Search

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the renal outcomes, including the time course of renal function, after elective PCI in patients with advanced renal dysfunction and to assess the predictors of renal dysfunction progression. This is a subanalysis of a previous observational multicenter study that investigated long-term clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal dysfunction (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), focusing on 151 patients who underwent elective PCI and their long-term renal outcomes. Renal dysfunction progression was defined as a 20% relative decrease in eGFR at 1 year from baseline or the initiation of permanent dialysis within 1 year. Progression of renal dysfunction at 1 year occurred in 42 patients (34.1%). Among patients with renal dysfunction progression, the decrease of renal function from baseline was not observed at 1 month but after 6 months of the index PCI. Baseline eGFR and serum albumin level were significant predictors of renal dysfunction progression at 1 year. Among 111 patients who had not been initiated on dialysis within 1 year, those with renal dysfunction progression had a significantly higher incidence of dialysis initiation more than 1 year after the index PCI than those with preserved renal function (p < 0.001). Among patients with advanced renal dysfunction who underwent elective PCI, 34.1% showed renal dysfunction progression at 1 year. The decrease in renal function was not observed at 1 month but after 6 months of the index PCI in patients with renal dysfunction progression. Furthermore, patients with renal dysfunction progression had poorer long-term renal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data about the clinical outcomes of ACS patients with advanced renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. Methods: We examined the data obtained from 194 ACS patients with non-dialysis advanced renal dysfunction who underwent PCI at five hospitals. The primary composite endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke). Results: Eighty patients (41.2%) were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 117 patients (58.8%) with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Overall patients were followed for a median of 657.5 days. Cumulative incidence of MACCE at median follow-up was 32.3% (45.4% for STEMI and 23.4% for NSTE-ACS). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in the STEMI group had significantly higher incidence of MACCE than those in the non-STEMI and unstable angina group (Log-rank p < 0.001). In-hospital MACCE rate was higher in the STEMI group than in the NSTE-ACS group, whereas post-discharge MACCE rate was comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, STEMI and Killip classification ≥ 2 were associated with in-hospital MACCE. On the other hand, body mass index and serum albumin at admission were independent predictors of post-discharge MACCE. Conclusions: Short- and long-term prognoses following PCI in non-dialysis patients with ACS and advanced renal dysfunction is still unfavorable. STEMI and Killip classification ≥ 2 were independent predictors for in-hospital MACCE, and body mass index and serum albumin were for post-discharge MACCE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has had a great impact on medical care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of hospital admissions has been lower and the rate of in-hospital mortality has been higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Western countries. However, in Japan, it is unknown whether the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the incidence of ACS. In the study, eleven hospitals in the Tokai region participated. Among enrolled hospital, we compared the incidence of ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic (April and May, 2020) with that in equivalent months in the preceding year as the control. During the study period; April and May 2020, 248 patients with ACS were admitted. Compared to April and May 2019, a decline of 8.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-12.1; P = 0.33] in admissions for ACS was observed between April and May 2020. There was no significant difference in the strategy for revascularization and in-hospital deaths between 2019 and 2020. In conclusion, the rate of admission for ACS slightly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the same months in the preceding year. Moreover, degeneration of therapeutic procedures for ACS did not occur., Competing Interests: There is no conflict of interest regarding the manuscript.

Background: Data regarding the clinical features, outcomes and prognostic factors in patients presenting with acute total/subtotal occlusion of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) remain limited.Methods and Results:From a multi-center registry, 134 patients due to acute total/subtotal occlusion of the unprotected LMCA were reviewed. Emergency room (ER) status classification was defined according to the presence of cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) in the ER (class 1=no cardiogenic shock; class 2= cardiogenic shock but not CPA; and class 3=CPA). In-hospital mortality and cerebral performance category (CPC) as the endpoints were evaluated. One-half (67/134) of the enrolled patients presented with total occlusion of the unprotected LMCA. Regarding ER status classification, class 1, 2, and 3 were observed in 30.6%, 45.5%, and 23.9% of the patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in 73 (54.5%) patients; of the remaining patients, 52 (85.3%) could be discharged with a CPC 1 or 2. ER status classification (odds ratio 4.4 [95% confidence interval: 2.33-10.67]; P<0.001) and total occlusion of the unprotected LMCA (odds ratio 8.29 [95% confidence interval 2.93-23.46]; P<0.001) were strong predictors of in-hospital mortality., Conclusions: Acute total/subtotal occlusion involving the unprotected LMCA appeared to be associated with high in-hospital mortality. ER status classification and initial flow in the unprotected LMCA were significant predictive factors of in-hospital mortality.

Background: Octogenarians, who are frequently frail, represent a large proportion of patients admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We investigated the relationship between frailty, assessed by the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and short- and mid-term prognoses in octogenarian STEMI patients.Methods and Results:We used a multicenter registry data of 1,301 patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2014 and December 2016. Of them, 273 were retrospectively analyzed after categorization into 3 groups based on the preadmission CFS (CFS 1-3, 140 patients; CFS 4-5, 99 patients; and CFS 6-8, 34 patients). We evaluated the influence of CFS on overall mortality at 2 years and on non-home discharge, defined as the composite of in-hospital death and new transfer to a hospital or nursing home. During the study period (median, 565 days), the overall mortality and ratio of non-home discharge increased as CFS increased. After adjustment for multivariable analysis, the severely frail continued to be significantly associated with an increased risk of overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-5.05; P=0.026) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 9.50; 95% CI 3.48-25.99; P<0.001)., Conclusions: Frailty, as assessed by CFS, had an influence on short- and mid-term prognoses in octogenarian patients with STEMI.