Search

The growing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) worldwide has sparked the implementation of national policies to support the growing burden among caregivers of AD/dementia patients. This study aims to quantify and compare the burden of AD/dementia caregivers and evaluate how different living arrangements might impact health outcomes among caregivers in Japan, five European countries (5EU) and the United States (US). This is a cross-sectional study based on existing data from the 2018 National Health and Wellness Survey. Health outcome measures included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health state utilities, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and measurement of depression and anxiety amongst AD/dementia caregivers and non-caregivers. Pairwise comparisons between AD/dementia caregivers in Japan, 5EU and the US were conducted. Multivariate analysis was used to compare across groups within each region, with adjustment for potential confounding effects. A higher proportion of caregivers of AD/dementia patients in Japan were 65 years or older as compared to 5EU and US. On the contrary, female caregivers were significantly higher in the US than Japan and 5EU. The HRQoL and health state utilities index scores amongst AD/dementia caregivers were highest in Japan and lowest in the US. Caregivers in Japan incurred the lowest WPAI among the three regions. The proportion of AD/dementia patients reportedly living in an institution was highest in Japan as compared to US and EU. Notably, US caregivers whose patients lived in an institution experienced significantly less caregiving burden as compared to caregivers whose patients lived in the community. The caregiving burden among AD/dementia caregivers were substantial across the three regions, with similarities and differences between the West and Japan. The lower caregiving burden in Japan was potentially associated with national policies supporting long-term healthcare and institutionalized nursing care facilities for AD/dementia patients.

The growing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) worldwide has sparked the implementation of national policies to support the growing burden among caregivers of AD/dementia patients. This study aims to quantify and compare the burden of AD/dementia caregivers and evaluate how different living arrangements might impact health outcomes among caregivers in Japan, five European countries (5EU), and the United States (US). This is a cross-sectional study based on existing data from the 2018 National Health and Wellness Survey. Health outcome measures included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health state utilities, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and measurement of depression and anxiety amongst AD/dementia caregivers and non-caregivers. Pairwise comparisons between AD/dementia caregivers in Japan, 5EU, and the US were conducted. Multivariate analysis was used to compare across groups within each region, with adjustment for potential confounding effects. A higher proportion of caregivers of AD/dementia patients in Japan were 65 years or older as compared to 5EU and US. On the contrary, female caregivers were significantly higher in the US than Japan and 5EU. The HRQoL and health state utilities index scores amongst AD/dementia caregivers were highest in Japan and lowest in the US. Caregivers in Japan incurred the lowest WPAI among the three regions. The proportion of AD/dementia patients reportedly living in an institution was highest in Japan as compared to the US and EU. Notably, US caregivers whose patients lived in an institution experienced significantly less caregiving burden as compared to caregivers whose patients lived in the community. The caregiving burden among AD/dementia caregivers was substantial across the three regions, with similarities and differences between the West and Japan. The lower caregiving burden in Japan was potentially associated with national policies supporting long-term healthcare and institutionalized nursing care facilities for AD/dementia patients.

As the population in Japan is rapidly aging, the prevalence of dementia, particularly Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), is expected to increase, resulting in a growing need for caregivers. This study aims to quantify and compare the humanistic burden of caregivers of AD/dementia patients with caregivers of patients with other conditions in Japan. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2018 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Outcome measures included the Short-Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) for health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), EuroQol 5-dimension scale (EQ-5D) for health states utilities, impact of health on productivity and activity, and evaluation of depression and anxiety. Multivariate analysis was used to compare across groups, with adjustment for potential confounding effects. A total of 805 caregivers of AD/dementia patients, 1,099 other caregivers, and 27,137 non-caregivers were identified. Both AD/dementia caregivers and other caregivers had lower HRQoL and EQ-5D scores, higher total activity impairment, and more caregivers tended to experience anxiety than non-caregivers. There were no significant differences in the involvment in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) between AD/dementia caregivers and caregivers of other conditions. Notably, AD/dementia caregivers were more involved in making treatment decisions and finance management than other caregivers. Among AD/dementia caregivers caring for one patient, 395 patients lived in the community and 282 in an institution. AD/dementia caregivers whose patients lived in the community were more significantly involved in basic and instrumental ADL. Caregivers of patients with both AD/dementia and cancer had higher caregiving burden than caregivers of patients with either condition. Caregivers of AD/dementia patients in Japan reportedly experienced significant humanistic burden which is associated with patients’ living arrangements and the presence of an additional chronic condition. Therefore, provision of effective care/support is essential to relieve the burden experienced by the caregivers.

Patients with cancer experienced reduced health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), increased work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and indirect costs. With the current emphasis on economic evaluation of health technology in Japan, it is important to understand how indirect costs correlate with HRQoL and patient characteristics. It is also crucial to assess the patient characteristics associated with the HRQoL, WPAI, and indirect costs among patients with any types of cancer. This cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Respondents self-reported their HRQoL and WPAI by answering validated SF-12v2 and WPAI questionnaires, respectively. Indirect costs were derived using the human capital method. Correlation between HRQoL components and indirect costs were assessed using Spearman’s rank-order correlation. Correlation between patient characteristics and HRQoL, WPAI, and indirect costs were analyzed using generalized linear models. A total of 1,540 patients with any types of cancer, 254 with breast cancer, and 144 with colorectal cancer were included in the analyses. There was significant negative correlation between the indirect costs and HRQoL components among patients with any types of cancer. Patients with lower comorbid burden, higher household income, employed, married, or living with partner, never smokers, and exercised tended to have higher HRQoL. Being never smokers, having lower comorbid burden, normal weight, and exercised were associated with lower WPAI measures. Additionally, patients who were older, not married, not obese, and not smoking tended to incur lower indirect costs. The negative correlation between HRQoL and indirect costs among patients with cancer emphasized the needs to improve health outcomes and reduce indirect costs of patients. The factors associated with cancer burden identified in this study provide insights to allow targeted intervention to improve HRQoL and lessen the WPAI and indirect cost among cancer patients in Japan.

Aims: Understanding the burden of cancer in Japan is becoming increasingly important to address the socio-economic consequences of the disease. This study broadly examined the cancer burden in terms of: Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), stress-related comorbidities, and indirect costs in patients diagnosed with (i) any type of cancer, (ii) breast cancer, (iii) colorectal cancer, compared to controls without cancer. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Patient outcomes included self-reported stress-related comorbidities, HRQoL assessed by Short Form 12-item Health Survey and EuroQoL 5-dimension scale (EQ-5D), and work productivity and indirect costs assessed by WPAI questionnaire. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes across groups. An ad-hoc analysis compared respondents currently and currently not receiving prescription medication (Rx). Results: A total of 1,540 patients with any type of cancer, 254 with breast cancer, 144 with colorectal cancer were included in the analyses and compared to 28,070 controls without cancer. After adjusting for potential confounding effects patients with any type of cancer had significantly lower mental component summary scores (45.70 vs. 46.45, p = .003), physical component summary scores (48.95 vs. 50.02, p vs. 0.79, p vs. 2.68% p Conclusions: Japanese cancer patients experience a significantly decreased HRQoL, increased absenteeism and higher odds ratio for stress-related comorbidities. This has implications for future policy making and Health Technology Assessment in Japan.

Aims: As the number of cancer patients increases in Japan, and people are living longer with cancer, the need for caregivers of cancer patients is expected to increase substantially. This study intended to reveal the humanistic and economic burden among caregivers of cancer patients, and to compare it with the burden among caregivers of patients with other conditions (other caregivers) and non-caregivers. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional analysis used data from the Japan National Health and Wellness Survey 2017. Outcome measures included the Short Form 12-item Health Survey for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), EuroQol 5-dimension scale (EQ-5D) for health states utilities, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire for the impact of health on productivity and activity, and indirect costs. Multivariate analysis was used to compare across groups, with adjustment for potential confounding effects. Results: A total of 251 caregivers of cancer patients, 1,543 other caregivers, and 27,300 non-caregivers were identified. Caregivers of cancer patients (average 48.0 years old) tended to be younger than non-caregivers (51.5) and other caregivers (54.4) and had the highest education level (57.8% completed university education). Fewer non-caregivers had stress-related comorbidities than caregivers. Non-caregivers had significantly higher EQ-5D index scores than caregivers (average 0.81 vs. 0.73 vs. 0.74). Caregivers of cancer patients had significantly lower mental component summary scores than non-caregivers (40.18 vs. 46.70), and the difference indicated a clinically meaningful decrease in HRQoL. Caregivers of cancer patients had significantly higher presenteeism (37.31% vs. 20.43%), total work productivity impairment (38.85% vs. 21.98%), and activity impairment (40.94% vs. 25.78%) than non-caregivers. Additionally, caregivers of cancer patients had significantly higher total indirect costs (36.34% vs. 20.03% of average annual income). Conclusions: These results have implications for future healthcare planning, suggesting the importance of healthcare systems in Japan to consider the substantial burden borne by caregivers of cancer patients.

Supplemental Material, HTA_Survey_Form for Health Technology Assessment in Japan: A Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective by Kaori Kido, Naoki Matsumaru, and Katsura Tsukamoto in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science