Search

Individual Placement and Support (IPS), an evidence-based supported employment model for working-age adults with serious mental illness, also serves transition age adults (TAY; ages 16-24). The IPS-Y is a new IPS fidelity scale tailored to this younger population. Although adopted worldwide, it lacks research on the psychometric properties of its two components (employment and education). Six IPS programs serving TAY were assessed on IPS-Y (Employment) in an initial review (Time 1) and on both components in a second review one year later (Time 2). We examined scale calibration, reliability, and validity for the IPS-Y in this sample. Fidelity reviewers use the full range of ratings, from "not IPS" to "exemplary," on both IPS-Y components. On the employment component, item calibration was excellent; internal consistency reliability was good at Time 1 (r = .81) and test-retest reliability was fair (r = .63). The IPS-Y (Employment) showed excellent sensitivity to change, with the mean scale score increasing from 88.3 to 105.5. IPS-Y (Employment) item ratings at Time 2 were similar to corresponding items in a sample of conventional IPS programs using the standard IPS fidelity scale. Predictive validity was promising for both components, with fidelity scale ratings positively correlated with site-level competitive employment rates (r = .57) and education enrollment rates (r = .69). IPS can be implemented to good fidelity for programs serving TAY. Preliminary findings regarding the psychometric properties of the IPS-Y Employment are encouraging, but replication in larger samples is needed., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Individual placement and support (IPS), an evidence-based supported employment (SE) program, has helped Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration to obtain work. To facilitate integration of IPS into SCI rehabilitation, resources are needed. A scoping review was conducted to identify tools and resources suitable for providers of SCI care., Methods: Applying a modified version of Arksey and O'Malley's framework, a scoping review of literature on SE tools or resources was conducted. The original review focused on resources published between 2002 and 2015 and available in English. Prior to publication an updated review through 2017 was conducted., Results: From 1822 tools and resources identified in the initial review, 24 met criteria for inclusion and were evaluated by an advisory panel of experts, who selected 16 tools that addressed five topics: IPS in SCI (n = 2) orientation to SCI (n = 3); IPS SE (n = 7), job accommodations (n = 2), and benefits planning (n = 2). The updated review yielded no tools or resources that met inclusion criteria., Conclusion: Despite few resources to guide implementation of IPS in SCI, 16 essential resources were identified that, combined into a toolkit, may facilitate translation of IPS in SCI from research to clinical care. Implications for rehabilitation The toolkit consists of 16 essential resources and is currently available online to all persons involved in spinal cord injury rehabilitation to educate them about this effective means of assisting persons with spinal cord injury to find employment and to facilitate translation of individual placement and support in spinal cord injury from research to clinical care. While expert-informed, the toolkit is being field tested with both clinical and vocational providers to facilitate the adoption of individual placement and support by spinal cord injury rehabilitation programs. The revised version will be made available online.