Search

Objective: In 2018, the United States Preventive Services Task Force promoted shared decision making between healthcare provider and patient for men aged 55 to 69. This study aimed to analyze rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing across racial and ethnic groups following this new recommendation. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted of the 2020–2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database to assess men aged 55 or older without a history of prostate cancer. We defined four race-ethnicity groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs), Hispanics, and Other. The primary outcome was the most recent PSA test (MRT), defined as the respondent's most recent PSA test occurring pre-2018 or post-2018 guidelines. Logistic regression adjusted for covariates including age, socioeconomic status factors, marital status, smoking history, and healthcare access factors. Results: In the age 55 to 69 study sample, NHW men had the greatest proportion of MRT post-2018 guidelines (n = 15,864, 72.5%). NHB men had the lowest percentage of MRT post-2018 guidelines (n = 965, 66.6%). With NHW as referent, the crude odds of the MRT post-2018 guidelines was 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53–0.90) for NHB. The maximally adjusted odds ratio was 0.78 (0.59–1.02). Conclusions: We found that NHB aged 55 to 69 reported decreased rates of PSA testing after 2018 when compared to NHW. This was demonstrated on crude analysis but not after adjustment. Such findings suggest the influence of social determinants of health on preventative screening for at-risk populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emergency physicians commonly treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) with rapid ventricular response, and intravenous (IV) diltiazem is the most commonly used medication for rate control of such patients. We sought to compare rate control success and safety outcomes for emergency department (ED) patients with AF or AFL who, after a diltiazem bolus, received a diltiazem drip compared to those who did not receive a drip. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of ED patients from a single hospital system with AF and AFL and a heart rate (HR) > 100 beats/min who received a diltiazem drip after an IV diltiazem bolus to those who received no drip. The primary outcome was a HR < 100 beats/min at the time of ED disposition. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and safety (hypotension, electrical cardioversion, vasopressor use, and death). We compared groups using propensity score matching. Results: Between January 1, 2020, and November 8, 2022, there were 746 AF or AFL patients eligible for analysis. Of those, 382 (51.2%) received a diltiazem drip and 364 (48.8%) did not. In the unadjusted analysis, the last recorded ED HR was <100 beats/min in 55.2% of patients in the drip group compared to 65.9% in the no‐drip group (difference 10.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7 to 17.7). After propensity matching, diltiazem drip use was associated with lower likelihood of rate control in the ED (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48–0.99) and 22.5 h (95% CI 12.2–36.8) longer hospital stay. Conclusions: For patients with AF or AFL, the use of a diltiazem drip after an IV diltiazem bolus was associated with less rate control in the ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients at high cardiovascular risk. COVID-19 patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at increased risk of poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine hospital outcomes among patients admitted with AF and COVID-19 infection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the 2020 California State Inpatient data, including all COVID-19 hospitalizations of individuals aged ≥18. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (above the 75th percentile), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. We compared adverse hospital outcomes between those with and without AF and used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Results: This analysis included 94,114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, of which 9391 (10.0%) had AF. Patients with COVID-19 and AF had higher rates of adverse outcomes, including mortality (27.2% vs. 9.6%, p <.001), prolonged length of stay (40.0% vs. 27.1%, p <.001), vasopressor use (4.4% vs. 1.9%, p <.001), mechanical ventilation (19.0% vs. 9.1%, p <.001), and ICU admission (18.4% vs. 8.8%, p <.001) After multivariable adjustment, the odds of adverse outcomes remained significantly higher, including mortality adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.04, 95% CI: 1.92–2.16), prolonged length of stay (aOR, 1.37, 95% CI: 1.31–1.44), vasopressor use (aOR, 1.98, 95% CI: 1.86–2.11), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.95, 95% CI: 1.72–2.20), and ICU admission (aOR, 2.01, 95% CI: 1.88–2.15). Conclusion: COVID-19 hospitalized patients frequently have underlying AF, which confers a higher risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality, even after adjusting for baseline comorbidities. Heightened awareness is needed in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with AF. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to investigate the hospital outcomes for patients admitted with both AF and COVID-19. We used data from the California State Inpatient Database for the year 2020, focusing on COVID-19 hospitalizations of adults aged 18 and older. The main outcomes studied were in-hospital death, extended hospital stays, use of vasopressor medications that raise blood pressure, need for mechanical ventilation, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our results showed that patients with both COVID-19 and AF had significantly worse outcomes compared to those without AF. Specifically, these patients had higher rates of death, extended hospital stays, vasopressor medication use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, even after accounting for other health conditions. The study concludes that hospitalized COVID-19 patients with underlying AF are at a greater risk for severe complications and death. This highlights the need for increased attention and care for COVID-19 patients with AF to improve their hospital outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiovascular risk is increased by a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Efforts to understand and prevent these adverse outcomes may improve both fetal and birthing persons' outcomes in the peripartum period, and over the patient's lifetime. This study aims to assess the association of clinical, sociodemographic, and economic neighbor-hood factors with preterm birth (PTB) and APOs (the composite of stillbirth, small for gestation age, and low birthweight). Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using the electronic medical records of deliveries from seven Northwell Health hospitals between January 1, 2018 and July 31, 2020. There were 62,787 deliveries reviewed in this study. Deliveries that were not the first for the patient during the study period and multiple gestational pregnancies were excluded. Patients with incomplete data on outcome were also excluded. Main outcomes were PTB and composite APOs. Measures included history of PTB, hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, race/ethnicity, age, preferred language, marital status, parity, health insurance, and median income, percent unemployment, and mean household size by zip code. Results: Of the 62,787 deliveries, 43.3% were from white, Non-Hispanic, and Non-Latino patients. There were 4,552 (7.2%) PTBs and 8,634 (13.8%) APOs. Patients enrolled in public insurance had higher odds of PTB (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.24) and APOs (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.25). There was a statistically significant association of both PTB (p = 0.037) and APOs (p = 0.005) when comparing patients that live in a zip code with a median income over 100k to those with an income <100k. In addition, living in a zip code within the second quintile of unemployment was associated with lower odds of APOs (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84–0.99). Conclusions: Numerous sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with both PTB and APOs. Tailored programs addressing these disparities may improve outcomes in pregnant persons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Increasingly, researchers have begun to explore pathways through which psychosocial factors might influence cardiovascular disease, with some emphasis on early markers. The current study examined the cross-sectional association between psychosocial factors and aortic pulse wave velocity (an early marker of cardiovascular disease) in a biracial cohort of older adults. We were particularly interested in determining whether the association between psychosocial factors and aortic pulse wave velocity differed for older blacks compared with whites. Methods. Participants were 2,488 (40% black and 52% female) older adults from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Carotid--femoral aortic pulse wave velocity was assessed using standard methodologies. Depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, negative life events, and inadequate emotional support were assessed, and a summary psychosocial risk index was created. Results. In multivariable linear regression models, psychosocial risk was not associated with aortic pulse wave velocity (Estimate [Est] = .00, p = .83), but there was a significant Race x Psychosocial risk interaction (Est = .07, p = .01), after adjusting for age, race, sex, and education. Further analyses revealed that this association was driven by the inadequate emotional support component of psychosocial risk (Race x Inadequate emotional support, p = .005). In race-stratified analyses, inadequate emotional support was associated with higher levels of arterial stiffness in older blacks (Est = .05, p = .04) but not whites (Est = -.04, p =. 13). This association persisted after adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and social network characteristics. Conclusions. Findings suggest that older blacks may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of inadequate emotional support on vascular health. Interventions aimed at increasing social support among this population might be beneficial in reducing cardiovascular disease risk. Key Words: Psychosocial--Social support--Arterial stiffness--Cardiovascular disease--African-Americans. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq089

Background: People/patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are at an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to normal disease processes, antiretroviral medication adverse effects, and age-related comorbid conditions. Preventive cardiovascular (CV) screenings such as the need for statin, low-dose aspirin, or smoking cessation counseling are not well studied in PLWH. Objectives: To investigate whether there are differences in preventive CV care offered to patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in 1 outpatient clinic. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 150 consecutive patients if they had at least 4 appointments in 2 years and they did not have a history and they do not have a history of CV events. A randomly selected sample of patients without HIV infection receiving primary care services in the same clinic were used as the control group and were enrolled using the same inclusion criteria. Results: More patients met statin criteria and were prescribed it in the HIV-negative arm [(70% vs. 24.67%; p < 0.0001); (89.52% vs. 54.05%; p < 0.0001)]. More patients in the HIV-negative arm met aspirin criteria and were prescribed it [(10.67% vs. 8.16%; p = 0.46); (50% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.33)]. There were more current smokers in the HIV-positive arm and a slightly greater number that received smoking cessation counseling [(38% vs. 11.33%; p < 0.0001); (82.46% vs. 76.47%; p = 0.58)]. Conclusion: Our results found that PLWH receive less preventive CV care compared to non-HIV-infected patients in the same outpatient clinic. Increased efforts are needed to ensure PLWH are receiving primary preventive CV care they need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Falls are among the most common adverse events reported in hospitalized patients. While there is a growing body of literature on fall prevention in the hospital, the data examining the fall rate and risk factors for falls in the immediate post-hospitalization period has not been well described. The objectives of the present study were to determine the fall rate of in-hospital fallers at home and to explore the risk factors for falls during the immediate post-hospitalization period. Methods We identified patients who sustained a fall on one of 16 medical/surgical nursing units during an inpatient admission to an urban community teaching hospital. After discharge, falls were ascertained using weekly telephone surveillance for 4 weeks post-discharge. Patients were followed until death, loss to follow up or end of study (four weeks). Time spent rehospitalized or institutionalized was censored in rate calculations. Results Of 95 hospitalized patients who fell during recruitment, 65 (68%) met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. These subjects contributed 1498 person-days to the study (mean duration of follow-up = 23 days). Seventy-five percent were African-American and 43% were women. Sixteen patients (25%) had multiple falls during hospitalization and 23 patients (35%) suffered a fall-related injury during hospitalization. Nineteen patients (29%) experienced 38 falls at their homes, yielding a fall rate of 25.4/1,000 person-days (95% CI: 17.3-33.4). Twenty-three patients (35%) were readmitted and 3(5%) died. One patient experienced a hip fracture. In exploratory univariate analysis, persons who were likely to fall at home were those who sustained multiple falls in the hospital (p = 0.008). Conclusion Patients who fall during hospitalization, especially on more than one occasion, are at high risk for falling at home following hospital discharge. Interventions to reduce falls would be appropriate to test in this high-risk population.

Abstract Background Although current evidence suggests that the spatial T wave axis captures important information about ventricular repolarization abnormalities, there are only a few and discordant epidemiologic studies addressing the ability of the spatial T wave axis to predict coronary heart disease (CHD) occurrence. Methods This prospective study analyzed data from 12,256 middle-aged African American and white men and women, from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). Following a standardized protocol, resting standard 12-lead, 10-second electrocardiograms were digitized and analyzed with the Marquette GE program. The median follow-up time was 12.1 years; incident coronary heart disease comprised fatal and non-fatal CHD events. Results The incidence rate of CHD was 4.26, 4.18, 4.28 and 5.62 per 1000 person-years respectively, across the spatial T wave axis quartiles. Among women for every 10 degrees increase in the spatial T wave axis deviation, there was an estimated increase in the risk of CHD of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04–1.28). After adjustment for age, height, weight, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, QRS axis and minor T wave abnormalities, this hazard rate ratio for women fell to 1.03 (0.92–1.14). The corresponding crude and adjusted hazard ratios for men were 1.05 (95% CI 0.96–1.15) and 0.95 (0.86–1.04) respectively. Conclusions In conclusion, this prospective, population-based, bi-ethnic study of men and women free of coronary heart disease at baseline shows that spatial T wave axis deviation is not associated with incident coronary events during long-term follow up. It is doubtful that spatial T wave axis deviation would add benefit in the prediction of CHD events above and beyond the current traditional risk factors.