Strzałka, Piotr, Czemerska, Magdalena, Krawiec, Kinga Michalina, Szydłowska, Sylwia, Mikulski, Damian, Pluta, Agnieszka, and Wierzbowska, Agnieszka
Introduction: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) accounts for 15–30% of overall AML cases and is associated with shorter survival compared to de novo AML. The pathogenetic spectrum of sAML is heterogeneous, i.e. therapy- -related AML (tAML) arises from prior cytotoxic, radiation, or immunosuppressive therapy, while myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN)-AML develops from a previous clonal disorder of hematopoiesis. Material and methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of MDS/MPN-AML and tAML patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 in the Hematology Department of the Medical University in Lodz, Poland. Simul- taneously, demographic data, clinical factors, and laboratory findings were collected. For statistical analysis, we used Cox proportional hazard models and log-rank tests. Results: The study included 110 patients with either MDS/MPN-AML (n = 78) or tAML (n = 32), with a median age of 66 years (range 31–86). The median follow-up was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–5.3]. The median overall survival (OS) for MDS/MPN-AML patients was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5–7.0) and for tAML it was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.6– –5.6). In multivariate Cox regression model for OS, factors such as age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00– –1.06), higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (HR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.08–3.15), hypoalbuminemia (HR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.95–5.24) and percentage of bone marrow blasts infiltration (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03) were independent predictors of poor survival for the whole cohort. On the other hand, the intensive treatment approach was related to longer survival (HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21–0.82). There were no differences in OS between MDS/MPN-AML and tAML (p= 0.81). Conclusion: The poor treatment outcomes for sAML consist of a combination of low response rate and high early mortality. The positive influence of intensive chemotherapy should be highlighted, but nevertheless, optimizing treat- ment for this high-risk subpopulation remains crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]