Search

Aim. To assess the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for the treatment of mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (EC) in routine clinical practice in Russia.Materials and methods. This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included patients with recurrent and metastatic EC from 37 cancer centers in Russia treated between May 2020 and April 2023. Patients with histologically verified EC without microsatellite instability who received ≥1 course of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib therapy were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; the clinical characteristics of the patients were additionally analyzed, the objective response rate and the toxicity profile of therapy were assessed.Results. The study included 100 patients. Median age was 65 (30–83) years. The most common histologic tumor subtype was endometrioid adenocarcinoma (68 %); serous adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 22 % of cases, other types of tumor – 10 % of cases. All patients had pMMR/microsatellite-stable tumors. The median progression-free survival was 7.75 months (95 % confidence interval 0.7–33.8), and a partial response to therapy was observed in 24 % of patients. Almost half of the patients (44 %) required dose reduction due to adverse events. The most common adverse events included fatigue (n = 26; 26 %), hypertension (n = 20; 20 %), and hypothyroidism (n = 14; 14 %).Conclusion. This study confirms the clinical efficacy of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent and metastatic EC without mismatch repair system deficiency (pMMR-tumors) in routine clinical practice.

Objective: to compare the efficacy and toxicity of aflibercept and bevacizumab in combination with fOLfIRI in secondline therapy for patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. we performed a retrospective analysis of data on patients with metastatic colon cancer treated in 9 clinics in the Russian federation. The inclusion criteria were as follows: metastatic or locally advanced colon cancer; treatment with bevacizumab or aflibercept plus fOLfIRI in the second-line therapy. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PfS). Secondary outcome measures included objective response rate and incidence of adverse events.Results. A total of 271 patients with metastatic colon cancer who received second-line therapy with bevacizumab (n = 81) or aflibercept (n = 190) between 2014 and 2018 were selected for this study. Study groups were matched for main prognostic signs. The objective response rate was 18.1 % in the bevacizumab group and 20.5 % in the aflibercept group (p = 0.7). The median PfS was 5 months (95 % confidence interval 3.8–6.1) in the aflibercept group and 7 months (95 % confidence interval 0.81–2.1) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 1.4; 95 % confidence interval 0.99–2.1; p = 0.04). multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the type of the targeted drug independently had no effect on PfS (hazard ratio 1.3; 95 % confidence interval 0.9–1.9; p = 0.2). we observed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications of any grades between the groups (58 % vs 72 %, p = 0.1). Patients receiving aflibercept were more likely to develop grade III–Iv arterial hypertension (2 % vs 9.5 %) and diarrhea (0 % vs 5.4 %), whereas thrombotic complications were more common in the bevacizumab group (10 % vs 1.8 %).Conclusion. we observed no significant differences in objective response rate and PfS between patients with metastatic colon cancer receiving bevacizumab or aflibercept in combination with fOLfIRI as second-line therapy. The toxicity profiles were different. Our findings can be used for choosing an optimal targeted drug for second-line treatment.

Objective: to compare the efficacy and tolerability of second‑line chemotherapy with original bevacizumab (Avastin) and biosimilar bevacizumab produced by “Biocad” (Avegra) in patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. This retrospective observational study included patients with metastatic colon cancer treated in 9 clinics in the Russian Federation. Inclusion criteria were as follows: metastatic or locally advanced colon cancer and second‑line therapy with bevacizumab (Avastin or Avegra). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measures included progression‑free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and incidence of adverse events associated with antiangiogenic therapy.Results. We identified 209 patients with metastatic colon cancer who received second‑line therapy with biosimilar bevacizumab (n = 37; 17.7 %) or original bevacizumab (n = 90; 43 %) or no targeted therapy (n = 82; 39.3 %) between 2014 and 2018. Patients in these three groups were matched for their main prognostic characteristics. The DCR was 59.5 % in the group of biosimilar bevacizumab, 58.9 % in the group of original bevacizumab, and 50 % in the control group (without targeted therapy). PFS was 6 months in the chemotherapy group and 8 months in the groups of bevacizumab (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.91; p = 0.002); the difference in PFS between patients receiving biosimilar bevacizumab and original bevacizumab was insignificant (HR 1.3; 95 % CI 0.81–2.1; р = 0.3). Median OS was 16 months in the chemotherapy group, 30 months in the biosimilar bevacizumab group, and 20 months in the original bevacizumab group (HR 0.89; 95 % CI 0.72–1.1; р = 0.3). We observed a tendency to longer OS in patients receiving biosimilar bevacizumab (HR 0.44; 95 % CI 0.17–1.1; р = 0.08). Bevacizumab‑ associated toxicity was limited to arterial hypertension and was registered in 4 patients with only one patient who developed grade III hypertension.Conclusions. There was no significant difference in PFS between patients receiving biosimilar and original drug, while OS was higher in the group of biosimilar bevacizumab. Both medicines demonstrated similar toxicity. Therapy with biosimilar bevacizumab ensured lower incidence of hypertension and proteinuria compared to the original drug. An additional prospective observational study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of biosimilar bevacizumab in colon cancer patients is needed.

Introduction. Trifluridine/Tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is a new chemotherapeutic drug approved in more than 60 countries for use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have registered progression or intolerance to treatment with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, anti-VEGRand anti-EGFR-targeted agents. This study evaluated for the first time the effectiveness and tolerability of FTD/TPI therapy in the Russian patient population.Materials and methods. A confirmatory open-label single-arm non-randomized trial was conducted in 2 clinical centres in Russia. The main criteria for inclusion were: conduction of at least the 2nd line of standard systemic therapy for metastatic colon adenocarcinoma. The primary efficacy criteria were: 2-month progression-free survival; secondary – median progressionfree survival, disease control frequency, safety assessment, overall survival. Research number: NCT03274882.Results. A total of 26 patients were included in the study; the median age was 60.5 years (30 to 78); 19 (73%) women; and 4 patients with ECOG 0 and 22 – with ECOG 1. All patients were previously treated with the inclusion of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines, 21 (81%) – bevacizumab, 6 (23%) – anti-EGFR antibodies, and 2 (7.7%) – regorafenib. The median for treatment courses was 4 (1–21), 11 (42.3%) patients were treated for 6 months or more. The two-month progression-free survival rate was 52% with a median progreesion-free survival rate of 4 months (95% CI 1.8–7.4 months). The median of total survival rate was 11 months (95% CI 5,2–16,8 months). Disease control was achieved in 60%. Neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, anemia, weakness prevailed among undesirable events associated with treatment (≥5 patients). The majority of complications were of the 1st–2nd degree. Among the undesirable events of the 3rd–4th degree, neutropenia was more common, while in 3 patients febrile neutropenia of the 3rd degree was registered.Conclusions. In the Russian population of patients with colorectal chemorefractory cancer, the drug FTD/TPI (TAS-102) shows efficacy and tolerability comparable to the RECOURSE registration study.

Introduction. The randomized MPACT study showed that nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine results in statistically significantly longer life expectancy. The objective of this retrospective study is to obtain relevant data on the efficacy of this combination in real clinical practice in Russia. Materials and methods. The study included patients with morphologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, with a general condition assessed on the ECOG scale between 0-2, which received gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Immediate and long-term treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results. 142 patients, who received treatment from 2009 to 2019 in 17 centers from 11 regions of Russia, were included in the study. Assessment of the objective effect was made in 134 patients. Objective effects were detected in 34 (25.4%) cases. The median time-to-progression was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-7.4), the median length of life was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.6-17.9). An elevated CA19-9 level is the only independent adverse prognostic factor for progression-free survival (RR = 8.0, 95% CI 1.4 -43.8, p = 0.02) according to Cox multivariate regression analysis. The number of previously conducted chemotherapy lines (p = 0.34), ECOG status (p = 0.70), age over 70 years (p = 0.45), serious comorbidity (p = 0.97) did not have a statistically significant effect on progression-free survival. Findings. The gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combination has a relatively higher efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer. The immediate and long-term results of its use in real clinical practice in Russia are consistent with data obtained in the Western countries.

Objective: to identify factors associated with efficacy of an aflibercept-chemotherapy combination in patients with metastatic colon cancer.Materials and methods. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 20 clinics from 15 regions of the Russian Federation. The main efficacy outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to assess the impact of various factors of PFS.Results. Two hundred and fifty-seven patients received aflibercept-containing chemotherapy; of them, 175 participants (68.1 %) received it as a second-line therapy. The objective response rate and median PFS were 18.7% and 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2—5.8) respec -tively. The following factors were found to have a positive effect of PFS at multivariate analysis: grade I—II adverse events to aflibercept therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38—0.89; p = 0.01), therapy for concomitant diseases (HR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29—0.76; p = 0.002), and ECOG performance status of 0 (HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.34—0.81; p = 0.004). Patient with all 3 factors present had median PFS of 9 months, whereas patients without them demonstrated PFS of only 3 months (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.5—2.6; p

The article represents case studies on clinical experience of targeted therapy ribociclib in combination with letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in Russian Federation. Russian oncologists’ experience has demonstrated the high efficacy and manageable safety profile of the ribociclib treatment in patients in clinical practice.

The article shows the experience of eribulin application in actual clinical practice in Oncology institutions of the Russian Federation concerning metastatic breast cancer. We have analyzed the efficacy of the drug in case of different subtypes of the tumor and have chosen patients, depending on the location of metastases and with proven maximum efficacy of eribulin. We have shown the side reactions and the possibility of application of eribulin in combination with other antineoplastic agents.

The leading oncologists' meeting was held on February 7, 2014 in Moscow. Those in attendance discussed treatment approaches ofbreast cancer, and in particular, locally-advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Participants came to the conclusion that patients with breast cancer require long treatment by many different chemotherapeutic agents, including some newer ones available. There are no standard approaches to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer after antracyclines and taxanes. Eribulin is a new chemotherapeutic agent that resulted in overall survival improvement in patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer after antracyclines and taxanes. Eribulin is included in the recommendations of Russian oncological professional societies. It is diffcult to specify now a particular group of patients for the treatment of Eribulin so the experts came to conclusion that Eribulin is recommended to patients with metastatic breast cancer according to its prescription. Based on the previous, doctors concluded that it is necessary to increase provision of the breast cancer patients with chemotherapy agents, to include Eribulin in the privileged lists of medications and to use chemotherapeautic agents consistently as a monotherapy in accordance with the latest recommendations, also to legally approve standards of breast cancer treatment that have real clinical value based on the clinical recommendations from said professional societies. Varying practical questions relative to the safety and efficacy of Eribulin were raised during the doctors meeting.