Search

Supplemental tables S1-S15

Lineage plasticity is implicated in treatment resistance in multiple cancers. In lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) amenable to targeted therapy, transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recognized resistance mechanism. Defining molecular mechanisms of neuroendocrine (NE) transformation in lung cancer has been limited by a paucity of pre/posttransformation clinical samples. Detailed genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and protein characterization of combined LUAD/SCLC tumors, as well as pre/posttransformation samples, supports that NE transformation is primarily driven by transcriptional reprogramming rather than mutational events. We identify genomic contexts in which NE transformation is favored, including frequent loss of the 3p chromosome arm. We observed enhanced expression of genes involved in the PRC2 complex and PI3K/AKT and NOTCH pathways. Pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway delayed tumor growth and NE transformation in an EGFR-mutant patient-derived xenograft model. Our findings define a novel landscape of potential drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities of NE transformation in lung cancer.Significance:The difficulty in collection of transformation samples has precluded the performance of molecular analyses, and thus little is known about the lineage plasticity mechanisms leading to LUAD-to-SCLC transformation. Here, we describe biological pathways dysregulated upon transformation and identify potential predictors and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of NE transformation in the lung.See related commentary by Meador and Lovly, p. 2962.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2945

Supplemental figures and figure legends.

Lineage plasticity contributes to therapeutic resistance in cancer. In lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), this phenomenon drives neuroendocrine (NE) and squamous cell (LUSC) histologic transdifferentiation in the context of acquired resistance to targeted inhibition of driver mutations, with up to 14% and 9% incidences in EGFR-mutant tumors relapsed on EGFR inhibitors, respectively. Notably, survival of patients with NE- or LUSC-transdifferentiated tumors is lower than that of either LUAD or de novo LUSC patients. To date, little is known about the molecular effectors enhancing lineage plasticity and driving histological transdifferentiation due to the paucity of well annotated pre- and post-transdifferentiation clinical samples amenable for molecular analyses. Currently no specific therapies for LUSC or NE transdifferentiation prevention are available for patients at high risk of transformation. We performed multi-omic profiling of transdifferentiating clinical samples, as well as control never-transformed LUAD and de novo LUSC and small cell carcinomas, including comprehensive and integrative genomic (whole exome sequencing), epigenomic (bisulfite sequencing), transcriptomic (RNAseq) and protein (antibody arrays) characterization. Findings were validated in preclinical models including cell lines as well as LUSC- and NE-transdifferentiation patient-derived xenograft models. Our data suggest that histological transdifferentiation is driven by epigenetic -rather than mutational- events, and indicate that transdifferentiated tumors retain molecular features of their previous LUAD state. Integrative analysis revealed biological pathways dysregulated specifically for distinct histological outcomes, including downregulation of RTK signaling and Notch-related genes in NE-transformed tumors, and upregulation of genes involved in Hedgehog and Notch signaling and MYC targets in LUSC-transdifferentiated tumors. Most interestingly, these analyses revealed commonly dysregulated pathways for transdifferentiated tumors, including marked downregulation of a variety of immune-related pathways and upregulation of genes involved in AKT signaling and in the PRC2 epigenetic remodeling complex. Concurrent activation of AKT and MYC overexpression induced a squamous phenotype in EGFR-mutant LUAD preclinical models, further accentuated by EGFR inhibition. Pharmacological targeting of AKT in combination with osimertinib delayed both squamous and NE transformation in EGFR-mutant patient-derived xenograft transdifferentiation models. These results identify common and histology-specific drivers and dysregulated pathways in NE and LUSC transdifferentiation, and nominate AKT as a therapeutic target to constrain lineage plasticity and prevent the acquisition of resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies through histological transdifferentiation. Citation Format: Alvaro Quintanal-Villalonga, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Yingqian A. Zhan, Fathema Uddin, Viola Allaj, Parvathy Manoj, Nisargbhai S. Shah, Umesh K. Bhanot, Jacklynn Egger, Juan Qiu, Elisa de Stanchina, Natasha Rekhtman, Brian Houck-Loomis, Richard P. Koche, Helena A. Yu, Triparna Sen, Charles M. Rudin. AKT pathway as a therapeutic target to constrain lineage plasticity leading to histological transdifferentiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 658.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease characterized by early metastasis and exceptional lethality, comprising 13% of all lung cancer cases. With few treatment options, typically resulting in only transient responses, SCLC is responsible for approximately 250,000 deaths globally per year. The backbone of SCLC treatment over the past several decades has been platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, with the recent addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy showing limited benefit in a small subset of patients. Major hurdles to improving SCLC treatment include development of rapid chemoresistance and ineffective second line therapies. The identification of more durably effective therapeutic strategies is a major unmet clinical need. Here, we performed an in vitro CRISPR screen in SCLC cell lines from all major SCLC subtypes, including short-term cultured cells from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), to identify potential therapeutic targets to enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy. Candidate hits were validated genetically and pharmacologically with in vitro synergy assays, in vivo clonal competition assays and pharmacologic assessments in PDX models. Signaling pathways were studied by RNA sequencing and western blot, and toxicity studies were performed in vivo to assess the safety of the agents at pharmacologically effective doses. We performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess expression of candidate targets in tissue microarrays (TMAs). Our CRISPR screen revealed the nuclear exporter exportin 1 (encoded by the XPO1 gene) as a promising target sensitizing to chemotherapy, independently of the SCLC subtype. We found that XPO1 mRNA expression was higher in SCLC than in any other solid tumor or hematological malignancy, and demonstrated consistently high protein expression by IHC in clinical TMAs. A potent and selective exportin 1 inhibitor, selinexor, is approved for use in hematological malignancies. Combination of selinexor with cisplatin or irinotecan demonstrated synergy in vitro and efficacy in vivo in an array of chemonäive and chemoresistant SCLC PDXs, including all major SCLC subtypes. The combinations were well tolerated in mice. The chemo-sensitizing effects of selinexor were associated with suppression of chemotherapy-induced AKT activation. In conclusion, exportin 1 inhibition strongly enhances sensitivity of SCLC tumors to cisplatin and irinotecan, used in first line and second line treatment of SCLC tumors, respectively, and these effects are independent of the SCLC subtype. These results provide preclinical rationale for the combination of selinexor with cisplatin or irinotecan in naïve and relapsed SCLC. The clinical availability of selinexor will allow rapid clinical translation of these results in a disease setting with extremely limited therapeutic options. Citation Format: Alvaro Quintanal-Villalonga, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Yuan Hao, Andrew Chow, Yingqian A. Zhan, Fathema Uddin, Viola Allaj, Parvathy Manoj, Nisargbhai S. Shah, Umesh K. Bhanot, Juan Qiu, Elisa de Stanchina, Richard P. Koche, Triparna Sen, John T. Poirier, Charles M. Rudin. Exportin 1 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3594.

Lineage plasticity, a capacity to reprogram cell phenotypic identity under evolutionary pressure, is implicated in treatment resistance and metastasis in multiple cancers. In lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) amenable to treatment with targeted inhibitors, transformation to an aggressive neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma resembling small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recognized mechanism of acquired resistance. Defining molecular mechanisms of NE transformation in lung cancer has been limited by a paucity of well annotated pre- and post-transformation clinical samples. We hypothesized that mixed histology LUAD/SCLC tumors may capture cancer cells proximal to, and on either side of, histologic transformation. We performed detailed genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic characterization of combined LUAD/SCLC tumors as well as pre- and post-transformation clinical samples. Our data support that NE transformation is primarily driven by transcriptional reprogramming rather than mutational events. We identify genomic contexts in which NE transformation is favored, including frequent loss of the 3p chromosome arm in pre-transformation LUADs. Consistent shifts in gene expression programs in NE transformation include induction of several stem/progenitor cell regulatory pathways, including upregulation of PRC2 and WNT signaling, and suppression of Notch pathway activity. We observe induction of PI3K/AKT and an immunosuppressive phenotype in NE transformation. Taken together our findings define a novel landscape of potential drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities of NE transformation in lung cancer.

In chronic pancreatitis (CP), fibrous replacement of exocrine tissue spares islets. There is local production of IFNgamma and death ligands by inflammatory cells as well as TGFbeta and TRAIL by pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), along with functional death receptor neo-expression and apoptosis in exocrine but not in endocrine cells. Moreover, islets are strongly induced for TRAIL-receptor(R)-4 lacking a functional death domain. TRAIL-R4 signalling in T-cells induces NFkappaB transcription factors which activate anti-apoptotic programs. Whether TRAIL elicits this response in endocrine cells, we tested human insulinoma cell line CM and determined NFkappaB subunits transcripts and NFkappaB dependent inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) in normal pancreas (NP) and CP. We treated CM with cytokines, determined TRAIL-R expression by flow cytometry, graded degree of fibrosis in CP specimens, microdissected epithelial compartments, performed real time PCRs for NFkappaB subunits transcripts, and immunohistochemistry for IKK-gamma, IkappaB-alpha, RelA, survivin, and cIAP1. In CM, TGFbeta/IFNgamma/TRAIL induced TRAIL-R4 surface expression. TRAIL/ IFNgamma, upregulated NFkappaB subunits and survivin while down-modulating 1kappaBalpha. NP epithelia had low RNA levels of NFkappaB subunits. These were increased in parenchymal areas of CP with severe fibrosis and most intensely in islets. The NFkappaB regulated proteins IkappaBalpha, survivin, and cIAP1 were found in corresponding sites, again, at highest levels in islets surrounded by fibrosis. In CP, islets not only evade immune attack by non-exposure of functional death receptors in presence of TRAIL-R4. They also neo-express NFkappaB subunits, survivin, and cIAP1. This apoptosis-inhibitory security program might be enforced by PSC-derived TRAIL.