1. Diagnostic performance of an ultra-sensitive RDT and a conventional RDT in malaria mass testing, treatment and tracking interventions in southern Ghana
- Author
-
Linda Eva Amoah, Ndong Ignatius Cheng, Festus Kojo Acquah, Susan Adu-Amankwah, Dorcas Gyama Bredu, Benedicta A. Mensah, Sherik-fa Anang, Bernice Cubson Abban, Abena Busayomi, Sebastian Shine Kwarpong, Prosper Kofi Tey, Elizabeth Cudjoe, Alexander Asamoah, Tobias McKenzie Holden, Jaline Gerardin, Justice Nonvignon, and Collins Ahorlu
- Subjects
Malaria ,RDT ,Ultra-sensitive ,MTTT ,Ghana ,PET-PCR ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Abstract Background Application of numerous malaria control interventions has led to reduction in clinical malaria cases and deaths but also the realisation that asymptomatic parasite carriers play a key role in sustaining transmission. This study assessed the effectiveness of using the Ultra-sensitive NxTek eliminate RDT (uRDT) and conventional SD Bioline HRP2 RDT (cRDT) in diagnosing asymptomatic parasitaemia while measuring the impact of mass testing, treatment and tracking (MTTT) on the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria over a 1-year period in Ghana. Methods A total of 4000 targeted participants from two towns, Obom and Kofi Kwei, with their surrounding villages, were tested for asymptomatic malaria four times over the study period using uRDT (intervention) and the cRDT (control) respectively. Participants carrying malaria parasites were followed by home visit and phone calls for compliance to treatment, and filter paper blood blots collected from participants were used to determine true parasite carriage by PET-PCR. A mathematical model of the study site was developed and used to test the impact of test sensitivity and mass migration on the effect of MTTT. Results The start and end point sensitivities of the cRDT were 48.8% and 41.7% and those for the uRDT were 52.9% and 59.9% respectively. After a year of MTTTs, asymptomatic parasite prevalence, as determined by PCR, did not differ statistically in the control site (40.6% to 40.1%, P = 0.730) but decreased at the intervention site (55.9% to 46.4%, P
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF