Search

Ali Hooshyari,1 David Scholtz,1 Keu Maoate,1 Samuel Robertson,1 Lodewikus Petrus Vermeulen,1,2 Luiz Gustavo Modelli De Andrade,3 Paulo Roberto Kawano,4 Peter Gilling,1,2 Mark Fraundorfer,1 Flavio Vasconcelos Ordones1,2,4 1Urology Department, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand; 2Surgical Department, University of Auckland, Auckland City, New Zealand; 3Renal Department, Botucatu School of Medicine, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; 4Urology Department, Botucatu School of Medicine, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, BrazilCorrespondence: Ali Hooshyari, Urology Department, Tauranga Hospital, Bay of Plenty, 829 Cameron Road, Tauranga, New Zealand, Tel + 64 211753979, Email ahoosh95@gmail.comIntroduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. PI-RADS v2.1 score correlates with clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and according to the most recent guidelines, prevalence of CSPCa with PI-RADS 4 is 33– 41%, while PI-RADS 5 is 62– 79%. These groups are separated only by a size of 15 mm yet the difference in risk is significant. This study aims to find a size threshold associated with CSPCa within the PI-RADS 4 group, which may be used in combination with other prostatic parameters, such as PSA density in order to help with risk stratification and patient counselling in the pre-biopsy setting. This may also aid with surveillance of smaller PI-RADS 4 lesions in the setting of a negative biopsy and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies unless triggered by a size threshold.Methods: A retrospective study was performed with data from 407 patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) between April 2022 and November 2023. A subgroup of patients with PI-RADS 4 was included for analysis. A ROC-AUC was obtained.Results: Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 61– 71) and PSA density 0.20 (interquartile range 0.13– 0.28). PI-RADS score correlated with CSPCa: for PI-RADS 1 and 2, the frequency of CSPCa was 10%; for PI-RADS 3, it was 20%; for PI-RADS 4, it was 60%; and for PI-RADS 5, it was 80%, Pearson correlation = 0.51, p < 0.001. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) was determined to be 0.664 [0.579– 0.7499]. The optimal cut-off point was 8.5 mm. Patients with lesions larger than 8.5 mm had 2.31 times higher risk CSPCa.Conclusion: PI-RADS 4 size does matter and is a useful predictor of CSPCa. In our study, a cut-off of 8.5 mm was identified. The combination of PI-RADS 4 with PSA density provides a specificity higher than 80% for CSPCa detection.Keywords: PI-RADS 4, mpMRI, transperineal prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, size

Background: To enhance prostate cancer diagnosis, multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) combined with Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy has emerged as a promising technique. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical benefits over traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 83 patients diagnosed between January 2022 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy, while 42 had traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar, facilitating a direct comparison of diagnostic efficacy and complication rates. Results: The fusion-guided group showed a significantly higher detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (21/41 vs. 12/42, p = 0.035). It also detected more clinically significant cases (20/41 vs. 11/42, p = 0.033). Notably, the fusion group experienced fewer complications, including no instances of hematochezia (p = 0.003) or infections (p = 0.012), and reported lower postoperative pain levels (Visual Analog Scale score 1.8 ± 0.78 vs. 2.33 ± 1.07, p = 0.012). Conclusions: The integration of mpMRI with TRUS in fusion-guided biopsy enhances the accuracy of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, reduces procedural complications, and minimizes patient discomfort. This approach represents a significant advancement in prostate cancer management, improving both diagnostic outcomes and patient safety.

• mpMRI is recommended before prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men. • mpMRI helps improve detection of csPCa compared to TRUS-Bx. • mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT have higher sensitivity at diagnosing csPCa than mpMRI alone. • PSMA-PET/CT is superior to bone scintigraphy at identifying oligometastases. Conventionally, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was the main technique used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer since it was first described in 1989 [1]. However, the PROMIS trial showed that this random, nontargeted approach could miss up to 18% of clinically significant cancer (csPCa) [2]. Furthermore, risk of sepsis post TRUS-Bx can be as high as 2.4% [3]. Understanding the demerits of TR-biopsy have led to the introduction of transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx). The incorporation of mpMRI revolutionized prostate cancer diagnostics, allowing visualization of areas likely to harbor csPCa whilst permitting some men to avoid an immediate biopsy. Furthermore, the advent of prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is highly promising, because of its role in primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and its higher diagnostic accuracy over conventional imaging in detecting nodal and metastatic lesions. Our narrative review provides an overview on prostate biopsy techniques and an update on prostate imaging, with particular focus on PSMA-PET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study assesses whether fusion or cognitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate targeted and systematic transperineal biopsies (TPB) increase detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was completed of patients (2018–2020) undergoing 3-Tesla multiparametric prostate MRI informing targeted (either cognitive or MIM software fusion approach) and systematic TPB. ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade group ⩾ 2 was considered csPCa. Results: A total of 355 cases from 4 urologists were included; 131 were fusion and 224 were cognitive MRI-guided biopsies. Of all csPCa found, 86.8% (n = 171) of cases were confirmed to be at the MRI-indicated location and 11.6% were found as part of active surveillance. In all, 45.0% of the fusion group were found to have csPCa, compared to 62.05% (n = 139) in the cognitive group (p = 0.002). csPCa detection rates varied between urologists (41% to 78%, p < 0.001), so a subgroup analysis was performed on Urologist A; 45.0% of fusion and 41.3% of cognitive biopsies had csPCa (p = 0.644). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that biopsy type, being on active surveillance, number of biopsy cores, iPSA (initial Prostate Specific Antigen) value or PIRADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System) score made no significant difference in whether csPCa was found. Conclusion: Cognitive and fusion targeting had similar csPCa detection rates. Further prospective studies would be beneficial to validate these findings. Level of evidence: 2b (according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report non‐infectious adverse events associated with transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) performed under local anaesthesia (LA) in an outpatient setting. Patients and methods: This study reports secondary outcomes from the Norwegian arm of the prospective NORAPP study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04146142) and included all patients referred for prostate biopsy from November 2019 to February 2021. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging‐transrectal ultrasonography fusion TPBx were taken using 40 mL 1% lidocaine with 4 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate placed in the perineal skin, under the prostatic apex, in the m. levator ani bilaterally, and along the path of the needle. Follow‐up using patient‐reported questionnaires was done immediately after TPBx, and after 2 weeks and 2 months. Pain was reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during placement of the LA, and during and after TPBx. Haematuria and acute urinary retention (AUR) rates were recorded. Results: We included 402 patients, and the response rate was 99.8% (401/402). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 69 (63–74) years, the prostate volume was 40 (27–58) mL, the prostate‐specific antigen level was 7.0 (4.5–11) ng/mL, and the number of biopsy cores taken was 8 (6–10). The median (IQR) VAS pain score was 1 (1–2) during placement of LA, 1 (0–2) during TPBx, and 0 (0–0) after TPBx. Haematuria and AUR rates were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60–69%) and 0.5% (95% CI 0.1–1.8%), respectively. No patients were hospitalised or required after the TPBx surgical intervention. Conclusion: Transperineal prostate biopsies can be performed under LA with limited discomfort to the patient and few post‐TPBx adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transperineal Prostate Biopsy (TPB) is a commonly used technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer due to growing concerns related to infectious complications associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). TPB is associated with an infective complication rate of near zero, however, acute urinary retention (AUR) remains the leading complication causing morbidity. Previously in TRUSB, there was weak evidence that alpha-blockers reduce AUR rates, and their usage has been extrapolated to clinical practice with TPB. This review aims to explore if there is an evidence base for using alpha-blockers to prevent AUR following TPB. Methods: A systematic approach was used to search Ovid Medline and Embase using keywords related to "Transperineal" and "Retention". Articles were then screened by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to find studies that compared alpha-blocker recipients to no alpha-blocker use in the perioperative period and the subsequent effect on AUR in TPB. Results: 361 records were identified in the initial search to produce 5 studies included in the final review. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. One observational study showed a reduction in AUR rate from 12.5% to 5.3% with a single dose of tamsulosin. A previous systematic review of complications associated with prostate biopsy concluded there may be a potential benefit to alpha-blockers given in the TPB perioperative period. Three observational studies demonstrated a harmful effect related to alpha-blocker use; however, this was well explained by their clear limitations. Conclusion: Based on this review and the extrapolation from TRUSB data, perioperative alpha-blockers may offer some weak benefits in preventing AUR following TPB. However, there is significant scope and need for an RCT to further develop the evidence base further given the significant gap in the literature and lack of a standard alpha blocker protocol in TPB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is challenging to perform prostate biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate malignancy without a rectum to facilitate prostate biopsy. Nevertheless, such patients are presenting at an earlier stage, due to increased PSA testing in association with improved MRI imaging. We describe a novel technique for prostate biopsy in two such cases. Technique: The patient is under General Anaesthesia and in lithotomy position. The patient is catheterised and a measured volume of contrast is inserted to the catheter balloon. By using anatomical surface landmarks, placing traction on the catheter to bring the balloon to the level of the bladder neck and using fluoroscopy, the distance to the apical prostate was estimated. This facilitates image intensifier guided trans‐perineal prostate biopsy. Outcomes: A 67‐year‐old patient, with a history of panproctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, presented with increasing PSA and a suspicious prostate on MP‐MRI. The prostate couldn't be visualised on transperineal ultrasound and the patient was offered transperineal biopsy using image intensifier guidance. Several biopsy cores were taken and prostate cancer was diagnosed. The second patient was a 68‐year‐old who presented similarly, but with a history of panproctocolectomy for Crohn's disease. Using the above technique, biopsies were taken with low‐risk prostate cancer diagnosed. Subsequently, due to rising PSA levels, a repeat set of prostate biopsies was taken 13 months later in an identical manner, upstaging his disease. There were no post‐operative complications after any of the procedures. Conclusion: We review the literature and discuss several techniques available to sample the prostate in this patient cohort. We conclude that we have identified a safe and effective technique, which utilises commonly available equipment, to biopsy the prostate in the post proctectomy patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Urologia is the property of Sociedad Chilena de Urologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) offers an alternative to transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, TPB may result in additional disposable and capital equipment costs, which can limit implementation within urology practice. Herein, we report the initial experience of a novel TPB technique within a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all men undergoing prostate biopsy January to October in 2021 was performed. Both biopsy techniques were performed with the same setting using the convex–convex array ultrasound probe under local anesthesia alone or with the addition of sedation using double free-hand technique. Complications within 30 days and cancer detection rate (CDR) were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 118 biopsies were included for final analysis. Eleven patients received systematic biopsy with additional MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) cores with all performed via a transperineal approach. The TPB group (n = 47) and TRB group (n = 58) had similar CDR after excluding TB cores (46.8% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.675). General complication rates for TPB were significantly lower than in the TRB group (27.7% vs. 46.6%, p = 0.047). No patients undergoing TPB had infectious complications, where five episodes were recorded in the TRB group (p = 0.114). Conclusions: TPB performed with convex–convex ultrasound probe and double free-hand technique is safe, feasible, cost-effective, and demonstrates equivalent CDR to TRB. Its use may eliminate infectious hospitalizations while minimizing the need for additional capital in the adoption of TPB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: APROPOS was a multicentre, randomized, blinded trial focus on investigating the perineal nerve block versus the periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. In the analysis reported here, the authors aimed to evaluate the association of biopsy core count and location with pain outcomes in patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia. Methods: APROPOS was performed at six medical centers in China. Patients with suspected prostate cancer were randomized to receive either a perineal nerve block or a periprostatic block (1:1), followed by a transperineal prostate biopsy. The secondary analysis outcomes were the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy and postbiopsy pain at 1,6, and 24 h. Results: Between 12 August 2020 and 20 July 2022, a total of 192 patients were randomized in the original trial, and 188 were involved in this analysis, with 94 patients per group. Participants had a median (IQR) age of 68 (63-72) and a median (IQR) prostate volume of 42.51 (30.04-62.84). The patient population had a median (IQR) number of biopsy cores of 15 (12-17.50), and 26.06% of patients had a biopsy cores count of more than 15. After adjusting the baseline characteristics, the number of biopsy cores was associated with the worst pain during the biopsy procedure in both the perineal nerve block group (β 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12-0.26, P<0.001) and the periprostatic block group (β 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.24, P<0.001). A similar association was also evident for the postbiopsy pain at 1, 6, and 24 h. A lesser degree of pain in both groups at any time (r range -0.57 to -0.01 for both groups) was associated with biopsy cores from the peripheral zone of the middle gland, while other locations were associated with a higher degree of pain. In addition, the location of the biopsy core had less of an effect on pain during the biopsy (r range -0.01-0.25 for both groups) than it did on postbiopsy pain (r range -0.57-0.60 for both groups). Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of a randomized trial, biopsy core count and location were associated with pain in patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia. These results may be helpful for making clinical decisions about the anesthetic approach for scheduled transperineal prostate biopsies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: US-MRI fusion biopsy is established as a technique of reference for the detection of clinically significative prostate cancer compared to the ultrasound "template" technique. Several software have been developed to aid clinicians to perform a real-time fusion between MRI and US prostate imaging; however, the images can also be mentally superimposed by the operator performing a cognitive fusion. Many papers in the literature describe the feasibility and efficacy of these two techniques, but few have performed a direct comparison between them. Therefore, we selected all comparative studies with the aim to perform a meta-analysis to find if one technique leads to an improvement in the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsies performed with a transperineal approach. Our findings indicate that csPCa detection is comparable between these techniques. Thus, clinicians can choose to perform a cognitive or software-assisted biopsy in accordance with their personal experience or technologic availability without the potential risk of offering an underperforming methodology. Introduction: We aimed to find potential differences in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates between transperineal software-assisted fusion biopsy (saFB) and cognitive fusion biopsies (cFB). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify comparative studies using PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus according to the PICOS criteria. Cancer detection and complication rates were pooled using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method with the random effect model and reported as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software by Cochrane Collaboration. The quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for retrospective and nonrandomized ones. Results: Eight studies were included for the meta-analysis, including 1149 cases in software-based and 963 cases in cognitive fusion biopsy. The detection rates of csPCa were similar between the two groups (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74–1.37, p = 0.95). Study heterogeneity was low (I2 55%). Conclusion: There is no actual evidence of the superiority of saFB over cFB in terms of the csPCa detection rate. Operator experience and software availability can drive the choice of one fusion technique over the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Primary objectives: to determine whether local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (LATP) biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group =2 disease (i.e., any Gleason pattern 4 disease), compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, in biopsy-naïve men undergoing biopsy based on suspicion of csPCa. Secondary objectives: to compare (i) infection rates, (ii) health-related quality of life, (iii) patient-reported procedure tolerability, (iv) patient-reported biopsy-related complications (including bleeding, bruising, pain, loss of erectile function), (v) number of subsequent prostate biopsy procedures required, (vi) cost-effectiveness, (vii) other histological parameters, and (viii) burden and rate of detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1 disease) in men undergoing these two types of prostate biopsy. Patients and Methods The TRANSLATE trial is a UK-wide, multicentre, randomised clinical trial that meets the criteria for level-one evidence in diagnostic test evaluation. TRANSLATE is investigating whether LATP biopsy leads to a higher rate of detection of csPCa compared to TRUS prostate biopsy. Both biopsies are being performed with an average of 12 systematic cores in six sectors (depending on prostate size), plus three to five target cores per multiparametric/bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging lesion. LATP biopsy is performed using an ultrasound probe-mounted needle-guidance device (either the 'Precision-Point' or BK UA1232 system). TRUS biopsy is performed according to each hospital's standard practice. The study is 90% powered to detect a 10% difference (LATP biopsy hypothesised at 55% detection rate for csPCa vs 45% for TRUS biopsy). A total of 1042 biopsy-naïve men referred with suspected PCa need to be recruited. Conclusions This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine the diagnostic ability of LATP biopsy vs TRUS biopsy in the primary diagnostic setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the impact of the biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens., Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 247 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer at our centre from 2022 to 2023. The clinical data included age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, number of biopsy needles, number of positive biopsy needles, biopsy core length, biopsy Gleason score and post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score. Statistics were analysed by SPSS26., Result: On histopathological examination, no changes in the Gleason score were observed in 127 (51.4%) patients, whereas the Gleason score was upgraded in 101 (40.9%) patients and downgraded in 19 (7.7%) patients at radical prostatectomy. Average biopsy core length for Gleason score upgraded on radical prostatectomy (44.3 %, n = 101) was 11.11 ± 1.34 mm compared to 11.88 ± 1.03 mm(p < 0.01)for Gleason score consistent(55.7 %, n = 127). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the biopsy core length (P < 0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429--0.722) and prostate volume (P < 0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429--0.722), with both factors being significantly correlated with radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase. Furthermore, these variables were identified as independent predictors of radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase and exhibited a negative correlation. The biopsy core length was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with a cutoff value of 11.4 mm for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (AUC: 0.702, sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity 51.2%, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy may be improved with a longer biopsy core length. To enhance the consistency of Gleason scores between biopsy and radical specimens, it is recommended that the biopsy core length be at least 11.4 mm. Patients with a smaller prostate volume are at a higher risk of experiencing discordant pathological grades between biopsy and radical prostatectomy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2025 The Author(s). BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.)

Purpose: To evaluate the additional value of systematic biopsies (SB) when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies (MRI/TRUS TPBx) with needle tracking. Methods: From January 2019 to March 2021 969 Patients after a MRI/TRUS TPBx were evaluated separately for target biopsies (TB) and systematic biopsies regarding PCa detection and PCa risk evaluation. Needle tracking in the axial sequences of multiparametric MRI was used to assess the localisation of the detected PCa in the biopsy cores related to the reported PI-RADS lesions. Results: The overall cancer detection rate (CDR) for PCa and clinically significant (cs) PCa (ISUP ≥2) with the combination of TB and SB were 66 and 49%. TB detected 46% csPCa and SB 22% csPCa. SB identified 1.5% additional csPCa outside of the reported PI-RADS lesions. 16 patients (1.7%) showed a relevant upgrading from clinically insignificant PCa in TB to csPCa. In 736 patients with unilateral suspicious lesions on MRI, 145 patients (20%) were detected with contralateral PCa-positive SB. 238 patients (25%) showed PCa positive systematic biopsy cores outside of the described PI-RADS lesions. Conclusions: Needle tracking optimizes the 3D-localisation of cancer in the prostate. Our results show that the added value of SB with a reduced systematic biopsy scheme is low with regard to prostate cancer (PCa) detection and PCa risk evaluation. However, there is a relevant added value for localizing multifocal PCa in the primary diagnostic by a MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jiwoong Yu, Youngjun Boo, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Seongil Seo, Seong soo Jeon, Hyunmoo Lee, Hwang Gyun Jeon Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of KoreaCorrespondence: Hwang Gyun JeonDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of KoreaTel +82-2-2148-9599Fax +82-2-3410-6992Email hwanggyun.jeon@samsung.comPurpose: We evaluated the negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) according to biopsy setting and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) using transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsy (TPB) as the reference standard.Methods: A total of 161 patients with biopsy histories and negative pre-biopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scores of less than 3) participated in the study. TPB was performed on the following indications: “prior negative biopsy” in patients with persistent suspicion of prostate cancer (n = 91) or “confirmatory biopsy” in patients who were candidates for active surveillance (n = 70). The csPCa was defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater. We calculated the NPV of mpMRI in detecting csPCa according to biopsy history and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the clinical predicator for the absence of csPCa.Results: The detection rate of csPCa was 5.5% in the prior negative biopsy group and 14.3% in the confirmatory biopsy group (P = 0.057). None of the variables in the logistic regression models including PSAD < 0.15 ng/mL/cc and prior negative biopsy could predict the absence of csPCa. The NPV of mpMRI in detecting csPCa in patients with a prior negative biopsy worsen from 94.5% to 93.3% when combined with PSAD < 0.15 ng/mL/cc.Conclusion: Patients with negative mpMRI findings may not omit repeat biopsy even if their prior biopsy histories are negative and PSADs are < 0.15 ng/mL/cc.Keywords: early detection of cancer, prostatic neoplasm, prostate-specific antigen density, magnetic resonance imaging, negative predictive value, transperineal prostate biopsy

Aim: The goal of the analysis is to evaluate patient reported pain during transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBxP) under local anaesthesia (LA). Methods: We evaluated 55 patients who had a TPBxP under LA comprising 26 first and 29 repeated biopsies. On average 15 cores were obtained in each patient (12-18). The local anaesthesia was administered using 50cc of mesocaine applied to the perineal skin and prostate apex. No intravenous or oral analgesics were used. The patients reported the painfulness of both local anaesthesia and prostate biopsy using a scale of 1 (no pain) to 10 (highest pain imaginable). The data were then correlated with the patients' age, prostate size, PSA level and the number of taken biopsy cores. Results: The mean patient age was 66.85 years (54-78), the mean PSA was 10.11ng/ml (0.66 - 53.6), and the average prostate size was 46cc (17-126). The mean patient reported pain was 2,04 (1-7, median 2) for the application of the LA and 4.05 (1-7, median 4) for the biopsy. There was a positive correlation between the application of LA and the biopsy itself. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between patient age and the reported painfulness of TPBxP. Conclusion: TPBxP is reasonably well tolerated by patients. The biopsy itself is more painful than the application of LA. Older patients tend to tolerate the procedure better. The PSA level, prostate size and the number of biopsy cores have no effect on the patient reported pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: To evaluate clinical complications following transperineal prostate biopsy in 8.500 patients. Materials and methods: From January 2000 to January 2022, 8,500 men (median age: 62.8 years) underwent transperineal prostate biopsy; since 2011, 1,850 patients were submitted to mpMRI and in the presence of a PI-RADS score. 3, a transperineal targeted biopsy was added to systematic prostate biopsy (4 cores). All patients underwent antibiotic prophylaxis (2000-2011: levoxacin 500 tablet; 2012-2022: 2 grams intravenous of cefazolin). Among 8.500 men 1.350 (15.8%) vs. 4.520 (53.3%) vs. 2.630 (30.9%) underwent 12 vs. 18 vs. > 24 needle cores, respectively. The prostate biopsy-related complications were evaluated within 20 days from prostate biopsy; the number of patients who needed hospital admission or emergency department visit (EDV) was recorded. Results: Prostate cancer was found in 3.150/8.500 (37.1%) patients; overall, hospital admission and EDV were equal to 1.5% and 8.9% and the side effects were directly correlated with the number of needle cores resulting equal to 17.4% (12 cores), 38.7% (18 cores) and 55.3% (> 24 cores) (p = 0.001). Hospital admission and EDV in men who underwent 12 vs. 18 vs. > 24 cores occurred in 1.5% and 7.4% vs. 1.4% and 8.7% vs. 1.7% and 10.6% (p > 0.05), respectively. Conclusions: Clinical complications following transperineal prostate biopsy involved 35.9% of the patients but only 1.5% of them required hospital admission; urinary tract infection with fever was the most frequent cause of hospital recovery (33.4% of the cases), but none of the patients developed sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Urosepsis is a significant risk associated with prostate biopsy. Resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics is a challenging issue for clinicians in everyday practice. In the current study, we investigated the rates of sepsis and hospital admissions following transperineal (TP) prostate biopsies using a single dose of gentamicin. Material and methods Data for consecutive patients who underwent TP prostate biopsies (March 2019-March 2020) were included. Patients received a single-dose of prophylactic gentamicin 120 mg IV and had skin preparation with antiseptic povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution prior to the procedure. Patient's electronic records were reviewed for rates of sepsis and readmission to hospital within 7 days following TP prostate biopsy. Results A total of 365 consecutive patients were included in the study. After exclusion of non-eligible patients, 280 patients were included in final analysis. The median age was 67 years (32-83), the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 8.5 ng/ml (0.2-58), and the median prostate size was 44 cc (10-188). Approximately 58% of patients had one or more comorbidities in the form of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, asthma, chronic kidney disease, or ischemic heart disease. Adenocarcinoma was found in 71.7% of patients. None of the 280 patients developed sepsis. Urinary tract infection (UTI) occurred in 2.8% of patients with E.coli, none of them required hospital readmission. Conclusions Our single centre experience showed a 0% sepsis rate after TP prostate biopsy with single prophylactic dose of gentamicin. Future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should explore the possibility of performing these procedures without antibiotic prophylaxis in order to reduce the unnecessary use of antibiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer (PCa) has high prevalence rates in men and is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Transrectal (TR) biopsy has traditionally been the gold standard for diagnosis, but transperineal (TP) biopsy is increasingly favoured due to its lower infection risk. However, debate remains regarding which method has superior cancer detection rates. This review compares the efficacy and safety of the TP as compared to the TR prostate biopsy approach, summarizing the largest body of evidence available to date. A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We searched from the inception of the databases up to August 2024 for relevant studies comparing the cancer detection rate of TP versus TR prostate biopsy and compared their complication rates. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the differences between the TR and TP groups in the PCa detection rate. This meta-analysis included 21 studies (6 randomized control trials and 15 cohort studies) with a total of 13,818 patients (TP = 7917; TR = 5901), who were accrued between 2008 and 2024 and divided into the TR group and the TP group. The analysis revealed no significant difference in prostate cancer detection rates between the TP and TR approaches in both RCTs (OR 1.02, 95% CI (0.74, 1.41), p = 0.90) and cohort studies (OR 1.07, 95% CI (0.85, 1.35), p = 0.36). Complication profiles were largely comparable; TP demonstrated a significantly lower risk of urinary tract infections (OR 0.26, 95% CI (0.11, 0.61)) but no notable differences in acute urinary retention, haematuria, or rectal bleeding. Our findings advocate the TP approach as a safer biopsy alternative where feasible, particularly in infection-sensitive populations, without compromising diagnostic accuracy. MRI should complement biopsy strategies to enhance diagnostic precision. Future research should focus on standardized, large-scale RCTs to further refine and personalize prostate cancer diagnostic pathways., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Abdulrasheed et al.)

Purpose This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for the assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men, prior to prostate biopsies, based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and clinical parameters. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 300 men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 4.0 ng/mL and/or abnormal findings in a digital rectal examination), who underwent bpMRI-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted and systematic biopsies in the same session, at a Korean university hospital. Predictive models, based on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data Systems scores of bpMRI and clinical parameters, were developed to detect csPCa (intermediate/high grade [Gleason score ≥ 3+4]) and compared by analyzing the areas under the curves and decision curves. Results A predictive model defined by the combination of bpMRI and clinical parameters (age, PSA density) showed high discriminatory power (area under the curve, 0.861) and resulted in a significant net benefit on decision curve analysis. Applying a probability threshold of 7.5%, 21.6% of men could avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy, while only 1.0% of significant prostate cancers were missed. Conclusion This predictive model provided a reliable and measurable means of risk stratification of csPCa, with high discriminatory power and great net benefit. It could be a useful tool for clinical decision-making prior to prostate biopsies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Florence (1801-464X) is the property of Care Comm s.r.o. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Patients who have a previously negative biopsy in the setting of clinical suspicion of prostate cancer still have a high risk of harboring significant undiagnosed disease. Various markers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, PSA density, PCA3, and newer markers may aid in repeat biopsy selection. Repeating the same biopsy procedure in such patients does not yield high cancer detection rates. More anteriorly directed transrectal or transperineal biopsies are indicated. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can detect abnormal areas, and lesion-targeted biopsies can improve the cancer detection rate.

Abstract Background To report a new standardized cognitive fusion technique on transperineal targeted biopsy (TB) of prostate, and to evaluate its efficacy for cancer detection combined with systematic biopsy (SB) . Methods We present a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) imaging of the prostate with subsequent transperineal prostate biopsy from January 2016 to December 2018. A free-hand 12-core SB was performed for each patient. PI-RADS 3–5 lesions were further targeted for biopsy with our TB technique. Firstly, a central point of suspicious lesion (B′) was registered cognitively on a transverse section of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Then, biopsy gun punctured vertically through a fixed pioneer site (A) on skin of perineum, and deep into the TRUS section to get A’. Next, targeted site (B), the surface-projection of B′, would be determined on skin of perineum by A and distance from B′ to A’. Finally, puncture through B to reach B′. Pathological findings of SB and TB were analyzed. Results A total of 126 patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (47 SB only, 79 SB + TB). The age of the patients was 68.7 ± 9.2 years. The median preoperative PSA value was 11.8 ng/mL. Preoperative prostate volume was 60.5 ± 50.0 mL. The numbers of patients with PI-RADS scores of 1 through 5 were 4, 43, 27, 21 and 31, respectively. The overall detection rate of cancer was 61/126 (48.4%), and it was significantly higher in the combination cohort (56/79, 70.9%) compared with the SB only cohort (5/47, 10.6%, p

MRI fusion transperineal prostate biopsy is becoming more utilized because of its increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and decreased risk of sepsis. We present a video guide to properly perform this prostate biopsy technique using the Philips UroNav MRI fusion software. The MRI fusion transperineal prostate biopsy requires an ultrasound machine and transrectal ultrasound probe, MRI fusion machine, and a complete compliment of operating room supplies and staff. Local anesthesia is injected in the perineal subcutaneous tissue, prostate capsule apex, and prostate base near the seminal vesicles. Biopsy is performed through the grid plate and specimens are directly placed in formalin jars. The multitude of equipment and interfaces required by this procedure results in common problems in the setup, segmentation, and biopsy technique, which are addressed in the troubleshooting section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stejskal J, Hanáček V, Adamcová V, Zachoval R. Transperineal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Despite advances in imaging methods and the use of novel biomarkers, prostate biopsy still plays a vital part in prostate cancer diagnostics. Along with the widespread use of MRI/TRUS fusion guided biopsies we are recently witnessing a resurgence of transperineal approach in prostate biopsy. Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBxP) offers to avoid infectious complications by omitting the transrectal approach. Furthermore, TPBxP offers to improve the detection rate in the, sometimes undersampled, anterior part of the gland in patients after previous negative transrectal biopsies or with anterior prostate lesions visible on MRI. As TPBxP is not yet widely used in clinical practice, in this text we aim to offer a review of literature concerning TPBxP available in the PubMed database. According to the available data, TPBxP is easy to perform under general or local anaesthesia and is well tolerated by patients. Detection rate of prostate cancer is similar to that of the transrectal approach, except in the anterior parts of the prostate where TPBxP detects more cancer. TPBxP also seems to have less infectious complications and cases of rectal bleeding after biopsy. The incidence of other prostate biopsy complications is similar between transrectal and transperineal approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major statement: US/MRI fusion transperineal prostate biopsy has comparable yield and lower risk of infectious complications than transrectal biopsy. Purpose: Nowadays, prostate biopsies performed transperineally are gaining prominence. In our cohort, we retrospectively evaluated the yield of transperineally performed biopsies and at the same time their safety, especially with regard to infectious complications. Patients and methods: From January 2019 to March 2020, we performed 208 fusion US/MRI guided prostate biopsies - transperineally. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated by the PI-RADS vs 2 and vs 2.1 scoring systems, respectively. In biopsy naive patients we performed systematic biopsy from the peripheral zone and took at least three samples from the lesion described by the radiologist. In patients with repeated biopsy, we made a targeted biopsy with at least three samples from the lesion or lesions PI-RADS = 3, but we did not make a systematic biopsy. Results: The overall yield of the method in our group, regardless of the PI-RADS score, was 52.9 % of proven cancers in biopsy naive patients, of which 35.3 % were clinically insignificant and 17.6 % were clinically significant. In rebiopsy, 53.6 % of cancers were detected, of which 38.6 % were clinically insignificant and 15 % were clinically significant. When comparing the yield according to the PIRADS score, in the PI-RADS 3 group a total of 68.5 % were negative, 31.5 % positive (27.8 % insignificant and 3.7 % significant), in the PI-RADS 4 group it was 44.3 % negative and 55.7 % positive (41.8 % and 13.9 %, respectively), in the PI-RADS 5 group 22.9 % negative, 77.1 % positive (43.8 % and 33.3 %, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in the yield of biopsies (Chi-square test of independence for contingency tables, P < 0.001). We also assessed the complications of the procedure and we found that 182 patients underwent the procedure without any complications. As our main outcome measure, infectious complications, we recorded only two patients with dysuria, but without evidence of bacterial infection. Conclusion: The yield of transperineally performed prostate biopsy in our cohort corresponds to literature data. We have noticed a minimum of complications, and therefore we believe that biopsy performed this way is a safe alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To develop and validate a novel perineal nerve block approach for transperineal prostate biopsy.Patients and Methods: Five adult male cadavers were dissected to delineate the superficial and deep branches of the perineal nerve. Afterwards, 90 out of 115 patients were selected and randomly assigned to receive periprostatic, periapical triangle, or branches of perineal nerve (BPN) block. The primary outcome was the maximal pain intensity associated with transperineal prostate biopsy, which was assessed by the 10-point visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes included the number of biopsy with visual analog scale of ≥4 in each biopsy procedure, and the incidences of complications.Results: On the horizontal line of the upper anal border, the locations of the superficial branch of perineal nerve on the left and right sides were 1.87 ± 0.05 cm and 1.86 ± 0.06 cm, respectively; and the deep branch were 2.15 ± 0.07 cm and 2.16 ± 0.06 cm, respectively, from the midline, and lied between the deep layer of superficial fascia and prostate capsule. The number of cases finally enrolled in data analysis in periprostatic block, periapical triangle block, and BPN block groups were 26, 27, and 30, respectively. The maximal pain intensities were 3.4 (3.1-3.7), 3.3 (3.0-3.6), and 1.8 (1.5-2.2) in the 3 groups, respectively, and the numbers of biopsy with the pain intensity of ≥4 were 4.0 (3.2-4.9), 4.2 (3.3-5.2), and 0.7 (0.1-1.2), respectively. There were 4, 3 and 4 cases developing hematuria, and 1, 1 and 2 burdened with urine retention after biopsy in the 3 groups, respectively.Conclusion: Collectively, BPN block is a safe, effective and repeatable local anesthesia approach for transperineal prostate biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This IRB-approved prospective pilot study evaluates the safety and feasibility of performing stereotactic robot-assisted transperineal MRI-US fusion targeted prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia (LA) with sedation. 30 patients who underwent robotic transperineal prostate biopsy between September 2017 and June 2018 were recruited. All biopsies were performed with the iSR'obot Mona Lisa® and BK3000 ultrasound system. Intravenous paracetamol 1 g, with midazolam and fentanyl were given at positioning. After administration of 5 mL of 1%-lidocaine into the perineal skin 2 cm above and lateral to the anus, periapical prostatic block with 10 mL mixture of 1%-Lidocaine and 0.5%-Marcaine was given. The median age of patients was 66 years (range 53–80 years). Median PSA and mean prostate volume were 8.1 ng/ml (range 4.2–20.6 ng/ml) and 40.1 cc (range 18.6–70 cc). 24 (80.0%) patients had targeted prostate biopsy, with median number of targeted cores of 8 (range 5–16). All patients had saturation biopsy and median number of saturation cores was 21 (range 9–48). Mean dose of intravenous midazolam given was 1.5 mg (range 0–5 mg) and intravenous fentanyl was 75 mcg (10–150 mcg). No patient required conversion to GA. Two patients required motion compensation of 3 mm and 7.5 mm, respectively, due minor movement. Immediate post-operative pain score was 0 for all patients. 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) were discharged within 24 h of procedure. There were no immediate severe complications. Adenocarcinoma was detected in 19/30 (63.3%) cases. This pilot feasibility study showed that stereotactic robotic transperineal MRI-US fusion targeted prostate biopsy can be safely and accurately performed under LA with sedation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and financial implications of a decade of prostate biopsies performed in the UK National Health Service (NHS) through the transrectal (TR) vs the transperineal (TP) route. Methods: We conducted an evaluation of the TR vs the TP biopsy approach in the context of 28 days post‐procedure complications and readmissions. A secondary evaluation of burden of expenditure in NHS hospitals over the entire decade (2008–2019) was conducted through examination of national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Results: In this dataset of 486 467 prostate biopsies (387 879 TR and 98 588 TP biopsies), rates of infection and sepsis were higher for the TR compared to the TP cohort (0.53% vs 0.31%; P < 0.001, confidence interval 99%). Rates of sepsis have more than doubled for TR biopsies in the last 2 years compared to the previous decade (1.12% vs 0.53%). Infective complications were the main reasons for readmissions in the TR cohort, whereas urinary retention was the predominant reason for readmission in the TP cohort. Over the last decade, non‐elective (NEL) readmissions seem higher for the TP group; however, in the last 2 years these have reduced compared to the TR group (3.54% vs 3.74%). The cost estimates for NEL readmissions for the entire decade were £33,589,527.00 and £7,179,926.00 respectively, for TR and TP cohorts (P < 0.001). Estimated costs per patient readmission were £2,225.00 and £1,758.00 in the TR and TP groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Evaluation of nearly half a million prostate biopsies in the NHS over the entire decade gives sufficient evidence for the distinct advantages of the TP route over the TR route in terms of reduced infections and burden of expenditure. In addition, there is a potential for savings both in upstream and downstream costs if biopsy is performed under a local anaesthetic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To assess whether hemorrhagic complications associated with transperineal prostate biopsy increased in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. Methods In total, 598 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. The medication group comprised patients who took anti-thromboembolic agents, and the control group comprised those who did not take these agents. No anti-thromboembolic agent was stopped before, during, or after prostate biopsy in the medication group. Complications developing in both groups were compared and classified using the modified Clavien classification system. Subgroup analyses to compare complications in patients taking single antiplatelet, single anticoagulant, and dual antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, and multivariate analyses to predict bleeding risk were also performed. Results Of the 598 eligible patients, 149 comprised the medication group and 449 comprised the control group. Hematuria (Grade I) developed in 88 (59.1%) and 236 (52.5%) patients in the medication and control group, respectively (p = 0.18). Clot retention (Grade I) was more frequently observed in the medication group than the controls (2.0% versus 0.2%, respectively, p

Background Local anesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy (LATP) is a widely used diagnostic procedure for prostate cancer. As a diagnostic procedure, it should carry minimal risk. However, morbidity resulting from prostate biopsy is frequent. Prostate biopsy, like any other intervention, carries a significant risk of various infections, ranging from urinary tract infections (UTIs) to potentially life-threatening conditions like sepsis. Aim This study examined the rate of infections following a prostate biopsy at a single center and sought to identify risk factors that could increase the likelihood of developing an infection. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on all 168 patients who underwent LATP biopsy between 01/04/2022 and 01/04/2023. Data were collected from the Clinical Record and Reporting System (CRRS). Patient characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, the main indication for the biopsy, number of cores taken, antibiotic prophylaxis, and comorbidities were analyzed. The inclusion criteria encompassed all patients receiving this procedure within the specified timeframe, without restrictions on age, underlying health conditions, or medical history. No exclusion criteria were applied, aiming to comprehensively analyze and capture the full spectrum of patient outcomes and characteristics associated with these biopsies during the study period. Results In terms of socio-demographics, all patients were male with an average age (mean) of 65.5 years, a mean PSA level of 13.9 ng/dL, and an average prostate volume of 66.1 mL. On average, 23.2 biopsy cores were taken. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis, mainly ciprofloxacin. Despite this, 1.78% of patients (n=3) developed post-biopsy infections. Two of these patients had diabetes mellitus, and two had a large prostate volume of 95 mL., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire issued approval 9579. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Khalabazyane et al.)

Introduction A transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) under local anaesthetics (LA) after a prostate MRI scan is the gold standard for performing a prostate biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer. It has superseded transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). Historically, TRUSB by definition was performed in a contaminated environment and was routinely covered with antibiotics to reduce the risks of infection. Despite this, the rate of post-biopsy urosepsis has been documented to be as high as 5% in some series. In the transition from TRUSB to the establishment of a TPB under LA service in our unit, we continued to use a single dose of oral antibiotics for all patients attending for biopsy. The aim of this study is to establish whether the use of single-dose antibiotics has any effect on morbidity rates post-TPB. Methods A retrospective analysis of complications was carried out on 326 consecutive patients, who underwent TPB over a six-month period. One cohort of patients were biopsied with no antibiotic cover (n=149, 45.7%) as compared to another cohort who were given a single dose of oral antibiotics (n=177, 54.3%). Those patients in the group receiving antibiotics received either a single dose of co-amoxiclav or a single dose of ciprofloxacin. Patients with indwelling urethral catheters or with a urinary tract infection (UTI) were excluded from the analyses. All patients were followed- up after a multidisciplinary team meeting discussion (MDT) with either a telephone or a face-to-face consultation. Results A total of 324 (99.4%) patients did not report post-procedural complications. Two patients from the antibiotic group presented with infectious complications (1.1%); one patient was admitted with a prostate abscess and required drainage under general anaesthesia, and another was admitted with urosepsis requiring intravenous antibiotics. In the group who did not receive antibiotics, there were no complications reported, which was not significantly different compared to the antibiotic group (p=0.50). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the routine use of single-dose antibiotics with TPB does not affect morbidity rates. On the basis of this investigation, we have now stopped using routine antibiotic cover for patients undergoing an LA TPB., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Dryhurst et al.)

Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection by facilitating targeted biopsy (cognitive, fusion technology, or in-gantry MRI guidance) and reducing negative biopsies. This study sought to describe the feasibility of introducing an mpMRI-based triage pathway, including diagnostic performance, applicability to training, and cost analysis. Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients attending a large public tertiary referral training hospital who underwent mpMRI for suspicion of prostate cancer was considered. Standard clinical, MRI-related, histopathological, and financial parameters were collected for analysis of biopsy avoidance, diagnostic accuracy of biopsy approach, and operator (consultant and resident/registrar) and logistical (including financial) feasibility. Results: 653 men underwent mpMRI, of which 344 underwent prostate biopsy resulting in a 47% biopsy avoidance rate. Overall, 240 (69.8%) patients were diagnosed with PCa, of which 208 (60.5%) were clinically significant, with higher rates of csPCa observed for higher PIRADS scores. In patients who underwent both systematic and targeted biopsy (stTPB), targeted cores detected csPCa in 12.7% and 16.6% in more men than systematic cores in PIRADS 5 and 4, respectively, whereas systematic cores detected csPCa in 5% and 3.2% of patients, where targeted cores did not. A high standard of performance was maintained across the study period and the approach was shown to be cost effective. Conclusions: Introdution of an mpMRI-based triage system into a large public tertiary teaching hospital is feasible, cost effective and leads to high rates of prostate cancer diagnosis while reducing unnecessary biopsies and detection of insignificant PCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate a five-step training model for transperineal prostate biopsies (TPPB) and the differences in terms of the detection rate (DR) and the ease of execution when using either the "fan technique" (FT) or the use of a Free Hand technique (FH). Methods: A prospective observational randomised study was conducted from September 2015 to November 2017. Six naïve residents, who underwent the same five-steps training model, were randomly subdivided into two different groups of three residents based on the selected TPPB technique: A (FT) and B (FH). Patient characteristics (age, PSA, prostatic volume, DRE, MRI), intraoperative (operative time, number of samples) and postoperative parameters (histologic, pain) were evaluated in the 2 groups. The overall and stratified DR for PSA ranges and prostate volume (PV), operative time and complications were compared. Results: The overall detection rate was very high in both groups (FT 58.2% vs FH 59.6%) and not statistically different between the two techniques. There were no differences in terms of complication rates and pain. The FH showed a better detection rate in prostates smaller than 40 cc (p = 0.023) and a faster operative time (p = 0.025) compared to FT. Conclusions: Within the TPPB, FH is associated with a higher detection rate in patients with prostate < 40 cc compared to an FT when performed by inexperienced trainees. Standardised training organised in consecutive steps seems to contribute to the achievement of overall high detection rates with both methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between TRUSguided transrectal prostate biopsy (TR) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TP) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The two biopsy methods were evaluated in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and of early and late complications. Methods: This retrospective study was realized through the review of clinical records of 219 men that received a prostate biopsy between 2004 and 2014. The biopsy was performed because of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination findings (DRE), abnormal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings and symptoms due to prostate diseases. The cohort study was subdivided in two groups: 108 patients received a transrectal biopsy between 2004 and 2006 and 111 received a transperineal biopsy between 2007 and 2014. In both groups, first biopsy was performed with 12 cores scheme whereas second or third biopsy were performed with 18 cores scheme; in this study we excluded patients who underwent to biopsies with different number cores to reduce the bias. Both groups were evaluated on the basis of age, total PSA, PSA ratio (F/T), DRE/TRUS findings, presence/absence of low urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS), presence/absence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), histologic findings of biopsy cores and immediate/postoperative complications. Then, it was evaluated the overall cancer detection rate and the stratified cancer rate on the basis of the previous reported parameters. Finally, we analyzed the early and late complication rate in both groups. U Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the quantitative variables and χ2-test or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 66 cancers were detected in 219 patients of the study; 29 cancers were detected in the TP group and 37 in the TR group. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall cancer rate detected in both groups (26.13% e 34.26% respectively; p = 0.190). However, TP biopsy detected more cancers at first biopsy than TR biopsy (89.7% vs 78.4% respectively; p = 0.021). Moreover, TP biopsy detected more cancers in those patients with low cancer suspect (PSA < 4 ng/ml, F/T > 15%, negative TRUS), instead TR biopsy had more sensitivity in detecting cancer in those patients with high cancer suspect (PSA > 10 ng/ml, F/T < 15%, TRUS with abnormal lesions). The presence of BPH did not influence sensitivity in both cases. There were no significant differences in the early complication rate whereas a statistically significant difference was observed in the late complication rate (4% vs 11% in TP and TR biopsy, respectively; p = 0.019). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in sensitivity were observed between TP and TR biopsy, but TP biopsy detected more cancers at first time biopsy. Complications rate was lower in the TP group. Therefore, we conclude that the Urologist has the final choice in deciding the most appropriate biopsy technique, considering sensitivity and complications.

Background and objectives: Overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and the need for repeated procedures caused by transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies and their related complications places a heavy burden on healthcare systems. This was a prospective cohort validating study to access the clinical accuracy of systematic and MRI-cognitive targeted transperineal prostate biopsies in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer after a previous negative biopsy and persistent suspicion of malignancy. The primary goal was to assess the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect clinically significant prostate cancer with an additional goal to assess the diagnostic value of systematic and MRI-cognitive transperineal biopsies. Materials and Methods: In total, 200 patients were enrolled who had rising serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels for at least 4 months after a previous negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy. All eligible men underwent 1.5T prostate mpMRI, reported using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2), followed by a 20-region transperineal prostate systematic biopsy and additional targeted biopsies. Results: Systematic 20-core transperineal prostate biopsies (TPBs) were performed for 38 (19%) patients. Systemic 20-core TPB with additional cognitive targeted biopsies were performed for 162 (81%) patients. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) was detected for 31 (15.5%) patients, of which 20 (64.5%) cases of csPC were detected by systematic biopsy, eight (25.8%) cases were detected by targeted biopsy, and three (9.7%) both by systematic and targeted biopsies. Conclusions: Cognitive mpMRI guided transperineal target biopsies increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer after a previously negative biopsy. However, in a repeat prostate biopsy setting, we recommend applying a cognitive targeted biopsy with the addition of a systematic biopsy.

Objectives: To investigate the value of second-opinion evaluation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by subspecialised uroradiologists at a tertiary centre for the detection of significant cancer in transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.Methods: Evaluation of prospectively acquired initial and second-opinion radiology reports of 158 patients who underwent MRI at regional hospitals prior to transperineal MR/untrasound fusion biopsy at a tertiary referral centre over a 3-year period. Gleason score (GS) 7-10 cancer, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value (±95 % confidence intervals) were calculated and compared by Fisher's exact test.Results: Disagreement between initial and tertiary centre second-opinion reports was observed in 54 % of cases (86/158). MRIs had a higher NPV for GS 7-10 in tertiary centre reads compared to initial reports (0.89 ± 0.08 vs 0.72 ± 0.16; p = 0.04), and a higher PPV in the target area for all cancer (0.61 ± 0.12 vs 0.28 ± 0.10; p = 0.01) and GS 7-10 cancer (0.43 ± 0.12 vs 0.2 3 ± 0.09; p = 0.02). For equivocal suspicion, the PPV for GS 7-10 was 0.12 ± 0.11 for tertiary centre and 0.11 ± 0.09 for initial reads; p = 1.00.Conclusions: Second readings of prostate MRI by subspecialised uroradiologists at a tertiary centre significantly improved both NPV and PPV. Reporter experience may help to reduce overcalling and avoid overtargeting of lesions.Key Points: • Multiparametric MRIs were more often called negative in subspecialist reads (41 % vs 20 %). • Second readings of prostate mpMRIs by subspecialist uroradiologists significantly improved NPV and PPV. • Reporter experience may reduce overcalling and avoid overtargeting of lesions. • Greater education and training of radiologists in prostate MRI interpretation is advised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]