Search

Onychomycosis, a superficial fungal infection, develops when dermatophytes infect nail plate and beds. Fosravuconazole l‐lysine ethanolate (F‐RVCZ), a fourth‐generation azole antifungal agent with potent antifungal activity and few drug interactions, was highly effective in a clinical trial, with a complete cure rate of 59.4% at 48 weeks after treatment initiation. However, some patients were not completely cured. To achieve a higher complete cure rate, additional therapy needs to be examined. We aimed to examine (i) the criteria for additional F‐RVCZ therapy in patients with an inadequate response to initial F‐RVCZ treatment for onychomycosis; (ii) the timing of additional therapy; and (iii) the effects of additional treatment. This was a multicenter, open‐label, three‐arm randomized clinical trial. Patients with onychomycosis were orally administered an approved dose of F‐RVCZ for 12 weeks, and its efficacy was assessed at week 24. Patients who demonstrated ≥55% reduction in nail involvement ratio at week 24 were included in Group X and followed up. Patients with <55% reduction were randomly assigned to follow‐up (Group A) or additional treatment (Group B) groups. The complete cure rate at week 72 in Group X was 73.3%. In Groups A and B, the complete cure rates were 29.6% and 46.7%, respectively, and were significantly different (P = 0.0414, odds ratio 2.08). During the study, 63 adverse drug reactions were recorded in 59 of the 318 patients (18.6%), for which a causal relationship with F‐RVCZ could not be ruled out. In Group B, three of 75 patients (4.0%) experienced three adverse drug reactions, all observed during additional treatment; none were serious. A high complete cure rate is possible without additional F‐RVCZ treatment when nail involvement decreases by ≥55% at week 24; however, when the reduction is <55% at week 24, additional F‐RVCZ treatment should be considered to improve the cure rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Onychomycosis can be treated with topical and oral medications. However, it is important to appropriately select these medications according to the type and severity of the disease and ensure treatment is continued for the recommended duration. In Japan, treatment options for onychomycosis have increased in recent years. Moreover, in 2019, the guidelines for dermatomycosis treatment were revised. In this study, we conducted a receipt survey to clarify the actual treatment status of onychomycosis cases as indicated by the continuation rates of prescribed treatment drugs, together with a web‐based survey to ascertain the prescribing policy of dermatologists regarding drugs for onychomycosis treatment. In agreement with past surveys, this receipt survey showed that the prescription continuation rate for oral medications was higher than that for topical medications. The 1‐year prescription continuation rate for topical onychomycosis medications was found to be low (<10%). The web‐based survey showed that the percentage of physicians who prescribed oral medications as their first choice increased by approximately 10% for each disease type, compared with the results of the previous survey conducted around 7 years ago. However, the study also confirmed that topical drugs are still prescribed for some disease types for which oral drugs are better suited. To ensure complete cure without patient drop‐out, oral drugs with a high probability of achieving complete cure and a high continuation rate should be prescribed for patients with onychomycosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor adherence to medication is a major public health challenge. Here, we aimed to determine the adherence to oral and topical medications and to analyze underlying associated factors using the translated Japanese version of Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 regarding urticaria treatment. Web-based questionnaires were performed for 3096 registered dermatological patients, along with a subanalysis of 751 registered urticaria patients in this study. The adherence to oral medication was significantly associated with the frequency of hospital visits. Variables that affected the adherence to topical medication included age and experience of drug effectiveness. The rate of responses that "It felt like the symptoms had improved" varied significantly among the dermatological diseases treated with oral medications. Dermatologists should be aware that adherence to the treatment of urticaria is quite low. Regular visits and active education for patients with urticaria are mandatory in order to achieve a good therapeutic outcome by increasing the adherence.

BackgroundPatients' high adherence to medication is indispensable for the management of skin diseases including atopic dermatitis. We previously showed poor medication adherence in Japanese dermatological patients.ObjectiveThis study was conducted to determine the level of adherence to oral or topical medication in Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis, attempting to characterize the socioeconomic status of those patients with poor adherence.MethodsA web questionnaire survey on demographic data as well as adherence level was conducted on patients registered in the monitoring system. Adherence level was assessed with Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). Among a total of 3096 respondents with dermatological disorders, data of 1327 subjects with atopic dermatitis were extracted and analyzed.ResultsMore than 80% of subjects felt that both oral and topical medications were safe and efficacious, while less than 60% of them were satisfied with their treatment. Levels of adherence to oral and topical treatments were evaluated with MMAS-8, giving scores of 4.6 and 4.2, respectively. Demographic factors such as gender, marital status, state of employment, alcohol consumption, frequency of hospital visits, and experience of drug effectiveness had a significant impact on the degree of adherence to treatment.ConclusionMedication adherence level in Japanese subjects with atopic dermatitis was relatively low compared with that of other chronic diseases. Our survey has characterized patients with poor adherence, who are good targets for interventions to maximize potentially limited healthcare resources.

Previously we assessed the medication adherence for oral and topical remedies by a translated Japanese version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) together with socioeconomic backgrounds in 3096 Japanese dermatological patients, and found the medication adherence, especially to topical drugs, was poor in these patients. In order to elucidate the disease-specific sociomedical factors, we further sub-analyzed the medication adherence in 237 psoriasis patients and compared it with that in other dermatological diseases such as atopic dermatitis, urticaria or tinea. This study was conducted among patients registered in monitoring system and 3096 eligible patients were enrolled. Our web-based questionnaire included the following items such as age, sex, annual income, main health-care institution, experience of effectiveness by oral or topical medication, overall satisfaction with treatment, and MMAS-8 for oral or topical medication. Mean adherence score by MMAS-8 was 5.2 for oral and 4.3 for topical medication. More patients with psoriasis used a university hospital and fewer used a private clinic compared with those with the other skin disease patients. Experience of drug effectiveness by oral medication and overall satisfaction with treatment was lower in psoriasis patients than in other patients. In oral medication, significantly better adherence was observed in those of higher age and with higher annual income. The adherence to medication, especially to topical drugs, was poor in 237 psoriasis patients. We speculated that some severe psoriasis patients were not sufficiently treated systemically and were resistant to topical therapy, leading to poor adherence.

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL‐31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti‐IL‐4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti‐IL‐31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti‐IL‐13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board‐certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Four‐colored fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an ancillary diagnostic tool for melanoma. However, most studies that have investigated the usefulness of FISH primarily focused on advanced melanomas. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of FISH in distinguishing acral melanoma (AM) in situ from benign acral junctional nevus (AJN), two types of lesions that are difficult to differentiate via traditional clinical means. The authors investigated the usefulness of FISH in 91 acral melanocytic lesions, including 50 lesions with diagnostic discrepancies between dermoscopic and pathologic approaches or difficulty diagnosing between AM in situ and AJN, on the volar skin of Japanese patients. The authors classified the lesions based on the diagnosis of dermatologists and pathologists into four groups: (I) lesions with a unanimous diagnosis by dermatologists and pathologists as AM in situ or AJN (n = 41); (II) lesions with a unanimous diagnosis by dermatologists only as AM in situ or AJN (n = 21); (III) lesions with a unanimous diagnosis by pathologists only as AM in situ or AJN (n = 15); and (IV) all other lesions (n = 14). The dermatologists diagnosed the lesions by clinical and dermoscopic photographs alone, while the pathologists diagnosed the lesions by microscopy of hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides alone. In group I (AM in situ [n = 20] and AJN [n = 21]), four‐colored FISH demonstrated 90% sensitivity and 81% specificity in distinguishing AM in situ from AJN. There was a significant correlation between the FISH results and the unanimous diagnoses by pathologists alone (p = 0.03) in group III. However, FISH results were not significantly correlated with the unanimous diagnoses by dermatologists alone (p = 0.33) in group II. In conclusion, the four‐colored FISH probe kit was useful in distinguishing between AM in situ and AJN and may be an ancillary method when pathologists who are not experts of dermatopathology diagnose melanocytic lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is the English version of guidance for the use of oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Several cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)‐4, IL‐13, IL‐22, IL‐31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and interferon‐γ, are involved in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. As oral JAK inhibitors hinder the JAK‐signal transducers and activators of transcription signal transduction routes involved in the signal transduction of these cytokines, they may be effective for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. In Japan, as oral JAK inhibitors for atopic dermatitis, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, expanded its authorized indications for atopic dermatitis in 2020. Consequentially, a JAK1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, also expanded its indications to atopic dermatitis in 2021, followed by new approval of another JAK1 inhibitor, abrocitinib, for the use under the Japanese health insurance system. Physicians who intend to use them should sufficiently understand and comply with contents of guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to promote optimal use of these drugs. In the treatment with oral JAK inhibitors, it is important to sufficiently consider disease factors, treatment factors and patient backgrounds, and share them with patients to choose treatment options. Points to be considered for drug selection include the efficacy and safety of drugs, age of patients, and dosage and administration of the drug. This guidance was developed for board certified dermatologists, who are specialized in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, and for promoting proper use of oral JAK inhibitors, taking into account a variety of factors in individual patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses two cases of simultaneous infection in a couple caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) related to the USA300 clone. These cases highlight the rare occurrence of PVL-positive MSSA in Japan and the need for further research to understand the relationship between PVL-positive MSSA strains and the USA300 clone, as well as the importance of considering PVL-positive strains in the treatment of SSTIs caused by MSSA.

Summary: Background: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK 2 inhibitor, was shown to improve the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD and inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to ciclosporin A (CA). Methods: In this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase III study, patients were randomized 1: 1: 2: 1 to placebo (N = 93), baricitinib 1 mg (N = 93), 2 mg (N = 185) or 4 mg (N = 92) with background TCS. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg (+ TCS) vs. placebo + TCS who achieved ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. Results: Baricitinib 4 mg + TCS was superior to placebo + TCS for EASI 75 (4 mg: 32%, placebo: 17%, P = 0·031) at week 16 and for improvements in itch, skin pain and number of night‐time awakenings owing to itch. Improvements were maintained through 52 weeks of treatment. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with baricitinib than placebo (+ TCS); most were mild or moderate. The most frequent TEAEs with baricitinib 4 mg + TCS were nasopharyngitis, herpes simplex, influenza and headache. No deaths or deep vein thromboses were reported. Conclusions: Baricitinib 4 mg + TCS improved the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe AD through 52 weeks of treatment in patients with inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to CA. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of baricitinib in moderate‐to‐severe AD. What is already known about this topic?Ciclosporin A is indicated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis that is refractory to topical therapies. However, its use is limited by safety concerns and it may not provide adequate response for some patients.Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has been shown to improve the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis as a monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids. What does this study add?Baricitinib combined with background low‐ or moderate‐potency topical corticosteroids provided improvements in the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis through 1 year of treatment in patients with a contraindication, intolerance or failure to respond to ciclosporin A.The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events with baricitinib 4 mg were nasopharyngitis, herpes simplex, influenza and headache.The safety profile was consistent with previous studies in patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As lithium carbonate is frequently used for treating mania symptoms in bipolar disorder, we should recognize that it can cause serious drug eruptions including SJS. Dear Editor, A 56-year-old Japanese woman who had been suffering from bipolar disorder for 12 years developed erythema on the legs. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing lithium carbonate-induced SJS. [Extracted from the article]