Search

We previously developed an ELISA assay for detection of tetanus toxoid antigen in tetanus vaccines for human use. Tetanus vaccines for veterinary use are qualitatively different to those used in humans, often containing a larger number and variety of non-tetanus antigens in the multi-valent products, and adjuvants that are not found in human vaccines. We assessed performance of the capture ELISA with a range of veterinary tetanus vaccines as a first step towards development of an immunoassay as a potential in vivo potency substitute. Nine tetanus vaccines were tested and all produced a good dose response in the ELISA. The shape of the dose response curve for the whole vaccine compared to a matched non-adjuvanted tetanus toxoid antigen was more comparable for vaccines containing a non-aluminium adjuvant than products containing aluminium adjuvants. Elution of the antigen from aluminium adjuvant did not improve the comparability of the dose response curve but did increase the total amount of tetanus antigen available for detection. The ELISA was highly specific for tetanus with no signal obtained for a large number of non-tetanus antigens. These results suggest that a capture ELISA assay can be applied to a control strategy for veterinary tetanus vaccines., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Testing of diphtheria vaccines for routine lot release relies heavily on the use of in vivo potency assays. However, consistency of production is also recognised as an important feature of vaccine manufacture, and in vitro assays are superior to in vivo assays for providing this information. In adsorbed vaccines, antigen and adjuvant are the major components contributing to immunogenicity and are therefore critical factors to be evaluated as part of consistency testing. Here we describe a simple and sensitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) which has been developed to quantify diphtheria toxoid antigen in combined vaccine products and can also be used to monitor the degree of adsorption. This assay can be applied to a variety of multi-component vaccines and is robust, specific and highly sensitive, with a limit of quantification of approximately 0.005 Lf/ml. The antigen assay is an excellent test to characterise vaccines and monitor trends in production. For well established vaccines, the antigen assay could be used alongside other in vitro methods to provide a more informative product profile, with the ultimate aim of reducing the requirement for in vivo potency assays and therefore the number of animals required for routine batch release testing.

A collaborative study on the evaluation of an alternative functional assay, the Vero cell method, to the Ph. Eur. in vivo challenge procedures for potency determination of diphtheria toxoid in 6 different combined vaccines was initiated in January 2001. The study was an extension of a previous study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of tetanus toxoid vaccines for human use. To allow interim evaluation of test results and to monitor study progress, the project was divided into three consecutive phases. The results of Phase I and II studies are presented in this report. Pre-validation (Phase I) study, performed in two laboratories, indicated that comparable diphtheria potency estimates were obtained in the Ph. Eur. direct intradermal challenge assay in guinea pigs, in Vero cell assay and in indirect ELISA for five vaccines of different potencies (range of estimates: ca. 20-200 IU/ml). The correlation coefficients between the challenge assay and the Vero cell assay corresponded to those between the challenge assay and ELISA, confirming that the antibodies play an important role in protection and that predominantly protective/neutralising antibodies are present in guinea pigs, at the time point investigated. It was observed, for Vero cell assays, that about 16-35 (9-28 in Phase II study) fold lower titre of individual serum samples were obtained when using equine, rather than guinea pig reference serum. The study also provided preliminary information that sera from the same guinea pigs may be used for potency determination of both diphtheria and tetanus toxoid components of vaccines. In Phase II, another five laboratories analysed a subset of the vaccines included in Phase I study plus an additional vaccine. Four laboratories performed the lethal challenge assay and one laboratory carried out the intradermal challenge assay. All laboratories also performed the Vero cell assay and both ELISA for diphtheria antitoxin and ELISA for tetanus antitoxin. One laboratory also performed the tetanus ToBI assay. The correlation coefficient (r) between Vero cell assay and ELISA for diphtheria antitoxin ranged from 0.76 to 0.91 in the different laboratories. The correlation between diphtheria serological assays and challenge assays were confirmed satisfactory as ca. 90 per cent of serum-estimates lead to correct prediction of mortality. All laboratories had identical rankings of the vaccines in all serological assays and in the valid challenge assays. The ranking order was identical to assumed/provided potency for the highest and the lowest vaccine. Two of the vaccines had an inversion in some assays and laboratories. As these two vaccines have almost identical potencies in all assays, these inversions are not significant. As the vaccine doses were optimised for the diphtheria component, serum anti-tetanus toxoid/toxin activities varied widely between the vaccines, making it questionable to apply a parallel line model to calculate exact potencies. However, the dose levels used showed a clear regression and good linearity in general. DTaP vaccines containing the IPV component did not always meet the present Ph. Eur. requirements in the serological assays. It should be further investigated in the Phase III study if this is a general feature of such combined vaccines. Preliminary investigations on samples from two laboratories indicate that the neutralising activity of type 1, 2 and 3 polioviruses can also be detected, in a dose-dependent way. Further studies are in progress with serum samples from other laboratories. In the light of results obtained in the first two phases, it is recommended to proceed with Phase III study to investigate reliability of the in vitro assays. In Phase III it will also be further investigated whether the serological assays for D and T components are suitable for the control of the multi-component vaccines currently marketed in Europe.

Phase I of BSP034 collaborative study was extended in two laboratories to include correlation of serology with in vivo toxin neutralisation test (TNT) using 2 separate sets of 20 serum pools, produced in-house. The study investigated the extent to which the in vitro methods for diphtheria antibodies, Vero cell assay and diphtheria enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diphtheria antitoxin (D-ELISA), can detect neutralising antibodies by comparison with TNT in guinea pigs. The study was also performed to compare the antibody neutralising potency obtained in relation to guinea pig (GP) or equine (DI) antitoxin standard. In addition, the study provided an opportunity to compare ELISA for tetanus antitoxin (T-ELISA) and TNT assay for detection of anti-tetanus antibodies, from the same set of serum pools. The data obtained show that antitoxin potency obtained by Vero cell assay, D-ELISA and T-ELISA using the same GP standard, highly correlated with neutralising potency as determined in respective TNT assays. Vero cell assay with DI provided estimates that also correlated with neutralising potency, but were of significantly lower titre. Since reference to DI standard is widely used in serodiagnosis, as well as in clinical studies where diphtheria antitoxin titres obtained in the Vero cell method are taken as surrogate markers for vaccine efficacy, it should be investigated if a similar difference is also observed for human serology.

The stability and integrity of glycoconjugate vaccines requires determination of the total saccharide and quantification of the unbound or free saccharide present. The traditional assay for Hib conjugates, based on colorimetric determination of ribose, has been much improved by the use of base hydrolysis and analysis of the Hib subunit generated using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The production of this subunit was confirmed by NMR analysis. However, quantification of free Hib saccharide using this method was not possible in the combination vaccines evaluated due to interferences emanating from DPT. Thus a method based on TFA hydrolysis followed by the chromatographic separation and quantification of ribitol on a CarboPac MA1 column was developed. The method is selective, and with the use of ED40 electrode, requires only nanomole amounts for the chromatographic step, thereby ensuring that free saccharide can be monitored accurately in the formulated Hib-CRM vaccine alone and when in combination with other vaccines.

A general methodology is presented for the validation of assays used for testing combination vaccines. The presentation is detailed and technical as our intention is to address challenges that we have encountered in the design and statistical analysis of assay validation studies. There are several noteworthy features which render the approach particularly useful in practice. It employs a statistical experimental design approach to the investigation of assay ruggedness with respect to manufacturing variability; it makes use of the assay variability results to determine the level of test-run replication necessary to achieve precision compatible with the product specifications; and, it provides a generic approach to assay validation. With combination vaccines, as with other pharmaceuticals, the analytical methods for release and stability must be validated early in the development programme Several things, though, distinguish this task with combination vaccines: (1) assays are typically pre-existing and often have been validated for use with an established sample matrix, e.g. a monovalent formulation; (2) sample matrices are complex and therefore more subject to manufacturing variability and more likely to cause assay interferences; and (3) the analytical workload is considerable due to the number of antigens. The methodology presented here was developed jointly by Merck Research Laboratories (West Point, PA) and Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Inc. (Swiftwater, PA). Many of the issues discussed here have application outside of combination vaccines and are common features of all assay validations., (Copyright 1999 The International Association for Biologicals.)

In view of the current efforts to find a reliable in vitro method which can suitably act as an alternative for determining the potency of the diphtheria component in a combined vaccine, we have analysed experimental batches by the method proposed by WHO [1] i.e. challenge method in guinea pigs. The same batches were also analysed by the alternative antibody induction method as suggested in the Indian Pharmacopoeia (I.P.) [2] which is similar to the old method suggested in the British Pharmacopoeia (B.P.) 1973. As per I.P. the initial part of raising the antibodies remains unaltered but the actual titration of diphtheria antitoxin from the immunised guinea pigs was performed by using the following in vitro methods: a) indirect haemagglutination test using human "O" red blood cells to coat diphtheria toxoid using chromic chloride as the coupling agent [3]; b) toxin neutralisation test using Vero cells [4]; c) a double diffusion technique in agar gel for titration of diphtheria antitoxin [5]. Our findings show clearly that the results of two in vivo methods i.e. Challenge Test, Alternative I.P. Method and the above-mentioned three in vitro methods are comparable and would certainly reduce the number of animals required by making a combination of in vivo and in vitro techniques to give us an assessment of the potency of the vaccine to be tested.

Two diphtheria-tetanus vaccines (DT), adsorbed to either aluminium hydroxide or calcium phosphate but identical with respect to toxoid origin and amounts, were compared in full potency assays in mice according to the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and in a reduced potency assay in guinea-pigs using a double dose immunization schedule. The efficacy of the vaccines was compared in a clinical trial with revaccination of 313 military recruits. The reduced potency assay gave a better reflection of the efficacy of the two vaccines in humans than the required assays of the EP. For release of combined, final vaccine formulations the reduced potency assay suggested will reduce the number of animals in quality control.