Search

Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) with those of normal vaginal birth (NVB) in a tertiary hospital in China., Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,024 women who birthed vaginally between January 2019 and December 2020. The VBAC group ( n  = 512) included women with one previous cesarean, while the NVB group ( n  = 512) had no previous caesareans. All women used epidural analgesia. We assessed maternal and neonatal complications using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0., Results: The VBAC group had an 87.5% success rate for vaginal birth under epidural analgesia, whereas the NVB group had a 100% success rate. A primary focus of the study was uterine rupture. Vaginal birth after cesarean was associated with a higher incidence of uterine rupture (0.8% vs 0%, p  = 0.031), postpartum hemorrhage (6.6% vs 3.5%, p  = 0.021) and the need for blood transfusions (2.7% vs 0.8%, p  = 0.012) compared with NVB. There were no substantial differences in maternal infections, wound infections or perineal lacerations between the groups. Although neonatal outcomes were generally similar, the VBAC group experienced higher rates of 5-minute Apgar scores <7 (2.3% vs 0.6%, p  = 0.009) and admissions to neonatal intensive care units (3.1% vs 1.2%, p  = 0.016 Even after adjusting for confounders, VBAC remained an independent risk factor for several complications., Conclusion: Although VBAC is feasible and mostly safe, it is associated with a higher risk of specific complications compared with NVB. Careful selection of candidates and close monitoring are essential for optimizing outcomes in VBAC cases.

Objective: To estimate the incidence of uterine rupture in the Netherlands and evaluate risk indicators prelabour and during labor of women with adverse maternal and/or perinatal outcome., Methods: This is a population-based nationwide study using the Netherlands Obstetrics Surveillance System (NethOSS). We performed a two-year registration of pregnant women with uterine rupture. The first year of registration included both women with complete uterine rupture and women with incomplete (peritoneum intact) uterine rupture. The second year of registration included women with uterine rupture with adverse maternal and/or perinatal outcome. We collected maternal and obstetric characteristics, clinical signs, and symptoms during labor and CTG abnormalities. The main outcome measures were incidence of complete uterine rupture and uterine rupture with adverse outcome and adverse outcome defined as major obstetric hemorrhage, hysterectomy, embolization, perinatal asphyxia and/or (neonatal) intensive care unit admission., Results: We registered 41 women with a complete uterine rupture (incidence: 2.5 per 10,000 births) and 35 women with uterine rupture with adverse outcome (incidence: 0.9 per 10,000 births). No adverse outcomes were found among women with incomplete uterine rupture. Risk indicators for adverse outcome included previous cesarean section, higher maternal age, gestational age <37 weeks, augmentation of labor, migration background from Sub-Saharan Africa or Asia. Compared to women with uterine rupture without adverse outcomes, women with adverse outcome more often expressed warning symptoms during labor such as abdominal pain (OR 3.34, 95%CI 1.26-8.90) and CTG abnormalities (OR 9.94, 95%CI 2.17-45.65). These symptoms were present most often 20 to 60 min prior to birth., Conclusion: Uterine rupture is a rare condition for which several risk indicators were identified. Maternal symptoms and CTG abnormalities are associated with adverse outcomes and time dependent. Further analysis could provide guidance to expedite delivery.

Objective: Cesarean section (CS) rates have been on the rise globally, leading to an increasing number of women facing the decision between a Trial of Labor after two Cesarean Sections (TOLAC-2) or opting for an Elective Repeat Cesarean Section (ERCS). This study evaluates and compares safety outcomes of TOLAC and ERCS in women with a history of two previous CS deliveries., Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for studies published until 30 June 2023. Eligible studies were included based on predetermined criteria, and a random-effects model was employed to pool data for maternal and neonatal outcomes., Results: Thirteen studies with a combined sample size of 101,011 women who had two prior CS were included. TOLAC-2 was associated with significantly higher maternal mortality (odds ratio (OR)=1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 1.25-1.81) and higher chance of uterine rupture (OR = 7.15, 95% CI = 3.44-14.87) compared to ERCS. However, no correlation was found for other maternal outcomes, including blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or post-partum hemorrhage. Furthermore, neonatal outcomes, such as Apgar scores, NICU admissions, and neonatal mortality, were comparable in the TOLAC-2 and ERCS groups., Conclusion: Our findings suggest an increased risk of uterine rupture and maternal mortality with TOLAC-2, emphasizing the need for personalized risk assessment and shared decision-making by healthcare professionals. Additional studies are needed to refine our understanding of these outcomes in the context of TOLAC-2.

Objective:  Following the release of A Randomized Trial of Induction versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE) trial, the induction of labor at 39 weeks has increased in the United States. The risk of uterine rupture and optimal timing of elective induction in those patients with a prior cesarean delivery is not well-described, and they were not included in the original trial. We aimed to determine the risk of uterine rupture in those patients undergoing elective induction of labor with prior cesarean delivery., Study Design:  This was a retrospective cohort of participants with prior cesarean delivery from 1996 to 2000. Participants were included if they had two or more prior cesareans. Participants were excluded if they had a history of an unknown prior incision, a classical incision, gestational age <39 weeks, any diabetes, chronic hypertension, twin gestation, collagen or vascular disease, or HIV. Those undergoing expectant management were compared with those undergoing elective induction with no medical or obstetrical indications for delivery. Analysis was performed at three gestational age groups: 39 weeks, 40 weeks, and 41 weeks. The primary outcomes were uterine rupture, rates of successful vaginal delivery, and a composite major morbidity risk. Multivariable logistic regression was performed., Results:  At 39 weeks, 618 (10.3%) elective inductions were compared with 5,365 (89.7%) undergoing expectant management; uterine rupture occurred more frequently (13 patients [2.1%] vs. 49 patients [0.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.6) with fewer successful vaginal birth after cesarean [VBAC; 66.8 vs. 75%; aOR, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.7]. The risk of uterine rupture was similar between groups at 40 weeks (5 patients [0.8%] vs. 21 patients [1.2%]; p  = 0.387) and 41 weeks (7 patients [1.4%] vs. 2 patients (0.8%); p  = 0.448)., Conclusion:  Patients undergoing elective induction of labor with a prior cesarean scar had an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with expectant management at 39 weeks, with fewer successful VBAC., Key Points: · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has an increased risk of uterine rupture.. · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has a less successful chance of vaginal delivery.. · Awaiting spontaneous labor in this cohort does not increase the risk of uterine rupture.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a hereditary connective tissue disorder associated with an elevated risk of vascular, uterine and digestive complications. Managing pregnancy in this context can be a challenge., Objectives: To systematically review the literature data on the complications in pregnancy associated with vEDS., Search Strategy: We searched the Pubmed Medline and Embase databases for articles using the following terms "vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome" or "vEDS" AND "pregnancy"., Selection Criteria: Women with vEDS., Data Collection and Analysis: We searched the PubMed® MEDLINE® database for publications evaluating obstetric outcomes in women with vEDS., Main Results: A total of 121 publications were screened, with six (accounting for 412 pregnancies) included in our review. Of the women included in this sample, 30% were infertile. The miscarriage rate was 13.8% (57/412) and 8.8% of the live births were premature. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries occurred in 11.3% (23/203) of the deliveries. The maternal mortality rate per pregnancy was 5.7%., Conclusions: Women with vEDS present an elevated risk of uterine rupture, vascular events, digestive events and death during pregnancy. Women appear to be most at risk during the peripartum period; to avoid expulsive efforts, a caesarean section should be scheduled at 37 weeks of gestation., (© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Maternal morbidity and mortality have long been among the world's most challenging health issues. Uterine rupture is one of the peripartum complications that kills almost one in every thirteen mothers. However, there is limited evidence on uterine rupture trends, proportions, and determinants. Thus, this study assessed the trend, prevalence, and associated factors of uterine rupture at Nekemte Specialized Hospital, Oromia Regional State, Western Ethiopia. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 2661 clients selected using a systematic random selection technique among the data collected for the project between January 2014 and December 2022 at Nekemte Specialized Hospital. Data were collected through an interview-administered questionnaire and card review from March 2023 to August 2023. The collected data were checked, coded, and entered into Epi info version 7.2 and then exported to SPSS Version 27 for analysis. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify the factors of uterine rupture. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% Confidence Interval was estimated to measure the strength of the association, and statistical significance was declared at a p-value less than 0.05. The trend of uterine rupture declined from 1.54% in 2014 to 0.93% in 2022. The overall prevalence was 3.53% (95%CI: 2.7%, 4.3%). Low household income (Adjusted OR = 3.75, 95%CI: 1.97, 7.13), grandmultiparity (Adjusted OR = 7.78, 95%CI: 4.70, 12.88), having a history of obstetrics complications such as prolonged labor (Adjusted OR = 3.78, 95%CI:2.11, 6.75), a history of cesarean section (Adjusted OR = 2.49, 95%CI:1.42, 4.35), and history of uterine repair (Adjusted OR = 18.01, 95%CI: 6.81, 47.64) were significantly associated with uterine rupture. This finding showed that the trend is declining, and the proportion of uterine rupture is still higher. A more vigilant approach to increase access to lower-income mothers, prevent prolonged and obstructed labor, and maintain antenatal care with complete packages and a referral system are issues to be addressed to minimize the chance of uterine rupture among women., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The increasing number of women of childbearing age with gynecological uterine scars presents a significant clinical challenge. -Planning the route of birth for a subsequent pregnancy necessitates -careful consideration and should be the subject of an informed -discussion. Unfortunately, the heterogeneity of data in the literature with regards to gynecological uterine scars makes this choice -debatable. Although the use of less invasive surgical procedures in this context is on the rise, there is currently a lack of robust data on their obstetric repercussions. This article -explores risk factors for uterine rupture in the view of gynecological uterine scars and -provides pragmatic recommendations for clinicians., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Introduction: Vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, but the rising rate of uterine rupture calls into question the safety of this practice., Aim: To identify risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture., Methods: This was a prospective, analytical and descriptive observational study, carried out in a tertiary care maternity. We included all parturients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. We assessed the quality of the uterine scar which was evaluated after delivery., Results: We included 300 patients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. The trial of labor was successful (vaginal delivery) in 50.7% of cases. The uterine scar, assessed after delivery, was of good quality in 79% of cases. We noted 7 cases of uterine rupture, i.e. 2.3% of cases, and dehiscence in 56 patients, i.e. 18.6% of cases. Parity, conditions of previous caesarean section (programmed or emergency) and interpregnancy interval were significantly related to the labor outcome (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.135 respectively). The occurrence of rupture or dehiscence was not significantly related to macrosomia, defined as a neonatal weight greater than 4000g (p=0.135)., Conclusion: Knowing the risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture would enable the obstetrician to properly assess the situation in order to make the correct decision and avoid neonatal and maternal complications.

Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a complication of placenta percreta. We present the case of a woman in her early 30s with a history of incomplete abortion treated by dilatation and curettage who was admitted with abdominal pain and vomiting at 30 weeks of gestation. She was diagnosed with thrombophilia and was administered anticoagulant drugs. After 10 hours of monitoring, the patient abruptly deteriorated. An emergency cesarean delivery showed a ruptured uterus due to placenta percreta. She accepted localized excision and uterine repair, and recovered well. Rupture of an unscarred uterus due to placental percreta is an extremely rare obstetric complication with high maternal and fetal mortality. This condition should be suspected in all pregnant women who have severe abdominal pain without being in labor. The treatment of uterine rupture due to placental percreta should be individualized, and repair of the uterus is possible in the majority of women., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Background: Most German hospitals do not offer a trial of labour after two caesarean sections (TOLA2C). TOLA2C is claimed to be associated with too many complications, above all the high risk of uterine rupture. The objective of this study is to review our experience with TOLA2C, with special attention paid to the risk and probability of uterine ruptures. Secondary outcomes include comparing neonatal and maternal outcomes in the group of TOLA2C with the group of elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and to assess the success rate for vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)., Methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted in a community hospital in North Rhine-Westphalia. Inclusion criteria were all pregnant women with two caesarean sections in their medical history, with a current vertex singleton pregnancy and the absence of morphological abnormalities of the foetus, who gave birth in our facility between January 2015 and June 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Fishers exact tests, Chi 2 -tests and t-tests for independent samples were performed., Results: A total of 91 cases were included in the TOLA2C-group. These were compared to 99 cases that, within the same time frame, had an elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS-group). There was no statistically significant difference found in the neonatal outcome between the two groups (except for the neonatal pH-value: p 0.024). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TOLA2C-group, while maternal complication rates were almost similar (13.2% in the TOLA2C-Group, vs. 16.2% in the ERCS-Group). The success rate for TOLA2C was 55%. No complete uterine rupture was found, but in three cases an incomplete rupture (3.3% rate for incomplete uterine ruptures) occurred, but had no influence on the neonatal outcome., Conclusion: TOLA2C is not associated with a worse maternal or neonatal outcome compared to ERCS, and especially the risk of complete uterine ruptures seems to be low. TOLA2C should be more widely offered to suitable patients who are motivated for it., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the case of placenta previa-accreta when the placenta covers the entire anterior uterine wall, it is difficult to avoid transecting the placenta by traditional low-transverse cesarean section (CS), resulting in catastrophic hemorrhage and fetal anemia. To prevent this critical risk, we developed the CS with transverse uterine fundal incision (TUFI) and this technique has been widely used as a beneficial surgical method in clinical practice owing to its safety advantages for the mother and neonate since our first report. However, the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy remains unclear. Based on our 17 years of experience, patients who require TUFI do not need to avoid this beneficial operative method simply because of their desire to conceive again, as long as certain conditions can be met. To approve a post-TUFI pregnancy, an appropriate suture method, delay in conception for at least 12 months with evaluation of the TUFI scar, and cautious postoperative management are at a minimum essential. In this article, we showed our recommendation for operative procedure and discuss the current status of the management of post-TUFI pregnancies based on the evaluation of the TUFI wound scar and experience with postoperative pregnancies., (© 2024 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: The rising rate of cesarean deliveries has led to an increased incidence of long long-term complications, including niche formation in the uterine scar. Niche development is associated with various gynecologic complaints and complications in subsequent pregnancies, such as uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Although uterine closure technique is considered a potential risk factor for niche development, consensus on the optimal technique remains elusive., Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of single-layer vs double-layer closure of the uterine incision on live birth rate at a 3-year follow-up with secondary objectives focusing on gynecologic, fertility, and obstetrical outcomes at the same follow-up., Study Design: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed at 32 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women ≥18 years old undergoing a first cesarean delivery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either single-layer or double-layer closure of the uterine incision. The primary outcome of the long-term follow-up was the live birth rate; with secondary outcomes, including pregnancy rate, the need for fertility treatment, mode of delivery, and obstetrical and gynecologic complications. This trial is registered on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform www.who.int (NTR5480; trial finished)., Results: Between 2016 and 2018, the 2Close study randomly assigned 2292 women, with 830 of 1144 and 818 of 1148 responding to the 3-year questionnaire in the single-layer and double-layer closure. No differences were observed in live birth rates; also there were no differences in pregnancy rate, need for fertility treatments, mode of delivery, or uterine ruptures in subsequent pregnancies. High rates of gynecologic symptoms, including spotting (30%-32%), dysmenorrhea (47%-49%), and sexual dysfunction (Female Sexual Function Index score, 23) are reported in both groups., Conclusion: The study did not demonstrate the superiority of double-layer closure over single-layer closure in terms of reproductive outcomes after a first cesarean delivery. This challenges the current recommendation favoring double-layer closure, and we propose that surgeons can choose their preferred technique. Furthermore, the high risk of gynecologic symptoms after a cesarean delivery should be discussed with patients., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify risk factors for developing early postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and to examine whether risk factors vary according to severity and mode of delivery., Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted in which all deliveries at a tertiary medical center were included. Risk factors for developing early PPH were compared based on the severity of bleeding as well as the mode of delivery. Multiple logistic regression models were used to control for confounders., Results: Among 322 497 deliveries included in the analysis, early PPH complicated 1811 (0.56%) of all deliveries. Among all cases of early PPH, 505 deliveries (28%) were complicated with severe PPH. Using a logistic regression model, in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy, previous cesarean delivery (CD), pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, and uterine rupture were independently associated only with severe early PPH, while non-progressive second stage of labor, induction of labor, and large for gestational age were independently associated with both severe and mild early PPH. When applying an additional logistic regression model, whereas IVF pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, and large for gestational age were independently associated with early PPH among vaginal deliveries only, placenta previa was independently associated with early PPH among CD only., Conclusions: Independent risk factors for developing severe PPH solely include IVF pregnancy, previous CD, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, and uterine rupture. IVF pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, and large for gestational age are independent risk factors for early PPH following vaginal delivery, while placenta previa is independently associated with early PPH after CD only. Due to the recognition of the importance of both the provider and institutional planning and preparation for PPH, the study's results should be viewed within the scope of its retrospective cohort design., (© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objective: To determine whether thermal ballon endometrial ablation can be safely performed after one or more cesarean sections., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study including all women who underwent thermal balloon endometrial ablation at the Kepler University Hospital, Austria, between November 2017 and December 2022. For the analysis of the study endpoints, the dataset was divided into two groups: women with at least one cesarean section, and women without a history of cesarean section. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Association was tested using Fisher's exact test., Results: Of the 361 women included, 29.3 % (n = 105) had at least one previous cesarean section. The association between intraoperative uterine rupture and previous cesarean section was not statistically significant (0 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.292). Only one uterine rupture was observed in the cesarean section group, which was located at the uterine fundus after a preoperatively unknown previous uterine perforation during IUD insertion. Secondary endpoints (overall complication rate, postoperative endometritis, vesicouterine fistula, different grades of Clavien-Dindo-classification) showed no significant associations either, even when considering the number of previous cesarean sections. The readmission rate to the clinic for bleeding disorders was 11.4 % in both groups (p = 1.00)., Conclusion: Women who have had one or more prior cesarean sections with transverse isthmocervical hysterotomy do not appear to have an increased risk of complications in a subsequent thermal balloon endometrial ablation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fetal death has various causes, among the most common are problems relating to the placenta, such as placental abruption or placental malformations such as placenta accreta. From the literature, it emerges that placental analysis at autopsy can allow for greater resolution of cases compared to clinical history and external examination of the fetus alone., Case Report: We report the case of a woman at the eleventh week of pregnancy who died in hospital. The medical history revealed two further previous pregnancies, both with births by cesarean section. The autopsy identified the cause of maternal death as acute cardiorespiratory arrest secondary to hemorrhagic shock from spontaneous uterine rupture. Hemorrhagic infiltrate was found in the intervillous placental spaces with rupture of the uterus due to placenta previa and accreta., Discussion: Placenta accreta is a condition in which a pathological adherence and/or invasion of the myometrium by the placenta is observed. This condition poses a problem during recovery with potential for severe bleeding. Therefore, we emphasize the macroscopic and histological analysis of the placenta, uterus and the ovaries in all cases of maternal-fetal death, suggesting however that the organs be analyzed both by gross analysis and after permanence in formaldehyde. Furthermore, in these cases, it is important to evaluate the clinical history and data, especially ultrasound scans performed in life, or insertion anomalies during instrumental investigations. For this reason, we recommend to collaborate with a multidisciplinary team in these cases, including the gynecologist and the forensic pathologist.

Objective: To analyze the incidence, indications, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of postpartum hemorrhage resulting in peripartum hysterectomy (PH)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with postpartum hemorrhage requiring surgical procedures at ≥ 28 weeks of gestation from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. The patients were divided into a PH group and a non-PH group. Maternal clinical characteristics, the management of postpartum hemorrhage, pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlations between risk factors and PH., Results: The incidence of hysterectomy was 0.2/1000 deliveries (31/150194). The variables significantly associated with PH were placenta previa with placenta increta/percreta (OR36.26), uterine rupture (OR266.16) and an estimated blood loss ≥ 3513 mL (OR431.11). The proportion of cases involving hemorrhagic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, bladder injury, neonatal severe asphyxia, neonatal death and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy were significantly higher in the PH group (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The most common indications of PH were placental pathology. Efforts should be made to reduce the rate of cesarean deliveries and uterine curettage to lower the probability of abnormal placental invasion and appropriate medical indications for trial of labor after cesarean should be strictly followed to avoid the risk of uterine rupture., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To explore the obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcome in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with an accidental uterine extension (AUE) during cesarean delivery (CD), as well as the relationship between the different types of AUE (inferior, lateral and superior)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all CD with AUE in a tertiary medical center between 01/2011-01/2022. Women with a prior CD with AUE were compared to a 1:3 ratio matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE. All AUE were defined in their direction, size and mode of suturing. CD with deliberate uterine extensions were excluded. We evaluated obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with AUE during CD., Results: Comparing women with a prior CD with AUE (n=177) to the matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE (n=528), we found no significant differences in proportions of uterine rupture or any other major complication or adverse outcome between the groups. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy in relation to the characteristics of the AUE (direction, size and mode of suturing)., Conclusions: Subsequent pregnancies after AUE are not associated with higher maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes including higher proportions of uterine rupture compared to pregnancies without previous AUE. Different characteristics of the AUE do not impact the outcome., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Purpose: We hypothesized that among obese patients with a history of cesarean birth, a TOLAC is associated with decreased composite maternal adverse outcomes (CMAO) compared to planned repeat low transverse cesarean section (RLTCS)., Methods: In this population-based cross-sectional study using the National Birth Certificate database from 2016 to 2020, we compared obese patients who attempted TOLAC at term (≥ 37 weeks estimated gestational age) to planned RLTCS. The primary outcome was a CMAO, defined as delivery complications, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, or maternal blood transfusion., Results: Overall, 794,278 patients met inclusion criteria for the study; 126,809 underwent a TOLAC, and 667,469 had a planned RLTCS. The overall CMAO was significantly higher for patients undergoing TOLAC (9.0 per 1000 live births) compared to RLTCS (5.3 per 1000 live births; aRR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.75)., Conclusion: This data demonstrate that in obese patients with prior cesarean birth, a trial of labor is associated with increased maternal morbidity when compared to a planned repeat cesarean birth., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Abstract: Developmental anomalies of genital tract result from defective fusion and absorption of various parts of Mullerian ducts in fetal life. Rudimentary horn pregnancy (RHP) is a rare occurrence of one in 76,000 and one in 160,000. We present a case of a 24-year-old primigravida with ruptured RHP initially managed in the line of an intrauterine pregnancy with severe anemia. Hemodynamic instability made us suspect ruptured RHP and lifesaving laparotomy was performed for the same. A 1.5-liter hemoperitoneum was encountered with a right RHP. Multiple adhesions were present with necrotic tissue adherent and clumped together as tubo-ovarian mass. Resection of rudimentary horn was performed. We report this case to emphasize the need to consider rare uterine anomalies as a possibility in patients presenting with acute abdomen in early pregnancy. So, Obstetricians can consider these rare entities in differential diagnosis and management.

Purpose: To determine maternal outcomes and risk factors for composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture during pregnancy., Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all women diagnosed with uterine rupture during pregnancy, between 2011 and 2023, at a single-center. Patients with partial uterine rupture or dehiscence were excluded. We compared women who had composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture to those without. Composite maternal morbidity was defined as any of the following: maternal death; hysterectomy; severe postpartum hemorrhage; disseminated intravascular coagulation; injury to adjacent organs; admission to the intensive care unit; or the need for relaparotomy. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture. The secondary outcome was the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications following uterine rupture., Results: During the study period, 147,037 women delivered. Of them, 120 were diagnosed with uterine rupture. Among these, 44 (36.7%) had composite maternal morbidity. There were no cases of maternal death and two cases of neonatal death (1.7%); packed cell transfusion was the major contributor to maternal morbidity [occurring in 36 patients (30%)]. Patients with composite maternal morbidity, compared to those without, were characterized by: increased maternal age (34.7 vs. 32.8 years, p = 0.03); lower gestational age at delivery (35 + 5 vs. 38 + 1 weeks, p = 0.01); a higher rate of unscarred uteri (22.7% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01); and rupture occurring outside the lower uterine segment (52.3% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Uterine rupture entails increased risk for several adverse maternal outcomes, though possibly more favorable than previously described. Numerous risk factors for composite maternal morbidity following rupture exist and should be carefully assessed in these patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) with a macrosomic neonate is associated with adverse outcomes., Study Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a population motivated for TOLAC. Women attempting TOLAC with a neonatal birth weight >4,000 g were compared with women attempting TOLAC with neonatal birth weights between 3,500 and 4,000 g. The primary outcome was TOLAC success. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), shoulder dystocia, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), Apgar's score <7 at 5 minutes, and umbilical artery pH <7.1. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test., Results: Overall, 375 women who underwent TOLAC with a neonate weighing >4,000 g comprised the study group. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-three women attempting TOLAC with a neonate weighing 3,500 to 4,000 g comprised the control group. There were no clinically significant differences between the groups for maternal age, gestational age, parity, and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rate. There were no significant differences in the rates of successful TOLAC (94 vs. 92.3%, p  = 0.2, odds ratio [OR] = 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5, 1.2), operative vaginal delivery (7.4 vs. 5.3%, p  = 0.18, OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.1), uterine rupture (0.4 vs. 0%, p  = 0.6), PPH (3.2 vs. 2.3%, p  = 0.36, OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7, 2.7), OASI (0.8 vs. 0.2%, p  = 0.1, OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.6), Apgar's score <7 at 5 minutes (0 vs. 0.4%, p  = 0.37), and umbilical artery pH <7.1 (0.5 vs. 0.7%, p  = 1.0, OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.2, 3.2). Women with a neonate weighing >4,000 g had a significantly increased risk of shoulder dystocia (4 vs. 0.4%, p  < 0.05, OR = 9.2 95% CI: 3.9, 22) CONCLUSION:  Women attempting TOLAC with a macrosomic neonate are not at increased risk for failed TOLAC, operative vaginal delivery, uterine rupture, PPH, or OASI but are at risk of shoulder dystocia. This information may aid in prenatal counseling for women considering TOLAC with a macrosomic fetus., Key Points: · TOLAC with fetal macrosomia does not increase the risk of uterine rupture.. · TOLAC with fetal macrosomia is associated with high chances of VBAC.. · TOLAC with fetal macrosomia is not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Uterine rupture in pregnant women can lead to serious adverse outcomes. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with complete uterine rupture., Methods: Data from 33 cases of surgically confirmed complete uterine rupture at Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively., Results: In total, 31,555 pregnant women delivered in our hospital during the study period. Of these, approximately 1‰ (n = 33) had complete uterine rupture. The average gestational age at complete uterine rupture was 31 +4  weeks (13 +1 -40 +3  weeks), and the average bleeding volume was 1896.97 ml (200-6000 ml). Twenty-six patients (78.79%) had undergone more than two deliveries. Twenty-five women (75.76%) experienced uterine rupture after a cesarean section, two (6.06%) after fallopian tube surgery, one (3.03%) after laparoscopic cervical cerclage, and one (3.03%) after wedge resection of the uterine horn, and Fifteen women (45.45%) presented with uterine rupture at the original cesarean section incision scar. Thirteen patients (39.39%) were transferred to our hospital after their initial diagnosis. Seven patients (21.21%) had no obvious symptoms, and only four patients (12.12%) had typical persistent lower abdominal pain. There were 13 cases (39.39%, including eight cases ≥ 28 weeks old) of fetal death in utero and two cases (6.06%, both full term) of severe neonatal asphyxia. The rates of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy were 66.67%, 63.64%, and 21.21%. Maternal death occurred in one case (3.03%)., Conclusions: The site of the uterine rupture was random, and was often located at the weakest point of the uterus. There is no effective means for detecting or predicting the weakest point of the uterus. Rapid recognition is key to the treatment of uterine rupture., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To estimate short- and long-term maternal complications in relation to planned mode of term breech delivery in first pregnancy., Design: Register-based cohort study., Setting: Denmark., Population: Nulliparous women with singleton breech delivery at term between 1991 and 2018 (n = 30,778)., Methods: We used data from the Danish national health registries to identify nulliparous women with singleton breech presentation at term and their subsequent pregnancies. We performed logistic regression to compare the risks of maternal complications by planned mode of delivery. All data were proceeded and statistical analyses were performed in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA)., Main Outcome Measures: Postpartum hemorrhage, operative complications, puerperal infections in first pregnancy and uterine rupture, placenta previa, post-partum hemorrhage, hysterectomy and stillbirth in the subsequent two pregnancies., Results: We identified 19,187 with planned cesarean and 9,681 with planned vaginal breech delivery of which 2,970 (30.7%) delivered vaginally. Planned cesarean significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infections (2.4% vs 3.9% adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.54 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.66) and surgical organ lesions (0.06% vs 0.1%; (aOR): 0.29 95% CI 0.11-0.76) compared to planned vaginal breech delivery. Planned cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher risk of uterine rupture in the subsequent pregnancies but not with risk of postpartum hemorrhage, placenta previa, hysterectomy, or stillbirth., Conclusion: Compared to planned vaginal breech delivery at term, nulliparous women with planned cesarean breech delivery have a significantly reduced risk of postoperative complications but a higher risk of uterine rupture in their subsequent pregnancies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Caning et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: To determine perinatal outcomes following uterine rupture during a trial of labor after one previous cesarean delivery (CD) at term., Methods: A retrospective single-center study examining perinatal outcomes in women with term singleton pregnancies with one prior CD, who underwent a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and were diagnosed with uterine rupture, between 2011 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite maternal outcome, and the secondary outcome was a composite neonatal outcome. Additionally, we compared perinatal outcomes between patients receiving oxytocin during labor with those who did not., Results: Overall, 6873 women attempted a TOLAC, and 116 were diagnosed with uterine rupture. Among them, 63 (54.3%) met the inclusion criteria, and 18 (28%) had the maternal composite outcome, with no cases of maternal death. Sixteen cases (25.4%) had the composite neonatal outcome, with one case (1.6%) of perinatal death. No differences were noted between women receiving oxytocin and those not receiving oxytocin in the rates of maternal composite (35.7% vs 26.5%, P = 0.502, respectively) or neonatal composite outcomes (21.4% vs 26.5%, P = 0.699)., Conclusion: Uterine rupture during a TOLAC entails increased risk for myriad adverse outcomes for the mother and neonate, though possibly more favorable than previously described. Oxytocin use does not affect these risks., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objective: To assess whether, after induction of labor with prostaglandin, multiparous (≥2 para) women have an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with nulliparous or uniparous women., Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including women who underwent induction with prostaglandin in all maternity wards in Sweden between May 1996 and December 2019 (n = 56 784). The study cohort was obtained by using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, which contains information from maternity and delivery records. The main outcome measure was uterine rupture., Results: Overall, multiparous women induced with prostaglandin had an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with nulliparous women (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.33 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-8.04]; P < 0.007). Multiparous women with no previous cesarean section (CS) induced with prostaglandin had more than three times higher risk of uterine rupture (crude OR, 3.55 [95% Cl, 1.48-8.53]; P = 0.005) compared with nulliparous women and four times higher risk compared with uniparous women (OR, 4.10 [95% CI, 1.12-15.00]; P < 0.033). Multiparous women with previous CS had a decreased risk of uterine rupture compared with uniparous women with one previous CS (crude OR, 0.41 [95% Cl, 0.21-0.78]; P = 0.007)., Conclusion: Our study implies that multiparity in women with no previous CS is a risk factor for uterine rupture when induced with prostaglandin. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the appropriate method of induction., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between a topical hemostatic agent used at the time of cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC)., Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy in whom a topical hemostatic agent was placed during the primary cesarean delivery were compared with patients in whom no such agent was placed. We assessed the uterine scar disruption rate after the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcomes. Univariate analyses were followed by multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 95% confidence interval [CI])., Results: During the study period, 7199 women underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study; 430 (6.0%) had prior use of a hemostatic agent, 6769 (94.0%) did not. In univariate analysis, a history of topical hemostatic agent use was not found to be significantly associated with uterine scar rupture, dehiscence, or failed trial of labor. This was also confirmed on multivariate analysis for uterine rupture (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 0.66-5.54; P = 0.23), dehiscence of uterine scar (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 0.56-4.68; P = 0.37), and TOLAC failure (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48; P = 0.61)., Conclusion: A history of hemostatic agent use is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption after subsequent TOLAC. Further prospective studies in other settings are needed to strengthen these findings., (© 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Rationale: Uterine rupture is an obstetrical emergency associated with severe maternal and fetal mortality. It is rare in the unscarred uterus of a primipara., Patient Concerns: A 25-year-old woman in her 38th week of gestation presented with slight abdominal pain of sudden onset 10 hours before. An emergency cesarean section was done. After surgery, the patient and the infant survived., Diagnoses: With slight abdominal pain of clinical signs, ultrasound examination showed that the amniotic sac was found in the peritoneal cavity with a rupture of the uterine fundus., Interventions: Uterine repair and right salpingectomy., Outcomes: After surgery, the patient and the infant survived. The newborn weighed 2600 g and had an Apgar score of 10 points per minute. Forty-two days after delivery, the uterus recovered well., Lessons: Spontaneous uterine rupture should be considered in patients even without acute pain, regardless of gestational age, and pregnancy with abdominal cystic mass should consider the possibility of uterine rupture., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Rationale: Uterine rupture is extremely hazardous to both mothers and infants. Diagnosing silent uterine rupture in pregnant women without uterine contractions is challenging due to the presence of nonspecific symptoms, signs, and laboratory indicators. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the elevated risks associated with silent uterine rupture., Patient Concerns: on admission, case 1 was at 37 gestational weeks, having undergo laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage 8 months prior to the in vitro fertilization embryo transfer procedure, case 2 was at 38 4/7 gestational weeks with a history of 5 previous artificial abortion and 2 previous vaginal deliveries, case 3 was at 37 6/7 gestational weeks with a history of laparoscopic myomectomy., Diagnoses: The diagnosis of silent uterine rupture was based on clinical findings from cesarean delivery or laparoscopic exploration., Interventions: Case 1 underwent emergent cesarean delivery, revealing a 0.25 cm × 0.25 cm narrow concave area above the Ring Ties with active and bright amniotic fluid flowing from the tear. Case 2 underwent vaginal delivery, and on the 12th postpartum day, ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5.8 cm × 3.3 cm × 2.3 cm lesion on the lower left posterior wall of the uterus, and 15th postpartum day, laparoscopic exploration confirmed the presence of an old rupture of uterus. Case 3 underwent elective cesarean delivery, revealing a 3.0 cm × 2.0 cm uterine rupture without active bleeding at the bottom of the uterus., Outcomes: The volumes of antenatal bleeding for the 3 patients were approximately 500 mL, 320 mL, and 400 mL, respectively. After silent uterine ruptures were detected, the uterine tear was routinely repaired. No maternal or neonatal complications were reported., Lessons: Obstetricians should give particular consideration to the risk factors for silent uterine rupture, including a history of uterine surgery, such as laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage, laparoscopic myomectomy, and induced abortion., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Rationale: Uterine rupture during pregnancy poses significant risks to both the fetus and the mother, resulting in high mortality and morbidity rates. While awareness of uterine rupture prevention after a cesarean section has increased, insufficient attention has been given to cases caused by pregnancy following hysteroscopy surgery., Patient Concerns: We report 2 cases here, both of whom had a history of hysteroscopy surgery and presented with severe abdominal pain during pregnancy., Diagnoses: Both patients had small uterine ruptures, with no significant abnormalities detected on ultrasonography. The diagnosis was confirmed by a CT scan, which showed hemoperitoneum., Interventions: We performed emergency surgeries for the 2 cases., Outcomes: We repaired the uterus in 2 patients during the operation. Both patients recovered well. The children survived. No abnormalities were detected during their follow-up visits., Lessons: Attention should be paid to the cases of pregnancy after hysteroscopy., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Uterine rupture is a life-threatening obstetric complication. The purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiological features, maternal and foetal prognosis and different treatment options for uterine rupture in healthy and scarred uteri. We conducted a retrospective monocentric descriptive and analytical study of 60 cases of uterine rupture collected in the Department of Gynaecology-Obstetrics of the Center of Maternity and Neonatology, Monastir, from 2017 to 2021. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of a uterine scar. Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. The majority of cases of rupture occurred in patients with scarred uterus (n=55). The most common clinical sign was abnormal foetal heart rate. No maternal deaths were recorded and perinatal mortality rate was 11%. Mean BMI, fetal macrosomia rate and mean parity were significantly higher in the healthy uterus group than in the scarred uterus group (p=0.033, 0.018, and 0.013, respectively). The maternal complications studied (post-partum haemorrhage, hysterectomy, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalisation) were significantly more frequent in patients with unscarred uterine rupture (p=0.039; p=0.032; p=0.009; p=0.025 respectively). Uterine rupture is a life-threatening obstetrical event for the foetus and the mother. Fetal heart rate abnormality is the most common sign associated with uterine rupture. Management is based on conservative treatment in most cases. Patients with scarred uterus have a better prognosis., Competing Interests: Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d'intérêts., (Copyright: Imen Ben Farhat et al.)

Background: The increasing global incidence of cesarean section has prompted efforts to reduce cesarean delivery rates. A trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) has emerged as an alternative to elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) for women with a prior cesarean delivery. However, the available evidence on the comparative outcomes of these 2 options remains inconsistent, primarily due to varying advantages and risks associated with each. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the maternal-neonatal results in TOLAC and ERCD in women with prior cesarean deliveries., Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library databases up to September,2022 to identity studies evaluating perinatal outcomes in women who underwent TOLAC compared to ERCD following a previous cesarean delivery. The included studies were subjected to meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software to assess the overall findings., Results: A total of 13 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Statistically significant differences were identified in the rate of uterine rupture (OR = 2.01,95%CI = 1.48-2.74, P < .00001) and APGAR score < 7 at 5 minutes (OR = 2.17,95%CI = 1.69-2.77, P < .00001) between the TOLAC and ERCD groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the rates of hysterectomy, maternal blood transfusion, postpartum infection, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal intensive care unit (P ≥ .05) admission between the 2 groups., Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that TOLAC is associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture and lower incidence APGAR score < 7 at 5 minutes compared to ERCD. It is vital to consider predictive factors when determining the appropriate mode of delivery in order to ensure optimal pregnancy outcomes. Efforts should be made to identify the underlying causes of adverse outcomes and implement safety precautions to select suitable participants and create safe environments for TOLAC., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

This article's emphasis is on the holistic care of women who are assessed as suitable for and amenable to vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) in the South African state health sector context. It is beyond its scope to deal with the minutiae of VBAC conduct, operative conduct of repeat Caesarean section (CS), or management of uterine rupture. It is also beyond the scope of the article to reflect on practices, which are accepted in other healthcare contexts. The intention is not to promote VBAC over elective repeat CS, but rather to assist healthcare workers with providing high-quality holistic care. The goal is that women with previous CS are given access to the mode of delivery, which is safest for them and their fetus, while minimising adverse psychological effects of previous and future negative birth experiences.

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatments and fertility recovery of rudimentary horn pregnancy (RHP). Methods: The clinical data of 12 cases with RHP diagnosed and treated in Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical informations, diagnosis and treatments of RHP and the pregnancy status after surgery were analyzed. Results: The median age of 12 RHP patients was 29 years (range: 24-37 years). Eight cases of pregnancy in residual horn of uterus occurred in type Ⅰ residual horn of uterus, 4 cases occurred in type Ⅱ residual horn of uterus; among which 5 cases were misdiagnosed by ultrasound before surgery. All patients underwent excision of residual horn of uterus and affected salpingectomy. After surgery, 9 patients expected future pregnancy, and 3 cases of natural pregnancy, 2 cases of successful pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology. Four pregnancies resulted in live birth with cesarean section, and 1 case resulted in spontaneous abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. No uterine rupture or ectopic pregnancy occurred in subsequent pregnancies. Conclusions: Ultrasonography could aid early diagnosis of RHP while misdiagnosis occurred in certain cases. Thus, a comprehensive judgment and decision ought to be made based on medical history, physical examination and assisted examination. Surgical exploration is necessary for diagnosis and treatment of RHP. For infertile patients, assisted reproductive technology should be applied when necessary. Caution to prevent the occurrence of pregnancy complications such as uterine rupture, and application of cesarean section to terminate pregnancy are recommended.

Background: Uterine rupture is a rare complication that can occur in the first trimester of pregnancy. It can lead to serious maternal morbidity or mortality, which is mostly due to catastrophic bleeding. First trimester uterine rupture is rare; hence, diagnosis can be challenging as it may be confused with other causes of early pregnancy bleeding such as an ectopic pregnancy. We present a case of first trimester scar dehiscence and conduct a literature review of this rare condition., Case Presentation: A 39-year-old African patient with four previous hysterotomy scars presented with severe lower abdominal pain at 11 weeks of gestation. She had two previous histories of third trimester uterine rupture in previous pregnancies with subsequent hysterotomies and repair. She underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy that confirmed the diagnosis of a 10 cm anterior wall uterine rupture. A laparotomy and repair of the rupture was subsequently done., Conclusion: In conclusion, the case presented adds to the body of evidence of uterine scar dehiscence in the first trimester. The risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, and management outlined may help in early identification and management of this rare but life threatening condition., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Women with a previous caesarean delivery face a difficult choice in their next pregnancy: planning another caesarean or attempting vaginal delivery, both of which are associated with potential maternal and perinatal complications. This trial aimed to assess whether a multifaceted intervention, which promoted person-centred decision making and best practices, would reduce the risk of major perinatal morbidity among women with one previous caesarean delivery., Methods: We conducted an open, multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled trial of a multifaceted 2-year intervention in 40 hospitals in Quebec among women with one previous caesarean delivery, in which hospitals were the units of randomisation and women the units of analysis. Randomisation was stratified according to level of care, using blocked randomisation. Hospitals were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (implementation of best practices and provision of tools that aimed to support decision making about mode of delivery, including an estimation of the probability of vaginal delivery and an ultrasound estimation of the risk of uterine rupture), or the control group (no intervention). The primary outcome was a composite risk of major perinatal morbidity. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN15346559., Findings: 21 281 eligible women delivered during the study period, from April 1, 2016 to Dec 13, 2019 (10 514 in the intervention group and 10 767 in the control group). None were lost to follow-up. There was a significant reduction in the rate of major perinatal morbidity from the baseline period to the intervention period in the intervention group as compared with the control group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for incremental change over time, 0·72 [95% CI 0·52-0·99]; p=0·042; adjusted risk difference -1·2% [95% CI -2·0 to -0·1]). Major maternal morbidity was significantly reduced in the intervention group as compared with the control group (adjusted OR 0·54 [95% CI 0·33-0·89]; p=0·016). Minor perinatal and maternal morbidity, caesarean delivery, and uterine rupture rates did not differ significantly between groups., Interpretation: A multifaceted intervention supporting women in their choice of mode of delivery and promoting best practices resulted in a significant reduction in rates of major perinatal and maternal morbidity, without an increase in the rate of caesarean or uterine rupture., Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, MOP-142448)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report maternal and neonatal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in a series of women with a prior uterine rupture., Methods: The records of all 103,542 deliveries (22,286 by cesarean section) performed in a single tertiary medical center from 2009 to 2021 were reviewed. Women with a prior uterine rupture, defined as a separation of the entire thickness of the uterine wall, with extrusion of fetal parts and intra-amniotic contents into the peritoneal cavity documented in the operative report of the previous cesarean delivery or laparotomy, were identified for inclusion in the study., Results: The cohort included 38 women with 50 pregnancies (50 neonates). Women had been scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at early term. Mean gestational age at delivery was 36 + 4 weeks (±5 days). In 7 pregnancies (14 %), spontaneous labor occurred before the scheduled cesarean delivery (at 36 + 6, 35 + 4, 35 + 3, 34 + 6, 34 + 3, 32 + 6 and 31 + 0 gestational weeks). A recurrent uterine scar rupture was found in 4 pregnancies (8 %), and uterine scar dehiscence, in 2 pregnancies (4 %), all identified during elective repeat cesarean delivery. In none of these cases was there a clinical suspicion beforehand; all had good maternal and neonatal outcomes. One parturient with placenta previa-accreta had a planned cesarean hysterectomy., Conclusion: Women with prior uterine rupture have good maternal and neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies when managed at a tertiary medical center, with planned elective term cesarean delivery, or even earlier, at the onset of spontaneous preterm labor., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Uterine rupture is a rare obstetric emergency that is typically associated with the presence of scar tissue such as in the case of previous caesarean section. In this case report, a primigravid patient presented to the hospital in cardiac arrest with massive haemoperitoneum secondary to a posterior uterine rupture. The histological specimen was found to have diffuse adenomyosis at the site of rupture. On review of the literature, there is insufficient evidence to suggest we as clinicians should alter the antenatal care for patients with known adenomyosis; however, this case highlights how we should have a high index of suspicion for those presenting with signs and symptoms of uterine rupture with known adenomyosis in the absence of other risk factors., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rationale: Uterine rupture (UR) during pregnancy is a serious obstetric complication. Here we report a case of spontaneous rupture in an unscarred uterus at 13 weeks of gestation after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, which is not common in past references. Our focus is to understand the relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and UR., Patient Concerns: A 33-year-old infertile woman with a history of SLE became pregnant after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. She presented with sudden mental fatigue and dyspnea, accompanied by sweating, dizziness and lower abdominal pain at 13 weeks of gestation., Diagnoses: Blood analysis revealed anemia. Ultrasonography and plain computed tomography scan revealed intrauterine early pregnancy with effusion in pelvic and abdominal cavity. Laparotomy confirmed the diagnosis of UR., Interventions: The patient underwent emergency laparotomy. Upon surgery, multiple myometrium was weak with only serosal layer visible, and there was a 2.5 cm irregular breach with exposed placenta and villous tissue in the posterior wall of the uterus. After removing intrauterine fetus and repairing the breach, there was still persistent intraperitoneal hemorrhage. The patient underwent subtotal hysterectomy finally., Outcomes: Postoperative recovery was uneventful. The patient was discharged on the 8th day after operation., Lessons: Combined efforts of specialists from ultrasound, imaging and gynecologist led to the successful diagnosis and management of this patient. We should be cautious about the occurrence of unscarred uterus rupture during pregnancy of the women with the disease of SLE and long-term glucocorticoid treatment. In IVF, we had better transfer one embryo for these patients with the history of SLE. Obstetricians should strengthen labor tests to detect early signs of UR of the patients with SLE and long term glucocorticoid treatment. Once UR is suspected, prompt surgical treatment is needed as soon as possible., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: To clarify the reproductive outcomes of women who underwent abdominal repair surgery for cesarean scar defect (CSD)., Study Design: This is a retrospective observational study performed in a tertiary center. We retrospectively reviewed 20 women who underwent abdominal repair between 2007 and 2021. The indication for the repair was a minimal residual myometrial thickness (RMT) of ≦3.0 mm. We investigated surgical complications, changes in minimal RMT before and three-months after the repair, and reproductive outcomes., Results: The median age at the time of repair was 36 years (27-40), with a median body mass index of 21.0 (17.7-28.7) and a median of 1 prior cesarean section (1-5). Twelve women reported secondary infertility, while eight women were concerned about the potential risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies due to thin RMT. Additionally, one woman had a co-existing vesicouterine fistula, two had abscess and hematoma formation at the precedent cesarean section, and three showed remarkable dehiscence of the defect. The median minimal RMT significantly increased to 5.05 mm (range; 2.5-14.2 mm) after the repair. Seven women had a total of eight live births, with a median duration from the repair to a live-birth pregnancy of 11.5 months (range; 4-20 months). No surgical complications occurred during the repair, and there were no instances of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, one woman who became pregnant with twins following double blastocyst transfer required a cesarean section at 25 weeks of pregnancy due to bulging towards the bladder side of the repaired CSD., Conclusion: Abdominal repair for CSD is feasible in women with thin RMT who experience secondary infertility. Twin pregnancies can promote thinning of the CSD repair site, potentially increasing the risk of uterine rupture., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Parity is a prognostic variable when considering trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). This study aimed to determine whether grandmultiparous patients are at increased risk of poor TOLAC outcomes such as uterine rupture., Study Design: A retrospective cohort was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center with approximately 10,000 deliveries per year. The study group included women post one cesarean section who attempted TOLAC carrying a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We divided the cohort into three groups: group 1 - women who had a parity of 1; group 2 - parity of 2-4; group 3 - parity of 5 and above. The primary outcome was successful VBAC. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and combined maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, and paired t -test., Results: Five thousand four hundred and forty-seven women comprised the study group: group 1 - 879 patients, group 2 - 2374 patients, and group 3 - 2194 patients. No significant between-group differences were found in gestational age at delivery. Rates of a successful VBAC were 80.6%, 95.4%, and 95.5%, respectively. Group 1 were more likely to have a failed TOLAC compared to group 2 (OR 5.02, 95% CI 3.9-6.5, p <.001) and group 3 (OR 5.17, 95% CI 4.0-6.7, p <.001). There was no increased risk of failed TOLAC when comparing groups 2 and 3 (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p =.89). Operative delivery rate differed significantly between all three groups; 25.1%, 6.2%, and 3.6%, for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( p <.001). The rate of uterine rupture was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (1.02% vs. 0.29% p =.02) and group 3 (1.02% vs. 0.2%, p =.01, respectively). There were no differences between group 2 and group 3 (0.29% vs. 0.2% p =.78)., Conclusions: Grandmultiparity is not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture during TOLAC.

Objective: To assess the risk difference of uterine rupture when using current mifepristone and misoprostol regimens for second-trimester abortion among individuals with prior cesarean birth compared with those without prior cesarean birth., Data Sources: We searched the terms second trimester, induction, mifepristone, and abortion in PubMed, EMBASE, POPLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Library from inception until December 2022., Methods of Study Selection: We included randomized trials and observational studies including a mixed cohort, with and without uterine scar, of individuals at 14-28 weeks of gestation who used mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy or to manage a fetal death. We excluded case reports, narrative reviews, and studies not published in English. Two reviewers independently screened studies., Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Absolute risks with binomial CIs were calculated from pooled data. Using R software, we estimated total risk difference by the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method without continuity correction. For studies with zero events, a continuity correction of 0.5 was applied for individual risk differences and plotted graphically with forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I2 statistics. Funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Of 198 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria: seven randomized trials (n=923) and 15 observational studies (n=6,195). Uterine rupture risk with prior cesarean birth was 1.1% (10/874) (95% CI 0.6-2.1) and without prior cesarean birth was 0.01% (2/6,244) (95% CI 0.0-0.12). The risk difference was 1.23% (95% CI 0.46-2.00, I2 =0%). Of the 12 reported uterine ruptures, three resulted in hysterectomy., Conclusion: Uterine rupture with mifepristone and misoprostol use during second-trimester induction abortion is rare, with the risk increased to 1% in individuals with prior cesarean birth., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022302626., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)