis E virus infection following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Strong clinical suspicion is essential for the early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this difficult-to-treat type of viral hepatitis. Commentary on: Schwarz et al. Chronic hepatitis E in a patient after CAR-T cell treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and rapid progression towards decompensated liver cirrhosis. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19892., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

One significant complication of hepatitis B virus includes reactivation (HBVr) in the context of the use of immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids and rituximab, among others. Limited data exist on the topic of HBVr risk in the context of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for which there is no strong guidance recommendation. We describe the clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and the clinical course of a single patient with recurrent mantle cell lymphoma who developed HBVr after treatment with acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the United States is ≤1%. Universal HCV screening is recommended nationwide. Here we describe our experience implementing universal HCV screening at a cancer center., Methods: In October 2016, universal HCV screening with HCV antibody (anti-HCV) was initiated for all new outpatients. Universal screening was promoted through widespread provider education, orders in the Epic electronic health records (EHRs), SmartSets, and automated EHR reminders. The effort focused on patients with solid tumors, because universal screening in patients with hematologic malignancies was already standard practice. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients screened and the proportion of patients with reactive anti-HCV test results linked to HCV care. The secondary outcome was the incidence of HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma as a second primary malignancy (HCC-SPM) in patients with a history of other cancers before HCC diagnosis. Epic's Reporting Workbench Business Intelligence tools were used. Statistical significance was defined as P<.05 on chi-square analysis., Results: From April 2016 through April 2023, 56,075 patients with solid tumors were screened for HCV, of whom 1,300 (2.3%) had reactive anti-HCV test results. The proportion of patients screened was 10.1% in the 6 months before study implementation and 34.4% in the last 6 months of the study (P<.001). HCV screening was ordered using SmartSets in 39,332 (45.8%) patients and in response to automated EHR reminders in 10,972 (12.8%) patients. Most patients with reactive anti-HCV test results were linked to care (765/1,300; 59%), most with proven HCV infection were treated (425/562; 76%), and most treated patients achieved sustained virologic response (414/425; 97%). The incidence of HCC-SPMs was 15% in historical controls treated from 2011 to 2017 and 5.7% following implementation of universal screening (P=.0002)., Conclusions: Universal HCV screening can be successfully implemented in cancer hospitals using an EHR-based multipronged approach to eliminate HCV and prevent HCV-associated HCC-SPMs.

Background: Patients with cancer with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are excluded from many cancer clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, data are limited regarding the management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer treated with ICIs. To address this gap, we reviewed the literature on management of HBV and HCV infections in patients with cancer receiving ICIs., Methods: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed for all original research articles, case reports, and systematic reviews published in English between Jul 2013 and Jul 2023 on patients with cancer with HBV or HCV infection receiving ICIs., Results: We found 28 studies (three prospective clinical trials, seven retrospective cohort studies, nine retrospective case series, and nine case reports) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HBV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HBV reactivation was 1.4% (38/2799), and no HBV-related deaths were reported. The frequency of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic and past HBV infections was 2% (35/1667) and 0.3% (3/1132), respectively. The risk of HBV reactivation was significantly higher among patients with chronic HBV infection not receiving antiviral prophylaxis than among those receiving antivirals (17% vs 1%, p < 0.05). Based on high-quality evidence, for patients with chronic HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended before ICI therapy initiation. For patients with past HBV infection, monitoring and on-demand antiviral treatment are sufficient. We found 11 studies (five clinical trials, five retrospective studies, and one prospective observational study) that evaluated the safety of ICI therapy in patients with HCV infection and cancer. The overall rate of HCV reactivation was 0.5% (2/387), and no HCV-related deaths were reported. HCV reactivation occurs primarily in patients receiving immunosuppressants for ICI-related toxic effects. ICIs are safe for HCV-infected patients with solid tumors., Conclusions: Chronic HBV or HCV infection should not be considered a contraindication for ICI therapy. Specific risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies are necessary to reduce the risk of ICI-related liver injury in patients with cancer and chronic HBV or HCV infection.

Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HAT is and has been principal investigator for research grants from the National Cancer Institute, Gilead Sciences, and Merck & Co., Inc., with all funds paid to the MD Anderson Cancer Center. HAT is and has been a paid scientific advisor for AbbVie, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., and Dynavax Technologies; MD Anderson Cancer Center is managing the terms of these arrangements in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. All other co-authors declare no competing interests.

Background: The fourth-generation (4th-gen) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1/2 antibody/antigen (Ab/Ag) combination immunoassay currently used for HIV screening offers greater sensitivity than previous assays, but false-reactive results occur in up to 20% of patients. Large-scale observations in cancer patients are lacking., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients seen at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (March 2016-January 2023) who had reactive 4th-gen ARCHITECT HIV-1/2 Ab/Ag combination immunoassay results. We analyzed characteristics of patients with true-reactive and false-reactive results, defined based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria., Results: A total of 43 637 patients underwent 4th-gen HIV screening, and 293 had reactive 4th-gen HIV test results. Twenty-one patients were excluded because they did not have cancer. Among the remaining 272 patients, 78 (29%) had false-reactive results. None of these patients experienced delays in their cancer treatment, but 26% experienced mental distress. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 5 predictors of having false-reactive results: age >60 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.983; P < .0001), female sex (aOR, 6.060; P < .0001), race/ethnicity (Black: aOR, 0.274; Hispanic: aOR, 0.236; P = .002), syphilis coinfection (aOR, 0.046; P = .038), and plant alkaloids therapy (aOR, 2.870; P = .013)., Conclusions: False-reactive 4th-gen HIV test results occur in almost one-third of cancer patients. Physicians should be aware of the high rates of false-reactive HIV screening results in this patient population. These findings may have implications for counseling regarding testing, especially among those at low risk for HIV infection., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. H. A. T. is or has been the principal investigator for research grants from the National Cancer Institute, Gilead Sciences, and Merck & Co, Inc, with all funds paid to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; is or has been a paid scientific advisor for AbbVie, Inc, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Merck & Co, Inc, and Dynavax Technologies; and reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Inc, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Merck & Co, Inc, and Dynavax Technologies. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Data are scarce regarding the virologic impact and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We examined the virologic impact of ICI in HCV-infected patients with solid tumors and their safety., Methods: HCV-infected patients with solid tumor treated with ICI at our institution between April 26, 2016, and January 5, 2022, were enrolled in a prospective observational study. The primary outcomes were ICI-induced changes in HCV viremia (HCV inhibition and HCV reactivation) and safety of ICI., Results: We enrolled 52 consecutive patients with solid tumors treated with ICI. Most were men (41; 79%), White (31; 59%), without cirrhosis (34; 65%), and with HCV genotype 1 (40; 77%). Four patients (7.7%) experienced HCV inhibition while receiving ICI including 1 patient who developed undetectable viremia for 6 months in the absence of direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Two patients (4%) developed HCV reactivation, both while receiving immunosuppressive therapy for ICI-related toxic effects. Adverse events occurred in 36 patients (69%), and 39 of the 47 adverse events (83%) were grade 1-2. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 8 patients (15%), and in all cases, they were related to ICI, not to HCV. No HCV-associated liver failure or death occurred., Discussion: Inhibition of HCV replication with virologic cure can develop in patients receiving ICI without DAA. HCV reactivation occurs primarily in patients receiving immunosuppressants for ICI-related toxic effects. ICI are safe in HCV-infected patients with solid tumors. Chronic HCV infection should not be considered a contraindication for ICI therapy., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Despite the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), patients with a viral hepatitis have been excluded from clinical trials because of safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) in patients with viral hepatitis who received ICIs for cancer treatment., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with cancer and concurrent hepatitis B or C, who had undergone treatment with ICI at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019., Results: Of the 1076 patients screened, we identified 33 with concurrent hepatitis. All 10 patients with HBV underwent concomitant antiviral therapy during ICI treatment. Sixteen of the 23 patients with HCV received it before the initiation of ICI. The median follow-up time was 33 months (95% CI, 23-45) and the median duration of ICI therapy was 3 months (IQR, 1.9-6.6). Of the 33 patients, 12 (39%) experienced irAEs (immune-related adverse events) of any grade, with 2 (6%) having grade 3 or higher. None of the patients developed hepatitis toxicities., Conclusion: ICIs may be a therapeutic option with an acceptable safety profile in patients with cancer and advanced liver disease., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are used to treat B-cell hematologic malignancies. Ibrutinib has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We sought to identify patients with hematologic malignancies who developed HBV reactivation after receiving first-generation (ibrutinib) or second-generation (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) BTK inhibitors., Methods: We retrospectively studied all consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies with past HBV infection (HBV surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc] positive) or chronic HBV infection (HBsAg positive and anti-HBc positive) treated with BTK inhibitors at our institution from November 1, 2015, through November 1, 2022., Results: Of 82 patients initially identified, 53 were excluded (11 because of false-positive anti-HBc results, and 42 because they were receiving anti-HBV prophylaxis owing to recent receipt of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). The 29 remaining patients were further analyzed and 3 (10%; 2/28 with past and 1/1 with chronic HBV infection) were found to have HBV reactivation. One patient received ibrutinib, and 2 received acalabrutinib. All developed HBV-associated hepatitis requiring anti-HBV therapy and survived. One patient continued receiving acalarutinib. Among the patients with past HBV infection, 13 received ibrutinib and 1 (8%) had HBV reactivation; 14 received acalabrutinib and 1 (7%) had HBV reactivation (P = 1.0)., Conclusions: HBV reactivation risk is intermediate in patients with past HBV infection who receive BTK inhibitors. For patients with past HBV infection who received BTK inhibitors, data are insufficient to recommend universal anti-HBV prophylaxis, but monitoring for HBV reactivation is warranted., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Ahmed has research support paid to MD Anderson Cancer Center for clinical trials from Seattle Genetics, Merck, Xencor, Chimagen, and Tessa Therapeutics. Dr. Ahmed is a member of the Tessa Therapeutics and Chimagen scientific advisory committees, serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Myeloid Therapeutics, and is a consultant for ADC Therapeutics, and Gilead Sciences. Dr. Thomas has research support from BMS, Cellectar Biosciences, Acerta Pharma, X4 Pharma, and Genentec, and has been a paid scientific advisor for Cellectar Biosciences. Dr. Khawaja has received an honorarium from MEDSCAPE for educational activities. Dr. Torres is or has been the principal investigator for research grants from the National Cancer Institute, Gilead Sciences, and Merck & Co., Inc., with all funds paid to MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Torres is or has been a paid scientific advisor for AbbVie, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., and Dynavax Technologies; MD Anderson Cancer Center is managing the terms of these arrangements in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this international multicenter study, we aimed to determine the independent risk factors associated with increased 30 day mortality and the impact of cancer and novel treatment modalities in a large group of patients with and without cancer with COVID-19 from multiple countries., Methods: We retrospectively collected de-identified data on a cohort of patients with and without cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and November 2020 from 16 international centers., Results: We analyzed 3966 COVID-19 confirmed patients, 1115 with cancer and 2851 without cancer patients. Patients with cancer were more likely to be pancytopenic and have a smoking history, pulmonary disorders, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and corticosteroid use in the preceding 2 wk (p≤0.01). In addition, they were more likely to present with higher inflammatory biomarkers (D-dimer, ferritin, and procalcitonin) but were less likely to present with clinical symptoms (p≤0.01). By country-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses, cancer was not found to be an independent risk factor for 30 day mortality (p=0.18), whereas lymphopenia was independently associated with increased mortality in all patients and in patients with cancer. Older age (≥65y) was the strongest predictor of 30 day mortality in all patients (OR = 4.47, p<0.0001). Remdesivir was the only therapeutic agent independently associated with decreased 30 day mortality (OR = 0.64, p=0.036). Among patients on low-flow oxygen at admission, patients who received remdesivir had a lower 30 day mortality rate than those who did not (5.9 vs 17.6%; p=0.03)., Conclusions: Increased 30 day all-cause mortality from COVID-19 was not independently associated with cancer but was independently associated with lymphopenia often observed in hematolgic malignancy. Remdesivir, particularly in patients with cancer receiving low-flow oxygen, can reduce 30 day all-cause mortality., Funding: National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: IR, RH, NM, TD, HD, YJ, VS, BS, AB, RS, AF, EG, AB, NM, NH, SS, TD, YV, SF, AP, RC, VM, JA, JB, FK, BG, TJ, EY, HT, NA, MY, CR, MP, NA, RR, SA, RD, PC, TM, KI, RH, RA, AG, CP, DL, MS, BT, CA, DK, AM, AC No competing interests declared, (© 2023, Raad, Hachem et al.)

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in immunocompetent patients can lead to chronic hepatitis and liver failure. However, the burden of HEV infection in cancer patients is largely unknown. We studied the characteristics of HEV infection in patients at a tertiary care cancer center in the United States. This retrospective study included adult cancer patients with HEV infection diagnosed between September 2011 to September 2021. A total of 405 patients were tested for HEV, and 63 (16%) had detectable HEV IgG. Thirty-three patients (52%) were male, 43 were born in America (68%), 46 (73%) were screened for HEV because of pre-existing liver conditions, and 22 (35%) had hematological malignancies. Only 2 patients had detectable HEV RNA. The first patient had myelodysplastic syndrome and underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). He developed elevated liver enzymes with HEV RNA 14,000 IU/mL (4.2 log IU/mL) 13 months after HSCT. After reducing immunosuppression, his HEV viremia resolved. The second patient had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and underwent anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. She had elevated liver enzymes with HEV RNA 4,560,000 IU/mL (6.7 log IU/mL) 12 months after CAR T-cell therapy. She developed chronic HEV infection, and ribavirin treatment failed. Now she is being considered for salvage treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin. This study is the first report of chronic HEV infection in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy. HEV infection in cancer patients appears to be at least as common as in the general population. Cancer patients with hematologic malignancies may be at risk for HEV viremia and chronic infection refractory to antiviral treatment., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There is no prospective data on 8 weeks of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with different types of malignancies. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety with 8 weeks of DAA therapy in cancer patients with chronic HCV infection., Methods: Patients treated with DAAs at our center during 2014-2021 were included in a prospective observational study. Efficacy (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks; SVR12) and safety [adverse events and clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs)] were assessed., Results: We included 47 patients. Most were men (29; 62%), white (33; 70%), non-cirrhotic (45; 96%), and with HCV genotype 1 (38; 85%). None of the patients had HCC. The SVR12 rate was 96% (45/47; 95% CI: 86-99%) for the entire study cohort, 100% [17/17; 95% CI: 82-100%] for the patients treated with GLE/PIB and 93% [28/30; 95% CI: 79-98%] for the patients treated with LDV/SOF. Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference in SVR12 rates between the regimens (P = 0.53). No patients had serious adverse events (grade 3-4) or treatment discontinuation. Among the 17 patients who received concomitant cancer therapy, no DDIs occurred., Conclusion: Eight weeks of DAA therapy is highly effective and safe in HCV-infected patients with different types of malignancies and may grant access to investigational cancer therapy, broadening treatment options., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Testing for antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) is a low-cost diagnostic method worldwide; however, an optimal screening test for HCV in patients with cancer has not been established. We sought to identify an appropriate screening test for HCV infection in patients with hematologic malignancies and/or hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). Patients in our center were simultaneously screened using serological (anti-HCV) and molecular (HCV RNA) assays (February 2019-November 2019). In total, 214 patients were enrolled in this study. Three patients (1.4%) were positive for anti-HCV, and 2 (0.9%) were positive for HCV RNA. The overall percentage agreement was 99.5% (95% CI: 97.4-99.9). There were no cases of seronegative HCV virus infection. The positive percentage agreement was 66.7% (95% CI: 20.8-93.9), and the negative percentage agreement was 100.0% (95% CI: 98.2-100.0). Cohen kappa coefficient was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.41-1.00, P < .0001). The diagnostic yield of screening for chronic HCV infection in patients with cancer is similar for serologic and molecular testing., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Limited data are available on the use of CD4+ T-cell count and percentage to predict response to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment outside the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HIV coinfected population. We sought to determine the impact of CD4+ T-cell count and percentage on response to DAAs in cancer patients with HCV monoinfection. Patients treated with DAAs were enrolled in a prospective observational study. CD4+ T-cell count and percentage was measured at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks after the EOT (SVR12). A total of 174 patients were enrolled. Most patients (155/174, 89%) achieved an SVR12. A multivariate logistic regression model found that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, HCV-3 and previous DAA treatment were more likely to develop treatment failure. Neither univariate analysis nor multivariate logistic regression analysis did show any association between CD4+ T-cell count or percentage and SVR12. CD4 T-cell count or percentage does not appear to impact SVR rates in cancer patients with HCV monoinfection receiving DAAs., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Patients from ethnic/minority backgrounds or low socioeconomic status face numerous barriers to achieving ideal diabetes care goals. The purpose of this review is to describe the burden of diabetes in vulnerable populations; discuss the etiologic factors leading to health disparities in diabetes; and present challenges and solutions to improving diabetes care through novel diabetes self-management education and support interventions., Recent Findings: Recent interventions to alleviate health disparities utilize a combination of community health workers, peer leaders and technology-based approaches to provide diabetes self-management education and support and overcome barriers to diabetes control such as low literacy, difficulty with transportation, and cultural beliefs. These interventions achieve clinically meaningful improvements in blood glucose control as measured by haemoglobin A1C and are effective in addressing psychosocial outcomes such as diabetes distress. Research is underway to address food insecurity through food delivery and use behavioural economics principles to provide financial incentives to diabetes control., Summary: Combining human interaction through peer or community health worker led diabetes educational efforts and support with technology-based interventions shows promise in improving diabetes outcomes for vulnerable populations., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening strategies for cancer patients have not been established. We compared the performance of selective HCV screening strategies., Methods: We surveyed patients presenting for first systemic anticancer therapy during 2013-2014 for HCV risk factors. We estimated the prevalence of positivity for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and examined factors associated with anti-HCV status using Fisher's exact test or Student's t test. Sensitivity was calculated for screening patients born during 1945-1965, patients with ≥ 1 other risk factor, or both cohorts ("combined screening")., Results: We enrolled 2122 participants. Median age was 59 years (range, 18-91); 1138 participants were women. Race/ethnicity distribution was white non-Hispanic, 76% (n = 1616); Hispanic, 11% (n = 233); black non-Hispanic, 8% (n = 160); Asian, 4% (n = 78); and other, 2% (n = 35). Primary cancer distribution was non-liver solid tumor, 78% (n = 1664); hematologic cancer, 20% (n = 422); and liver cancer, 1% (n = 28). Prevalence of anti-HCV was 1.93% (95% CI, 1.39%-2.61%). Over 28% of patients with detectable HCV RNA were unaware of infection. Factors significantly associated with anti-HCV positivity included less than a bachelor's degree, birth in 1945-1965, chronic liver disease, injection drug use, and blood transfusion or organ transplant before 1992. A total of 1315 participants (62%), including 39 of 41 with anti-HCV, reported ≥ 1 risk factor. Sensitivity was 80% (95% CI, 65-91%) for birth-cohort-based, 68% (95% CI, 52-82%) for other-risk-factor-based, and 95% (95% 83-99%) for combined screening., Conclusion: Combined screening still missed 5% of patients with anti-HCV. These findings favor universal HCV screening to identify all HCV-infected cancer patients.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It has been hypothesized that chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection stimulates IGH-BCL2 clone proliferation, leading to development of FL. Furthermore, regression of FL after antiviral treatment without chemotherapy has been reported in HCV-infected patients. To clarify the relationship between HCV and FL, we compared the prevalence of IGH-BCL2 translocation and other clinicopathologic characteristics between HCV-infected and HCV-uninfected FL patients and determined the impact of HCV eradication on the oncologic outcomes of HCV-infected FL patients. The study included HCV-infected patients (cases) with FL seen at our institution during 2004-2018. Cases were matched with HCV-uninfected FL patients (controls) according to year of lymphoma diagnosis, sex, and hepatitis B serology. We studied 19 cases and 57 controls. More cases than controls had splenic involvement of FL (26% vs 5%, P = 0.02), higher histologic grade (grade 3 in 56% vs 24%, P = 0.01), absent or weak CD10 expression (42% vs 11%, P = 0.005), and absent BCL2 expression (33% vs 4%, P = 0.004). Compared to controls, cases had a lower rate of detection of IGH-BCL2 translocation (31% vs 68%, P = 0.02). Finally, cases with a sustained virologic response (virologic cure of HCV) had a better 10-year overall survival rate than did cases not treated with antivirals or controls (P = 0.001). In conclusion, HCV-infected patients with FL have unique clinicopathologic characteristics including improved overall survival with HCV eradication. The pathogenesis of FL in HCV-infected patients seems unrelated to antiapoptotic effect of IGH-BCL2 rearrangement., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Aim: No information exists regarding direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) salvage therapy for Hepatitis C (HCV)-infected patients with any type of cancer. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy (SVR12) of salvage therapy in these patients., Methods: Patients who failed initial DAAs (01/2015-01/2018) were analyzed. Resistance-associated substitutions to NS5A and NS3 were investigated by population sequencing., Results: Of 164 patients enrolled, 16 (10%) experienced treatment failure. Of these, 11 patients received salvage therapy. The majority (91%) were men; 55% had genotype 1a, 45% had cirrhosis, and 45% had hepatocellular carcinoma. Four patients failed the first salvage therapy, and two of them required a second salvage therapy. Overall, 9 of 11 (82%) patients achieved SVR12. All four patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (+/- ribavirin) achieved SVR12. The presence of resistance-associated substitutions did not impact response. Seven patients developed grade 1/2 adverse events. No patient had grade 3/4 adverse events. No patient required interruption of DAA therapy because of clinical or laboratory abnormalities., Conclusions: This is the first prospective study in HCV-infected cancer patients failing DAAs. The efficacy of salvage therapy in this group appears to be lower than previously reported in non-cancer patients, but better response rates are observed with newer regimens. Salvage therapy is associated with minimal toxicity., (© 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increases the risk for several types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as primary and second primary malignancies. HCV-infected patients with cancer, particularly those undergoing anticancer therapy, are at risk for development of enhanced HCV replication, which can lead to hepatitis flare and progression of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Risk factors for HCV infection include injection drug use, blood transfusion, or solid organ transplantation before 1992, receipt of clotting factor concentrates before 1987, long-term hemodialysis, chronic liver disease, HIV positivity, and occupational exposure. Widely available direct-acting antivirals are highly effective against HCV and well tolerated. Identification of HCV-infected individuals is the essential first step in treatment and eradication of the infection. One-time screening is recommended for persons born from 1945 to 1965; screening is also recommended for persons with risk factors. Recently, a public health recommendation has been drafted to screen all adults age 18 to 79 years. Two oncology organizations recommend screening all patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, and a recently published multicenter prospective study supports universal HCV screening for all patients with cancer. HCV screening entails testing for anti-HCV antibodies in serum and, when results are positive, HCV RNA quantitation to confirm infection. Direct-acting antiviral therapy eradicates HCV in almost all cases. Virologic cure of HCV prevents chronic hepatitis and progression to liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. HCV eradication also decreases the risk of developing HCV-associated primary and second primary malignancies, and it may allow HCV-infected patients access to important cancer clinical trials. Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis require lifelong surveillance for HCC, even after viral eradication.

Background: Data are sparse on treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in cancer patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapy (SOFBT) in cancer patients., Methods: Patients treated with SOFBT at our center during 2014-2017 were included in a prospective observational study. Efficacy [sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12)], cancer-related outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were assessed., Results: We included 153 patients. Most were men (109; 71%), white (92; 60%), non-cirrhotic (105; 69%), and with HCV genotype 1 (110; 72%). The most common cancers were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (27; 18%) and multiple myeloma (14; 9%). The overall SVR12 rate was 91% (128/141). SVR12 was 100% in patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks. Of the 32 patients initially excluded from cancer clinical trials because of HCV, 27 (84%) were granted cancer therapy access after starting SOFBT. Six patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received SOFBT without cancer treatment. Two achieved complete remission, one had partial remission, and two had stable cancer. Within 6 months after SOFBT, 5% (6/121) of patients in remission or with stable cancer, had progression or recurrence (two with HCC and one each with esophageal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, NHL, and tonsillar cancer). No de novo HCCs occurred. AEs were most commonly grade 1-2 (90%)., Conclusions: SOFBT in HCV-infected cancer patients is effective and safe, may permit access to investigational cancer therapy expanding treatment options, may induce remission of NHL, and may be used for 8 weeks.

Purpose of Review: To provide an update on recent studies of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in cancer patients with an emphasis on viral reactivation after cancer treatment, new antiviral therapies, and safety concerns., Recent Findings: The diagnostic criteria for HBV reactivation in patients receiving cancer therapy were revised in 2018. HBV reactivation in these patients is preventable, even with the use of new cancer therapies. HCV reactivation also has been reported in cancer patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies, and is not a virologic condition usually associated with poor outcome. Prophylaxis to prevent HCV reactivation is not recommended because therapy with direct-acting antivirals eradicates the infection in the majority of cancer patients., Summary: Cancer patients with HBV or HCV infection are at risk for viral reactivation, with many similarities between these two infections. Patients at high risk for reactivation will benefit significantly from taking oral antivirals, which will reduce the risk of HBV reactivation or prevent development of HCV reactivation following its virologic cure.

Background: Patients previously infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV; indicated by positivity for anti-HBc) can experience HBV reactivation during cancer chemotherapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, which is frequently used in supportive care, might facilitate passive transfer of anti-HBc. We aimed to estimate the probability of passive transfer of anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion in patients with cancer., Methods: We reviewed institutional databases to identify adult patients who received outpatient chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2011, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Eligible patients had received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, had tested negative for both anti-HBc and HBsAg before infusion, and had been tested for anti-HBc after infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who became positive for anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion., Findings: 950 of 18 874 patients who underwent chemotherapy within the study time frame received intravenous immunoglobulin, of whom 870 had been tested for anti-HBc before infusion. 199 patients who were negative for anti-HBc before receiving intravenous immunoglobulin were retested after infusion, of whom 29 (15% [95% CI 10-20]) became positive for anti-HBc. The probability of anti-HBc conversion at 1 week after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion was 34% (95% CI 22-48) and at 12 weeks was 4% (2-7)., Interpretation: Conversion of patients from anti-HBc negativity to anti-HBc positivity was common after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. However, the probability of a positive test decreased with time since infusion. Positive anti-HBc tests done shortly after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion should be interpreted with caution because they might indicate passive transfer instead of true infection., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Egypt has one of the highest prevalence rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the world, mostly with genotype 4 that is highly associated with severe fibrosis. As a consequence, hepatocellular carcinoma has become the leading cause of cancer in this country. Mauritania is a highly endemic area for hepatitis B virus (HBV). HBV and HCV could both be iatrogenically transmitted through infected blood products, infected needles, and medical equipment improperly sterilized. Adequate and efficient healthcare and public health measures with good surveillance programs, access for screening, prevention strategies, and successful treatment are needed to halt the spread of these diseases. Herein, we have reviewed the epidemiology, modes of transmission, predisposing factors, and novel treatment modalities of these viruses. We have proposed practices and interventions to decrease the risk of transmission of HCV and HBV in the affected countries, including strict adherence to standard precautions in the healthcare setting, rigorous education and training of patients and healthcare providers, universal screening of blood donors, use of safety-engineered devices, proper sterilization of medical equipment, hepatitis B vaccination, as well as effective direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of HCV., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest. No financial support.

The incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rising. It is one of the most common cancers worldwide and accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are the most important etiologies of HCC, and effective screening and management strategies are crucial to reduce the HCC risk. For HBV, which accounts for the majority of HCC cases, most infections were acquired via perinatal and early horizontal transmission. Universal vaccination of newborns has led to a decline in HCC incidence compared with the pre-vaccination era. Effective antiviral therapies with nucleos(t)ide analogues or pegylated interferon reduced the incidence of HCC. For HCV, the emergence of effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents has substantially improved cure rates; therefore all patients with HCV should be considered for DAA treatment. The most important obstacle in eliminating HCV is access to therapy. For NAFLD, the global incidence is increasing rapidly, thus its impact on HCC incidence may be explosive. Progression to HCC in NAFLD happens particularly in those with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and exacerbated by metabolic syndrome, or PNPLA3 gene polymorphism. Lifestyle changes are imperative while drug therapy has yet to demonstrate substantive protective effects on HCC prevention. For management of HCC, early diagnosis via imaging surveillance among persons with HCC risk factors remains the most important strategy to identify early-stage disease appropriate for resection or transplantation.

Purpose: Most patients with cancer are not screened for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection before undergoing anticancer therapy, and optimal screening strategies are unknown. We sought to develop selective HBV screening strategies for patients who require systemic anticancer therapy., Methods: This prospective cohort study included adults age ≥ 18 years with solid or hematologic malignancies who received systemic anticancer therapy at a comprehensive cancer center during 2013 and 2014. Patients underwent hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody testing, and completed a 19-question modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HBV survey. Multivariable models that predict chronic or past HBV infection were developed and validated using bootstrapping., Results: A total of 2,124 patients (mean age, 58 ± 13 years) completed the risk survey and HBV testing. Of these, 54% were women; 77% were non-Hispanic white, 11% Hispanic, 8% black, and 4% Asian; and 20% had a hematologic malignancy and 80% a solid tumor. Almost 12% were born outside the United States. The prevalence was 0.3% for chronic HBV infection and 6% for past HBV infection. Significant predictors of positive hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B core antibody tests were as follows: men who had sex with men, black or Asian race, birthplace outside the United States, parent's birthplace outside the United States, household exposure to HBV, age ≥ 50 years, and history of injection drug use. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model on the basis of these seven predictors was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.82). The modified CDC survey and brief tools with fewer than seven questions yielded similar false-negative rates (0% and 0% to 0.7%, respectively)., Conclusion: An internally validated risk tool performed as well as the modified CDC survey; however, more than 90% of patients who completed the tool would still require HBV testing. Universal HBV testing is more efficient than risk-based screening.

Background and Aim: Chronic HCV infection is associated with several extrahepatic manifestations (EHMs). Data on the effect of sustained virological response (SVR) on the risk of EHMs are limited., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data of patients from the US Veterans Affairs HCV Clinical Case Registry who had a positive HCV RNA test (10/1999-08/2009). Patients receiving interferon-based antiviral therapy (AVT) were identified. SVR was defined as negative HCV RNA at least 12 weeks after end of AVT. Risks of eight incident EHMs were evaluated in Cox regression models., Results: Of the 160 875 HCV-infected veterans, 31 143 (19.4%) received AVT, of whom 10 575 (33.9%) experienced SVR. EHM risk was reduced in the SVR group compared with untreated patients for mixed cryoglobulinaemia (adjusted HR (aHR)=0.61; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.94), glomerulonephritis (aHR=0.62; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79), porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) (aHR=0.41; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.83), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (aHR=0.64; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.95), diabetes (aHR=0.82; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.88) and stroke (aHR=0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94), but not for lichen planus (aHR=1.11; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.56) or coronary heart disease (aHR=1.12; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.56). Risk reductions were also observed when patients with SVR were compared with treated patients without SVR for mixed cryoglobulinaemia, glomerulonephritis, PCT and diabetes. Significant reductions in the magnitude of aHRs towards the null with increasing time to initiation of AVT after HCV diagnosis were observed for glomerulonephritis, NHL and stroke., Conclusions: Risks of several EHMs of HCV infection are reduced after AVT with SVR. However, early initiation of AVT may be required to reduce the risk of glomerulonephritis, NHL and stroke., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HAT is a consultant for Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck and Co., Dynavax Technologies, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Genentech, and has received research grants from Gilead Sciences, Merck and Co., and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Although an association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) has been reported, to the authors' knowledge the clinical significance of this epidemiological finding remains unknown. Therefore, the authors analyzed the oncologic outcomes of HCV-infected patients with OPCs., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with OPCs who were seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2015 were reviewed. HCV infection was defined as detectable HCV RNA in the serum. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were compared between patients infected with HCV and those not infected., Results: A total of 161 patients were examined. The majority of the patients were white (141 patients; 88%) and male (132 patients; 82%) and had TNM stage III or IV disease (147 patients; 91%). The OPC involved the tonsils (83 patients; 52%), base of the tongue (67patients; 42%), or the soft palate (11 patients; 7%). The median follow-up after an OPC diagnosis was 3 years (range, 1-13 years). HCV-infected patients (25 patients) and HCV-uninfected patients (136 patients) were comparable with regard to smoking and alcohol status. In multivariate analysis, HCV was associated with increased cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.85 [P = .02]) and risk of OPC progression (hazard ratio, 5.42; 95% confidence interval, 2.64-11.14 [P = .0008]) independent of age and cirrhosis status. Antivirals were administered after the diagnosis of OPC in 8 of the 25 HCV-infected patients (32%). HCV-infected patients who received antivirals were found to have better 5-year overall survival (70% vs 12%; P = .005) and progression-free survival (72% vs 19%; P = .005) compared with patients who did not., Conclusions: The early detection of HCV is important in patients with OPC because this infection may affect their oncologic outcomes. Cancer 2018;124:960-5. © 2017 American Cancer Society., (© 2017 American Cancer Society.)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes a chronic but curable infection associated with the development of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Preliminary data have shown frequent transformation of indolent lymphoma to DLBCL in HCV-infected patients. To compare their clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes, we reviewed the medical records and pathology reports of HCV-infected and uninfected patients with DLBCL that transformed from indolent lymphoma seen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (June 2004 to May 2015). To identify predictors of DLBCL relapse, patients with relapse after first-line chemotherapy were compared with those without it using univariate and logistic regression analyses. Compared with the uninfected patients (n = 63), HCV-infected patients (n = 21) were younger (median age =54 years [interquartile range= 49-62 years] vs. 62 years [53-66 years]; p = 0.01) and more often had advanced DLBCL (Ann Arbor stage 3-4; 95% vs. 76%; p = 0.05). Immunophenotypically, more HCV-infected than uninfected patients had CD10-negative B cells (76% vs. 43%; p = 0.008), CD5-positive B cells (39% vs. 7%; p = 0.004) and activated B-cell phenotypes (57% vs. 31%; p = 0.07). Comparison of the patients who had relapse after first-line chemotherapy (n = 42) and those who did not (n = 40) revealed that having CD5-positive B cells was the only factor associated with DLBCL relapse in multivariate analysis (odds ratio= 10.7; p = 0.02). HCV-infected patients with transformed DLBCL have unique clinicopathologic characteristics that make their lymphoma difficult to treat, potentially leading to unfavorable outcome. The impact of HCV eradication should be explored in such patients., (© 2017 UICC.)