Search

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology’s Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient’s perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring.In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants.The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term “lines of therapy” no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset. Resumen: El último documento de consenso del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) data del año 2016. Aunque muchas consideraciones continúan todavía vigentes, desde entonces se han producido significativos cambios en el manejo y tratamiento de esta enfermedad motivados no sólo por la aprobación de nuevos fármacos con diferentes mecanismos de acción, sino también por la evolución de conceptos otrora consolidados. Esto ha permitido abordar situaciones especiales como el embarazo y la vacunación desde otra perspectiva e incluir nuevas variables en la toma de decisiones en práctica clínica, como plantear tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (TME) de alta eficacia en fases tempranas, considerar la perspectiva del paciente y utilizar nuevas tecnologías como monitorización remota.Estos cambios han motivado la presente actualización del consenso mediante metodología Delphi, con el objetivo de reflejar el nuevo paradigma de manejo del paciente con EM basándose en la evidencia científica y experiencia clínica de los participantes.Entre las principales conclusiones destacan como recomendaciones: iniciar TME inmunomodulador en el síndrome radiológico aislado con actividad radiológica persistente, evaluar la perspectiva del paciente y abandonar la terminología “líneas de tratamiento” en la clasificación de los TME (consenso mayor del 90%). Tras el diagnóstico de EM, la elección del primer TME debería considerar la presencia/ausencia de factores de mal pronóstico (epidemiológicos, clínicos, radiológicos y biomarcadores) para la aparición de nuevos brotes o progresión de discapacidad, pudiendo plantear desde el inicio TME de alta eficacia.

Resumen: El último documento de consenso del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) data del año 2016. Aunque muchas consideraciones continúan todavía vigentes, desde entonces se han producido cambios significativos en el manejo y tratamiento de esta enfermedad, motivados no solo por la aprobación de nuevos fármacos con diferentes mecanismos de acción, sino también por la evolución de conceptos otrora consolidados. Esto ha permitido abordar situaciones especiales como el embarazo y la vacunación desde otra perspectiva, e incluir nuevas variables en la toma de decisiones en práctica clínica, como plantear tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (TME) de alta eficacia en fases tempranas, considerar la perspectiva del paciente y utilizar nuevas tecnologías como monitorización remota.Estos cambios han motivado la presente actualización del consenso mediante metodología Delphi, con el objetivo de reflejar el nuevo paradigma de manejo del paciente con EM basándose en la evidencia científica y la experiencia clínica de los participantes.Entre las principales conclusiones destacan como recomendaciones: iniciar TME inmunomodulador en el síndrome radiológico aislado con actividad radiológica persistente, evaluar la perspectiva del paciente y abandonar la terminología «líneas de tratamiento» en la clasificación de los TME (consenso mayor del 90%). Tras el diagnóstico de EM la elección del primer TME debería considerar la presencia/ausencia de factores de mal pronóstico (epidemiológicos, clínicos, radiológicos y biomarcadores) para la aparición de nuevos brotes o progresión de discapacidad, pudiendo plantear desde el inicio TME de alta eficacia. Abstract: The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring.In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants.The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term “lines of therapy” no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset.

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system involving astrocytes, B lymphocytes, anti-aquaporin 4, and such inflammatory mediators as interleukin-6. Several immunosuppressants are used in their treatment. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, may be a treatment option. Method: We performed an observational, retrospective study analysing parameters of effectiveness (annualised relapse rate, disability, and radiological progression) and safety of tocilizumab in patients with NMOSD in whom previous immunosuppressant treatment had failed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in clinical practice in patients with NMOSD not responding to other immunosuppressants. Results: Five patients with NMOSD were analysed. Sixty percent of patients were women; mean age at diagnosis was 50 ± 5.3 years and mean progression time was 4.5 ± 3.6 years. Previously administered immunosuppressants were rituximab (in all 5), cyclophosphamide (2), and azathioprine (1). Mean time of exposure to tocilizumab was 2.3 ± 1 years. Mean annualised relapse rate was 1.8 ± 1.3 in the year prior to the introduction of tocilizumab and 0.2 ± 0.4 the year after (P

Introduction and objective: Teriflunomide is an oral immunomodulatory agent approved for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We examined teriflunomide outcomes in patients with RRMS under clinical practice conditions in Spain. Material and methods: Non-interventional, retrospective study at 15 sites in the Autonomous Region of Madrid and nearby regions. Effectiveness (relapses, EDSS, gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions and new/enlarged T2-weighted lesions), safety (adverse events), and reasons for discontinuation during the 24 months after teriflunomide initiation were reported. Results: A total of 776 patients were included (mean [SD] age was 43.3 (9.8) years; 69.3% were female). Two-thirds (67.7%) of patients had received a prior treatment, with beta-interferons or glatiramer acetate (BRACE) as the most frequent (93.5%) treatment. After 24 months, teriflunomide significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) by 72% (mean [95% confidence interval] 0.12 [0.10, 0.14] vs 0.43 [0.40, 0.47] at baseline; P

ObjectiveTo describe the profile of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with fingolimod in Spain and to assess the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod after 4 years of inclusion in the Spanish Gilenya Registry.MethodsAn observational, retrospective/prospective, multicenter case registry, including all patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) starting treatment with fingolimod in 43 centers in Spain. Analyses were performed in the overall population and in subgroups according to prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT): glatiramer acetate/interferon beta-1 (BRACE), natalizumab, other treatment, or naïve.ResultsSix hundred and sixty-six evaluable patients were included (91.1% previously treated with at least one DMT). The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) prior to fingolimod was 1.12, and the mean EDSS at fingolimod initiation was 3.03. Fingolimod reduced the ARR by 71.4%, 75%, 75.5%, and 80.3%, after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively (pConclusionsThe patient profile was similar to other observational studies. The results obtained from the long-term use of fingolimod showed that it was effective, regardless of prior DMT, and it had adequate safety results, with a positive benefit-risk balance.

Objective: To ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response., Methods: Multicenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity., Results: After a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients., Conclusion: Ocrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA., Competing Interests: FR-J received research grants and travel support for speaking engagements from Janssen, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Merck. JG-G received research support, compensation for participating on advisory boards, lecture fees, and/or travel support from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme‐Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. EF received research support, compensation for participating on advisory boards, speaking fees, and/or funding for travel from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme‐Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, and Roche. VM-L received consulting and speaking fees from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Terumo, Sanofi, Teva, and Bristol Myers Squibb. CD-P received funding for training and scientific meetings from Sanofi, Merck, Novartis and Roche. SS received research grants, travel support or honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. AQ is funded by a grant from the Fundación Francisco Soria y Melguizo and has received funding from Merck, Novartis, and Horizon Therapeutics to attend conferences. LR-T received compensation for consulting services and speaking fees from Biogen, Novartis, Bayer, Merck, Sanofi, Genzyme, Roche, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, TEVA, and Horizon. SM-Y received honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for collaborations as consultant and scientific communications and also received research support as well as funding for travel and congress expenses from Roche, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall, and Bristol Myers Squibb. EM received research grants, travel support, or honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibbb, Biogen, Janssen, and Novartis. AL-R received speaker and consultation fees from Biogen, Janssen, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi, and congress travel support from Roche. LBo received research grants and travel support from Merck, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Horizon and Bristol Myer Squibb. JC-G received speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi, Bayer, Janssen, BMS, and Bial. FB received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Bristol Myer Squibb, Genzyme, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva. MM-G received compensation for consulting services and speaking fees from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, BMS, Janssen, Roche, Horizon, and Viatris. JG-D received honoraria as speaker, advisor and researcher from Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi. MM-M received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Novartis, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche. JM-L received honoraria as a consultant, lecturer in meetings and has participated in clinical trials and other research projects promoted by Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Neuraxpharm, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. LC-F received speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Celgene, Ipsen, Biopas, Almirall. LV received research grants and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, and Novartis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Rodríguez-Jorge, Fernández-Velasco, Villarrubia, Gracia-Gil, Fernández, Meca-Lallana, Díaz-Pérez, Sainz de la Maza, Pacheco, Quiroga, Ramió-Torrentà, Martínez-Yélamos, Bau, Monreal, López-Real, Rodero-Romero, Borrega, Díaz, Eguía, Espiño, Chico-García, Barrero, Martínez-Ginés, García-Domínguez, De la Fuente, Moreno, Sainz-Amo, Mañé-Martínez, Caminero, Castellanos, Gómez López, Labiano-Fontcuberta, Ayuso, Abreu, Hernández, Meca-Lallana, Martín-Aguilar, Muriel García, Masjuan, Costa-Frossard and Villar.)

Introduction: Environmental factors appear to play an important role in the development and course of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Seasonal variability in disease activity has been described and it is postulated that it may vary according to geographical area. The aim of this study is to analyse the monthly distribution of activity observed on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to look for a possible relationship with climate in patients with relapsing remitting MS., Material and Methods: Retrospective observational study, carried out in the population of one hospital on the Spanish Mediterranean coast. A total of 238 MRI scans of 51 patients were evaluated. Climatological data were obtained from the Spanish State Meteorological Agency from 2012 to 2016. Activity was defined as contrast-enhancing lesions., Results: The distribution of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was found to be non-uniform across months (p = 0.008). Visual inspection suggests higher activity in July and August. Regarding weather, tropical nights (defined as days with a minimum temperature above 20 °C) were associated with increased risk of MRI activity (OR = 1.06, p = 0.001)., Conclusion: These findings suggest a non-uniform monthly distribution of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and an association between warmer nights and increased MRI activity, pointing to a potential impact of environmental factors on multiple sclerosis activity in neuroimaging., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Current literature and a real-world study suggest that diroximel fumarate (DRF) is safer than dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, no real-world study to date has significantly addressed the efficacy of this treatment., Objectives: This study aims to elucidate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DRF in a real-world setting, utilizing data from a Spanish national registry of patients commencing DRF therapy post-market introduction., Methods: In this multicenter, prospective observational study, data were collected from MS patients who initiated DRF treatment. The study monitored demographic and clinical characteristics, safety outcomes (including adverse events, reasons for discontinuation, and lymphocyte counts), and efficacy outcomes (radiological and clinical activity)., Results: A total of 195 MS patients across 26 neurological departments were included, predominantly female (79.5%), with a mean age of 42.17 years, and a mean duration of treatment with DRF of 6.3 months. Most patients (70.3%) reported no adverse events, while gastrointestinal issues and flushing were the most common adverse events observed. The majority of patients (84.6%) continued with DRF treatment, with tolerability issues being the primary reason for discontinuation. Efficacy analysis showed low relapse rates post-DRF initiation, with most patients exhibiting stable or improved Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and radiological assessments demonstrating minimal activity., Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the real-world application of DRF, confirming its safety and tolerability while offering preliminary evidence of its efficacy in managing MS., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Content Ed Net (Madrid, Spain) with funding from Biogen. Conflict of interest C.A. has received lecture honoraria, consultancy fees, and travel expenses from Biogen, Bristol Mayers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Roche. A.A.T. has received fees as a speaker, consultant or travel support from Biogen, Almirall, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz and Janssen. E.A. has no disclosures for financial affiliation, financial support nor grants moneys and has disclosure for speaker honorarium from Novartis, Merck and Biogen. JM.G.D. has received compensation as a consultant, researcher, or speaker from Biogen, Sanofi, Roche, Zenas Biopharma, Almirall, Novartis, Merck, Bristol-Myers-Squidd, and Johnson & Johnson. PM-E has received speaker and consultation fees from Allergan, Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck, Merz, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. V.G.Q has no conflict of interest related to this work. L.C.F. has received lecture honoraria, consultancy fees, clinical research funding, and travel expenses from Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Mayers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Neuraxpharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche. C.O.G. has received speaker and consultation fees from Alexion, Biogen Idec, BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. V.R.G. has received fees as a speaker, consultant or travel support from Almirall, Merck, Alexion, Roche and Sanofi. AB.C.R. has received honoraria as speaker/meeting moderator/courses/symposium organized by Almirall Prodesfarma S.A, Biogen Idec Inc, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceutical; Merck-Serono, Mylan, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals; and for congress assistance from Biogen Idec Inc, Bial, Merck-Serono, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals. J.R. has received speaking/consulting fees and/or travel funding from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Biogen, Novartis, BMS, Jannsen and Teva. O.S. has received fees from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Alter, Bial, Teva, Neuraxfarma, Esteve, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. L.F. has no conflict of interest related to this work. F.P.P has no conflict of interest related to this work. A.A.R. has received fees as a speaker and advisor, and funding for attendance at congresses and other medical meetings, from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. J.A.L. received consultant fees from Merck. F.I. has received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursement from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche Spain, and Genzyme-Sanofi. V.C.R has no conflict of interest related to this work. AJ.C.V. has no conflict of interest related to this work. L.B. has no conflict of interest related to this work. V.G. has received speaker fees from Merck, Roche, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi. L.A.R.A. declares to have received travel aid and financial compensation for talks from BMS and Novartis. R.G.R received payments from Biogen for participating in training conferences. AT.C.O. has received payments from Biogen for participating in training conferences for other professionals. JL.S.M. accepted travel compensation from Novartis, Merck and Biogen, speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Almirall, Bayer and Teva and has participated in clinical trials by Biogen, Sanofi, Merck and Roche. D.P.R. has received honoraria as a speaker, funding to attend courses and conferences, and consultancies and research grants from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche and Almirall. F.G.M has received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursement from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche Spain, and Genzyme-Sanofi. L.H.E. has received speaker and consultation fees from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi. Ethics approval The research protocol received approval from the independent ethics committee at the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (10 November 2022, acta CEIM 5723). Consent to participate This investigation adhered to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and complied with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). All personal identifiers were excluded from the findings. Consent for publication Not applicable. Data availability statement Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Author contributions CAH and VML made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. All authors contributed to the acquisition of data and revised the manuscript and approved the version to be published. Code availability Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) management have shifted perspectives on treatment strategies, advocating for the early initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs). This perspective review discusses the rationale, benefits, and challenges associated with early heDMT initiation, reflecting on the obsolescence of the traditional "first-line" and "second-line" treatment classifications. The article emerges from the last update of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of MS. During its development, there was a recognized need to further discuss the concept of treatment lines and the early use of heDMTs. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggests that early heDMT initiation leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced relapse rates, slowed disease progression, and decreased radiological activity, especially in younger patients or those in early disease stages. Despite the historical belief that heDMTs involve more risks and adverse events compared to moderate-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs), some studies have reported comparable safety profiles between early heDMTs and meDMTs, though long-term safety data are still lacking. The review also addresses the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, and preferences, explores the importance of therapeutic inertia, and highlights the evolving landscape of international and national guidelines that increasingly advocate for early intensive treatment approaches. The article also addresses the challenges of ensuring access to these therapies and the importance of further research to establish long-term safety and effectiveness of DMTs in MS., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Background: The assessment of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) concentration in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a useful tool for predicting clinical outcomes and assessing treatment response. However, its use in clinical practice is still limited. We aimed to assess how measurement of sNfL influences neurologists' treatment decisions in MS., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based study in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Neurology. Neurologists involved in MS care were presented with different simulated case scenarios of patients experiencing either their first demyelinating MS event or a relapsing-remitting MS. The primary outcome was therapeutic inertia (TI), defined as the absence of treatment initiation or intensification despite elevated sNfL levels. Nine cases were included to estimate the TI score (range 0-9, where higher values represented a higher degree of TI)., Results: A total of 116 participants were studied. Mean age (standard deviation-SD) was 41.9 (10.1) years, 53.4 % male. Seventy-eight (67.2 %) were neurologists fully dedicated to the care of demyelinating disorders. Mean (SD) TI score was 3.65 (1.01). Overall, 92.2 % of participants (n = 107) presented TI in at least 2/9 case scenarios. The lack of full dedication to MS care (p = 0.014), preference for taking risks (p = 0.008), and low willingness to adopt evidence-based innovations (p = 0.009) were associated with higher TI scores in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounders., Conclusion: TI was a common phenomenon among neurologists managing MS patients when faced with the decision to initiate or escalate treatment based on elevated sNfL levels. Identifying factors associated with this phenomenon may help optimize treatment decisions in MS care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Gustavo Saposnik received consulting fees from Roche Farma Spain and is supported by the University of Toronto Scientific Merit award. He also receives a modest stipend from the World Stroke Organization as the Editor in Chief of the World Stroke Academy. Enric Monreal reported receiving research grants, travel support, or honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibbb, Biogen, Janssen, and Novartis. Jose M García-Domínguez received honoraria as speaker, advisor and researcher from Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi. Jose E Meca-Lallana received honoraria as a consultant, chairman and lecturer in meetings and participated in clinical trials and other research projects promoted by Alexion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. Lamberto Landete received honoraria for participating in advisory boards and scientific and educational activities from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, UCB, Roche, and Teva. Virginia Meca-Lallana received consulting and speaking fees from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Terumo, Sanofi, Teva, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Luis Querol received speaker honoraria from Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Biogen, Grifols and CSL Behring; provided expert testimony for Grifols, Johnson & Johnson, Annexon Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Novartis, Takeda, and CSL-Behring; and received research funds from Roche, UCB, and Grifols. Eduardo Agüera received speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, and Biogen. Sergio Martínez-Yélamos received honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for collaborations as consultant and scientific communications; they also received research support as well as funding for travel and congress expenses from Roche, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Luisa M Villar reported receiving research grants and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, and Novartis. Ana B Caminero received courses and honoraria for her participation as speaker/meeting moderator/symposia organizer from Alter, Almirall, Bayer, Bial, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB; and support to attend scientific meetings from Biogen, Bial, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. Rocío Gómez-Ballesteros, Elisa Salas, Nicolas Medrano, Elena García-Arcelay, and Jorge Maurino are employees of Roche Farma Spain., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: People with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS) experience increasing disability, which impacts negatively on their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aims were to assess the impact of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) on functional status and HRQoL and describe the clinical profile in this population., Methods: DISCOVER is an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study with retrospective data collection in real-world clinical practice in Spain. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, functional and cognitive scales, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and direct healthcare, and non-healthcare and indirect costs were collected., Results: A total of 297 evaluable pwSPMS with a EDSS score between 3-6.5 participated: 62.3 % were female and 18.9 % had active SPMS. At the study visit, 77 % of them presented an Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS) of 6-6.5. Nearly 40 % did not receive any disease-modifying treatment. Regarding the working situation, 61.6 % were inactive due to disability. PROs: 99.3 % showed mobility impairment in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and about 60 % reported physical impact on the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29. Fatigue was present in 76.1 %, and almost 40 % reported anxiety or depression. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test was used to assess cognitive impairment; 80 % of the patients were below the mean score. Participants who presented relapses two years before and had high EDSS scores had a more negative impact on HRQoL. PwSPMS with a negative impact on HRQoL presented a higher cost burden, primarily due to indirect costs., Conclusions: PwSPMS experience a negative impact on their HRQoL, with a high physical impact, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and a high burden of indirect costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Standardizing health outcomes is challenging in clinical management, but it also holds the potential for creating a healthcare system that is both more effective and efficient. The aim of the present study is to define a standardized set of health outcomes for managing Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods: The project was led and coordinated by a multidisciplinary scientific committee (SC), which included a literature review, a patient-focused group, three nominal group meetings, and two SC meetings., Results: 36 outcome variables were included in the standard set: 24 clinical (including weight, smoking habit, comorbidities, disability, mobility, diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapsed-related variables, radiological variables, cognitive status and disease-related symptoms), nine treatment-related (pharmacological and non-pharmacological information), and 3 related to the impact of RRMS on the patient's life (quality of life, pregnancy desire, work-related difficulties). In addition, experts also agreed to collect 10 case-mix variables that may affect but cannot be controlled as part of the management of the condition: 4 sociodemographic (age, sex, race, and employment status) and 6 clinical (height, date of diagnosis and first episode, serological status, early symptoms, and number of relapses pre-diagnosis)., Conclusion: The information provided through the present standard set of outcome variables can improve the management of RRMS and promote patient-centred quality care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MLG has received fees from the following pharmaceutical companies for his participation in advisory groups, talks, workshops, seminars, conferences, studies or clinical trials: Bayer, Biogen, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merk and Janssen. PCR has served as a speaker for several pharmaceutical companies. ODS reports fees as a study investigator with Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. MB declares relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche and Biogen. ARA has participated in scientific consultancies and has been a speaker at scientific meetings organized by Merk, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva and Bristol Myers Squibb. AMB has no conflicts of interest to disclose. NBR declares relationships with Roche, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Janssen and Bristol Myers Squibb. AR serves on scientific advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Synthetic MR, Tensor Medical, Roche, Biogen, and OLEA Medical and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Biogen. AR is also a member of the editorial boards of Neurology and Neuroradiology and the executive committee of MAGNIMS. VML has not declared conflicts of interest. LBP and MC are employees of Outcomes 10, an independent research entity that has received fees from Bristol Myers Squibb for conducting this research. DV and AE are employees and may be shareholders of Bristol Myers Squibb. CO-G has received speaker and consultation fees from Alexion, Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Alemtuzumab is a high-efficacy treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Although clinical trials and observational studies are consistent in showing its efficacy and manageable safety profile, further studies under clinical practice conditions are needed to further support its clinical use., Objective: The aim of this observational retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab to add to the current real-world evidence on the drug., Methods: A cohort of 115 adult patients with RRMS treated with alemtuzumab between 2014 and 2020 was retrospectively followed up in five centers in Spain. Analysis included annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI), radiological activity, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3), and safety signals. Given the different follow-up periods among participants, ARR was calculated using the person-years method. CDI was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point decrease in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 2.0 confirmed 6 months apart. CDW was defined as a ≥ 1.0-point increase in EDSS score assessed in patients with a baseline EDSS score ≥ 1.0 (≥ 1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0), confirmed 6 months apart., Results: ARR decreased from 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.60-2.33) in the year prior to alemtuzumab initiation to 0.28 (0.17-0.37) after 1 year of treatment (87% reduction), and to 0.22 (0.13-0.35) after the second year. Over the entire follow-up period, ARR was 0.24 (0.18-0.30). At year 1, 75% of patients showed no signs of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and 70% at year 5. One percent of patients experienced 6-month CDW at year 1, 2.6% at year 2, 7.4% at year 3, and no patients over years 4 and 5. A total of 7.7% of patients achieved 6-month CDI in year 1, 3.6% in year 2, and maintained it at years 3 and 4. Most patients achieved annual NEDA-3: year 1, 72%; year 2, 79%; year 3, 80%; year 4, 89%; year 5, 75%. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 95% of patients and infections in 74%. Thyroid disorders occurred in 30% of patients, and only three patients developed immune thrombocytopenia. No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported., Conclusions: This study shows that alemtuzumab reduced the relapse rate and disability worsening in real-world clinical practice, with many patients achieving and sustaining NEDA-3 over time. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was consistent with previous findings, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed. As this was an observational and retrospective study, the main limitation of not having all variables comprehensively available for all patients should be considered when interpreting results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

We analyzed immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by measuring specific IgG titers and T-cell reactivity to different SARS-CoV-2 peptides in multiple sclerosis patients taking different disease-modifying treatments. Of the 88 patients included, 72 developed any kind of immune response after vaccination. Although DMTs such as fingolimod and anti-CD20+ treatments prevented patients from developing a robust humoral response to the vaccine, most of them were still able to develop a cellular response, which could be crucial for long-term immunity. It is probably advisable that all MS patients take additional/booster doses to increase their humoral and/or cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2., Competing Interests: L.E-P., N.R., F.S-M, and A.A. declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: On 4 and 5 November 2022, Madrid hosted the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, where neurologists specialised in multiple sclerosis outlined the latest developments presented at the 2022 ECTRIMS Congress, held in Amsterdam from 26 to 28 October., Aim: To synthesise the content presented at the 15th edition of the Post-ECTRIMS Meeting, in an article broken down into two parts., Development: This second part describes the new developments in terms of therapeutic strategies for escalation and de-escalation of disease-modifying therapies (DMT), when and in whom to initiate or switch to highly effective DMT, the definition of therapeutic failure, the possibility of treating radiologically isolated syndrome and the future of personalised treatment and precision medicine. It also considers the efficacy and safety of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, different approaches in clinical trial design and outcome measures to assess DMT in progressive stages, challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment, and treatment in special situations (pregnancy, comorbidity and the elderly). In addition, results from some of the latest studies with oral cladribine and evobrutinib presented at ECTRIMS 2022 are shown.

Introduction: A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of natalizumab has been recently authorised for multiple sclerosis patients. This study aimed to assess the implications of the new SC formulation, and to compare the annual treatment costs of SC versus intravenous (IV) natalizumab therapy from both the Spanish healthcare system (direct health cost) and the patient (indirect cost) perspectives., Methods: A patient care pathway map and a cost-minimisation analysis were developed to estimate SC and IV natalizumab annual costs over a 2-year time horizon. Considering the patient care pathway and according to natalizumab experience (IV) or estimation (SC), a national expert panel involving neurologists, pharmacists, and nurses provided information/data regarding resource consumption for drug and patient preparation, administration, and documentation. One hour of observation was applied to the first six (SC) or 12 (IV) doses, and 5 min for successive doses. The Day hospital (infusion suite) facilities at a reference hospital were considered for IV administrations and the first six SC injections. For successive SC injections, either a reference hospital or regional hospital in a consulting room was considered. Productivity time associated with travel (56 min to reference hospital, 24 min to regional hospital) and waiting time pre- and post-treatment (SC 15 min, IV 25 min) were assessed for patients and caregivers (accompanying 20% of SC and 35% of IV administrations). National salaries for healthcare professionals were used for cost estimation (€, year 2021)., Results: At years 1 and 2, total time and cost savings (excluding drug acquisition cost) per patient, driven by saving on administration and patient and caregiver productivity for SC at a reference hospital versus IV at a reference hospital, were 116 h (a reduction of 54.6%) and €3682.82 (a reduction of 66.2%). In the case of natalizumab SC at a regional hospital, the total time and cost saving were 129 h (a reduction of 60.6%) and €3883.47 (a reduction of 69.8%)., Conclusions: Besides the potential benefits of convenient administration and improving work-life balance, as suggested by the expert panel, natalizumab SC was associated with cost savings for the healthcare system by avoiding drug preparation, reducing administration time, and freeing up infusion suite capacity. Additional cost savings could be derived with regional hospital administration of natalizumab SC by reducing productivity loss., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Cladribine is a disease-modifying selective immune reconstitution oral therapy for adult patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). It was approved in the USA in 2019 and in Europe in 2017, thus there are still gaps in existing guidelines for using cladribine tablets in clinical practice. Nine experts with extensive experience in managing patients with multiple sclerosis in Spain identified some of the unanswered questions related to the real-life use of cladribine tablets. They reviewed the available clinical trial data and real-world evidence, including their own experiences of using cladribine, over the course of three virtual meetings held between November 2020 and January 2021. This article gathers their practical recommendations to aid treatment decision-making and optimise the use of cladribine tablets in patients with RMS. The consensus recommendations cover the following areas: candidate patient profiles, switching strategies (to and from cladribine), managing response to cladribine and safety considerations., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is associated with a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of NMOSD on HRQoL from the patients' perspective and its relationship with other disease factors., Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at 13 neuroimmunology clinics in Spain. Patients with NMOSD diagnosis (2015 Wingerchuk criteria) were included. The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was used to assess the HRQoL. Different questionnaires were used to measure symptom severity, stigma, mood disorders, pain, fatigue, and difficulties in the workplace. Factors that impact HRQoL were identified by Spearman's correlation and multivariate linear regression analysis., Results: Seventy-one patients were included (mean age 47.4 ± 14.9 years, 80.3% female, mean time since disease onset 9.9 ± 8.1 years). The median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 3.0 (1.5-4.5). The mean (± SD) physical and psychological MSIS-29 sub-scores were 41.9 ± 16.8 and 20.9 ± 8.3, respectively. Fatigue and body pain were the most prevalent symptoms. Depressive symptoms were found in 44.3% (n = 31) of patients. The physical MSIS-29 dimension showed the highest correlation with symptom severity (ρ = 0.85584, p < 0.0001), whereas the highest correlations for psychological MSIS-29 dimension were pain, MSIS-29 physical dimension, and depression (ρ = 0.76487, 0.72779, 0.71380; p < 0.0001, respectively). Pain was a predictor of both dimensions of MSIS-29., Conclusion: Fatigue, pain, and depressive symptoms are frequent problems among patients with NMOSD, impacting on their quality of life. Assessment of patient-oriented outcomes may be useful to achieve a holistic approach, allowing early specific interventions., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The increase in available disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis has led to greater emphasis on improving treatment sequencing paradigms. This article summarises the opinions from a panel of 25 experts on treatment switching approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Methods: A modified Delphi consensus process was carried out to develop clinically relevant statements for aiding treatment decisions in patients with RMS between the 16 th January and the 9 th October 2019. A sub-group of two experts (core group) carried out an extensive review of the literature and formulated 106 statements for the expert panel to evaluate., Results: From a total number of 106 statements that were submitted to the expert panel for critical evaluation, consensus (at least 80% of the panelists agreed) was reached on 99 of them. These statements cover treatment objectives, reasons for DMT switching, suboptimal response criteria, strategies for treatment change and washout periods., Conclusion: The agreed statements provide up-to-date guidance on DMT sequencing for optimal patient management., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Functional rehabilitation programs in multiple sclerosis have demonstrated their efficacy in improving fatigue. The assessment of functional impairment, however, is more difficult. The purpose is to assess fatigue and disability as a first study measure and to verify their improvement after a specific functional rehabilitation program. An analytical, longitudinal, prospective, and experimental study was carried out with 51 patients aged 18-55 years, with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 2 and 6.5 who were being followed up in outpatient clinics of the Rehabilitation Service of La Princesa Hospital. The fatigue and disability outcomes before and after a structured exercise training program were evaluated, with each subject acting as their own control. The variables were measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Barthel Index (BI), and Functional Independence Scale (FIM). Differences according to recurrent or progressive course of the disease are assessed. Improvement in the FIM scale was observed after the retraining program ( p = 0.016) and was maintained in the medium term ( p = 0.042). This improvement is not statistically significant in Barthel Index. Improvement in MFIS is observed after the program ( p < 0.001) and 4-6 months after the end. Both disease courses experience the same improvements with no statistically significant differences between them. The retraining program improves fatigue and multiple sclerosis-related functionality in the short and medium term. There are no differences according to disease course. Both experience the same positive changes with our intervention., Competing Interests: The authors have reported no potential conflicts of interest that exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2022 María José Arriaza et al.)

Background: The frequency of cognitive impairment (CI) reported in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is highly variable, and its relationship with demographic and clinical characteristics is poorly understood. We aimed to describe the cognitive profile of NMOSD patients, and to analyse the cognitive differences according to their serostatus; furthermore, we aimed to assess the relationship between cognition, demographic and clinical characteristics, and other aspects linked to health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 41 patients (median age, 44 years; 85% women) from 13 Spanish centres. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected along with a cognitive z-score (Rao’s Battery) and HRQoL patient-centred measures, and their relationship was explored using linear regression. We used the Akaike information criterion to model which characteristics were associated with cognition. Results: Fourteen patients (34%) had CI, and the most affected cognitive domain was visual memory. Cognition was similar in AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative patients. Gender, mood, fatigue, satisfaction with life, and perception of stigma were associated with cognitive performance (adjusted R2 = 0.396, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight the presence of CI and its impact on HRQoL in NMOSD patients. Cognitive and psychological assessments may be crucial to achieve a holistic approach in patient care.

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system involving astrocytes, B lymphocytes, anti-aquaporin 4, and such inflammatory mediators as interleukin-6. Several immunosuppressants are used in their treatment. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, may be a treatment option., Method: We performed an observational, retrospective study analysing parameters of effectiveness (annualised relapse rate, disability, and radiological progression) and safety of tocilizumab in patients with NMOSD in whom previous immunosuppressant treatment had failed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in clinical practice in patients with NMOSD not responding to other immunosuppressants., Results: Five patients with NMOSD were analysed. Sixty percent of patients were women; mean age at diagnosis was 50±5.3 years and mean progression time was 4.5±3.6 years. Previously administered immunosuppressants were rituximab (in all 5), cyclophosphamide (2), and azathioprine (1). Mean time of exposure to tocilizumab was 2.3±1 years. Mean annualised relapse rate was 1.8±1.3 in the year prior to the introduction of tocilizumab and 0.2±0.4 the year after (P <.05), representing a reduction of 88.9%., Conclusions: In our experience, tocilizumab is safe and effective in patients with NMOSD showing no response to other immunosuppressants., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Neurología. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are increasingly demanding access to reliable information regarding their disease. The objective of the INFOSEEK-MS study was to assess what are the strategies people with MS use when searching for information on their disease, including sources, frequency, reliability, and preferred content., Patients and Methods: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients with a diagnosis of MS according to the 2010 McDonald criteria were included. The InfoSeek questionnaire was used to assess patients' strategies when seeking information about the disease. Clinical characteristics and other variables, including disability, quality of life, fatigue, cognition, anxiety and depression, were analysed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), 5-item Modified Fatigue Scale (MFIS-5), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively., Results: Three hundred and two patients were studied (mean age: 42.3 ± 10 years, 64% female, mean disease duration: 9.6 ± 7.0 years, 90% with relapsing-remitting MS, and mean EDSS score: 2.6 ± 1.9). The internet (either via mobile or computer) is a frequently reported source of information. Lifestyle-related information (67.2%), research and emerging treatments (63.6%), symptom control (49.7%), sharing experiences with other patients (46.4%), and disease prognosis (46.4%) were the most searched topics. Neurologists and nurses were the most trusted source of information. Younger patients and higher SDMT scores were associated with all search resources (M = 37.7 and M = 49.97, respectively). The frequency of searches was related to the number of relapses (R 2 = 0.07), EDSS (R 2 = 0.14), MSIS-29 physical and psychological components (R 2 = 0.132) and inversely with depression (R 2 = 0.132)., Conclusion: Although healthcare professionals are considered the most reliable source of information for people with MS, searching for information on the Internet is very frequent. An individualized information strategy considering the different factors involved is needed., Competing Interests: ES, RC-M, and JM are employees of Roche Pharma, Spain. YH reports personal fees from Roche, medical writing support from Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi Genzyme, outside the submitted work. MÁRD reports on the Institutional Research Agreement from Pfizer and Medtronic, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Higueras et al.)

Introduction: Cognitive impairment (CI) has a prevalence of 45-70% in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), producing a negative impact on their quality of life, personal life, and work. Early detection of CI has become an important aspect to be considered for an adequate follow-up, to optimize social adaptation and to implement specific cognitive rehabilitation strategies. The aim of this work is to propose a suitable cognitive evaluation of patients with MS based on available and efficient tools for diagnosis and monitoring purposes well supported by literature review and clinical experience., Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of professionals from the field of neurology, neuropsychology, and neuroimaging performed a literature review of the topic of cognitive impairment assessment. This was combined and completed with their clinical experience to produce a set of recommendations., Results: Some limitations to cognitive evaluation are described: shortage of time and resources during the neurology consultation, scarceness or absence of specialized professionals' availability, importance of tests adaptation, and doubts about its use to define therapeutic efficiency. We recommend a baseline and annual screening evaluation, and we suggest a baseline and periodic neuropsychological assessment. The latter ought to change to a recommendation with the presence of either positive screening test, or subjective to cognitive complaints, screening-test results and patient or family report mismatch, or in specific social/work situations., Conclusions: Cognitive evaluation should be performed on all patients diagnosed with MS and throughout follow-up. It is necessary to support the creation of multidisciplinary MS teams to optimize the evaluation and follow-up of MS patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Limited information is available on incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study investigated the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related outcomes in patients with MS, and compared these with the general population., Methods: A regional registry was created to collect data on incidence, hospitalization rates, intensive care unit admission, and death in patients with MS and COVID-19. National government outcomes and seroprevalence data were used for comparison. The study was conducted at 14 specialist MS treatment centers in Madrid, Spain, between February and May 2020., Results: Two-hundred nineteen patients were included in the registry, 51 of whom were hospitalized with COVID-19. The mean age ± standard deviation was 45.3 ± 12.4 years, and the mean duration of MS was 11.9 ± 8.9 years. The infection incidence rate was lower in patients with MS than the general population (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.80), but hospitalization rates were higher (relative risk = 5.03, 95% CI = 3.76-6.62). Disease severity was generally low, with only one admission to an intensive care unit and five deaths. Males with MS had higher incidence rates and risk of hospitalization than females. No association was found between the use of any disease-modifying treatment and hospitalization risk., Conclusions: Patients with MS do not appear to have greater risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with the general population. The decision to start or continue disease-modifying treatment should be based on a careful risk-benefit assessment., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To describe the profile of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with fingolimod in Spain and to assess the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod after 4 years of inclusion in the Spanish Gilenya Registry., Methods: An observational, retrospective/prospective, multicenter case registry, including all patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) starting treatment with fingolimod in 43 centers in Spain. Analyses were performed in the overall population and in subgroups according to prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT): glatiramer acetate/interferon beta-1 (BRACE), natalizumab, other treatment, or naïve., Results: Six hundred and sixty-six evaluable patients were included (91.1% previously treated with at least one DMT). The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) prior to fingolimod was 1.12, and the mean EDSS at fingolimod initiation was 3.03. Fingolimod reduced the ARR by 71.4%, 75%, 75.5%, and 80.3%, after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively (p<0.001). This significant reduction in the ARR continued to be observed in all subgroups. After 4 years, the EDSS showed a minimal deterioration, with the EDSS scores from year 1 to year 4 remaining mostly stable. The percentage of patients without T1 Gd+ lesions progressively increased from 45.6% during the year prior to fingolimod initiation to 88.2% at year 4. The proportion of patients free from new/enlarged T2 lesions after 4 years of fingolimod treatment was 80.3%. This trend in both radiological measures was also observed in the subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were experienced by up to 41.6% of patients (most commonly: lymphopenia [12.5%] and urinary tract infection [3.7%]). Most AEs were mild in severity, 3.6% of patients had serious AEs., Conclusions: The patient profile was similar to other observational studies. The results obtained from the long-term use of fingolimod showed that it was effective, regardless of prior DMT, and it had adequate safety results, with a positive benefit-risk balance., Competing Interests: Meca‐Lallana [Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and TEVA], C. Oreja‐Guevara [Biogen‐Idec, Novartis, Merck‐Serono, Almirall, Teva and Genzyme], D. Muñoz [Merck,Biogen, Teva, Novartis and Genzyme], J. Olascoaga [Biogen Idec, Bayer‐Schering, Genzyme, Merck‐Serono, Novartis and Teva], A. Pato [Novartis, Biogen and Genzyme Almirall], L. Ramió [Biogen Idec, Novartis, Bayer, Merck‐Serono, Genzyme, Teva PharmaceuticalIndustries Ltd.], V. Meca‐Lallana [Almirall, Biogen Idec,Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva and Terumo], M.A. Hernández [Merck Serono, Novartis, Biogen, Genzyme, TEVA and Almirall ], M.E. Marzo [nothing to disclose ], J.C. Álvarez‐Cermeño [Bayer Schering Pharma, Merk Serono, Biogen‐Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi‐Aventis, Genzyme, and Novartis ], A. Rodríguez‐Antigüedad [Biogen‐Idec, Novartis, Merck‐Serono, Teva and Genzyme. ], X. Montalbán [Biogen‐Idec, Bayer‐ Schering, Merck‐Serono, Teva, Novartis, and Sanofi‐Genzyme, Bayer‐Schering, Genzyme, Merck‐Serono, Teva, Novartis, Actelion, Almirall, Allergan and Roche.] Ó. Fernández [Biogen‐Idec, Bayer‐ Schering, Genzyme, Merck‐Serono, Teva, Novartis, Actelion, Almirall, Allergan and Roche.] The rest of investigators do not declare any competing interests related to this article.

Background: Plasma concentration of natalizumab falls above the therapeutic threshold in many patients who, therefore, receive more natalizumab than necessary and have higher risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Objective: To assess in a single study the individual and treatment characteristics that influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in the real-world practice. Methods: Prospective observational study to analyse the impact of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, gender, age, treatment duration, and dosage scheme on natalizumab concentrations and the occupancy of α4-integrin receptor (RO) by natalizumab. Results: Natalizumab concentrations ranged from 0.72 to 67 μg/ml, and RO from 26 to 100%. Body mass index inversely associated with natalizumab concentration (beta = -1.78; p ≤ 0.001), as it did body weight (beta = -0.34; p = 0.001), but not height, body surface area, age or gender Extended vs. standard dose scheme, but not treatment duration, was inversely associated with natalizumab concentration (beta = -7.92; p = 0.016). Similar to natalizumab concentration, body mass index (beta = -1.39; p = 0.001) and weight (beta = -0.31; p = 0.001) inversely impacted RO. Finally, there was a strong direct linear correlation between serum concentrations and RO until 9 μg/ml (rho = 0.71; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, most patients had higher concentrations of natalizumab resulting in the saturation of the integrin. Conclusions: Body mass index and dosing interval are the main variables found to influence the pharmacology of natalizumab. Plasma concentration of natalizumab and/or RO are wide variable among patients and should be routinely measured to personalize treatment and, therefore, avoid either over and underdosing., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Serra López-Matencio, Pérez García, Meca-Lallana, Juárez-Sánchez, Ursa, Vega-Piris, Pascual-Salcedo, de Vries, Rispens and Muñoz-Calleja.)

Introduction: In the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) there is still a need to identify biomarkers of disease progression, and clinical and subclinical activity. Among them, determination of neurofilament light chain plasma levels (NfL-PM) has shown a possible correlation with clinical course and assessment of therapeutic response in MS patients. However, the determination of NfL-PM has to overcome several obstacles that hinder its integration into healthcare practice, such as the absence of normalised values and standardised protocols., Aim: This article has two main aims: a) to review the evidence on the usefulness of NfL in clinical practice as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation in MS, and b) to pool the conclusions from a forum of MS experts gathered to discuss the usefulness and applicability of NfL-PM determination in Spain (EMotion Forum 2020)., Development: NfL-PM seems particularly useful in determining subclinical activity in MS and offers the possibility of identifying populations at risk of developing MS, such as cases of radiologically isolated syndrome. Issues such as the monitoring of induction disease-modifying drugs or the assessment of suboptimal responses for the withdrawal of ineffective disease-modifying drugs should be considered., Conclusions: The experts agreed on the diagnostic and prognostic potential of NfL-PM determination and that its usefulness in MS can contribute to the general development of the technique.

Background: The assessment of self-reported outcomes in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is limited by the lack of validated disease-specific measures. The SymptoMScreen (SyMS) is a patient-reported questionnaire for measuring symptom severity in different domains affected by multiple sclerosis (MS), but has not been thoroughly evaluated in NMOSD. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the SyMS in a sample of patients with NMOSD., Methods: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study in adult subjects with NMOSD (Wingerchuk 2015 criteria) was conducted at 13 neuroimmunology clinics applying the SyMS. A non-parametric item response theory procedure, Mokken analysis, was performed to assess the underlying dimensional structure and scalability of items and overall questionnaire. All analyses were performed with R (v4.0.3) using the mokken library., Results: A total of 70 patients were studied (mean age: 47.5 ± 15 years, 80% female, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score: 3.0 [interquartile range 1.5, 4.5]). Symptom severity was low (median SyMS score: 19.0 [interquartile range 10.0, 32.0]). The SyMS showed a robust internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.90 [95% confidence interval 0.86, 0.93]) and behaved as a unidimensional scale with all items showing scalability coefficients > 0.30. The overall SyMS scalability was 0.45 conforming to a medium scale according to Mokken's criteria. Fatigue and body pain were the domains with the highest scalability coefficients. The SyMS was associated with disability (rho: 0.586), and physical and psychological quality of life (rho: 0.856 and 0.696, respectively)., Conclusions: The SyMS shows appropriate psychometric characteristics and may constitute a valuable and easy-to-implement option to measure symptom severity in patients with NMOSD., Competing Interests: This study was funded by the Medical Department of Roche Farma Spain (ML41397). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Jorge Maurino and Rocío Gómez-Ballesteros are employees of Roche Farma Spain. Daniel Prefasi was an employee of Roche Farma Spain when the study was designed, the data were collected, and the statistical analysis was carried out. Francisco Pérez-Miralles received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards or speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. María Sepúlveda reports personal fees from Roche and UCB, and travel reimbursement from Sanofi and Zambon. Carmen Calles reports personal fees from Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Teva, and Roche. Lucía Romero-Pinel received compensation to participate in advisory boards, collaborations as a consultant and scientific communications and received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen, Bayer, Almirall, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis, and Teva. Ángel P Sempere reports personal fees from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Sanofi, and Teva. Luis Querol reports grants from ISCIII, CIBERER, GBS-CIDP Foundation International, personal fees from UCB Pharma as the global principal investigator in clinical trial, grants and/or personal fees from Grifols, Roche, Merck, Akcea, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Annexon. Lucienne Costa-Frossard reports personal fees from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Biopass, BMS, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, and Teva. Javier Ballesteros collaborated in this study through a research contract between the UPV/EHU and Roche Farma Spain. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Objective: To understand COVID-19 characteristics in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identify high-risk individuals due to their immunocompromised state resulting from the use of disease-modifying treatments., Methods: Retrospective and multicenter registry in patients with MS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and available disease course (mild = ambulatory; severe = hospitalization; and critical = intensive care unit/death). Cases were analyzed for associations between MS characteristics and COVID-19 course and for identifying risk factors for a fatal outcome., Results: Of the 326 patients analyzed, 120 were cases confirmed by real-time PCR, 34 by a serologic test, and 205 were suspected. Sixty-nine patients (21.3%) developed severe infection, 10 (3%) critical, and 7 (2.1%) died. Ambulatory patients were higher in relapsing MS forms, treated with injectables and oral first-line agents, whereas more severe cases were observed in patients on pulsed immunosuppressors and critical cases among patients with no therapy. Severe and critical infections were more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, with progressive MS forms, a longer disease course, and higher disability. Fifteen of 33 patients treated with rituximab were hospitalized. Four deceased patients have progressive MS, 5 were not receiving MS therapy, and 2 were treated (natalizumab and rituximab). Multivariate analysis showed age (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.17) as the only independent risk factor for a fatal outcome., Conclusions: This study has not demonstrated the presumed critical role of MS therapy in the course of COVID-19 but evidenced that people with MS with advanced age and disease, in progressive course, and those who are more disabled have a higher probability of severe and even fatal disease., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) has long been defined by progressive disability accrual in the absence of initial relapses. However, its underlying neurodegenerative process seems to be accompanied by central nervous system inflammation. A new classification defined multiple sclerosis courses according to clinical/radiological activity and progression. We provide further insight into PPMS activity according to this classification and other daily living aspects., Methods: This was a multicentre, prospective, cohort study including 55 adult patients with PPMS according to 2010 McDonald criteria, within ten years from neurologic symptom onset and not receiving disease-modifying therapies during the past six months, who were followed up for 12 months. The primary study endpoint was the percentage of patients with active disease based on clinical relapses and/or magnetic resonance activity. Disability progression, cognitive function, physical/psychological impact, depression symptoms, stigma and employment were secondary endpoints., Results: Eleven (25.6%) patients exhibited multiple sclerosis activity throughout the 12-month study follow-up. Fourteen showed non-active multiple sclerosis without progression, 11 non-active multiple sclerosis with progression, 6 active multiple sclerosis without progression and 4 active multiple sclerosis with progression; one patient with disease activity was not assessable for progression. Cognitive function scores remained unchanged or increased, disease physical impact was maintained and disease psychological impact significantly decreased. The proportion of patients with depression symptoms or stigma remained without significant changes as well as employment outcomes., Conclusion: This study shows that one-fourth of PPMS patients may exhibit disease activity over one year, with disability progression in approximately one-third but without worsening of cognitive function, disease impact, depression, stigma or employment outcomes., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Perception of stigma was associated with low self-esteem, psychological problems, and decreased health-seeking behavior among patients with different neurological disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess stigmatization and its impact in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)., Methods: A non-interventional study was conducted at thirteen neuroimmunology clinics in Spain. Patients with a diagnosis of NMOSD (2015 Wingerchuk criteria) were included. The 8-item Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS), the MOS Pain Effects Scale (MOS-PES) and the Fatigue Impact Scale for Daily Use (D-FIS) were used to assess the perception of stigma, disability, quality of life, mood, pain, and fatigue, respectively. Associations between outcome measures were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation., Results: Seventy-one patients were studied (mean age: 47.4 years ± 14.9, 81.7% female, mean time since disease onset: 9.9 years ± 8.1). The median EDSS score was 3.0 (interquartile range 1.5, 4.5). Stigma prevalence was 61.4% (n=43). Thirty-one patients (43.6%) had depression. The SSCI-8 score showed a significant correlation with both physical (rho=0.576, p<0.0001) and psychological (rho=0.608, p<0.0001) MSIS-29 scales scores, EDSS score (rho=0.349, p=0.0033), BDI-FS score (rho= 0.613, p<0.0001), MOS-PES score (rho= 0.457, p<0.0001), and D-FIS score (rho=0.556, p<0.0001)., Conclusion: Stigma is a common phenomenon affecting over 6 out of 10 patients with NMOSD. Understanding stigma may be useful to develop educational strategies improving NMOSD knowledge., Competing Interests: D. Prefasi, H. de Castro-Trapiello, and J. Maurino are employees of Roche Farma Spain. N. Canal is an employee of IQVIA Spain and IQVIA has received honoraria from Roche for clinical research services. F. Pérez-Miralles has received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards or speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck‐Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi‐Aventis, and Teva, outside the submitted work. M. Sepúlveda reports personal fees from Roche and UCB; travel reimbursement from Sanofi and Zambon. C. Calles reports personal fees from Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Teva, and Roche, outside the submitted work. S. Boyero reports personal fees from Roche, during the conduct of the study. L. Romero-Pinel took part in the observational study of Neuromyelitis optica: perspective NMO-ML41397. She also received honoraria compensation to participate in advisory boards, collaborations as a consultant and scientific communications and received research support, funding for travel and congress expenses from Biogen Idec, Bayer, Almirall, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Novartis, and Teva. She reports participation in several clinical trials. Á Sempere reports personal fees from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Sanofi, and Teva, outside the submitted work. L. Querol reports grants from ISCIII, CIBERER, GBS-CIDP Foundation International, personal fees from UCB Pharma as the global principal investigator in clinical trial, grants and/or personal fees from Grifols, Roche, Merck, Akcea, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Annexon, outside the submitted work. L. Costa-Frossard reports personal fees from Roche, during the conduct of the study; speaker fees, travel support, and/or served on advisory boards from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Biopass, Bristol-Myers, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2021 Meca-Lallana et al.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is primarily an inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system, triggered by unknown environmental factors in patients with predisposing genetic risk profiles. The prevention of neurological disability is one of the essential goals to be achieved in a patient with MS. However, the pathogenic mechanisms driving the progressive phase of the disease remain unknown. It was described that the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with disease progression are present from disease onset. In daily practice, there is a lack of clinical, radiological, or biological markers that favor an early detection of the disease's progression. Different definitions of disability progression were used in clinical trials. According to the most descriptive, progression was defined as a minimum increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 from a baseline level of 0, 1.0-5.0, and 5.5, respectively. Nevertheless, the EDSS is not the most sensitive scale to assess progression, and there is no consensus regarding any specific diagnostic criteria for disability progression. This review document discusses the current pathophysiological concepts associated with MS progression, the different measurement strategies, the biomarkers associated with disability progression, and the available pharmacologic therapeutic approaches., Competing Interests: VM-L has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Terumo, Sanofi and Teva. LB-R has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Sanofy-Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. JC-P has received compensation for consulting services from Roche. SE-M has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. JF-L has received compensation for consulting services from Roche. LF has received compensation for consulting services from Roche, Merck, Novartis and Genzyme, for speaking honoraria from Roche, Merck and Novartis, and for traveling grants from Genzyme, Roche and Novartis. YH has received compensation for consulting services from Roche and Merck, Novartis, Teva and Genzyme, for speaking, honoraria from Roche, Merck and Novartis, and for traveling grants from Merck, Genzyme, Roche and Novartis. NT has received compensation for consulting services, traveling grants and speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, and Roche. AV-J has received investigation grants Juan Rodes (JR16/00024) from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and has received compensation for consulting services, participation in advisory boards, and speaking honoraria from Novartis, Stendhal, Roche, Teva, Biogen, and Genzyme-Sanofi. FP-M has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme y Biogen, and speaking honoraria from Novartis, Almirall and Teva., (Copyright © 2021 Meca-Lallana, Berenguer-Ruiz, Carreres-Polo, Eichau-Madueño, Ferrer-Lozano, Forero, Higueras, Téllez Lara, Vidal-Jordana and Pérez-Miralles.)

Background and Purpose: Evidence on regional changes resulting from neurodegenerative processes underlying primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is still limited. We assessed brain region volumes and their relationship with disability progression and cognitive function in PPMS patients., Methods: This was an MRI analysis of 43 patients from the prospective Understanding Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (UPPMS) cohort study. MRI scans were performed within 3 months before enrollment and at month 12., Results: Gray matter volume of declive and white matter volumes adjacent to left straight gyrus, right calcarine sulcus, and right inferior occipital gyrus significantly decreased from baseline to month 12. Baseline white matter volumes adjacent to right amygdala and left cuneus significantly differed between patients with and without disability progression, as well as baseline gray matter volumes of left cuneus, right parahippocampal gyrus, right insula, left superior frontal gyrus, declive, right inferior temporal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus (pole), and right calcarine sulcus. Baseline gray matter volumes of right cuneus and right superior temporal gyrus positively correlated with 12-month Selective Reminding Test and Word List Generation performance, respectively. Gray matter changes in right superior semilunar lobe and white matter adjacent to left declive and right cerebellar tonsil also positively correlated with Word List Generation scores, while white matter change in left inferior semilunar lobe positively correlated with Symbol Digit Modalities Test performance after 12 months., Conclusions: White and gray matter volumes of specific brain regions could predict disability progression and cognitive performance of PPMS patients after one year., (© 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)