Search

This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus carboplatin when used as a second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). From February 2002 to May 2003, 30 previously treated patients with adenocarcinoma of the breast received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin to an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1. The carboplatin dose was changed to an AUC of 4.5 because of toxicity, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Among 30 patients enrolled, 25 were assessable for response rate (RR). There was no complete response; 9 patients (30%) had partial response, for an overall RR of 30%. The median time to progression for the study group was 20.47 weeks (range, 8-46 weeks). Treatment-related toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia in 50% of patients (20% of whom had febrile neutropenia), grade 3/4 anemia in 26.6% of patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 30%. Eleven patients (36.67%) had grade 1 alopecia, and 1 patient (3.33%) had grade 2 alopecia. Moderate nausea was observed in 8 patients (26.67%), and vomiting occurred in 7 patients. Four patients had asthenia and 3 (10%) experienced stomatitis. Three patients discontinued treatment because of hematologic toxicity (thrombocytopenia) and 2 patients are still receiving treatment. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine is an active combination for patients with MBC despite significant but manageable hematologic toxicity.

Background: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone., Patients and Methods: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone., Results: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms., Conclusion: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

The objective of this study was to compare the relative in vitro cytotoxicity of bleomycin to that of two newer-generation analogues, tallysomycin S10b and liblomycin. The latter compound is of particular interest as it has recently been shown in preclinical studies to be free of a potential to cause pulmonary injury and yet to possess only a minor potential to produce myelotoxicity. Using the adhesive tumor cell culture system, we evaluated the activity of these three drugs against a panel of 13 human tumors of various types. The range of concentrations chosen was determined and normalized using a nonleukemic permanent mouse hematopoietic progenitor cell line. Those drug concentrations achieving 90% inhibition of growth (IC90) against the murine cell line were: 6.11 microM bleomycin; 7.53 microM tallysomycin S10b; and 0.6 microM liblomycin. When tested against fresh human tumors at equally myelotoxic IC90 concentrations, bleomycin and tallysomycin S10b (nonmyelotoxic compounds) both achieved 90% growth inhibition of all tumors, while liblomycin (a myelotoxic compound) produced an IC90 inhibition in 69% of all tumors. A comparison of drug IC90 values against individual fresh tumors indicated a correlation between bleomycin and its structurally related analogue tallysomycin S10b. No such correlation, however, was seen with liblomycin in comparison to either bleomycin or tallysomycin S10b. The relative activity of liblomycin versus that of bleomycin and tallysomycin S10b varied with individual tumors tested. The response rate of liblomycin, a myelotoxic compound within this normalized range, appears promising. These data represent the first comparison of liblomycin to bleomycin against a spectrum of fresh human tumors using a stem cell assay technique.

The subrenal capsule assay (SRA) seems to present some difficulties for the evaluation of the chemosensitivity of antineoplastic agents against fresh tumor xenografts. A study was therefore carried out to verify whether two different xenografts would behave in a similar way. Tumors such as melanoma provided adequate homogeneous material for this technique, while non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were heterogeneous since the 1 mm3 specimen grafted under the renal capsule usually contained diffuse areas of necrosis and of infection. Furthermore, a large proportion of the grafted specimens, 257 out of 298, did not contain any tumor at all on microscopic examination even when they showed macroscopic growth. Added to these discrepancies, a random microscopic analysis of 180 adjacent fragments of NSCLC and melanomas demonstrated that the variability of heterogeneous tumors precludes any meaningful comparison between homologous tumor tissues designed to be grafted on treated and on control mice. The anti-inflammatory effect of chemotherapeutic drugs on the host's reaction to the graft is probably responsible for the differences between the macroscopic growth results observed in pieces grafted to both treated and control mice: however, it could not be simulated by hydrocortisone (HC) under our experimental conditions. This allows us to conclude that fresh tumors from NSCLC cannot be used in SRA.