Search

Background & Aim: Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), specifically those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α biologics, are at high risk for vaccine-preventable infections. Their ability to mount adequate vaccine responses is unclear. The aim of the study was to assess serologic responses to messenger RNA-Coronavirus Disease 2019 vaccine, and safety profile, in patients with IBD stratified according to therapy, compared with healthy controls (HCs)., Methods: Prospective, controlled, multicenter Israeli study. Subjects enrolled received 2 BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) doses. Anti-spike antibody levels and functional activity, anti-TNFα levels and adverse events (AEs) were detected longitudinally., Results: Overall, 258 subjects: 185 IBD (67 treated with anti-TNFα, 118 non-anti-TNFα), and 73 HCs. After the first vaccine dose, all HCs were seropositive, whereas ∼7% of patients with IBD, regardless of treatment, remained seronegative. After the second dose, all subjects were seropositive, however anti-spike levels were significantly lower in anti-TNFα treated compared with non-anti-TNFα treated patients, and HCs (both P < .001). Neutralizing and inhibitory functions were both lower in anti-TNFα treated compared with non-anti-TNFα treated patients, and HCs (P < .03; P < .0001, respectively). Anti-TNFα drug levels and vaccine responses did not affect anti-spike levels. Infection rate (∼2%) and AEs were comparable in all groups. IBD activity was unaffected by BNT162b2., Conclusions: In this prospective study in patients with IBD stratified according to treatment, all patients mounted serologic response to 2 doses of BNT162b2; however, its magnitude was significantly lower in patients treated with anti-TNFα, regardless of administration timing and drug levels. Vaccine was safe. As vaccine serologic response longevity in this group may be limited, vaccine booster dose should be considered., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy drive treatment loss of response. An association between intestinal microbial composition and response to anti-TNF therapy was noted. We therefore aimed to assess the implications of antibiotic treatments on ADA formation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Design: We analysed data from the epi-IIRN (epidemiology group of the Israeli IBD research nucleus), a nationwide registry of all patients with IBD in Israel. We included all patients treated with anti-TNF who had available ADA levels. Survival analysis with drug use as time varying covariates were used to assess the association between antibiotic use and ADA development. Next, specific pathogen and germ-free C57BL mice were treated with respective antibiotics and challenged with infliximab. ADA were assessed after 14 days., Results: Among 1946 eligible patients, with a median follow-up of 651 days from initiation of therapy, 363 had positive ADA. Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated an increased risk of ADA development in patients who used cephalosporins (HR=1.97, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.44), or penicillins with β-lactamase inhibitors (penicillin-BLI, HR=1.4, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.74), whereas a reduced risk was noted in patients treated with macrolides (HR=0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.86) or fluoroquinolones (HR=0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35). In mice exposed to infliximab, significantly increased ADA production was observed in cephalosporin as compared with macrolide pretreated mice. Germ-free mice produced no ADA., Conclusion: ADA production is associated with the microbial composition. The risk of ADA development during anti-TNF therapy can possibly be reduced by avoidance of cephalosporins and penicillin-BLIs, or by treatment with fluoroquinolones or macrolides., Competing Interests: Competing interests: YC received research grants, speaker and advisory fees from AbbVie; speaker and advisory fees from Janssen; grant, speaker and advisory fees from Takeda and consultancy fees from CytoReason. SSO received grant funding from Takeda, holds equity and receives consultancy fees from CytoReason. SG-V declares CytoReason advisory fees for last 3 years. RK received consultation fee, research grant, royalties or honorarium from Takeda and Pfizer. ID received consultation fee, research grant or honorarium from Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Celgene/BMS, Arena, Neopharm, Gilead, Gallapagos, Celltrion, Ferring, Falk Pharma, MSD, DSM, Cambridge Healthcare, Sublimity, Sangamo, Nestle, Wild bio, Food Industries Association, Integran Holdings, Abbott, Altman Research, (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate., Aims: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success., Methods: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly., Results: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation., Conclusion: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by articular and extra-articular manifestations. Among extra-articular involvement, rheumatoid meningitis (RM) is a rare condition, which may exhibit variable symptoms including headache, focal and/or generalized neurologic deficits. It may develop as the preceding manifestation of RA or occur at any time of the disease course. Some drugs used for the treatment of RA may give rise to aseptic meningitis or create a tendency to infectious meningitis due to their immunosuppressive effect. All these possibilities may lead to difficulties in the differential diagnosis. Achieving a diagnosis in a short time is crucial in terms of prognosis. Here, we would like to report a case with longstanding RA manifested by left-sided weakness and seizure shortly after initiating etanercept (ETA) therapy. ETA-induced meningitis was confirmed with appropriate diagnostic tools. Our aim with this case-based review is to attract the attention of this rare condition and discuss diagnostic challenges., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

The impact of treatment on the risk of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is unclear. Here, we aimed to assess if the risk of lymphoma differs according to the type of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), comparing monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies to the soluble TNF receptor. We used B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF)-transgenic (Tg) mice as a model of autoimmunity-associated lymphoma. Six-month-old BAFF-Tg mice were treated with TNFi for 12 months. Histological examination of the spleen, assessment of the cellular composition of the spleen by flow cytometry and assessment of B cell clonality were performed at euthanasia. Crude mortality and incidence of lymphoma were significantly higher in mice treated with monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies compared to both controls and mice treated with the soluble TNF receptor, even at a high dose. Flow cytometry analysis revealed decreased splenic macrophage infiltration in mice treated with monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies. Overall, this study demonstrates, for the first time, that a very prolonged treatment with monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies increase the risk of lymphoma in B cell-driven autoimmunity. These data suggest a closer monitoring for lymphoma development in patients suffering from B cell-driven autoimmune disease with long-term exposure to monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies., (© 2021 British Society for Immunology.)

Immunogenicity related to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) is one of the causes for the decreased attainment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) may be playing a role in the development of immunogenicity. The objective of this study was to analyse the association of baseline concentration of serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) with immunogenicity after 6 months of TNFi treatment. A total of 127 patients with RA starting a TNFi (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol or golimumab) were followed-up for 6 months. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at 6 months and anti-drug antibody (ADA) and BAFF concentrations were measured. Logistic regression models were employed in order to analyse the association between BAFF concentrations and immunogenicity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the BAFF concentrations with a greater likelihood of showing immunogenicity association. At 6 months, 31 patients (24%) developed ADA. A significant interaction between the age and baseline BAFF concentration was found for the development of ADA (Wald chi-square value = 5.30; p = 0.02); therefore, subsequent results were stratified according to mean age (≤ / > 55 years). Baseline serum BAFF concentration was independently associated with ADA development only in patients over 55 years (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.03-2.21). Baseline serum BAFF ≥ 1034 pg/mL predicted the presence of ADA at 6 months (AUC = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.93; p = 0.001; positive likelihood ratio = 3.7). In conclusion, our results suggest that the association of BAFF concentration and immunogenicity depends on the patient's age. Baseline serum BAFF concentration predicts the presence of ADA within 6 months of TNFi therapy in older patients with RA.

Objectives: Hepatitis B (HBV) is a common comorbidity among rheumatic patients. The prevalence of HBV infection and the rate of reactivation remain unclear. The literature data suggested a higher risk in chronic than in past infection. Currently, the literature data are mostly focused on anti-TNF and rituximab. This retrospective observational study aimed to analyse the prevalence of HBV infection and the risk of viral reactivation in a population of rheumatic patients undergoing anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF agents., Methods: We analysed 1216 rheumatic patients, treated with both csDMARDs and bDMARDs between 2006 and 2017. Serologic markers for HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) were performed prior and during biologic treatment. Patients with chronic or resolved infection were monitored every 3 months., Results: The prevalence of HBV in our cohort was 15.7% (chronic infection: 0.4%, resolved infection: 12.6%, anti-HBc positivity alone: 2.6%). 12 (6.2%) out of 191 HBV infected patients experienced a reactivation. All of them showed markers of past infection. One patient experienced HBV reactivation despite lamivudine. Only one patient experienced acute hepatitis, probably due to the interruption of immunosuppressors in anticipation of surgery, not preceded by any HBV prophylactic treatment., Conclusions: HBV reactivation is a rare event in patients treated with a bDMARD and it can also occur while taking lamivudine, not only in chronic carriers (as per the literature data) but also in inactive ones. Regular screening followed by prompt treatment can prevent symptoms or complications. Due to the risk of hepatitis following the immune reconstitution, an antiviral therapy should be considered in the case of sudden discontinuation of csDMARDs or bDMARD.

Background: Inadequate systemic exposure to infliximab (IFX) is associated with treatment failure. This work evaluated factors associated with reduced IFX exposure in children with autoimmune disorders requiring IFX therapy., Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional prospective study IFX trough concentrations and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were measured in serum from children diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 73), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (n = 16), or uveitis (n = 8) receiving maintenance IFX infusions at an outpatient infusion clinic in a tertiary academic pediatric hospital. IFX concentrations in combination with population pharmacokinetic modeling were used to estimate IFX clearance. Patient demographic and clinical data were collected by chart review and evaluated for their relationship with IFX clearance., Results: IFX trough concentrations ranged from 0 to > 40 μg/mL and were 3-fold lower in children with IBD compared to children with JIA (p = 0.0002) or uveitis (p = 0.001). Children with IBD were found to receive lower IFX doses with longer dosing intervals, resulting in dose intensities (mg/kg/day) that were 2-fold lower compared to children with JIA (p = 0.0002) or uveitis (p = 0.02). Use of population pharmacokinetic analysis to normalize for variation in dosing practices demonstrated that increased IFX clearance was associated with ADA positivity (p = 0.004), male gender (p = 0.02), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = 0.02), elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.001), reduced serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.0005), and increased disease activity in JIA (p = 0.009) and IBD (p ≤ 0.08). No significant relationship between diagnosis and underlying differences in IFX clearance was observed. Multivariable analysis by covariate population pharmacokinetic modeling confirmed increased IFX clearance to be associated with anti-IFX antibody positivity, increased ESR, and reduced serum albumin concentrations., Conclusions: Enhanced IFX clearance is associated with immunogenicity and inflammatory burden across autoimmune disorders. Higher systemic IFX exposures observed in children with rheumatologic disorders are driven primarily by provider drug dose and interval selection, rather than differences in IFX pharmacokinetics across diagnoses. Despite maintenance IFX dosing at or above the standard recommended range for IBD (i.e., 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks), the dosing intensity used in the treatment of IBD is notably lower than dosing intensities used to treat JIA and uveitis, and may place some children with IBD at risk for suboptimal maintenance IFX exposures necessary for treatment response.

Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs have improved the prognosis for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) significantly. However, evidence for individual treatment decisions based on serum anti-TNF drug levels and the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) in children is scarce. We aimed to assess if anti-TNF drug levels and/or ADAbs influenced physician's treatment decisions in children with JIA., Methods: Patients' records in our center were retrospectively screened for measurements of anti-TNF drug levels and ADAbs in children with JIA using etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab. Clinical characteristics and disease activity were retrieved from patient charts., Results: We analyzed 142 measurements of anti-TNF drug levels in 65 children with JIA. Of these, ninety-seven (68.3%) were trough concentrations. N = 14/97 (14.4%) of these showed trough concentrations within the therapeutic drug range known for adults with RA and IBD. ADAbs against adalimumab were detected in seven patients and against infliximab in one patient. Seven (87,5%) of these ADAb-positive patients had non-detectable drug levels. A flowchart was made on decisions including rational dose escalation, stopping treatment in the presence of ADAbs and undetectable drug levels, showing that 45% of measurements influenced treatment decisions, which concerned 65% of patients (n = 42/65)., Conclusions: In the majority of patients, measurement of anti-TNF drug levels led to changes in treatment. A wide variation of anti-TNF drug levels was found possibly due to differences in drug clearance in different age groups. There is need for determination of therapeutic drug ranges and pharmacokinetic curves for anti-TNF and other biologics in children with JIA.

The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study (from December 2016 to October 2018) was to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence of adalimumab biosimilar HLX03 and reference adalimumab in healthy volunteers, and to assess safety, and immunogenicity of HLX03. The primary PK endpoints were maximum observed plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC 0-t ). Equivalence was determined if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric least square mean ratio between the two treatment groups were within the predefined range of 80%-125%. Safety and immunogenicity were monitored during the study. Healthy Chinese males (N = 220) were randomized 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous 40 mg dose of HLX03 or China (CN)-sourced adalimumab. The ratios of the geometric mean of C max and AUC 0-t were 102.2% and 105.7%, respectively, with corresponding 90% CIs falling in the predefined margins, which demonstrated PK equivalence between HLX03 and CN-adalimumab. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar in the two groups (73.8% and 66.0% in the HLX03 and CN-adalimumab groups, respectively). Grade 3-4 TEAEs were reported in 7.5% and 5.7% of participants, respectively. The incidences of participants with antidrug antibodies (HLX03: 96.2%; CN-adalimumab: 93.4%) or neutralizing antibodies (HLX03: 40.6%, CN-adalimumab: 41.4%) were comparable between groups. This study demonstrated PK bioequivalence between HLX03 and CN-adalimumab, with similar safety and immunogenicity profiles. These data support further clinical development of HLX03 as an adalimumab biosimilar., (© 2021 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Biologic drugs, especially anti-TNF, are considered as the gold standard therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. However, non-uniform efficacy, incidence of infections, and high costs are major concerns. Novel tissue-specific agents may overcome the current limitations of systemic administration, providing improved potency, and safety. We developed a bispecific antibody (BsAb), combining human arthritic joint targeting, via the synovial-specific single-chain variable fragment (scFv)-A7 antibody, and TNFα neutralization, via the scFv-anti-TNFα of adalimumab, with the binding/blocking capacity comparable to adalimumab -immunoglobulin G (IgG). Tissue-targeting capacity of the BsAb was confirmed on the human arthritic synovium in vitro and in a synovium xenograft Severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mouse model. Peak graft accumulation occurred at 48 h after injection with sustained levels over adalimumab-IgG for 7 days and increased therapeutic effect, efficiently decreasing tissue cellularity, and markers of inflammation with higher potency compared to the standard treatment. This study provides the first description of a BsAb capable of drug delivery, specifically to the disease tissue, and a strong evidence of improved therapeutic effect on the human arthritic synovium, with applications to other existing biologics., Competing Interests: CP is an author in a patent related to the A7 antibody. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Ferrari, Onuoha, Fossati-Jimack, Nerviani, Alves, Pagani, Deantonio, Colombo, Santoro, Sblattero and Pitzalis.)

Background/objective: SSS07, a humanized rabbit monoclonal antibody, can selectively block human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and relative immunogenicity of SSS07 after multiple single subcutaneous (SC) doses in healthy volunteers., Methods: A total of 71 healthy volunteers were randomized to six sequential ascending-dose groups (5, 15, 30, 50, 75, and 100 mg), and except for the 100 mg group that only had one subject who received a placebo, all of the other groups included two placebo-control subjects. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were assessed by physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiography (ECG), clinical laboratory tests, and plasma anti-drug antibody (ADA) over 28 days for each group. Their concentrations of TNF-α were also analyzed. Only after safety and tolerance were determined in the lower-dose groups was the next dose group initiated. The dose increments did not exceed 100 mg., Results: No serious adverse events or dose-limited toxicity (DLT) were observed, so 100 mg was defined as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Overall, 71 AEs and 59 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 36 (60.0%) and 30 (50.0%) volunteers, respectively, who received SSS07. All AEs and TRAEs were mild or moderate and expected based on previous results with similar types of drugs, without new safety concerns. Except for infections and administration site reactions, the frequency and intensity of the other TRAEs were similar for SSS07 and placebo. No severe acute immune reactions occurred. The lower dose's immunogenicity was stronger than the higher doses. The highest ADA titer was observed 3 to 6 months after administration., Conclusion: SSS07 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers. Higher immunogenicity was observed at low SSS07 concentration levels. The infections and administration site conditions might have been related to the immunogenicity and the degree of inhibition of TNF-α. However, the existence of ADA did not appear to affect the safety of the subjects throughout the follow-up period. These findings could support further investigations of treatments with humanized monoclonal antibodies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: In inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients, antibody-to-infliximab [ATI] generation is responsible for loss of response [LOR] and infusion reaction [IR] to infliximab. An immuno-therapeutic approach is considered an option to overcome LOR. Granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive apheresis [GMA] using an Adacolumn has been shown to have clinical efficacy together with immunomodulatory effects in IBD patients., Methods: We developed an ATI-CAI assay utilizing a C1q immobilized plate and applied it to measure ATI in patients who were receiving infliximab, including 56 with sustained response, 76 with LOR and six with IR. Furthermore, 14 patients with LOR and two with paradoxical skin reactions who received infliximab + GMA combination therapy were analysed., Results: Fourteen patients with LOR, seven with Crohn's disease and seven with ulcerative colitis, showed significantly improved clinical indices [p = 0.0009], and decreased ATI [p = 0.0171] and interleukin-6 [p = 0.0537] levels at week 8 following initiation of infliximab + GMA therapy. Nine patients who received combination therapy achieved remission, which was maintained to week 24 with infliximab alone. Additionally, cutaneous lesions in two patients with IR were improved. ATI-CAI assay efficiency was not influenced by infliximab concentration during the test. Pre- and post-infliximab infusion ATI levels were not different. Patients with ATI greater than the 0.153 μg/mL cut-off value were likely to experience LOR [odds ratio 3.0]., Conclusions: Patients who received infliximab + GMA therapy appeared to regain clinical response to infliximab by a decrease in ATI level. Furthermore, the concentration of infliximab in the test did not influence ATI measurement, but was associated with clinical response., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Issue recommendations on practical aspects of the monitoring of levels of biological drugs that may be useful for rheumatologists., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies in which drug and anti-drug antibody levels were determined in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) to study whether they could predict different outcomes. In light of the results of the review, a group of experts discussed under what circumstances testing biological drug levels and their antibodies could be useful. The discussion resulted in a series of clinical questions that were answered with the scientific evidence collected, and in algorithms that facilitate decision making., Results: It was established that the determination of drug levels can be especially useful in two clinical situations, on treatment failure (primary or secondary) and on sustained remission. It is also reviewed which laboratory technique and timing for sample drawing are the most suitable for the measurement. Recommendations are issued on the interpretation of drug levels and on factors to be taken into account (for example, body mass index and disease modifying drugs)., Conclusions: Evidence-based algorithms and guidelines have been established to test drug levels and anti-drug antibodies in patients with RA and SpA, which can help clinical decision making., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immunomodulators and anti tumor-necrosis-α antibodies (anti-TNFs) have been implicated in increased risk of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood., Methods: An in-vitro model of lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) was established by co-incubation of EBV-infected human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with Cyclosporin-A (CSA). After 4 weeks, the resultant LCLs were analyzed by flow cytometry, telomerase activity assay, and next generation sequencing. Subsequently, LCLs were explored in the presence of therapeutic agents for IBD (anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, 6-Mercaptopurine [6MP], methotrexate). Epstein-Barr virus titers were quantitated by real-time polymerase chain reaction., Results: In cultures of PBMC with EBV and CSA, LCLs were characterized as an expanded, long lived population of CD58+CD23hi B-cells with high telomerase activity and clonal expansion. Upon addition to the cell cultures, LCL percentages were higher with infliximab (median 19.21%, P = 0.011), adalimumab (median 19.85%, P = 0.003), and early washed-out 6MP (median 30.57%, P = 0.043) compared with PBMC with EBV alone (median 9.61%). However, vedolizumab had no such effect (median 8.97%; P = 0.435). Additionally, LCL expansion was accompanied by increase in intracellular, rather than extracellular, EBV viral copies. Compared with PBMC with EBV alone, high levels of LCL were subsequently observed after triple depletion of NK cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells (median 52.8% vs 16.4%; P = 0.046) but also in cultures depleted solely of CD4+ T cells (median 30.7%, P = 0.046)., Conclusions: These results suggest that both anti-TNFs and 6MP, but not vedolizumab, propagate EBV-driven lymphoblastoid transformation in an in vitro model of lymphoma. This model may prove useful for studying mechanisms underlying proneoplastic viral immune interactions of novel drugs in IBD therapy., (© 2020 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: After adalimumab treatment failure, tumour necrosis factor inhibition (TNFi) and non-TNFi biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are equally viable options on a group level as subsequent treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on the current best evidence synthesis. However, preliminary data suggest that anti-adalimumab antibodies (anti-drug antibodies, ADA) and adalimumab serum levels (ADL) during treatment predict response to a TNFi as subsequent treatment., Objective: To validate the association of presence of ADA and/or low ADL with response to a subsequent TNFi bDMARD or non-TNFi bDMARD. Sub-analyses were performed for primary and secondary non-responders., Methods: A diagnostic test accuracy retrospective cohort study was done in consenting RA patients who discontinued adalimumab after >3 months of treatment due to inefficacy and started another bDMARD. Inclusion criteria included the availability of (random timed) serum samples between ≥8 weeks after start and ≤2 weeks after discontinuation of adalimumab, and clinical outcome measurements Disease Activity Score in 28 joints - C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) between 3 to 6 months after treatment switch. Test characteristics for EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) good response (DAS28-CRP based) after treatment with the next (non-)TNFi bDMARD were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity/specificity., Results: 137 patients were included. ADA presence was not predictive for response in switchers to a TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 18%/75%) or a non-TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 33%/70%). The same was true for ADL levels in patients that switched to a TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 50%/52%) and patients that switched to a non-TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 32%/69%). Predictive value of ADA and ADL were similar for both primary and secondary non-responders to adalimumab., Conclusions: In contrast to earlier research, we could not find predictive value for response to a second TNFi or non-TNFi for either ADA or random timed ADL., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: TNF-α blocker therapy is part of the treatment with biologics used in the management of inflammatory joint diseases. In recent years, drug-induced neutralizing antibodies have been shown to have a negative effect on the course of the disease process., Aim: To investigate drug-induced neutralizing antibodies against TNF-α blocking drugs used in patients with inflammatory joint diseases and their effect on the clinical course of the disease., Materials and Methods: The study included 121 (56.8%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 50 (23.5%) patients with ankylosing spondylitis, 42 (19.7%) patients with psoriatic arthritis, and 31 sex and age-matched healthy controls. The patients were monitored at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation of TNF-α blocker treatment. The demographic data, vital signs and the parameters of inflammatory activity (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and disease activity indices) were analyzed in all patients. Drug-induced anti-TNF-α blockers antibodies (adalimumab and etanercept) were analyzed using ELISA. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 24., Results: Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies against adalimumab were obtained in 11.57% of patients at 6 month, in 17.64% at 12 month, and in 24.8% at 24 month. Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies to etanercept were not demonstrated in patients followed up at 6 months, at 7.77% at 12 months, and at 9.63% at 24 months. Between the presence of neutralizing antibodies to blockers of TNF-α and indices available for disease activity, there is a strong positive correlation and Pearson Correlation = 0.701, p=0.001. Patients with poor clinical response and available antibodies against adalimumab at 12 months were 82.36% and patients treated with etanercept 71.42%. The difference between the two groups was non-significant (U = 0.527, p> 0.05). Patients with poor clinical response and available anti-adalimumab antibodies at 24 month were 75%, and in patients treated with etanercept - 87.50%, the difference between the two groups not being able to reach significance (U = 0.623, p> 0.05)., Conclusion: Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies against TNF-α blockers (adalimumab and etanercept) have a negative effect on the course of inflammatory joint disease and can be used as reliable biomarker to assess the effect of the treatment with these drugs., (This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) have revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however despite considerable progress, only a small proportion of patients maintain long-term clinical response. Selection of, and switching between, biologics is mainly empirical, experiential, and not evidence-based. Most biopharmaceutical proteins (BP) can induce an immune response against the foreign protein component. Immunogenicity and the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is considered one of the main reasons for loss of therapeutic efficacy (secondary failure). ADAs may neutralize and/or promote clearance of circulating BP with resultant low serum drug levels, loss of clinical response, poor drug survival and adverse events, such as infusion reactions. ADA identification is technically difficult and not standardized, making interpretation of immunogenicity data from published clinical studies challenging. Trough TNFi drug levels correlate with clinical outcomes, exhibiting a "concentration-response" relationship. Measurement of ADA and drug levels may improve patient care and improve cost-effectiveness of BP use. However, in the absence of clinically-validated, reliable assays and consensus guidelines, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and immunogenicity testing have not been widely adopted in routine clinical practice in Rheumatology. Here we discuss the utility and relevance of TDM and immunogenicity testing of TNFis in RA (focusing on the most widely used TNFis globally, with the most available data, i.e., infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept), the limitations of currently available assays and potential future immunopharmacological strategies to personalize disease management., (Copyright © 2020 Mehta and Manson.)

Along years, the advent of biological therapy widely modified treatment of rheumatic diseases and other disorders. However, many agents may elicit in anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) upon consecutive infusions, with a loss of response. For the right strategy of a personalized medicine, the therapeutic monitoring of TNF-α inhibitors and ADAbs represents an important effort in diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, to improve overall patient management and favoring an appropriate clinical approach. A raising number of diagnostic tests have been designed to elucidate the efficacy and/or safety of a specific drug or class of drugs for a targeted patient's group. Our paper reviewed the current understanding of the immunogenicity of biological drugs employed in the treatment of inflammatory diseases underlying the laboratory role.

Background: The development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) inhibitors is a significant result contributing to the loss of clinical response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Aims: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the addition of immunomodulators to TNF-α inhibitors lead to reversal of antibody formation in TNF-α inhibitor-treated IBD patients., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases from inception through October 2018 in order to identify specific studies describing clinical response in IBD patients following the addition of immunomodulators (methotrexate or thiopurines) to TNF-α inhibitors. Clinical response was expressed as an improvement of symptoms, with a noted decrease or complete elimination of ADA against TNF-α inhibitors. The meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model., Results: Four studies were included in our final meta-analysis, which reported outcomes in 72 patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors. Forty-nine of the seventy-two (68%) patients received either methotrexate (19) or thiopurines (30). The average follow up period was 13.5 months. The overall pooled clinical response was 73.86% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.36-94.38, I 2  = 60.77%)., Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, addition of immunomodulators to TNF-α inhibitors was shown to restore the clinical response in 74% of the patients by either decreasing or completely eliminating anti-drug antibody levels. Further long-term multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Background and Objectives: Vedolizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]. Endoscopic outcome data are limited, especially in anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] naïve patients. The present study compared endoscopic outcome in anti-TNF naïve and exposed patients, and explored if this was affected by drug exposure., Methods: We retrospectively analysed all patients initiating vedolizumab at our tertiary referral centre since 2015. For UC, endoscopic improvement was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 at week 14. For CD, endoscopic remission was defined as absence of ulcerations at week 22. Vedolizumab trough concentrations were measured at week 6, week 14 and during maintenance., Results: A total of 336 patients were identified [53.3% CD], 20% of them being anti-TNF naïve. Endoscopic improvement was achieved by 56.1% of UC patients and endoscopic remission by 39.1% of CD patients. Endoscopic outcomes were significantly better in anti-TNF naïve vs exposed patients [all: 67.2% vs 42.0%, p = 0.0002; UC: 74.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.02; CD: 57.1% vs 35.8%, p = 0.03]. Achievement of endoscopic end points significantly impacted long-term treatment continuation [p = 9.7 × 10-13]. A better endoscopic outcome was associated with significantly higher drug exposure in both CD and UC., Conclusions: The results of this observational, single-centre real-life study suggest that vedolizumab may induce endoscopic remission in both CD and UC. Although anti-TNF naïve patients had a significantly better outcome, 42% of anti-TNF exposed patients still benefited endoscopically. A clear exposure-endoscopic response relationship exists, but not all patients will benefit from treatment intensification. Hence, predictive biomarkers remain necessary., Podcast: This article has an associated podcast which can be accessed at https://academic.oup.com/ecco-jcc/pages/podcast., (Copyright © 2019 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have significantly improved treatment outcome of rheumatic diseases since their incorporation into treatment protocols two decades ago. Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of patients experiences either primary or secondary failure to TNFi due to ineffectiveness of the drug or adverse reactions. Secondary failure and adverse events can be related to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The earliest studies that reported ADA toward TNFi mainly used drug-sensitive assays. Retrospectively, we recognize this has led to an underestimation of the amount of ADA produced due to drug interference. Drug-tolerant ADA assays also detect ADA in the presence of drug, which has contributed to the currently reported higher incidence of ADA development. Comprehension and awareness of the assay format used for ADA detection is thus essential to interpret ADA measurements correctly. In addition, a concurrent drug level measurement is informative as it may provide insight in the extent of underestimation of ADA levels and improves understanding the clinical consequences of ADA formation. The clinical effects are dependent on the ratio between the amount of drug that is neutralized by ADA and the amount of unbound drug. Pharmacokinetic modeling might be useful in this context. The ADA response generally gives rise to high affinity IgG antibodies, but this response will differ between patients. Some patients will not reach the phase of affinity maturation while others generate an enduring high titer high affinity IgG response. This response can be transient in some patients, indicating a mechanism of tolerance induction or B-cell anergy. In this review several different aspects of the ADA response toward TNFi will be discussed. It will highlight the ADA assays, characteristics and regulation of the ADA response, impact of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics of TNFi, clinical implications of ADA formation, and possible mitigation strategies., (Copyright © 2020 Atiqi, Hooijberg, Loeff, Rispens and Wolbink.)

Objective: To assess the longitudinal production of anti-adalimumab antibody (AAA) and baseline risk factors for this antibody development in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients initiating adalimumab (ADA)., Method: Thirty consecutive JIA patients under ADA therapy were prospectively followed. JIA clinical/laboratorial/treatment data and sera for ADA and AAA assays (ELISA and bridging ELISA) were obtained at baseline (BL), 2 months (2M), 3 months (3M), 6 months (6M), 12 months (12M), and 24 months (24M). Patients with therapy failure requiring ADA withdrawn had their sera evaluated at their last medical visit prior to biologic switch (blinded to ADA and AAA levels)., Results: AAA was absent at BL, first detected at 2M after ADA initiation in 2/30 (7%) patients with a significant increase at 3M (10/29 (34%), p = 0.013) and no major change in 6M (11/30 (37%)) and 12M (9/26 (35%)). Of note, at 3M, AAA levels correlated negatively with ADA levels (r = - 0.781, p = 0.0001). Analysis of BL predictors revealed a significantly higher risk of developing AAA in patients with female gender (OR 21; 95% CI 1.08-406.57; p = 0.044), ESR > 30 mm/1st hour (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.04-28.53; p = 0.045), and leflunomide use (OR 9.33; 95% CI 1.51-57.66; p = 0.016). In contrast, concomitant use of methotrexate was protective for AAA appearance (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.53; p = 0.009). After 12M of ADA, 60% of AAA-positive patients required drug switch for drug failure compared with 15% in AAA-negative group (p = 0.03)., Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence of AAA production kinetics demonstrating a timely significant increase starting at 3M and stable throughout 24M. We also identified female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use as relevant risk factors for AAA production at BL, whereas methotrexate was protective. Early systematic monitoring of AAA at 3M may, therefore, guide drug switching in these patients.Key Points• Anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) production kinetics demonstrated a timely significant increase starting at 3M in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients under adalimumab therapy• Female gender, increased ESR, and leflunomide use were identified as relevant risk factors for AAA production in JIA, whereas methotrexate was protective.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-17A are pleiotropic cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). JNJ-61178104 is a novel human anti-TNF and anti-IL-17A monovalent, bispecific antibody that binds to both human TNF and human IL-17A with high affinities and blocks the binding of TNF and IL-17A to their receptors in vitro . JNJ-61178104 also potently neutralizes TNF and IL-17A-mediated downstream effects in multiple cell-based assays. In vivo , treatment with JNJ-61178104 resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of cellular influx in a human IL-17A/TNF-induced murine lung neutrophilia model and the inhibitory effects of JNJ-61178104 were more potent than the treatment with bivalent parental anti-TNF or anti-IL-17A antibodies. JNJ-61178104 was shown to engage its targets, TNF and IL-17A, in systemic circulation measured as drug/target complex formation in normal cynomolgus monkeys (cyno). Surprisingly, quantitative target engagement assessment suggested lower apparent in vivo target-binding affinities for JNJ-61178104 compared to its bivalent parental antibodies, despite their similar in vitro target-binding affinities. The target engagement profiles of JNJ-61178104 in humans were in general agreement with the predicted profiles based on cyno data, suggesting similar differences in the apparent in vivo target-binding affinities. These findings show that in vivo target engagement of monovalent bispecific antibody does not necessarily recapitulate that of the molar-equivalent dose of its bivalent parental antibody. Our results also offer valuable insights into the understanding of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and target engagement of other bispecific biologics against dimeric and/or trimeric soluble targets in vivo .

Background and Aims: Patients with rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of atherosclerosis with up-regulated serum amyloid A (SAA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), which were reported to activate human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC). We aimed to investigate the effects of TNF-α inhibitor infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies on the TNF-α/IL-1β/SAA activated HCAEC., Methods: HCAEC were incubated with TNF-α, IL-1β, SAA, infliximab, anti-infliximab antibodies and their combinations. The protein levels of pro- and anti-atherogenic analytes were measured in supernatants using ELISA and multiplex assays, while mRNA expression was determined by RT-PCR. Anti-infliximab antibodies were purified from sera samples by affinity chromatography., Results: IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α were synergistically up-regulated in triple stimulation with TNF-α, IL-1β and SAA, while their levels in solely SAA- or TNF-α-stimulated HCAEC did not increase. IL-1Ra, IL-1α, VCAM-1, MCP-1, IL-10 and IL-17A were increased, but no synergistic responses were observed in triple stimulation. Infliximab was effective in lowering the synergistic effect of IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α in triple stimulation, while anti-infliximab antibodies restored the levels. The changes were confirmed at the mRNA expression level for IL-6, IL-8 and GM-CSF., Conclusions: Triple stimulation with TNF-α, IL-1β and SAA synergistically elevated IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF and GRO-α release in supernatants of HCAEC, with infliximab substantially inhibiting their levels. An isolated, enriched fraction of polyclonal anti-infliximab antibodies was capable of neutralizing infliximab, in the presence of TNF-α/IL-1β/SAA. The long-term presence of anti-infliximab antibodies in the circulation of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases is potentially important for promoting the atherosclerotic process., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Some patients develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which reduce the efficacy of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases. ADAs arise inconsistently, and it is not clear what factors determine their formation. We investigated features of the immune system, the infliximab antibody, and its complex with TNF that might contribute to ADA generation., Methods: C57BL/6 mice were given injections of infliximab and recombinant human TNF or infliximab F(ab') 2 fragments. Blood samples were collected every 2-3 days for 2 weeks and weekly thereafter for up to 6 weeks; infliximab-TNF complexes and ADAs were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Intestinal biopsy and blood samples were obtained from patients having endoscopy who had received infliximab therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases; infliximab-TNF complexes were measured with ELISA. Infliximab-specific plasma cells were detected in patient tissue samples by using mass cytometry. We studied activation of innate immune cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors incubated with infliximab or infliximab-TNF complexes; toll-like receptors (TLRs) were blocked with antibodies, endocytosis was blocked with the inhibitor PitStop2, and cytokine expression was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ELISAs. Uptake of infliximab and infliximab-TNF complexes by THP-1 cells was measured with confocal microscopy., Results: Mice given increasing doses of infliximab produced increasing levels of ADAs. Blood samples from mice given injections of human TNF and infliximab contained infliximab-TNF complexes; complex formation was associated with ADA formation with an area under the curve of 0.944 (95% confidence interval, 0.851-1.000; P = .003). Intestinal tissues from patients, but not blood samples, contained infliximab-TNF complexes and infliximab-specific plasma cells. Incubation of PBMCs with infliximab-TNF complexes resulted in a 4.74-fold increase in level of interleukin (IL) 1β (IL1B) messenger RNA (P for comparison = .005), increased IL1B protein secretion, and a 2.69-fold increase in the expression of TNF messenger RNA (P for comparison = 0.013) compared with control PBMCs. Infliximab reduced only IL1B and TNF expression. Antibodies against TLR2 or TLR4 did not block the increases in IL1B or TNF expression, but endocytosis was required. THP-1 cells endocytosed higher levels of infliximab-TNF complexes than infliximab alone., Conclusions: In mice, we found ADA formation to increase with dose of infliximab given and concentration of infliximab-TNF complexes detected in blood. Based on studies of human intestinal tissues and blood samples, we propose that infliximab-TNF complexes formed in the intestine are endocytosed by and activate innate immune cells, which increase expression of IL1B and TNF and production of antibodies against the drug complex. It is therefore important to optimize the infliximab dose to a level that is effective but does not activate an innate immune response against the drug-TNF complex., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely available for biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We reviewed current data and provided expert opinion regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologic therapies in IBD., Methods: We used a modified Delphi method to establish consensus. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding the use of TDM of biologic therapy in IBD and presented to international IBD specialists. Subsequently, 28 statements on the application of TDM in clinical practice were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree) by each of the panellists. Statements were accepted if 80% or more of the participants agreed with a score ≥7. The remaining statements were discussed and revised based on the available evidence followed by a second round of voting., Results: The panel agreed on 24 (86%) statements. For anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, proactive TDM was found to be appropriate after induction and at least once during maintenance therapy, but this was not the case for the other biologics. Reactive TDM was appropriate for all agents both for primary non-response and secondary loss of response. The panellists also agreed on several statements regarding TDM and appropriate drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentration thresholds for biologics in specific clinical scenarios., Conclusion: Consensus was achieved towards the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, particularly anti-TNF therapies. More data are needed especially on non-anti-TNF biologics to further define optimal drug concentration and ADA thresholds as these can vary depending on the therapeutic outcomes assessed., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Our aim was to assess the relationship between serum adalimumab levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and disease activity in patients with axial spondylarthritis (SpA). We have carried out a single-centre cross-sectional study. adalimumab and ADA levels were analysed with ELISA and correlated with SpA activity using BASDAI and ASDAS scores. Adalimumab cut-off value was calculated to discriminate inactive disease/low disease activity (BASDAI < 4; ASDAS < 2.1) from moderate/high disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4; ASDAS ≥ 2.1), using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Up to January 2016, 51 consecutive patients were included. The median (range) age was 46.6 (18-68) and 47.1% were women. ADA prevalence was 27.5%, with none detected in the 21.6% receiving concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (p = 0.021). Adalimumab level was normal (> 3 mg/l) in 36 patients (70.6%), all without ADA. Fifteen patients (29.4%) had subtherapeutic adalimumab levels (< 3 mg/l), with ADA in 14 (93%). Median adalimumab (mg/l) was significantly higher in patients with inactive disease/low disease activity: BASDAI < 4 vs ≥ 4: 9.5 vs 2.6 (p < 0.01); ASDAS-CRP < 2.1 vs ≥ 2.1: 9.3 vs 0.3 (p < 0.001); ASDAS-ESR < 2.1 vs ≥ 2.1: 9.9 vs 3.0 (p < 0.001), and this finding was consistent with the result of the multivariate model. Patients with inactive disease/low disease activity presented significantly lower ADA levels. The adalimumab level cut-offs and area under the curve (AUC) obtained in the ROC curves were: ASDAS-CRP (< 2.1) 4.6 mg/l (AUC 81.2%; 95% CI 67.5-94.9; p < 0.001); ASDAS-ESR (< 2.1) 7.7 mg/l (AUC 82.4%; 95% CI 69.3-95.5; p < 0.001); BASDAI (< 4) 6.4 mg/l (AUC 73.5%; 95% CI 58.6-88.3; p < 0.01). In conclusion, presence of ADA in axial SpA patients treated with adalimumab was associated with lower serum drug levels. ADA levels were lower and adalimumab levels were higher in patients with inactive disease/low disease activity based on BASDAI and ASDAS indices. Concomitant treatment with MTX reduces de likelihood of finding ADA. Serum adalimumab levels above 4.6 mg/l are recommended to avoid compromising efficacy.

Background: Anti-TNF drugs are effective treatments for the management of Crohn's disease but treatment failure is common. We aimed to identify clinical and pharmacokinetic factors that predict primary non-response at week 14 after starting treatment, non-remission at week 54, and adverse events leading to drug withdrawal., Methods: The personalised anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease study (PANTS) is a prospective observational UK-wide study. We enrolled anti-TNF-naive patients (aged ≥6 years) with active luminal Crohn's disease at the time of first exposure to infliximab or adalimumab between March 7, 2013, and July 15, 2016. Patients were evaluated for 12 months or until drug withdrawal. Demographic data, smoking status, age at diagnosis, disease duration, location, and behaviour, previous medical and drug history, and previous Crohn's disease-related surgeries were recorded at baseline. At every visit, disease activity score, weight, therapy, and adverse events were recorded; drug and total anti-drug antibody concentrations were also measured. Treatment failure endpoints were primary non-response at week 14, non-remission at week 54, and adverse events leading to drug withdrawal. We used regression analyses to identify which factors were associated with treatment failure., Findings: We enrolled 955 patients treated with infliximab (753 with originator; 202 with biosimilar) and 655 treated with adalimumab. Primary non-response occurred in 295 (23·8%, 95% CI 21·4-26·2) of 1241 patients who were assessable at week 14. Non-remission at week 54 occurred in 764 (63·1%, 60·3-65·8) of 1211 patients who were assessable, and adverse events curtailed treatment in 126 (7·8%, 6·6-9·2) of 1610 patients. In multivariable analysis, the only factor independently associated with primary non-response was low drug concentration at week 14 (infliximab: odds ratio 0·35 [95% CI 0·20-0·62], p=0·00038; adalimumab: 0·13 [0·06-0·28], p<0·0001); the optimal week 14 drug concentrations associated with remission at both week 14 and week 54 were 7 mg/L for infliximab and 12 mg/L for adalimumab. Continuing standard dosing regimens after primary non-response was rarely helpful; only 14 (12·4% [95% CI 6·9-19·9]) of 113 patients entered remission by week 54. Similarly, week 14 drug concentration was also independently associated with non-remission at week 54 (0·29 [0·16-0·52] for infliximab; 0·03 [0·01-0·12] for adalimumab; p<0·0001 for both). The proportion of patients who developed anti-drug antibodies (immunogenicity) was 62·8% (95% CI 59·0-66·3) for infliximab and 28·5% (24·0-32·7) for adalimumab. For both drugs, suboptimal week 14 drug concentrations predicted immunogenicity, and the development of anti-drug antibodies predicted subsequent low drug concentrations. Combination immunomodulator (thiopurine or methotrexate) therapy mitigated the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·32-0·46] for infliximab; 0·44 [0·31-0·64] for adalimumab; p<0·0001 for both). For infliximab, multivariable analysis of immunododulator use, and week 14 drug and anti-drug antibody concentrations showed an independent effect of immunomodulator use on week 54 non-remission (odds ratio 0·56 [95% CI 0·38-0·83], p=0·004)., Interpretation: Anti-TNF treatment failure is common and is predicted by low drug concentrations, mediated in part by immunogenicity. Clinical trials are required to investigate whether personalised induction regimens and treatment-to-target dose intensification improve outcomes., Funding: Guts UK, Crohn's and Colitis UK, Cure Crohn's Colitis, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Celltrion., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory diseases. Several drugs blocking TNF-α are employed in clinical practice in pediatrics. Given their action on the immune system, TNF-α inhibitors have raised concerns on their safety profile since their introduction. A broad spectrum of side effects related to TNF inhibition has been reported: immunogenicity, infectious diseases, malignancies, and others. Areas covered : In order to assess the risk related to the use of anti-TNF-α agents in children with rheumatic diseases we analyzed data obtained from retrospective and prospective safety studies, case reports and case series, and controlled trials. Expert commentary : Anti-TNF-α agents have shown a remarkably good safety profile in the pediatric population so far. However, there are lots of questions to be answered and maintaining active surveillance on these drugs is necessary in order to not overlook any possible unexpected adverse effects.

Background: Many patients may have resistance to TNF-blockers. These drugs may induce neutralizing antibodies. The determination of the drug levels of TNF-blockers and Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) against TNF-blockers may help to make clinical decisions., Objectives: The objective of this study was to associate and predict the drug levels of TNFblockers and ADAs in relation to disease activity in patients with Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)., Methods: Cross-sectional study including patients fulfilling ASAS classification criteria for SpA and 2010 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for RA. These patients were treated with Adalimumab (ADA), Infliximab (IFX), and Etanercept (ETN). A bivariate analysis and the chi-square test were performed to evaluate the association of ADAs and drug levels with activity measures for SpA and RA. Five regression models analyzing drug levels, ADAs and disease activity measures using a multiple linear regression were performed in order to evaluate the prediction of ADAs and drug levels in relation to disease activity., Results: In SpA, IFX levels were associated with BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) (p=0.034). In RA, total drug levels were associated with DAS28-ESR (28 joint Disease activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate), (p=0.008), DAS28-CRP (p=0.042), CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) (p=0.047) and SDAI (Simple Disease activity index), (p=0.017). ADA levels had association with CDAI (p=0.002) and SDAI (p=0.002). IFX levels were associated with a DAS28-ESR (p=0.044), DAS28-CRP (p=0.022) and SDAI (p=0.022). ADAs were associated in SpA with BASDAI (p=0.027). Drug levels and ADAs did not predict disease activity in patients with SpA or RA., Conclusion: ADAs and drug levels of anti-TNF are associated with disease activity measures in patients with SpA and RA. However, they cannot predict clinical activity in these conditions., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the clinical outcomes and pharmacokinetics of a second anti-TNF according to the pharmacokinetics of the first anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methods: In patients in loss of response (LOR) to a first optimized anti-TNF and switched to a second anti-TNF, pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF were measured at the switch time, 30 weeks later, at the time of LOR, or at the end of the study (102 weeks)., Results: At the switch time, patients (n = 59) belonged to 4 groups according to the pharmacokinetics of the first anti-TNF: group 1 (n = 18), therapeutic trough levels; group 2 (n = 13) undetectable trough levels with antibodies against anti-TNF; group 3 (n = 13) without antibodies against anti-TNF; and group 4 (n = 15) subtherapeutic trough levels. After switching, the failure rates at week 30 and during the follow-up were as follows, respectively: in group 1 with therapeutic levels, 50% and 78%, despite therapeutic levels of the second anti-TNF in 83% of cases; in group 2 with undetectable levels and antibodies, 15% and 69% with undetectable levels of the second anti-TNF and antibodies in 85% of cases; in group 3 with undetectable levels without antibodies, 0% and 31% with therapeutic levels in 77% of cases; in group 4 with subtherapeutic levels, 13% and 33% with therapeutic levels in 73% of cases. Clinical remission rates were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in groups 1 and 2 with therapeutic or undetectable levels with antibodies than in the 2 other groups., Conclusion: In the case of LOR with therapeutic levels of the first anti-TNF or undetectable levels with antibodies, the switch to a second anti-TNF results in pharmacokinetic profile similar to the first one and again in LOR in most of the patients., (© 2018 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)