Search

Most existing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcome studies omit emergency department (ED) use. To our knowledge, this study on ED use following ACDF surgery is the first to use a direct patient chart review and the first to include revision patients, 1–5 levels of ACDFs, and performance of corpectomy in the analysis. This study examines the frequency and basis of hospital service use within 30 days of ACDF surgery, specifically ED visits, hospital readmissions, and returns to the operating room. A retrospective chart review was performed for 1273 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF surgery at one institution from July 2013 to June 2016. Of the 1273 patients with ACDF, 97 (7.6%) presented to the ED within 30 days after surgery. Of 43 patients with revision ACDF, 9 (20.9%) returned to the ED, compared with 88 (7.2%) of 1230 patients with primary ACDF (P = 0.001). Of the 111 ED visits by 97 patients, 40 (36%) were for cervicalgia, 13 (12%) were for dysphagia, 8 (7%) were for trauma, 7 (6%) were for nausea, 4 (4%) were for medication refill, 3 (3%) were for dehiscence, 3 (3%) were for pneumonia, and 3 (3%) were for urinary tract infection. Of the ED presentations, 8 (7%) occurred during the first 2 days after surgery, and 46 (41%) occurred within the first postoperative week.

OBJECTIVE Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common and robust procedure performed on the cervical spine. Literature on ACDF for 4 or more segments is sparse. Increasing the number of operative levels increases surgical complexity, tissue retraction, and risks of complications, particularly dysphagia. The overall risks of these complications and rates of dysphagia are not well studied for surgery on 4 or more segments. In this study, the authors evaluated their institution’s perioperative experience with 4- and 5-level ACDFs. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent 4- or 5-level ACDF at their institution over a 6-year period (May 2013–May 2019). Patient demographics, perioperative complications, readmission rates, and swallowing outcomes were recorded. Outcomes were analyzed with a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS A total of 174 patients were included (167 had 4-level and 7 had 5-level ACDFs). The average age was 60.6 years, and 54.0% of patients (n = 94) were men. A corpectomy was performed in 12.6% of patients (n = 22). After surgery, 56.9% of patients (n = 99) experienced dysphagia. The percentage of patients with dysphagia decreased to 22.8% (37/162) at 30 days, 12.9% (17/132) at 90 days, and 6.3% (5/79) and 2.8% (1/36) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Dysphagia was more likely at 90 days postoperatively in patients with gastroesophageal reflux (OR 4.4 [95% CI 1.5–12.8], p = 0.008), and the mean (± SD) lordosis change was greater in patients with dysphagia than those without at 90 days (19.8° ± 13.3° vs 9.1° ± 10.2°, p = 0.003). Dysphagia occurrence did not differ with operative implants, including graft and interbody type. The mean length of time to solid food intake was 2.4 ± 2.1 days. Patients treated with dexamethasone were more likely to achieve solid food intake prior to discharge (OR 4.0 [95% CI 1.5–10.6], p = 0.004). Postsurgery, 5.2% of patients (n = 9) required a feeding tube due to severe approach-related dysphagia. Other perioperative complication rates were uniformly low. Overall, 8.6% of patients (n = 15) returned to the emergency department within 30 days and 2.9% (n = 5) required readmission, whereas 1.1% (n = 2) required unplanned return to surgery within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of patients undergoing 4- and 5-level ACDFs reported to date. This procedure was performed safely with minimal intraoperative complications. More than half of the patients experienced in-hospital dysphagia, which increased their overall length of stay, but dysphagia decreased over time.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion are common techniques that typically require staged procedures when performed in combination. Interest is emerging in single-position surgery to increase operative efficiency. We report a novel surgical technique, supine extended reach lateral fusion, to perform ALIF and lateral lumbar interbody fusion with the patient in a single supine position.A man in his fifties presented with degenerative levoscoliosis, spondylolisthesis, sagittal plane deformity, and progressive low back pain. He was offered L3-S1 anterolateral fusion.With the patient supine, a left abdominal paramedian incision was performed to gain anterior retroperitoneal access, and standard L5-S1 and L4-5 ALIFs were performed. The anterior incision was used for direct visualization, retraction, and bimanual dissection. A left lateral incision was then made to perform an L3-4 lateral lumbar interbody fusion. He subsequently underwent a second-stage L3-S1 posterior percutaneous fixation. The patient tolerated the procedures well, without complications. His postoperative radiograph findings confirmed acceptable implant positioning. He was discharged home in stable condition and was doing well at follow-up.This case description is the first report of the supine extended reach technique, which allows incorporation of anterior and lateral fusion constructs at adjacent levels without changing patient positioning. Many surgeons believe the ALIF to be the most powerful technique for achieving lordosis, and this technique enables concomitant lateral access in a supine position. It can also be used as an alternative strategy when anterior access to the disc space is unobtainable. Further clinical investigation of this technique is warranted.

Retrospective analysis of operative data from cadaveric cervical spines.To evaluate the accuracy of neuronavigation compared with laminotomy with direct visualization (DV) of the pedicle for placement of subaxial pedicle screws.Subaxial pedicle screws provide superior fixation compared with other posterior cervical fixation strategies. However, high accuracy is required for safe placement, given the proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Computed tomography (CT)-based neuronavigation has increased in popularity for placement of spinal implants, including subaxial pedicle screws. However, the accuracy of the technique for this application has not been extensively evaluated.Six fresh-frozen cadaveric spines (occiput to T2) were prepared. Pedicle screws were placed from C3 to C7 on either side using either the DV or neuronavigation technique (alternating sides between specimens). Pedicles with diameters4 mm were excluded. For the DV technique, a hemilaminotomy was performed for DV of pedicle borders and to determine appropriate screw medialization and trajectory. Neuronavigation screws were placed using CT-based navigation with a reference frame mounted on the C2 spinous process. Screw position was evaluated using postoperative CT, and breaches were classified using the Neo classification.Fifty pedicle screws were placed at 25 levels in 6 cadaveric spines; 25 screws each were placed using neuronavigation or DV. No significant difference in accuracy was found between the 2 techniques. Three (12%) breaches occurred in the DV group, and 9 (36%) breaches occurred in the neuronavigation group (P=0.10). The breaches were evenly distributed across all levels. There were no high-grade breaches with DV and only 1 (4.0%) with neuronavigation (P0.99). Average pedicle cortical and medullary bone widths were higher for levels with no breach (P=0.009 and P=0.02, respectively).High accuracy can be achieved with both neuronavigation and DV for placement of subaxial cervical pedicle screws in cadavers.

BACKGROUND Few have explored the safety and efficacy of posterior vertebral column subtraction osteotomy (PVCSO) to treat tethered cord syndrome (TCS). OBJECTIVE To evaluate surgical outcomes after PVCSO in adults with TCS caused by lipomyelomeningocele, who had undergone a previous detethering procedure(s) that ultimately failed. METHODS This is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort. Patients were prospectively enrolled and treated with PVCSO at 2 institutions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 yr, TCS caused by lipomyelomeningocele, previous detethering surgery, and recurrent symptom progression of less than 2-yr duration. All patients undergoing surgery with a 1-yr minimum follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 20 patients (mean age: 36 yr; sex: 15F/5M) met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. At follow-up (mean: 23.3 ± 7.4 mo), symptomatic improvement/resolution was seen in 93% of patients with leg pain, 84% in back pain, 80% in sensory abnormalities, 80% in motor deficits, 55% in bowel incontinence, and 50% in urinary incontinence. Oswestry Disability Index improved from a preoperative mean of 57.7 to 36.6 at last follow-up (P

Objective We sought to evaluate dynamic balance and postural stability in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with published age-matched normative data. Methods Eleven patients with ASD were prospectively enrolled. Postural stability was tested using static and dynamic posturography; patients stood on a movable platform with an integrated force plate and performed standardized sensory organization testing (SOT), evaluating the influence of sensory processing on postural stability under 6 conditions, and motor control testing, assessing reflexive postural reactions to an external perturbation. Patient performance was compared with that of published age-matched controls. Quality of life metrics included scores on the Scoliosis Research Society−22 questionnaire, SF-36, and Morse Fall Scale. Correlations between postural stability and radiographic measurements were performed. Results ASD patients demonstrated significantly lower SOT scores (P ≤ 0.03) in 5 of 6 conditions tested and greater latency of limb movement during backward translation (P = 0.04) compared with controls. Lower SOT scores were associated with a history of falls. ASD patients who self-reported falling in the previous 6 months, when compared with nonfallers, demonstrated significantly lower SOT scores (P = 0.04) and significantly lower Scoliosis Research Society−22 self-image subscores (P = 0.003). Thoracic kyphosis and mediolateral sway (predictor of falls) were positively correlated in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions (P ≤ 0.04). Conclusions ASD patients demonstrated impaired postural stability, diminished sensory integration, and delayed response to external perturbations compared with normal control data. Postural stability and quality of life metrics correlated with self-reported falls. These findings suggest that ASD patients have abnormal postural stability and may be at elevated risk of falls.

Atlantoaxial pseudoarthrosis is a challenging postoperative complication. The use of a local, vascularized bone graft, without free tissue transfer, to support a revision atlantoaxial fusion has not been previously described. We report the first surgical patient who received a semispinalis capitis muscle pedicled, occipital bone graft for supplementation of a revision atlantoaxial arthrodesis. A 72-year-old female had a failed atlantoaxial fusion and developed neck pain from continued instability and fractured hardware. The fixation and fusion were revised and supplemented with a novel, pedicled occipital bone graft. A craniectomy was performed in the occipital bone while still attached to the semispinalis capitis muscle to provide graft vascularity. This graft was rotated inferiorly from the skull base to the C1 arch and C2 spinous process in order to supplement a revision atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The patient had excellent clinical recovery over 18-month clinical follow up. The bone graft harvesting and rotation were performed safely and without complication. The 6-month postoperative CT scan showed partial fusion into the graft. This novel surgical technique leverages the advantages of vascularized structural autograft without adding extensive time or morbidity to the procedure as observed in free-tissue transfers. It is a safe and useful salvage technique to supplement revision atlantoaxial fusion surgeries.

Insight into the historic contributions made to modern-day spine surgery provides context for understanding the monumental accomplishments comprising current techniques, technology, and clinical success. Only during the last century did surgical growth occur in the treatment of spinal disorders. With that growth came a renaissance of innovation, particularly with the evolution of spinal instrumentation and fixation techniques. In this article, the authors capture some of the key milestones that have led to the field of spine surgery today, with an emphasis on the historical advances related to instrumentation, navigation, minimally invasive surgery, robotics, and neurosurgical training.

Study Design: Evaluation of new technology. Objectives: To evaluate the utility of a novel biomimetic spine model as a surgical planning and education resource in the treatment of cervical spine deformities (CSD). Methods: Three patients with CSD were identified and synthetic spine models were manufactured to match the anatomical and biomechanical properties of each patient. Each model underwent 3 phases of surgical correction: maximum correction with no osteotomies performed, with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) only, and with PCOs and a 3-column osteotomy (3CO). Lateral fluoroscopic films were obtained after each phase of correction for measurement of cervical lordosis. Surgeons were surveyed to obtain subjective feedback on the perceived model utility. Results: Each model began with a kyphotic deformity that was mobile, rigid, or fixed. The mobile model achieved successive lordotic correction with each phase of correction. The rigid and fixed models achieved much less correction with no osteotomies and PCOs only, and the majority of correction with 3COs. Each model predicted with varying, but overall high, accuracy the amount of correction achieved in each patient. The surgeons felt the model had very high utility as a surgical education platform. Conclusions: The models appeared to accurately replicate the gross anatomy and biomechanical performance of the patients’ spines. This high fidelity to the individual patient’s anatomy, bone quality, and segmental mobility resulted in a custom model that provides an invaluable learning platform for surgical education. These results suggest the models may have utility in surgical planning, but further studies are needed.

Study Design: Biomechanical model study. Objective: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. Methods: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. Results: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). Conclusions: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability.

Study Design: Description and evaluation of a novel surgical training platform. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the face, content, and construct validity of 5 novel surgical training models that simulate freehand and percutaneous (minimally invasive surgery [MIS]) pedicle screw placement. Methods: Five spine models were developed by residents: 3 for freehand pedicle screw training (models A-C) and 2 for MIS pedicle screw training (models D and E). Attending spine surgeons evaluated each model and, using a 20-point Likert-type scale, answered survey questions on model face, content, and construct validity. Scores were statistically evaluated and compared using means, standard deviations, and analysis of variance between models and between surgeons. Results: Among the freehand models, model C demonstrated the highest overall validity, with mean face (15.67 ± 5.49), content (19.17 ± 0.59), and construct (18.83 ± 0.24) validity all measuring higher than the other freehand models. For the MIS models, model D had the highest validity scores (face, content, and construct validity of 11.67 ± 3.77, 18.17 ± 2.04, and 17.00 ± 3.46, respectively). The 3 freehand models differed significantly in content validity scores ( P = .002) as did the 2 MIS models ( P < .001). The testing surgeons’ overall validity scores were significantly different for models A ( P = .005) and E ( P < .001). Conclusions: A 3-dimensional-printed spine model with incorporated bone bleeding and silicone rubber soft tissue was scored as having very high content and construct validity for simulating freehand pedicle screw insertion. These data has informed the further development of several surgical training models that hold great potential as educational adjuncts in surgical training programs.

Background Context C2 pedicle and pars screws require accurate placement to avoid injury to nearby neurovascular structures. Freehand, fluoroscopically guided, and computed tomography (CT)–based navigation techniques have been described in the medical literature. Purpose The present study aims to compare the safety and accuracy of the freehand technique versus stereotactic navigation for the placement of C2 pedicle and pars screws. Study Design/Setting This study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with posterior fixation constructs. Patient Sample A total of 220 consecutive patients were treated with posterior fixation constructs containing C2 pars or pedicle screws placed at our institution. Outcome Measures Computed tomography imaging was used to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Intraoperative complications and incidence of stroke or mortality within 30 days of the operation were analyzed. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients treated with posterior fixation constructs containing C2 pars or pedicle screws placed by spine surgeons between January 1, 2010, and August 31, 2016. Clinical and radiographic data were collected and analyzed. Screw accuracy was graded independently by two reviewers according to the following criteria: grade A (no breach), grades B–E (breach with transverse foramen obstruction of 1%–25%, 26%–50%, 51%–75%, or 76%–100%, respectively), and grade M (medial breach). Screws were divided into acceptable (grades A and B) and unacceptable (grades C–E and M). Results A total of 426 C2 pars or pedicle screws (312 freehand, 114 navigated) were placed in 220 patients (160 freehand, 60 navigated). Complications were similar between the groups: three vertebral artery injuries (two [1%] freehand, one [2%] navigated; p>.99), five deaths (four [3%] freehand, one [2%] navigated; p>.99), and one (2%) stroke in the navigated group (p=.61). Computed tomography imaging was available for accuracy grading of 182 screws (131 freehand, 51 navigated). No breaches (grade A) occurred in 113 of the freehand screws (86%) and in 34 of the navigated screws (67%) (p=.006). More screws had acceptable placement in the freehand group (123 of 131, 94%) than in the navigated group (42 of 51, 82%) (p=.02). Conclusions In patients with postoperative CT imaging (43%), the freehand technique was found to be more accurate than CT-based navigation for C2 pedicle or pars screw placement. Complication rates did not differ between the two techniques in this study.

Background Idiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) is a rare pathology of the spine defined by herniation of the spinal cord through a dural defect. Objective To highlight the operative management of ISCH and the surgical nuances of ISCH repairs conducted at our institution. Methods This retrospective review examines consecutive patients with ISCH who were treated surgically between January 1, 2010, and July 31, 2017, at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona. Results Four patients with ISCH presented with thoracic myelopathy and lower extremity weakness during the study period. Treatment consisted of reduction of the herniated spinal cord and filling of the dural defect with a collagen-based dural regeneration matrix. In 3 patients the dural edges were covered with a collagen-matrix intradural sling, and in 1 patient they were repaired primarily with interrupted sutures. Three of the 4 patients experienced improvement in myelopathic symptoms; the fourth patient suffered neurological decline in the immediate postoperative period. Conclusion ISCH is a complex pathological condition likely to result in progressive myelopathy. Surgery offers patients the possibility of stabilizing the progression of the spinal cord dysfunction and perhaps restoring neurological function. However, extreme care must be taken during surgery to minimize manipulation of the fragile herniated cord.

Background A major drawback to use of cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws (CBTPSs) with traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion grafts is that traditional graft insertion trajectories require wider posterior exposure. This wider exposure, beyond the limits otherwise required for CBTPS placement, negates a primary benefit of CBTPS fixation. The aim of this study was to define an alternative surgical technique for interbody graft placement that, when used in conjunction with CBTPS fixation, permits both minimal soft tissue dissection and optimal graft placement. Methods A team of neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of spinal pathologies developed a surgical technique for insertion of bilateral PLIF grafts that complements the principles of CBTPS fixation. This technique is illustrated in a patient undergoing lumbosacral decompression, CBTPS fixation, and 3-column arthrodesis. Results The described technique uses a divergent trajectory of bilateral PLIF grafts rather than the traditional parallel or convergent trajectories. Conclusions By aiming medially to laterally with the interbody graft, one recapitulates many advantages of CBTPSs, including avoidance of wide tissue dissection, greater intergraft volume available for bone grafting, and greater graft coverage of the hypophyseal ring. The prospective collection of outcome data for patients who undergo lumbosacral fusion using the divergent PLIF technique is ongoing.

Cadaveric feasibility study. To assess the anatomic and technical feasibility of rotating a clavicular segment on a sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) pedicle into the ventral cervical spine using a cadaveric model and to provide the first clinical case description of performing this procedure. Reconstruction of the anterior cervical spine in patients with a high risk of pseudoarthrosis may require the use of a vascularized bone graft (VBG). A vascularized clavicular graft rotated on an SCM pedicle would afford all the benefits of a VBG without the added morbidity of free-tissue transfer; however, this technique has not been described. A multidisciplinary team hypothesized that it would be anatomically and technically feasible to rotate a pedicled clavicular bone graft from the bottom of C2 to the top of T2 via an anterior approach. Five cadavers underwent bilateral anterior neck dissections for a total of 10 clavicular graft assessments. A case report describes the use of a clavicular VBG in a patient with a 3-level corpectomy defect and a history of failed fusion. Ten clavicles were rotated on an SCM pedicle. The grafts were either harvested as an entire segment or as the superior two-thirds of clavicle, leaving the inferior one-third in situ with pectoralis attachments intact. All grafts reached from the bottom of C2 to the top of T2. When the entire length of exposed clavicle was mobilized, it could cover 5–6 levels. The case report highlights technical challenges of this procedure in a living patient and provides clinical context for its potential utility in reconstruction of the ventral cervical spine. This surgical technique is best suited for patients with long-segment cervical defects and an increased risk of pseudarthrosis. Further clinical experience with this technique is required before definitive conclusions can be made. Level of Evidence: 5

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is managed by avoiding hypotension and elevating mean arterial pressure (MAP) to attain optimal perfusion of the spinal cord. Few studies have been published regarding complications related to this treatment paradigm. CLINICAL PRESENTATION Three patients with SCI developed posterior reversible encephalopathic syndrome (PRES) during treatment with intravenous fluids and vasopressors administered to maintain elevated MAPs. All of them experienced temporary elevations well above the standard blood pressure goals for acute SCI and deterioration of neurological status. CONCLUSION PRES is a potential complication of elevated MAPs in patients with SCI, particularly if the blood pressure rises above the goals of standard treatment paradigms. The neurosurgical staff should be suspicious of possible PRES early in the course of acute SCI in patients with unexplained neurological decline. This case series is the first report of PRES in patients with acute SCI.

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using various three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, synthetic spine models can be manufactured to mimic a human spine in its gross and radiographic anatomy and the biomechanical performance of bony and ligamentous tissue. These manufacturing processes have not, however, been used in combination to create a long-segment, biomimetic model of a patient with scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a biomimetic scoliosis model and early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning and education platform. Methods: Synthetic spine models were printed to mimic the anatomy and biomechanical performance of 2 adult patients with scoliosis. Preoperatively, the models were surgically corrected by the attending surgeon of each patient. Patients then underwent surgical correction of their spinal deformities. Correction of the models was compared to the surgical correction in the patients. Results: Patient 1 had a preoperative coronal Cobb angle of 40° from L1 to S1, as did the patient’s synthetic spine model. The patient’s spine model was corrected to 17.6°, and the patient achieved a correction of 17.3°. Patient 2 had a preoperative mid-thoracic Cobb angle of 88° and an upper thoracic Cobb angle of 43°. Preoperatively, the patient’s spine model was corrected to 19.5° and 9.2° for the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic curves, respectively. Immediately after surgery, the patient’s mid-thoracic and upper thoracic Cobb angles measured 18.7° and 9.5°, respectively. In both cases, the use of the spine models preoperatively changed the attending surgeon’s operative plan. Conclusions: A novel synthetic spine model for corrective scoliosis procedures is presented, along with early clinical experience using this model as a surgical planning platform. This model has tremendous potential not only as a surgical planning platform but also as an adjunct to patient consent, surgical education, and biomechanical research.

Background:. Rotational vascularized autografts are ideal for achieving spinal arthrodesis because they maintain bony vascularization while avoiding the morbidity and challenges of free-tissue transfer. Although proximal ribs are ideal candidates for vascularized bone grafts, their use is restricted to the thoracic spine. This study describes a novel technique for harvesting lateral rib grafts on an intercostal pedicle for use in cervical and lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis. Methods:. Six cadaveric dissections were performed (2 included upper and all 6 included lower rib dissections). Measurements included graft width and thickness, distance reached from harvest level to the top of the graft, and ipsilateral and contralateral spine levels reached by the graft. Results:. Overall, 60 lateral rib grafts were harvested. Intercostal vessel pedicles were torn during harvest in 4/48 (8.3%) of the lower rib and 5/12 (41.7%) of the upper rib grafts. Mean measurements of successful upper rib grafts were 1.4 ± 0.12 cm × 0.5 ± 0.15 cm (width × thickness), 14.1 ± 2.79 cm (distance) reached, and C2 (occiput–C4) reached ipsilaterally and C3 (occiput–C5) reached contralaterally. Mean lower rib graft measurements were 1.4 ± 0.26 cm × 0.4 ± 0.15 cm (width × thickness), 18.0 ± 6.19 cm (distance), S1 (L1–S2) reached ipsilaterally, and L4 (L1–S1) reached contralaterally. Conclusions:. It is technically feasible to rotate a far-lateral rib graft on an intercostal pedicle into the posterolateral cervical or lumbar spine for the augmentation of arthrodesis. Upper ribs seem to be more difficult to harvest and rotate while keeping the intercostal pedicle intact than lower ribs.

Background We examined the biomechanical performance of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed vertebra on pedicle screw insertional torque (IT), axial pullout (APO), and stiffness (ST) testing. Materials and methods Seventy-three anatomically identical L5 vertebral body models (146 pedicles) were printed and tested for IT, APO, and ST using single-threaded pedicle screws of equivalent diameter (6.5 mm), length (40.0 mm), and thread pitch (2.6 mm). Print properties (material, cortical thickness [number of shells], cancellous density [in-fill], in-fill pattern, print orientation) varied among models. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the effects of variables on outcomes. Results The type of material significantly affected IT, APO, and ST (P < 0.001, all comparisons). For acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) models, in-fill density (25-35%) had a positive linear association with APO (P = 0.002), ST (P = 0.008), and IT (P = 0.10); similarly for the polylactic acid (PLA) models, APO (P = 0.001), IT (P < 0.001), and ST (P = 0.14). For the nylon material type, in-fill density did not affect any tested parameter. For a given in-fill density, material, and print orientation, the in-fill pattern significantly affected IT (P = 0.002) and APO (P = 0.03) but not ST (P = 0.23). Print orientation also significantly affected IT (P < 0.001), APO (P < 0.001), and ST (P = 0.002). Conclusions 3D-printed vertebral body models with specific print parameters can be designed to perform analogously to human bone on pedicle screw tests of IT, APO, and ST. Altering the material, in-fill density, in-fill pattern, and print orientation of synthetic vertebral body models could reliably produce a model that mimics bone of a specific bone mineral density.

Background: The Schwab osteotomy grading scale—a unified osteotomy classification system created in 2014 by Schwab et al .—is one of many concepts in spine surgery that require detailed knowledge of 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy. 3D-printed spine models have demonstrated increasing utility in spine surgery as they more quickly communicate information on complex 3D anatomical relationships than planar imaging or 2-dimensional images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a custom, 3D-printed spine model to help surgical trainees understand and perform the Schwab osteotomy grading scale. Methods: Eight participants were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 received written instructional materials about the Schwab osteotomy grading scale, whereas group 2 received both written materials and a 3D-printed model of the spine with osteotomy regions demarcated. All participants were administered written and practical examinations. Results: The group randomized to receive the 3D-printed model performed significantly better on both the written assessment (mean score, 7.75±0.50 vs . 5.75±0.50, P=0.023) and the practical examination (mean score, 1.75±0.32 vs . 1.08±0.09, P=0.025) than the group that received only written instructions. Conclusions: Our results support the conclusion that this 3D-printed spine model is an effective adjunct to help early surgical trainees understand the Schwab osteotomy grading scale. Participants who received the model in addition to the source manuscript demonstrated improved theoretical knowledge and better performance on practical tests of complex spinal osteotomies. Similar models are likely to have utility in surgical training programs and as patient education models.

Background The Living Spine Model (LSM) is a three-dimensionally printed, surgical training platform developed by neurosurgical residents. Objective To evaluate the face and content validity of this model as a training tool for open posterior lumbar surgery. Methods Six surgeons with varying experience were asked to complete L3-5 pedicle screw fixation and L3-4 laminectomy on an LSM. Face validity was measured using a questionnaire, and content validity was measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) tests. Student's t-test was used to compare NASA TLX responses between junior and senior residents and to compare responses for live surgery vs simulated surgery on the LSM. Results Junior residents took the longest time to complete the procedure, followed by senior residents and the attending surgeon (136.5, 98.3, and 84 min, respectively). The junior residents placed fewer successful pedicle screws (7/12) than senior residents and attending surgeon (18/18). All tested components of the model had excellent face validity, with scores ranging from 60% to 97%. Content validity testing demonstrated that the LSMs created overall workloads and specific types of work like live operating conditions. Conclusion The overall validity testing of the LSM demonstrates the high-potential utility of this model as a surgical education and testing platform for open posterior lumbar procedures. The LSM has great potential as an adjunct to surgical education, and it may become an increasingly important component of surgical resident curricula in the future.

Background An increasing body of literature describing use of high-fidelity surgical training models is challenging long-held dogma that cadavers provide the best medium for postgraduate surgical skills training. The purpose of this study was to describe a surgical skills course comprising entirely synthetic training models developed by resident and attending neurosurgeons and to evaluate their perceptions of the overall usefulness of this course and its usefulness compared with cadaveric courses. Methods Ten high-fidelity neurosurgical training models were developed. A neurosurgical skills course for residents was structured to include 7 spinal and 3 cranial learning stations, each with its own model and assigned attending expert. Resident and attending neurosurgeons were asked to complete surveys on their overall impressions of the course and models and on workload comparisons between models and real cases. Student t tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results Survey responses were collected from 9 of 16 participating residents (56.3%) and 3 of 10 attending neurosurgeons (30.0%). Both groups believed that the course was very helpful overall to resident education. Respondents furthermore believed that the course was more helpful overall than cadaveric courses. Task load index testing showed no significant workload difference between models and real cases (P ≥ 0.17), except in temporal demand (P Conclusions Resident and attending neurosurgeons subjectively believe that high-fidelity synthetic models were superior to cadavers as a surgical skills teaching platform. This study raises the question of whether cadavers should remain the gold standard for surgical skills courses. Expanded use of these teaching models and further study are warranted.

Supplementary_Material for The Barrow Biomimetic Spine: Face, Content, and Construct Validity of a 3D-Printed Spine Model for Freehand and Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Insertion by Michael A. Bohl, Rohit Mauria, James J. Zhou, Michael A. Mooney, Joseph D. DiDomenico, Sarah McBryan, Claudio Cavallo, Peter Nakaji, Steve W. Chang, Juan S. Uribe, Jay D. Turner, and U. Kumar Kakarla in Global Spine Journal

Pedicle screws provide superior fixation of the subaxial cervical spine to other techniques. However, a high degree of accuracy is required for safe placement given the proximity of pedicles to critical neurovascular structures. A variety of techniques are described to maximize accuracy, including freehand, fluoroscopy-guided, and neuronavigation-based methods. We present a technique for the placement of pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine using direct visualization of the pedicle in a patient who required an occipito-cervical fusion construct in the setting of a C2 chordoma. A laminotomy or laminectomy is performed laterally to allow for visualization of the medial, superior, and inferior walls of the pedicle. The entry point for screw placement is determined based on pedicle anatomy and is typically 1 to 2 mm lateral to the midpoint of the lateral mass, just below the base of the superior articulating process. Screw trajectory is determined by visualizing the pedicle borders and is aimed at the junction of the medial pedicle wall, with the posterior vertebral body down the pedicle axis. Tactile feedback (loss of resistance) is used to assess for a breach while drilling. The cannulation is then tapped, and the screw is placed in a standard fashion. Direct visualization of pedicle anatomy can be a useful adjunct to guide the safe placement of subaxial pedicle screws when superior fixation is required or when normal anatomy is distorted. The technique may be combined with fluoroscopic or navigation-based techniques to provide real-time anatomic guidance during screw placement. The patient provided informed, written consent for this procedure before surgery. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

Introduction The Barrow Biomimetic Spine project is an ongoing effort to develop a three-dimensional (3D)-printed synthetic spine model with high anatomical and biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of an L4-L5 3D-printed synthetic spine model in a lordotic correction test after Schwab grade 2 osteotomies as compared to human cadaveric spines that have undergone the same osteotomies and lordotic correction. Methods Ten different L4-L5 synthetic spine models were 3D printed. Each print varied in either the material used for the soft tissue components, the infill density of the bony and soft tissue structures, the pre-correction disc height, or the model orientation on the print bed. Each print was instrumented with pedicle screws and underwent a Schwab grade 2 osteotomy. Changes in disc height measurements and end-plate angle were compared against cadaveric data acquired using the same study method. Results A simple linear correlation analysis demonstrated that for horizontally printed models using PolyFlex (Polymaker, New York, NY, USA)(models 1-3, 8, 10), the pre-correction posterior disc height and lordotic correction were moderately correlated (r = 0.56), but this correlation did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.12). Regression analysis demonstrated a very strong correlation between lordotic correction and change in posterior disc height (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Models printed either vertically (models 4-6) or with low bone density and high soft tissue density (model 10) appeared to perform the most similarly to the cadaveric tissue. Discussion The 3D-printed synthetic spine models demonstrated predictable and reliable performance in a lordotic correction test based on their respective material qualities and print densities. The print variables tested further demonstrated that this model is capable of achieving high biomechanical fidelity to cadaveric tissue when subjected to the same lordotic correction test after Schwab grade 2 osteotomies.

Objective The Barrow Innovation Center comprises an educational program in medical innovation that enables residents to identify problems in patient care and rapidly develop and implement solutions to these problems. Residents involved in this program noted an elevated risk of iatrogenic spinal cord injury during posterior cervical and thoracic procedures. The objective of this study was to describe this complication, and a novel solution was developed through a new innovation training program. Methods A case report demonstrates the risk of iatrogenic spinal cord injury during posterior cervical decompression and fusion. Solutions to this problem were developed at the innovation center via an iterative process of prototype creation, cadaveric testing, and redesign. Patent law students who partnered with the center wrote and filed a provisional patent protecting the novel prototype designs. Results The concept of a protective shield for the spinal cord was developed, and within only 6 weeks the devices were provisionally patented and used in the operating room. This device was named the Myeloshield. Initial clinical experience indicates that the Myeloshield can be used without impeding the flow of surgery and has the potential to prevent iatrogenic spinal cord injury; this experience is presented through 2 case reports demonstrating the use of Myeloshields in the operating room. Conclusions This report demonstrates how programs like the Barrow Innovation Center can provide neurosurgery residents with a unique educational experience in medical device innovation and intellectual property development and can serve as an avenue of surgical quality improvement and problem solving.

Objective and subjective fluoroscopic assessments of a new synthetic spine model.The aim of this study was to analyze the fluoroscopic performance and fidelity to human tissue of a new synthetic spine model.The Barrow Biomimetic Spine project aims to develop a 3-dimensional (3D) printed, synthetic spine model that will one day replace cadaveric tissue in spine biomechanical research. A crucial component to any biomimetic spine model is that it performs similarly to cadaveric tissue on standard diagnostic imaging modalities.Numerous L5 vertebral bodies (VBs) were 3D printed with variable shell thicknesses and internal densities, and fluoroscopic images were taken of these models to measure cortical thickness and gray-scale density. An L3-L5 spinal segment was then printed, and fluoroscopic films were obtained at variable C-arm angles. Three spine surgeons subjectively scored these images for human fidelity. Pedicle screws were then placed into the L3-L5 segment to demonstrate successful or breached placement. Standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral films were taken, and three spine surgeons were tested and scored on correctly identifying screw placement.Cortical thickness and gray-scale density testing demonstrated an upward trend with increases in relevant print settings. Subjective scoring demonstrated nearly perfect fidelity for the L3-L5 model. Surgeon identification of screw placement on the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views also demonstrated nearly perfect fidelity.This study is the first to demonstrate that 3D-printed VB and segmental spine models accurately mimic human tissue on C-arm fluoroscopy, not only in respect to their anatomical appearance in standard views but also in their response to surgical manipulation and the variations in C-arm angle that commonly occur in the operating room. As such, these spine models have the potential to serve as an excellent platform for future research and surgical education programs.N/A.

BACKGROUND Posterior column osteotomy (PCO) is a powerful technique for correcting lordosis, but the surgical literature lacks objective evidence on preoperative predictors of achievable lordotic correction following PCO. OBJECTIVE To measure the correlation between disc geometry and achievable lordotic correction following Schwab grade 2 osteotomies and to describe geometric changes to disc space following lordotic correction. METHODS Schwab grade 2 osteotomies were performed from T1 to S1 in 5 cadavers. Lateral radiographs were taken before and after posterior column compression. Anterior disc height (ADH), middle disc height (MDH), posterior disc height (PDH), and lordotic angles were measured. The association between disc height and lordotic correction was analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS For all spinal levels (n = 79), PDH was most strongly correlated with lordotic correction (r = 0.72, P

A frequently encountered problem during posterolateral fusion (PLF) is bone graft displacement from the posterolateral space during closure. Commercially available solutions to this problem are seldom used because of their exceptionally high cost. The purpose of this report is to describe 3 novel, low-cost techniques we developed for bone graft containment during PLF.Three low-cost bone graft containment techniques are described: rapid suture weave, makeshift bone bag, and cellulose rooftop. Early clinical experience with these techniques is reported for a 5-patient case series.One or more of these bone graft containment techniques were used in 5 patients who underwent PLF. Rapid suture weave was the least expensive ($5.00) but required the longest additional time to perform (20 minutes). Makeshift bone bag and cellulose rooftop cost approximately the same ($48.00 and $46.00, respectively); the makeshift bone bag took less additional time (3 minutes) but created a potential barrier between the bone graft and the host site, whereas the cellulose rooftop took slightly longer to perform (5 minutes) but permitted direct contact between the bone graft and host site.These 3 novel surgical techniques for bone graft containment in the posterolateral space add minimally to the cost and length of the procedure. Our early clinical experience suggests that these techniques are safe and effective. Additional clinical experience is warranted, and prospective data collection is ongoing.

Background Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) are described as having superior osteogenicity, osteoconductivity, and osteoinductivity compared with other graft types and have been used in high-risk patients to augment arthrodesis. Pedicled VBGs are rotated on an intact vascular pedicle and therefore maintain all the benefits of VBGs but avoid many of the challenges and additional morbidity of free-tissue transfer. This study describes a novel surgical technique for rotating vascularized spinous process into the posterolateral space for augmenting arthrodesis in patients undergoing posterolateral fusion (PLF). Methods A technique is described for rotating the spinous process into the posterolateral space on an intact vascular pedicle of paraspinal muscle. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes are reported for 4 patients who have undergone this procedure. Results Four patients were treated with a single or 2-level PLF combined with posterior, anterior, or lateral interbody fusion and vascularized spinous process graft. Three-month postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated a dislodged graft in 1 patient and successful arthrodesis in 3 patients. Additional operative time taken for graft harvest and implantation ranged from 22 minutes for the first patient to 6 minutes for the fourth patient. Conclusions Rotation of vascularized spinous process graft for augmentation of posterolateral arthrodesis in the lumbar spine is a potentially safe, effective surgical technique that results in successful arthrodesis in as little as 3 months but requires further study. This technique is expected to add little additional time or morbidity to the traditional lumbar PLF because it requires no separate incision or additional bone removal.

When a dural defect is encountered during spine surgery, the dura mater must be reconstituted to minimize the occurrence of minor or major life-threatening sequelae. The neurosurgical literature lacks strategies for managing large dural defects encountered during surgery. The authors describe a 24-year-old man who developed cauda equina syndrome secondary to altered CSF flow in a large thoracolumbar arachnoid cyst. Surgical decompression and fenestration of the arachnoid cyst were performed, and the large dural defect was treated using a multilayer closure with collagen matrix, titanium mesh, and methylmethacrylate. At his 24-month postoperative follow-up, the patient had recovered full strength in his legs, and his sensory deficits and sexual dysfunction had resolved. His incision had healed well, and there were no signs of pseudomeningocele. He had no additional positional headaches. The defect was managed effectively with this technique. Although this technique is not a first-line strategy for dural closure in the spine, it can be considered in challenging cases when large dural defects are not amenable to traditional closure techniques.

Study Design Cadaveric feasibility study and case report. Objective To determine if it is feasible to rotate pedicled vascularized bone graft (VBG) from L1 to S1 via a posterior approach. Summary of Background Data VBG has been used to successfully augment fusion rates in various skeletal pathologies. Pedicled VBG has numerous advantages over free-transfer VBG, including the maintenance of a robust vascular supply to the graft without the need for vascular anastomoses. Pedicled VBG options have not been well described for posterior lumbosacral fusion. Methods A multidisciplinary team of plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons hypothesized that it is feasible to rotate pedicled VBG from L1 to S1 via a posterior approach. In six cadavers, two VBG donor sites were evaluated: posterior element (PE-VBG) and iliac crest (IC-VBG). A single case report of a patient with lumbar Charcot joint treated with IC-VBG is also presented. Results For the PE-VBG, the laminae and spinous processes were mobilized en bloc via Gill laminectomy on a unilateral sacrospinalis pedicle. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) length × width graft dimensions were 2.8±0.48 cm × 2.2±0.81 cm. The inter–transverse process (inter-TP) distance was less than the corresponding lamina length at all levels. For the IC-VBG, iliac crest was mobilized on a quadratus lumborum pedicle. Mean±SD length × width × thickness graft dimensions were 7.7±1.28 cm × 2.2±0.69 cm × 1.5±0.79 cm. The IC-VBGs reached from L1 (T12–S1) to S1 (S1–S3), and all IC-VBGs were able to cover three levels. Conclusions This feasibility cadaveric study and the case report are the first demonstrations that pedicled VBGs can be successfully applied to posterior lumbosacral spinal arthrodesis. Patients at high risk for nonunion may benefit from these strategies. Further clinical experience with these techniques is warranted. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Background Tethering after spinal surgery is caused by adhesions that arise from intradural tissue manipulation. Microsurgical detethering is the only treatment for symptomatic patients, but retethering occurs commonly and no treatment is widely available to prevent this complication. Objective To apply human amniotic membrane (HAM) grafts, which are immune-privileged and known to possess antifibrogenic properties, in patients requiring microsurgical detethering. For this first-in-human use, we evaluated the safety and potential efficacy of these grafts for preventing retethering. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who required detethering surgery and received an HAM graft between 2013 and 2016 at our institution after various previous intradural spinal surgeries. In all 14 cases, intradural lysis of adhesions was achieved, an HAM graft was sewn in place intradurally, and a dural patch was closed in a watertight fashion over the graft. Results Fourteen patients had received HAM grafts to prevent retethering. All patients had at least 6 mo of follow-up (mean follow-up, 14 mo). Retethering was noted in only 1 patient. Surgical re-exploration showed that the retethering occurred caudal to the edge of the HAM graft, with no tethering underneath the original graft. No complications were attributed specifically to the HAM graft placement. Conclusion This first-in-human series provides evidence that HAM grafts are a safe and potentially efficacious method for preventing retethering after microsurgical intradural lysis of adhesions. These results lay the groundwork for further prospective controlled trials in patients with this difficult-to-treat pathology.

BACKGROUND Arthrodesis is critical for achieving favorable outcomes in reconstructive spine surgery. Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) have been successfully used to augment fusion rates in a variety of skeletal pathologies, and pedicled VBG has numerous advantages over free transfer VBG. Pedicled VBG has not previously been described for the posterior occipitocervicothoracic spine. OBJECTIVE To identify, describe, and assess potential donor sites for pedicled VBGs from occiput to T12 using a cadaver model and to describe important technical considerations for graft harvest and placement. METHODS A multidisciplinary team of plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons hypothesized that it is feasible to rotate a pedicled VBG from the occiput to T12 via a posterior approach. In 6 cadavers, 3 VBG donor sites were identified as anatomically feasible: occiput, scapula, and rib. RESULTS Split- and full-thickness occipital VBGs were mobilized on a semispinalis pedicle. Occipital VBGs could be mobilized from occiput to T1 and span up to 4 levels. Scapular VBGs were mobilized on a subscapular pedicle and could be mobilized from occiput to T7 and span up to 8 levels. Rib VBGs were mobilized on subcostal pedicles and could be mobilized from C6 to T12. Ribs T2 to T4 and T11 and T12 could cover 2 levels, and ribs T5 to T10 could cover 3 levels. The first rib was anatomically unsuitable as a VBG due to its primarily ventral course. CONCLUSION Pedicled VBGs can feasibly be applied to posterior spinal arthrodesis from occiput to T12. Patients at high risk for nonunion may benefit from this strategy.

Tumoral calcinosis is characterized by tumor-like deposition of calcium in periarticular soft tissue. Spinal involvement is rare, and perioperative diagnosis of tumoral calcinosis can be difficult because lesions may be confused with bony neoplasms. Symptoms of tumoral calcinosis result from bony involvement and/or direct compression of surrounding anatomical structures, for which treatment with surgical decompression can be highly successful. The craniovertebral junction is rarely affected by tumoral calcinosis, and patients with this condition may present with distinct symptoms. Herein, to their knowledge the authors present the first case of tumoral calcinosis affecting the craniovertebral junction in a patient who presented with severe dysphagia and required transoral decompression. Recognition of tumoral calcinosis by neurosurgeons is essential for facilitating diagnosis and treatment, and the transoral approach is an effective method for decompression in select patients.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE Endovascular therapy has proven to be a safe, minimally invasive treatment for multiple etiologies, but proper precautions must be taken to avoid complications. When complications occur, they should be promptly identified and corrected when possible. This case report describes endovascular stents misplaced into the epidural spinous venous plexus rather than the iliofemoral arteries, causing cauda equina syndrome, as well as the spinal procedure performed to treat the resulting spinal canal compression. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 67-yr-old man had undergone what he thought was iliofemoral arterial stenting at an outside hospital for peripheral vascular disease. He presented 8 d later to our hospital with cauda equina syndrome comprising back pain, right L5 radiculopathy, perianal numbness, urinary retention, and constipation. Scans demonstrated stents deployed into the venous system, traversing the spinal canal and the right L5-S1 neural foramen, resulting in severe spinal canal stenosis, right L5-S1 foraminal stenosis, and moderate left S1-S2 foraminal stenosis. The patient underwent an L5-S1 laminectomy with full right L5-S1 facetectomy and left S1-S2 medial facetectomy, with associated L5-S1 posterolateral fusion with fixation to remove the stent and decompress the neural elements. CONCLUSION Although stent misplacement is an uncommon complication of endovascular therapy, this case demonstrates the importance of ensuring access to the proper vessel before stent placement. Once this complication was recognized, safe removal of the stents was possible and the patient demonstrated meaningful postoperative improvement in symptoms and strength.

Background Lumbar osteomyelitis frequently affects patients with medical comorbidities and poor preoperative health. Surgery is indicated when medical management fails or patients present with spinal instability or neural compromise. Successful arthrodesis can be difficult and sometimes requires alternative surgical techniques. Objective To report 3 novel methods, each illustrated by a case, for achieving arthrodesis for lumbar osteomyelitis. Methods A retrospective review was performed of 3 cases of surgical treatment of lumbar osteomyelitis. Novel aspects of the surgical techniques are reported, as are perioperative clinical details and imaging results. Results In the first patient, a vascularized iliac crest graft on a quadratus lumborum pedicle was rotated into the posterolateral fusion bed of the affected level. In the second, an anterior approach with debridement of affected lumbar levels was followed by rotation of a vascularized iliac crest graft on an iliacus muscle pedicle into the anterior lumbar defect. In the third, a structural, nonvascularized iliac crest graft was harvested via a lateral approach to provide better surgical access, and an autologous tricortical bone graft was obtained for placement in the debridement defect. Follow-up imaging suggested successful early incorporation of all the grafts in the fusion beds. Conclusion Patients with multiple risk factors for pseudarthrosis and recurrent infection often require alternative surgical strategies to augment fusion. These 3 novel methods for lumbar debridement, fixation, and fusion using vascularized or nonvascularized autograft accommodate posterior, anterior, and lateral surgical approaches. Further experience with these techniques is required to compare outcomes with those of traditional techniques.