Search

The Health Resources and Services Administration created the Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) in 2015 to address future geriatric workforce challenges and redefine the delivery of care to older adults. The John A. Hartford Foundation subsequently funded the GWEP Coordinating Center (GWEP-CC) to offer centralized, strategic support to these 44 diverse GWEP sites. This article outlines the last 3 years of GWEP work done at the national and local levels to transform geriatric care. Dissemination of the innovative Geriatric Interprofessional Team Transformation in Primary Care program, created by the Dartmouth GWEP, demonstrates how the GWEP-CC can benefit local initiatives and inform national perspectives. The GWEP-CC is a change agent in this way, scaling and distributing information and implementation support across the country. The GWEP-CC also serves as an essential repository of data, continuously determining what is working and what could be improved. This informs activity of the GWEP-CC, funders and other stakeholders, and provides the most up-to-date resources to GWEP sites and their partners. The GWEP-CC achieves its objectives through several key pillars: networking opportunities, education and training, advocacy, and evaluation. Although many advances have been made, opportunities to continue paving the way are plenty, especially with regards to mental health. This article discusses the work accomplished to date and presents some future considerations for mental health and overall healthcare transformation., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

After passage of the 21st Century Cures Act, the National Institutes of Health held a workshop in 2017 to consider expanding its inclusion policy to encompass individuals of all ages. American Geriatrics Society (AGS) leaders and members participated in the workshop and formal feedback period. AGS advocacy clearly impacted the resulting workshop report and Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy that eliminates upper-age limits for research participation unless risk justified and changes the language used to describe older adults and other vulnerable groups. AGS recommendations that were not specifically stated in the updated policy were to encourage active recruitment of older adults, add standard measures of function and/or frailty, and change review criteria to ensure the health status of a study population mirrors typical clinical populations. The updated inclusion policy ultimately offers academic geriatrics programs the opportunities to expand knowledge about health in aging and to continue to provide leadership for research and advocacy efforts on behalf of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:211-217, 2019., (© 2019 The American Geriatrics Society.)

In July 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rule for calendar year 2019 (MPFS2019). The proposal sets forth CMS-recommended updates to Medicare payment policies, payment rates, and quality provisions for services provided in the next calendar year. From year to year, the rule also can serve as a vehicle for soliciting input on new payment proposals and changes to existing policies. Among the payment and quality proposals in the MPFS2019 proposal, CMS proposed extensive changes to Current Procedural Terminology codes that are the framework for documentation and payment for office-based evaluation and management (E/M) services. The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) believes the proposed payment methodology changes for E/M services would have had a significant negative impact on care for older Americans. On September 10, 2018, the AGS submitted its comments on this proposal and other aspects of the rule, and the AGS also submitted a comment letter signed by 41 organizations from an AGS-led multispecialty coalition. The coalition also worked collaboratively on outreach to Congress, which included visits to Capitol Hill and a coalition letter stressing our collective support for reducing the burden of documentation for clinicians and our opposition to the proposed changes in payment methodology. In all letters, we noted that the AGS and members of our coalition hoped to work collaboratively with CMS and other stakeholders to develop a refined approach that would achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, particularly frail older Americans with multiple chronic conditions. In releasing their final MPFS2019, CMS postponed the E/M coding collapse for at least two years, a decision that speaks to the hard work of the AGS, its members, and the multi-specialty coalition, and which opens the door for further discussions about the future of payment for E/M services so critical to older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:145-150, 2019., (© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.)